“spirit of Silicon Valley” is “a precious thing that needs to be protected.”
What exactly that spirit is might be the problem. No one outside of it understands that.
“spirit of Silicon Valley” is “a precious thing that needs to be protected.”
What exactly that spirit is might be the problem. No one outside of it understands that.
a contingent of the media has been increasingly critical of Silicon Valley, charging tech founders, C.E.O.s, venture capitalists, and other technology boosters with an arrogant, naïve, and reckless attitude toward the institutions of a functional democracy, noting their tendency to disguise anticompetitive, extractive behavior as disruptive innovation.
And here we are in 2026 and they were exactly right. It's even worse now.
Big Tech, intellektuelle Monopolisierung und die Zentralisierung von Wissen sind ein extremes Beispiel für Zentralisierung.
Early in 2013, Ronald Robertson, now a doctoral candidate at the Network Science Institute at Northeastern University in Boston, and I discovered that Google isn’t just spying on us; it also has the power to exert an enormous impact on our opinions, purchases and votes.
he Search Suggestion Effect (SSE), the Answer Bot Effect (ABE), the Targeted Messaging Effect (TME), and the Opinion Matching Effect (OME), among others. Effects like these might now be impacting the opinions, beliefs, attitudes, decisions, purchases and voting preferences of more than two billion people every day.
author: Robert Epstein
quote
the private sector has made university-level learning accessible and free, employs over 70% of all Americans, and inches nearer every year to making death optional
Is the private sector, aka Big Tech, more powerful and capable the government itself?
But as tech companies have turned to mass layoffs in recent months, the big bets have increasingly looked like bad bets for
Say sometihng.
hat we want is to be able to leave Facebook and still talk to our friends, instead of having many Facebooks.
What about Matrix?
Twitter is the preferred platform for our elites. Journalists and media pundits
Case in point, October 21, 2022 headline from Bloomberg News: "Musk Gutting Twitter Would Be a Threat to Us All." This hysterical headline highlights Mr. MacIntyre's point, which I quoted here, about Twitter and elites. Moreover, the wording leads one to wonder whether Bloomberg News has contacts inside Twitter.
Hence, to keep things balanced, I think we should constantly oppose the anti-competitive behavior by tech giants and start using Mozilla Firefox (in whatever capacity, even as a secondary browser).
This is an interesting argument as to what individual users can do to keep Firefox alive. But the biggest dent on anti-competitive behavior should come from well enforced proper anti-trust regulations the way Europe is doing it. How can browser users contribute to this?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/dec/06/google-silicon-valley-ai-timnit-gebru
In order to truly have checks and balances, we should not have the same people setting the agendas of big tech, research, government and the non-profit sector. We need alternatives. We need governments around the world to invest in communities building technology that genuinely benefits them, rather than pursuing an agenda that is set by big tech or the military. Contrary to big tech executives’ cold-war style rhetoric about an arms race, what truly stifles innovation is the current arrangement where a few people build harmful technology and others constantly work to prevent harm, unable to find the time, space or resources to implement their own vision of the future.
She's talking about monopolies here. How can we break the monopolies of big tech?
Here again is an example of the extreme power of granting corporations the ability to be protected as "people".
Espinoza, J. (2021, November 28). Vestager urges European legislators to push through rules to regulate Big Tech. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/1880d0fb-0651-47ed-a8f4-6cde0f729859
consumer friendly
Including the "consumer" here is a red herring. We're meant to identify as the consumer and so take from this statement that our rights and best interests have been written into these BigTech-crafted laws.
But a "consumer" is different from a "citizen," a "person," we the people.
passage in March of a consumer data privacy law in Virginia, which Protocol reported was originally authored by Amazon
From the article:
Marsden and Virginia delegate Cliff Hayes held meetings with other large tech companies, including Microsoft; financial institutions, including Capital One; and non-profit groups and small businesses...
Which all have something at stake here: the ability to monitor people and mine their data in order to sell it.
Weak privacy laws give the illusion of privacy while maintaining the corporate panopticon.
The problem with US Big Tech is bigger, deeper – iceberg-dimensioned, you might say – and not even remotely blockchain-sized or shaped. Leslie Daigle has described the consolidation of the entire Internet stack under the hierarchical and totalizing business models of US tech firms as “climate change for the Internet’. If we don’t fix it, I personally do not believe we will be able to fix much else. That’s why my life’s work is helping to fix it. And by fix, I mean destroy.
I want this career!
Walsh, J. D. (2020, May 11). The Coming Disruption to College. Intelligencer. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/05/scott-galloway-future-of-college.html
Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft. These big five American vertically organized silos are re-making the world in their image.