Keeping bootstrap-sass in sync with upstream changes from Bootstrap used to be an error prone and time consuming manual process. With Bootstrap 3 we have introduced a converter that automates this.

Because of those similarities, it's possible to automate some of the changes.

This needs to be documented (issue in webpack/webpack.js.org will be filed when merged)

the actual upgrade path should be very simple for most people since the deprecated things are mostly edge cases and any common ones can be codemodded

(At the point at which it does make sense to turn this into a separate Tooltip.svelte component, the extraction is a completely mechanical process that could even be automated by tooling.)

It’s important to note that where the GDPR applies, intended use factors into whether or not consent is required as even statistical data can fall under “profiling” or “monitoring” depending on how the data is being used.

I originally did not use this approach because many pages that require translation are behind authentication that cannot/should not be run through these proxies.

It shouldn't be problem to watch the remote scripts for changes using Travis and repack and submit a new version automatically (depends on licensing). It does not put the script under your control, but at least it's in the package and can be reviewed.

In case you’re implementing any ADM process, you have to tell your users.

Some languages are crowd-sourced with free labor, and they make money out of it.

You might try this extension: https://github.com/andreicristianpetcu/google_translate_this It does the same thing in the same way as Page Translator and likely will be blocked by Mozilla, but this is a cat and mouse game worth playing if you rely on full-page in-line language translation.

For automated testing, include the parameter is_test=1 in your tests. That will tell Akismet not to change its behaviour based on those API calls – they will have no training effect. That means your tests will be somewhat repeatable, in the sense that one test won’t influence subsequent calls.

Global industrial robot sales

With SmartBooks, students can see the important content highlighted

Open Source[edit] LightSide[43] EASE[44] - Published by EdX.

Alternatively, Daphne Koller and Andrew Ng who are the founders of Coursera, a Stanford MOOC startup, have decided to use peer evaluation to assess writing. Koller and Ng (2012) specifically used the term “calibrated peer review” to refer to a method of peer review distinct from an application developed by UCLA with National Science Foundation funding called Calibrated Peer Review™ (CPR). For Koller and Ng, “calibrated peer review” is a specific form of peer review in which students are trained on a particular scoring rubric for an assignment using practice essays before they begin the peer review process.

A rigorous understanding of these developmental processes requires automated methods that quantitatively record and analyze complex morphologies and their associated patterns of gene expression at cellular resolution.