141 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
  2. May 2022
    1. Exemplar output (in JSON)

      json [ { "oci": "02001010806360107050663080702026306630509-0200101080636102703040309", "citing": "10.1186/1756-8722-6-59", "cited": "10.1186/ar3439", "creation": "2013", "timespan": "P2Y", "journal_sc": "no", "author_sc": "no" }, { "oci": "02001010806360107050663080702026306630509-0200101080636102704000806", "citing": "10.1186/1756-8722-6-59", "cited": "10.1186/ar4086", "creation": "2013", "timespan": "P1Y", "journal_sc": "no", "author_sc": "no" }, { "oci": "02001010806360107050663080702026306630509-020010200003619122437020001023704023707090006", "citing": "10.1186/1756-8722-6-59", "cited": "10.1200/jco.2012.42.7906", "creation": "2013", "timespan": "P0Y", "journal_sc": "no", "author_sc": "no" }, { "oci": "02001010806360107050663080702026306630509-02003010009360008080300010805370200010237060604070907", "citing": "10.1186/1756-8722-6-59", "cited": "10.3109/08830185.2012.664797", "creation": "2013", "timespan": "P0Y", "journal_sc": "no", "author_sc": "no" }

    1. COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations

      COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations, is an RDF dataset containing details of all the citations that are specified by the open references to DOI-identified works present in Crossref, as of the latest COCI update*

      [...]

      Open Citation Identifiers

      Each Open Citation Identifier [[OCI]] has a simple structure: the lower-case letters "oci" followed by a colon, followed by two numbers separated by a dash (e.g. https://w3id.org/oc/index/coci/ci/02001010806360107050663080702026306630509-02001010806360107050663080702026305630301), in which the first number identifies the citing work and the second number identifies the cited work.

    1. Key to DataCite service is the concept of a long-term or persistent identifier. A persistent identifier is an association between a character string and a resource. Resources can be files, parts of files, persons, organisations, abstractions, etc. DataCite uses Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs)(2) at the present time and is considering the use of other identifier schemes in the future.
    1. You might see (or inherit responsibility for) older DOIs which contain other characters, and require special treatment in a URL: Encode hash or pound sign # as %23 Do not encode left bracket (or less than) < as &lt; and right bracket (or greater than) > as &gt; when resolving DOIs or retrieving metadata from our REST API to retrieve the metadata (see below) Do not encode forward slash / when resolving DOIs or retrieving metadata from our REST API
      • EXCEPTIONS to DOI rules
    1. First, a few rules Rules are shared by all DOI registration agencies. Each DOI must be unique Only use approved characters: DOI suffixes can be any alphanumeric string that includes combinations the following approved characters: Letters of the Roman alphabet, A-Z (see below on case insensitivity) Numbers, 0-9 -._;()/ (hyphen, period, underscore, semicolon, parentheses, forward slash). Note that em and en dashes are not approved characters. Note, some older (pre-2008) DOIs which contain other characters. Learn more about suffixes containing special characters. Suffixes are case insensitive, so 10.1006/abc is the same in the system as 10.1006/ABC. Note that using lowercase is better for accessibility.
      • DOIs RULES
  3. Mar 2022
  4. Feb 2022
    1. Publishers are also encouraged to follow DOI best practices defined by Crossref, notably: A distinct DOI should be created for each version of a title deposited with CrossRef. Any title changes requiring a new ISSN should result in a new title-level DOI as well in order to ensure consistency between CrossRef and ISSN Registries. A title-level DOI should resolve to a response page that displays the same title and ISSN recorded in the ISSN Registry and in CrossRef database. Once assigned, a title-level DOI should be maintained. Responsibility for maintaining a title-level DOI transfers to the new owner when title ownership is transferred.
      • DOI
    2. Among official DOI registration agencies, CrossRef specializes in scholarly and professional publications and it assigns DOI prefixes to publishers. The latter can thus identify articles or book chapters with DOIs. They are also strongly encouraged to create DOIs for journal titles
      • Crossref
    1. https://www.zotero.org/save?type=

      URL for adding URL, ISBN, DOI, PMID, or arXiv IDs to one's Zotero account.

      I've created a mobile shortcut using the URL Forwarder app to accomplish this with a share functionality after highlighting an ISBN.

      Might also try using https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.srowen.bs.android&hl=en with the added custom search query custom search URL https://www.zotero.org/save?q=%s to see if that might work as well. This should allow using a scanner to get ISBN barcodes into the system as well. Useful for browsing at the bookstore.

      I should also create a javascript bookmarklet for this pattern as well.

      See also: - https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/77178/barcode-scanner - https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/76471/scanning-isbn-barcode-to-input-books-to-zotero-library

      Alternate URL paths for this: - https://www.zotero.org/save?type=isbn - https://www.zotero.org/save?q=

  5. Jan 2022
    1. Here’s an even more magical trick. Download that PDF to your file system, load it into a third tab, and annotate again. Now you’ll see all three annotations in all three tabs!

      Since Hypothesis doesn’t know that the local copy of the PDF came from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168597&type=printable, or that it’s related to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168597, how is that possible?

      The answer is that the PDF standard defines a unique identifier, or “fingerprint,” that authoring tools encode into the PDFs they create. When you use the Hypothesis client to annotate web-hosted PDF, it captures the fingerprint and sends it to the server.

    2. It was already the case that you could search Hypothesis for the DOI, like so:

    3. First, here’s a magic trick you might not realize Hypothesis has up its sleeve. Consider this PLOS One article. Annotate it in one tab, then open a second tab and annotate the PDF version there. You’ll see both annotations in both tabs. How is that possible?

      The answer is that when scholarly publishers provide HTML versions of articles, they typically include metadata that points to PDF versions of the same articles. Here’s one way that happens:

      <meta name=”citation_pdf_url” content=”http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168597&type=printable”>
      

      Hypothesis remembers the correspondence between the HTML and PDF versions, and coalesces annotations across them.

    1. adamsmith October 15, 2018 Add Item by Identifier will work for any DOI registered in Crossref or a half-dozen other DOI registrars Really? I thought we currently "just" covered CrossRef, DataCite, and Airiti? - which does still mean it almost always works; that's probably 95%+ of active DOIs, but if there's code already that covers others, that'd be good to know as I was just going to put some work towards that. dstillman October 15, 2018 We also have DOI translators for EIDR and mEDRA.
      • DOI agencies
      • Zotero probes them, when search for a DOI
    1. Each case-insensitive DOI is first normalized to lower case letters
      • WHY??? WHERE CAN THE NORM BE READ?
    1. DOI registration agencies such as Crossref, DataCite and mEDRA collect bibliographic metadata about the works they link to.
      • DOI agencies
      • 2022-01: zotero field DOI: WITHOUT https, NOR URL
    1. More recently, there has been a strong movement to move the web over from HTTP to the more secure HTTPS protocol. Technical changes also made it possible to link DOIs via the shorter doi.org instead of dx.doi.org. Together, this let Crossref change its recommended format to https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000008.
      • REASONS FOR CHANGES
    2. As Crossref explains in their guidelines, the original concise doi:10.1037/rmh0000008 format was recommended with the hope that web browsers would one day automatically recognize and hyperlink these DOIs.
      • CONCISE format
    3. Effective March 2017, Crossref, an influential DOI registration agency, now recommends the following format: https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000008 Note the use of “https” instead of “http”, and “doi.org” instead of “dx.doi.org”.
    1. _re_id["doi"] = re.compile(r"\b10\.\d{4,}(?:\.\d+)*\/(?:(?!['\"&<>])\S)+\b") _re_id["bibcode"] = re.compile(r"\b\d{4}\D\S{13}[A-Z.:]\b") _re_id["arxiv"] = re.compile(r"\b(?:\d{4}\.\d{4,5}|[a-z-]+(?:\.[A-Za-z-]+)?\/\d{7})\b")
      • REGEX
  6. Dec 2021
    1. The redirection is functionally equivalent to the way the DOI system uses a proxy server, doi.org (or dx.doi.org, an earlier syntax which continues to be supported), which re-interprets DOI name queries into http

      dx.doi.org is EARLY syntax

    1. There are interfaces for people (to look up small numbers of DOIs): Metadata Search, and Simple Text Query.

      2 ways

    2. Here is a comparison of the metadata retrieval options

      SEE

    1. ShortDOIs are great for sharing a quick link over email or for display on presentation slides, but they shouldn’t be used in publications (eg, this may interfere with citation cross-linking, which relies on matching DOIs)

      Well, don't use them! better the compatible way

    2. I would not be surprised if the service were shut down at some point.

      hahaha. changes for the worse!

    3. You should not use shortDOI in references

      ???

    1. The reason for overly long DOIs are the local provisions to prevent collision of automatically generated DOIs

      ok

  7. Nov 2021
  8. Oct 2021
  9. Sep 2021
  10. Jul 2021
  11. Jun 2021
  12. Feb 2021
    1. innovative learning involves both major and minor excursions into the unfamiliar, including efforts to formulate, explore, and test possibilities regarding the design of a learning experience in all of its contextual uniqueness.

      DOI: When compared to Maintanence learning, this is taking the mundane everyday tasks of a job, and going into unexplored territory to find solution and new ways to complete the job at hand.

    2. maintenance learning, refers to becoming familiar with extant knowledge, practices, and tools, such that designers can engage in the same work, in approximately the same manner, as others in the field—for example, using a software program in originally-intended ways for fairly well-understood applications relevant to design.

      DOI: This explains everyday knowledge needed to maintain and complete the same job everyday.

    3. Repurposing conceptual tools may also follow a syncretic pattern, in which they are critically appraised with regard to their potential utility and modified to fit with the rest of a designer’s purposes in a given project.

      Old word and new world come together! Critical Flexibility

    1. Fluent or prolific thinking refers to the thinkers’ ability to generate a multitude of ideas and concepts.

      DOI: Fluent - this refers to a thinkers ability to generate a mulittude of ideas and concepts.

      I feel like I am a fluent thinker, I finally found a word to describe what I have felt all my life. I can generate so many solutions to problems yet many may be far-fetched or unreasonable, but in my mind it is a solution.

      This is great for brainstorming I have realized over my life.

    2. as the generation of numerous original ideas, we recognize that creative thought involves the selection of appropriate ideas to move forward

      DOI: Creativity defined in two ways; 1st as generation of numerous original ideas, and 2nd as the selection from those ideas of appopriate ideas to move forward.

      Really shows true creativity is found in the 2nd definition and is not just about idea generation but the ability to select the best idea of the list to move forward with, this is creativity.

    1. engages the learners and goes beyond their expectations.

      DOI: Creative Instruction - Engages learners and goes above thier expectations.

      Another interesting take on creative instruction. I like that they define it as going "beyond [learner] expectations".

    2. instruction that keeps learners motivated while still meeting the objectives of the instruction.

      DOI: Creative instruction - Motivating instruction that stays on task.

      Great definition that hints at what creative intruction looks like.

  13. Oct 2020
  14. Sep 2020
  15. Aug 2020
    1. It will find there is "very little evidence that the virus is transmitted in schools",

      The reporter interviewed Professor Russel Viner, president of Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health. Apparently, a study was conducted through April to June which collected information of 20,000 students and 100 teachers yet there is no link to this study, did not get peer reviewed or published. It is all just claims at this point. We have no knowledge if these are private schools or public, if there were any safety measures in place, if this included online classes vs in class.

      However, according to CDC and the respected studies it cited, there seems to be lower transmission rates among children and transmission from child to family, but this remains inconclusive. There still needs to be more evidence to be gathered.

  16. Apr 2020
  17. Mar 2020
  18. May 2019
    1. Require DOI?: Set this to true in order to generate a permanent identifier for this collection (Please set this to true for collections related to publications).
  19. Mar 2019
    1. Super cool. The difference between annotating the web, and annotating academic scholarship / science.

  20. Feb 2019
  21. Dec 2018
  22. Nov 2018
  23. Oct 2018
  24. Aug 2018
  25. Jul 2018
  26. Jun 2018
    1. The most up-to-date version of the open-source package NPTFit may be found at https://github.com/bsafdi/NPTFit and the latest documentation at http://nptfit.readthedocs.io. In addition, the version used in this paper has been archived at https://zenodo.org/record/380469#.WN_pSFPyvMV.

      This is an example of incorrect software citation per the AAS Journal's policy. The Zenodo metadata should have been added to the reference list as a 1st class citation.

      It is also an example of an incorrectly typeset URL. URLs that come from DOIs should be typeset using the DOI string not the resolved URL. It should have read, "version used in this paper has been archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.380469"

    2. Foreman-Mackey D., Vousden W., Price-Whelan A. et al 2016 corner.py: corner.py v2.0.0, doi:10.5281/zenodo.53155

      corner.py is one of the more interesting examples of software citations. there are at least 3 different formal references in the wild:

      https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11020 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.53155 https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00024

      with different versions and author lists.

    1. Barbary K. 2014 sncosmo Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.11938

      This software citation losts its version information. We will have to work on our typsetting and production rules, as well as develop formal JATS/NLM XML schema to contain versioning information.

    2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11938

      This DOI software archive is also in the Reference list per our Journal's software policy.

    3. The catalog of fakes used to generate the efficiency grids in Section 3 are available in a persistent directory: doi:10.5258/SOTON/D0030.

      This is the dataset related to this article. It contains reproducibility and reusable data for readers.

      Our "article data" tab is suppose to show this entry, but the article data tab is currently linked to the wrong DOI (the Zenodo one highlighted below).

      We do not yet submit this type of data citation as CrossRef metadata. We are still discussing how data citations should appear and be acknowledged in the text.

  27. Mar 2018
  28. Jan 2018
      • audience consensus: little discussion necessary about whether blogs should have DOIs, concrete implementations needed
      • manual DOI registration possible, but of little use
      • API call better, but integration from blogging software necessary
      • SEO also requires exposing metadata => interests align
      • schema.org/BlogPosting suggested
      • https://blog.datacite.org/ uses JSON-LD
      • https://wordpress.org/plugins/schema/
      • sitemap needed so that indexer can find the posts to then extract metadata
      • beta testers from institutions that already register DOIs welcome
  29. Nov 2017
    1. ADS shares those matches with us via its API, and we use that information to populate DOI and JREF fields on arXiv papers.

      I've always wondered if this were true. I continue to wonder if arXiv uses other sources of eprint-DOI matches to corroborate or append to those from ADS.

    1. if cross-format identifiers like DOIs are used, annotations made in one format