for - definition - progress - material - economist Sydney Pollard - improvement

There's no telling how much money he lost, that would involve simple math!

If your garden is well maintained, you are more likely to spend time there. A well-kept garden can create an overwhelming feeling of calm and order even when you’re just looking out at it. This is similar to having a clean, neat and tidy house. Feeling better is good. Furthermore, a beautiful and healthy garden will truly enhance the appearance of your property. To accomplish that, there are a variety of steps that need to be taken.

When you engage a professional gardening cleaning service, they ensure that your garden's lawn and hedges are properly mowed and manicured.

Family of three contract Covid from infected neighbours in hotel quarantine in Sydney | Australia news | The Guardian. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/apr/18/family-of-three-contract-covid-from-infected-neighbours-in-hotel-quarantine-in-sydney

the Guardian. ‘Air New Zealand to Trial Covid Vaccine Passport on Sydney Flights’, 23 February 2021. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/23/air-new-zealand-to-trial-covid-vaccine-passport-on-sydney-flights.

This is a flawed proposition and both misleading and deceptive in relation to the subject matter, considering its prominence in a court media report of proceedings which largely centre on the propriety or otherwise of an approvals process.

Using a market analogy mischaracterises the process involved in seeking and gaining approval for a proposal based on an innovative occupational health and safety concept.

In this case, the Minister was the appropriate authority under the relevant NSW laws.

And while Mr Maitland could indeed be described as a "entrepreneur", the phrase "willing buyer" taken literally in the context of the process to which he was constrained, could contaminate the reader's perception of the process as transactional or necessitating exchange of funds a conventional buyer and seller relationship.

Based on evidence already tendered in open court, it's already known Mr Maitland sought both legal advice on the applicable process as well as guidance by officials and other representatives with whom he necessarily engaged.

But the concept of finding a "willing buyer", taken literally at it's most extreme, could suggest Mr Maitland was presented with multiple approvals processes and to ultimately reach his goal, engaged in a market force-style comparative assessment of the conditions attached to each of these processes to ultimately decide on which approvals process to pursue.

Plainly, this was not the case. Mr Maitland had sought advice on the process and proceeded accordingly.

The only exception that could exist in relation to the availability of alternative processes could be a situation silimilar to the handling of unsolicited proposals by former Premier Barry O'Farrell over casino licenses which were not constrained by any of the regular transparency-related requirements including community engagement, notification or competitive tender.

Again, this situation does not and could not apply to the process applicable to Mr Maitland's proposal.

The misleading concepts introduced from the outset in this article also represent an aggravating feature of the injustice to which Mr Maitland has been subjected.

To be found criminally culpable in a matter involving actions undertaken in an honest belief they were required in a process for which Mr Maitland both sought advice process and then at no stage was told anything that would suggest his understanding of the process was incorrect, contradicts fundamental principles of natural justice.

Great idea.

SFS is gawn. Truly gawn. A bit sad.

Naughty naughty.

Yes! Best description ever.

Overly restrictive Sydney CBD planning restrictions 101. I have no idea why this is so limited in height etc.

Looks fab, well done Parramatta.

Fab construction diagrams on this page. Thanks to Culwulla on SSC forums.

Incredibly complicated and expensive build, fitting within severe planning controls. It's too restrictive, the economics of the Sydney CBD must surely be singularly unique.

Beautiful! Look at the link :)

More awesome stuff.

Awesome stuff.

Impressively ugly shite.

Looks nice architecturally.

Largely agree. It's all very controlled, with a bit of decent archi. But it certainly doesn't feel 'real', tactile.. like there is any ownership. It belongs to ritzy people, ritzy gov, and ritzy gov-corporate relationships. Yerp.

City starting to look quite different.

Awesome news. This MUST be rolled into Crossrail/West Metro planning works.

Good facade articulation to breakdown the mass of the building.

Is alrightish. I like the two-volume articulation.

Nice normal stuff.

BAN dumb names. Just "123 Main Street" allowable.

These sort of renders have a lot to answer for.

It's just too small.

The diagram above highlights the wastefulness and out-of-this-world-economics that applies to City of Sydney priorities in the Sydney CBD.

Boo. Crossrail > West "Metro".

This makes me laugh. Love it.

NO. This is a perfect site for a future "River Metro" station. STOP STOP STOP.

City of Sydney. Should it have CBD planning powers? It's scope of interest is too limited for a metropolitan area as big as Sydney.

5131326

12367.7

33.87

84

80.2

72

76.22

75.35

72.65

62.11

5419.09

43.98

.938

Response piece "No Surprise The Young Don't Support Lock-Out Laws" (31 Aug 2016) at Stony Roads mentions this statement.

There are some terrible personal opinions in this article that really push a tired and very under constructive rhetoric.

'Those crying the loudest to stop the lock-out laws fail to provide an adequate alternative'.

This quote alone shows a lack of research into Matt Barrie's 70 page submission, any consideration into the views of the people who went to the effort of writing 1 of the 1,856 submissions to State parliament, or simply the lack of effort to type in google, 'alternative solutions to lockout laws'.

The reference to "Matt Barrie's 70 page submission" can be supposed as that included in the article posted by Matt Barrie on LinkedIn, "The death of Sydney's nightlife and collapse of its night time economy" (03 April 2016), submission titled "A Detailed Submission to the Callinan Inquiry on Liquor Laws". That submission/article is mainly about the circumstances under which the lock-out laws were proposed and enacted, as well as the results of those laws so far (with considerable detail on political and statistical manipulations and misrepresentations), and not so much about providing alternatives, however it does suggest that the lock-out laws themselves are far from an adequate solution.

Note that Matt Barrie's submission was covered fairly well by the SMH in their own article, "Sydney lockout laws a dismal failure, Matt Barrie writes in 70-page submission" (04 April 2016). The article by Jennifer Duke this annotation is for is, by stark contrast, little more than anecdotal or purely "personal opinion".

The group named Keep Sydney Open is probably representative of "those crying the loudest", having organised public rallies attended by many thousands of people (estimates of 10,000 to 15,000). The Huffington Post interviewed spokesperson, Tyson Koh, for the article "Sydney Lockout Laws Have Had A 'Massive Effect' On Community, Jobs" (13 Feb 2016):

Koh pointed to a number of alternate strategies used in places like New York, Vancouver and Amsterdam to combat late-night violence.

Twenty four-hour public transport, more visible policing in nightlife precincts, staggered venue closing times and introducing later dining and retail hours all had merit, he said.

"There's a lot of things that are available to us that will improve safety and enable people to go out to all hours."