is he an outsider too?

chill dudette

stop i love him

calm down dude

me when i lie

YES QUEEN

mirai

Life of Muhammad * Had a relatively normal childhood, albeit his parents and close family members passed away and then raised by Abdu' Muttalib, his uncle. Growing up, he became a merchant. * Around the time of Ramadan, and near the age of 40, he received revelations from the arch-angel Gabriel. * Slowly goes public when proclaiming his messages. Meets a lot of resistance from other clans of his tribe, and so begins years of fighting. Muhammad makes polytheists question what Polytheism actually is. * Iconoclasm: Destruction or fight against idols, or icons. (makes sense since Polytheism centers around Idolization). * Muhammad's wife (Khadija) and his uncle, Abdu Talib died in 619. After that, Muhammad undergoes the "Night Journey" from Mecca to Jerusalem in 620. * After returning to Mecca from Jerusalem, Muhammad emigrates to Medina away from the opponent clans in Mecca in 622. After years of fighting, the Quraysh tribe signs a trice in 628. 2 years later, Muhammad's clan conquers Mecca and he dies another 2 years later in 632.

• Monolithic - One simple unit; a big object that has the main characteristics of being comprised of just ONE thing.
• the problem of turning something into that of a monolith is that it creates stereotypes, justifies actions (even bad ones), and it overall just generalizes everything, which dehumanizes people that don't quite partake in the bad side.

The article talked about how your data can still be collected on certain platforms without needing an actual account. The term is called "shadow profile" and companies such as Facebook can create a version of what they think would be your profile based on the information they have already collected by you. This is scary to think because these companies can collect your data without loopholes to get around with consenting.

This is awful. I truly hate that companies can collect data without someone's consent (and frankly, the way privacy policies and daily life are set up I'm not a fan of data collection with consent either). Besides the general terribleness of invading people's privacy, this sort of data collection can get really dangerous really fast. In cases were people need/have abortions or LGBTQ+ identities (as addressed later on the page), people could get seriously hurt if that information was turned over to certain state governments.

Walt Disney's Peter Pan (1953)

Peter Pan calls the lost boys a bunch of "blockheads".

What legislation could be created today to protect people from misinformation on the internet, its it possible under the conditions of a "free market"

This most certainly mirrors todays less regulated media sites where because of the free market you have blatant misinformation spread to the masses for profit and fear mongering.

I find it interesting but not surprised on how social media platforms benefit from collecting users data. It's scary to think about because you never know what information is being collected from these social media platforms. However, this can benefit you if you are a business owner because certain data can help you obtain higher conversion rates. I wonder though, how can social media companies maintain ethical practices when targeting certain demographics because recently I won a class action settlement against Facebook for them selling my data. I feel that these companies should be more transparent of what they are doing with the information they are collecting since these companies are generating alot of revenue from the data.

When we browse many web pages and want to click closer, purchase or explore something on the web page, the website will collect our information. Most are email, name and gender. After I browse the products I want to buy or the places I want to go, hotel information or product discounts will be pushed to me within a few days after data calculation. Assume that when I finish purchasing any product, they will send me an advertisement via email when there is a discount. There are also some unsafe businesses that will disclose our personal information to others. This can cause people a lot of distress, and some may even fall victim to telecom fraud. Therefore, data confidentiality and security are what everyone needs to do.

It has incorrect text.

This 18-credit program is tailored to equip students for an exciting career in the world of web design, and don’t forget that this pathway offers a dynamic opportunity to secure industry-recognized certifications upon graduation.

distributed ledger vs replicated ledger

These look too close to the bullet point, closer than the rest.

This should be removed.

It's 4

I'ts Advanced Networking 1B (0.5)

I'ts Advanced Networking 1A (0.5)

Intro to Networking 1B (0.5)

It's: Intro to Networking 1A (0.5)

It's Computer Maintenance 1A (0.5) and below: Computer Maintenance 1B (0.5)

This text is different. It should be " Sign up for our 18-Credit Career and Technical Program in Network Systems Specialization and get ready for a successful career. This program offers a vibrant pathway to secure industry certifications upon graduation, setting you up for success in this dynamic industry.

the specificity innate to moral critique, as it requires pointing out something specifically wrong with the workings of capitalism, limits the extent to which we can understand capitalism

I'm a bit relieved that the Google categories weren't that accurate for me (makes sense, I try to stay away from as Google as much as I reasonably can be expected to). Still highly uncomfortable with data collection, but at least I can block my ads.

Can you add a combined BTKi group column in this table? Since you matched on the BTKi group vs VenO, that will prob better show the matching variables are similar.

273 here but we should have 275 VenO patients.

Also, at the bottom of the table it says 13% had missing all dose info, but this point says 273 had 400 mg dose at some point in time.

Confirm that pts are exact matched in age category, gender and race. Seems the acalabrutinib arm is different than Ibr and VenO

very accurate statement. Hence why we tend to stick to a certain genre, author, or writing style.

This could be interpreted as writers style, the history, backstory, or overall setting of novel.

Again, pokes at the curious fellows. Makes you wonder what the flowers are for.

ultimatum feel with this line, which does intrigue me.

A risk you have to be willing to take if you want to finish a novel. I've defenietly had a few reads where I regret finishing the book because of its terrible ending.

great description that helps the reader place themselves in the scene. I'm sure most of us have done this at one point or another.

This rumor -making incident reminds me of many Internet celebrities who want to get attention through some things. And they often show a more exciting life than ordinary people, so that more people will pay attention to them. But this is also a waste of public resources.

Christopher Booker's "The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories" proposes that all stories are fundamentally structured around seven archetypal plots, which he describes in detail. The book suggests that regardless of the narrative's complexity, the core essence revolves around these themes, which resonate with psychological and archetypal significance. Booker's analysis took 34 years to complete, reflecting a deep and sustained inquiry into the nature of storytelling. His work connects literary criticism with Jungian psychology, offering insights into how and why stories are central to human experience. The reception to Booker's theory has been mixed, with some praising its innovative approach and depth, while others criticize it for its perceived rigidity and dismissiveness towards modernist narratives that deviate from his identified structures.

I really can’t imagine how sad and painful this family must feel when they see these malicious comments. This behavior is absolutely extremely selfish and has no consideration for other people’s feelings, I suggest the Facebook should strengthen the filtering and review of comments to avoid more malicious comments (trollings) like this.

I remember seeing this gadget going viral on social media because of its comments. The review are funny because they exaggerate the usefulness of gadget and create a funny forum to scroll though. I can see why actions like this might create difficulty for truly interested shoppers who want to see what people actually think about products. It might be hard to root this out using technology, though, as close readers might have a better sense of what to look for.

It is inappropriate for comedians to make jokes using official avatars and names. It's okay to make jokes on the Internet, but using official avatars can lead the public in the wrong direction. This will cause the public to have a wrong understanding. I once changed my avatar to make jokes, but I only used my friends’ avatars to joke among friends. This effect is small-scale and well-explained.

This source discusses the phenomenon of "Dr. Troll," a person who crafts their online identity around the art of trolling. This concept can be seen as a sophisticated form of what Whitney Phillips describes in her excerpt on internet troll sub-culture in Scientific American, where she addresses the troll's engagement with mainstream media to disrupt or mock its narratives. The article in Fast Company illustrates the psychological and social dimensions of trolling, providing a more nuanced view on how trolls might perceive their actions as a form of social commentary or criticism, rather than mere harassment. This additional dimension helps to understand the complexities of online identities and their impact on digital communication ethics.

The wikipedia page details the "subreddit" functionality of reddit. It states that there are approximately "138,000 active subreddits as of 2018". With this fact, I believe there are many subreddits that pertain to specific "patterns" or "norms" that society recognizes. That being said, there are many subreddits that use these patterns to build a community surrounding respect, responsibility, and constructive dialogue, but there are also subreddits that probably do the opposite. There are most definitely subreddits that use these patterns and stereotypes to bring down others, and perpetuate negative stereotypes that are skewed to look negative.

It's pretty common to use satire to get the attention but certain things people joke about doesn't follow principles and ethics.

While satire has long been used as a tool for social commentary and criticism, it is crucial that creators remain sensitive to the historical context and potential impact on affected communities. The impersonation of an FBI agent to make a joke about such a pivotal and grave event as the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. seems to disregard the profound implications and could be seen as tasteless by those who understand the deep resonance of MLK's legacy.

This is my first time hearing about this term. It seems like it is a more subtle form of trolling, aiming to be immersed and pretend to be in the community. They then "sow seeds of doubt" in order to try to act like they are thinking for the benefit of the community but actually aim to spread uneasiness.

Trolling is one of those things that I’ve always wondered about. I’ve always seen it as pointless and a waste of time but I guess there are people who do have that time to waste.

This reminds me of the comments issued by some people on the Internet intentionally with the elements of warfare, the purpose is to arouse people's quarrels. I don't understand what this significance is.

The description of trolling provided highlights a significant and complex issue in the digital age. Trolling disrupts not only individual well-being but also the broader health of online communities. While the tactics described—such as concern trolling and joke reviews—illustrate how trolling can undermine productive discourse, what's particularly insidious about this behavior is its chameleon-like nature; trolls can adapt their strategies as different platforms evolve their moderation tactics.

This raises a pertinent question: how can online communities and platforms develop more sophisticated and adaptive measures to mitigate the negative impacts of trolling without infringing on free speech? Given the evolving nature of online interaction and community norms, this is a challenging balance to strike, particularly when the intent behind posts is not overtly malicious but still disrupts genuine engagement. The ongoing evolution of artificial intelligence in moderating content may provide some solutions, but it also opens up a new set of ethical and practical challenges. What are your thoughts on using AI to identify and manage trolling behavior online?

I'm just curious as to why funny comments with just intentions are classified as troll?

The concept of empowerment derived from trolling is a fascinating and disturbing reflection of human psychology. It's intriguing to consider that the anonymity of the internet can provide a space for individuals to feel a sense of accomplishment through negative actions, such as causing disruption or pain to others. This could be reflective of a deeper sense of powerlessness or frustration in other areas of life.

This phenomenon is particularly acute on the Internet. In real life, for the most part people don't actively mock because the behavior comes with a price. But on the internet, people don't know who you are. Therefore, many people take advantage of the anonymity of the way to taunt each other, thus forming a net explosion.

I think trolling can significantly impact the quality of online discourse and community interactions. While the internet offers vast opportunities for sharing ideas and fostering meaningful connections, trolling undermines these potentials by promoting distrust and conflict. Frequent trolling can deter people from participating in online discussions, limit the exchange of ideas, and can even lead to emotional distress for individuals targeted by such behavior.

Constructive engagement and respectful dialogue are crucial for productive online communities. Trolling not only disrupts these principles but also diminishes the overall experience for users who seek to gain knowledge, offer support, or engage in healthy debate. Encouraging positive interaction and developing strategies to manage and minimize trolling are important steps to enhance the quality and inclusivity of online spaces.

reply to https://www.reddit.com/r/Zettelkasten/comments/1c4kaps/giving_you_notes_a_unique_id_the_debate_continues/kzop2yh/

I'm with you on some of this, but let me play devil's advocate for a moment, so that we might hew closer to the question u/atomicnotes has posed:

If a Dewey Decimal Number is equivalent to a topic heading or subject, then what is the difference between using these subject/category/tag headings and forgoing the work of translating into a DC number (a task which is far less straightforward for those without a library science). If there is a onto to one and onto correspondence there should mathematically be no difference.

And how does one treat insightful material on geometry (516), for example, which comes from a book classified about political science (320-329)?

In a similar vein, why not use Otlet's Universal Decimal Classification which more easily allows for the admixture of topics as well as time periods?

Separately, I'll echo your valuable statement:

"I think everyone stumbles into a system of their own. I suspect the best practice here is the one that works for you!"

This is the first time I've seen a mention of a Cutter number in the zettelkasten space.

I've always appreciated this serendipity, but never read a source talking about it specifically.

Do you want to add Instructor EID/UIN and Instruction Type is NULL for 2918 records.

If filtering to CCYYS >=20169, the NULLs will be 0.

I don't understand. Please revise.

see previous

patients with hemiplegia--first person language

spell out

Spell out

Spell out aconym

Put TA in parentheses here

Check previous comment--copy the title from the certificate.

Personally, I think the best course of action when encountering trolls on the internet is to not engage with them or offer them no attention. Particularly with the more obvious forms of trolling, I think it is important to report them if you see them, but also not engage with them as trolling becomes more successful when people make the reactions that trollers are aiming for.

spell out

It's fascinating to see how trolling behavior predates the internet era, from hazing to satire. The concept of "lulz" and causing distress for amusement has deep roots in human history, as highlighted by the quote from Bion of Borysthenes. It makes me wonder about the psychology behind such behavior and how it manifests differently in various contexts throughout history.

I think this behavior is an extremely bad behavior. Some players who have been playing for a long time rely on bullying new players to satisfy their bad taste. But they never thought that they were once novice players. I have also encountered these situations but I did not bully and taunt new players after becoming a master. I think the Internet environment should be peaceful and friendly.

I remember watching pranks when I was younger on YouTube, they were very popular back then and actually funny. Nowadays most pranks are not as funny and fake.

typo

It is interesting that this decision was made before any cable regulation by the FCC occured.

Small towns needed cable to receive signals from far away communication hubs like New York, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles. The cable industry built itself on the needs of Americans who weren't as considered by broadcast.

Cable began as its own system entirely. In todays age, the topic of broadcast is almost synonymous with cable, though they are still separate things. They have grown closer together throughout time.

Cable was not accessible by everyone, where as UHF could reach every household. The BBC values public access, so they value the system that can reach more of the public.

Cable wasn't the most technologically advanced, but had appeal based on legal regulations. UHF made broadcast more transmissible with better reception, and cable was expensive.

Cable could have been its own thing entirely, but FCC regulations and favor towards broadcasting diminished its potential.

I completely agree with this assessment of stereotypes. I believe the way in which we use these patterns and norms determines how just or unjust the stereotype may be. recognizing a pattern in society can be used to address underlying issues in society, especially things that disproportionately affect certain groups of people. But on the other hand, many people use these patterns to bash and hate on groups of people.

This is a general statement. Can you provide one specific example, perhaps related to a client or caregiver?

I don't understand this--please rewrite for clarity.

I finished reading this chapter and also like it a lot as it's shaping up! My biggest comments are 1) to connect two of the sections more explicitly, and 2) my remaining concerns about the learning styles section. I would still prefer to introduce the idea of styles as a historical notion that has been critiqued but also that still has considerable value if we think more in terms of learning preferences. I think this could just be more explicitly addressed.

spell out

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D002000/ForcedSpirometry

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D008451/MaximalVoluntaryVentilation

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D011653/PulmonaryDiffusingCapacity

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D001985/BronchialProvocationTests

Currently teaching at Auburn College while completing a post doctoral teaching fellow. This is reliable as it is a peer reviewed document from Baylor University.

This chapter had an 'intro' section - should we also have 'outro' sections? This can be part of our discussion about whether to have learning outcomes at the start of the chapter, in which case we could return to those in an outro

Approaches (it's not just one method). Also, change 'communicativism' to 'Communicative'

how does this relate to the purposes of a university? in morse's POV?

where does he do this? more direct textual references needed.

"so what?" relevance?

transition?

refer to specific definition here.

citations needed

which ones?

where is this stated in the speech or its contexts? and relevance to your discussion?

Can you give a specific example? This is very general.

Expand--this is still very vague

This is still very vague. Please provide a specific example.

spelling

The extent of consciousness, and the extent of accommodation: cis women, more accommodated without effort than before, perhaps also less conscious?

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D011653/PulmonaryDiffusingCapacity

can this relate to Rich?

keep this focused on CWRU and its community.

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D011653/PulmonaryDiffusingCapacity

I think this activity works really well!

How the learning happens...?

I think we should connect this section to the section on procedural and declarative knowledge, since explicit learning results in declarative, and implicit learning leads to procedural knowledge (and it is debated whether explicit learning can lead to procedural knowledge). Maybe this section could come after the procedural/declarative one, and more explicitly connect the ideas. Let me check with Volya about getting a good source for this.

cite Shor's examples. AND explain how these are relevant to your reading of this material?

how is all of this summary or synopsis of Shor relevant to your discussions? to you chosen critical concept?

cite paraphrased material.

new paragraph?

nice. is this from Shor too? any of it?

excellent use of the reading to set this idea up early.

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/000070857/WalkTest

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/000070857/WalkTest

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D001985/BronchialProvocationTests

spell out for the first itme

spell out

Capitalize

third

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D000089142/FractionalExhaledNitricOxideTesting

Nelson Mandela's life was filled with the struggle for freedom and equality. For a long time, he supported the abolition of apartheid and tried to promote reconciliation between different racial groups. His difficult journey from the countryside to becoming the first black president of South Africa is also a reflection of his dignity and endurance. It reflects his dedication to democracy and social justice despite the odds and social pressures. Mandela's legacy continues to inspire those who struggle for a fair and equitable world

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D000089142/FractionalExhaledNitricOxideTesting

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D011653/PulmonaryDiffusingCapacity

Proyecto "Anotación PFR"

https://github.com/lmichan/PFR

pfr/DocumentoClave

TipoDePrueba/mesh/D002000/ForcedSpirometry TipoDePrueba/mesh/D000072277/MaximalRespiratoryPressures

the meaning of this is not so clear to me

what has he been up to since then?

poetry, is in fact alive and ever-changing.

be more clear what is being said here, e.g. that whether you are enjoying procedural or relying on declarative, it's all part of the learning process

I wonder if we should include a paragraph here about the fact that it is still debated whether declarative knowledge can actually become procedural, or whether these systems are developed in parallel.

can there be a way to tell the reader which of the 3 is which kind, to help them confirm?

...which you had to explicitly learn at some point. I'm actually wondering if this could also be considered procedural if it was learned through massive reading exposure. I could ask Volya, our faculty member who is an expert on this.

The 'yore' question is not allowing me to put any choices in the box.

I wonder if this should be moved up to be right after the H5P, to help the reader understand how the exercise was about procedural knowledge. Also I think it should include that word order was not something that was ever taught explicitly to us.

about typical English word order?

Instead of 'correct' in the H5P below, could it be 'most typical'? I'm also thinking just 5 max would be enough? They are funny indeed. Did you make them up?

On the other hand? This sentence was confusing for me at first because it was a sudden switch back to procedural

Ideally this would be two smaller paragraphs somehow

I think we should rephrase this, unless you have seen it talked about this way as 'parts'. How is it talked about in the sources?

We will need to decide how to show specific authorship of sections. In other books I have seen this done at the end of the chapter, but it could be done at the front too.

where?

where does he say this?

where? textual support

where? refer to specific textual examples. this needs to be more grounded in his speech.

Morse

Morse

mispelled.

this kind of "ackshually I rise above the tension you've identified" is shit basis for any kind of political change

where in Shor? Morse? your issue/group/event? this sounds like Freire but you do not discuss him. this page needs a lot of attention

you do not have enough Shor on this page to support these readings of CWRU. This page should be about Shor, CL and a specific critical concept. These can be invoked and referred to in other conversations, but need to be very clearly stated and referred to here.

where does he say this?

citation. ALSO consider using Shor's own words to support this claim.

start with Shor then bring in Morse. OR do Shor here and bring Morse in on the Morse page.

? how does this relate to any of your previous ideas here? integrate this more directly.

refer to the text to make these points.

what does he say? refer to his actual words as you build on this point.

citation

citation needed.

what is this? define it before you build on it.

?

there is no media on the page. revise and include a line

Amen.

new idea, new paragraph. this is buried as you have it. these pages still need organization and focus

put earlier as it starts to define the problem.

describe the problem before you get into solution territory. This is the page where you need to describe what is at play with your chosen issue/group/event.

because...

available campus jobs

what is this? you have yet to define or describe it.

what? name it.

what do you mean? connect to Freire AND Morse.

again, show this before you make claims about it.

directly connect this to Morse. it is out of place here (and unasked for in this page so Freire needs even more contextualization).

than who? expand this description of debate and academic freedoms.

use his words to make this point. at the very least, include a citation of hwere you are paraphrasing this from.

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/apr/13/swiss-climate-ruling-global-impact-european-court-human-rights

state earlier and work from here as you define your discourse community and its problems you will engage in.

fix your media link

why? what do they bring that is so important? state this THEN how it is vital.

cut and replace with specific ideas rooted in specifci textual ideas from Freire.

but how is this change at all? confusing. revise.

where? how? relevance to your immediate point?

revise quote set ups to reflect quote content. try what we have been taught this term.

these are not historical observations as much as they are proposals for change. revise framing.

citations needed for paraphrased material.

where does he say this? I think your rendering of Freire's contexts is wrong.

we didn't read the whole book. and at least refer to it by its name if you want ti invoke where the Baking Method section came from.

this needs to be revised for precision and accuracy, the paradigm of good/bad here does little to develop or explain an claim.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/15/great-barrier-reef-coral-bleaching-global-heating

imprecise and irrelevant description. revise for precision and clarity.

where does it show this? why is this relevant? to what idea in this page?

replace with content to set up what you will discuss. we all know this si a quote from the speech. but we don't know what it is saying and what it is speaking to.

?

"different" and "bad" do not convey anything to your reader. different from what to what? bad in comparison to what? again, this is VERY VAGUE and such imprecision is problematic as you are trying to make a point about Morse and his perception of the role of universities.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/14/grownup-leaders-are-pushing-us-towards-catastrophe-says-former-us-climate-chief

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/15/climate-crisis-deadly-ocean-upswells-cold-water-study

We will be introducing everyone in the front matter, right?