5 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2021
  2. www.journals.uchicago.edu www.journals.uchicago.edu
    Is Peer Review a Good Idea? | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
    1
    1. jasminehollingworth 26 Jul 2021

      Heesen, R., & Bright, L. K. (2020). Is Peer Review a Good Idea? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 000–000. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz029

      lang:en is:article peer review peer review idea prepublication abolish abolish social structure science incentive behavior consquence confidence
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/bjps/axz029
  3. Aug 2020
  4. osf.io osf.io
    Mapping the discursive dimensions of the reproducibility crisis: A mixed methods analysis
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 25 Aug 2020

      Nelson, N. C., Ichikawa, K., Chung, J., & Malik, M. (2020). Mapping the discursive dimensions of the reproducibility crisis: A mixed methods analysis [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/sbv3q

      is:preprint lang:en metascience reproducibility replication crisis mixed methods analysis scientific practice empirical analysis discursive dimension incentive structure transparency publishing discussion
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/sbv3q/
  5. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    When Values Collide: Why Scientists Argue About Open Science and How to Move Forward
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 25 Aug 2020

      Fife, D., Lung, M., Sullivan, N., & Young, C. (2020). When Values Collide: Why Scientists Argue About Open Science and How to Move Forward [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q9d28

      is:preprint lang:en metascience value open science scientific practice objectivity flaw bias uncertainty transparency system development communication incentive structure reputability validity
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/q9d28/
  6. Jun 2020
  7. www.metaphant.net www.metaphant.net
    PYMS
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 22 Jun 2020

      Meta-Scientists (PYMS), P. for Y. (n.d.). PYMS. PYMS. Retrieved June 22, 2020, from /

      is:webpage lang:en metascience open research pre-registration bad science scientific practice reporting incentive structure early career
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    metaphant.net/
  8. Apr 2020
  9. royalsocietypublishing.org royalsocietypublishing.org
    Competition for novelty reduces information sampling in a research game - a registered report | Royal Society Open Science
    1
    1. Marlene_Wulf 23 Apr 2020

      Tiokhin, L., & Derex, M. (n.d.). Competition for novelty reduces information sampling in a research game—A registered report. Royal Society Open Science, 6(5), 180934. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180934

      is:article lang:en competition information research incentive structure accuracy
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.180934