- Sep 2024
-
bugs.ruby-lang.org bugs.ruby-lang.org
-
Sure, it is not needed, we can always write things in a different way. As a matter of fact, with such an argument, hardly any improvement should be accepted.
-
- Jun 2024
-
-
it's very abstract to break life into boxes and create supposedly linear causal processes
for - book - Combining - rationale for title
book - Combining - rationale for title - Combining is the opposite of breaking apart and analysis
-
that's why it's called combining because you as a reader are combining um just like you do when you listen to a piece of music
for - book - Combining - rationale of title
book - Combining - rationale of title - The person who buys the book interacts with it in a unique way - based on their unique lebenswelt, meaningverse and perspectival knowing of reality
-
- Apr 2024
-
english.stackexchange.com english.stackexchange.com
-
Why do they follow these nouns? Sometimes it is imperative for them to follow the nouns they modify. For example, in your example, there's a difference between "proper reptiles" and "reptiles proper"
-
- Mar 2023
-
blog.cmpxchg8b.com blog.cmpxchg8b.com
-
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Seat belts aren’t perfect either, do you argue we shouldn’t wear them? Etc, etc. This argument only works if what you’re defending is good. As I’ve already explained, SMS-2FA is not good.
-
- Feb 2023
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
Result of lots of searching on net is that pre-checkout hook in git is not implemented yet. The reason can be: There is no practical use. I do have a case It can be achieved by any other means. Please tell me how? Its too difficult to implement. I don't think this is a valid reason
-
- Mar 2022
-
www.science.org www.science.org
-
Altmann, D. M., & Boyton, R. J. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination: The road ahead. Science, 375(6585), 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn1755
-
- Nov 2021
-
www.varvet.com www.varvet.com
-
so let me explain why this decision was reached and what your options are for the future.
-
wait_until was removed for several reasons:
-
- Aug 2021
-
www.ruby-lang.org www.ruby-lang.org
-
The automatic conversion not only confuses people but also makes the method less extensible. See [Feature #14183] for more details about the reasons for the change in behavior, and why certain implementation choices were made.
-
- Jun 2021
-
www.mutuallyhuman.com www.mutuallyhuman.com
-
We used testing tools that were in the same ecosystem as our backend technology stack for primrily three reasons: We owned both ends of the stack Team experience Interacting with the database
-
- May 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
We certainly wouldn't want to add non-standard appendages to the fetch API, partly because it's confusing but mostly because it would be repetitious; you would need to include that logic in every load function that used the API in question.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
None of the existing repository filtering tools did what I wanted; they all came up short for my needs. No tool provided any of the first eight traits below I wanted, and all failed to provide at least one of the last four traits as well:
-
- Mar 2021
-
danallosso.substack.com danallosso.substack.com
-
are just discovering it,
I know exactly what you mean. My experience? There are very few tools worth adopting for the long haul, ones that repay the time invested. Hypothes.is is a worthwhile investment of time and talent. I would not advocate for its use to my students if I did not think it was a net gain in the brain.
-
- Feb 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
I don't think seeing it in Rails PRs naturally means we should do it blankly. Put it another way, what's the justification in those PRs for doing it?
Tags
- understand the ramifications/effects/consequences
- rationale
- why?
- justification for existence
- doing something without knowing why/how it works
- investing time to really understand something
- understand both sides of an issue
- fallacy: doing something because it's popular / everyone is doing it
- understand the trade-offs
Annotators
URL
-
- Oct 2020
-
-
I agree that "it feels gross" is a bad reason. "not paving a bad cowpath" is a much better reason.
-
-
medium.com medium.com
-
Moreover, React team even removed the “highlight updates” feature from dev tools because people used to obsessively haunt wasted renders with no reasoning behind it
-
- Aug 2020
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Jittrapirom, P., & Tanaksaranond, G. (2020). An exploratory survey on the perceived risk of COVID-19 and travelling [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/v3g5d
-
- May 2020
-
www.investopedia.com www.investopedia.com
-
machines must weigh the consequences of any action they take, as each action will impact the end result
-
- Mar 2020
-
searchengineland.com searchengineland.com
-
the feature was dropped to “lack of use.”
I don't find the reason "lack of use" sufficient in its own right. (I personally didn't use this feature.) People might not use it because they don't know about. And those that do use may find it extremely useful; it's not their fault if others don't know about it or use. It seems to discriminate a bit against the minority who may use a useful feature. They would rather be in the majority, safe from having one of their favorite features removed.
But I do understand and appreciate the good explanation given below.
-
- Dec 2019
-
unix.stackexchange.com unix.stackexchange.com
-
The main benefit I can see to having .bashrc sourced when running a (non-interactive) remote command is that shell functions can be run. However, most of the commands in a typical .bashrc are only relevant in an interactive shell
-
- Nov 2019
-
reasonml.github.io reasonml.github.io
-
Many backing languages would satisfy the previous section's points; the points below, however, have been deal-breakers in our considerations.
-
The ability to render to native code. OCaml's native (assembly) startup time is in single digit milliseconds. We have big plans to use Reason on native one day; meanwhile, we're focusing on adoption through great JavaScript compatibility.
-
- May 2018
-
www.irrodl.org www.irrodl.org
-
The literature on open textbooks so far suggests that: (1) students are spending a significant amount of money on commercial textbooks; (2) it is likely they could achieve the same or better learning outcomes if their courses assigned open textbooks (keeping in mind the caveats above noted by Hilton, 2016); (3) students appear to be using open textbooks at the same rate as they use traditional textbooks; and (4) students overwhelmingly rate the quality of open textbooks to be just as high or higher than that of traditional textbooks. Overall, then, the picture emerging from the research suggests that assigning open textbooks in post-secondary courses is likely to provide the same benefits as commercial textbooks at no cost (or a fraction of the cost, for print versions).
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2017
-
www.tryscribble.com www.tryscribble.com
-
The approach you're probably using to train with could be improved by nearly 70%!
-
- Feb 2014
-
www.lexisnexis.com www.lexisnexis.com
-
What rationale is important to include in a brief? This is probably the most difficult aspect of the case to determine. Remember that everything that is discussed may have been relevant to the judge, but it is not necessarily relevant to the rationale of the decision. The goal is to remind yourself of the basic reasoning that the court used to come to its decision and the key factors that made the decision favor one side or the other.
Extraction. What rationale is important to include in a brief?
-
-
www2.gsu.edu www2.gsu.edu
-
Reasoning The reasoning gives the reader insight into how the court arrived at its decision. It is instructive in nature. Courts often back their holdings with several lines of reasoning, each of which should be summarized in this section. Unnecessary repetition of facts or the issue should be avoided. A court�s rationale for its holding might be a simple explanation of its thought process. Alternatively, the reasoning might be based on the plain language of the statute, Congressional intent, the re-enactment doctrine, or other common means of resolving judicial disputes.
Several lines of reasoning may be used to back the Court's holdings and may be:
- a simple explanation of the Court's thought processes
- based on the plain language of the statute
- congressional intent
- re-enactment doctrine
- other common means of resolving judicial disputes (what are those?)
-