Broken citation. Correct citiation is https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315573926

broken link

Broken citation. The correct citation is https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144

There is a typo in the figure. The dates for "During Gezi" should be May 28, 2013 - August 1, 2013.

Further, I am grateful to the following people for telling me about errors and typos in the hardback edition: Nimrod Priell, David Marker, Giannis Kanellopoulos, Hiroki Takikawa, Jun Tsunematsu,Takuto Sakamoto, Shinya Obayashiand the hypothesis user named arnaud.

custommade

American Association for Cancer Research

partial

dominant

Academies of Sciences

recording

There references to these articles did not appear in the hardback print edition. They are all from the same issue of Science: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6324

calls

effort in building

the

about

a project to classify a million galaxies

Move this sentence into the paragraph

it

Advice

difference-in-differences

difference-in-means

difference-in-means

difference-in-differences

researcher

excludability

these

have

pre-treatment information

Olmsted

other

who are

used

the same response propensity

Xbox

Xbox

Xbox

Xbox

Xbox

particularly

encouragement

of the encouragement

denotes

This "inaccessible" should be removed. It is mentioned earlier in the sentence.

Y_i(1) -> Y_i(0)

1 -> 0

have have -> have

need -> needed

lab -> field

employment -> unemployment

are who -> who are

embedded -> enriched

Y -> Y_i

think -> thinking

Equation 10-27 is wrong:

• Resistors are in parallel, their noise does not sum.

This is 3 terms (10 MΩ noise, 100 kΩ noise, and amplifier noise), but the equation only includes 2.

Equation 10-25 has several errors:

• The left and right side are not equal.
• Resistors are in parallel, so their noise does not sum.
• Resistor noise needs to be multiplied by gain to be combined with 113.1 μV output noise of op-amp.

Equation 10-23 is incorrect:

• The noise of the resistors does not sum, since the resistors are in parallel and load each other. It would be equal to a single 50 kΩ resistor producing 4.0 μV.
• The 113.1 value is output noise. The resistor noise needs to be multiplied by the gain to get the output noise, too.

Should be 0.1 μF

Should be 0.1 μF

The noise calculations have many errors. See annotations on https://via.hypothes.is/http://web.mit.edu/6.101/www/reference/op_amps_everyone.pdf for details

actually should be multiplied by the non-inverting noise gain, which is 101

The noise calculations have many errors. See annotations on https://via.hypothes.is/http://web.mit.edu/6.101/www/reference/op_amps_everyone.pdf for details

The catch function is deprecated and when I tried this with ghci 7.10.3 got an error that System.IO.Error does not export catch. The replacement is the catch function in Control.Exception

I initially did not see the difference in the output of B.cons vs B.cons' here, both output a plain string.

I think this is because of the Show typeclass implementation for Data.ByteString.Lazy which is used by ghci when printing values.

If on the other hand I use :force <expr> which fully evaluates <expr> and prints out the resulting structure then I do see the difference.

Broken link, should point to https://hackage.haskell.org/package/bytestring/docs/Data-ByteString-Lazy.html