Dr Ellie Murray. (2021, February 23). A thing I feel is weird about how we are all reacting to this pandemic: Mourning is still so individual & private. It surprises me there aren’t campaigns for armbands, ribbons, wreaths on doors, or some sort of flag in the window to say “a loved one was lost to COVID here”. [Tweet]. @EpiEllie. https://twitter.com/EpiEllie/status/1364033220904427524

The Aboriginal flag was developed in 1971 by Luritja artist Harold Thomas. Centering its importance to Aboriginal Australians, the sun appears in the middle of the flag.

It's subtle here, as in other instances, but notice that Hamacher gives the citation to the Indigenous artist that developed the flag and simultaneously underlines the source of visual information that is associated with the flag and the sun. It's not just the knowledge of the two things which are associated to each other, but they're also both associated with a person who is that source of knowledge.

Is this three-way association common in all Indigenous cultures? While names may be tricky for some, the visual image of a particular person's face, body, and presence is usually very memorable and thereby easy to attach to various forms of knowledge.

Does the person/source of knowledge form or act like an 'oral folder' for Indigenous knowledge?

Are we really contesting that?

Repeated sentence

Time in the US, School, High School, Fitting in/belonging

I think you mean: A neutral approach to probabilistic interactions would rely only on the effect of abundances and assume trait-matching would have no effect?

ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: ‘RT @factmata: We are excited to launch of a side project we worked on this summer—Https://t.co/2yGSgkqzTG. We scan Twitter profiles with…’ / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1323664538777124867

I think this might be confusing, as readers could think this is the actual framework of our paper. We could maybe precise that we could use our framework the other way around, by using our predictions of ecological networks and species interactions to make better predictions of species pools.

I think this definition of bipartite network is a little confusing. We could say something like:

"Bipartite networks are divided into two disjoint sets of species and interactions occur between members of different sets (e.g. plant-pollinator and host-parasite networks)"

you say twice there have been calls. Maybe simplify the sentence with something like: through probabilistic species pool, and more importantly ...

missing space

missing words

Semi- by curiosity, semi- because it might be better to explicitly say it, but how was accuracy calculated? It is not clear if correctly predicted absences are used? As stated before, there are no true negative.

The sentence is very hard to read. too many long noun strings.

Wow, this is so emblematic of the age... any person can taint another irrevocably with a flag!

And an accident cannot be undone!

Now when I screen share on Zoom to discuss our document, everyone will see a big red flag.

Hello world

Sathya, C. (2020, June 17). Pandemic-Related Gun Purchases Raise Suicide Risks. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pandemic-related-gun-purchases-raise-suicide-risks/

Does anybody know what this means?

J'aurais aimé savoir quel bleu et quel rouge sont utilisés sur le drapeau.