5,590 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2026
    1. The Semantic Reader project [43] supports features that bring information from related papers into the focal paper’s reading environment. For example, Relatedly [54], part of the Semantic Reader project, highlights unexplored dissimilar information in related work sections of unread papers while low-lighting previously seen information.

      sentence related to color

    2. The Positional Diction Clustering (PDC) algorithm identified analogous sentences across many LLM responses, which were reified both as color-coordinated cross-document analogous text highlighting (like ParaLib) and in a novel ‘interleaved’ view where analogous sentences across documents were rendered in adjacent rows to enable more easy comparison [18].

      sentence related to color

    3. AbstractExplorer instantiates new minimally lossy2 SMT-informed techniques for skimming, reading, and reasoning about a corpus of similarly structured short documents: phrase-level role classification that drives sentence ordering, highlighting, and spatial alignment.

      sentence related to any theory

    4. Structural Mapping Theory (SMT) is a long-standing well-vetted theory from Cognitive Science that describes how humans attend to and try to compare objects by finding mental representations of them that can be structurally mapped to each other (analogies).

      sentence related to any theory

    5. In the context of close reading of research paper abstracts at scale, our findings suggest AbstractExplorer enabled participants to scale up the number of papers they could review through efficient skimming and find common patterns and outliers through sentence comparison, resulting in a rich synthesis of ideas and connections to foster deeper engagement with scholarly articles.

      sentence relating to methodology

    6. We extend existing approaches through automated role annotation, establishing alignments using grammatical chunk boundaries, and preserving sentences in their entirety, instead of relying on abstract meta-data.

      sentence relating to methodology

    7. In this work, we introduce a new paradigm for exploring a large corpus of small documents by identifying roles at the phrasal and sentence levels, then slice on, reify, group, and/or align the text itself on those roles, with sentences left intact.

      sentence relating to methodology

    8. Custom aspects are generated dynamically via API calls to a FastAPI back-end, which prompts an LLM to check whether each sentence in the filtered subset matches the aspect description—either in terms of overall content or a matching token—and extracts the most relevant chunk of that sentence to highlight.

      sentence relating to methodology

    9. After obtaining an expanded set of high-level chunk labels, we assign them to each of the sentence chunks by using LLMs in a multi-class classification few-shot learning task, with the initial labels and assignment as examples.

      sentence relating to methodology

    10. After identifying chunk boundaries, we again prompt an LLM to generate labels for chunks in a human-in-the-loop approach: starting from an initial set of labels for chunk roles, when a new label is generated, a researcher from the research team examines the new label and merges it with existing labels if appropriate, controlling for the total number of labels.

      sentence relating to methodology

    11. In the first stage, Sentence Segmentation and Categorization, abstracts are split into individual sentences using the NLTK package, and each sentence is classified into one of the five pre-defined aspects as listed in Section 4.1.1.

      sentence relating to methodology

    12. When users click on a bookmark icon to the left of any specific sentence in the Cross-Sentences Relationships Pane, that sentence is added to a bookmark list that can be viewed in the Bookmarked Sentences alternate pane.

      sentence relating to methodology

    13. Filtering enables users to narrow their focus to a subset of the corpus while still benefiting from features that help them recognize cross-sentence relationships within the remaining abstracts.

      sentence relating to methodology

    14. The Abstracts panel can be customized by users to display the full abstract text, an abstract “TLDR” (a shorter abstractive summary generated by an LLM), or both at the same time.

      sentence relating to methodology

    15. To allow users to contextualize individual sentences within their respective abstracts, we link the Cross-Sentence Relationship and Abstract panels: when users click on any sentence in the Cross-Sentence Relationships pane, the corresponding full abstract is automatically highlighted and scrolled into view in the Abstracts panel, offering additional context when needed.

      sentence relating to methodology

    16. Together, the vertical and horizontal juxtapositions are designed to help users identify both high-level commonalities and nuanced variations across structurally similar sentences.

      sentence relating to methodology

    17. These alignment options are intended to enable users to more easily read analogous chunks across sentences from different abstracts, ignoring details serving other roles within the sentence.

      sentence relating to methodology

    18. By default, sentences are vertically aligned by the middle of their shared structure tuple, but users can freely switch between the three alignment options using the button group atop the Cross-Sentence Relationship pane.

      sentence relating to methodology

    19. AbstractExplorer also aligns the sentences in three different ways, as illustrated in Figure 5: vertical alignment by the middle of the structure tuple (second element), vertical alignment by the left of the structure tuple (first element), and left-justified alignment (horizontal juxtapositions).

      sentence relating to methodology

    20. This ordering prioritizes dominant structural patterns (largest groups first) while exposing fine-grained variations (via length-sorted triplets), mirroring how humans compare sentences, if SMT is an accurate description in this domain of comparative close reading.

      sentence relating to methodology

    21. This allows users to first understand the different structure patterns and their commonality, before diving into close reading at scale of the sentences that share a particular structure by clicking any of the “Expand” toggles.

      sentence relating to methodology

    22. AbstractExplorer first segments sentences into grammar-preserving chunks—segments that respect grammatical boundaries, i.e., an LLM judges that the sentence can be truncated at that chunk boundary without breaking the grammatical integrity of the preceding text.

      sentence relating to methodology

    23. Viewing one aspect at a time enables users to closely read and compare just the analogous sentences of abstracts, which may be cognitively easier than the comparative close reading of many abstracts in their entirety, especially if cross-sentence relationships are pre-computed and reified in the interface.

      sentence relating to methodology

    24. AbstractExplorer classifies sentences into five pre-defined aspects common in CHI abstracts: Problem Domain, Gaps in Prior Work, Methodology/Contribution, Results/Findings, and Discussion/Conclusion.

      sentence relating to methodology

    25. We chose the sentence as our unit for cross-document alignment because: (1) it preserves complete propositional content (unlike phrases or words), (2) maintains grammatical coherence when isolated (unlike arbitrary text spans), and (3) serves as the minimal self-contained unit where aspects can be meaningfully compared.

      sentence relating to methodology

    26. To keep details at the forefront of the interface, we designed a mechanism to slice abstracts for viewing them from specific angles, allowing for comparative close reading at scale at the sentence level.

      sentence relating to methodology

    27. ABSTRACTEXPLORER is designed to help researchers (1) skim, read, and better familiarize themselves with the contents and composition style of a large corpus of abstracts and (2) reason about cross-paper relationships at scale without abstracting away the author-written sentences about their own work.

      sentence relating to methodology

    28. Finally, a summative study (Section 6) describes how researchers used ABSTRACTEXPLORER to familiarize themselves with a corpus of ~1000 CHI paper abstracts—reading across a larger and more diverse collection of abstracts and more easily discerning relationships and distributions across prior work.

      sentence relating to methodology

    29. Second, an ablation study with eye-tracking (Section 5) revealed that the three key features of ABSTRACTEXPLORER's central cross-sentence relationships pane-sentence order, role-coordinated highlighting, and alignment-work best in concert, not alone.

      sentence relating to methodology

    30. Three studies inform and validate ABSTRACT EXPLORER's design: First, a formative study (Section 3) suggested unmet needs and interest in our approach to supporting cross-document reasoning.

      sentence relating to methodology

    31. AbstractExplorer instantiates new minimally lossy SMT-informed techniques for skimming, reading, and reasoning about a corpus of similarly structured short documents: phrase-level role classification that drives sentence ordering, highlighting, and spatial alignment.

      sentence relating to methodology

    32. A summative study (N=16) describes how these features support users in familiarizing themselves with a corpus of paper abstracts from a single large conference with over 1000 papers.

      sentence relating to methodology

    33. AbstractExplorer has a unique combination of LLM-powered (1) faceted comparative close reading with (2) role highlighting enhanced by (3) structure-based ordering and (4) alignment.

      sentence relating to methodology

    34. In this work, we introduce a new paradigm for exploring a large corpus of small documents by identifying roles at the phrasal and sentence levels, then slice on, reify, group, and/or align the text itself on those roles, with sentences left intact.

      please find me the main contributions of this paper

    35. AbstractExplorer instantiates new minimally lossy SMT-informed techniques for skimming, reading, and reasoning about a corpus of similarly structured short documents: phrase-level role classification that drives sentence ordering, highlighting, and spatial alignment.

      please find me the main contributions of this paper

    36. AbstractExplorer has a unique combination of LLM-powered (1) faceted comparative close reading with (2) role highlighting enhanced by (3) structure-based ordering and (4) alignment. An ablation study (N=24) validated that these features work best together. A summative study (N=16) describes how these features support users in familiarizing themselves with a corpus of paper abstracts from a single large conference with over 1000 papers.

      please find me the main contributions of this paper

    37. We contribute: • Novel SMT theory-informed text analysis and rendering techniques for enabling cross-document skimming and comparative close reading at scale • AbstractExplorer, which instantiates these techniques for familiarizing oneself with a corpus of ∼1000 CHI paper abstracts. • Three studies informing and evalutaing the benefits, challenges, and interactions between these techniques.

      please find me the main contributions of this paper

    38. The ablation and summative studies verified the value of Abstract-Explorer, specifically showing that all three components of the Structural Mapping Engine—color coding, sentence ordering, and vertical alignment—are crucial for facilitating comparative close reading at scale.

      sentence relating to testing

    39. The study concluded with a 15-minute semi-structured interview. During the interview, participants saw screenshots from the three conditions and were asked which they preferred and disliked, why, what they wished the interface had, what influenced their skimming, and how they normally skimmed texts.

      sentence relating to testing

    40. After the ablation study validated the effectiveness of all three SMT-inspired features together (especially for lower NFC users), we completed the implementation of AbstractExplorer and eval-uated its impact on researchers’ reading and sensemaking of a corpus of all ∼1000 paper abstracts from ACM CHI 2024.

      sentence relating to testing

    41. The most preferred condition (all three features enabled) was tied with the baseline no-features-enabled condition for lowest reported cognitive load. Specifically, 11 participants reported their lowest raw NASA-TLX scores8 in the all-three-features condition, and a different 11 participants reported their lowest raw NASA-TLX scores in the baseline condition.

      sentence relating to testing

    1. An appealing alternative to conventional text-based interfaces through graphical user interfaces is the direct use of hands as an input device to provide natural human-computer interaction.

      sentence about GUIs

    2. A more thorough description of the current tools and techniques for interacting with computers as well as recent developments in the subject is provided in the next section.

      sentence about GUIs

    3. The evolving multi-modal and Graphical user interfaces (GUI) enable humans to interact with embodied character agents in a way that is not possible with other interface paradigms.

      sentence about GUIs

    4. The widely used graphical user interfaces (GUI) of today are found in desktop applications, internet browsers, mobile computers, and computer kiosks.

      sentence about GUIs

    Tags

    Annotators