28 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. Provide specific feedback to improve perfor-mance

      This may be a possible student benefit, but it often relies upon the instructor adding those specifics. Adding too many specific criteria to rubrics makes them unwieldy and potentially overwhelming.

  2. Apr 2021
    1. {Graphics}☐ Great - ☐ Good - ☑ Simple - ☐ Bad{Gameplay}☐ Great - ☑ Good - ☐ Meh - ☐ Unplayable{Audio}☐ Great - ☑ Good - ☐ Nothing Special -☐ Bad{Audience}☑ Kids - ☑ Teens - ☑ Adults{Difficulty} ☐ Too easy -☑ Just Right - ☐ Easy to Play/Hard to Master - ☐ Too Hard{Story}☐ Great - ☐ Good -☐ Simple - ☐ Barely a Story - ☑ No Story{Game Time}☐ 100+ - ☐ 61-99 - ☐ 39-60 - ☐ 11-30 -☑ 0-10 {Overall}Very enjoyable Chess Puzzle Game that should appeal to both Chess and Puzzle Gamers.
    1. [0.5] Controls & Training & Help[0.1] Menu & Settings[0.4] Sound & Music[0.1] Graphics[0.1] Game Design[0.3] Game Story[0.1] Game Content[0] Completion time (level/game)?[0] is it Enjoyable & Fun?[0] Could it hold a spot in Favorites? (& if the Game can be repeatedly played again)[0] BONUS point: Multi-Player related[0] BONUS point: Review for VRStars received: 1.6/10
  3. Mar 2021
    1. One word for each aspect of this game. Story - N/A.Gameplay - Excellent.Graphics - Minimal.Sound - Splendid.Music - Elegant.Overall - Delightful.
  4. Feb 2021
    1. [0.4] Controls & Training & Help[0.2] Menu & Settings[0.2] Sound & Music[0.1] Graphics[0.2] Game Design[0.3] Game Story[0.2] Game Content[0.4] Time to complete feels ok? (& if the Game can be repeatedly played again)[0] is it Enjoyable & Fun?[0] Could it hold a spot in Favorites?[0] BONUS point: Multi-Player related[0] BONUS point: Review for VR
  5. Dec 2020
  6. Apr 2020
    1. Rubric | Measurements

      subjective measures and objective measures.

  7. Mar 2020
    1. Art Rubric for Assessment of the Discussion & Writing on Art History, Aesthetics and Art Criticism - an Assessment Form

      rubric for writing about art

  8. Nov 2019
  9. May 2019
  10. Dec 2018
  11. Sep 2018
  12. Aug 2017
  13. Jul 2016
    1. The Winchester manuscript contains no title, no table of contents, and no page numbering.  As you can imagine, reading such a text would be difficult without graphic assistance.  The Winchester scribes provided it in the text by setting off names of characters in red ink, a practice known as "rubrication."  The names in red also included two non-human nouns which acted as agents doing things in the text, the "Sankgreal" or Holy Grail (which healed and wounded like a knight), and the "Rounde Table," which was a concept in whose name knights might act of take oaths.  However, the scribes main ongoing assistance to readers occurs in the manuscript's  margins.
    1. It is written right-to-left in hieratic, the Egyptian cursive form of hieroglyphs, in black ink with explanatory glosses in red ink.
    1. The text of a Book of the Dead was written in both black and red ink, regardless of whether it was in hieroglyphic or hieratic script. Most of the text was in black, with red used for the titles of spells, opening and closing sections of spells, the instructions to perform spells correctly in rituals, and also for the names of dangerous creatures such as the demon Apep.[57] The black ink used was based on carbon, and the red ink on ochre, in both cases mixed with water.
  14. Jul 2015
  15. Jun 2015