511 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2019
    1. Improving higher education should be a national priority.

      I feel like this idea should be stressed, especially with the high tuition fees in today's world

    2. ity University of New York system propelled almost six times as many low-income students into the middle class and beyond as all eight Ivy League campuses, plus Duke, M.I.T., Stanford and Chicago, combined.

      Private university aren't helping low income students as compared to a public university who is helping students change economic classes.

    3. These students entered college poor. They left on their way to the middle class and often the upper middle class.

      A college degree helps you changed which economic class you fall in.

    4. The heyday of the colleges that serve America’s working class can often feel very long ago. It harks back to the mid-20th century, when City College of New York cost only a few hundred dollars a year and was known as the “Harvard of the proletariat.”

      Colleges are no longer serving the working class, college cost so much. Why? When years ago is cost only a few hundred compared to thousands.

    5. itself

      It wouldnt let me highlight the whole thing.

      Working students need to have access to college and work and still be able to pay for it all, on what they make. That should be a possibility if enough effort put in.

    6. More recently, these universities have seemed to struggle, with unprepared students, squeezed budgets and high dropout rates.

      I can’t say i’m surprised by this because now a days colleges are so expensive many people do not have enough money to attend college or even a junior college. Also people do are able to attend college may realize that it is more expensive than they thought which explains the drop out rate.

    7. proletariat.

      pro·le·tar·i·at Dictionary result for proletariat /ˌprōləˈterēət/Submit noun workers or working-class people, regarded collectively (often used with reference to Marxism). "the growth of the industrial proletariat" synonyms: the workers, working-class people, wage-earners, the laboring classes, the common people, the ordinary people, the lower classes, the masses, the commonalty, the rank and file, the third estate, the plebeians; More the lowest class of citizens in ancient Rome.

    8. hese more typical campuses, students often work while they’re going to college. Some are military veterans, others learned English as a second language and others are in their mid-20s or 30s.

      Students are stretched thin, and needs will typically rule the decision to drop out or stay in school.

    9. Dropout rates are high, saddling students with debt but no degree

      dropping out means debt and no degree

    10. There are a lot of people who would not go to college at all, and would not get an education at all

      College are not for everyone and there are other ways to succeed or get a job without a college degree

    11. making more money than their parents as soon as they start their first post-college job

      Most parents don't make much for a living or even have a stable job..

    12. these universities have seemed to struggle, with unprepared students, squeezed budgets and high dropout rates

      Colleges are different from high school, plus some people cannot afford to attend college which causes high dropout rates

    13. The reason is clear. State funding for higher education has plummeted. It’s down 18 percent per student, adjusted for inflation, since 2008, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The financial crisis pinched state budgets, and facing a pinch, some states decided education wasn’t a WB_wombat_top priority.“It’s really been a nightmare,” said Diana Natalicio, UTEP’s president and herself a first-generation college graduate. “The state does not recognize — and it’s not just in Texas — the importance that the investment in public education has for the economy and so many other things. Education was for me, and for many of the rest of us, the great opportunity creator.”

      What a surprise to think that money is going down for funds to states for college.

    14. Pavia grew up in Canutillo, a poor neighborhood in El Paso, the son of a construction worker and house cleaner. He did well enough in high school to attend many colleges but — as frequently happens with low-income students — was not willing to leave home at age 18 for an unfamiliar world. “I just didn’t feel like I was ready to go out to college on my own,” he said. “So I decided to stay home and save money.”

      Does Texas not offer Financial aids to students?

    15. After all, the earnings gap between four-year college graduates and everyone else has soared in recent decades. The unemployment rate for college graduates today is a mere 2.5 percent.

      This article from 2017 may not be too accurate.

    16. They remain deeply impressive institutions that continue to push many Americans into the middle class and beyond — many more, in fact, than elite colleges that receive far more attention.

      Will I really be able to beat a Stanford student when applying for a job ?

    17. Out West, California built an entire university system that was both accessible and excellent

      Csu or UC ?

    18. “There is a real problem with the elite privates and flagship publics in not serving as many low-income students as they should,”

      I agree with this as the cost of college has not made it easy or possible for those who come from low-income families to succeed in obtaining a college education or degree.

    19. these universities have seemed to struggle, with unprepared students, squeezed budgets and high dropout rates.

      Many universities have high drop out rates which can't necessarily be fixed as each individual has their own reasons on as to why they leave

    20. Education was for me, and for many of the rest of us, the great opportunity creator.

      there should be more investment into public education for it liberates many and gives them purpose to move forward and have their dream(s) become reality

    21. City University of New York system propelled almost six times as many low-income students into the middle class and beyond as all eight Ivy League campuses, plus Duke, M.I.T., Stanford and Chicago, combined.

      elite colleges not taking their responsibility seriously and help the students who attend the school

    22. On several dozen of campuses, remarkably, fewer students hail from the entire bottom half of the income distribution than from the WB_wombat_top 1 percent.

      this shows that those in the bottom are welcomed and are ready to pursue college and succeed

    23. UTEP to teach an intensive two-week class on business and law. Pavia’s story is the classic story of the American dream.

      UTEP helps students of all social standards

    24. “There are a lot of people who would not go to college at all, and would not get an education at all, if they had to go through some selective criteria,

      don't want to be judged or think that they won't be able to succeed

    25. success stories are real, too, and they’re fairly common

      why are they so similar

    26. Dropout rates are high, saddling students with debt but no degree. For-profit colleges perform the worst, and a significant number of public colleges also struggle.

      why do profit colleges perform worst than those of non profit?

    27. Baruch graduates, he added, are making more money than their parents as soon as they start their first post-college job.

      this is interesting, would it have to do with the demand of certain majors along with increase in salary or not

    28. These students entered college poor. They left on their way to the middle class and often the upper middle class.

      both graduates and dropouts were able to climb the economic ladder

    29. many of them are performing much better than their new stereotype suggests.

      they're helping students finish their education even with the obstacles the school(s) themselves are facing

    30. unprepared students, squeezed budgets and high dropout rates.

      did they do nothing to try and better their education as well as helping them?

    31. West, California built an entire university system that was both accessible and excellent.

      affordable and equal higher education opportunities

    32. performing much better than their new stereotype suggests.

      .how so?

    33. More recently, these universities have seemed to struggle, with unprepared students, squeezed budgets and high dropout rates. To some New Yorkers, “City College” is now mostly a byword for nostalgia.

      .high drop out rates .

  2. Jan 2019
    1. healthy relationship with all technology,

      main idea summarized

    2. We do not face a simple choice of digital or analog. That is the false logic of the binary code that computers are programmed with, which ignores the complexity of life in the real world.

      key idea- author knows we cannot live without the technology we already have

    3. but learning happens best when we build upon the relationships between students, teachers and their peers.

      social interaction is extremely important

    4. but has outperformed digital learning experiments

      i agree that some things- such as a teacher in a classroom rather than online cannot be replaced

    5. encouraging human interaction

      not artificial like that of social media

    6. feeling of belonging.

      main idea about analog giving a sense of home

    7. real places where we live.

      can be debated that communities found online are very real to many people

    8. the walled garden of analog saves both time and inspires creativity.

      main idea of the article- for analog devices

    9. powerful efficiency in that simplicity

      minimalism is becoming increasingly popular in all aspects of life

    10. unparalleled with anything delivered through a screen

      this is true- but there are things that the analog devices cannot due that are essential to everyday life

    11. But younger consumers who never owned a turntable and have few memories of life before the internet drive most of the current interest in analog

      this is ironic since the trend was started by social media

    12. Vinyl records have witnessed a decade-long boom in popularity (more than 200,000 newly pressed records are sold each week in the United States)

      interesting that this became a trend among teens

    13. Nearly half of millennials worry about the negative effects of social media on their mental and physical health, according to the American Psychiatric Association.

      can cause major self esteem issues as well as can be a public health issue- lack of exercise

    14. Facebook and Twitter are eroding our democratic institutions

      huge issue in today's news

    15. it was revolutionary at the time it came out

  3. Nov 2018
    1. get the better of the major objection to your argument by raising and answering it in advance

      We've talked about the importance of anticipating objections when writing all three of our previous assignments. WP2-B is no exception. Addressing likely objections helps you rhetorically, as it shows you're paying attention to what others say, not just to what you happen to think.

    2. An op-ed contributor is a specialist who seeks only to inform them

      I would prefer the word "persuade" to "inform." When informing readers, one doesn't necessarily have to make an argument. But op-eds are all about argument. So, aim to do more than inform. Persuade your readers to accept your argument.

  4. Oct 2018
    1. whatever messages people with money want to push at us

      How does this play into equity? Does this provide an unfair advantage for certain groups? Should we be obligated to support or should this be an impetus for people to support underrepresented groups against those with hateful opinions?

    2. This means those using pseudonyms to protect their identities while posting about human rights violations in repressive regimes and are flagged by members of those regimes may face consequences for breaking the rule, while others go unnoticed.

      This is also an issue on YouTube, where many LGBTQ+ videos were flagged as inappropriate. Is this an industry-wide issue that will continue to hold, or are companies simply dismissive of these issues at hand?

    3. It’s a combination that leaves it without effective competition.

      Is this concerning? Does this effectively make it a pseudo-monopoly (I'm not an economist, so I can't say what is actually defined as such) or does it act as a company that simply outcompetes its competition?

    4. Rather, as this latest incident should remind us, we are Facebook’s product.

      Although this article is in the Opinions section, the article also does have a large journalistic aspect in reporting just how Facebook's ad system works. It's somewhat shorter than I expected, but makes its point quickly and recaps it right here.

    1. Out of curiosity, the other day I searched “cellphones” on Google.

      Similarly, this is under NYT's "Sunday Review," indicating that it's not a purely journalistic article and along with the first-person view, contains a very vivid opinion. That being said, the reader can choose to trust or not trust the author.

    2. But, really, how can you tell?

      This sentence is an exemplification of the writing style that caters to a general audience rather than a more niche audience. The author is talking to the public at large, not to other Silicon Valley people--it's a warning siren rather than simply just a critical response.

    3. Growth becomes the overriding motivation — something treasured for its own sake, not for anything it brings to the world.

      This article chooses to break up the text (although not in full) -- with quotes instead of photos. Rather, it relies on the flashing image at the top to carry the reader through.

    4. Silicon Valley Is Not Your Friend

      The sensory overload of the title and the drawing behind it is somewhat overwhelming but ultimately seems to serve a greater purpose of appealing to engrained perceptions of neon colors as alarming and flashing screens as worrisome and triggering.

  5. Sep 2018
    1. and getting polio and having to wait in line at the bank to check your account balance.

      Subtle (and sarcastic) way of transitioning to his main point of his next paragraph

    2. We don’t deny that new technologies come with some perils.

      Argument 3: People wan't to go back to the past days, and that's why they don't want people playing video games too much (because they didn't exist to this popularity at that time)

    3. The risk here, of course, is that by treating the immoderate playing of video games as an addiction, we are pathologizing relatively normal behavior.

      Ethos: Making people who play video games a lot feel like they are not "regular" people.

    4. More damning

      Pathos: Anger

    5. A large-scale study of internet-based games

      Argument 2: Specific studies on this topic support his argument

    6. Let’s start with the neuroscientific analogy:

      Argument 1: "Video games are like drugs", He rebuts this by saying that they don't hit the same areas of the brain as drugs do.

    7. This is all terribly misguided. Playing video games is not addictive in any meaningful sense. It is normal behavior that, while perhaps in many cases a waste of time, is not damaging or disruptive of lives in the way drug or alcohol use can be.

      Thesis and clear side of the argument: "This is all terribly misguided"

    8. Evidence for addiction to video games is virtually nonexistent.

      Clincher

    9. American Journal of Psychiatry

      Logos

    10. By contrast, using a drug like methamphetamine can cause a level of dopamine release 10 times that or more.

      Logos

    11. Playing a video game or watching an amusing video on the internet causes roughly about as much dopamine to be released in your brain as eating a slice of pizza.

      Logos

    12. This is true but not illuminating.

      Recognition of opposition

    13. World Health Organization

      Logos

    14. the neuroscientist Andrew Doan

      Logos

    15. The American Psychiatric Association

      Logos

    16. It’s certainly common to hear parents complain that their children are “addicted” to video games. Some researchers even claim that these games are comparable to illegal drugs in terms of their influence on the brain — that they are “digital heroin”

      Statement of topic and issue

    17. the neuroscientist Peter C. Whybrow

      Logos

    18. Is video game addiction a real thing?

      Hook

    1. But a student who designs and sells greeting cards and mentions on her Facebook page that she is a softball player risks losing her athletic eligibility. That is shameful. Bylaw 12.5.1.3 has got to go.

      They need to fix this law, it is unfair and unjust.

    2. It means that the author’s book biography cannot state that he participates in a college-level sport. It means that, in publicizing the book to students or alumni, the college cannot mention that the author is a student athlete.

      Thats unfair to the student athlete.

    3. But N.C.A.A. bylaw 12.5.1.3, otherwise denoted as “Modeling and Other Nonathletically Related Promotional Activities,” specifies that, in promoting the book, no reference can be made to the individual’s “involvement in intercollegiate athletics.”

      The point before now makes sense.

    4. Our school is fortunate to have as a student a young man (whose name I can’t mention) who has published a book (whose title I can’t cite). The book has nothing whatsoever to do with athletics, but among his many activities at the college, he participates in an intercollegiate sport (which, of course, shall remain unspecified).

      How come yet came mention his name?

    5. let’s begin by reforming the association’s bylaw that prevents college athletes from promoting any personal creative endeavor if they even mention that they participate in a sport.

      Why haven't they done it yet?

    6. Its root cause is that universities with powerhouse sports teams like U.C.L.A., Ohio State and Texas receive nearly $20 million a year from brands like Adidas or Nike, while the athletes wearing the Adidas or Nike apparel are expected to compete purely for the love of the game.

      Why don't athletes get a athletes.

    7. It’s about the lengths to which the N.C.A.A. goes to control every dollar and branding opportunity associated with college athletics.

      Why is that?

    1. nt us to get back our desire for broad consensus and to reject strategies that seek to impose one group’s ideas over another’s. I want collaboration and strategic agreements on nationwide issues.

      inspiring people to think the same way he does

    2. I want to see a return to efficiency — and to sanity. I want our proud, pragmatic Catalan spirit back.

      end goal

    3. new elections for the Catalan Parliament.

      new politicians are needed

    4. the matter of independence has divided Catalans, distanced us from the European Union and frightened away banks and businesses. A resolution is necessary.

      why it is a problem

    5. independence movement in Catalonia is still acting irresponsibly by threatening a unilateral declaration of independence

      threatening pulling away all together

    6. federal financing system should function as an alliance between the Catalonia tax office and the federal tax administration.

      the governments should work together

    7. Second, the Catalan government should have exclusive jurisdiction over issues like language, education and culture. The Spanish state should guarantee that it will defend and encourage the use of all of Spain’s languages.

      Works kind of like the federal and state government: the Spanish state works on big picture and Catalan government takes care of "smaller" deals

    8. Catalonia is a nation that exists within Spain must be recognized

      Catalonia is a nation inside nation but decides its own sovereignty. The author believes that the constitution should recognize that.

    9. This new agreement, which should culminate in federal constitutional reform, must address several objectives.

      talking about a theoretical reform

    10. the support of a much broader majority

      the goal is to have the vast majority's wishes come true

    11. The Socialist Party of Catalonia, which I lead, has a plan to move forward. We refuse to choose between paralysis and secessionism. We do not want to see a minority — or even a slim majority — of Catalans impose their views on the rest of the population on this issue

      the author is biased to the socialist party of catalonia because they lead the movement

    12. the matter of independence has divided Catalans

      this issue is dividing Catalonia

    13. A minority cannot be allowed to impose its opinion upon the rest of Catalonia.

      not enough people voted on the issue for the vote to reflect the full opinion of Catalonia

    14. Some of it belongs to the pro-independence faction in Catalonia’s regional parliament, which chose to disregard the law and schedule an independence referendum for Oct. 1. But the central government in Madrid deserves much of the blame for the crisis, too. Incapable of negotiating with Catalans, it delegated the matter to the judicial branch, which issued an order forbidding the referendum, an order that ultimately led to the police’s use of excessive force against voters.

      At a standstill because neither party is doing the "right thing"

    15. The relationship between Catalonia and the rest of Spain has become a serious institutional crisis

      The main focus of the article

    16. it must be resolved as soon as possible

      call to action

  6. Feb 2018
    1. The number of Portuguese dying from overdoses plunged more than 85 percent before rising a bit in the aftermath of the European economic crisis of recent years. Even so, Portugal’s drug mortality rate is the lowest in Western Europe — one-tenth the rate of Britain or Denmark — and about one-fiftieth the latest number for the U.S.
    2. 25,000 Portuguese use heroin, down from 100,000 when the policy began.

      Since it was decriminalized the number of users dropped drastically

    3. After more than 15 years, it’s clear which approach worked better. The United States drug policy failed spectacularly, with about as many Americans dying last year of overdoses — around 64,000 — as were killed in the Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq Wars combined. Photo

      Why wont we make a change towards portugals way of tackling drugs. We had more people die from drugs then from any person in the vietnam, afghanistan, abd iraq wars COMBINED!!!!!

    4. drug addiction has been treated more as a medical challenge than as a criminal justice issue.

      it is a much better approach to tackle the problem then to incarcerate people in prison for these petty drug crimes.

    5. gently encourages them to try to quit and gives them clean hypodermics to prevent the spread of AIDS.

      it is a change to try and get them to stop without really pushing it on them

    1. “These are animals,” President Trump said of MS-13 members. Most often, rather, they are like my student: young people, not unlike child soldiers, who enter a violent life

      Calling these gang members "animals" is not at all accurate because these people often don't have a choice and gangs is their only escape out of their struggles.

    2. . Being in school felt impossible to him because he felt unable to succeed at it. He had an upcoming court case and no lawyer; that, he knew, would cost money he didn’t have.

      Poor kids that cannot succeed in school often lead horrible lives and are even at risk of becoming homeless.

    3. thousands of dollars of high-interest debt and little or no English skills. And they face an administration that insists that they are gangsters bringing bloodshed and gang warfare to American cities.

      How do the immigrants arrive to the United States if they are clearly in debt?

    4. 13. For two years he lived alone in her house, selling water bottles on the street on behalf of a neighboring family. Sometimes they invited him over for dinner; other times they didn’t.

      How are these kids able to survive if they are by themselves and can not afford food?

  7. Jan 2018
    1. What these findings show is that pride, gratitude and compassion, whether we consciously realize it or not, reduce the human mind’s tendency to discount the value of the future.

      pride, gratitude, compassion are emotions that leads us to value the future more, rather than using the instruments of logic and willpower. it's an interesting claim. but it's necessarily the case that one has to eliminate the other. you can still use logic and willpower to make those decisions about the future, about the marshmellow, but the reason why is rooted in other people. and it's this social connection that is a really good motivator for people. having an emotional connection to something is more likely to illicit a powerful reaction than just pure logic and willpower. so maybe it's when thinking about the future logic < emotional. well it's two different things. in terms of deciding to discount the future. i would say that logic does allow us to value the future more. but to follow through? i guess pride and compassion helps to increase perseverance as well.

  8. Dec 2017
    1. “Faith requires the possibility of rejection, or it is not faith.”

      Actually, science requires the possibility of rejection, or it is not science.

    1. but a federal judge ruled this summer that the state is not required to inform people with convictions who couldn’t vote under the old law that they may now register to vote.

      wtf???

    2. The law bars people with felonies of “moral turpitude” from voting. For decades such crimes were ill defined, but once included things like miscegenation

      wow

    1. I can only imagine how it has reopened the wounds of the women who came forward with their stories about him, and did not receive enough attention. This country is currently trying to reconcile itself to years of power abuse and sexual misconduct. Its leader is wantonly poking the bear.

      Poking the bear?

  9. Nov 2017
    1. No doubt most of you do some or all of these things

      Most, but not all. Some 30 million Americans are without high-speed home internet access, a problem Chairman Pai has made worse by recent efforts to dismantle the FCC's Lifeline program, which offers affordable broadband access options to low-income households.

    2. Ajit Pai

      Ajit Pai is Federal Communications Commission Chairman, appointed by President Donald Trump in early 2017. He previously served as a commissioner to the federal agency, and before that as general counsel to Verizon.

    1. The courage this country has shown

      Can anyone explain me how exactly has Spain being oppressing Catalonia all these years? I just don't get it.

    2. has caused an outcry and our response to it has become a priority.

      Their response so far has been to do nothing, oh, and fly to Brussels to "tell the world" and "ask Europe to react"; which it did, saying it's Spanish internal affair, a country they consider a democracy.

    3. It is essential to weave solid alliances with all the social and economic actors that want to build a national state truly at the service of its citizens

      Which is what they've been doing for the past seven years.

    4. convert the country into just one more province of a divided Spain that does not tolerate national plurality

      Just for two months, after the elections you'll get it back. Spain does not tolerate national plurality; that's why there are four official languages (the common one you know as "Spanish", and three more coofficial in their own regions, Catalan among them). But yeah, we hate national plurality...

    5. our police force at its service

      Same here: it's not "their" police force; it's the Catalan's police force. Those who rule Catalonia have to command the police force, yes.

    6. control the media

      Control the Catalan public television, since it's part of the Catalan government whose function they are exerting until the elections in two months.

    7. educational curriculum

      There are concerns and reports on the history books produced after 35 years of nationalist self-rule (and devolved education) differ somehow in their depiction of the history of Spain.

    8. control them despotically

      Despots exerting their constitutional powers. Aside from that, the courts still work and are open to everyone. Tyranny indeed!

    9. there is a clear dissociation between the democratic will of citizens and the central government

      Such a big dissociation that there are elections in two months.

    10. impose the state’s brute force

      Is he talking about the police during the referendum or about the suspension of the autonomy?

    11. the representatives of the citizens

      Yes, the Spanish tribunals are curious about those people whom they told what they were doing was likely illegal and rather serious, and yet went ahead and did it.

    12. limit rights and freedoms

      How exactly has that happened? The suspension of self-rule in Catalonia is no state of exception; all Catalans enjoy the same civil liberties and rights as before under the Spanish Constitution.

    13. dialogue

      Now, if someone keeps asking for seven years for the same thing you told them you cannot give them; and they don't come up with anything creative or political alliances or majorities, or alternative proposals other than the very same thing; AND they go ahead an do it; would you really say you have rejected dialogue?

    14. quash self-government

      For two months, we don't want to be greedy here.

    15. they will not always be easy to understand.

      In the next days we are going to act as if nothing had happened in the last two months, and prepare to take part in those regional elections called by the central government after we gave them enough grounds to suspend Catalan autonomy for the first time since it was restored in 1979.

    16. road

      A road where, Catalans are asking?

    17. With the referendum’s passing vote

      A referendum disowned by every international institution specialized in monitoring elections. But more importantly, one where only 43% if the census took part. So, a poll without guarantees taken among pro-independence Catalans is enough ground for declaring The Catalan Repulic. Very democratic.

    18. and will continue to be until the day our citizens decide otherwise in a free election.

      This is a very interesting one: this guy's party has accepted to take part in the elections called by the central government. Also, Puigdemont has agreed to accept their results. Are these the "free elections" he's talking about? Are these people their leaders for the next two months then? I know, it sounds less epic put this way.

    19. willing to have its machinery strike millions of citizens

      The "strike" so far has consisted in dismissing the Catalan government and taking over their self-ruling, and call for a snap election in Catalonia in two months to replace it. Behold the state machinery striking at millions of citizens!!

    20. And this is where we drew the line

      How exactly? They've been saying for seven years they would organize a referendum and declare independence eventually.

    21. and by extreme right-wing groups that have acted with complete impunity.

      To my knowledge there were no far-right groups acting on the day of the "referendum". There's been a few incidents during demonstrations against independence, including the stoning of the entrance of the Catalan public TV. But it's not definitively as systematic (rather anecdotical, though a contrast with the image of non-violence pro-independence demonstrators have managed to project) and ominous as he paints it.

    22. We believed that if we voted for independence peacefully, the Spanish government would listen to us

      Because the Spanish government had been saying all THESE SEVEN YEARS that they couldn't vote. So, hey, let's go an vote on our own and against their wishes ONE MORE TIME (yes, they did vote in 2014, though they framed it as a "consultive poll", and the Spanish government let that one fly).

    23. it tried to stop the referendum through the indiscriminate use of batons, threats and coercion.

      That was simply stupid and did reveal some unsettling tendencies running deep in the political culture of the PP, the party in power in Madrid. Let it be said though, that the police was acting under the orders of the Catalan Supreme Court in Barcelona.

    24. The Spanish government wants only servile obedience

      This is kind of a non sequitur.

    25. the Spanish government has never listened; we have always found the same wall of incomprehension and rejection

      The Spanish government has always answered the same when presented with the same question: you can't organize a referendum on secession; think of something else.

    26. The Constitutional Court has suspended every one of the initiatives of the Catalan government.

      The Constitutional Court, as you can see has been obsessed with suspending EVERY single thing the Catalan government did. Those cases he quotes are rather questionable, and usually what the court struck down was a different part of the legal initiative. In some cases, the core of the law was left untouched. But nationalism like BIG SIMPLE facts.

    27. This damage to Catalan society is part of a longstanding strategy of the Spanish government.

      Yes, the Spanish government loves sabotaging a region producing 19% of the country's GDP. They can't get enough of it, how do you think Spain has managed to achieve such high unemployment rates? By sabotaging Catalonia, of course. It's a national sport.

    28. with rushed legislative actions to encourage firms to move out of Catalonia,

      The central government frame it as "facilitating" in response to a genuine concern over legal security. Big firms like knowing in what country they'll be the following month. SO far, 1,700 companies have left Catalonia since October 1st.

    29. we Catalonians have been enduring a sustained effort against our self-government

      Actually, the problem is the rest of Spain has been enduring complete indifference to the Catalan government on the part of Madrid's government.

    30. that most Catalans wanted a peaceful, democratic vote to establish their independence.

      After 7 years of their own regional government hammering with this all day. No matter it was unconstitutional, nor that the Constitution can be changed. They had to do it their own way, forcing Madrid to do as they wanted.

    31. are being prohibited from deciding their future

      Not really, they have one of the highest degrees of self-government in Europe (dare say, the world), and they are overrepresented in the national parliament, where Catalan parties been instrumental to the formation of national governments.

    32. with the support of the public, has one priority

      Such a priority, that after proclaiming the republic they all went away for the weekend.

  10. Oct 2017
    1. These menacing turns of events have been quite bewildering to the public,

      Hyperbole.

    2. Lately, however, the sins of Silicon Valley-led disruption have become impossible to ignore.

      Or you could argue that anyone who did not see this coming had their heads in the sand. Perhaps the problem is more about business model - if investors and public markets drive Facebook to make ad revenue, then it's going to do that as best it can. Would we rather have a national money-making machine, or a platform for social connectedness for a fee?

    1. Justice John G. Roberts Jr., arguing that the South had taken great strides that made the protections of the act unnecessary, based his decision in part on a Senate Judiciary Committee analysis that misinterpreted how the Census Bureau reports race and ethnicity data and wrongly suggested that registration gaps between minorities and whites had shrunk significantly, an error that neither he nor his clerks caught.

      Stunning Omission

    2. ProPublica found that the court cited faulty research or introduced their own errors in nearly a third of the 24 cases that relied on such facts.
    1. But then the regulatory measures they propose, even when they poll well, often lack any direct connection to the massacres themselves.

      One recent example of the "direct connection" requirement, preceded by countless others over the years.

    1. The horror of the mass shooting in Las Vegas is demarcated by the sheer number of casualties inflicted by a single individual — more than 50 dead and more than 500 injured

      The main case that happened recently and has been discussed around the world.

    1. Africa was for the black man, and America was for the white man. He seemed to have forgotten the brown men who were here long before either of our ancestors. He told a white woman, who was holding a sign promoting peace, that she was a race traitor, and despite her wide hips, he’d be willing to show her what a real man was all about. He spouted racist theories about the testosterone levels of black women and the difference in brain sizes between the races. I was unnerved; he truly believed what he was saying.

      This quote is talking about the racism that went on in Charlottesville with the VA students. This is a good example of the racist and sexist things that people believe to be true despite science proving them wrong time and time again. This students account for some of the things that happened at this protest are wild. There are examples of rape culture in here too. I have never been a victim of racism, but I have had unwanted sexually violent things said to me by other people and it is always upsetting to know that these things happen to others in many many different situations. This is important because it highlights the idea that racism is not a problem by itself, there are other issues that come along with it.

  11. Sep 2017
    1. party loyalty increasingly shapes not just votes but social identity, friendship, where you live and whom you hope your children marry.

      Political views are affecting many aspects of life.

    2. our media environment breeds hysteria

      There is always urgency in the media, and the views are always splitting which may create a confused, chaotic environment.

    3. In The New Yorker, Robin Wright quotes a State Department expert on internecine conflict whose personal estimate is that “the United States faces a 60 percent chance of civil war over the next 10 to 15 years.”

      This definitely helps add to my point about tensions in America getting worse

    1. The point of political protest is to change the world. And yet the process matters, too.
    2. To live in the present is not to avoid hard work or strife. Alongside the projects that occupy you in your profession, or in your political life, the telic activities that matter to you, is the atelic process of protesting injustice or doing your job. To value the process is not to flee from work or political engagement. That is why living in the present is not an abdication of ethical responsibility or a recipe for detachment.
    3. To live in the present is not to deny the value of telic activities, of making a difference in the world. That would be a terrible mistake. Nor can we avoid engaging in such activities. But if projects are all we value, our lives become self-subversive, aimed at extinguishing the sources of meaning within them. To live in the present is to refuse the excessive investment in projects, in achievements and results, that sees no inherent value in the process.
    4. To live in the present is to appreciate the value of atelic activities like going for a walk, listening to music, spending time with family or friends. To engage in these activities is not to extinguish them from your life. Their value is not mortgaged to the future or consigned to the past, but realized here and now. It is to care about the process of what you are doing, not just projects you aim to complete.
    5. “If you are learning, you have not at the same time learned.” When you care about telic activities, projects such as writing a report, getting married or making dinner, satisfaction is always in the future or the past. It is yet to be achieved and then it is gone. Telic activities are exhaustible; in fact, they aim at their own exhaustion. They thus exhibit a peculiar self-subversion. In valuing and so pursuing these activities, we aim to complete them, and so to expel them from our lives.
    6. Atelic activities, by contrast, do not by nature come to an end and are not incomplete. In defining such activities, we could emphasize their inexhaustibility, the fact that they do not aim at terminal states. But we could also emphasize what Aristotle does: They are fully realized in the present. “At the same time, one is seeing and has seen, is understanding and has understood, is thinking and has thought.” There is nothing you need to do in order to perform an atelic activity except what you are doing right now. If what you care about is reflecting on your life or spending time with family or friends, and that is what you are doing, you are not on the way to achieving your end: You are already there.
    1. Where are the statues in the former slave states honoring the very large part of the Southern population (beginning with the four million slaves) that sided with the Union rather than the Confederacy? Where are the monuments to the victims of slavery or to the hundreds of black lawmakers who during Reconstruction served in positions ranging from United States senator to justice of the peace to school board official? Excluding blacks from historical recognition has been the other side of the coin of glorifying the Confederacy.

      Good point.

    2. “our” history and culture

      "A great nation does not hide its history. It faces its flaws and corrects them."

    3. Blacks, wrote Chief Justice Roger B. Taney (a statue of whom was removed from public display in Baltimore this week), were and would always be aliens in America.

      Another example of not accepting a culture, flip-side of my other point.

    4. Should American nationality be based on shared values, regardless of race, ethnicity and national origin, or should it rest on “blood and soil,” to quote the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, Va., whom Trump has at least partly embraced?

      Is it possible to have shared values in a culture that is so diverse? And if so, how? And is it moral to guide other's morals? Is it moral to say that my truth is right and your truth is wrong? (Even though yes, slavery is awful, the confederacy was not the brightest moment of our history, but that doesn't take away from the fact that people do see the confederacy in a different light that honors their culture.)

    5. “the history and culture of our great country” raises numerous questions, among them: Who is encompassed in that “our”

      History is written by white men, doesn't include minorities in the "our"

    1. No software system can be free from bugs (or intruders), and users must be mindful of the risks. But the inherent lack of perfect automotive safety doesn’t mean we don’t try to make cars safer. Obviously, people should drive more carefully, but seatbelts, airbags and better car design reduce injury enormously, and that has been great for the industry as well as consumers. The software industry should be no different.

      Exactly!

    1. Now that many of the biggest tech companies operate like media businesses, trafficking in information, they’re in a race to create new products to charm and track consumers.

      I want to explore this whole tech companies acting like media companies thing...

    1. Thanks to the sanitized images of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement that dominate our nation’s classrooms and our national discourse, many Americans imagine that protests organized by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and countless local organizations fighting for justice did not fall victim to violent outbreaks

      King's image and the civil rights movement are sanitized to make them more palatable for white society. How can contemporary teachers present a more realistic account of King and the movement to empower modern day activism?

  12. Aug 2017
    1. we face the imminent danger of all manner of bad history repeating itself while we watch it on TV.

      Gay argues that in such troubled times, it's the responsibility of TV show writers to instead write about a hopeful future tat solves problems, instead of reiterating and promoting inflagration of the issues we already know too well.

    2. We do not make art in a vacuum isolated from sociopolitical context.

      This circles back to "The Practices of Looking" by Sturken and Cartwright which presents the idea of mimesis, or in other words, imitation between life and the media, and between the media and life.

    3. found a way to reimagine history in speculative fiction without making slavery into an intellectual exercise rather than plainly showing it as the grossly oppressive institution it was

      This clarifies the statement that I disagreed with earlier, and now I completely agree with the author. Simply putting forth representations of slavery doesn't do much good... It must challenge the world we live in today.

    4. largely replicates what actually happened, I wonder why people are expending the energy to imagine that slavery continues to thrive when we are still dealing with the vestiges of slavery in very tangible ways.

      I disagree with this statement. While I don't deny that "we are still dealing with the vestiges of slavery in very tangible ways," I see the reimagining in media as showing others through a new lens how people today still live and feel. I see it as a help, instead of a hindrance.

    5. quiet, insidious acts of violence, reminders that racial hatred is alive and well.

      These nooses have been hanging from trees every since the Klu Klux Klan- a sad reminder that we may never heal from the wounds of the past. Just like the masks of the '60s, the racists today hide behind anonymity because they know that what they're doing is wrong, but don't want to face their own ignorance.

    6. They were not the first nor will they be the last to resist acknowledging that the Confederacy lost the Civil War.

      This is an interesting way to think about how hate of this manner still survives today through the expression of Civil War memorabilia. Personally, I think that their racism shouldn't inherently be linked to the Civil War; to me, it gives blame to historical figures long gone and takes blame away from those living today and oppressing others, however, it links white supremacists with the image of stupidity and patheticness, which I kind of like

    7. I suppose it’s an interesting premise, but as is often the case with interesting premises, at what cost?

      I'm intrigued by this statement, because it reminds me that different people interpret works different ways. What some might take as a cautionary tale, others might take as inspiration. It's also dangerous for the writer/artist, as the work might subconsciously reveal the prejudices within the artist him/herself.

    1. If we want to use technology to help people learn, we have to provide information in the way the human mind evolved to receive it. We have to speak the mind’s language, and that includes the language not only of information but also of social cues. Failing to do so will continue to artificially limit the gains that educational technology promises to offer.

      I think it's same as when you read a book. Try to mimic and imagine the picture of the story.

    1. Reflecting on Middlebury, he told me, “Anybody whose approach to ideas that they don’t like is just to scream bloody murder has been failed in their education.” It hasn’t taught them that history is messy, society complicated and truth elusive.

      Wee bit of a straw man here, isn't it?

    2. It’s part of what some angry voters in 2016 were reacting to and rebelling against.

      Implying that progressives, safe spaces, etc. lead to the election of Trump.

    3. we’d be foolish not to treat this as a wake-up call, because it’s of a piece with some of the extraordinary demands that students at other campuses have made, and it’s the fruit of a dangerous ideological conformity in too much of higher education.

      Letting your bias slip through here, buddy.

    4. controversial social scientist

      The speaker was Charles Murray.

      Charles Murray, in short, perpetuates scientific racism, sexism, etc. He also claims that too many children are going to colleges and that, rather than attempting to educate people from all backgrounds and aptitudes, America's success as a nation depends on educating and lifting up the academically gifted.

    5. Physical safety? Absolutely.

      Might we think about how providing a platform for certain ideas and certain voices can create a physically unsafe environment?

    6. slurs

      What slurs were hurled at Charles Murray, a white academic?

      Surely we're not going to imply that Nazi, fascist, eugenicist, etc. are slurs on par with racial slurs...

    7. they should be able to purge their world of perspectives offensive to them

      The flip side of this: should we be forced to tolerate positions we vehemently oppose?

    8. students shouted down and chased away

      Many, if not all, of the students involved received punishment from the college.

    1. Then he whored for his Virginia winery on the way out the door

      This was his response to questions about whether he had talked with Heather Heyer's mom and visiting CVille. Asked if we knew he had a house in CVille. Disgusting!

    1. Just as the hatred came from one side only, the care did not come from “many sides.”
    2. This is not about “free speech.” It never was. There is no “free speech” if anyone brandishes firearms to intimidate those they despise. You can’t argue with the armed. The Nazis told us their intentions clearly on Saturday. This, to them, is about “blood and soil.” They are serious. So are we.

      Right fucking on.

  13. Jul 2017
    1. While innovation — the social process of introducing new things — is important, most technologies around us are old, and for the smooth functioning of daily life, maintenance is more important.

      This seems so obvious, but it's so overlooked. The addiction to constant growth and newness seems so closely tied to our ideas of how markets operate. Consumption and waste trump conservation and repair.

  14. May 2017
    1. they do not constitute an obstruction of justice.

      Even taken in the larger context?! Later firing the man, Confessing on national TV that his intent in doing so was partially to stop the investigation into his campaign?!...

    2. are routinely made to investigators and prosecutors.

      Trump is not a lawyer.

    3. But telling the F.B.I. director that someone is a “good guy”

      Let's focus on the second half of the statement.

    4. Indeed, when President Obama endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in June 2016 — during the height of the F.B.I.’s investigation into Secretary Clinton’s private email server

      Not really a fair comparison, a direct, private 1:1 statement versus a public indircetly related one.

    5. As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, “for bribery there must be a quid pro quo — a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act.”

      Like someone's job, for example, and whether they keep it or lose it?