FTM over de baten van de WOO, na OSF rapport baten van transparantie. Wijst ook op hoe groepen overheidsorganisaties (als universiteiten, ministeries) en ook de vorige MinBZK de WOO wel willen inperken. Vanwege de kosten, die vooral hoog uitvallen door de gebrekkige staat van de informatiehuishouding

Een project v Open State Foundation.

Ikeda, A., Yonemitsu, F., Yoshimura, N., Sasaki, K., & Yamada, Y. (2022, January 27). The Open Science Foundation clandestinely abused for malicious activities in unintended manners. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xtuen

Corker, K. S. (2021). An Open Science Workflow for More Credible, Rigorous Research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wu6sn

Brian Nosek. (2020, December 5). We need a #2020goodnews trend. Here’s one: Science keeps getting more open. One indicator from @OSFramework: OSF users posted 9,349 files of data or other research content PER DAY OSF users made 5,633 files public PER DAY EVERY DAY in 2020 #openscience is accelerating [Tweet]. @BrianNosek. https://twitter.com/BrianNosek/status/1335210552252125184

ReconfigBehSci. (2021, February 8). RT @lakens: @BrianNosek @SLLancaster @siminevazire @hardsci Very cool—And it already has a list of glossaries to build on https://t.co/c9… [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1359042653539741696

‘OSF: A Project Management Service Built for Research - ROpenSci - Open Tools for Open Science’. Accessed 10 August 2020. https://ropensci.org/blog/2020/08/04/osf/.

Check out annotation on many of the COS OSF preprint services, including paleoRxiv and SocArXiv (to name a few!)

This blog post is very useful for people wanting to share their data or files anonymously. I just knew about this OSF feature by reading this post. Thank you Steve.