gender-based digital transnational repression. Digital transnational repression describes the cross-border targeting by states of individuals in exile or in the diaspora using digital technologies to repress any form of dissent. In the case of gender-based digital transnational repression, those targeted with digital technologies are women.Footnote1 The attacks in these cases tend to focus on a woman’s body, social status, or family and appear to have the goal of denigrating, delegitimizing and discrediting the target. While male targets may find that the attacker engages with the content of what they are writing, women interviewed as part of our study often observed that attackers were not interested in their substantive political or social ideas or arguments, but focused on their body, appearance, or sexuality. This digital abuse has led to serious consequences including self-censorship, social isolation, and constant fear and anxiety. As we expand on further in this article, these outcomes reflect the silencing of women’s political voices and sabotage the potential for state accountability.

l'évolution à l'œuvre aujourd'hui invite toutefois à repenser cette analyse car une autre troisième forme de gouvernement s'impose désormais c'est la répression elle n'est pas nouvelle elle est même très ancienne mais elle se 01:02:22 redéploie dans un dans le cadre d'un état sécuritaire dont Jacques chevali a montré qu'il redéfinit les contours de l'État de droit cependant plutôt qu'à une ces dimension qu'à une succession de 01:02:34 paradigme de gouvernement on assiste à une sédimentation société de discipline société de contrôle société de répression s'additionne et se 01:02:46 combine

Carl Jung identified two forms of suffering: meaningless and meaningful. Meaningless suffering is everywhere, being part of the human condition, as the Buddha recognized. This existential suffering is the result of our trying to avoid pain, by denial and repression. None of us wants pain. We naturally shun it. But doing so is like the spleen refusing to do its job. It leads to big trouble, dis-ease, and real problems. In the realm of the psyche, these are called “neuroses.” Jung identified the long-term habit of repression (our “stuffing” unpleasant feelings, facts, etc. within) as the cause of neuroses.[2]

It was a radically different idea of nature and a radically different idea of the Unconscious—which were for Jung, the same thing. The Unconscious was no more than the inwardness of nature. For Freud it was the reject-matter of civilization, and the whole purpose of his psychology was to enable men to reject it more firmly. For Jung, the Unconscious was Mother; and the Oedipus myth was concerned with man’s troubled relationship (for he has to leave her) to that great, unconscious source.

I hated the sight of you,' he said. 'I wanted to rape you and then murder you afterwards. Two weeks ago I thought seriously of smashing your head in with a cobblestone. If you really want to know, I imagined that you had something to do with the Thought Police.'

The residents’ lack of success in drawing attention and widespread support to their struggle is a scenario that has been repeated the world over for decades in coun-tries led by dictators: rebellions are drowned out through silencing and censorship.

repression docs not apply

For targeted communities, there is little to no expectation of privacy from government or corporate surveillance. Instead, we are watched, either as criminals or as consumers. We do not expect policies to protect us. Instead, we’ve birthed a complex and coded culture—from jazz to spoken dialects—in order to navigate a world in which spying, from AT&T and Walmart to public benefits programs and beat cops on the block, is as much a part of our built environment as the streets covered in our blood.

enquiries advanced from the repressed to therepressing forces