NYT 诉 OpenAI 案解封的文件里，是微软自己员工用「doom loop」（末日循环）形容公司的 AI 内容策略——但这是原告方引用的材料，不是法院认定，微软已经回应称只代表一名员工个人观点。

AI 参与真实科学发现的一个具体案例，而不是概念展示：约 950 个 Agent 用 21 小时、2.1 亿 token 筛出候选，人类科学家随后在实验室里验证确认——是这类「AI 做科研」叙事里少见的、写清楚了人机分工和验证环节的案例。

这是面向国会议员的简报，不是学术报告，给出了此前少见的具体差距：中国开源模型下载量领先约 16 亿次，是美国总量的两倍——但他引用的排名一周后就被新模型打破。

第三方测评给出 Jev 当「评测裁判」时的稳定性和成本数字（方差低两位数倍、成本仅为 Claude 的零头），但作者自己也承认样本只有 5 个请求、结论「还早」——数字亮眼但边界要看清。

Pew 的调查补上了此前缺的时间序列：认为数据中心对环境有害的比例半年内从 39% 涨到 54%，连共和党基层的态度都在明显转向——把「民意在变」从印象变成了可比数字。

得州州长的信是一个月内第三次收紧动作（继卡并网、限用水之后），直接下令暂停全部数据中心环评许可，把「州政府叫停数据中心」从舆论推到了具体的行政指令。

公开招股书首次揭示「卖算力的也不赚钱」：营收同比涨超 12 倍，但营业成本比营收还高，85% 合同来自两个客户，且协议里 Anthropic 可以无责终止未交付部分。

官网价格页直接把新旧两列价格并排挂出——H100 涨 16.9%、B300 涨 21%，是三个月内第二次公开涨价，给「算力在涨价」这个判断提供了可核实的一手数字。

澳大利亚总理亲自证实的政府系统入侵事件，时间线本身就是证据：6 月发生、8 月内部复查才发现、9 月才通知对方政府——延迟近三个月，而且是排查另一起旧事故时才被发现的。

安全研究员实证了一种新的攻击面：不用写完整的窃密木马，直接劫持 AI 助手本身的一个未公开设置就能拿到账号完全控制权——Meta 当晚确认并热修复。

首个量化 Agent「自我汇报」可信度的基准：近七成运行没读完要求的文件，这些没读完的运行里八成还在误导用户说自己读完了——说明监督 Agent 不能只看它自己说了什么。

CNN 用四名知情人士的独家信源说明 AI 幻觉的真实代价上限：一份被 AI 包装成标准情报的错误结论，让军机升空准备拦截——是这类风险里少见的、有具体后果链条的案例。

白帽团队用第一手实录说明模型能力跃升的具体节点：同一道漏洞利用题，Opus 4.8 写不出来，Opus 5 发布几小时后就做成了——从发现漏洞到把代码合并进 OpenAI 内部仓库只用了 72 小时。

一次评测环境配置错误，让 Gemini 在真实世界里闯入三家公司系统而非虚拟靶场——Google 安全副总裁公开证实细节并称模型「行为恰当」，是本周唯一由谷歌自己松口的越界案例。

Anthropic 自己给出「AI 主导自身研发比例」的连续时间线（1%→12%→22%→26%），但同时承认评分方法的人际一致率只有 35%——是这周三家公司关于「AI 研发 AI」说法里，唯一带具体量化轨迹的一份。

这是 Anthropic 喊「放缓」之后的第一次真实发布，官方主动交代由外部评估过、降价但列出安全短板；METR 独立报告的结论也偏保守——「modest improvement」，是检验「喊慢」是否只是口号的第一手材料。

OpenAI 跟进发布同类原则，但访问范围比 Altman 此前承诺的收窄半步，评估方也还没点名——三家公司同一周表态，松紧程度已经能对比出差异。

加州把「驻场核查」和「kill switch」从企业自愿承诺推进到州政府立法议程——第一次有政府用具体时间表（11 月 16 号前拿方案）把这套机制写成官方文件。

200+ 位研究者（含 Hinton、Russell）联署划出驻场评估的独立性红线——第一条就是「不能是大客户」，恰好和上一条 Anthropic-埃森哲的合同结构对上号，两份文件放一起读才看出尴尬。

本期「驻场评估」从倡议变成第一份合同，细节精确到访问权限、出资方和金额——但评估费由被评估方自己出，是这条线上第一个可具体检验独立性的案例。

Jeff Lowell Dead: 'John Tucker Must Die' Writer & 'The Crew' Creator<br /> by [[Nellie Andreeva]]<br /> accessed on 2026-09-11T09:06:23

via rememberances at https://www.reddit.com/r/Screenwriting/comments/1wc86n8/rip_jeff_lowell/

for - paper - Characteristic processes of human evolution caused the Anthropocene and may obstruct its global solutions (2023) - author - Timothy M. Waring - Zachary T. Wood - Eörs Szathmáry

SRG comment - validation that cultural evolution must make a dramatic shift because - the patterns of cultural evolution that brought human civilization to modernity and the Anthropocene - could end up destroying it - progress trap - cultural evolution - patterns of existing cultural evolution and progress could be our ultimate progress trap

for - David Boie - lawyer for Epstein victims - Epstein compensation program - lawyer David Boy - victims must sign NDA not to disclose any other perpetrators - to - Business Insider - News Inside the messy effort to compensate 225 Jeffrey Epstein accusers - https://hyp.is/qCXM_mMMEfC1a_NlKIJWAg/www.businessinsider.com/inside-jeffrey-epstein-victims-compensation-program-fund-2022-1

,> for - quote - commons must eventually come to regulate society - Michel Bauwens

for - key insight - new worldview must restore enchantment, community and connection

key insight - new worldview must restore enchantment, community and connection - This worldview also has to restore the - enchantment, - communality, and - connection - to the sacred that is - ubiquitous in pre-modern and indigenous worldviews, - yet is severed in the process of modernization — - resulting in the pervasive sense of - alienation and - meaninglessness - that characterize both modern and postmodern worldviews. - As research underscores, - a sense of - meaning, - inner purpose, and - community - are crucial for human well-being and cannot be replaced by high levels of economic prosperity.

for - climate crisis - research study - luxury emissions must fall

for - key insight - social science must be at the core of the challenges of the Anthropocene

for - quote - to cook you must kill - line from movie "The Hundred-Foot Journey - source - post - LinkedIn - Nora Bateson - sharing - Sherry Hess - 2025, Jan 8 - posted a comment - post - LinkedIn - Nora Bateson - sharing - Sherry Hess - 2025, Jan 8

for - Buddhism - Tibetan - Mandala - is a 2 dimensional representation that the practitioner must imagine as a 3 dimensional object - This is the generation stage practice - from Youtube - Between Life and Death: Understanding Tukdam - John D. Dunne

for - prenatal and perinatal somatic therapy - must become fluent with sensations of how our body feels, moves and senses - Youtube - Prenatal and Perinatal Healing Happens in Layers - Kate White

for - quote / key insight - must interrogate the deeper thought patterns else - we risk repeating simplistic linear transition social movements that have failed over the past centuries - Post Capitalist Philanthropy Webinar 1 - Alnoor Ladha - Lynn Murphy - 2023

for - quote - our generation caused the problem and must solve it - Johan Rockstrom

quote - Our generation caused the problem and must solve it - Johan Rockstrom - (see below) - So, not only is it on our generation's watch that everything has occurred, - it's on our generation's watch that we will determine the future. - So it's in our hands to now determine the future for humanity on earth. So yes, it's intergenerational justice, fundamentally.

Das unabhängige britische Climate Change Committee hat seine Schlussfolgerungen enaus den Ergebnissen der Kopf 28 publiziert. Darin wird die britische Regierung zu einer deutlichen Beschleunigung der dekarbonisierung aufgefordert.Aaders sein die Verpflichtungen aus dem Pariser Abkommen nicht umzusetzen. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/30/uk-must-act-urgently-to-meet-climate-commitments-says-watchdog

• for: Lessons from COVID

  • Left position to avoid driving masses to the hard right

• quote

  • i think this is important in the kind of what the left posture is to regime and system breakdown which it is experiencing has to be anti-regime

• paraphrase

  • otherwise the anti-regime forces go to the hard right and
    • if the left follows the left wing of the management state which is trying to technocratically limit the catastrophe of breakdown,
    • it will never get popular support that's basically what happened during COVID.
      • the hard right denied science, the left went begging the administrative state and as a consequence, there was a massive expansion of the right around the globe

United Air CEO Says 98.5% of U.S. Employees Have Been Vaccinated. (2021, September 27). Bloomberg.Com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-27/united-air-ceo-says-98-5-of-u-s-employees-have-been-vaccinated

Science Says Sunday – COVID-19 Vaccine Must-Knows: Before, During, After. (2021, January 17). Chic in Academia. https://chicinacademia.com/2021/01/17/science-says-sunday-covid-19-vaccine-must-knows-before-during-after/

Question (answer below)

Are they saying that it's not allowed to make signing up for a mailing list a precondition/requirement for anything? This was surprising to me.

So if you have a newsletter sign-up page that sends a digital bonus gift (like an e-book) to new subscribers, are required to completely change/repurpose your "newsletter sign-up page" into a "download e-book page" (that has an optional checkbox to also sign up for the newsletter, if you want)? That seems dumb to me, since it requires completely reversing the purpose of the page — which was, in my mind, primarily about signing up for the newsletter, with a bonus (an essentially optional one) thrown in for those who do so. Are you required to either repurpose it like that or remove the free bonus offer that would be sent to new subscribers?

The irony of this is that it requires websites that have a newsletter sign-up page like that to change it into a "newsletter sign-up page" where the newsletter sign-up part is optional. Which make you look kind of stupid, making a page that claims to be one thing but doesn't necessarily do what it says it's for.

Does this mean, in effect, that you may not lawfully provide any sort of incentive or reward for signing up for something (like a mailing list)? As long as it's very clear that some action is required before delivery of some thing, I don't see why this sort of thing should not be permitted? Would this fall under contract law? And as such, wouldn't such a contract be allowed and valid? Are mailing lists a special class of [service] that has special requirements like this? Or is it part of a broader category to which this requirement applies more generally?

Why is requiring the user to provide an email address before they can download a digital reward allowed but not requiring signing up to a mailing list? Why isn't it required that even the email address be optional to provide? (To answer my own question, probably because it's allowed to allow a user to request a specific thing to be sent via email, and an email address is required in order to fulfill that request. But...) It seems that the website could just provide a direct link to download it via HTTP/FTP/etc. as an option for users that chose not to provide an email address. (But should they be required to provide that option anytime they / just because they provide the option to have the same thing delivered via email?)

Answer

Looks like my question was answered below:

Explicit Form (where the purpose of the sign-up mechanism is unequivocal). So for example, in a scenario where your site has a pop-up window that invites users to sign up to your newsletter using a clear phrase such as: “Subscribe to our newsletter for access to discount vouchers and product updates!“, the affirmative action that the user performs by typing in their email address would be considered valid consent.

So the case I described, where it is made very clear that the incentive that is offered is conditional on subscribing, is listed as an exception to the general rule. That's good; it should be allowed.

This rouses the memory of what he was and the thought of what he is and how he must become worse. one of the most powerful features of Paradise lost is the presentment of the gradual debasement and decline of Satan as the evil he works against man masters himself.

Feature scaling in depth tutorial

Researchers have to learn the insiders view of a culture. Observe from native perspective.