4 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2021
  2. dataforpolicy.org dataforpolicy.org
    Special Track 3 - Data for Policy CIC
    1
    1. jasminehollingworth 07 May 2021

      Special Track 3. (n.d.). Data for Policy CIC. Retrieved 8 March 2021, from https://dataforpolicy.org/data-fof-policy-2021/special-track-3/

      lang:en is:other conference discussion information guidance COVID-19 scientist science understanding virus research pandemic model benefit discourse quality paper publication question issue discourse quality algorithmic mediation epistemic goal
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    dataforpolicy.org/data-fof-policy-2021/special-track-3/
  3. twitter.com twitter.com
    Stephan Lewandowsky on Twitter
    1
    1. jasminehollingworth 07 May 2021

      Stephan Lewandowsky. (2021, March 6). 25 March deadline for submissions to our ‘special track’ https://t.co/qwLxCCSjks at Data for Policy conference, 14-16 September at UCL. Please consider submitting @SciBeh @stefanmherzog @Sander_vdLinden https://t.co/A8KSC1Tkh9 [Tweet]. @STWorg. https://twitter.com/STWorg/status/1368280722709110789

      lang:en is:tweet conference data policy COVID-19 public scientist research information virus understanding communication issue discourse paper discussion
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    twitter.com/STWorg/status/1368280722709110789
  4. Aug 2020
  5. twitter.com twitter.com
    Andrew Althouse on Twitter: "@brnichols8744 @JeremySussman @FinancialGonzo @venkmurthy Many scientists use Twitter to carry on conversations (with varying degrees of formality) about published papers, the good, bad, and ugly. The people in this conversation all do this frequently. None of us are anti-science (cont...)" / Twitter
    1
    1. Marlene_Wulf 18 Aug 2020

      Andrew Althouse on Twitter: “@brnichols8744 @JeremySussman @FinancialGonzo @venkmurthy Many scientists use Twitter to carry on conversations (with varying degrees of formality) about published papers, the good, bad, and ugly. The people in this conversation all do this frequently. None of us are anti-science (cont...)” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1295168734219337738

      is:twitter lang:en Twitter conversation formality paper antiscience discussion published scientific research
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1295168734219337738
  6. Apr 2020
  7. www.mdpi.com www.mdpi.com
    On the Potential of Preprints in Geochemistry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
    1
    1. dasaptaerwin 21 Apr 2020
      European Geosciences Union have already become accustomed to such openness and are posting their work prior to peer-review as a discussion on the Copernicus platform [20].

      • Beberapa platform jurnal seperti yang dirilis oleh EGU memiliki jenis makalah diskusi (discussion paper) yang dirilis begitu makalah dikirimkan ke jurnal. Pada dasarnya ini preprint.

      • Cara-cara seperti ini jarang diadopsi oleh jurnal nasional!

      discussion paper
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3360/htm