610 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2018
    1. x3yif and only ifdxù3e y

      Maybe x and y (at least y) should be said to be natural numbers here, but then again it is fairly obvious from the context.

    2. Writedzeforthe smallest natural number greater thanz2R, and writebzcfor the largest naturalnumber smaller thanz2R, e

      I think both of these definitions should include "or equal to", especially given the immediate following example of x <= 3y if and only if ...

    3. s

      Not really a typo, but slightly confusing since s is also used for a different funciton in the same example in the following paragraph.

  2. May 2018
  3. Apr 2018
  4. Mar 2018
  5. Jan 2018
  6. Dec 2017
  7. Nov 2017
  8. Oct 2017
  9. Sep 2017
  10. Aug 2017
  11. Jul 2017
  12. May 2017
  13. Apr 2017
  14. Mar 2017
    1. published will

      published and will

    2. and trasfer

      and transfer

    3. return at

      back to

    4. set the

      sets the

    5. Agend

      Agenda

    6. externatlities

      externality

    7. healtcare

      healthcare

    8. pubic resources

      public ressources - pubic ressources sind was gaaanz anderes ;-)

    9. renats

      rents

      Inhaltlich: vgl. die Anmerkung auf S. 17 zu Big Data-Auswertungen in Berlin, die dort ebenfalls nach den "großen" kleinen gesucht haben.

    10. experimeng

      experiment

    11. it ways

      it in ways

    12. arleady

      already

    13. hegemoncy

      hegemony

    14. need to reformulated

      need to be reformulated

    15. That said, it just so happens that many political forces that do question many parts of the neoliberal agenda to have some influence in c

      That said, many political forces that do question many parts of the neoliberal agenda happen to have some influence in c

    16. themselves

      . [Punkt]

    17. a  popular

      Das muss wohl "app" statt "add" heißen hier.

    18. they  advanced

      they advance

    19. like  neutral

      neural

    20. bsolet

      obsolete

    21. exercises

      exercise

    22. sprang

      sprung

    23. n

      -

    24. a

      -

    25. literary

      literacy (?)

    26. quantity

      quantify

    27. celever

      clever

    28. surrendred

      surrendered

    29. the gtlobe

      the globe

    30. Simens

      Siemens

  15. Feb 2017
    1. there corrletion

      Typo?

      I guess it's "their correlation"

  16. Jan 2017
  17. Dec 2016
  18. Nov 2016
  19. Oct 2016
  20. Sep 2016
  21. Aug 2016
    1. Proper citation and deposition of data generated from their study Proper citation of 3rd party or previously generated data used in their study

      Should be indented.

  22. Jul 2016
    1. (x0;t0)2bdy(dom(f))

      Confirmed that this should be \(bdy(epi(f))\), not \(bdy(dom(f))\)

  23. Jun 2016
  24. May 2016
  25. Apr 2016
    1. req.param('_id')

      Should this be req.param['_id'] ? Or req.param._id ?

    2. id="edit"

      There are two elements with the same id. Was this one supposed to have an id of 'delete'?

  26. Feb 2016
    1. (especially the well-off) are able to stay afloat more easily then poor population
      1. Typo in "... more easily then..." change "then" to "than"

      2. The parentheses in the first part "(especially the well-off)" doesn't match the next lack of parentheses around "poor populations" -- they're both referencing the same subject, and so the logical connection doesn't make sense to me.

      TL;DR: The sentence should still make sense with parentheses removed.

      Test: "Humans are able to stay afloat more easily then poor populations..."

      Does it make sense? Not to my mind (unless you're ironically implying that poor populations are inhuman! maybe a sarcastic remark on those who seem to think/feel that way?).

      Consider changing this to: "Well-off populations of humans are able to stay afloat more easily than poor populations..."

      ... or something else that leaves the connections consistent.

    2. Creeative
  27. Jan 2016
    1. emergence of Force11 ̇OA provides

      Broken sentence, but can't quite figure out what's wrong.

  28. Dec 2015
    1. said on the of the vol-unteers

      should be: 'said one of the'


      • change 'on' to 'one'
      • delete the first instance of 'the'
    2. I guess we’ll see if that’s something other people want too.” At press time, it was to early to tell

      1) TYPO: 'it was to early to tell.': change the first instance of 'to' -> 'too'

      It will then read: 'it was too early to tell.'


      2) Given the close proximity of two instances of 'too' (the first being the last word in the speaker's quotation, the second being our now-corrected typo)... consider replacing one of those instances with some other equivalent.

      The first instance would be easier, but less casual-sounding, to replace; options include:

      • 'also'
      • 'as well'

      The second instance would be a bit trickier; options include:

      • '{As of this writing | At press time}, that's still an open question.'
      • ', it was yet unclear.'
      • ', it was yet unclear what the outcome would be.'
      • ', it wasn't yet clear.'

      .... This said, my immediate thought is that 'it was too early to tell' is an open, receptive/neutral, and -- importantly -- potentially optimistic phrasing. I.e., "We don't know yet! The future could hold anything!"

      That's a much more optimistic outlook, compared to terms like 'unclear' -- that seems murky and potentially doubtful to my mind.

      So I like the way you phrased it initially.

    3. The goal of “Making the world work for everyone” is vague and can be in-terpreted in many ways. I believe that is it’s power.
      • consider whether or not to lower-case the M in "Making." (I should probably ask an experienced copywriter or professional editor, actually... There is probably a "one right answer" in this instance, although I'm not certain.)

      • Change it's to its (that is, remove the apostrophe)

      The possessive form of "it" is an irregular form of possessive in lacking an apostrophe, probably to avoid confusion with the contraction of "it is."

      (This is yet another grammar rule I memorized in public schools. :p)

    4. It is a question; a challenge.

      Strictly speaking, semi-colons are only used to separate clauses which could, on their own (as they stand), each be a grammatically complete sentence. The test? [You'll notice that last remark wasn't a grammatically complete sentence, by the way.]

      Replace the semi-colon with a period; see if it works.

      Replace the semi-colon with a period. See if it works.

      "A challenge" isn't a grammatically complete sentence. Of course, stylistic licenses are sometimes taken to defy the rule of "every clause between two periods must be a complete sentence."

      In this case, though, I'd suggest:

      • adding a repetition of "it is" after the semi-colon (to make it complete-sentence-worthy): 'It is a question; it is a challenge.', OR
      • replacing the semi-colon and substituting a colon in its place. (This also has the advantage, in my mind, of making it a 'stronger' statement: throwing down a challenge.): 'It is a question: a challenge.', OR
      • both: 'It is a question: it is a challenge.'

      Either or both should work. (Personally, I like the second option best: 'It is a question: a challenge.' ) That said, if you prefer it the way it is for style, go for it. It just stuck out in my mind, but I am a fiend for proper (or obsessive) semi-colon usage.

    5. letters,“Those who love peace must learn

      insert a space between the comma and the open-quote.

      NOTE: On the website (html version), the lack of a space is clearly visible.

      (Although visually, in this pdf, it looks like there is a space -- but there actually isn't!! ... It's just how the pdf is rendering on my screen that gives the illusion of a space-character being present. If you try to highlight it, you'll notice there's no extra character between the comma and the quote-mark.)

    6. instead against

      typo: insert "of", as so: "instead of against"

    7. fuelling volunteers

      change to "fueling" (one L).


      • "fuelling": turns out, this is the UK / Commonwealth spelling (with two L's).
      • "fueling": this is the US spelling (with one L). In the US, the word "fuel" -- regardless of any word-form it takes -- always has only one (1) "L."

      side note: I am all in favour of using British or Commonwealth spelling! If so, then it should be consistent across the entire published work (but I didn't think that it was your intent to use British spelling here ;p).

    8. No single person or group is could

      delete the word "is"

    9. underwear.

      Consider removing the period at the end of this list.

      It's a stylistic or slight syntax concern: maintain the existing conventions already in place (no periods at the end of list-items). NB: Other editors might disagree with me in this instance.... IMO, it appears a little more awkward than if it were left out, but that's pretty subjective.

    10. we will send and email

      change 'and' to 'an'

    11. (or if you would be if you knew that at least 1000 people would be out there with you)

      needs a period, AFTER the closing of the parenthesis, like so:

      (or if you would be if you knew that at least 1000 people would be out there with you).

    12. with other spontaneously groups around the world

      change 'spontaneously' to:

      • either 'spontaneous',
      • or 'spontaneously organized' (with or without a hyphen should work)
    13. 24 hour

      insert a hyphen: "24-hour"

      (I'm relatively certain this is the most widely-accepted way of writing it; other interpretations are possible, but I think the hyphen applies here.)

    14. waste a lot of energy telling people “no”.

      change: move the period, so it's inside the quotation mark.


      Placing commas and periods inside dialogue quotation marks is proper syntax/grammar in normal writing. .... It's improper syntax only in technical/computer writing. However, it's possible that -- stylistically -- this may have changed in recent years, as technical (and technology) writers have influenced mainstream writing somewhat.

    15. event,” Said

      change "Said" to lower-case "s"

    16. but 3 is still pretty good.”

      My understanding of strict grammar rules, with regard to writing numbers, is as follows:

      • When writing a number less than ten, one spells the number (and refrains from writing the digits).
      • When writing a number greater than 10, one writes the digits (e.g., 24).

      (Side note: I don't recall what the rule is for the number ten itself!)

      Anyway, that being said: My sense is that in journalistic writing (and in fiction, and in novels), one can take stylistic licenses; it's entirely up to you, based on what style, context and goals you have in mind.

      If it were me, I'd spell it out (but it's your call): "but three is still pretty good."

    1. the set of mothers arises as is the image of
    2. henma1››—Af›—Bb›—nis
    3. For example ifX ta,b,c,d,e,fuandX1 tb,d,euthenX1ÑXand we turn thatinto the functionX—X1given bybfi—b,dfi—d,efi—e

      Flip the X and X' in X -> X'

  29. Nov 2015
    1. only for a 2,000calorie daily diet

      Shouln't there be a space between "2,000", and "calorie"?

  30. Oct 2015
    1. All of these use cases share the a fundamental requirement for a API to find text.

      "share ~the~ a fundamental"

  31. Sep 2015
    1. structure can not be directly reconstructed

      cannot

    2. Müller, Stefan. 2014d. Kernigkeit: Anmerkungen zur Kern-Peripherie-Unterscheidung.In Andreas Nolda, Athina Sioupi & Antonio Machicao y Priemer (eds.),Zwischen kernund peripherie(studia grammatica 76

      ...In Antonio Machicao y Priemer, Andreas Nolda & Athina Sioupi (eds.), Zwischen Kern und Peripherie ;)

    3. X theory,76–162X theory, 80X-Theory,76,77,95,97,98,127,131,153,158,160,169,245,429,498,519,520,528,640,789X Theor

      There are many Index-entries which appears twice or in this case 4 times. It is probably a problem of the scope of \index \index{\textbf{x}} =/= \index{x}

    4. a

      an

    5. If the head is a N,

      an N

    6. the the

      that?

  32. Jul 2015
    1. | case

      These vertical bars do not seem to work for me, in either the regular input mode or ":paste" mode.

  33. Jun 2015
  34. Mar 2015
    1. to beat random search in a carefully-chosen intervals.

      to beat random search in a carefully-chosen intervals.

      remove the "a"?

    2. That is, we are generating a random random with a uniform distribution, but then raising it to the power of 10.

      That is, we are generating a random random with a uniform distribution, but then raising it to the power of 10.

      The word random is repeated?

    3. Tue to the denominator term in the RMSprop update

      True to the denominator term in the RMSprop update

    4. the step decay dropout is slightly

      remove the word dropout?

    5. theoretical converge guarantees

      theoretical convergence guarantees

    6. update has recently

      update that has recently

    7. appears more as a slightly more interpretable

      appears as a slightly more interpretable (remove first more)

    8. sizes of million parameters

      can have sizes in the millions parameters can have millions of parameters

    9. hack the code to remove the data loss contribution.

      Maybe it should be: hack the code to remove the regularization loss contribution.

    1. The final loss for this example is 1.58 for the SVM and 0.452 for the Softmax classifier

      The figure above has a value of 1.04 for the softmax case. I think that should be \(0.452\).

    1. The synapses are not just a single weight a complex non-linear dynamical system

      Typo. Grammar.

      The synapses are not just a single weight ,but a complex non-linear dynamical system

    2. noone

      The usual spelling is "no one" and to a lesser extent "no-one". Just nit-picking. B-)