TRSP Desirable Characteristics

TRSP Desirable Characteristics

The repository guarantees the authenticity of the digital objects and provides provenance information.

Guilt pride is something of a modern construction. Unlike Walsers, who experienced his guilt (because he served in WW2 under the Nazis), most Germans haven't experienced WW2. Guilt pride is thus an attempt to build a new collective identity for Germany, devoid of any authenticity (instead hinges more on profilicity).

Rotation event as authorization of below events.

^

^

17:00 authenticity runs against barriers, story not telling everything

• see on how stories/language can be limited

18:00 story as providing a lot (see symbolism as achieving this, telling something broader)

Is nothing truly original, then? (when it is just combinatorial)

By remixing, we make something new (if the ideas cross-pollinate in an intersection)

Multi-modal output can for now still suggest there's a human at work, not a generative agent. But multi-modal output can soon if not already also be generated. This still seems to focus on the output being the thing authenticated to identify human making. output that is connected to other generated output. There's still no link to things outside the output, into the authors life e.g. Can one fake the human process towards output, which is not a one-off thing (me writing this in a certain way), but a continuous and evolving thing (me writing this in a certain way as part of a certain information process, connected to certain of my work processes etc.). Seen from processes multi-modal output isn't a different media format, it is also work results, projects created, agency in the physical world. In those processes all output is an intermediate result. Because of those evolving processes my [[Blogs als avatar 20030731084659]]. Vgl [[Kunst-artefact is (tussen)uitkomst proces 20140505070232]] There was this article about an artist I can't find back that saw all his outputs over time as intermediate and expression of one narrative. This https://www.flickr.com/photos/tonz/52849988531/in/datetaken/ comes to mind to. Provenance and entanglement as indicators of authenticity.

Belgian artist Dries Depoorter (he als did the face and mobile detection of MEPs during debates about face recog I think) has a project where he matches influencer posted images with footage from public videocams where they took that image. And how long it takes to take that 'casual shot of me in front of some landmark'. Aptly called 'The follower'

Useful and likely human written texts show the richness of the context it results from, by showing and linking. Not just to/with 1) other texts, but also 2) other actions (things created, data gathering, experiments, tools adapted) and 3) people (that provided input, you look at, interact with outside the text). Even if such things were generated following up those leads should show its inauthenticity.

A text is a result of work, next to itself being work to write it. A text that does not show any of the work that led to writing a text is suspect. Does a text reflect an exploration that it annotates? Does it show social connections, include data points, external examples, artefacts created alongside the text (e.g. lists), references to the wider context/system of what the text discusses, experimental actions.

Relevant links in a text are a sign of the context the text emerged from, and the conversation it is situated in. Lack of such links or references is a potential sign of inauthentic texts (generated or not)

Yesterday, I met Gil Agnew, who has been focusing on the Angel of Wholeness.

Link to Markey Ad.

But they're ADs! Why do people today see authenticity in something so obviously inauthentic? Is it the natural result of "social media"?

Mills, J. P. (2020). Authentic Arseholes and the Problem with Transformational Leaders [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5zfcs

Agreed! I'm disheartened by advice some teachers, especially those new to the profession, get to avoid smiling until March because doing so would erode their authority.

again with the authenticity

She seems to really care about authenticity in rhetoric.

This quote needs an image too. So true.

contribute thoughtfully, connect kindly, and go boldly... I think Troy's words here are the umbrella goal. Don't you?

I think the "lifelessness" of recordings is maybe too extreme. It makes sense, but it overly simplifies original and recordings, possibly by neglecting agency of the audience? What would we call a reproduction of a song only ever heard live, and only ever performed live? Is that live performance of another's live song then dead, because it is attempting to reproduce an ephemeral moment, but is also itself an ephemeral moment? I think this complicates the binary, but I'm not sure lol

Those of us who see forward believe this; in the factory model schools, teachers see no reason to share. I fear this is still more common than not.

Unfortunately, that then extends to students. School is artificial with little authenticity.

Gah! Awful.

As soon as you think such a signal is valuable, it becomes a tool of deception.

That's why we've seen some backlash against flashy promotion toward a nostalgic, faux low budget, "authentic" aesthetic.