“related”.
Should these quotes be `` (double backtick) '' (double apostraphe)?
"the" missing
a
"propose" or something like that missing
=
\leq
bound bound
π
This \(\pi\) should be mix as at the end of the sentence
.
amazing using !
nnow
2
this \(^2\) should be inside the expectation
0
The prime should not be there
y
'-' missing
min
This should be \(\min_M\)
sckit-learn
typo: scikit-learn
.
typo: '.' -> ','
[period instead of a comma]
we
remove
d
This should be a \(k\)
≥
they are using what proposition A.1 is saying, which has a typo, it should be \(\frac{\Delta_k (t_j - t_{j-1})}{4} \exp (-t_{j-1} \Delta^2/2)\)
max1≤k≤MMXj=1∆ktj4exp(−tj−1∆2k/2)−1∆k
The \(\sum_{j=1}^M\) should be inside the bracket. The \(-\frac{1}{\Delta_k}\) is not part of the sum.
t
This numerator should be \(t_j - t_{j-1}\)
1
A \(\Delta\) is missing here
“pulls it back”
minor quibble, maybe this should be surrounded by parantheses
k
L missing
amont
among
we
remove
mee
meer?
xs
this shouldn't be here
x3yif and only ifdxù3e y
Maybe x and y (at least y) should be said to be natural numbers here, but then again it is fairly obvious from the context.
Writedzeforthe smallest natural number greater thanz2R, and writebzcfor the largest naturalnumber smaller thanz2R, e
I think both of these definitions should include "or equal to", especially given the immediate following example of x <= 3y if and only if ...
s
Not really a typo, but slightly confusing since s
is also used for a different funciton in the same example in the following paragraph.
Q
C
need
delete?
compiler
∇
\(\nabla^2\)
aandb
typo: a_1 and _a2
Nielson
Nelson (cf. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nelson)
Nielson
Nelson (cf. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nelson)
be be
typo
Pease
please
Morever
I think it's typo of Moreover
x
x_k
should should
distribution a random
of a random variable
“wishifu
typo
)
typo, this parenthesis should be before the "<<"
closes
typo
its the
typo: remove one of the two words
it p
is
guaranteed not too
guaranteed not to.
this exercises:
Typo
geneerating
Typo
if (x == []) then total else sumOfList (total + (head x)) (tail x)
Replace x with lst.
simply
Typo
that
Typo
ineffient
inefficient
covfefe
typo
wth with
typo
and your
typo
your the
typo
announced6
typo
where
/s/where/whether ?
a people
beset
it's adoption
it's adoption
corperations
corporations
it's community contributions
it
then
a single points
wich
h
the creation a new author
of
reccomend
urbansim
panning
proscriptive
prescriptive?
modulde
Typo
and
superfluous
the documents were coded
looks like a missing "that"
An
this should be "A"
non-
seems wrong here
WAARN
This should be "WWARN".
Threre
typo
a useful for
useful for
)
Missing period at the end of the sentence.
convetred
by which by which
Twice "by which"
is
are
affect
s/affect/effect
published will
published and will
and trasfer
and transfer
return at
back to
set the
sets the
Agend
Agenda
externatlities
externality
healtcare
healthcare
pubic resources
public ressources - pubic ressources sind was gaaanz anderes ;-)
renats
rents
Inhaltlich: vgl. die Anmerkung auf S. 17 zu Big Data-Auswertungen in Berlin, die dort ebenfalls nach den "großen" kleinen gesucht haben.
experimeng
experiment
it ways
it in ways
arleady
already
hegemoncy
hegemony
need to reformulated
need to be reformulated
That said, it just so happens that many political forces that do question many parts of the neoliberal agenda to have some influence in c
That said, many political forces that do question many parts of the neoliberal agenda happen to have some influence in c
themselves
. [Punkt]
a popular
Das muss wohl "app" statt "add" heißen hier.
they advanced
they advance
like neutral
neural
bsolet
obsolete
exercises
exercise
sprang
sprung
n
-
a
-
literary
literacy (?)
quantity
quantify
celever
clever
surrendred
surrendered
the gtlobe
the globe
Simens
Siemens
there corrletion
Typo?
I guess it's "their correlation"
may
may ->many
right
typo: should be 'left'
at the start of the night century
What?
parti
partie
cue
I think you mean 'queue'
table
cable?
english
English (capital E)
Angree
Strongly Agree
analisys
analysis
reviews
reviewers
chanche
chance
back-compatible
backwards compatible
HTLM5
HTML5
oritented
oriented
trasferred
transfered
Part of helping your individually
wording/typo
e .
spacing typo
firsr
whole
Progroamming
Typo :)
Proper citation and deposition of data generated from their study Proper citation of 3rd party or previously generated data used in their study
Should be indented.
the
Seems redundant, maybe typo.
Well-document
Well-documented?
She
Probably "the"
(x0;t0)2bdy(dom(f))
Confirmed that this should be \(bdy(epi(f))\), not \(bdy(dom(f))\)
Appel has made many different tutorials
Strange typo for an Apple-focused site.
в октябре́́
This word has double stress.
An re cen
Typo: a recent
suggest druggable target
Typo: missing a
aNatural Capital Committee
Minor typo in the description of the Bill
disease
should be "diseases"
age
remove this word: age
req.param('_id')
Should this be req.param['_id'] ? Or req.param._id ?
id="edit"
There are two elements with the same id. Was this one supposed to have an id of 'delete'?
freedom to thinik
{cringe}
Actor
Should be AActor
Object
Should be UObject?
UE_LOG(LogTemp, Log, TEXT("Found UObject named: %s"), *CurrentObject.GetName());
Should be:
UE_LOG(LogTemp, Log, TEXT("Found UObject named: %s"), *(CurrentObject->GetName()));
(especially the well-off) are able to stay afloat more easily then poor population
Typo in "... more easily then..." change "then" to "than"
The parentheses in the first part "(especially the well-off)" doesn't match the next lack of parentheses around "poor populations" -- they're both referencing the same subject, and so the logical connection doesn't make sense to me.
TL;DR: The sentence should still make sense with parentheses removed.
Test: "Humans are able to stay afloat more easily then poor populations..."
Does it make sense? Not to my mind (unless you're ironically implying that poor populations are inhuman! maybe a sarcastic remark on those who seem to think/feel that way?).
Consider changing this to: "Well-off populations of humans are able to stay afloat more easily than poor populations..."
... or something else that leaves the connections consistent.
Creeative
descend
descent
examing
Examining
emergence of Force11 ̇OA provides
Broken sentence, but can't quite figure out what's wrong.
said on the of the vol-unteers
should be: 'said one of the'
I guess we’ll see if that’s something other people want too.” At press time, it was to early to tell
1) TYPO: 'it was to early to tell.': change the first instance of 'to' -> 'too'
It will then read: 'it was too early to tell.'
2) Given the close proximity of two instances of 'too' (the first being the last word in the speaker's quotation, the second being our now-corrected typo)... consider replacing one of those instances with some other equivalent.
The first instance would be easier, but less casual-sounding, to replace; options include:
The second instance would be a bit trickier; options include:
.... This said, my immediate thought is that 'it was too early to tell' is an open, receptive/neutral, and -- importantly -- potentially optimistic phrasing. I.e., "We don't know yet! The future could hold anything!"
That's a much more optimistic outlook, compared to terms like 'unclear' -- that seems murky and potentially doubtful to my mind.
So I like the way you phrased it initially.
The goal of “Making the world work for everyone” is vague and can be in-terpreted in many ways. I believe that is it’s power.
The possessive form of "it" is an irregular form of possessive in lacking an apostrophe, probably to avoid confusion with the contraction of "it is."
(This is yet another grammar rule I memorized in public schools. :p)
It is a question; a challenge.
Strictly speaking, semi-colons are only used to separate clauses which could, on their own (as they stand), each be a grammatically complete sentence. The test? [You'll notice that last remark wasn't a grammatically complete sentence, by the way.]
Replace the semi-colon with a period; see if it works.
Replace the semi-colon with a period. See if it works.
"A challenge" isn't a grammatically complete sentence. Of course, stylistic licenses are sometimes taken to defy the rule of "every clause between two periods must be a complete sentence."
In this case, though, I'd suggest:
Either or both should work. (Personally, I like the second option best: 'It is a question: a challenge.' ) That said, if you prefer it the way it is for style, go for it. It just stuck out in my mind, but I am a fiend for proper (or obsessive) semi-colon usage.
letters,“Those who love peace must learn
insert a space between the comma and the open-quote.
NOTE: On the website (html version), the lack of a space is clearly visible.
(Although visually, in this pdf, it looks like there is a space -- but there actually isn't!! ... It's just how the pdf is rendering on my screen that gives the illusion of a space-character being present. If you try to highlight it, you'll notice there's no extra character between the comma and the quote-mark.)
instead against
typo: insert "of", as so: "instead of against"
fuelling volunteers
change to "fueling" (one L).
side note: I am all in favour of using British or Commonwealth spelling! If so, then it should be consistent across the entire published work (but I didn't think that it was your intent to use British spelling here ;p).
No single person or group is could
delete the word "is"
underwear.
Consider removing the period at the end of this list.
It's a stylistic or slight syntax concern: maintain the existing conventions already in place (no periods at the end of list-items). NB: Other editors might disagree with me in this instance.... IMO, it appears a little more awkward than if it were left out, but that's pretty subjective.
we will send and email
change 'and' to 'an'
(or if you would be if you knew that at least 1000 people would be out there with you)
needs a period, AFTER the closing of the parenthesis, like so:
(or if you would be if you knew that at least 1000 people would be out there with you).
with other spontaneously groups around the world
change 'spontaneously' to:
24 hour
insert a hyphen: "24-hour"
(I'm relatively certain this is the most widely-accepted way of writing it; other interpretations are possible, but I think the hyphen applies here.)
waste a lot of energy telling people “no”.
change: move the period, so it's inside the quotation mark.
Placing commas and periods inside dialogue quotation marks is proper syntax/grammar in normal writing. .... It's improper syntax only in technical/computer writing. However, it's possible that -- stylistically -- this may have changed in recent years, as technical (and technology) writers have influenced mainstream writing somewhat.
event,” Said
change "Said" to lower-case "s"
but 3 is still pretty good.”
My understanding of strict grammar rules, with regard to writing numbers, is as follows:
(Side note: I don't recall what the rule is for the number ten itself!)
Anyway, that being said: My sense is that in journalistic writing (and in fiction, and in novels), one can take stylistic licenses; it's entirely up to you, based on what style, context and goals you have in mind.
If it were me, I'd spell it out (but it's your call): "but three is still pretty good."
the set of mothers arises as is the image of
henma1››—Af›—Bb›—nis
For example ifX ta,b,c,d,e,fuandX1 tb,d,euthenX1ÑXand we turn thatinto the functionX—X1given bybfi—b,dfi—d,efi—e
Flip the X and X' in X -> X'
only for a 2,000calorie daily diet
Shouln't there be a space between "2,000", and "calorie"?
All of these use cases share the a fundamental requirement for a API to find text.
"share ~the~ a fundamental"
structure can not be directly reconstructed
cannot