3,612 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2018
    1. (Anne-Mette Nortvig and René B. Christiansen, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, September 2017)

      Anyone know what's up with these links (couldn't highlight the links themselves but they all begin "educau.se/")? They're not internal EDUCAUSE links. Is EDUCAUSE providing access to this research? Or getting credit for sending people to it?

    1. Reagan described a four-credit course at the University of California at Davis on organizing demonstrations. "I figure that carrying a picket sign is sort of like, oh, a lot of things you pick up naturally," he said, "like learning how to swim by falling off the end of a dock."

      Wow! This is a recurring sentiment on the Right echoed in the mocking of Barack Obama as a "community activist."

    1. a university’s making its own values clear.

      I wonder if it's fair to apply this to a social media platform like Facebook (or Hypothesis) for that matter.

    2. The most important principle to uphold is the distinction between hearing someone and honoring someone.

      Valuable distinction.

    3. odious presidency

      This isn't really enough--I hated Bush. It's the explanation that follows that makes clear what lines have been crossed that make this presidency different.

    1. motto of Britain’s Royal Society, the world’s oldest national scientific institution — nullius in verba, Latin for "take no one’s word for it."

      I didn't know this and love it!

    2. replication efforts as "slapstick" psychology.


    3. "It’s not that I ever did him anything wrong. I just think he was fishing around for some way to make him a more notable figure," Zimbardo said of Blum in an interview. "And he hit on this." It was 1971. Philip G. Zimbardo, a psychologist at Stanford University, had just earned tenure, and he had completed a study he wanted the world to know about.


    1. Iwillhighlighthowrecentadvancesinadaptivelearning,learninganalytics,andsomepedagogiesclaimingtoempowerlearnerssometimesdotheopposite,orfallshortofachievingtheirobjective.

      I'd be interested in the positive version of this. What technologies out there are working for student empowerment.

  2. Jul 2018
    1. literary Facebook,

      We hear you younger students don't use Facebook anymore, so maybe imagine hypothes.is as a "literary Snapchat" or "literary Vine." (The above is what Buzzfeed thinks a Snapchat from Emily Dickinson would look like.)

    1. auto-provision them into, e.g. private groups allocated for use by courses or sections.

      But this is a different handshake then the one's described above, no?

    2. users who aren't restricted to 3rd-party namespaces

      Not true.

    3. their WordPress identities,

      It's unclear to me when these WP IDs exist and when they don't.

    4. per-instance-of-plugin basis

      Though in the case of the LMS app, the third part name space includes all instances of the LMS app across all LMSs.

    5. If step 1

      Yes, but wouldn't step 2 really be step 1 since that's what creates a set of users for H to create accounts for?

    6. use a user's university credentials to create and provision these accounts.

      So not through the LTI package?

    7. whether we can configure the hypothesis plugin for WordPress to implement a ‘third-party account’ using the reference implementation at https://github.com/hypothesis/publisher-account-test-site. If we’re successful with this, this may perhaps allow us to automatically create Hypothesis accounts when new Pressbooks accounts are created?

      This is the heart of it, I think.

      Is there some kind of necessarily user table in a given WP/PB instance?

    8. We’re running an instance of Pressbooks with the hypothesis plugin installed and networked activated. We want to have the option of giving users one login to gain access to both Pressbooks and Hypothesis (when the hypothesis plugin is installed and activated for a book).

      Should this be considered separately or firstly before adding the complexity of the LMS/LTI? That is thinking first of how PB users can have h accounts just on the web?

      Particularly in the edu context, how are accounts created for students using PB at other schools, not necessarily in the LMS?

  3. Jun 2018
    1. arguments scholars make about The Making of Americans are based on limited knowledge of the text’s underlying structure because the underlying patterns are difficult to discern with close reading.

      Human eye/analysis is limited. Technology enhances visibility.

    2. The first part introduces what Marjorie Perloff calls “differential reading,” which positions close and distant reading practices as both subjective and objective methodologies.

      Is New Historicism close or distant reading? The latter, right? But nonetheless deeply human, perhaps more so than "close reading" criticized as privileging text over lived reality.

    1. [edit] The choice tag is used to represent sections of text which might be encoded or tagged in more than one possible way. In the following example, based on one in the standard, choice is used twice, once to indicate an original and a corrected year and once to indicate an original and regularised spelling.[10]

      I love that this exists!

    1. Player A's role is to trick the interrogator into making the wrong decision, while player B attempts to assist the interrogator in making the right one.

      Why are these roles gendered, the man always dissembling, the woman assisting?

  4. May 2018
    1. untested

      Not likely. Not exactly. But the point is still important.

    2. In ed tech, schools are the customers, but students are the users.

      This is the central disconnect in my opinion. Companies and schools are both talking about what's right for students on a level, the sustainability of both institutions, that doesn't necessarily equate with what's right for teaching and learning.

    3. In the start-up world (including in ed tech), the true customer is the investor, who merely needs to be convinced the project is worth taking a flier on.

      I find the previous point more convincing. The article glosses over the processes/research necessary for a start-up to get SV funding not to mention grant-funding.

    4. Max Ventilla of AltSchool was previously “Head of Personalization” at Google. Jose Ferreira has a Harvard MBA and was managing director of new markets at Kaplan. Adam Braun of MissionU did have a connection to education, but it was as a fundraiser for his non-profit Pencils of Promise which focused on building schools in impoverished areas of foreign countries

      Not convinced that these resumes are causal in the failures of these projects.

    5. The story of someone who claims to be able to revolutionize a complex field without possessing relevant expertise seems to have some parallels in education technology.

      Fair point but more important is whether they've done their research, have folks on their team who have.

    1. as developer Vijith Assar puts it, “the content and mechanisms [of online annotations] could end up owned by a single for-profit tech startup.” Assar suggests an “open-source software project,” or something “handled by a standards body.”)


  5. Apr 2018
    1. Public support for higher education is declining—in both dollars and respect—while Silicon Valley companies and other for-profits have moved in. Put simply, colleges are following the money.

      And so innovation is moving in the wrong direction? Or at least colleges and universities are following the market, SI, instead of developing based on their needs.

    1. Rather than shun the "tyranny of relevance" — a concept within the liberal-arts community that refers to the need to demonstrate tangible benefits of humanities-research funding — we should embrace it.


    2. The need to understand the human dimensions and impacts of those advances, as well as the basis for making many of the ethical decisions that should guide their use, has never been greater.

      In fact, this is a very specific aspect of humanistic studies: technology studies and any and all related fields.

    1. First, what has happened, as in time that students spend on tasks, clicks and downloads. Second, what does it mean for a student’s learning, as both formative and summative assessment.

      All of this should be available to students themselves.

    1. But this framing also rises from our embrace of a technological solution to a pedagogical problem.

      Can't it be both? Techno-pedagogical? Or technological with a strong influence of pedagogical understanding?

    2. through a series of flipped switches and clicked buttons.

      This feels highly reductive of much of the technology that's developed around online learning.

    1. Turk.

      I wonder if there was something racial about this word choice? I'm thinking of Othello's self-referential last words:

      And say besides that in Aleppo once, Where a malignant and a turbaned Turk Beat a Venetian and traduced the state, I took by the throat the circumcisèd dog, And smote him, thus.

    2. Faculty members may not stipulate on the syllabus how they treat their students (although they probably should), but their practices are as much a form of pedagogy, and arguably more so, than any list of required texts, assignments, or due dates.

      Not following...

    3. Mechanical Turks of education technology

      Not exactly. Student labor in most of the examples given has been harvested as data for the improvement of their and other student experiences. Students have been made into Mechanical Turks of university bureaucracy? Again, consent is definitely at issue here. But I don't think it's simply corporate exploitation.

    4. all possible future uses of these data, since those uses are not fully known yet, or even knowable.


    5. corporate products

      Corporate here is used as a kind of trigger word--and there's a lot of slippage between academic and corporate throughout this piece. The above paragraph talks about a university's use of data to improve student retention.

    6. Arizona now uses some 800 data points — on academic performance, financial aid, and use of the university’s course-management system, among other things — to identify which students are most at risk for dropping out. Those predictions are about 73 percent accurate from the first day of classes, with the accuracy rate improving over time, according to a university official.

      Whether students consented to this data extraction aside, isn't this a good thing?

    7. information about me will be used to evaluate the behavior of other people is a question we don’t know how to ask very well.

      Again, I don't see how this knowledge structure is a problem. Putting aside AI and informed consent, if I'm teaching a class and students in one semester struggle with a concept, what's wrong with me adjusting my curriculum to better present it next time?

    8. When it comes to collecting student data, the notion of informed consent is simply not a part of the model.

      Don't disagree that it should be, but don't don't think this account captures the complexity of what's going on--or is presented in such a way that those who can make this change will care to listen to.

    9. That is the point of ideas like predictive analytics and plagiarism detection: using data generated by some people in the past to predict and understand the behavior of other people in the present or future.

      Doesn't this practice describe a wide range of academic fields? For example, ethnographic studies in sociology and anthropology are used by scholars to make larger claims about groups in human society.

    10. Such developments should make us question the growing number of education-technology practices now in place at colleges across the country.

      What development exactly? Microtask services? All AI? And all education technology?

    11. students often provide the raw material by which ed tech is developed,

      This is an incredibly broad statement. It doesn't need to be. Clearly there are technologies that are exploiting labor in this way. It's just not all ed tech.

  6. Mar 2018
    1. We normally acknowledge, however grudgingly, that writing must betaught and continue to be taught from high school to college and perhapsbeyond. We accept it, I believe, because we can see writing, and we know thatmuch of the writing we see is not good enough. But we do not see reading.We see some writing about reading, to be sure, but we do not see reading.

      It's not just reading that's invisible, it's all the pieces of the puzzle that make up the formal close reading/writing that goes into a college essay:

      • reading
      • annotations
      • class notes
      • class discussion
      • outlining
    1. Students are simply not in the same place at the same time anymore, and technological interventions can help recreate some of that social loss if managed effectively.

      Yes. Too often tech is seen as displacing the real, which it certainly can. But it can also extend the real when done right.

    2. Practitioners have to interpret the machine learning-based results. If not, universities are going to be driving their strategies toward machine learning-derived outcomes that might not impact student success.

      Well said.

    3. it still takes good old-fashioned qualitative work with faculty, staff and students to really understand the answer the machines might be giving us

      Absolutely. They just have more information upon which to advise.

    4. Instead of adaptive learning playing the role of supplemental tool -- and a very good one in many cases -- these technologies could be sold off as a cheaper, faster and less contentious road toward a credential that will support advancement in the future work force.

      While I wouldn't argue for circumventing a liberal arts education, politics is not the only reason a person in need of a college degree could benefit from alternative credentialing systems. I'm thinking here of students with full time jobs.

    1. Motel Raphael (2:30pm), Elliot and the Ghost (1:45pm), I Am Bearwood (1pm) at Austin Beer Garden Brewing Co. (1305 W. Oltorf) [1pm, free]

      nice sound

    1. this year

      This is part of what gets me. It's expected now that getting a tenure track job is a multiyear process with the new PhD filling in those years with various kinds of contingent labor.

    1. manual

      That's okay as long as we can generate them programatically...

    2. But third-party accounts currently don't have access to https://hypothes.is web pages, including the pages for creating and joining private groups.

      What if the process is automated though? That is, what if Canvas sends the H app information to create a group and it happens behind the scenes?

    3. you need a Public group to be the default one when the user isn't a member of any private groups

      This seems a problem. The overall group should be private.

    4. We considered giving third-party Canvas accounts their own set of groups that behave the same as first-party groups

      I think this is right.

    5. (e.g. "canvas" rather than "hypothes.is")

      Really, I think it should be "utexas.canvas".

    1. anyone can read the publisher group

      We CANNOT have this in the LMS environ. These annotations must be private.

    2. within the Canvas authority

      Within the *specific" Canvas authority? Ie. hypothesis.instructure.com?

    3. in an authority

      Does this mean a namespaced "group" like elife?

    4. When Hypothesis is launched within Canvas: The Canvas app should create a private group, within the Canvas authority, for the Canvas course that the Canvas app is currently being used in, if such a group doesn't already exist. The Canvas user (student or teacher) who has launched the Canvas app should automatically be a member of the group. The Hypothesis client should be locked to this "course group" in the groups dropdown menu.

      This sounds amazing! And, as I said, kills two birds with one stone: authentication and privacy.

  7. Feb 2018
    1. LaPierre ranted at the Conservative Political Action Conference, “If they seize power, if these so-called European socialists take over the House and the Senate, and God forbid they get the White House again, our American freedoms could be lost and our country will be changed forever.” If someone were mumbling like that at a bar, the bartender would be obligated to cut off his drinks.

      For real.

    1. It’s about giving students an opportunity that most of them will never have again in their lives: the chance for serious exploration of complicated intellectual problems, the gift of time in an institution where curiosity and discovery are the source of meaning.

      Okay, but how does a teacher, an institution evaluate whether or not this experience is being delivered? It's not like that's just working because colleges exists? In fact it's not working for lots of people it needs to work for most, no?...

    2. It means helping students immerse themselves in a body of knowledge, question assumptions about memory and orient themselves toward current events in a new way.

      Are these not skills and relatively measurable as well? Are they more experiences?

    3. “They need to be challenged and inspired by the idea of our disciplines.”

      Seems like this could lead to a disservice too, though. Like saying come marvel at our hallowed halls and be transformed in some vague way...

    4. No intellectual characteristic is too ineffable for assessment. Some schools use lengthy surveys like the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, which claims to test for qualities like “truthseeking” and “analyticity.”

      Thinking of @gardnercambell's work on "insight" here.

    5. All professors could benefit from serious conversations about what is and is not working in their classes. But instead they end up preoccupied with feeding the bureaucratic beast.

      Still not clear to me exactly where the slippage happens here?

    6. In 2006, the Commission on the Future of Higher Education, convened by Margaret Spellings, the secretary of education at the time, issued a scathing critique of American higher education. “Employers report repeatedly that many new graduates they hire are not prepared to work, lacking the critical thinking, writing and problem-solving skills needed in today’s workplaces,” the Spellings Commission report complained.

      I don't have the facts to back this up at the moment, but isn't this at the same time that "a college degree/education" was considered the single most important requirement for high quality employment?

    1. It can take days or weeks before anyone finds out what has been disseminated by social media software.

      If at all, right? Part of the problem is that there is no visibility into this algorithmic public sphere.

    1. There are few solutions to the problems of digital discourse that don’t involve huge trade-offs—and those are not choices for Mark Zuckerberg alone to make. These are deeply political decisions. In the 20th century, the US passed laws that outlawed lead in paint and gasoline, that defined how much privacy a landlord needs to give his tenants, and that determined how much a phone company can surveil its customers.

      Is the point here made clear enough: this should not just be a job for the tech companies, it needs to be more so government intervention?

    2. To be clear, no public sphere has ever fully achieved these ideal conditions—but at least they were ideals to fail from. Today’s engagement algorithms, by contrast, espouse no ideals about a healthy public sphere.

      Ideals, yes, but also simply guardrails.

    3. Facebook doesn’t just connect democracy-­loving Egyptian dissidents and fans of the videogame Civilization;

      But it DOES do this. Granted I need (and plan to) read the book, which I'm sure covers this point.

    4. almost

      Exactly? By design.

    5. no nutritional labels

      Great analogy re regulation.

    6. As Buzzfeed famously reported in November 2016, “top fake election news stories generated more total engagement on Facebook than top election stories from 19 major news outlets combined.”

      I of course already knew/heard this, but still audibly sighed when reading here.

    7. But at their core, their business is mundane: They’re ad brokers.

      Such an interesting point. In the end Silicon Valley is not all that innovative. They're doing what advertising has done for a century or more, just more efficiently.

    8. to a lesser extent, Twitter.

      Just by the numbers?

    9. algorithmic public sphere

      Great phrase.

    10. And sure, it is a golden age of free speech—if you can believe your lying eyes.

      Hashtag medialiteracy?

    1. And most importantly for the account with which I am directly concerned here, it skews against exactly the sort of collective and interactive dialogic and discursive analysis on which much learning across the human sciences depends.

      Does it? Even with interactive tools like Hypothesis?

      I value the power of face to face conversation above all else, but there's no doubt in my mind that various forms of interactive technology have occasioned conversation where there never could have been and extended and deepened conversation that has taken place in person.

    2. Humanities succeed as an institutional site, in the final analysis, only by making narrowly institutionalized humanities obsolete, by perhaps putting us out of business as an isolated, discrete institutional site and into the academy as engaged interlocutor pretty much across the curriculum.

      This is a fascinating point. I'd love to read a sci-fi novel or a university plan that enacts this vision. Imagine English professors embedded in engineering departments!!

    3. public value

      Totally agree about this--and even with its instrumentality, which David likely wouldn't--but would like to see this "value" more fully articulated.

    4. Not simply, note, truth to power, but truth in relation to power,

      I'm not following the distinction.

    5. public

      To me, this is the key, especially in so far as the humanities begins to engage broader publics in conversation and action.

      But also how is this different from the Nussbaum argument?

    6. agile

      Borrowed from Silicon Valley?

    7. Post-humanities speak to the ways in which the material and conceptual conditions establishing the conventions by which humanities once were structured and recognized no longer obtain.

      Hasn't this been the condition of the humanities for some time? Their disciplinary origin was centuries ago.

    8. The humanities require technological reflexivity and self-reflection as much as technology calls for critical humanistic engagement.

      Love this, though I'm not convinced that this work isn't being done to the degree claimed here.

    9. The point is to make out these values publicly in a much more robust and sustained way while also building curriculum more coherently, at least in part, around these capacities. Call this “diversifying the humanities portfolio.”

      I'd love an updated report on this work!

    10. Nevertheless, the fee revenue generated and the relatively low per student costs in educating students in at least the traditionally conceived humanities make them less the dependent family member than is often assumed (Newfield 2008), though the heightened cost of digital humanities now pulls somewhat in the counter-direction.

      This is interesting. If that's the case, are the humanities in crisis? Or can they just be left alone, like that uncle no one talks to but gets by on his own.

    11. the perception that in the past two decades academic humanities themselves became more introverted, more technical in language and modes of analysis, more specialized and self-concerned.

      This isn't real?



    13. Security itself actually is justified less as a public good than as a sort of baseline Hobbesian individual right, a more general right from which the right to bear arms is derivative, and that for which the state supposedly was socially contracted into existence. Even something as basic as health has been reduced to individualized, private concern: the virulent attacks on “Obamacare,” accordingly, have been fueled by its supposed intrusion upon individual freedoms.

      Well, this trend has certainly come to a head more recently (current admin taking away health care, building a wall).

    14. April 2014.

      I wish this publication info was higher up in the page.

    1. So what is it: publisher or platform? Facebook seems to have finally recognized that it is quite clearly both.

      Right. You really can't separate the two; it's a false choice to begin with. Every platform has an ethics or politics to it even if it's largely hidden from site.

    2. “interacting with people is positively correlated with a lot of measures of well-being, whereas passively consuming content online is less so.”

      This seems like good news for Hypothesis.

    3. Every publisher knows that, at best, they are sharecroppers on Facebook’s massive industrial farm. The social network is roughly 200 times more valuable than the Times.


    4. For years, The New York Times resented that Facebook helped elevate BuzzFeed; now BuzzFeed is angry about being displaced by clickbait.



    6. Trump’s candidacy also proved to be a wonderful tool for a new class of scammers pumping out massively viral and entirely fake stories.

      Another succinct account of the "abuse" of Facebook for misinformation during the 2018 election.

    7. Inside Facebook, almost everyone on the executive team wanted Clinton to win; but they knew that Trump was using the platform better.

      Was using the platform better? Or using a platform that was designed more for a certain kind of messaging and message that was unintentionally aligned with Trump's campaign/movement?

    8. The point was partly to get feedback.

      To address a problem that didn't exist. To a problem that was actually the very opposite (politically) of what was being addressed.

    9. Instead, Facebook spent the spring of 2016 very busily fending off accusations that it might influence the elections in a completely different way.

      There's something about the misdirection here that stands in for our (mostly the media's) misplaced attentions throughout this Trump era. We're constantly being pushed to attack or defend something that's slightly off where our real focus should be and in fact somehow undermines our ability to truly focus in on what the problem is...

    10. In early 2016, its security team noticed an uptick in Russian actors attempting to steal the credentials of journalists and public figures. Facebook reported this to the FBI.

      "Fake fake news"?

    11. neutrality is a choice in itself


    12. it’s hard to imagine how Facebook could exist if it were liable for the many billion pieces of content a day that users post on its site.


    13. Humans are social animals. But the internet is a cesspool. That scares people away from identifying themselves and putting personal details online. Solve that problem—make people feel safe to post—and they will share obsessively. Make the resulting database of privately shared information and personal connections available to advertisers, and that platform will become one of the most important media technologies of the early 21st century.

      Nice concise summation of the rise of Facebook!

    1. We will not require a child to provide more information than is reasonably necessary in order to participate in an online activity.
    2. We may disclose any and all personal information collected from a Child to the parent or teacher who registered for the service in connection with such Child.

      Is this the right thing?

    1. Operating it is not free. One of the steps that the organization made to save it from potential insolvency was to put a lot of the work behind a paywall. I don’t like it, but I get it. And it worked. The IMS appears to be much healthier now and has produced some of its best work in a very long time. Life is about trade-offs.

      Feel me

    2. I have been arguing for some time that Caliper should be used as a data interoperability exchange standard between apps that operates through the LTI window

      How does the whole Caliper thing relate to data H might generate?

    3. LTI Advantage can also enable the tool provider to give the LMS links that support single sign-on to specific places within the tool,
    4. then no amount of coolness will matter.

      What about rightness? Is there an ethical side to this conversation?

    5. multilateral trade agreements.

      Don't countries sometimes sign these for reasons besides pure capitalist interest?

    1. ’TWas’twas inin thethe TempleTemple wherewhere II firstfirst beheldbeheld herher,wln 0005AndAnd nownow agenagain thethe samesame, whatwhat OmenOmen yetyet


    1. your student roster in Perusall will automatically populate as students each launch into Perusall from the LMS for the first time.

      This is I believe what has been proposed by Atomic Jolt.

    2. create Perusall courses through the LMS

      Equivalent of groups?

    3. without having to log into Perusall separately

      the key!

    4. If they log in to Perusall directly (i.e., at perusall.com), then they will be seen as a second user.)

      I wonder why?

  8. Jan 2018
    1. Bryan E. Wagner

      Personal connection

    2. University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA) Literature in Context: An Open Anthology Project Director: John O'Brien Co-Project Director: Tonya Howe, Marymount University Co-Project Director: Christine Ruotolo, University of Virginia Outright: $72,542 To support: Development of a working prototype for an open-access, curated, and classroom-sourced digital anthology of British and American literature in English (1650-1800).

      Uses h in anthology

    1. can subside. Digital Humanities is still in its infancy. But its ability to serve as a driver of innovation could become threatened as “doing the humanities digitally” become


    2. created by working across media tends to collapse differences and create an illusion of frictionless exchangeability. We sit with books in front of us, typing notes into files, w




    1. learning pioneers would be able to experiment and innovate by hooking apps and other functions onto the LMS.

      Why not hook apps into multiple other systems via annotation infrastructure?

    1. understanding of science and their capacity for responsible work and citizenship

      Connection between STEM education and citizenship

    2. In the C.R.E.A.T.E. (Consider, read, elucidate hypotheses, Analyze and interpret data, think of the next experiment) approach (Hoskins et al., 2007), students learn to think of themselves as scientists

      Could be accomplished through annotation

    1. The Qualitative Data Repository (QDR) and Hypothesis have partnered to meet this challenge by developing a new way to cite, supplement, and share the data underpinning published work.
    1. ntelligent tutoring systems (ITS) and related activities that narrowly scope learning tasks

      What's the opposite of narrowly scoping learning tasks? Project based learning? Collaborative learning tasks? "Real-world" engagement with scientific knowledge production?

    2. STEM education research

      This is a big piece that's missing or needs to be better emphasized: how can OWA support STEM education research--the study of how learners learn STEM fields...

    1. This continued design effort will attempt to challenge the imposed artificial timeframes, so as to continually engage course alumni, nurture a sense of sustained community, and foster boundary-crossing across cohorts of students. When an LMS closes, learning could continue, so could connections formed in or for learning. 

      So cool!

    2. Slack provided a replacement of traditional threaded discussion forums

      So, Hypothesis/collaborative annotation is not a 1:1 replacement of discussion forum.

    3. In addition, to negotiate the public--private boundary, the designer-instructor allowed course registrants to annotate either publicly or in a private Hypothesis group---both using a same course hashtag (Goal 4).

      Wow. I would love to see in-depth data/analysis on just this!

    4. portability of posts not widely supported in threaded discussion forums (Goal 2)

      Key point. Hypothesis needs to make this possible within the client.

    5. tags could be used to bring together Hypothesis annotations that are potentially scattered in different webpages

      Do forums ever have a tagging feature?

    6. discourse of varied publicity---private in a dyad, public in a private group, public to external communities---could have their unique strengths in fostering cognitive, social, and cultural aspects of discourse.

      My question here is always about FERPA and general privacy concerns. I'm all for more public engagement by students, but aren't the forces of IT arrayed against this?

    7. While a traditional discussion forum is separated from the objects being discussed, a more powerful discourse environment is able to incorporate various web objects into discourse to maintain its contexts.

      Same could be said for page bottom comments in online newspapers/magazines.

    8. threading structure of discussion forums leads to branching and increasingly fragmented conversations, with repetition and duplication appearing in different threads

      Of course Hypothesis uses threading as well.

      But is threading really the issue? Isn't is more a matter of the correct "parenting" of forums and replies? It's part of the skill of discussion/discussion forums that student-users read other's posts and not repeat what has been said before...

    9. self-organization of discourse participants around ideas

      This authentic discourse is definitely better achieved via annotation in which students self-select passages to annotate and annotations to reply to.

    1. It’s just that with companies like West Louis, the seams show, literally and figuratively.

      Right, wouldn't a quick Google search have solved the mystery here? The difference between capital then and now is that now isn't relatively easy to find out if something's made poorly--everyone's reviewing everything. You can easily find out where something's made if you believe that matters. Back in the day all you had was a glossy ad and finding out if it really was a solid product required trying it on.

    2. What Ganon does is pick suppliers he’ll never know to ship products he’ll never touch. All his effort goes into creating ads to capture prospective customers, and then optimizing a digital environment that encourages them to buy whatever piece of crap he’s put in front of them.

      This is crazy!

    1. narrowly scope learning tasks;

      Not following the problem here. Does "narrow" mean too personalized?

    2. (a) learning management systems (LMS) or massively open online courses (MOOCs) that primarily organize, coordinate, and deliver resources (e.g., syllabi, video clips, quizzes);

      See EDUCAUSE/Bodong for lack of teaching and learning in LMS.

    3. diverse learners

      How does our vision address needs of "diverse learners"? By being so flexible and universal as to work in different contexts? Unique opportunities for intervention/feedback?...

    4. distributed digital environments

      By definition h works across and connects various platforms...

    5. adaptable

      How can we make our vision of an h-powered or h-centric learning environment "adaptable"?

    6. the design of the next generation of digital learning environments for science,

      What's different between the NGDLE for science and for other disciplines?

    1. students will work collectively to build scientific understanding

      Students as active producers of knowledge.

    2. bring school science into closer alignment with real-world science through deeper connections to public scientific discourse.

      Scientific literacy and research as a continuum. Involving undergrads, etc. in "real" science.

    1. embedding local examples

      Making them living, breathing books. Annotation can help here.

    2. permanent access to their course materials,

      And their notes.

    3. do not benefit personally from adopting a given publisher's book

      Though of course they likely get the book for free.

    1. NOTE for LTI providers: Since developer keys are scoped to the institution they are issued from, tool providers that serve multiple institutions should store and look up the correct developer key based on the launch parameters (eg. custom_canvas_api_domain) sent during the LTI launch. For open source Canvas users, you can generate a client ID and secret in the Site Admin account of your Canvas install.

      So this replaces the dev key creation process?

  9. Dec 2017
    1. Annotation made ideas that could have simply died in print live on and flourish collectively.

      I love this idea that annotation can breath life, collaborative and emergent, into academic writing.

    2. publicly available on the web annotation platform, Hypothesis,

      Hypothesis doesn't make it publicly available--we're not hosting the content. But in any case, it IS openly published which is the more important point.

  10. thecurrent.educatorinnovator.org thecurrent.educatorinnovator.org
    1. click the eyeball

    2. I prioritize reading first, and online discourse second

      As it should be. It's one of my bigger concerns about the use of collaborative annotation in education, that it will displace the text or at least encourage a kind of skimming of text via annotation.

  11. Nov 2017