3 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2020
  2. ojs.uwindsor.ca ojs.uwindsor.ca
    A Normative Theory of Argument Strength
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 02 Sep 2020

      Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2006). A Normative Theory of Argument Strength. Informal Logic, 26(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v26i1.428

      is:article lang:en normative theory argument quality argument strength importance evidence fallacy Bayesian characteristics critical evaluation argument
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/428
  3. Jul 2020
  4. critical-analysis.org critical-analysis.org
    Project background – Critical Analysis Project
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 10 Jul 2020

      Project background – Critical Analysis Project. (n.d.). Retrieved July 10, 2020, from http://critical-analysis.org/project-background/

      is:webpage lang:en critical evaluation analysis argumentation communication complexity standard argument quality rationality research debate
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    critical-analysis.org/project-background/
  5. www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
    Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 07 Jul 2020

      Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation. (2020). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.004

      is:article lang:en argument quality argumentation real world psychology philosophy classical logic Bayesian framework standard evaluation guidance probability
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661320300206