DOI: 10.1186/s40478-026-02240-y

Resource: RRID:AB_3711244

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_3711244

What is this?

DOI: 10.1186/s40478-026-02240-y

Resource: (Agilent Cat# Z0334, RRID:AB_10013382)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_10013382

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 3671, RRID:AB_330248)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_330248

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-11012, RRID:AB_2534079)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2534079

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 3629, RRID:AB_2249358)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2249358

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2118, RRID:AB_561053)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_561053

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 13166, RRID:AB_2798136)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2798136

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 93065, RRID:AB_2800199)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2800199

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-11001, RRID:AB_2534069)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2534069

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2500, RRID:AB_10839118)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_10839118

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 6943, RRID:AB_10013641)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_10013641

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2541, RRID:AB_2174466)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2174466

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 3528, RRID:AB_2160882)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2160882

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# V9131, RRID:AB_477629)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_477629

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: RRID:AB_2291558

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2291558

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (BD Biosciences Cat# 610467, RRID:AB_2128060)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2128060

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 8556, RRID:AB_10891442)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_10891442

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 111-035-144, RRID:AB_2307391)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2307391

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 4848, RRID:AB_10694415)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_10694415

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 115-035-068, RRID:AB_2338505)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2338505

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: RRID:AB_3698765

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_3698765

What is this?

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115716

Resource: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# A5979, RRID:AB_476749)

Curator: @scibot

SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_476749

What is this?

qu'est que c'est ?

ref biblio

lesquelles ? ref biblio

lesquels ? ajouter les références bibliographiques

mettre les références bibliographiques complètes

préciser le modèle utilisé

I think "Beyond being there" source is relevent because it shows that online communication is not just a case of copying face-to-face communication. Online tools can also enable people to work together when they are not in the same place. This is similar to crowdsourcing as many people can give an idea or help with a task little by little. I also think this is true today as a lot of online teamwork is done without ever meeting those people in person. It is useful but sometimes at the expense of being personal.

I believe that the GoFundMe source is an example of crowdsourcing because it demonstrates how people can use the internet to ask millions of strangers for help at the same time. Previously, all I thought of when it came to crowdfunding was raising money but after reading this chapter now I can refer to it as a form of crowdsourcing as well. It relies on a large group of people to choose to get involved, even if it is a small amount from them. I also think this is kind of neat because it shows the positive and risky side of websites. It can help people in a true emergency but it also involves trust because the donor will not always know the full story behind a fundraiser.

This article is a good example of ad‑hoc crowdsourcing used in a positive way rather than as harassment or doxxing. A single tweet (“HELP ME FIND THIS COUPLE!”) effectively defines the “problem,” and then thousands of Twitter users collectively solve it by boosting and sharing until the couple surfaces. It shows how social media can turn what would otherwise be a private moment into a kind of public, collaborative project, but in this case the couple consented and appreciated the attention.

I looked at this platform called Patreon. This platform essentially bridges a large gap between creators and users who interact with them via podcasts, social media, etc. I think that this is a form of crowdsourcing because it's a way that creators gain feedback and new ideas of what their fans actually want to see, and it looks like it's through interactive chats and more direct communication.

This article is a really cute story about how a photographer accidentally captured a couples proposal but had no way of getting the photos to them except through Twitter, which worked. I think this was such a cute story and an example of how the internet could get people to band together for a good cause.

Amazon Mechanical Turk is a useful example of planned crowdsourcing because it breaks large projects into small “microtasks,” like data validation, surveys, or content moderation. I think it shows both the power and problem of crowdsourcing: companies gain speed and cheap labor, but workers may feel invisible behind the final product.

The WIRED video was interesting because it showed how people often change their behavior around robots, even when the robot is not very advanced. I thought it was funny but also realistic how people felt awkward or embarrassed interacting with machines in public spaces. I think it connects to topics from this course about how technology shapes human behavior and social interactions. As robots and AI become more common in workplaces and daily life, I think people will slowly start treating them more naturally, similar to how people learn to become comfortable with technological advancements over time.

This article talks about an incident at a hocky match between the Vancouver Canucks and the Seattle Kraken. In the game, Vancouver's assistant equipment manager got a message from a fan sitting behind the team bench telling him that a mole on the back of his neck was cancer. After the game, he got it checked and found that the fan was correct, it was a malignant melanoma that he had removed days later. After this, the Canucks turned to social media to find the woman who discovered the cancer. The original post was retweeted over 8,000 times, and the woman was found within two hours.

First of all, I didn't know that Wikipedia's founder (Jimmy Wales) started his career by linking to internet porn in the 90s. Wikimedia foundation (a non-profit) found that 1 percent of Wikipedia's editors have made 77% of the site's content. Wikipedia is an adhocracy: a stable hierarchy structure which allows for individual mobility The most startlingly thing is that in 2011, 91% of their editors are male and in 2013, 84% were male, a stable decrease, but still overwhelming. This is a struggle for Ai models as AI will use wikipedia for their training data, using date that is geared for western males.

This BBC article notes an unfortunate incident where activity on the site of Reddit, which led to effectively a harassment campaign on those Reddit users believed to responsible for the Boston Bombings. The activity began on the subreddit r/FindBostonBombers, with users attempting to find the perpetuators, leading to several false accusations, harassment of those accused, and eventually a formal apology by the Reddit company itself for the incident.

Otra vez, Quiroga emplea ideas de lo abyecto para cultivar un tono de horror. Para añadir a lo que dije anteriormente, si en tu almohadón, no solo hay parásitos que son "monstruosos" o "viscosos" sino también que comen sangre humana, genera terror en los lectores, y decir que es algo que puede pasar más común que esperas, da una ansiedad a la audiencia. Esta combinación de lo abyecto y un temor de encontrar estas cosas abyectas por su frecuencia causa a los lectores imaginarles en situaciones semejantes a la de Alicia, amplificando el impacto del texto.

Esta frase evoca la teoría de lo abyecto. Encontrar algo "viviente y viscoso" en algo tan personal y cercano al cuerpo como un almohadón, que existe para dejarte relajar y respaldarte, también evoca las ideas que Julio Cortázar explora en "La casa tomada", donde un lugar seguro se vuelve en un espacio hostil.

En tener alucinaciones, Quiroga cultiva una manera aumentada de explorar sentidos de lo siniestro y la idea de que su hogar está convirtiéndose en un espacio que ya no es seguro. Las alucinaciones cambian la manera en que una persona ve el mundo, así creando diferencias entre lo que se puede esperar y lo que se ve. También, de una manera, la persona con alucinaciones puede ser algo siniestro porque no sabe si esta persona está hablando de sus alucinaciones o de algo real, aún puede ser un monstruo porque de esta creación de tensión. Es decir que el uso de alucinaciones complica la situación y el statu quo, por consiguiente, genera tensión y terror.

This draws a connection between crowdsourcing and organized deception online. I appreciate that it distinguishes between “orchestrated,” “cultivated,” and “emergent and self-sustaining” disinformation, because that shows falsehoods do not always come from a single top‑down source. Platforms can unintentionally provide ideal conditions for users to collaboratively create and amplify misleading narratives. This really complicates the idea of the “wisdom of crowds,” since the same collective processes that can solve problems can also generate and legitimize inaccurate or harmful information.

I think this example shows how dangerous online crowdsourcing can become when people act too quickly. Even though the Reddit users thought they were helping, they ended up hurting an innocent family. This reminds me that information on social media spreads very fast, and people do not always stop to check if it is actually true before sharing it.

I think the section about power users and lurkers is interesting because it shows that “the crowd” is not always equal. A small group often does most of the work, while many people only watch or benefit from it. This makes me wonder whether crowdsourcing really represents everyone’s voice, or mostly the loudest users.

This reminds me of a lot of true crime videos that I have watched where many of the cases were actually cracked by people on the internet. One that I can think of actually has a Netflix documentary called Don't F With Cats, where the internet identified and caught a loser who was killing cats on video and uploading them.

There were some positives in the article of how Reddit helped organize even animal support for victims, but It's insane the personal harassment this innocent person and his family faced. That trauma can't be stopped by a single apology. Just think about how horrible that would be to experience as someone with no idea what's going on.

I think archiving messages can be both helpful and stressful. Sometimes it is useful because people can go back and check important information in chats or emails. But at the same time, it also makes people more careful about what they say online because messages can stay forever. I noticed that in group chats or social media, people sometimes misunderstand old messages and start arguments again.

This paper is already published in a peer reviewed journal

Mitra N, Dey S (2022), "Understanding the catalytic abilities of class IV sirtuin OsSRT1 and its linkage to the DNA repair system under stress conditions" Plant Science ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111398

Please provide the link here so that it can be properly cited.

This paper is already published.

Khan S, Mitra N, Dey S (2022), " CobB like sirtuin in Oryza sativa indica regulates the mitochondrial machinery under stress conditions" Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2022.109446

Please add the link here so that it can be properly cited.

This article is recently published in Roy AK, Khan S, Dey S (2026) "Assessing the selectivity of lysine negatively charged acyl modifications by OsCobB and its link with different stress conditions in plants", Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics; https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2026.2660218

Please add the link so that the paper can be cited properly. Thank you.

How do you sell an insurance policy to customers? Find best practices to promote your insurance policies and build a strong customer relationship that later increases your sales.

Know More: https://callyzer.co/blog/how-to-sell-an-insurance-policy-to-customers-a-comprehensive-guide/

I think this is where I see students/teacher needing to work - how to and receive constructive criticism to grow on both sides.

I think this is true in education - you have to go into any class with the belief that you have something to learn or you won't. If you walk into a class feeling that you already know it or that the teacher has nothing to offer you, you won't learn. A humble student knows they have much to learn. But the same is also true of the teacher - they need to make sure they realize they have things to learn as well as that symbiotic relationship can be magic.

How could you turn this into something that you could practice in class? I think of things like "good things" in primary school, but could this also be done at a college level without students shrugging it off?

I think this also is crucial for students with bad experiences in education - they need to forgive the educator that they feel wronged them or they can't often move on and focus on learning new material as they continually just feel bad about it.

This can be very helpful to students - not what they are bad at, but what they are good at. The difference between you got 2 wrong rather than 18 right.

I think this can be very helpful with students - seeing their strengths. The focus not on what they are bad at, but what they are good at and how to enhance that.

I think that one way I have participated in crowdsourcing online is by voting in companies polls via instagram. Sometimes if I see a company that I like or shop from posting ideas of new flavors, products, etc, I will vote in a poll to try and get my input into the production of something new. I feel like this is a prime example of crowdsourcing because they get a ton of responses and use that to source data from their crowd and participants.

I believe that a social media platform shouldn't have different responsibilities for crowd actions than for individual actions. This would mean that the platform should not allow individuals to spread harmful or hateful information, which would prevent groups from doing the same.

I use Reddit quite often, essentially a bunch of different forum sites rolled into one website. There, often, people often post questions to the wider community in hopes of getting an answer (I often do this myself), and I have often answered such queries.

A collection of useful AI tools and Roblox game guides:

AI Tools: - OpenAI Tools Hub - Comprehensive AI tools directory and comparisons - LRTS Trading Tools - AI-powered stock analysis tools

Roblox Game Guides: - Nuke for Brainrot - Game mechanics research - Slime RNG Guide - Drop rate analysis - Brawl RNG - Pull rate statistics - Bedwars Roblox - Strategy guides - Mini War Roblox - Unit guides - Maple Hospital Roblox - Role guides

https://web.archive.org/web/20190918194200/https://polanyisociety.org/2019pprs/Lajos&Goodman-Augmenting-Tacit-Awareness-6-16-19.pdf

originally shared at https://polanyisociety.org/2019pprs/Lajos&Goodman-Augmenting-Tacit-Awareness-6-16-19.pdf

includes list of respective link functions. page 362.

crucial

I thought the section about power users and lurkers was interesting because it shows how much online spaces are shaped by a very small group of people. Even though social media feels like everyone is contributing equally, most users are actually just watching rather than posting. I also think this helps explain why certain opinions or trends online can feel much bigger than they actually are in real life. Sometimes the loudest voices online are just the most active users, not necessarily the majority.

DM INFO: Modify as 2024 rules give them more HP than 5. does so send out four groups of 5

the druid and three needle blights were drawn outside. two remain be hind the wine racks

PC INFO: Something moves behind the eastern wine rack. Through the holes, you glimpse two humanoid figures.

I believe the Chinese (or more cultures, I'm unsure) leave things made out of paper for the deceased. Such as paper iphones, paper cars, paper stacks of money. I knew it was because they were "providing" for the deceased but didn't know that the deceased depended on them. Also, contrasts other religions in which in death we leave all material posessions as we don't need them anymore.

Obligate kinship

Kinship out of desire

The concept of filial piety being complex and nuanced gets watered down by these assumptions.

Reenforces that obligate filial piety can be emotionally, and physically, draining.

The correlation between this belief and the feeling of filial piety carried by caretakers might be correlated.

I wonder if outside of family filial piety cultivates a reciprocal feeling of familial bonds because of the value of filial piety or is it just a human nature thing to become close to those we spend a lot of time with. Family in a social context seems to be ever-growing as well.

I think that this concept is extremely understandable but I don't know why. I feel as if many people like when others do things for them "just because." Perhaps it shows a connection between individuals?

This isn't true at all

We're not going to be able to blanket 1 phrase to cover both Pulse and Rendezvoo, we'll need to split these out. We are definitely not the operating system for OEMs and Dealers, and I'm not sure it's clear enough to say it for farms, no body is looking for an operating system, and I'd like to use something that is easily applied outside of Ag.

Esta frase me causó pensar en el rol de la religión en este cuento, con el Diablo como lo más injusto y Dios como un modelo de lo virtuoso. La idea de que el monje pensó que quizás estas personas son víctimas de algo fuera de su control, otra vez, me causó pensar en el horror/terror religioso. En este contexto, el Diablo quizás tiene el poder de juzgar, castigar y controlar a estas personas en su búsqueda.

Algo que llamó la atención fueron los materiales que forman los cuerpos de los fantasmas. No son cosas que causan reacciones innatas de horror, en realidad, "luz" genera el efecto opuesto. También la luz me recuerda imágenes divinas, especialmente en relación con la muerte, la frase "sigue la luz", por ejemplo, combina la luz con la idea del cielo cristiano. Por eso, opino que la composición de los fantasmas es influida por temas del horror, terror y temor religioso.

Con esta frase, Calcaño presage la conexión que Ubaldo tiene con la muerte. Por añadidura, la yuxtaposición de la muerte y el nacimiento me causa pensar en lo siniestro, especialmente con la idea de que los espíritus se quedan en nuestro mundo después de morir que este cuento explora. Los espíritus, por sus apariencias humanas y falta de cuerpo físico, crea una inquietud porque no deben estar con nosotros, sino en la próxima vida.

OF shill.

Consider: is this more about fit-for-purpose equipment vs. pharma-grade-- the former could also include CM-specific B2B offerings.

because it is not scientifically backed up by social psychology, social psychology actually tends to disagree with the mbti theory

his ideas were based on argumentation and anecdotal observation rather than empirical evidence, Sperber (2010) suggested that there is the existence of a "guru effect" where people assume statements from authority figures have truth

Maybe this could be removed. It doesn't fit under epidemiology.

We could include more data under epidemiology: 1. Rate of New Cases and Deaths per 100,000 - this is line graph 2. Percent of Cases by Stage 3. Year Relative Survival by Stage at Diagnosis - two graphs here 4. Percent of New Cases by Age Group

You can find the above data at https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/

1. Regional differences - some cancer types have regional differences (e.g. Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma is mostly commin in East Asia)

Looks like the de Mul citation is not linked, just the doi:

De Mul N, de Jong V, Cremer O ... Practical guidance for validating the predictive performance in the presence of missing data: a guide for the clinical researcher Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2026; 192

sample size should be not smaller than 20000 before applying split-based strategy

calculate relative explained variance; see also proportion of chisq for each predictor.

351

76

The term is too broad and not clearly explained.

The branding may give consumers the impression that all products are sustainable.

This may confuse consumers and create false environmental claims.

The campaign may exaggerate sustainability efforts for marketing purposes.

No clear proof or explanation.

the language barrier is a factor that affects the transition

this insinuates that international students may feel better when they feel more integrated with the home culture they are in

1. Serbest Nakit Akışı hesaplarken bak.[(http://example.com/insert-your-link-here)

feels great to be a indigenous person of earth ( ethnic studies the critical study of indigenous black people . )

12 education system , has grown substatially in 2026

while navigating challenges were mirrored in the classroom

classrooms inspired my peers and myself to advocate for justice

wow that's great to add ethnic studies . What would you have added ? A great introduction to students .

within our communities historical moments have happend .

wow ethnic studies acts as a superhero, cant wait till the update to the alphabet. Knowing that blacks created the alphabet .

A diagram describing the hypothesis would be appropriate during the discussion.

Ethnic studies is a requirement for California state university's

according to Bishal it's not a pretense, it's rather that the circumstances that came up for Macbeth won't come up

Or rather, it's making the point that virtue only comes up from circumstance.

Judy Dench delivers this line in a sad way. She's saying that the ambition of Macbeth becoming king is so strong, that if she had it she would be forced by it to murder her babe.

banger line

• The Risk of Skill Erosion: The author highlights the danger of automation leading to an engineering skill deficit. Similar to how ORMs or Garbage Collection can distance developers from underlying SQL or memory management, over-relying on AI agents risks creating developers who cannot debug or evaluate AI-generated production code.
• The "Remote Work" Parallel: Drawing an analogy to post-COVID remote work, senior engineers can currently leverage AI effectively because they already possess pre-existing, co-located-style foundational engineering skills. The true challenge lies in how newcomers will develop these baseline skills in an AI-first environment.
• Dual-Track Approach to Coding:
  • Vibe Coding (Internal/Prototypes): For internal productivity tools, quick local prototypes, and automation scripting (e.g., audio manipulation with ffmpeg), the author embraces complete AI delegation, ignoring code quality entirely.
  • Production Engineering: Every single line of AI code shipped to production is reviewed 100%. The author actively aims to write code manually roughly 50% of the time using traditional text editors to maintain sharp, fundamental skills.
• Strategic Leverage of Claude Code:
  • Planning: The author drafts structural plans independently first, then compares them against Claude's suggestions to ensure critical thinking isn't outsourced.
  • Omega Messes: Claude Code is intentionally deployed to write highly isolated, heavily tested components (referred to as Sandi Metz's "Omega Messes") to maximize speed without polluting core architectural layers.
• Reallocating Saved Time: Instead of using a 5x velocity boost to hyper-focus on building a frenzy of unneeded features (which ultimately increases stress and decreases user value), the saved time is strategically spent on deliberate breaks, deep architectural thinking, and vetting the actual product utility.
• Real-World Case Study (Shadow Boxing App): The author details migrating a 5-year-old app from Apple's legacy Speech Synthesis framework to an MP3-based ElevenLabs API approach:
  • Vibe Coded the batch audio processors, silence-removers, and config verification tools.
  • Manually Coded the initial core legacy API refactoring and the user interface layout.
  • Delegated to Claude the tedious edge-case handling for the stateful AudioManager (managing Bluetooth latencies, AirPlay interruptions, Siri, and incoming phone calls).

Link is dead, but the original is available here as "24-dynamite.pdf"

• AI operates on statistical patterns, not semantic understanding: Modern AI systems function as pattern-matching engines trained on historical data. They don't understand context or meaning the way humans do, meaning they cannot organically distinguish fact from fiction.
• AI is inherently non-deterministic and probabilistic: Unlike traditional software which is deterministic (Input X always equals Output Y), AI is probabilistic (Input X yields Output Y with a confidence level of Z). The same input can produce different outputs every time.
• Errors, bias, and hallucinations cannot be entirely eliminated: Because AI reproduces historical data patterns and hallucinates plausible-sounding fabrications, errors are a native feature rather than a fixable bug. Improving accuracy comes with exponential costs in data, fine-tuning, and human review.
• Risk tolerance and governance are strategic decisions: Because AI errors are inevitable, executives must determine what error rate their specific business use case can tolerate. Compliance and governance are becoming mandatory as frameworks like Article 4 of the EU AI Act demand demonstrable oversight and sufficient AI literacy among personnel.
• Data integration is essential but insufficient on its own: Clean, structured, and accessible data is required for AI to work at all. However, long-term competitive advantage relies on intentional design and proprietary data layers (such as semantic layers) rather than just connecting to third-party models.
• True business advantage lies in the application and organizational layer: Redesigning operational workflows, changing the business operating model, and integrating AI into daily operations dictate where the real value and step-change productivity gains are realized.
• Human-in-the-loop collaboration outperforms full automation: While AI can boost individual productivity on specific tasks by 30–50%, the most robust results come from human-AI partnerships (diagnostic complementarity) where humans catch errors and AI scales expertise.

1. Treat managing up as a true partnership: Proactively adapt to and embrace collaboration with your manager rather than remaining passive or treating the relationship as a purely top-down power dynamic.
2. Lead with the punchline: Reverse traditional storytelling by stating your conclusion, headline, or recommendation first, ensuring busy executives know exactly why they should care right away.
3. Show your thinking process: Map out the logical steps and considerations behind your conclusions so your manager can easily follow and trust your rationale.
4. Flag potential risks early: Surface issues or roadblocks before they escalate into an immediate crisis, giving your manager time to help course-correct.
5. Bring solutions, not complaints: When presenting a problem, always pair it with actionable solutions or structured options rather than simply unloading the issue onto your manager.
6. Prioritize the information you share: Filter out noise and organize updates by importance to significantly reduce the cognitive load on your manager.
7. Keep your manager loop-aware: Provide consistent, predictable updates so your manager is never left in the dark or caught off-guard by external inquiries.
8. Differentiate micromanagement from under-communication: Evaluate whether a manager's constant hovering is actually due to your own lack of proactive communication and visibility.
9. Over-communication is often the baseline: What feels like "too much" communication to you is frequently just the right amount of context and security required by a busy leader.
10. Proactively suggest next steps: Take immediate ownership of your workflow by mapping out and presenting the logical follow-up actions yourself.
11. State assertions and opinions, don’t just ask questions: Move away from open-ended questions and instead state clear recommendations, backing them up with data or reasoned perspectives.
12. Anticipate your manager’s questions: Pre-emptively think through the pushback, blind spots, or clarifying details your manager will likely ask about, and address them upfront.
13. Adapt strictly to their preferred communication channels: Match your manager’s style—whether they prefer quick Slack updates, structured formal documents, or async deep dives.
14. Build trust before you actually need it: Consistently deliver on small commitments over time to establish a reliable track record, securing autonomy and leeway for future high-stakes initiatives.
15. Be direct and honest with feedback: When explicitly asked for your opinion or critique, respect the trust given to you by offering specific, actionable, and psychologically safe feedback.

The ZOE Daily30+ trial is interesting, but its claims should be interpreted narrowly.

The study shows that a fixed high-fibre, plant-based prebiotic blend can shift gut microbiome composition over six weeks in healthy adults. It also reports improvements in some subjective outcomes, including gut symptoms, hunger, satiety, energy and anxiousness. However, the trial does not establish that the supplement produces meaningful clinical benefit, nor that it is superior to a well-designed dietary intervention.

The main limitation is the comparator. Daily30+ was compared with bread croutons and a single-strain probiotic, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG. That is not a strong ecological comparison. A 30-plant fibre/polyphenol blend is metabolically and ecologically much broader than one probiotic strain. It is therefore unsurprising that it produced broader microbiome shifts.

A more meaningful trial would compare Daily30+ against Mediterranean-diet advice, a diverse whole-food high-fibre intervention, or a broad-spectrum probiotic combined with the same dietary guidance. Without that, the trial cannot answer the practical question: does this supplement add anything important beyond eating a diverse Mediterranean-style diet?

The diversity findings also need careful interpretation. The intervention appears to shift the microbiome toward species ZOE classifies as favourable and away from species it classifies as unfavourable. But that is not the same as showing improved alpha diversity. In fact, the paper reports only limited alpha-diversity improvement, and observed richness decreased in the prebiotic arm. This suggests ecological steering, not simple enrichment.

There is also a broader immunological concern. Daily30+ is an invariant ecological input applied across diverse hosts. A Mediterranean dietary pattern preserves variability: different plants, fibres, polyphenols, fermented foods, oils, fish, regional traditions and individual choices. A fixed supplement applies the same selective pressure across people with different HLA backgrounds, immune histories, inflammatory states and microbiome equilibria.

That matters because host–microbiome interactions are not purely metabolic. They are immunological. The same microbial or metabolite shift may be beneficial in one host but provocative in another, especially where HLA-associated antigen presentation or autoimmune susceptibility is relevant.

The trial does not resolve this. It was short, conducted in healthy adults, and not designed to test autoimmune safety, inflammatory subgroups, HLA-defined risk, or long-term ecological consequences.

So the strongest interpretation is modest: Daily30+ can alter the microbiome and may improve some self-reported gut and satiety-related symptoms over six weeks. But the trial does not show superiority over Mediterranean-style eating, does not prove broad clinical benefit, and does not address whether imposing a fixed ecological pressure is appropriate across immunogenetically diverse populations.

From a pragmatic public-health perspective, the cheaper and better-supported advice remains: eat a diverse Mediterranean-style diet rich in whole plants, fibre, legumes, nuts, olive oil, fish and minimally processed foods.

Prior on the Intercepts: depend on number of levels; automatically estimated by the function.

• Overwhelming Systemic Complexity: The author feels crushed by a hyper-complex world characterized by incomprehensible technology, rigid urban zoning, and top-down laws beyond ordinary citizen control.
• The Cost of Abstraction: Modern life is lived in an abstract, compressed environment that inflicts continuous, unconscious physical and mental stress (e.g., clenched jaws, shallow breathing, persistent confusion).
• The AGI Illusion: While the tech industry presents Advanced General Intelligence (AGI) as a ultimate savior for human issues, the author notes that society often convinces itself of noble intentions while actually engineering deeper cycles of manipulation and destruction.
• The Desire to Disconnect: There is a raw, instinctual urge to destroy devices and completely abandon modern societal obligations, even though acting on these impulses risks being labeled an isolated lunatic.
• Radical Simplification: The initial essay suggests that humanity's greatest gift to itself and the planet might be "to do as little as possible"—relying on primitive intuition and simply appreciating nature (birds, wind, water) and core human emotions.
• Re-evaluation and Engagement: In a post-script written after watching Adam Curtis' Hypernormalisation, the author acknowledges their original thoughts as somewhat naive. They conclude that simply retreating into an imagined simple past is dangerous and renders an individual powerless; instead, one must strive to critically understand the world's complexities to gain the knowledge and leverage necessary to effect real change and alleviate human suffering.

Hacker News Discussion

• The Reality of Engineering: Some commenters suggest the essay reads like an engineer or software professional waking up to the reality that the world possesses far more multi-faceted complexity than any one person can ever master in a lifetime.
• Alienation and Abstract Labor: Many users attribute this feeling of overwhelm to white-collar remote work. Unlike immediate, local trades (e.g., cooking, baking, bike repair) where tasks start and finish quickly for real people, modern abstract corporate loops remain open for months or years, fostering a deep sense of Marxian "alienation" and lack of control.
• Shrinking the Circle of Concern: It is argued that technological societies are inherently engineered to perpetually increase in complexity. The only way to make life manageable is to artificially minimize one's own "world" by prioritizing local communities and immediate surroundings rather than trying to fix or process the whole globe.
• Systemic Traps and "Moloch": Commenters note that the "we" who built this complexity is a vast, hyper-connected collective stretching across generations. This web is so intricate that even good intentions backfire, with some comparing the unstoppable march of systemic complexity to "entropy" or the coordination failure concept of Moloch.
• The Morality of Doing Nothing: The author's idea of "doing as little as possible" sparked a debate on systemic impact. Commenters point out that for employees at toxic corporations (e.g., Meta or Philip Morris), staying home and doing nothing is indeed a net moral good; however, for essential roles like teachers and nurses, passive withdrawal harms society.

même remarque que pour le titre : on se limite donc au texte ? Cela me semble un peu réducteur, dans la mesure où de nombreux corpus sont plurimédiatiques : ce qui pose justement de nombreux défis et engage un gros travail de bricolage !

Il est peut-être un peu dommage de se limiter à l'édition savante. Ou alors, il faudrait ouvrir explicitement à plusieurs médias : il serait important d'inclure par exemple les outils d'annotation vidéo. L'édition est souvent comprise comme édition de texte, ce qui peut réduire le périmètre du dossier et freiner des contributeurs potentiels.

This specific data point reveals a massive gap between marketing claims and actual performance. In advertising ethics, this constitutes deceptive communication, leading to severe legal risks and loss of brand integrity.

Detection by a regulatory body like the EPA demonstrates the legal consequences of making unsubstantiated claims. It underscores the importance of third-party verification in ethical environmental marketing.

This indicates symbolic communication where the company prioritized "looking green" during inspections over actual environmental accountability, a core issue in modern corporate ethics.

The use of a "defeat device" highlights a major ethical failure in communication strategy. It shows that the sustainability messaging was not an operational improvement but a calculated effort to manipulate regulatory data and consumer trust

This is such an unfortunate statistic. We are noticing nowadays the severity in inflation that has made the prices of housing, groceries, gas, etc. all excessively expensive. People are having hard times affording basic life needs which is not okay. There is ongoing increase in the amount of individuals living in poverty which has yet to be addressed efficiently. As the prices of things go up, we notice that pay and assistance from the states are not meeting people at a common ground. When a person is making less than it cost to live, there is a problem. These issues only promote further health challenges like being able to afford medications, appointments/check ups, etc. People are unable to take care of themselves sufficiently which is a huge issue.

Access to safe transportation is huge in implementing healthier behaviors for aging individuals. For hose who require advanced modes of transportation or help from another individual to get them to their appointments, public transit is essential. Some states even organize transportation groups that are designed to help older individuals who may be disabled or need the assistance. Access to such transportation allows people to stay on top of their own health and be able to make their appointments adn continue care with providers. For those who aim to maintain their independence as long as they can, public transportation is a great way to do so. Even if they cannot drive themselves they still have options to keep mobility.

There are so many limiting factors to healthcare that we are noticing in todays society. Medicare is a widely used form of insurance provided through the government for lower income individuals, yet it does not provide access to all possible needs. Many are limited to the type of care they receive solely based on what organizations accept Medicare. Many offices choose to not work with this program so that they can make more profit. It is a sad reality that even aging individuals who need the extra help for possible health conditions are limited to what they can recieve and afford.

Using self-certified branding terms like "Conscious Collection" and "eco smarter materials" creates immense legal and regulatory liabilities today. In recent years, European watchdogs (such as the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets - ACM and the UK Competition and Markets Authority - CMA) cracked down heavily on H&M for exactly this type of vague language. Regulators ruled that calling lines "Conscious" without giving strict, clear metrics explaining why a garment is sustainable constitutes a deceptive marketing practice. H&M was legally forced to remove these exact "Conscious" tags globally and face class-action lawsuits (like Lizama v. H&M) for misleading consumers.

This excerpt exposes the core ethical contradiction of the fast-fashion business model. True environmental sustainability requires a drastic reduction in total production volumes and consumer overconsumption. By celebrating "continuous collections" that feature at "different times" alongside previous collections, H&M relies on a rapid-turnover business model that actively encourages consumers to continuously buy and discard clothing. The ethical issue here is structural: a brand cannot produce billions of garments a year and call itself sustainable, as the sheer scale of overproduction completely cancels out any minor material-sourcing benefits.

The terms "environmentally-adapted" and "greener materials" are textbook examples of unqualified environmental claims. Under modern marketing guidelines (like the US Federal Trade Commission's Green Guides), a brand cannot use generalized "eco-friendly" buzzwords without immediately providing highly specific, scientifically verifiable data right next to the claim. Labeling an entire collection as "greener" without clear, baseline comparative data creates a deceptive "green halo effect" meant to influence consumer perception rather than provide true environmental transparency.

This statement utilizes misleading language by framing the use of PET plastic bottles as a sustainable, closed-loop innovation. In textile science, converting plastic bottles into polyester clothing is a linear path, not a circular economy. While a plastic bottle can be recycled back into a bottle multiple times within a closed loop, once it is melted down and spun into a fast-fashion garment blend, it can almost never be recycled again. H&M's wording misleads consumers into thinking they are supporting a sustainable ecosystem, when they are actually fast-tracking single-use plastic bottles to a landfill.

The term "Conscious Collection" refers to moral and biologically conscious consumption. Promoting regular fashion consumption, however, can go against environmental principles.

These claims may carry legal risk if they are not supported by verified environmental data or lifecycle assessments.

This raises ethical concerns because Starbucks shifts part of the environmental responsibility to customers by encouraging them to bring personal cups. While this promotes awareness, it may also create pressure on consumers instead of fully addressing waste reduction at production level.

The term “sustainable” is vague and not supported with clear measurable environmental evidence, which may mislead consumers.

This may be considered greenwashing because the company still produces large amounts of single-use packaging and waste despite promoting sustainability.

The campaign shifts environmental responsibility toward consumers, while large corporations also contribute significantly to plastic pollution through mass production.

The phrase “meaningful progress” is vague and subjective. The company does not clearly provide measurable evidence about the overall environmental impact reduction.

The advertisement emphasizes environmental benefits but does not fully explain the total amount of plastic Coca-Cola continues to produce worldwide. This may present selective information to consumers.

This slogan creates a strong environmentally friendly image, but critics argue that Coca-Cola still produces massive amounts of plastic packaging globally. The campaign may overemphasize sustainability achievements.

The company promotes a sustainable circular economy image, but Coca-Cola remains one of the world’s largest plastic polluters. This may create concerns about whether the environmental impact is truly reduced.

This statement may be misleading because the bottle caps and labels are excluded from the recycled material. Consumers may assume the entire bottle is fully recycled, which could create confusion.

Très bon article, mais le site est assez illisible : la police est horrible à lire, le panneau d’annotation est vraiment mal fichu.

Pas mieux, c'est l'argument Electrolyte d'Idiocracy dans toute sa splendeur. J'ai exactement ce cas dans mon entreprise ou la direction veut absolument foutre de l'iA partout dans le produit alors que celui-ci s'adresse à une population qui ne veut pas interagir avec l'informatique....

Là, rien à ajouter. Ce concept fumeux d’intelligence artificielle générale est complètement pseudo scientifique, et pour cette raison et plein d'autres, complètement inatteignable. Ce concept n'existe que pour maintenir le rythme des levées de fonds.

Oui et non : oui, l'utilisation d'un LLM est dramatiquement mauvais énergétiquement parlant pour récupérer des informations dans un corpus de texte. Mais d'un autre coté, qu'est ce que c'est facile (encore une fois, on ferme les yeux sur le coup environnemental) !! On fait avaler la documentation de dizaines d'années d’ancienneté d'une entreprise à un LLM et celui-ci est capable de nous répondre en langage naturel, avec un aplomb impressionnant : quelqu'un qui ne connais pas les grande ligne de cette documentation ne le remettra jamais en question. Par ailleurs, former au Sparql, non, ça n'est pas une solution 1) il faudrait que la connaissance soit structuré correctement en amont, or d’expérience, ça n'est jamais le cas et 2) le coût de formation pour l'ensemble des usager serait terrible (à moins de l'intégrer dans un cursus scolaire mais c'est un autre débat)

Moyennement d'accord : les LLM, notament ceux orienté code sont assez bluffant par leur capacités à ganéré des pages et des pages de codes de très bonne qualité en un temps record. Oui, un humain aurait pu faire de même, mais le temps de réalisation aurait été bien plus long et pour une qualité plus ou moins équivalente. Reste cependant la question de l'énergie dépensée. Je fais actuellement tourné un petit serveur linux avec un llama.cpp donc j'ai une assez bonne idée de la quantité d'énergie électrique nécéssaire : c'est assez gargantueque, peu importe les optimisations que je peux mettre dans ma configuration

Complètement d'accord : j'ai appris les bases de la conception d'un réseau de neurones multi couche en 2014 pendant mes études, et depuis, rien à évoluer : au mieux, on a eu des optimisations des algorithmes (MoE, optimisation du cache clef-valeur, etc.)

This section identifies severe legal and regulatory risks in advertising. Under frameworks like the US Green Guides and the UK Green Claims Code, brands making unsubstantiated or false ecological statements face strict legal enforcement, consumer fraud lawsuits, and massive financial penalties for deceptive marketing.

Serious ethical violations occur when a structural gap exists between a fashion brand's green rhetoric and its actual operational practices (decoupling). Resorting to greenwashing tools while advertising high CSR standards highlights corporate dishonesty, misleads public perception, and erodes consumer green trust.

The use of broad, buzzword-heavy environmental terms like "eco-" or "sustainable" without standardized definitions or transparent supply chain data is a clear manifestation of linguistic vagueness. This advertising strategy deliberately exploits positive consumer associations to fabricate a green image while omitting actual product footprints.

Marketing recycled plastic bottles (PET) as a definitive step toward "sustainable fashion" is highly misleading. This practice functions as a sustainability decoy that obscures the larger environmental harm of fast fashion, completely ignoring the industry's failure to implement genuine, circular fiber-to-fiber recycling.

SUM-100 AÇÃO RESCISÓRIA. DECADÊNCIA (incorporadas as Orientações Jurisprudenciais nºs 13, 16, 79, 102, 104, 122 e 145 da SBDI-II) - Res. 137/2005, DJ 22, 23 e 24.08.2005 - I - O prazo de decadência, na ação rescisória, conta-se do dia imediatamente subseqüente ao trânsito em julgado da última decisão proferida na causa, seja de mérito ou não. (ex-Súmula nº 100 - alterada pe-la Res. 109/2001, DJ 20.04.2001) - II - Havendo recurso parcial no processo principal, o trânsito em julgado dá-se em momentos e em tribunais diferentes, contando-se o prazo decadencial para a ação rescisória do trânsito em julgado de cada decisão, salvo se o recurso tratar de preliminar ou prejudicial que possa tornar insubsistente a decisão recorrida, hipótese em que flui a decadência a partir do trânsito em julgado da decisão que julgar o recurso parcial. (ex-Súmula nº 100 - alterada pela Res. 109/2001, DJ 20.04.2001) - III - Salvo se houver dúvida razoável, a interposição de recurso intempestivo ou a interposição de recurso incabível não protrai o termo inicial do prazo decadencial. (ex-Súmula nº 100 - alterada pela Res. 109/2001, DJ 20.04.2001) - IV - O juízo rescindente não está adstrito à certidão de trânsito em julgado juntada com a ação rescisória, podendo formar sua convicção através de outros elementos dos autos quanto à antecipação ou postergação do "dies a quo" do prazo decadencial. (ex-OJ nº 102 da SBDI-II - DJ 29.04.2003) - V - O acordo homologado judicialmente tem força de decisão irrecorrível, na forma do art. 831 da CLT. Assim sendo, o termo conciliatório transita em julgado na data da sua homologação judicial. (ex-OJ nº 104 da SBDI-II - DJ 29.04.2003) - VI - Na hipótese de colusão das partes, o prazo decadencial da ação rescisória somente começa a fluir para o Ministério Público, que não interveio no processo principal, a partir do momento em que tem ciência da fraude. (ex-OJ nº 122 da SBDI-II - DJ 11.08.2003) - VII - Não ofende o princípio do duplo grau de jurisdição a decisão do TST que, após afastar a decadência em sede de recurso ordinário, aprecia desde logo a lide, se a causa versar questão exclusivamente de direito e estiver em condições de imediato julgamento. (ex-OJ nº 79 da SBDI-II - inserida em 13.03.2002) - VIII - A exceção de incompetência, ainda que oposta no prazo recursal, sem ter sido aviado o recurso próprio, não tem o condão de afastar a consumação da coisa julgada e, assim, postergar o termo inicial do prazo decadencial para a ação rescisória. (ex-OJ nº 16 da SBDI-II - inserida em 20.09.2000) - IX - Prorroga-se até o primeiro dia útil, imediatamente subseqüente, o prazo decadencial para ajuizamento de ação rescisória quando expira em férias forenses, feriados, finais de semana ou em dia em que não houver expediente forense. Aplicação do art. 775 da CLT. (ex-OJ nº 13 da SBDI-II - inserida em 20.09.2000) - X - Conta-se o prazo decadencial da ação rescisória, após o decurso do prazo legal previsto para a interposição do recurso extraordinário, apenas quando esgotadas todas as vias recursais ordinárias. (ex-OJ nº 145 da SBDI-II - DJ 10.11.2004)

OJ-SDI2-21 AÇÃO RESCISÓRIA. DUPLO GRAU DE JURIS-DIÇÃO. TRÂNSITO EM JULGADO. INOBSERVÂNCIA. DE-CRETO-LEI Nº 779/69, ART. 1º, V. INCABÍVEL (nova reda-ção) - DJ 22.08.2005 - É incabível ação rescisória para a desconstituição de sentença não transitada em julgado porque ainda não submetida ao necessário duplo grau de jurisdição, na forma do Decreto-Lei nº 779/69. Determina-se que se oficie ao Presidente do TRT para que proceda à avocatória do processo principal para o reexame da sentença rescindenda.

Súmula 423/STF - Não transita em julgado a sentença por haver omitido o recurso ex officio, que se considera interposto ex lege.

Súmula nº405/TST - AÇÃO RESCISÓRIA. TUTELA PROVISÓRIA (nova reda-ção em decorrência do CPC de 2015) - Em face do que dispõem a MP 1.984-22/2000 e o art. 969 do CPC de 2015, é cabível o <u>pedido de tutela provisória</u> formulado na petição inicial de ação rescisória ou na fase recursal, visando a suspender a execução da decisão rescindenda.

And hawkish central banks

Environmental advertising claims may face legal scrutiny if they cannot be supported with verifiable evidence. Without transparent reporting or independent certification, consumers could potentially interpret this statement as deceptive advertising.

This message positions the company as environmentally responsible, which may create a positive “green” brand image without fully addressing criticism about plastic waste generation. This could be considered reputation management rather than evidence of substantial environmental change.

The statement acknowledges a global waste problem but minimizes Coca-Cola’s role in creating plastic pollution. Critics argue that large beverage companies significantly contribute to packaging waste worldwide.

This statement promotes recycled content but does not address the continued production of single-use plastic bottles. Ethical concerns arise because the company focuses on recycling rather than reducing plastic production altogether.

Saying packaging is “recyclable” can be misleading because recyclable does not necessarily mean the packaging will actually be recycled in real-world waste systems. Recycling depends on local infrastructure, consumer behavior, and collection systems, which are not discussed here.

The wording “aim to” is vague because it expresses intention rather than guaranteed achievement. The statement does not explain how the company will verify or enforce this goal, which may mislead consumers into believing the target is already being successfully achieved.

The phrase “World Without Waste” creates the impression that Coca-Cola’s packaging system is environmentally sustainable and close to zero waste. However, the company remains one of the world’s largest producers of plastic packaging, making this claim potentially misleading and an example of greenwashing

9:20 PMClaude responded: The Coca-Cola AI Christmas ad is a clear example of purpose-washing.The Coca-Cola AI Christmas ad is a clear example of purpose-washing. By framing a cost-cutting decision as "embracing the future of creativity," the brand disguises a commercial motive as artistic vision. Worse, celebrating "real human connections" in a fully AI-generated ad is a direct contradiction — and audiences saw right through it, responding with widespread mockery rather than the nostalgic warmth Coca-Cola was aiming for.

While this adds technical detail, it may still be unclear to consumers why limitations exist. The explanation is incomplete and may distract from the overall environmental impact, reducing transparency.

This wording may pose legal risk under consumer protection and advertising laws if the claim is not clearly substantiated. Terms like “sustainable” and “more sustainable” require evidence and clear benchmarks; otherwise, they may be considered misleading environmental advertising.

This framing may encourage consumers to believe that purchasing these products has a significantly positive environmental impact. Ethically, this can be problematic if the overall production system is still linked to fast fashion overconsumption and environmental harm.

The term “more sustainable materials” is broad and not fully transparent. It does not explain the full environmental impact of production, processing, or supply chain. “At least 50%” may also suggest partial sustainability, which can mislead consumers into overestimating the product’s overall environmental friendliness.

This phrase is vague and emotionally appealing but does not define what “extra consideration” means in measurable terms. It may create a positive environmental impression without providing concrete environmental impact data, which can be considered a form of greenwashing.

"confidently play us back the society arround us"

Nice

描写扬州十日的惨烈，悼念死去同胞；

后续：扬州陷落后，马士英掩护太后撤离，被清军抓获后杀害。 马士英之子马銮掩护弘光帝撤离南京，弘光帝落入追击清兵之手，马銮与弘光帝失散，在乡间隐蔽十六年。永历帝被害后，马銮回到南京，以教书算命为生，被曹玺聘为曹寅的老师，形同父子。马銮的兄弟留守南京，被清军杀害，首级被悬挂示众。马士英亲族多为清军灭门杀害。马士英本人多被东林党分子污蔑为“奸臣”，《桃花扇》就描述了“奸臣马士英”的形象，并将“左良玉”描绘为南明忠臣。晴雯撕扇既撕《桃花扇》。

弘光帝被俘后数月，清军又于七月四日攻破昆山，屠城六日。 昆山顾氏女，成为曹玺女奴，剩下曹寅。

三藩战争期间，马銮病逝，曹寅写下： 魂归故国青山晚，烽烟何日反山川

清军攻破扬州之日，林黛玉吃了贾宝玉的闭门羹，写下葬花吟，当面痛骂贾宝玉“狠心短命”。

1645年农历的三月二十八日，南明将领左良玉发动叛乱，扬言“清君侧”惩办马士英，率军沿江东下，直逼南京，南京朝廷极为恐慌。四月一日，福王密诏史可法督诸军急赴江上阻击左良玉。史可法无奈，只好率各镇兵马抵达浦口。此时清兵趁机已入亳州，到邳州，徐、泗州告急，南明皇帝命令史可法还军扬州。接着就是扬州被围城一月，四月二十五夜扬州失陷，四月二十六日清军开始屠城，十日才封刀，这是历史上中国人几乎不敢正视的的“扬州十日”。 由于是清军惨无人道的杀戮，清朝并未将其写入历史。后来一些有正义感的文人，试图记载这段历史，几乎都遭到了惨绝人寰的镇压与制裁，只有少数幸存者秘密记述了那场灾难。比如幸存者王秀楚的《扬州十日记》，而《扬州十日记》直到辛亥革命前夕才从海外带回中国。

马士英受到左良玉的打击

左良玉以“清君侧”之名发动叛乱

马士英，其子马銮，《咏美人三十六绝句》

The title immediately labels the brands as “sustainable” without presenting evidence or certification. This may create a misleading impression that all featured brands fully meet sustainability standards.

The article claims transparency, but detailed sustainability criteria, audits, and product-level evidence are not fully disclosed, which may limit actual transparency.

Highlighting recycled polyester may distract consumers from other environmental impacts such as microplastic pollution and overproduction in fashion.

The article does not explain what “responsibly sourced” means or provide certifications to verify these sustainability claims.

The phrase “more eco-friendly” is unclear because the article does not specify which materials are used or how environmentally beneficial they actually are.

The article claims these brands are “leading the change” without providing evidence such as sustainability rankings, reports, or verified achievements.

This uses emotional environmental appeal to encourage purchasing behavior, implying that shopping itself directly helps save the planet.

“Eco-friendly” is a broad environmental term that lacks clear explanation. Consumers may misunderstand the actual environmental benefits

The phrase “more responsible” is vague because it does not explain what standards or measurements are used to define responsibility.

The statement assumes these brands successfully reduce environmental damage, but no data or measurable proof is provided to support the claim

misleading language: This statement may be misleading because the report also shows that SHEIN’s greenhouse gas emissions increased by 23.1% in 2024.

Legal risks: If the company cannot provide sufficient proof or fails to achieve these environmental targets, it may face accusations of misleading advertising or greenwashing under consumer protection laws.

Ethical concerns: This raises ethical concerns because fast fashion encourages overconsumption, textile waste, and environmental pollution while promoting cheap and trendy clothing.

Greenwashing: This statement may be considered greenwashing because SHEIN promotes an environmentally friendly image despite the report showing an increase in greenhouse gas emissions.

和圖&圖說矛盾？？！

study TOC - but try not to get tested on it

💻/thinkpad/🧊/me/📓/2026/5/1/7

indy.dweb.archive>🔍~google=conscious.pariah-social.nonconformism-intellectual.achievement

mu own annotation

I did not have the words for it but it is a deep parameter of my own life

Great visualization OR vs Risk difference

embraced

key concept in my own self-curated realtme "Bildung Romance"

应指《桃花扇》（孔尚任）中颠倒黑白，在南明发动公开军事叛乱，吸引住了南明一半多野战部队，为满清创造进攻机会的左良玉，被美化成了南明的忠臣。他死后（1645），其子摔军降清，军事集团被编入汉军旗，在湖南、山西等地到处镇压反清起义，杀人屠城无恶不作。最残酷的大同屠城就有这个集团的参与。

This passage exposes the precise methodological flaw used to mislead consumers. By using generalized "textile averages" rather than the actual life-cycle assessment (LCA) of a specific finished garment, H&M completely bypassed accounting for high-pollution phases like factory manufacturing, toxic chemical dyeing, global shipping, and retail waste. This is a classic greenwashing tactic: using macro-level data to mask micro-level environmental damage.

This statement by an industry expert contextualizes H&M's actions within a broader, historical corporate pattern. It highlights that "greenwashing" is not a recent mistake caused by bad data, but a calculated, decades-long marketing strategy used by retailers to exploit changing consumer values without fundamentally changing their carbon-heavy business models.

This sentence provides direct evidence of severe data manipulation. Instead of merely exaggerating their green efforts, H&M displayed metrics that were a complete inversion of reality. For instance, garments that actually required significantly more water to produce were deceptively marketed as using less water.

the picture size is to big