- Aug 2022
- Mar 2022
There are some additional interesting questions here, like: how do you get to the edge quickly? How do you do that across multiple fields? What do you do if the field seems misdirected, like much of psychology?
- How do you get to the edge quickly?
I think this is where literature mapping tools come in handy. With such a tool, you can see how the literature is connected and which papers are closer to the edge of understanding. Some tools on this point include Connected Papers, Inciteful, Scite, Litmaps, and Open Knowledge Maps.
- How do you do that across multiple fields?
I think this requires taking an X-disciplinary approach that teeters on multiple disciplines.
- What do you do if the field seems misdirected, like much of psychology?
Good question. It is hard to re-orient a field unless you can find a good reason (e.g., a crisis) for a paradigm shift. I think Kuhn's writing on [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions(https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/Kuhn.html) may be relevant here.
- Jul 2020
Belli, S., & Alonso, C. V. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemic and Emotional Contagion: Societies facing Collapse [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/gdbw6
- social science
- emotional contagion
- epistemological knowledge mapping
- dominant emotion
- Apr 2020
Nowotny, H. (2020 April 02). Viewpoint: It's time to coordinate the global COVID-19 research effort. Science Business. https://sciencebusiness.net/viewpoint/viewpoint-its-time-coordinate-global-covid-19-research-effort.
- Jan 2019
Value-free language and the possibility of a self-contained discipline make possible both modern sci-ence and that mapping of humanistic inquiry onto a scientific model which has created modern social science as well.
And yet, any mapping of humanistic inquiry onto a scientific model would lead to the creation of incomplete maps, of certain lies. One of those lies? If you can't use the scientific method to come to know something, then that something isn't knowledge/true/truth/fact.