A living systems] approach requires that the person applying this way ofthinking see what they are working on as a system of energies or life processes,rather than as things

First Nationspeople56 some of whose native languages were verb based and expressed processbetter than the noun-heavy English language. Such verb-based languages were

"Log in" is a valid verb where "Login" is a valid noun. "Signin", however, isn't a valid noun. On the other hand, "Signup" and "Sign up" have the same relationship, and if you use "Log in", you'll probably use "Register" as opposed to "Sign up". Then there's also "Log on" and "Logon", and of course "Log off" or "Log out".

it is an activity so futuring makes the future into a verb so the what we study is how you future how you are actively working on on Futures

I logged in to my social media accounts.

Fleeting notes

"Sign up with Google"

logIntoMicrosoft

loginTo

set [x] up

pays

build something in/into something phrasal verb with build verb

You can also find the combination verb+in+to, but in that case you're usually dealing with a phrasal verb consisting of a verb and the particle "in", which happens to be followed by the preposition "to".They wouldn't give in to our demands.

"Built in to" appears when you use the phrasal verb "build in" followed by an infinitive, but that is not what you are trying to do in your sentence.There's an electronic switch built in to stop all data transfers.

(Note that although 'n/yn here is not actually translated into English, it does act as a marker showing that the action is 'in progress', unfinished.

“ demonstrate” is a stronger reporting verb

I will detail expressions of emotional labour by my par-ticipants –in the form of pro-social motivations, entrepreneurial risk,financial precarity and the navigation of ethical complexities, includinggender, race and class dynamics –before turning to the implicationsof this labour on changing fashion practises.

Social entrepreneurs are also considered to face increased businessrisk compared to traditional entrepreneurs;

SF entrepreneurs like Greenpants play a crucial role in the“unmaking of unsustainability”6 of fashion, yet they face a range ofchallenges in this quest

gefressen

a stative verb is one that describes a state of being, in contrast to a dynamic verb, which describes an action

annotating

running

Among the reasons this may be so is that the simple future tense is more open-ended than the future perfect tense, the latter seeming to con­vey a sense of closure and a focus on specific events, which is unlike the sim­ple future tense in which anything is possible (Weick 1979, pp. 198-99). It is well to note that although Weick did not explicitly frame his argument in terms of metaphor, it is really another example of the past-as-metaphor-for- the-future idea developed in this chapter, albeit a more precise manifestation of it. The precision comes in Weick’s conclusion that some futures are more like the past, are more similar to it than others. In his argument, the future described in future perfect terms is more similar to the past than the future de­scribed in simple future terms.

To consider the future, it may help to treat it like the past, that is, as ifit had already happened. This is the premise Weick proposed in his discussion of fu­ture perfect thinking (1979, pp. 195-200). Future perfect thinking is a gram­matical prescription instructing managers and planners and all who consider the future to do so in the future perfect tense. Thus rather than the simple fu­ture tense as used in a statement like “We shall overcome,” the future perfect128Eternal Horizonstense would have us say, “We shall have overcome.” Alfred Schutz believed that the “planned act bears the temporal character of pastness' (Schutzs emphasis), be­cause the actor projects the act as completed and in the past, a paradox that places the act in both the past and the future at the same time, something the future perfect tense makes possible (1967, p. 61). These were insights that Weick both noted (1979, p. 198) and built upon to explain why future perfect thinking may make it easier to envision possible futures.

synge

Becauseでしょう indicates guess, it can be used for current events and past events that we are not certain.

is

can not

because we exhaust

´s

question

will do

haven’t noticed

are

is

have

owns

s

are

were

could stop

’re

post

can

doesn’t happen

believes

are

oppose

can stop

tire

was

obtained

would be

might

can bemoan

can talk

is

tell

makes

look

should be

think

is

accept

can be

understand

let’s

lose

are

need

ask

does

will claim

takes

is

is

are

is

is

will hold

occurred

b a r k i n g