- Oct 2020
-
wiobyrne.com wiobyrne.com
-
and serve as pre-prints to work that may live later on, or always exist in their current format
Thinking of a personal site as a pre-print server is an interesting concept and somewhat similar to the idea of a commonplace book.
-
- Aug 2020
-
ropensci.org ropensci.org
-
‘OSF: A Project Management Service Built for Research - ROpenSci - Open Tools for Open Science’. Accessed 10 August 2020. https://ropensci.org/blog/2020/08/04/osf/.
-
- May 2020
-
nexus.od.nih.gov nexus.od.nih.gov
-
Santangelo, G. (2020, April 15). New NIH Resource to Analyze COVID-19 Literature: The COVID-19 Portfolio Tool. NIH Extramural Nexus. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2020/04/15/new-nih-resource-to-analyze-covid-19-literature-the-covid-19-portfolio-tool/
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Matias, J. N. (2020). Natematias/covid-19-social-science-research. https://github.com/natematias/covid-19-social-science-research (Original work published 2020)
-
- Apr 2020
-
publons.com publons.com
-
Publons.com. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2020, from https://publons.com/
-
- Jun 2018
-
-
“pre-print” versions of manuscripts
This is just another, albeit specific, form of academic samizdat. https://indieweb.org/academic_samizdat
-
- Mar 2017
-
-
If Kriegeskorte is invited by a journal to write a review, first he decides whether he’s interested enough to review it. If so, he checks whether there’s a preprint available—basically a final draft of the manuscript posted publicly online on one of several preprint servers like arxiv and biorxiv. This is crucial. Writing about a manuscript that he’s received in confidence from a journal editor would break confidentiality—talking about a paper before the authors are ready. If there’s a preprint, great. He reviews the paper, posts to his blog, and also sends the review to the journal editor.
Interesting workflow and within his rights.
-