Will deciphering it ever be possible? Are there other ways of understanding a language other than translating from another known language?

What are "Vedic" sources?

for - climate change impacts - marine life - citizen-science - potential project - climate departure - ocean heating impacts - marine life - marine migration - migrating species face collapse - migration to escape warming oceans - population collapse

main research findings - Study involved 146 species of temperate or subpolar fish and 2,572 time series - Extremely fast moving species (17km/year) showed large declines in population while - fish that did not shift showed negligible decline - Those on the northernmost edge experienced the largest declines - There is speculation that the fastest moving ones are the also the one's with the least evolutionary adaptations for new environments

Error code description:

Faulty data communication to the middle fan motor on floor units and the bottom fan motor on 10 tray table top units.

Condition for error detection:

BUS signal from middle fan motor on floor units and the bottom fan motor on 10 tray table top units is missing or is not transmitted for at least 5 seconds at a time.

Error area:

Data transfer cable, control electronics for middle fan motor on floor units and the bottom fan motor on 10 tray table top units

Relevant causes/components:

• eSTL has initialised
• Electrical connection to components
• Control electronics for middle fan motor

Fan motor bottom on floor units

Fan motor bottom for table top units.

Fan motor middle for floor units

Always the top fan motor

For SCC / SCC 5 Senses and SCCWE,

If more than one bus member was faulty, Bus error messages were added up, for example; if both top and bottom motors were faulty and not communicating with the Bus Master, Service 34-1 and Service 34.2 were added to provide a Service 34.3 error message. (1+2=3).

For the iCombi series each bus member fault is shown individually and in the above cercumstance both Service 34.1 and Service 34.2 would be shown as error codes.

Mains frequency not detected

False connection detection Low limit

False connection detection - High Limit

Capactive button malfunction.

230Vac output only on gas models which is used to supply the gas ignition controller but only when K1 contactor energisese after ESTL checks.

240Vac supply to A13 pump board iCombi Pro and Classic

240Vac supply to A18 pump board for iCombi XS units.

The iCombi Pro XS does not have the new A13 as it still has the original hardware from index I (i.e. Drain valve, SC pump, Care pump, CleanJet pump). Therefore it needs a special pump adapter pcb A18 to be able to control the older hardware with the new A10 I/O board.

X70 M5 cooling fan output 12Vdc.

With the exception of iCombiPro XS and CMP XS, the cooling fan M5 is controlled by the CPU and depends on temperatures on several pcbs and the fan motor/s.

With all electric and gas units 6-1/1 to 10-2/1 M5 is located at the bottom right hand corner of the electrical compartment directly above the air filter.

With all electric and gas floor units M5 is located at the bottom right hand corner of the electrical compartment directly above the air filter.

iCombi Pro XS. The cooling fan M5 is controlled by the temperature of B10 thermocouple in the electrical compartment; B10 is located behind the inverter of M1 fan motor and connected to A10, X6, Pins 3, 4.

With iCombi Pro XS units M5 is located at the bottom right hand corner of the electrical compartment directly above the air filter.

X59 6.8V Power supply to Door LED arrays

X51 is a 12 pole female connector from which a 12 core cable carries data to and from all Bus members.

The 12 wire cable also caries a 5V "stand by" voltage from I/O board A10 to CPU (A11 iCombi Pro) and the ICP capacitor switch pcb (A19).

The "stand by" voltage enables operation of the capacitor on/off switch and the CPU as soon as power is supplied to the oven (as the isolator is switched on).

When the capacitor switch is operated, ESTL completes its safety checks and providing no high temperature errors or component errors exist, contactor K1 energises and a 12 V supply is also sent to the CPU via this connector and its associated cable.

Data Highway for communications between CPU and all Bus members.

for - thermal battery - off-the-shelf

for - Cities 1.5 podcast - guests - Xuemei Bai - earth system boundaries downscaled to cities - cross-scale translation of earth system boundaries

for - futures - transition - social commons design

an academic conference or seminar

the excessive display of concern or distress

violent or extreme disorder; chaos: complete mayhem broke out | thousands of supporters tried to force their way into the stadium, causing mayhem.

determined to achieve something at all costs: she's hell-bent on leaving.

I like how this guy says "Ok" or "Ok, let's go" each time he goes back from commentary on the lines to the show.

VId

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/aug/08/repeating-climate-denial-claims-makes-them-seem-more-credible-australian-led-study-finds

1:01:00 Rian Doris was into quantified self in his late teens

Also see other episode where Connor Murphy shared that same interest

Vid

For true deep processing and learning, intellectualism, one must think beyond the single source they are consuming and think about everything they know. Although keep in mind selective attention for true learning and thinking.

This process is habitualized by means of Zettelkasten and further aided in tool like hypothes.is

Love this guy's facial expressions while reacting.

VId

Losing to evil intentions is indeed a big problem in the world. Thanks for your comment, Import Reaction Video.

Philosophy & religion should inherently be taught in education, which would partially solve this problem. Ethics. Morality.

Patience reaction video

Is it going to be possible to annotate with Zotero for web?

Interesting perspective as interpretation where Jack says at the moment the song says "Who made up words, who made up numbers? Who wrote the Bible, who wrote the Q'uran" it might not even be a call to reflect and think for yourself (although this is absolutely a recurring theme in the song) but maybe they are implying all the science traces back not to the West (Europe) but to the East (Egypt, Africa). This interpretation aligns with the album this song was produced in, which is about Africa.

Patience reaction video

54:50 "getting things done" is used in productivity vocabulary, not necessarily tied to the methodology "GTD". It signifies to produce and do stuff, which seemingly falls well on the tongue?

All true knowledge remains with God. There are certain ideas & pieces of knowledge that men just cannot learn. It remains out of reach, out of touch.

Also an interpreted theme in the song.

Apparently the mali chorus means: "Patience patience patience, is worth everything."

Reaction vid on patience

via u/guneeyoufix at https://new.reddit.com/r/typewriters/comments/1amo13f/cheap_ribbons_for_uk_typists/

Philly Typewriter starts a trade school by [[Richard Polt]]

This is interesting, but 4 years? This seems like a 1-2 year thing at best.

Damn this intro is superb.

Reaction vid of pateinec

The song's criticism on mass media is mainly related to sensationalism.

"Good" things are usually not sensational. They do not demand attention, hence why the code of known/unknown based on selectors for attention filters it out.

Reference Hans-Georg Moeller's explanations of Luhmann's mass media theory based on functionally differentiated systems theory.

Can also compare to Simone Weil's thoughts on collectives and opinion; organizations (thus most part of mass media) should not be allowed to form opinions as this is an act of the intellect, only residing in the individual. Opinion of any form meant to spread lies or parts of the truth rather than the whole truth should be disallowed according to her because truth is a foundational, even the most sacred, need for the soul.

People must be protected against misinformation.

Patience reaction vid

Reaction vid on patience

On a general level, the song is not just about criticizing society, but also about stimulating independence... and not just in thought and identity, but in everything.

Don't be dependent on external factors.

Unrelated to the song itself. It is interesting that different people interpret the song's meaning differently. Likely due to individual differences in perspective, history, culture, etc.

Makes me reflect. Is knowledge/wisdom contained solely in content and words? Or is knowledge/wisdom rather contained in the RELATIONSHIP, the INTERACTION, between past experience, previous knowledge (identity) and substance?

Currently I am inclined to go for the latter.

The idea of growing wiser vs. growing tall is likely not meant for the individual but for society as a whole or the world at large. The full context of the song. But it might have double meaning and refer to both individual and society.

Reminds me of Taleb's concept of Epistemic Arrogance (overvaluing that which we know)

Songwriters don't criticize keeping zoo animals. They criticize prioritizing the zoo animals over the youth/humans (take in the full context bro)... Prioritize money over humanity.

Reaction vid to patience

Established in 1970, and located in the heart of Albuquerque, N.M., Sunwest Silver Co., Inc. is your comprehensive industry source, providing for your needs from the mines up.

Lmao, love how this guy is casually smoking a cigar.

Patience reaction vid

Must not just have patience in general, but also patience with people.

Patience reaction vid

Reaction vid to pateince

Off-topic, this guy looks really good for his age.

Patience reaction vid

Reaction video on "Patience"

Editors Assessment:

RAD-Seq (Restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing) is a cost-effective method for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery and genotyping. In this study the authors performed a kinship analysis and pedigree reconstruction for two different cattle breeds (Angus and Xiangxi yellow cattle). A total of 975 cattle, including 923 offspring with 24 known sires and 28 known dams, were sampled and subjected to SNP discovery and genotyping using RAD-Seq. Producing a SNP panel with 7305 SNPs capturing the maximum difference between paternal and maternal genome information, and being able to distinguish between the F1 and F2 generation with 90% accuracy. Peer review helped highlight better the practical applications of this work. The combination of the efficiency of RNA-seq and advances in kinship analysis here can helpfully help improve breed management, local resource utilization, and conservation of livestock.

This evaluation refers to version 1 of the preprint

This work has been published in GigaByte Journal under a CC-BY 4.0 license (https://doi.org/10.46471/gigabyte.131), and has published the reviews under the same license. These are as follows.

Reviewer 1. Liyun wan

Is there sufficient detail in the methods and data-processing steps to allow reproduction?

The detailed parameters for the SNP and InDel calling should be described to allow reproduction.

Additional Comments:

This research provides valuable insights into the use of RAD-Seq to kinship analysis and pedigree reconstruction, which is useful for breeding and animal conservation purposes. Overall, the study is well-conducted and the findings are relevant. However, there are a few aspects that require attention before the manuscript can be considered for publication. Please address the following points: 1. Provide practical applications: Highlight the practical applications of your research in livestock management, breed improvement, local resource utilization, and conservation. Discuss how the low-cost and efficient SNP panel can contribute to these areas and provide suggestions for further research or implementation. 2. Language and clarity: Review the manuscript for clarity, grammar, and sentence structure. Ensure that all key terms and concepts are defined and explained to facilitate understanding for a broad readership. Once these revisions have been made, I believe the manuscript will be much stronger and suitable for publication.

Reviewer 2. Mohammad Bagher Zandi

Is the language of sufficient quality?

Yes. It was great.

Are all data available and do they match the descriptions in the paper?

Yes. The raw sequencing reads were deposited but it would be better to share the the SNPs data as well.

Is the data acquisition clear, complete and methodologically sound?

No. SNPs detection and SNPs selection for assignment test is not clear.

Is there sufficient detail in the methods and data-processing steps to allow reproduction?

No. In some cases, the materials and methods section is vague. It is better to correct them. It is mentioned in the attached manuscript text.

Additional Comments: Well done research, but the manuscript need some correction as commented on the attached file. See: https://gigabyte-review.rivervalleytechnologies.comdownload-api-file?ZmlsZV9wYXRoPXVwbG9hZHMvZ3gvRFIvNTA1L2dpZ2EtY29tZW50cy5kb2N4

Blair, R J R. “Considering Anger from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science 3, no. 1 (October 19, 2011): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.154.

‌

Editors Assessment: This work is part of a series of papers from the Hong Kong Biodiversity Genomics Consortium sequencing the rich biodiversity of species in Hong Kong (see https://doi.org/10.46471/GIGABYTE_SERIES_0006). This example assembles the genome of the black-faced spoonbill (Platalea minor), an emblematic wading bird from East Asia that is classified as globally endangered by the IUCN. This Data Release reporting a 1.24Gb chromosomal-level genome assembly produced using a combination of PacBio SMRT and Omni-C scaffolding technologies. BUSCO and Merqury validation were carried out, gene models created, and peer reviewers also requested MCscan synteny analysis. This showed the genome assembly had high sequence continuity with scaffold length N50=53 Mb. Presenting data from 14 individuals this will hopefully be a useful and valuable resources for future population genomic studies aimed at better understanding spoonbill species numbers and conservation.

*This evaluation refers to version 1 of the preprint *

This work is part of a series of papers presenting outputs of the Hong Kong Biodiversity Genomics https://doi.org/10.46471/GIGABYTE_SERIES_0006 This work has been published in GigaByte Journal under a CC-BY 4.0 license (https://doi.org/10.46471/gigabyte.130), and has published the reviews under the same license. These are as follows.

Reviewer 1. Richard Flamio Jr.

Is the language of sufficient quality?

No. There are some grammatical errors and spelling mistakes throughout the text.

Is there sufficient detail in the methods and data-processing steps to allow reproduction?

Yes. The authors did a phenomenal job at detailing the methods and data-processing steps.

Additional Comments:

Very nice job on the paper. The methods are sound and the statistics regarding the genome assembly are thorough. My only two comments are: 1) I think the paper could be improved by the correction of grammatical errors, and 2) I am interested in a discussion about the number of chromosomes expected for this species (or an estimate) based on related species and if the authors believe all of the chromosomes were identified. For example, is the karyotype known or can the researchers making any inferences about the number of microchromosomes in the assembly? Please see a recent paper I wrote on microchromosomes in the wood stork assembly (https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esad077) for some ideas in defining the chromosome architecture of the spoonbill and/or comparing this architecture to related species.

Re-review:

The authors incorporated the revisions nicely and have produced a quality manuscript. Well done.

Minor revisions Line 46: A comma is needed after (Threskiornithidae). Line 47: “The” should not be capitalized. Line 48: This should read “as a globally endangered species.” Line 49: “However, the lack of genomic resources for the species hinders the understanding of its biology…” Line 56: Consider changing “also revealed” to “identified” to avoid repetition from the previous sentence. Line 65: Insert “the” before “bird’s.” Lines 69-70: Move “locally” higher in the sentence – “and it is protected locally…” Line 72: Replace “as of to date” with “prior to this study”. Lines 78-79: Pluralize “part.” Line 86: Replace “proceeded” with “processed.” Line 133: “…are listed in Table 1.” Line 158: “accounted” Line 159: “Variant calling was performed using…” Line 161: “Hard filtering was employed…” Lines 200-201: “The heterozygosity levels… from five individuals were comparable to previous reports on spoonbills – black-faced spoonbill … and royal spoonbill … (Li et al. 2022).” Line 202: New sentence. “The remaining heterozygosity levels observed…” Line 206: “…genetic bottleneck in the black-faced spoonbill…” Lines 208-209: “These results highlight the need…” Lines 213-214: “…which are useful and precious resources for future population genomic studies aimed at better understanding spoonbill species numbers and conservation.” Line 226: Missing a period after “heterozygosity.” For references, consider adding DOIs. Some citations have them but most citations would benefit from this addition.

Reviewer 2. Phred Benham

Is the language of sufficient quality?

Generally yes, the language is sufficiently clear. However, a number of places could be refined and extra words removed.

Are all data available and do they match the descriptions in the paper?

Additional data is available on figshare.

I do not see any of the tables that are cited in the manuscript and contain legends. Am I missing something. Also there is no legend for the GenomeScope profile in figure 3.

The assembly appears to be on genbank as a scaffold level assembly, can you list this accession info in the data availability section in addition to the project number.

Is there sufficient data validation and statistical analyses of data quality?

Overall fine, but some additional analyses would aid the paper. Comparison of the spoonbill genome to other close relatives using a synteny plot would be helpful.

It would also be useful to put heterozygosity and inbreeding coefficients into context by comparing to results from other species.

Additional Comments:

Hui et al. report a chromosome level genome for the black-faced spoonbill, a endangered species of coastal wetlands in East Asia. This genome will serve as an important genome for understanding the biology of and conserving this species.

Generally, the methods are sound and appropriate for the generation of genomic sequence.

Major comments: This is a highly contiguous genome in line with metrics for Vertebrate Genomics Project genomes and other consortia. The authors argue that they have assembled 31 Pseudo-molecules or chromosomes. It would be nice to see a plot showing synteny of these 31 chromosomes and a closely related species with a chromosome level assembly (e.g. Theristicus caerulescens; GCA_020745775.1)

The tables appear to be missing from the submitted manuscript?

Minor comments: Line 49: delete its

Line 49-51: This sentence is a little awkward, please revise.

Line 64: delete 'the'

Line 67: replace 'with' with 'the spoonbil as a'

Line 68: delete 'Interestingly'

Line 70: can you be more specific about what kind of genetic methods had previously been performed?

Line 79: can you provide any additional details on the necessary permits and/or institutional approval

Line 78: what kind of tissue? or were these blood samples?

Line 110: do you mean movies?

Line 143: replace data with dataset

Line 163: it may be worth applying some additional filters in vcftools, e.g. minor allele freq., min depth, max depth, what level of missing data was allowed?, etc.

Line 171: delete 'resulted in'

Line 172: do you mean scaffold L50 was 8? Line 191-195: some context would be useful here, how does this level of heterozygosity and inbreeding compare to other waterbirds?

Line 217: why did you use the Metazoan database and not the Aves_odb10 database for Busco?

Figure 1b: Number refers to what, scaffolds? Be consistent with capitalization for Mb. It seems like the order of scaffold N50 and L50 were reversed.

Figure 3 is missing a legend. Hui et al. report a chromosome level genome for the black-faced spoonbill, a endangered species of coastal wetlands in East Asia. This genome will serve as an important genome for understanding the biology of and conserving this species.

Generally, the methods are sound and appropriate for the generation of genomic sequence.

Major comments: This is a highly contiguous genome in line with metrics for Vertebrate Genomics Project genomes and other consortia. The authors argue that they have assembled 31 Pseudo-molecules or chromosomes. It would be nice to see a plot showing synteny of these 31 chromosomes and a closely related species with a chromosome level assembly (e.g. Theristicus caerulescens; GCA_020745775.1)

The tables appear to be missing from the submitted manuscript?

Minor comments: Line 49: delete its

Line 49-51: This sentence is a little awkward, please revise.

Line 64: delete 'the'

Line 67: replace 'with' with 'the spoonbil as a'

Line 68: delete 'Interestingly'

Line 70: can you be more specific about what kind of genetic methods had previously been performed?

Line 79: can you provide any additional details on the necessary permits and/or institutional approval

Line 78: what kind of tissue? or were these blood samples?

Line 110: do you mean movies?

Line 143: replace data with dataset

Line 163: it may be worth applying some additional filters in vcftools, e.g. minor allele freq., min depth, max depth, what level of missing data was allowed?, etc.

Line 171: delete 'resulted in'

Line 172: do you mean scaffold L50 was 8? Line 191-195: some context would be useful here, how does this level of heterozygosity and inbreeding compare to other waterbirds?

Line 217: why did you use the Metazoan database and not the Aves_odb10 database for Busco?

Figure 1b: Number refers to what, scaffolds? Be consistent with capitalization for Mb. It seems like the order of scaffold N50 and L50 were reversed.

Figure 3 is missing a legend. Re-review:

I previously reviewed this manuscript and overall the authors have done a nice job addressing all of my comments.

I appreciate that the authors include the MCscan analysis that I suggested. However, the alignment of the P. minor assembly and annotations to other genomes suggests rampant mis-assembly or translocations. Birds have fairly high synteny and I would expect Pmin to look more similar to the comparison between T. caerulescens and M. americana in the MCscan plot. For instance, parts of the largest scaffold in the Pmin assembly map to multiple different chromosomes in the Tcae assembly. Similarly, the Z in Tcae maps to 11 different scaffolds in the Pmin assembly and there does not appear to be a single large scaffold in the Pmin assembly that corresponds to the Z chromosome.

The genome seems to be otherwise of strong quality, so I urge the authors to double-check their MCscan synteny analysis. If this pattern remains, can you please add some comments about it to the end of the Data Validation and Quality Control section? I think other readers will also be surprised at the low levels of synteny apparent between the spoonbill and ibis assemblies.

I wonder how many annotations have been scribbled in the margins of physical books.

Alternatively, I wonder how many digital "annotations" exist only as fleeting thoughts captured by a notes app, removed from the context that created them. The ability to couple thoughts to context is why annotation is powerful.

If we won’t know whether 1 sample = 1 donation I would call that out explicitly.

Looks like we only got SARS reads in two samples. This is a good candidate for validating with BLAST if there's time.

Also noteworthy that we saw a lot of anelloviridae in the Cebria Mendoza RNA MGS paper.

Maybe we have both RNA and DNA stages of anelloviridae get picked up, or maybe the RNA > cDNA sample prep just also got a bunch of anelloviridae DNA in it.

I would highlight/link the Cebria Mendoza paper here.

This is a great addition. I think it would actually be better to use the popular names in the above RA plot as well.

We may also have some data source internally at SB that has a mapping from NCBI taxonomic virus name to common name.

Why exclude Anelloviridae?

I think it would make sense to have a version of this plot with human reads removed as we discussed in the context of Cebria Mendoza paper.

Can the two QC sections be combined or are they stage specific?

I would make this a histogram. You can make two histograms - one for classified reads and one for all reads.

I still think making a histogram is the way to go for this plot

What is p_reads_max?

Your link to the right up here is broken

Your contents here has way too much stuff. Break it into bigger chunks and use subheadings

Citation?

Ah, here it is. Given that you are pulling from the story for an entire paragraph, I'd lead with some reference to this source.

"In their book/article published in XXXX, Jacobs, Burgess, and Abbott tell the tale of...."

Also a short paragraph.

Two sentences isn't much of a paragraph.

factors

the NumPy and Pandas libraries

This is not a complete sentence.

This is not a paragraph

Also not a paragraph

capitalized?

Is this supposed to be above the bullet points? Either way, I think those bullet points need a better intro.

Any section needs to be introduced by text.

I don't think a reader has any idea what this is initially, so this chapter heading is kinda meaningless.

I don't think this table is useful in this current location. As a table, it should be just used as a reference and put at the end of the document.It is a nice summary table, for sure, but it doesn't belong smack in the middle of your paper.

As far as a reader knowing what you are referring to when you use one of these terms, some you can probably safely assume you can use without explanation, and others you should bake the explanation into your text when you introduce it.

Text should introduce every section.

Not a complete sentence

Why is this part of the ML AQI Time Series chapter? Or chapter/heading hierarchy is extremely confusing in general

This feels more like how this section should be starting.

So what did you collect?

This feels outside the scope of what you are doing though correct?

These sections are too small for their own sections. Just make them their own paragraphs.

EDIT: Actually, some of the later ones are more reasonable. Think about how you can balance between them though. Can you add to some to make it more reasonable as a section? Or remove from others? Maybe bullet points with a bolded starting line would be more appropriate?

aggregated

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

It also seems to leave out what I'd guess is probably easily the most significant transit factor: cars and trucks?

was last updated on

Just selecting and renaming wouldn't reduce the information, unless you are trying to say that you didn't bring in anything else.

remove

You should explain why you did this. Otherwise breaking it out into a table of essentially 1 data column seems pointless. I'm pretty sure I recall the reason why, and it is a decent reason, but that is not apparent here.

that is not shown in your ERD

Ok, but I'm pretty sure this totally undid any of the space saving measures you gained with putting dates in their own table. Because you are including a massive number of duplicate items in your main table. You could have just left them separate and still joined by truncating the date to a year and matching that + location

Should probably describe these, since they aren't apparent in the ERD at all.

Reference these properly in Quarto. (It will also make your life easier)

You need a much more comprehensive caption here.

EDA is what you do to narrow down what actual analysis you want or need to do to answer your question. It probably should not be shown here unless mandatory for understanding a later piece of analysis.

Wat? Why is this here in this form?

Yeah, that's not a section, nor should it be. Mistake with #?

This is a paper, not notes of what was done. You need to explain these and describe what was done. A flowchart might also be very useful.

Again, no need for this to be here. It contributes nothing to your story. Or if it does, you need to do a MUCH better job of making that clear. You can mention and link it in an appendix if you want.

Mangled formatting.

Probably also shouldn't be here, though it depends on what you mean by this.

Mangled formatting

Ok, but I haven't seen you talk about any of these yet. So what use then were they toward answering your overall question?

Why is this a chapter? How is it contributing? Like it might be useful information for your question, but a chapter all by itself?

Again, wasn't all of this covered in the background?

Should have already established this in your background.

mangled formatting I think

Figure appears before reference and explanation in text.

Also, figure isn't actually a figure and has no caption.

Also, plot is WAY too big for writeup

Same issues as above figure: - Not explained in text - Not an actual figure with caption and reference - Way too large for the format

You must? That is the only possible approach?

And you seemingly concluded nothing from it? Why should a reader care about this?

No. You do not include raw tabulated output like this in a publication. The columns aren't even labeled, so a reader has no idea what they are looking at. If it is worth showing a reader, then you render it properly, make sure everything is labeled, insert it as a table with a caption and reference and discuss it in the text.

The AQI is defined in terms of some of these correct? So those should probably not be included?

This wasn't addressed as any of your earlier pre-processing?

Now I have even less idea of what this is showing me

Ok. How little is very little data? Why is it necessary?

Are other suburbs of major cities not counted separately? It seems like this could be a tricky thing to be fair about. And counties kinda already split things in an unambiguous way?

Pretty sure this output should absolutely be removed.

I missed the other 24 thousand 300 somewhere....

Also, the thing below is a table, and should be referenced and captioned as such.

I think the count is largely unnecessary to show here, but what is up with Kansas City? And why is it not discussed when it is seemingly the only take-away I get from this table?

That doesn't seem correct. You can do all manner of regression algorithms with machine learning. No need to make this into a classification problem unless your SPECIFIC algorithm requires it. In which case you should discuss why you are using that specific algorithm.

How were these chosen?

What even am I looking at here?

The interactivity of the below is neat, but you need to talk about it!

For what purposes?

How? And what are the raw results?

Aren't all of these literally part of the definition of AQI?

This is essentially the equivalent of EDA in ML. A reader doesn't care about all of the attempts that didn't go as well unless something critical was shown in that case. Just move straight to the best and discuss what it implies.

these these three?

I'm confused why these are just labeled at Definitions?

What model is the above even for?? How is a reader supposed to interpret this?

Not explain in the text, as far as I can understand.

WHICH?

Like actual just random values for these parameters each time?

Definitely don't show this!

What does this mean?

It is a table, not a figure.

Comment on this if you are going to show it.

Is this supposed to be a much more subheading?

Captions need to be more detailed and discuss what a reader should take away from an image.

composed

Ok, so how did you go about doing that?

You literally JUST told me there were 2...

The above image is an unlabeled figure with no caption that is discussed nowhere in the text (at least so far). All of those things are problematic.

But is that what you are seeing here? It is confusing if you are talking in the abstract or about your specific data.

Also, why do this? What are your takeaways? These feels like it exists in isolation?

Say how it works!

This isn't code, so it shouldn't be in monospace. Underline or italicize it if you want to set it apart, or put it in quotes.

This should not be shown.

Why all these other headings? This is still part of the above?

Yup, that won't mean a thing to most readers (myself included) unless you explain it.

There is no "how to" here at all.

reference the figure correctly and explain it in the text!

Also, give it an actual meaningful caption.

Why is this just being mentioned after all of the ML stuff has happened?

Which tells us what?

??

The above graphic is a figure. Treat it as such!

Also, use dashed lines for one of the entries so that we can see that they are actually perfectly overlapping and not just take your word for it.

units? What do you conclude from this?

I don't understand what you are trying to say or do here. You have already done some of this above (I think) so I'd guess this is a summary, except that some of this I'm pretty sure I haven't seen?

Reference the figure number! And stick a caption on it!

Is this plot for portland? That isn't apparent anywhere that I can see either.

unnecessary

This is a publication. Use complete sentences.

Is this the actual cause? You showed some seasonality, I'm not sure these causes were showcased.

Ok, let me just say that at this point, after reading through all your above analysis, I have NO IDEA what your recommendations are going to be. Which probably tells me that you did a poor job of actually showcasing your proof for each of these recommendations.

I haven't read what they are yet, but for every recommendation you make, I should be able to go back to a specific section or figure and see the exact reason for why you would make that prediction. If that is not the case, then you are either making unfounded recommendations, or you are not communicating what your analysis was for clearly enough.

Agreed, how would you interpret your data in that light? Can you see evidence of that? Is the effect more pronounced in cities near lots of national forest? Otherwise you are just conjecturing.

Significantly affected? I thought you only saw a few of these at best as being significant contributors.

But again, these are just part of the definition of AQI aren't they? So of course they have a large impact?

Did you see evidence of this? You had bus data. Did cities with less traffic show decreases in these values?

So how did you choose your algorithms with this in mind?

Agreed, but I'm not sure you could see from your research if this was what was playing a large role?

Your link to the right up here is broken

Your contents here has way too much stuff. Break it into bigger chunks and use subheadings

Citation?

Ah, here it is. Given that you are pulling from the story for an entire paragraph, I'd lead with some reference to this source.

"In their book/article published in XXXX, Jacobs, Burgess, and Abbott tell the tale of...."

Two sentences isn't much of a paragraph.

factors