6 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2022
  2. theconversation.com theconversation.com
    Don’t Look Up Illustrates 5 Myths That Fuel Rejection of Science
    1
    1. lucyparfitt16 14 Jan 2022

      US, G. S., Barbara K. Hofer,The Conversation. (n.d.). Don’t Look Up Illustrates 5 Myths That Fuel Rejection of Science. Scientific American. Retrieved January 14, 2022, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dont-look-up-illustrates-5-myths-that-fuel-rejection-of-science/

      is:webpage lang:en science climate change scientific certainty scientific evidence media politicians science denial COVID-19 psychology certainty inaction technology motivated reasoning economy ideology
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    theconversation.com/dont-look-up-hollywoods-primer-on-climate-denial-illustrates-5-myths-that-fuel-rejection-of-science-174266
  3. Oct 2021
  4. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    Exposure to Arguments and Evidence Changes Partisan Attitudes Even in the Face of Countervailing Leader Cues
    1
    1. jasminehollingworth 08 Oct 2021

      Tappin, B. M. (2021). Exposure to Arguments and Evidence Changes Partisan Attitudes Even in the Face of Countervailing Leader Cues. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/247bs

      lang:en is:preprint public opinion America politics effectiveness partisan survey policy persuaded demographic partisan motivated reasoning theory
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/247bs/
  5. Nov 2020
  6. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    The Cognitive Science of Fake News
    1
    1. marta_radosevic 30 Nov 2020

      Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2020). The Cognitive Science of Fake News. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ar96c

      is:preprint lang:en cognitive science fake news misinformation online truth falsehood knowledge reasoning heuristics social media inattention accuracy algorithm news media motivated reasoning dual process theory
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/ar96c/
  7. Aug 2020
  8. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    No Effect of Partisan Worldview on Corrections of Political Misinformation
    1
    1. katietaylor_99 24 Aug 2020

      Ecker, Ullrich, Brandon Sze, and Matthew Andreotta. ‘No Effect of Partisan Worldview on Corrections of Political Misinformation’, 20 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bszm4.

      is:preprint lang:en partisan worldview political misinformation corrections reasoning world-view driven motivated reasoning asymmetrical politically-conservative worldview effects inconsistent embezzlement inferential reasoning Republicans Democrats
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/bszm4/
  9. Jun 2020
  10. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    The Selective Communication of Political Information
    1
    1. edampf 19 Jun 2020

      Ekstrom, P. D., & Lai, C. K. (2020, June 18). The Selective Communication of Political Information. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pnr9u

      is:preprint lang:en COVID-19 attitude politics communication bias motivated reasoning political psychology selective exposure social network polarization
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/pnr9u/
  11. Apr 2020
  12. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    Politicizing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ideological Differences in Adherence to Social Distancing
    1
    1. edampf 27 Apr 2020

      Rosenfeld, D. L., Rothgerber, H., & Wilson, T. (2020, April 22). Politicizing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ideological Differences in Adherence to Social Distancing. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k23cv

      is:preprint COVID-19 lang:en motivated reasoning political ideology social distancing conservative compliance risk perception knowledge media misinformation politicization demographics social psychology behavioral science
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/k23cv/