893 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2021
    1. If part of your job is to deal with a large amount of incoming, you actually need to respond in a timely manner and not let people down

      A huge part of this workflow is managing the incoming information so you're not overwhelmed by it. So you need systems for that.

    2. In your old post you talked about Arnold Schwarzenegger’s open calendar and the upside of having unstructured time in your day and the flexibility you get with that. When Arnold did that interview I think he was in “entrepreneur mode”. At the time he was engaged in lots of entrepreneurial projects and starting lots of new businesses.

      See Maker and manager scheduling (http://paulgraham.com/makersschedule.html).

    3. t’s more by week than by day. The day of the week determines a lot. Monday and Friday have very specific schedules because we run in the rhythm of a venture capital firm

      Time batching and day theming.

  2. Jan 2021
    1. “It’s worth keeping in mind,” he says, “that revving the creative engine to fire at higher speeds . . . means more ideas and more experiments, which also means, inevitably, more failed experiments.”

      Before you have can a good idea you need to have lots of ideas.

    2. Most accidents never end up being profitable or valuable in a measurable way. But they’re necessary because they’re part of the process of developing something new. Accidents fuel creativity.

      In the same way that most random mutations in DNA have no effect, or detrimental effects, every now and again a random mutation increases survival fitness.

    1. patients clearly feel that the process of telemedicine (logistical things like ease of scheduling and making audio/video connections) falls short: while 89% of patients would recommend their provider after having had a telemedicine visit, only 76% of patients would recommend a video visit following a telemedicine visit.

      While F2F interactions may be coloured primarily by the quality of your care, or the cleanliness of your practice, or the helpfulness of your staff, online interactions may be influenced by things completely out of your control e.g. the patient's internet connection, or the quality of the image from their webcam.

    2. attitudes moving from, This provider must not think my problem is important since they are seeing me via telehealth, to This provider cares about me and therefore is seeing me via telehealth.”

      The patient's beliefs around telehealth are going to inform their perceptions of the clinician's level of care.

    3. Among the reasons the telehealth connection seems to resonate with patients is that providers can actually seem more attentive on-screen. One patient commented that while her doctor always seemed distracted by a computer screen during in-person visits, during video visits the doctor looked directly at her.

      Or, more accurately, the doctor was looking at his screen. His email client may have been open and positioned over the patient's face, and it would appear to the patient that he was very attentive.

    1. As new models of care emerge, decision-makers will need to determine where to draw the line between the need for in-person visits versus telecare visits. Hybrid models that combine in-person visits with telecare could improve the efficiency of care and increase patient engagement and convenience while maintaining aspects of the physician-patient relationship for which in-person visits are essential. Providers will also need to pilot different models of timing and length of appointments with telemedicine. Compared to infrequent in-person visits of longer duration, telecare can allow for shorter regular visits to, for example, monitor the impact of a new medication change or to assess prognosis following a hospitalization.

      How will clinicians change their core practices as a result of the changes introduced by telehealth? Will we have the critical awareness to challenge our taken-for-granted assumptions about beliefs that are fundamental to what we do, but which are little more than tradition and legacy.

    2. a thorough onboarding process is more likely to lead to successful adoption of new technologies by older adults

      Will GPs have to develop onboarding processes for new patients? Will these be standardised?

    3. clinics have developed a protocol that requires an initial inventory of what technology is available to each patient, what device they find easiest to use (older adults frequently prefer tablets over computers or smartphones), and what teleconferencing platforms, if any, they are familiar with.

      Are we preparing clinicians to help them prepare patients? What assumptions are we making about patients' levels of digital literacy? Device ownership? Connectivity?

    4. The model should be tailored to each individual based on what technologies they have access to and proficiency with.

      Alternative approaches see software developers looking to build all-in-one services that require patients and clinicians to learn how to navigate them. By adapting to meet the patient where they're most comfortable, clinicians are likely to have better client satisfaction but may themselves need to adapt.

    1. he told me that what he really liked was solving problems. To me the exercises at the end of each chapter in a math textbook represent work, or at best a way to reinforce what you learned in that chapter. To him the problems were the reward. The text of each chapter was just some advice about solving them.

      Changing your mindset can sometimes change everything.

    1. Revisit your favorite readings, videos, or discussions from your field.

      You'll often find deeper wisdom and further opportunities for learning when you come back to the classics. Important work is important because it has depth.

    2. Approach your work without expectations of the result.

      Love the process, not the product.

    3. Branch out into adjacent fields for inspiration and new perspectives.

      This is the goal of keeping a digital garden.

    4. Maintain a ‘Beginner’s Mind.’ The concept of “Shoshin” or “Beginner’s Mind” originates from Zen Buddhism. It asks people to practice going through life with a sense of openness and to avoid being jaded with expectations and preconceived notions. Or as Steve Jobs put it: “stay hungry, stay foolish”.

      Hungry in your pursuit of changing the world. Foolish enough to believe it's possible.

    5. If you’re doing it correctly, you’ll often feel like a beginner over and over again

      Waitzkin: "beginner's mind".

    6. Rather than moving in a straight line, you’ll experience a rapid spurt of skill development followed by lulls of stagnation or even regression.These plateaus can last weeks, months or even years. As we watch peers brush past us and feel our own passion fade away, it can be tempting to give up on our deliberate practice and forgo the path of mastery all together.

      Recognise that your goal of achieving mastery in a practice isn't some kind of race against others; it's not even a race against yourself. It's not a race at all.

    7. Ignore DistractionThe distractions of everyday work and life have a way of whittling hours from the little time you do have. Waitzkin bemoans a culture that emphasizes distraction over focus:“Our obstacle is that we live in an attention-deficit culture. We are bombarded with more and more information on television, radio, cell phones, video games, the Internet. The constant supply of stimulus has the potential to turn us into addicts, always hungering for something new and prefabricated to keep us entertained.”

      Avoid social media.

    8. Ascending fields often means working closely with collaborators. You’ll curtail your success if you can’t effectively work well with others.

      You can't achieve mastery on your own. You need to share and collaborate with others.

    9. Our greatest power over resistance is knowing of its existence and the many forms it can take: complacency, stagnation, distraction, emotional turmoil, rejection, and burnout

      All the reasons that you avoid "doing the work" (Pressfield, Do the work).

    10. Failure is uncomfortable and makes us feel weak and powerless. It brings us back to feeling like a novice, erasing all the hard work we’ve done.

      I think that Waitzkin refers to this as "beginner's mind".

    11. Greene describes this willingness to put ourselves out there as the “Experimentation” or “The Active Mode”. He suggests the following:“Expose your work to the public for active feedback. If you wait until you’re ready, you’ll never be ready.”

      A bit like what we're trying to do with In Beta.

    12. A senior peer you admire may bring up a key error you’ve made, leaving you embarrassed. On the path to mastery, get comfortable with this feeling of failure.

      Don't only get comfortable with it when it happens; seek it out.

    13. setting goals and milestones can spur your progress forward

      Set arbitrary goals to push you to make progress in your practice. It's too easy to become complacent and convince yourself that you'll do it tomorrow.

    14. “A competitor needs to be process-oriented, always looking for stronger opponents to spur growth, but it is also important to keep on winning enough to maintain confidence.”

      You need to find learning opportunities that allow you to practice just outside of your comfort zone.

    15. However, most performance experts say real-life mentorship is the gold standard. Leonard echoes this sentiment:“Instruction comes in many forms. For mastering most skills, there’s nothing better than being in the hands of a master teacher, either one-to-one or in a small group. But there are also books, films, tapes, computer learning programs, computerized simulators (flight simulators, for example), group instruction, the classroom, knowledgeable friends, counselors, business associates, even “the street.” Still, the individual teacher or coach can serve as a standard for all forms of instruction, the first and brightest beacon on the journey of mastery.”

      How do you create a learning community?

    16. Often the people whose skills you want to acquire are a click away, sharing their thoughts in an interview or tweeting about the early failures they faced in their career.

      I often wonder if it's worth spending time blogging or sharing my thoughts anywhere; of what value is it? But maybe by sharing I'm answering questions that other people have.

    17. erform self-assessments. Something that separates amateurs from masters is their insistence on regular self-assessment.

      You need to keep writing metrics, if writing is the thing you want to get better at.

    18. There’s comfort in practicing what we’re good at, like using the same narrative arc while writing a short story or studying the scientific theories we’re already familiar with. It’s only when we expose ourselves to the uncomfortable sensation of feeling stupid or incompetent that we grow.

      Coming back to this idea that you have to know your weaknesses in order to improve. It's only by working on areas that you find challenging, that you grow.

    19. Greene encourages us to embrace the slog:“Second, the initial stages of learning a skill invariably involve tedium. Yet rather than avoiding this inevitable tedium, you must accept and embrace it. The pain and boredom we experience in the initial stage of learning a skill toughens our minds, much like physical exercise. Too many people believe that everything must be pleasurable in life, which makes them constantly search for distractions and short-circuits the learning process.”

      You have to love the process. Everyone loves the product but if you don't love the process you'll never produce anything that anyone cares about.

    20. By making constant and non-negotiable space in your schedule for deliberate practice, you can continue along the path of mastery even when other priorities arise.

      Like setting aside the first hour (or two) of each day to focus on your practice.

    21. Deliberate practice is focused and forces you to direct your attention, again and again, towards improving your weaknesses.

      Not to be confused with the earlier point about ignoring your weaknesses. That point was about avoiding spending time on things that you don't enjoy or that aren't part of your mastery journey. This point is about improving specific aspects of the practice you're looking to master.

    22. Greene’s advice on making your deliberate practice valuable:“The key, then, to attaining this higher level of intelligence is to make our years of study qualitatively rich. We don’t simply absorb information — we internalize it and make it our own by finding some way to put this knowledge to practical use.”

      You need to find (or create) opportunities to put into practice what you've learned. Knowledge that moves you towards mastery must be useful.

    23. you’re the average of the five people you spend the most time with. Seek out people you can learn from. Welcome the opportunity of being the dumbest person in your circle of acquaintances

      If you're the smartest person in the room then you may be in the wrong room.

    24. Greene describes the importance of this mindset on the path to mastery:“…value learning above everything else. This will lead you to all of the right choices. You will opt for the situation that will give you the most opportunities to learn, particularly with hands-on work.”

      It might also be worth spending a lot of time learning how to learn.

    25. Your syllabus should be bottomless. Always add more to it. One insightful book may reference another that you need to devour. An artist who inspires you may cite their influences, leading you down another rabbit hole.

      Avoid looking for the quick and easily digestible content on blogs and social media. Find the difficult works that will form a natural barrier to others pursuing the same goal. If you can master hard things, it makes it that much harder for others to follow in your path.

    26. If you want to go into advertising, study David Ogilvy. If you want to study design, ingest the work of Dieter Rams. To understand nature writing, read Rachel Carson. Build a foundation of knowledge that includes the classics of your field.

      This also helps you to learn what has already been done. There's wisdom in ideas that are still around; there's a reason that people still refer to Seneca.

    27. Greene provides this poignant description of how our dreams may diminish as we move from adolescence to adulthood:“You possess a kind of inner force that seeks to guide you toward your Life’s Task—what you are meant to accomplish in the time that you have to live. In childhood this force was clear to you. It directed you toward activities and subjects that fit your natural inclinations, that sparked a curiosity that was deep and primal. In the intervening years, the force tends to fade in and out as you listen more to parents and peers, to the daily anxieties that wear away at you. This can be the source of your unhappiness—your lack of connection to who you are and what makes you unique. The first move toward mastery is always inward—learning who you really are and reconnecting with that innate force. Knowing it with clarity, you will find your way to the proper career path and everything else will fall into place.”Reflecting on what we loved to do as children can be a powerful exercise that brings us closer to the master’s path.

      It's something you feel compelled to do.

    28. Life’s Task

      What is my life's task?

    29. Ten thousand hours is a non-trivial amount of your life to set towards a singular focus

      No matter what the specific timeframe is, you need to recognise that this is going to take both time and effort. You'll probably have to give something up to make space in your week.

    30. given your weekly schedule

      If something is important to you, and getting better is at least partly a function of the time you spend getting better, it follows that you need to carve out more time for it. So rather than looking at your schedule to see where you fit your practice in, start by asking how much practice you want or need, and then reworking your schedule around that.

    31. Greene suggests that achieving mastery might take around 10,000 hours. Malcom Gladwell echoes this in his book, Outliers, citing studies and examples of world class performers that indicate 10,000 hours is the “magic number of greatness”. The precise number of hours required to reach mastery is a cause of controversy, and other performance experts have noted that it’s the quality of practice that’s important, not the amount. It’s also important to note that not all hours are equal. Hours 1-100 will be much less effective than hours 8000-8100.

      It might be more useful to focus on concrete improvements in specific areas of practice, rather than on the number of hours.

      It should suffice to know that achieving mastery will probably take decades and not months or year.

    32. Mastery often means toiling for years in obscurity, learning the basics of your field, and slowly making the transition from novice to master.

      And if you spend this time constantly looking for external reward, it's likely going to get tedious quickly.

    33. If you stay the path, you’ll likely work with brilliant people, have enriching conversations, and produce acclaimed work. View these rewards as a byproduct of mastery, not its final form.

      Over time your pursuit of mastery becomes it's own reward.

    34. While mastery often leads to professional success and money, pursuing mastery for those reasons is self-defeating

      Internal goals and motivation are more sustainable in the long-term.

    35. Greene summarizes the sensation of mastery as “the feeling that we have a greater command of reality, other people, and ourselves.” He adds that a master at work often experiences a “feeling of power”, “exceptional creativity”, and a “sense of control”. Experiencing mastery is turning away from distraction and getting lost in the feeling of sharpening our skills, honing our intuition, and applying our knowledge to our work.

      There's a qualitative component to the feeling of having mastered a skill or process.

    36. flow

      Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (1st edition). Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

    37. “Mastery is not about perfection. It’s about a process, a journey. The master is the one who stays on the path day after day, year after year. The master is the one who is willing to try, and fail, and try again, for as long as he or she lives.”

      You're never finished. You can always improve.

    38. “Mastery is not a function of genius or talent. It is a function of time and intense focus applied to a particular field of knowledge.”

      Process over product.

    39. That’s not to say that genetics isn’t real or important — the proclivities and traits you’re born with are a natural starting point for mastery

      Someone who is short simply isn't going to be a professional basketball player. Obviously anyone can enjoy - and be good at - basketball; but only tall people master it.

    40. It’s not a synonym for genius or giftedness. Those kinds of words suggest that greatness lies beyond our control.

      Mastery is a set of skills that you can get better at.

    41. mastery is the years and decades of learning, practice, failure, and hard-fought improvement that lead individuals toward unmatched greatness

      We tend to label something as "masterful" when we see it, but we only see the product and not the process. But it's the process that matters.

    1. Introduce students to the “explode to explain” strategy. When students “explode to explain,” they closely read a key sentence or two in a source, annotate, and practice explaining what they are thinking and learning.

      This is a specific strategy to include in an active reading session.

    1. But if something opens the drawer and takes out a block and says, “I just opened a drawer and took out a block,” it’s hard to say it doesn’t understand what it’s doing.

      This depends entirely on how you define "understand". Is there a difference between something behaving as if it understands, and actually understanding?

    1. unlike a traditional computer, a blockchain computer can offer strong trust guarantees, rooted in the mathematical and game-theoretic properties of the system. A user or developer can trust that a piece of code running on a blockchain computer will continue to behave as designed, even if individual participants in the network change their motivations or try to subvert the system. This means that the control of a blockchain computer can be placed in the hands of a community
    1. They have backed the Australian government into a corner, and now the government has no option but to reject their bullying threats and move forward with the code, or surrender our democratic processes to big tech

      I'm not sure why there's a need for all the bluster. Google can leave the country and Australia will be just fine.

    2. they ultimately put their commercial interests ahead of the democratic processes of the nations they operate in

      This seems weird. Google has a fiduciary responsibility to make money for their shareholders. Yes, they should put their commercial interest first.

      Because it's a bullshit argument to say that it's "profit" OR "democracy". This simply isn't true. Google is not synonymous with democracy and to say that it is is not helping the argument.

    3. Is the company willing to blockade the entire Google ecosystem to spite Australia?

      Let them. Then Australians can show the world that life goes on without Google. They can demonstrate just how effective the alternatives are. Then people will voluntarily stop using Google. Then Google changes it's business model or goes away.

    4. What would become of other services like Google Maps, Google Docs and Gmail

      There are plenty of mapping, collaborative writing, and email options available.

    5. There is no doubt that the implications of pulling Google Search in Australia would be huge

      How so? Millions of well-functioning people in first-world, high-functioning democracies get by just fine without Google search.

    6. with Google having a monthly audience of 19 million and Facebook 17 million in Australia alone

      What happens if Google did pull out of Australia? And then imagine the UK adopted a similar law, and Google pulled out of the UK. Then other EU countries. At what point does Google start losing enough money because no-one is looking at ads on their services? Google exists to display ads, which they can only do when people use their products. I'd love to see someone call this bluff.

    7. For most Australians, Google and Facebook are the internet, or at the very least, the key gateway to it

      If Google and Facebook pulled out of Australia, I imagine it would be like a soothing balm. People would learn how many other useful and interesting tools are available for surfacing news.

    8. content is accessible to everyone, distribution is fair and democratic, and no one platform or provider has unfair advantage

      It seems weird that these two are saying that Google and Facebook are somehow bulwarks against the tide of single platforms dominating everything...wait, what?

      Again, Google and Facebook surface content that is created elsewhere. We can get the content without Google and Facebook. DuckDuckGo (among others) is awesome. And the filter bubble of Facebook is partly responsible for the insanity that's been unfolding in America.

    9. Tim Berners-Lee (the inventor of the web) and Vint Cerf (the “father of the internet” turned Google executive), both made submissions to the Senate inquiry

      This makes me sad. I thought these two were better than this.

    10. disinformation online

      Absolutely. And this was accelerated and supported by Google and Facebook. Misinformation flows faster because of these companies.

    11. This is happening in an environment where credible news and public interest journalism is more important than ever - providing accurate and timely information during crises like last summer’s Australian bushfires and throughout the public health challenges of the global pandemic

      This is absolutely true. It is also true that none of these things requires Google or Facebook.

    12. Facebook too reinforced earlier threats to prevent Australian users sharing news

      Because there's no other way that news could be shared, right?

    13. bombshell

      Again, melodrama. Is The Guardian also guilty of sensationalising news?

    14. social media

      Is Google a social media platform?

    15. catastrophic impact on the news media

      It's a bit more nuanced. We're the ones who want free stuff, which drives the advertising model, which incentivises clicks. Google is the dealer but we're the addicts.

    16. chilling to anyone who cares about democracy

      This is a bit melodramatic. This is a search engine we're talking about. Actually, it's an advertising and marketing company, who also does search.

    1. Keep your identity small

      Blog post by Paul Graham (http://www.paulgraham.com/identity.html)

    2. Learn keyboard shortcuts. They’re easy to learn and you’ll get tasks done faster and easier

      I've recently started doing this and it's true.

    3. How you spend every day is how you spend your life
    4. Remember that you are dying
    1. To solve this problem, the mind creates maps of reality in order to understand it, because the only way we can process the complexity of reality is through abstraction

      We have to reduce complexity to concepts we can work with.

    1. Despite some implementation challenges, patient portals have allowed millions of patients to access to their medical records, read physicians’ notes, message providers, and contribute valuable information and corrections.

      I wonder if patients have edit - or at least, flag - information in their record?

    1. Leadership is not necessarily coming up with all the answers

      Not only does this mean that you have to work with your team but it also takes the pressure off of you to always come up with the solutions to everyone else's problems. By all means, give input if you're asked but don't feel pressured to provide answers to all questions.

      When you answer a question, people will feel like the decision has been made and further discussion will be closed off.

    1. Help is coming in the form of specialized AI processors that can execute computations more efficiently and optimization techniques, such as model compression and cross-compilation, that reduce the number of computations needed. But it’s not clear what the shape of the efficiency curve will look like. In many problem domains, exponentially more processing and data are needed to get incrementally more accuracy. This means – as we’ve noted before – that model complexity is growing at an incredible rate, and it’s unlikely processors will be able to keep up. Moore’s Law is not enough. (For example, the compute resources required to train state-of-the-art AI models has grown over 300,000x since 2012, while the transistor count of NVIDIA GPUs has grown only ~4x!) Distributed computing is a compelling solution to this problem, but it primarily addresses speed – not cost.
    2. artificial intelligence seems to be the future of software

      Is this because AI will write the software? At some point the programmes (and data they need) will be too complex for human beings to understand.

    1. Ideas cause ideas and help evolve new ideas. They interact with each other and with other mental forces in the same brain, in neighboring brains, and thanks to global communication, in far distant, foreign brains.

      Steven Pinker said that writing is a way for one mind to cause ideas to happen in other minds.

    1. the commonplace book has been particularly beloved by poets, whose business is the revelation of wholeness through the fragmentary

      Gestalt: the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. See also, emergence in chaos theory and complexity.

    2. Long before there was the Internet, there was the commonplace book — a creative and intellectual ledger of fragmentary inspirations, which a writer would collect from other books and copy into a notebook, often alongside his or her reflections and riffs. These borrowed ideas are in dialogue with the writer’s own imagination and foment it into original thinking. Over long enough a period of time — years, decades, often a lifetime — the commonplace book, while composed primarily of copied passages, comes to radiate the singular sensibility of its keeper: beliefs are refined, ideas incubated, intellectual fixations fleshed out, and the outlines of a personhood revealed. (Brain Pickings is, in an unshakable sense, a commonplace book.)
    1. Joy is not a function of a life free of friction and frustration, but a function of focus — an inner elevation by the fulcrum of choice. So often, it is a matter of attending to what Hermann Hesse called, as the world was about to come unworlded by its first global war, “the little joys”; so often, those are the slender threads of which we weave the lifeline that saves us.

      See Maurice Sendak's suggestion that we "sit quietly by a little stream and listen".

  3. Dec 2020
    1. there is no internet connection (Wi-Fi) in the hospital where clinical learning takes place, which was a major factor that participants reported as discouraging them from implementing learning technologie

      Why do you assume that the online component needs to be implemented while on the clinical site? What prevents students and facilitators going online after leaving the clinical site?

    2. However, the opposite was actually experienced in this study. Students reflected a lack of interest in and ability to participate in blended learning activities which seemed quite frustrating to most participan

      Because there is nothing "good" about blended learning in itself. All teaching and learning activities, if implemented poorly, have poor outcomes. Students disengage when the activity has no value (or perceived value) regardless of the medium in which the activity takes place. It has little to do with technology.

    3. purpose of online learning and digital technologies is to complement face-to-face teaching

      This is not accurate. It may be true depending on the context, but it's not inherently true.

    4. The literature has reported that blended learning approaches lead to some measure of improvement in clinical skills such as history taking and clinical reasoning

      But only if online tools are blended or integrated with what is happening in the clinical or practical context. It's not about trying to replace F2F activities with online activities.

    5. his is here, and these are the ways that you will benefit from it.

      Make sure that the discussion integrates some of the theory that was discussed in the literature review.

      The researcher does include some of these concepts in the discussion chapter.

    6. flipped classroom approach

      Is the researcher suggesting that a flipped classroom approach is a subset, or type, of blended learning? Bear in mind that there is nothing that mandates that a flipped classroom approach includes a digital component i.e you can have a flipped classroom without being online. And blended learning does suggest that there is an online component, so it's hard to see how flipped learning is related to blended learning. Maybe this needs to be explored further.

      The researcher does address this juxtaposition later in the thesis.

    7. also that they can download the app

      It has to be about more than apps.

    8. The importance of faculty development in the process of implementing learning technologies was highlighted in this section

      What problem were they trying to solve? It sounds like these participants are being asked (or perceive that they are being asked) to introduce technology for the wrong reasons, which is clearly influencing their attitude towards it.

    9. participate influence participants’ implementatio

      Missing, or extra, words in this sentence?

    10. sometimes a little bit embarrassing to admit that I can’t do it

      There's a level of vulnerability being exposed in some of these quotes, that I hope the researcher picks up on in the discussion.

    11. hat’s all that I tried, and I got such a fright that I stopped... So again, for fear of wasting time and embarrassment, rather leave it.

      It doesn't seem like anyone has suggested to these participants that they should only be using technology to try and solve problems that they are experiencing and only when the technology presents a simpler solution than alternatives.

    12. Bandura (1997)

      This is discussion and interpretation of findings, which should be in the next chapter.

    13. perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) (Davis

      We tend not to include citations in the Results chapter. This should be moved to the Discussion chapter.

    14. and teaching is a smaller part of it

      So are they really clinician-teachers, or are they clinicians who teach when they can?

      The researcher is not really engaging with the participant responses, seeming to accept them as is.

    15. ecause it’s always like the tenth thing that you have to squeeze in for the day

      It's always an add-on, which obviously means that it will always be prioritised accordingly.

    16. I'm a doctor, not a teacher

      Weird that you can't be both. Imagine saying that you're a parent but that you can't teach your children.

    17. and then they can come back

      It's about this regular, iterative engagement with trying to achieve one objective with an integrated approach.

    18. opinion that blended learning could be useful by including the online component of blended learning to prepare students but keep the best features of face-to-face to teach students clinical skills

      The one voice of reason.

    19. that not all technologies are able to facilitate

      And nor are they meant to. Why are these participants so confused about what blended learning is? What's the value in reporting findings that are supposed to illuminate, when these participants are so confused? The only way to resolve this is to use the responses to show how confused they are.

    20. is not suitable for a practical subject where skills and knowledge need to be demonstrated and applied

      Obviously. And no-one is suggesting that it should be done. These people are finding problems where they don't exist, simply because they misunderstand what we're talking about.

    21. There was a feeling that some learning can only be facilitated in a face-to-face setting with the student in the clinical are

      I wonder if this is because there's a misunderstanding about what blended learning is and when it might be used. This isn't about trying to force technology into a place where it doesn't work well. I'm a bit at a loss as to why this is so prevalent in the thesis. Even the researcher seems not to have grasped that these quotes from participants demonstrate a very limited understanding of what blended learning is, which makes the findings very difficult to support.

    22. because they can engage with me after the interaction and ask questions, because often after a delivery of an interaction workshop, tutorial, lecture, I have that group that comes and stands next to me and I know, okay. That’s the time that I appreciate most, because now immediately I know whether I have pitched what I said at the right level, based on the questions that I'm confronted with

      There's nothing stopping you from still doing this. Integrating technology isn't a replacement for the things that you can do well in F2F.

    23. You see, now I have to type that feedback, whereas I would prefer to have spoken that feedback to them

      It's not about what you prefer; it's about what works best for student learning.

    24. which technology cannot necessarily provide

      Exactly, which is why you don't try to have the technology replicate what's possible in F2F sessions. You use the technology to improve what F2F can't do well e.g. collaborate asynchronously, or get input from international colleagues.

    25. I only have one week, so I have to get it right [master the tool] in that one week

      No, you could prepare beforehand. And next year you wouldn't have to do the same amount of preparation because you'd already have done it.

    26. et the student to watch a video beforehand, read an article online before, and then you go to class and then you can just facilitate, they contribute a lot more

      So basically, you're saying that blended learning is a flipped classroom approach. If that's the case, then why do we have a different term for it?

    27. That’s also a form of blended learning,

      Who says?

    28. UNLearn courses is like a garden. It needs constant attendance. So it’s a large amount of work to do it, and once it’s done, it doesn't require that much work to tweak it and fiddle with it, but it needs constant work.

      OK but so should your F2F course. You should also constantly be maintaining and refining those resources. I think that this is another opportunity for the researcher to highlight how many academics just don't see all of the time and effort that F2F requires, simply because it's what they do. They "see" the additional work of online but they ignore all the work that's supposed to be going into F2F as well.

    29. teachers

      I worry that there may be a fundamental misunderstanding of what blended learning is, both on behalf of participants and the researcher.

    30. happy about taking my phone and reading it there and then ... when the question is there, you stop there and then and you Google it.

      Again, how is this qualitatively different to using a textbook to look up an answer to a question?

    31. ecause we find that they don't engage with it until the last minute. So the consistency of the availability of content on SUNLearn far supersedes what I can do in a class

      How is this qualitatively different to having a textbook in your bag? If blended learning is simply about access to more resources, then it's not really any different to calling it "internet access". IMO, these quotes only serve to highlight a very limited and constrained view of what blended learning is.

    32. students have more than one opportunity of getting to it

      This also is not really linked to blended learning. Blended learning is the integration of online and F2F strategies, so that the strengths of each make up for the weaknesses of the other. It's not simply making resources available for later review.

    33. optimised contact time,

      I don't think that this is an outcome of a blended learning approach.

    34. I have a contact session on a certain subject, I will provide them with resources, and an activity to do, maybe a quiz or a discussion, or some form of task that they have to complete, just to make sure that they have prepared well for the face-to-face contact, that I don't spend the first 20 minutes of a 40 minute session just rehashing old information

      How is this different to what is known as the flipped classroom? Same with the next quote...these seem to more accurately describe another approach to learning.

    35. think it means using various technologies to assist learning

      This isn't very different to the quote mentioned above.

    36. suppose it’s including more than one sort of approach to the whole aspect of learning, more than just the old traditional standing in front of the classroom method, but actually more a combination of approaches. So, different approaches, different technologies basically

      This doesn't really seem closely aligned with blended learning. Where is the understanding of integration that is a central component of the approach?

    37. CONCLUSION

      This conclusion also feels "light".

    38. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

      This chapter, which is far more important and consequential than the literature review, is significantly shorter and less detailed. I think that the literature review could be shorted, while the detail of this chapter could be extended.

    39. articulating my personal view

      But you need to do something with this journal. Simply keeping a journal doesn't automatically set aside your beliefs and prevent them from influencing your thinking.

    40. remain unbiase

      We are all biased. We cannot be unbiased. Reflexivity is about recognising that bias and how it influences our actions.

    41. To ensure reflexivity and limit subjectivity (Lewis, 2000), I had to set aside my own perceptions and opinions about blended learning to ensure that they did not influence the findings of the study.

      How exactly do you "set aside" your opinions and beliefs, especially considering that they often operate at subconscious levels?

    42. Audio recordings were then deleted and transcriptions were saved on my password-protected computer

      You should really keep these recordings until such time as your institutional review board recommends that study data can be destroyed. The reason is that these recordings, and not the transcriptions, are the primary data source. Anyone questioning your results would need the audio recordings, as well as the transcripts.

    43. that

      who

    44. that

      who

    45. Some teachers implement blended learning approaches in the form of video tutorials and e-tivities

      This doesn't sound like a blended learning approach. The simple addition of a digital technology is just that; an addition. Blended learning requires that the different approaches are integrated so that the digital and F2F components support each other in the achievement of an objective.

    46. A qualitative research design is based on the interpretative paradigm (Nieuwenhuis, 2016) and was selected in this study in an attempt to understand and capture participants’ lived experiences through the investigation of their behaviour. This research design enabled me to report on how individuals understand and interpret the world and how they construct meaning from their personal experience

      Starting to repeat ideas here. I don't think that the candidate needs to spend so much time explaining the paradigm.

    47. owever, interpretivism has not only strengths, but also limitations. Mack (2010) refers to ontological views as subjective rather than objective, which I soon realised because of my own interest in and belief about blended learning

      Touching on reflexivity.

    48. intentionally

      How would you do this unintentionally? I wonder if this is the correct word to use here?

    49. CONCLUSION

      Considering the length of the chapter, this conclusion feels a bit light. It also only offers a list of the major concepts rather than a summary. It might be worth offering a brief overview of how the main concepts relate to each other so that the reader is reminded of how it all fits together.

    50. Confidence implies competence

      Not at all. These two things might be associated but they are by no means necessarily associated. In fact, there is good evidence that the least competent can sometimes be the most confident. See the Dunning-Kruger effect.

    51. Therefore, it could be argued that belief regarding the usefulness of technologies could lead to change and ultimately the actual use of digital technologies in teaching and learning.

      This goes both ways. A teacher who believes that their job is to control access to specialised information, and to control assessment may use technology to close down learning opportunities (e.g. by banning the use of Wikipedia, YouTube, etc.) and even insisting on the installation of surveillance (proctoring) software on students' personal computers.

      Again, you can argue that technology in itself doesn't make the difference.

    52. Some teachers might believe that their traditional way of transmitting knowledge to students is still the best (Owens, 2012). These pedagogical beliefs can determine whether teachers will implement technologies or not (Judson, 2006; Owens, 2012).

      This seems to continue the assumption that "using technology" = good and "not using technology" = bad. But I really want to see the candidate articulate the understanding that good teaching with technology can be great, but that bad teaching with technology can be awful. Technology can amplify what is there but it doesn't inherently improve something that is bad.

      It would also be interesting, based on the candidate's writing, to hear some reflexivity on their own beliefs, and how these beliefs about the inherent goodness of technology has influenced the direction of the thesis.

    53. It is probably fair to say that the amount of time spent preparing the online component of blended learning is influenced considerably by the experience, knowledge and skills of the teacher.

      Sure. But it's also fair to say that this is true of teachers' preparation of offline learning materials.

    54. lthough some studies might argue that creating blended learning materials could take longer to prepare than traditional teaching, other studies argue that preparing for online teaching takes less time than typical face-to-face teaching preparation

      But people often tend to discount the work (and frameworks that guide this work) that's already gone into the preparation of F2F materials.

    55. It is clear from Bandura’s theory that individuals have the capacity to make their own choices and that several factors influence these choices

      Is there a conflict here with the notion of free will (i.e. that we don't have any)? See Dennet, Harris, Coyne for alternative positions to the notion that we have any agency i.e. that in any situation we could have done something other.

    56. control stress impair their leve

      Is there a missing word from this sentence?

    57. Self-efficacy is defined by Bandura as people’s “judgment of their capabilities to organise and execute courses of action required to attain designated types of performances. It is concerned not with the skills one has but with judgments of what one can do with whatever skills one possesses” (Bandura, 1986:391). In other words, self-efficacy refers to the belief in one’s own ability to perform a task or behaviour (Bandura, 1997), influencing how we think, what we believe and how we conduct ourselves.
    58. n order to determine behavioural intention in a new innovation, Venkatesh and Davis (2000) refer to two key belief constructs to examine: perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU), which are the predictors of users’ attitudes towards using digital technologies. Consequently, attitude depicts the intention to use digital technologies, which affects actual use.

      What we believe influences how we behave.

      "...when a tool is both useful and easy to use, actual system use is more likely"

    59. TAM is based on Fishbein and Ajzen’s theory of reasoned action (TRA), which offers a theoretical perspective that explains human conduct and the significance of one’s beliefs in order to anticipate behaviour (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1975).
    60. This section will focus on the technology acceptance model (TAM) (Davis et al., 1989) and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985). The commonality in these theories (TAM, TPB and SCT) will then be discussed. These three perspectives provide a theoretical foundation for understanding the individual’s reactions in the integration of digital technologies in teaching and learning. While TAM and TPB focus exclusively on teachers’ beliefs about digital technologies, SCT focuses on the teachers’ behaviour.
    61. Social cognitive theory

      Make sure that there's some evidence of this showing up in the discussion.

    62. Bandura (1986:18) suggests that these three factors, namely the person, the behaviour and the environment are “all inseparably entwined to create learning in an individual”
    63. rovides a better understanding of human behaviour

      Better than what? "better" suggests a comparison...something can only be better than something else. What is the something else here?

    64. heories such as the theory of reasoned action (TRA) (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975) were drawn on, which initiated one of the most well-known theories in technology adoption, namely the technology acceptance model (TAM) (Davis, Bagozzi & Warshaw, 1989), which will be discussed later in this chapter. In the early 1990s, researchers started using social cognitive theory (SCT) (Bandura, 1986) when they realised the importance and relevance of self-efficacy in the adoption of digital technologies
    65. Technology readiness and digital literacy contribute to students’ experience of technology strategies in teaching and learnin

      Why is OK to make this distinction within the group (i.e. millenials, for example) but to also make the claim that the same group (millenials) are self-directed learners?

    66. influences their need to self-direct their learning and discover information

      Categorising entire cohorts of students based on their date of birth.

      There is evidence that the simplistic categorisation of entire cohorts of students based on their date of birth is problematic. It also often fails to distinguish between those who feel comfortable using relatively simple tools in the context of social media (sharing, liking, etc.) and the more complex and nuanced use of digital tools to engage in professional learning, especially when that learning includes collaboration.

    67. The literature review is comprehensive and covers a broad overview of all of the most important concepts that are relevant to the thesis. The candidate has demonstrated an adequate understanding of these concepts, as well as their relationship to each other.

    68. a leader teaching scholar

      "leading" teaching scholar?

    69. knowledge deliver

      Be careful of this phrasing.

    1. We don’t know what the technology of human level intelligence is going to look like, so we can’t estimate how hard it is going to be to achieve.

      "Estimate" in this context is no different to "guess".

    2. No matter how much we improve on our basic architecture of our current AI over the next 100 years, we are just not going to get there. We’re going to need to invent something else. Rockets. To be sure, the technologies used in airplanes and rockets are not completely disjoint. But rockets are not just over developed heavier than air flying machines. They use a different set of principles, equations, and methodologies.

      I like the analogy.

    3. No modern airplane engine works at all like those of 1903 or even 1920. Deep Learning, too, will be replaced over time. It will seem quaint, and barely viable in retrospect. And woefully energy inefficient.

      Anyone who thinks that ML represents some kind of endpoint might be delusional.

    4. First, there is tremendous potential for our current version of AI. It will have enormous economic, cultural, and geopolitical impact. It will change life for ordinary people over the next many decades. It will create great riches for some. It will lead to different world views for many. Like heavier than air flight it will transform our world in ways in which we can not yet guess.

      Many people think that Brooks is opposed to AI because he takes a critical view of deep learning, and has more pessimistic (realistic?) timelines for when we may achieve general AI. But being critical isn't the same as being in opposition to.

    1. The word florilegium literally means a gathering of flowers — flos (flowers) and legere (to gather).

      Is this the origin of what people have recently started calling digital gardens?

    2. keep, share, and remix ideas

      See Stephen Downes' aggregate, remix, repurpoise, feed forward.

    1. thinking about moving from a static medium like marks on paper to a dynamic medium with computational responsiveness infused into it, that can actually participate in the thinking process

      Like Tony Starks VR prototyping environment?

    1. This is pretty much the process that I'm looking to replicate with my own learning system. Aggregate, remix, repurpose, feed forward.

    2. doctor

      Docker

    3. fields

      "feeds"?

    4. isn't

      I think this should be "is".

    5. I also feed forward the result of my learning in different ways that way I get feedback and criticism and the cycle starts again

      Sharing what we learn so that it can be "peer reviewed" is part of a scholarly practice.

    1. We should all spend more time thinking about the prospect of failure and what we might do about it.

      Hope for the best but plan for the worst.

    1. Browsing the extension store feels more like going to a local flea market than going to a supermarket

      There's something compelling about finding a browser extension that solves a small problem.

    2. website developers and extension authors

      Like, for example, Google having a problem with ad-blockers in Google Chrome. This is an example of why monopolies aren't great; Google makes money selling ads but they also control a browser that most people use. There's a conflict here when the users of the browser install extensions that limit Google's ability to show you ads.

    3. I can start assembling my own personalized way of using my computer

      Strictly speaking, you can assemble a personalised way of using your browser.

    4. By installing four different Gmail extensions that modify everything from the visual design to the core functionality, in some sense, I’ve put together my own email client

      I'd love to know what these extensions are.

    5. On smartphone and desktop platforms, this sort of behavior ranges from unusual to impossible, but in the browser it’s an everyday activity

      It's true; unless you're using an open source app and you have the skills to modify the programme at the source-code level, you're pretty much stuck with the framework that the original developer gives you.

      Browser extensions make it possible to modify the appearance and functionality of online apps e.g. Gmail, Twitter, etc.

    1. How can we as a community of scholars facilitate this work? How can a scholar or pedagogue make an article, an assignment, a syllabus, a book, a database, or a website available for others in a manner that makes it easy for another to rework and redeploy? Putting a PDF on a website is not enough, even for materials of moderate complexity. We need tools that make it relatively easy to put the ideology of liberal education into practice, from the simple class assignment to the multimedia textbook. One such tool is GitHub

      This is such a powerful idea; an open source approach to developing materials and curricula.

    1. Where liberally minded scholars and pedagogues are seeking to create and curate human knowledge in a way that is more open, accessible, and valuable to the human community, we have a useful model in the open-source movement.

      I wonder if the article might be built upon by finding software development principles, perhaps those that apply specifically to the open source community, and align them with principles of scholarly practice.

    2. critical pedagogy

      It's a bit late to introduce this new term into the article. Unless the reader is familiar with it (and even then it's not immediately clear how this relates to the topic of this piece), it's expecting a lot of them to make the connection to the topic of open source.

    3. Following the model of open-source software, we can enter our ideas and expressions into public discourse

      This also isn't a well-aligned argument. Articles published in a for-profit journal are entered into the public discourse (although obviously not into the public domain). Unless public means "without cost", which I don't think it does.

      We might want to broaden this to include open-access, which is specific to publication models.

    4. We are unapologetic tinkerers who neither invent the wheel, nor are satisfied with the wheels already at our disposal. The best scholarship and the best pedagogy take the best of what already exists and make it better, at least better for the task at hand. We need to embrace this identity as hackers, acknowledge our indebtedness to those who have gone before us, forsake the illusion that we are creating (can create, should create) something wholly original, but also refuse to take for granted the things that have been passed down to us.

      I think that this might be where I'm missing something. The article is about the relationship between open-source software development and scholarship, but now we're talking about "hacking" as the equivalent of a software developer. And I'm not sure that I agree with this.

      I don't think that software-developers think of themselves as hackers. For me, there's an underlying subversive nature in the hacker category, which need not be present in a software developer. There's a conflation between software developer and hacker, which misses some of the nuance that's necessary.

    5. Academic research and teaching often necessitate manipulation, re-creation, breaking, rebuilding, etc. This “manipulation, re-creation, breaking, rebuilding” — in other words, hacking

      It's not self-evident to me that these activities are the same as those associated with hacking (and I'm not talking about the malevolent/negative connotations of hacking).

      I also think of a hacker as a tinkerer, which can include "manipulation, re-creation, breaking, building, etc." but need not. It feels like there's something fundamental missing here but I can't put my finger on it.

      I don't really have a conclusion here, other than to suggest that the hacker/scholar relationship might need a lot more development than I see here.

    1. The open stream means the reading, note-taking, reflecting, developing ideas, and publishing process is a continuous repeating cycle. Not a linear pipeline.Instead of reading a whole book. Then importing the notes. Then highlighting and reflecting on them. Then crafting a summary. Then uploading the "finished work" to the internet, I instead do all of those at once. In very small chunks.

      This is something that I struggle with; the huge task of editing and creating notes from the excerpts and notes I've exported from a book I've finished.

      But the idea of having 3 sets of notes to manage the "flow" (3 locations for notes doesn't seem very "flow-y") isn't very appealing. I'm looking for a refinement that reduces the number of steps it takes to get something done.

      However, I'm intrigued with this idea of ideas "flowing" from the book into my system, rather than having them all kept behind a dam wall and then releasing it all at once.

    1. A blogpost from a year ago and one from last month turned out to be dealing with the same notions, and I remember them both, but hadn’t yet perceived them as a sequence or as the later post being a possible answer to the earlier post.

      I've sometimes noticed this kind of connection in my own thinking, when revisiting an old post and realising that it's connected (sometimes very powerfully) with what's going on with me currently. I had just forgotten that I used to think about these ideas.

    2. Only doing responsive writing based on daily RSS feed input feels too empty in comparison

      This is why I stopped doing something similar i.e. writing short-form comments on posts that appeared in my RSS reader. I suppose it may have served a purpose in that I could have been surfacing potentially interesting information for others, along with a short comment on why I thought it was interesting. But it didn't leave me with much of a feeling of satisfaction.

    3. This in order to build a better thinking aid, by having an easy accessible collection of my own ideas and concepts, and interesting viewpoints and perspectives of others (and references). It isn’t about collecting factual info.

      I hear this completely, as it's something that I've been thinking about as well. However, I went the other way, and decided that including factual information in my system seems reasonable. I thought that I'd end up spending too much time trying to decide what notes should go into which system. Where is boundary between a "fact" I came up with that's true in my context, and a fact that I read in a book? I was worried that this distinction would end up creating an arbitrary boundary between my own thoughts and the thoughts of others, when the only thing I really care about is whether the output of the system (i.e. my thinking) would be enhanced.

    1. There are other functions I won’t use because they do not fit my system. For instance it is possible to publish your Obsidian vault publicly online (at publish.obsidian.md, here’s a random example), and some do. To me that is unthinkable: my notes are an extension of my thinking and a personal tool. They are part of my inner space. Publishing is a very different thing, meant for a different audience (you, not me), more product than internal process. At most I can imagine having separate public versions of internal notes, but really anything I publish in a public digital garden is an output of my internal digital garden. Obviously I’d want to publish those through my own site, not through an Obsidian controlled domain.

      This is very useful, thanks. I've been struggling with this myself over the past few weeks, looking at different options for how I might create a public version of my personal notes.

      I've been influenced by the idea of learning in public, which is still intriguing to me. But I like this idea that what I publish is an output of what I've been thinking and learning about. More of a product than something where the process is the output.

    1. This allows me to for instance in a client conversation have my task list for that project, notes from our previous conversation as well as in-depth notes about the work, all in one overview, next to the file in which I’m taking notes from the ongoing meeting itself. While in parallel to all that I still have the ability to pull all kinds of other information or conceptual description during the meeting. This allows me to quickly bring up things in high detail, and easily switch between high-level and low-level things, organisational aspects and the topic at hand etc.

      This is how I use Obsidian as well, but I have a separate vault for this kind of "operational" note-taking, as opposed to "knowledge-building" note-taking.

      I know that there's less of a hard boundary between these different contexts than the use of separate vaults suggests, but I've found that I rarely need to switch between them.

    1. Scientific articles and other documents I keep in Zotero, and from my notes I reference the Zotero entry.

      I use Zotero for all resources. It also forms the basis for my literature notes (excerpts and responses to the author) that will stay in Zotero but which will inform my permanent notes.

      For example, all of these comments and highlights (created in Hypothes.is) will be saved in Zotero, along with this blog post. As I've been working through this post I've also been adding, editing, and deleting some of my permanent notes in response. I'll work through these comments again in Zotero, and do a deeper dive into my permanent notes.

    2. I notice a rising need with myself for higher quality material as input.

      Exactly. I've come to realise the same thing. My reasoning was that I'm becoming overwhelmed with the low-quality (some might even call it noise) sources that I have to spend time on before realising that it's not high-value.

    3. Next to actual output, I pull together Notions, and sometimes Notes in what I call ’emergent outlines’ (Söhnke Ahrens in his book about Zettelkasten calls them speculative outlines, I like emergence better than speculation as a term).

      Yes, emergent suits me better as well.

    4. progressive summarising

      Or, what might also be called elaboration.

    5. I spin out notes and potential Notions from my project notes, as I encounter things in my work where some idea or thought jumps out. Those potential Notions I put in a folder called proto notions, inside my GotFP

      I just include these initial thoughts / ideas in the same Obsidian vault as my permanent notes. I think of them as "permanent notes in training" or, as some people have started calling them, seedlings (in the language of the digital gardening crowd).

    6. If you look at the same graph with distance 2, the layer of additionally visible nodes show how my new Notion might be connected to things like online identity, using the environment to store memory and layered access to information. This triggers additional thoughts during the writing process.

      Lovely. This is such a great insight that I can already see is going to help me a lot.

    7. Usually while writing a Notion, I show the graph of how it connects to other Notions/Notes alongside it. I set the graph to show not only the 1st level links, as that only shows the links already apparent from the text I have in front of me. I set it to show 3 steps out at the start, and reduce to two steps when there are more links.

      This is a great idea that hasn't occurred to me before. When looking for non-obvious relationships between concepts (something that I think forms part of creativity), it makes sense to have the graph view open alongside the note you're working on.

    8. The ideas-greenhouse holds ideas I have, ideas that seem like something that can be put to action more or less quickly. They may be connected to notes in the other two folders, or to notes in the project folders. An example would be, that I jotted down the idea of making a digital garden for my company two months ago, triggered by a posting on how a community should have its governance documented in combination with having reread the communication handbook of Basecamp while thinking about remote working. It has since morphed into building a collective memory, and turned into a budding internal website documenting the first few things.

      This pretty much describes something similar for me:

      • Capture an initial snippet of an idea, based on something I've read or heard somewhere.
      • I might turn it over in my head a few times, re-read it, find a few links, do a bit more reading.
      • Eventually I expand on it with my own thoughts, maybe breaking it up into separate (permanent) notes, with links to the original source.
    9. Notions, Notes, Ideas and work notes

      My equivalent, as best as I can tell, is:

      • Permanent notes (atomic, linked concepts) = Notions
      • Temporary notes (half-formed thoughts, links, snippets, etc.) = Notes
      • Temporary notes initially, which later become permanent notes = Ideas (see later comment about why)
      • Admin notes (projects, tasks, meetings, etc.) = Work notes
    10. resources written down with the context added of how I found them and why I was interested

      I might also use Zotero to capture the original resource, with a few notes alongside it to explain why I kept it.

    11. As they are more conceptual than factual I started calling them Notions to distinguish them from the other more general resource Notes

      I've started keeping these things (fact-type notes and conceptual-type notes) together, since I sometimes find it difficult to find the boundaries of when one becomes the other. For me, it makes sense to keep this all in the same place (in my case, a single vault in Obsidian).

    12. They can be linked to Ideas, Notes or Notions, or may give rise to them, but they serve a purpose firmly rooted in ongoing work. They are always placed within the context, and folder, of a specific project

      Similar to how I've come to think of my "admin" or "operational" notes. They're instrumental in that they serve a purpose that is usually about moving some project forward.

    13. The system works for me because it combines those two things and has them interact: My internal dialogue is all about connected ideas and factoids, whereas doing activities and completing projects is more hierarchical in structure.

      Part of me is interested to merge these two aspects; I tend to think of them as "knowledge" and "operations". Knowledge-type work is more networked and connected in nature, while operations-type activities are more structured. However, I don't use a note/folder hierarchy here either.