For some reason, Hypothesis isn't allowing me to making line item comments.
Here are a few small suggestions for your lucid, perceptive, beautifully written essay.
Since you cite our website so often, it feels like it falsely gives me credit for work that is collaborative or by other authors. It might be better to use the parenthetical (mina-loy.com) and/or cite the author of the particular page or item you're citing on that project. For example, you might use (Rosenbaum) for her chapters on Surrealism, and treat the citation as a chapter in an edited collection, where the author of the chapter is cited, and the edition info is secondary.
"Regardless, more work needs to be done" seems like a sentence that could be applied to almost any artist, and certainly any woman artist. Can you point to some more specific issue that needs attention? Such a move would foreground your contribution and whet our appetites prior to the lit review that follows.
Excellent, concise, confident, and illuminating lit review. It may be a bit unfair to charge Rosenbaum with categorizing Loy's work as Surrealist, since she's specifically looking at work Loy created when actively participating as artist, writer, and agent in Surrealist artistic activities AND she argues that Loy was critiquing Surrealism as much as participating, adopting en dehors garde strategies of engagement and resistance.