7 Matching Annotations
- Jul 2021
-
-
During the evaluation phase, learners can ask, How well did I do? What did I learn? Did I get the results I expected? What could I have done differently? Can I apply this way of thinking to other problems or situations? Is there anything I don’t understand—any gaps in my knowledge? Do I need to go back through the task to fill in any gaps in understanding? How might I apply this line of thinking to other problems?
-
- Apr 2021
-
meta.stackexchange.com meta.stackexchange.com
-
We also know people need a good sized group and time to see the impact and value of a platform like Stack Overflow for Teams. Our previous 30 day free trial of our Basic tier wasn’t long enough. Now, Stack Overflow for Teams has a free tier for up to 50 users, forever.
-
- Mar 2021
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Darren Dahly. (2019, September 4). It seems appropriate to do a thread on our recent session about the use of Twitter by statisticians. Https://t.co/eFwLDuXnOU [Tweet]. @statsepi. https://twitter.com/statsepi/status/1169313702715281408
-
- Jul 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Wise, Toby, Giorgia Michelini, Tomislav Damir Zbozinek, Cindy C. Hagan, and Dean Mobbs. ‘Development and Validation of the Avoidance of Respiratory Viral Infection Scale (ARVIS)’, 17 July 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkc7m.
Tags
- fearful
- validity
- psychometric properties
- evaluate
- reliability
- general trait anxiety
- questionnaire
- social distancing
- avoidance
- handwashing
- contagion
- Avoidance of Respiratory Viral Infection Scale
- psychology
- fear
- measures
- daily behaviour
- mental health
- ARVIS
- state anxiety
- depression
Annotators
URL
-
- Jun 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Moreau, David, and Kristina Wiebels. ‘Assessing Change in Intervention Research: The Benefits of Composite Outcomes’, 2 June 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t9hw3.
-
- Dec 2019