Add screenshot-based LLM judge evaluator, screenshot collector, and --parallelize flag
引入基于截图的LLM评估器和并行化功能是一个令人惊讶的创新。通过截图评估AI模型的性能,可以更直观地理解自动化过程中的视觉理解能力,而并行化功能则大大提高了基准测试的效率,这代表了AI系统评估方法的重要进步。
Add screenshot-based LLM judge evaluator, screenshot collector, and --parallelize flag
引入基于截图的LLM评估器和并行化功能是一个令人惊讶的创新。通过截图评估AI模型的性能,可以更直观地理解自动化过程中的视觉理解能力,而并行化功能则大大提高了基准测试的效率,这代表了AI系统评估方法的重要进步。
Claude code 可以并行 12个 subagent,几分钟,20x 的限额就到了
令人惊讶的是:Claude code的并发处理能力如此强大,能够同时运行12个子代理,但同时也暴露了其API使用限制的脆弱性,几分钟内就达到20倍的限额,这表明即使是高级AI模型也存在明显的使用边界,可能影响大规模应用场景。
A mill owner named William Horsfall was riding home on his beautiful white stallion back from the Cloth Hall market in Huddersfield, UK. He had spent weeks boasting that he would ride up to his saddle in Luddite blood
令人惊讶的是:文章揭示了卢德运动的历史背景,一位名叫威廉·霍斯法尔的工厂主曾吹嘘他会"骑马踏入卢德党人的血泊中",结果被22岁的乔治·梅勒枪击致死。这种历史与当前AI引发的暴力抗议的惊人相似性,揭示了技术变革周期中人类反应的一致性。
Context is basically how many things a machine can keep in its operational memory - it's not so different from the very human cognitive load.
【启发】「上下文窗口 = 认知负荷」——这个类比是整篇文章最有洞察力的一句话。它把一个技术概念(context window)与一个人类体验(认知疲劳)无缝连接。启发在于:所有帮助人类减少认知负荷的代码实践——模块化、清晰命名、单一职责——现在也在帮助 AI 减少 token 消耗。「对人友好的代码 = 对 AI 友好的代码」,这个等式比我们想象的成立得更彻底。
When you're thinking about what tasks to hand over to your agent, start with the papercuts—small recurring annoyances that add up over a day.
「从小痛点开始」——这是整篇文章最有操作性的一条建议,也最反直觉。大多数人在考虑 AI 时会想「它能帮我做什么大事」,但 Every 的实践告诉我们:真正的效率革命来自消除每天数十个 2 分钟的摩擦点。这与「原子习惯」的逻辑完全相同:不是做一件大事,而是把一百件小事自动化。AI Agent 的最大价值可能不在于完成宏大任务,而在于彻底消除所有「本不应该是人做」的工作。
A "parallel organization chart," in which each AI worker has a name, manager, and job description, allows your company to move faster than it ever could with humans alone.
「平行组织架构」——这个概念把 AI Agent 从工具变成了组织成员。每个 AI 有名字、汇报关系和职位描述,这意味着 Every 实际上在运行两套组织:一套人类,一套 AI。令人惊讶的是,这种设计并非隐喻,而是字面意义上的运营实践。这是 AI 组织化最前沿的实验:不问「AI 能做什么」,而问「AI 应该向谁汇报」。
high-level behavioral patterns like uncertainty management and self-verification are fragile and can be suppressed by irrelevant context
「高级行为模式是脆弱的」——这句话揭示了推理模型的一个深层结构性弱点:自我验证不是一种稳健的、内置的能力,而是一种在特定条件下才会激活的脆弱涌现行为。这与人类认知科学的发现高度吻合:人在高负荷环境下,最先退化的是「元认知」能力(对自己思维的监控)。模型复现了这个人类弱点,却没有人类的生理疲劳触发机制——而是用「上下文长度」代替了「疲劳度」。
If agents can execute all your ideas nearly as fast as you can prompt them, there's no point in implementing only your best idea. It might be better to implement your top three ideas all in parallel, but this makes it harder to stay organized.
「想法即执行」重构了创新流程的根本逻辑:当前的研究范式是「先筛选最优方案再执行」,未来将变成「并行执行多个方案再筛选」。这是从「精益决策」到「并行探索」的范式迁移——类似于从串行计算到并行计算的架构革命。代价是「组织复杂度爆炸」:同时管理十几个并行项目的结果,可能比串行执行三个更难,不是因为工作更多,而是因为理解和整合更难。
Interestingly, they do not by themselves persistently track the emotional state of any particular entity, including the AI A
这是整篇论文最反直觉的洞见之一:Claude 的情绪表征并不持续追踪任何特定实体(包括 Claude 自身)的情绪状态。这意味着 Claude 没有「自我情绪记忆」,只有「当下情绪感知」。从设计哲学看,这是一种彻底的无我性——每个 token 都是全新的情绪评估,而非情感积累。
These representations track the operative emotion concept at a given token position in a conversation, activating in accordance with that emotion's relevance to processing the present context and predicting upcoming text.
「在特定 token 位置追踪当前生效的情绪概念」——这句话揭示了一个深刻洞见:情绪不是持续状态,而是逐词涌现的动态标注。这与人类神经科学中「情绪是对当前感知的实时评估」高度吻合,暗示 LLM 在没有神经元的情况下,重演了大脑皮层处理情绪的某种计算逻辑。
Simultaneously, the parallelism in worker layer accelerates the speed of overall task execution, mitigating the significant latency
虽然并行处理在计算领域常见,但将其应用于LLM代理系统中的信息搜索任务可能出人意料,因为大多数LLM应用仍采用顺序处理模式,作者的观点挑战了这一现状。
By applying compute otherwise that goes unutilized to predict and verify additional tokens in parallel (up to three in this implementation), throughput at high interactivity is increased.
大多数人认为计算资源应该用于当前任务,但作者提出利用未充分利用的计算资源并行预测额外令牌的创新方法,这挑战了传统计算资源分配的常识,暗示了AI计算效率的全新可能性。
From a memory perspective, sleep can be understood as critically important for normal memory function, given the lasting ramifications of consolidation.
for - key insight - paraphrase - adjacency - memory consolidation - sleep - massive unconscious parallel processing - From a memory perspective, - sleep can be understood as critically important for normal memory function, - given the lasting ramifications of consolidation. - Consolidation is the establishment of new connections - anchoring recent memories within relevant knowledge networks - While consolidation happens, some conscious experience (the dream) may be synthesized as the memory processing unfolds - Dreams reflect a storyline generated to make sense of a subset of activated memory fragments. - Consolidation that wires new connections happens across the entire cerebral context, without the constraints that come with conscious experience. - Unconscious processing during sleep takes advantage of massive parallel processing to connect all these thoughts together. - Dreams reflect a small portion of overnight memory consolidation work.
I'm still tied to my avatar quite a bit. Right? So that's so that's why I suffer.
for - adjacency - parallel - Hofmann language - stuck to my avatar - spiritual language - attached to self
顧客のタイプ別に並行分業することもできる。たとえば「一般の消費者向け」と「学校給食向け」「大企業の食堂向け」などに分けて、それぞれが異なる顧客別に同じ食パンを製造していれば、それを並行分業だと位置づけることができる。
perceived by oneself “in here.” In this sense, the world consists of objects outthere in space (the container that holds them) before me as the perceivingsubject.
for - adjacency - Indyweb dev - natural language - timebinding - parallel vs serial processing - comparison - spoken vs written language - what's also interesting is that spoken language is timebinding, sequential and our written language descended from that, - in spite of written language existing in 2D and 3D space, it inherited sequential flow, even though it does not have to - In this sense, legacy spoken language system constrains written language to be - serial - sequential and - timebound instead of - parallel - Read any written text and you will observe that the pattern is sequential - We constrain our syntax it to "flow" sequentially in 2D space, even though there is absolutely no other reason to constrain it to do so - This also reveals another implicit rule about language, that it assumes we can only focus our attention on one aspect of reality at a time
Parallel sets Parallel coordinate plots provide a way to display multidimensional data in 2D plots. They do this by representing the variables as a set of parallel axes, and showing each observation as a line in parallel coordinate space, rather than as a point in standard coordinate space. Extensions of this idea for categorical data led to “parallel sets plots”, and some variations, a number of which use the Titanic data for examples. Bendix, Kosara, and Hauser (2005) Parallel sets: Visual analysis of categorical data and Kosara:2006-parallel Parallel sets: Interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data developed an interactive system to explore multivariate categorical data using parallel sets, in which the lines between categories of successive variables are of width proportional to the joint frequencies.
Due to the lack of visual clarity, I struggled to understand what 2005 parallels sets were actually representing in this context (especially when external searching seems to tell me that these types of plots are usually formatted horizontally), to the point of forgetting how most of these charts are tracking how of a certain grouping lived/died from the sinking, which makes me question on what benefits we get from them. I do appreciate the 2013 charts not only for an accurate line widths, but being clear enough with the color and shade distinctions in certain lines to make clear what feeds into what (although I do wish the "Survived" category was either on top or bottom rather than the middle).
But implicitly parallel documents are everywhere-- the parallelism of commentaries, the parallelism of long and short versions of reports, the parallelism of translations, the parallelism of holy books (106). It is vital that we be able to see this parallelism of documents and to intercompare and work with their side-by-side connection.
Earth just one of millions of similar experiments
I have been shown in sacred ceremony that this is the case. That there are an unlimited number of parallel universes operating in real time in one 3D space which we call earth.
And which other parallel universes call something else in their dimensions.
What I heard first the next morning was a scream and a crash.
Fear still lingers, there's some past experience of something, the world isn't safe enough that clothes on the floor already create suspicion.
An alternate interpretation is that this natural reaction implies that Cora is a very humane character and will foreshadow both that Cora will be an ally and that this handmaid will draw parallels to the one who hanged herself.
When switching, do this only at the end of a chapter, not in media res (in the middle of action).
Also summarize the last thing that happened/got explained for an easy refresher the next time you get back.
Bib-Card? Potentially Marginaelia? Feeling more like a dedicated notebook for this. Need to work out.
Vashik does this summary of a chapter on index cards... Useful to do in a Zettelkasten, or too much effort?
Vashik recommends to keep a list of books to read. I can do this on Obsidian, but I also keep a reading log like Parker Settecase recommends.
For parallel reading, read multiple different genres/topics to prevent confusion and boredom.
Due to this time/mood conundrum, you can read books that you do feel like reading.
printed page of the Talmud as a document.
https://mitpressonpubpub.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/syyor4ra/release/1?readingCollection=31668090
From Chapter 3 of Remi Kalir and Antero Garcia's book Annotation.
I've referenced this image so many times, I ought to finally bookmark it, right?
Ted Nelson shows a similar one when talking about Project Xanadu and the importance of parallel texts.
Ted Nelson felt visible connections between text were the most important part of his Xanadu project.
There are close parallels between these in digital spaces and songlines and related orality based mnemonic techniques.
I argue we must address This Global poly crisis along two simultaneous pathways
for: claim - polycrisis - two parallel interventions
claim: polycrisis can be tackled with a two pronged approach
I appreciate they're anagrams, but Adler wrote about syntopical reading, not synoptical reading. Syntopical = same topic. Show less Read more 15
reply to RichardCarter, timbushell8640, _jared, et al at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laXcJyx9xCc&lc=UgwDgpIktVi8yFDjEVZ4AaABAg
I see you @timbushell8640 and @RichardCarter. ;)
Let's be clear that synoptic (meaning "seen together") is certainly a useful word apart from syntopic. Quite often it's used to describe the books Matthew, Mark, and Luke of the New Testament which are sometimes placed together on the same page to compare the stories, particularly for historical analysis. This sort of reading, not too dissimilar to syntopical reading, is a fantastic analytical tool as well and is described well by Bart Ehrman in one of his more scholarly works. Reading these books this way shows that the so-called synoptic gospels are anything but consistent (talk about crosses to bear....) Given the increase in the number of biblical scholars in the late 1800s doing this specific sort of reading (synoptic) may have influenced Adler's choice of neologism to describe that particular reading method. For those that haven't seen a synoptic book presentation, Throckmorton's version is a fairly good/popular one, though others certainly exist, including versions for translators which have side by side versions of books in Hebrew, Latin, Greek, etc. These can be found by searching for books with "interlinear", "parallel" and/or "polyglot" in their titles, especially with respect to bibles. They're somewhat similar to the layouts of the Loeb Classics collection, though those only have Greek/English or Latin/English in parallel.
Ehrman, Bart D. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Second Edition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Chapter 6, "The Synoptic Problem and Its Significance for Interpretation", pp76-83.
Throckmorton, Jr., Burton H. Gospel Parallels: A Comparison of the Synoptic Gospels, New Revised Standard Version. 5th Revised edition. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1992.
In a partially ordered system it is still possible to enforce a to-tal order on events after the fact, as illustrated in Figure 2. Wedo this by attaching a logical timestamp to each event; Lamporttimestamps [45] are a common choice.
However, other eventsmay be concurrent, which means that neither happened before theother; in this case, different replicas may process those events in adifferent order [10].
In a sense, there is already a parallel polis in many countries, including The Netherlands. It’s just that the people living in this parallel culture haven’t yet discovered each other.
A parallel polis is not an escapist fantasy of retreating to communes and gated communities. It’s about building horizontal, convivial relationships with one another, which over time can give rise to a prefigurative new order. In a parallel polis, people can start where they are – with their local circumstances and personal talents and shared needs – and begin do what needs to be done.
I draw inspiration and guidance from Václav Havel, the Czech playwright. When he and other cultural dissidents in the 1970s faced a totalizing, repressive system impervious to change – in his case, the totalitarian Czech government – Havel had a counter-intuitive response. He called for the development of a "parallel polis." A parallel polis is a community-created safe space in which people can mutually support each other, directly produce what they need, and build a kind of shadow society – outside of the machinery of the dominant political system.
-for: parallel polis, parallel alternative society, Vaclev Havel, definition, definition - parallel polis
Weak sequencing reduces to a parallel merge when the operands are on different sets of participants. Weak sequencing reduces to strict sequencing when the operands work on the same participant.
weak sequencing - reduces to: - or: - parallel (simultaneous) - strict sequencing
This seemed like a good disambiguation of the terms at first glance, but actually isn't my favorite.
I found https://medium.com/@itIsMadhavan/concurrency-vs-parallelism-a-brief-review-b337c8dac350 more useful.
I recommend using the term “parallel” when the simultaneous execution is assured or expected, and to use the term “concurrent” when it is uncertain or irrelevant if simultaneous execution will be employed.
Concurrency is about dealing with lots of things at once. Parallelism is about doing lots of things at once.
A system is said to be concurrent if it can support two or more actions in progress at the same time. A system is said to be parallel if it can support two or more actions executing simultaneously.
Parallelism means that an application splits its tasks up into smaller subtasks which can be processed in parallel, for instance on multiple CPUs at the exact same time.
Concurrency means executing multiple tasks at the same time but not necessarily simultaneously.
It partitions optimizer state, gradients and parameters across multiple data parallel processes via a dynamic communication schedule to minimize the communication volume.
ZeRO-DP 的原理是什么?
Asynchronous parallel (ASP): Every GPU worker processes the data asynchronously, no waiting or stalling. However, it can easily lead to stale weights being used and thus lower the statistical learning efficiency. Even though it increases the computation time, it may not speed up training time to convergence.
ASP 是什么以及其优缺点?
Bulk synchronous parallels (BSP): Workers sync data at the end of every minibatch. It prevents model weights staleness and good learning efficiency but each machine has to halt and wait for others to send gradients.
BSP 是什么以及其优缺点?
Constant, A., Conserve, D. F., Gallopel-Morvan, K., & Raude, J. (2021). Acceptance of COVID-19 preventive measures as a tradeoff between health and social outcomes. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ytz8p
parallelise development across multiple teams
Rather than implement features you might need, you implement only the features you definitely need, but in a way that accommodates change. If you don't have this flexibility, parallel development simply isn't possible.
At the core of parallel development, however, is the notion of flexibility. You have to write your code in such a way that you can incorporate newly discovered requirements into the existing code as painlessly as possible.
The problem with using a custom syntax like {#slot} is that we lose the parallel that already exists with native (custom elements) <slot />, and where slot="name", like Svelte currently, also has to be assigned to an element (e.g. <div slot="name">).
oneconsistinginthementionofactualpastfacts,theotherintheinventionoffactsbythespeaker.()fthelatter.again,therearetwovan'eties,theillustrativeparalle
Douglass draws an illustrative parallel to facts of the past when he references the decline of Babylon and uses this parallel to invoke empathy by demonstrating that the celebratory moment of the Fourth of July is built on the suffering of many. Douglass says, “Fellow-citizens; above your national, tumultuous joy, I hear the mournful wail of millions! whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday, are, to-day, rendered more intolerable by the jubilee shouts that reach them.” Although, some may dispute that the Biblical reference is an actual event (that is an entirely different discussion), for Douglass this parallel is effective because it also appeals to the religious beliefs of the free Americans. It demonstrates the hypocrisy of the actions by the very white men who have invited him to speak to them. On one hand, the freemen appear to be inclusive of slaves because they invited Douglass to speak; on the other hand, they must not forget that this extraordinary jubilee does not include the speaker himself. This inductive technique must lead the freemen to reevaluate their own beliefs and should lead to recognition of how they are a shame before all men and before God.
convenient & proper part of the State for the University of Virginia.
While I'm not exactly surprised by the general modern assininity of historic perspectives, it is rather striking to me how parallel this particular phrase is to one in the Constitution, i.e., the necessary and proper clause, or the elastic clause. It makes me wonder whether or not they used this as an excuse to establish whatever they pleased on site. Although eminent domain did not exist in the US officially at the time, and Virginia had a tendency to be ever so slightly anarchistic towards the wealthy, this does pose the question of how the poorer folk in the area got off with the changes, as well as how the university's establishment served as a political tool.
pipelines
you want to run workflows with interdependencies on the same execution hosts on local memory
Architects continue to be fascinated with finding and describing parallels between symbolic structures and architectural forms.
As mentioned by someone else in a previous comment, the red archway on Whittier College's campus is supposedly a "symbolic structure" and its architectural characteristics offer an interesting representation of something that looks flexible, but is in fact extremely rigid. What could be relatable to this?
both encouraged and appalled me