You can browse all the posts on this site that related to either Learning Experience Bingo, or its parent category, Open Knowledge Practices

This piece was originally a response to Rebecca Solnit’s Essay “Open Door” in which I discussed how my experience snowboarding in the woods related to her description of nineteenth-century American explorers. However, I decided that it would be better to write a stand alone piece in order that I could explain how a specific moment changed my thinking about riding backcountry. I believe that this allowed me to better describe my thoughts about this subject, for I could spend less time connecting my ideas to Solnit’s work.

I included this inorder to explain why my conversation with Dick Bench was important and meaningful for me. I believe that this shows how I used the information he told me in order to develop new ideas about backcountry. I think that this makes my essay more interesting because I go beyond what I saw or heard and instead gave my reader insight on my thoughts and on how I perceive the world.

I added this to the end of the paragraph in order to explain why I thought RA’s willingness to cooperate was important. I decided that it would be interesting if I connected what I discussed in this paragraph to another idea that I had talked about earlier, namely to the topic of RAs having mentorship roles. I felt it was important to explain why their ability to value others opinions and cooperate would be valuable for their conversations with their residents. I think that this made the paragraph interesting because I used what I had learned from my research in order to develop a new idea about the RAs.

In my first draft, I did not include an in depth description of the Residence Life meeting; rather, I only generally stated that I found the RAs were willing to work together in order to come to a solution. I believe that this example was helpful for my essay because it showed a specific instance where the RAs cooperated. This was helpful for my essay because I could explain my thought process by describing how and why I felt this instance made me conclude that RAs are willing to cooperate, thus making my essay more personal and unique to me.

Originally, this paragraph only included examples of how RAs work together, I revised it to only include one example and include an explanation of why I think this makes them cooperative people who value the opinions of their peers. I included this explanation to show why I found the examples important. I felt that this revision made the paragraph more meaningful, for it allowed me to describe a quality that I believe RAs to have instead of just naming something that they commonly do.

I added this analysis after my first draft because I wanted to go beyond just writing what I observed and instead explain what my observations lead me to think. I believe that this made my essay interesting, for it described something about the RAs that a casual observer would have not been able to pick up on. I was critical and thoughtful with what I observed, which allowed me to develop meaningful conclusions about Serina’s motivation for being an RA.

Here, I decided to only focus on this one quote from Sarina, rather than include another quote from Oliver and an observation from their meeting. I decided to do this so that I could explain what specific things sparked ideas in my head. This allowed me to explain not only what caused me to develop new ideas, but why they did so, and how they influenced my thinking.

In my first draft, I did not give reasons why I felt that my RA took the position for only the benefits. Instead, I only stated that I rarely talked to him and that he gave me the impression that he did not care about his residents. I decided to include a specific example of his impersonal approach to our group meetings in order to explain how I drew conclusions about him.

This came from all of my notes I took when I was making observations in the O'Connell House in preparation for writing the paper. It was all relevant information that fit well in my paper.

This is one thing I kept that was quite similar to the original piece. I still mentioned the experience my friend and I had in the O'Connell House that one night in the recreation room. It was this that actually got me thinking about the whole subject and I thought that introducing my piece with it and tying it back in the end was an effective use of the book ends method.

This piece evolved from the assignment that led up to the Meditation on Place Essay. It was when we were supposed to sit in our location for 30 minutes and free-write about all of its features and then write a piece about one feature in specific. I wrote about the scratches that I noticed on the floor of the O'Connell House. I wanted to work off of this piece because I truly enjoyed writing about my experiences in the O'Connell House and I simply love the place itself in general. When I revisited this piece, I realized what an interesting feature I described and how I could take it further and in a new direction that brought things onto a larger scale. As I began to write more about the marks I found in the O'Connell House, I realized that I truly am fascinated by these little blemishes because they make up an old, historic building. The original piece I wrote was nothing like what I ended up with here. It was simply describing the questions that came to my mind when I saw the scratches in the O'Connell House. But in this piece I decided to broaden my point and write about the attachment I have to old places in general.

I began to think about other places that I spend time in and I instantly thought of my grandmother's house that was bought during the Great Depression and that is completely filled with furniture from generations back. The house smells musty and the grand piano in the living room is so out of tune and scattered in music books that I'm sure my grandfather used to use. I am simply fascinated by all these little details that give the house its history and it is for this reason that I hold the place so dear to my heart.

According to the Natya Shastra Vasantasena as a courtesan must cast side long glances, itching her ears, showing off her breasts and navel and cleasing her hair to show to the audience that she is in love. (462 Natya Shastra)

Natyashastra translation volume 1 Bharat Muni translated by Manomohan Ghosh PHD

bereiten - to cause

der Wirtschaftswissenschaftler - o economista (homem) Plural é igual.

die Sorge - worry die Sorgen - worries

at the moment

to enter into

while, during

instead

to do, fazer

Links to zine learning experiences collected by Elvis Bakaitis.

Zine learning experiences collected by Elvis Bakaitis.

I added the interview from Ms Anderson to provide a good example of a faculty trying to solve such a problem. I did this because other faculties could use it as a reference to design their own ways to help Chinese students.

I inserted this new paragraph to discuss “why engaging Chinese students is important”, because I want to show that Chinese students have the potential to contribute to the American society both intellectually and economically, and persuade the college faculties to make effort to help make their adjustments successful.

I changed my personal experience from the first paragraph to here because I think this example supported the theory of “viewing teachers as authorities in Chinese education”. This would be a good illustration of the reasons why Chinese students do not engage actively in college.

ased on the micro-level theory of socialization, I moved my first paragraph here to use it as an example to illustrate the different definitions of a good studeny between the US and China. It served as an example of how students’ behavior are shaped by home environments, parental and teacher expectation, and how environment influenced the attitude and ideology one formed towards school and study.

I added the statistics to show the fact here-that is ,even though the quantity of Chinese students is large, the actual participation is relatively low. I did this because I thought emerging the readers with fact was more convincing and could directly raised their alertness to this issue.

Originally this is one single paragraph, but I separated them into two paragraphs because they are talking about different ideas. And I mixed them together in the free writing. I separated the part which talks about the benefits to the readers and to the writers. I learned from the class that the whole paragraph should only have one main idea and every sentence in the paragraph should all focus on that main idea.

I add my personal experience in order to give the reader an example of the benefits of using a question at the beginning of the essay. I learned from the class that personal experience is one of the most effective ways to help the reader have a better understanding of concepts or ideas. So I added this sentence to make more clear and appealing

This is the reflection of the reading, “On Writing to a question”. I choose this article as my short piece because I think reading changes the way I think about writing. I realized that writing can be used as a tool for exploration. And begin writing with a question is really helpful to me on constructed my essay. It also made writing more interesting and engaging to me.

Comme dans le roman d'un inverti?

Pensons à J'accuse!

Avantageux d'être connu. Alors tous les cas sont vrais? Ou s'agit-il seulement de rumeurs?

Proces Wilde?

Fin du nu masculin, qui laisse véritablement sa place au nu féminin.

Y retrouve-t-on toutefois la pensée religieuse derrière? On dit que la condamnation religieuse n'est pas bienvenue, on ne dit toutefois pas quelles sont les motivatons...

L'anthropologie criminelle se voulait très exactement celà....

Réel début de l'homosexualité comme domaine d'études

this was a reference to an interpretation of the Vigilant story, not to the actual reason for the ban. Midsize Jake does not care at all about accuracy, and it is that lack of care that is why the critic community has accomplished so little. Reality doesn't matter, it's all about appearances and snark.

He's avoiding fact here. Were people being accused of being pedophiles (or "pedophile apologists") without evidence? If so, my pointing it out would be ordinary and even constructive criticism. Were people being attacked who did not represent a real danger? I'm pretty sure of it, I recall examples. But others might actually be dangerous, and this would be a case-by-case issue. Mostly, though, the actual hazard was to Wikipedia reputation, the effort was to make the WMF look bad because it was "tolerating Very Bad People." And maybe it was, but that cuts in many ways.

I have never written a "near-book-length" post. Ever. Anywhere. I have called some of my posts "tomes," but that is a mere recognition that they can be substantially longer than the standard snarky sound-bites so much in favor in the wiki world. Now, what was the problem, exactly?

With the title, that's unlikely.

I had no such thought. Again, his own imagination is asserted as if a fact.

I made no such argument. Again, mindreading. But was there any error in my "version"? This is all fluff, ungrounded, purely hostile polemic, which I've come to expect from Wikipediocrats, too many of them.

I notice that, while he knew this, I assume, he did not correct it himself, but waited until I corrected it, and then attacks the correction as an attempt to rewrite history. Of course, imagined motives are not history, though people do write them into it.

First of all, my comment, which he links to, was in response to historical error -- which he acknowledges. So he mind-reads my intention, and projects it onto what I actually wrote, which did not claim what he asserts. To be sure, it could be read that way, which is why I've added a note. Rather, the effect of the ban was to prevent further exposure of the steward issue -- and other critical activity, including review of Wikipediocracy's obsession at the time, Pedophiles on the Wiki!!!!

No errors are shown, much less lies. This is standard Vigilant polemic, hardly anything but unremitting contempt.

It's long, and it is indeed evidence. In court, contemporaneous notes carry weight, far more than later recollection.

A.b.d. ... Charming, isn't he? He links to my contemporaneous "bliki," notes about the Offwiki affair, about which many have been bloviating with no grounding in fact.

Waldron hat mich überzeugt, dass es keinen Widerspruch zwischen 2. und 3. gibt. Aber wie von Waldron vorher ausgeführt beinhaltet ein Recht in einem weitläufigen Verständnis ja auch ein Hohfelsches Privileg. Dieses Privileg hieße ja so viel wie:

1. P hat keine moralische Pflicht A nicht zu tun

Dies steht auch nach der Diskussion von Waldron für mich im Widerspruch zu 2. Ich sehe nicht an welcher Stelle Waldron auf diese anfangs gestellt Problem eingeht und es löst.

Warum eigentlich nicht? Nur weil wir nicht so sprechen? Natürlich ist die Frage "Warum hast du geheiratet?" nicht durch "Weil ich ein moralisches Recht dazu hatte" hinreichend beantwortet. Dennoch könnte die Person sagen, dass (gerade eingedenk Feinbergs) das moralische Recht eine valide Rechtfertigung für das Heiraten darstellt. Klarer Weise beantwortet das Recht zu Heiraten nicht die Frage nach der psychologischen Motivation eine bestimmte Person zu heiraten, daraus folgt in meinen Augen aber nicht, dass das Recht nicht auf einer anderen Ebene eine Rechtfertigung darstellen kann.

Wie genau ist die individual choice die Grundlage der Universalisierung? Indem sie bei allen Menschen jedenfalls im Grundsatz vorausgesetzt wird? Der Zusammenhang von der Generalität von Rechten und der individual choice als ihrem eigentlichen Schutzgut wird doch erst auf S. 34 begründet und entspricht dem nicht? Universalität ist schließlich auch nicht deckungsgleich mit Generalität.

Ich habe mich hier gefragt, ob das tatsächlich der logischen Form der Aussagen entspricht, welche Waldron skizziert als: 1. P has a moral right to do A. und 2. P's doing A is morally wrong. Schließlich ergibt sich durch sein Beispiel so etwas wie: 1. P hat ein moralisches Recht frei zu wählen. und 2. P's Wählen der 'National Front' (als einer rassistischen Partei) ist moralisch falsch. Das Wählen der rassistischen Partei scheint durch die freie Wahl impliziert zu werden, aber ergibt sich da für die logische Notation nicht so etwas wie: 1. P has a moral right to do A. und 2. P's doing A'(/B) is morally wrong. Wenn das zutrifft, wäre es dann noch eine Kontradiktion?

Muss man, um dieses Mehr an (moralischer?) Bedeutung anzunehmen, nicht doch Konsequentialist sein? Oder geht diese Frage am Punkt vorbei, den Waldron machen will?

Warum genau? Weil vor allem die Beziehung zwischen 2 und 2A und nicht die zu 1 oder 1A betrachtet wird?

These findings provide support for the notion that infants possess perspective-taking

Main finding of the study

There were three different groups: tease group, refuse group, and play group. Each group had three different conditions which were the different levels of the IV.

This was an interesting finding to me. I did not know prior to taking this course that infants had sensitivity to behavioral intentions when they are in a social setting inferring others' intentions/preferences

Similar to the other language article we were assigned, this finding really struck me since like I stated in the previous article, it is something I was not aware of prior to taking this course or that infants even possessed this ability.

This finding was certainly something new for me. I was amazed by it since I did not know infants possessed the ability to distinguish between languages at such an early age and that this skill declines with age.

This was the experimental method utilized for testing infants

Looking time was the dependent variable being measured in all experiments to see which event infants tend to look at longer and find the most surprising/uncommon that captures their attention.

Two possible explanations for how infants might interpret the atypical event of someone falling without being touched or having any physical contact with anything around.

Hypothesis for experiment two

one of the experimental methods utilized to test for the weight-compression rule

This was one of the Independent variables and had two levels: the equal event where the cookie was split fairly between the two penguins or an unequal event where the cookie was split unfairly between the two.

Three main study predictions/hypothesis

Hypothesis

This is interesting to me because I know these factors could certainly influence memory. However, despite that, it has been shown that infants possess the ability to recall for long periods of time, if and only they are periodically exposed to the cues that aid in the memory retrieval process.

This was an interesting finding to me but not too surprising since I know stress can certainly influence a human beings memory and performance.

Main hypothesis: Based on the results, it was supported.

Dependent variable two: five different levels

Dependent variable one

This was the dependent variables used in the study: frequency and duration of the specific babies' behaviors

it is so sad that he died at such a young age

this is a very interesting mix of music influences

I worked more on this particular essay because I was interested in seeing where I would end up. I picked the starting point of the Shell gas station from the first paper and let myself freewrite. That is when I realized what I wanted the main takeaway of this one-pager to be: how the store has impacted me, specifically through the interactions with customers. At such a young age, I was observant, but it was not until reflecting on that experience that I was able to pinpoint why and how my time there has shaped my childhood.

In my original draft, I said I tried to help my parents work in any way possible without any explanation of what that actually entailed. By adding in what ways I tried to help out, it makes the narrative more personal and specific.

When thinking about the impact the store has had on me, I realized my experience was shaped by the people that made the store an actual place for me. I have this memory of a customer that was so loyal to our store that he came every day around the same time in the morning for his usual cup of coffee. My mom treated him like a friend instead of a customer, and it is clear that it resonated with him in this interaction with me. I believe this anecdote brings out the genuine connection I had with that Shell gas station.

This piece was originally a one-page response paper to Dorothy Allison’s essay, “Place.” In that response paper I mentioned my “secret place:” the Shell gas station my parents used to own. While I did talk about some aspects of the place that had shaped my childhood experience, I had felt that I could say a lot more about it. I wanted to use the skills I believed I really had excelled in (for my Meditation on Place essay) to create a shorter piece focusing on only one main aspect of the store that has shaped my experience. I was excited to write this piece mostly because I never actually share anything about it. I enjoyed being able to dive back into the past to bring out some vivid memories I wouldn’t have traded for anything else.

I think Johnson is talking about building bridges both between the races, butn also within the African American community. To "build bridges everywhere" would ultimately strengthen all aspects of blackness within America -- strengthen the black community by coming together and building bridges with one another, and lessen the culture gap with white America

I've noticed the word "souls" recurring in African-American works, notbly DuBois' 'Souls of Black Folk'. Black writers favouring the word "souls" reflectes the soulfullness lof their art (especialluy in music). To have soul is a good thing, and their use of teh word highlights a pride and an undertsanidng if their own humanity - humanity that was forever being stripped from them by white people. Use of the word empowers them.

These lines reflect the growing sense of value in African-Americans. It highlights the 'New Negro's refusual to submit to White men and the inequalities of segregation and racism.

Johnson's initial negative reaction to the "darky" being flipped to one of amazement and awe reflects the underestimation of the African American community. The gradual realisation that he is dignified and proud, is similar to the gradual growth in emporwerment and pride in Ablack Harlem. The stanza works as if to say, "You may laugh at the negro now, but you'll soon realise how misguided you were"

Ginsberg sees the good and the miraculous aspects of America being flushed away. In this new, modern landscaope, all is lost -- perhaps, then, the frenzied turn to drugs as an escape or attempt to revive these lost "miracles"

The blending of dreams and drugs, "waking nighhtmares", creates a sense of delirium. The line between dream and reality has been blurred. The copius drugs, mixed with the madness of society has made it hard for people to distimnguish reality from illusion

Depicting the "best minds" "burning their money"highlighhts the opposition to capitlaims that a lot of the Beats and hippies backed. In the mad modern world ofm1950s America, burning their money can be seen as a rejection of this culture and alos a last-ditch attempt at survival in an ever-maddening world

This line seems like a prelude to "I, Too, Sing America". By By writing that he "heard the singing of the Mississippi when Abe Lincoln went down to New Orleans", Hughes places himself in a truly American moment, as if to say "yes, I was there... And I'm still here now." He ties blackness to America in this poem.

Hughes' loose structure and use of free verse gives the poem a cadence that, when spoken aloud, strengthens the protest message. The lines don’t rhyme and follow no strict rhythm, unable to be contained, and the lines are short and declarative, building to that final: “I, too, am America.”

I found it important to include this because these thoughts go through most people's minds in this particular experience. When writing this paper about creating a place out of the stairs, it was easy to talk to other people about their experience on this widely public location. Once we all realized that we do the same thing, it was easy to talk about it. Including it in the essay made it more relatable and would help readers be more receptive of the authentic social interactions that take place on the never-ending stairs.

This major change follows along the string of including more personal anecdotes to make my writing more clear. This provides a contrast to my introduction that focuses on the feeling of being just another person. I am able to explicitly talk about the stimulus of home for me. My response of wanting that to happen here at Boston College is backed up with my experience with my family. This personal reference helps me explain the importance of recognizing people around campus and having meaningful interactions with others.

Brown’s unapologetic use of black, African-American dialect is 'new' and striking. The diction and spellings are colloquial, using African-American vernacular to create dialectic verse that is distinct to the writing of the ‘New Negro Movement.’

Stanza's refelect verse/chorus structure in music: stanzas I & III have a lilting, rhythmic flow, a counterpoint to stanzas II & IV that have a more free, melodic flow that follows less of a set rhythm. This experimentation with rhythm adheres to Pound’s third principle of modernism: “As regarding rhythm: to compose in the sequence of the musical phrase, not in sequence of a metronome.” The similarities between stanzas I & III, and their rhythmic structuring, conjure a chorus-like quality, with stanzas II & IV acting as verses. Brown is writing a poem about music, whilst consciously structuring the poem in a musical way, not to a metronome but to that of “musical phrase”.

Das ist ja eine sehr interessante Formulierung! Ich glaube, daran scheiden sich ja die Geister: ab welchem Moment kann man sagen, dass ein Mensch "lebt", vgl. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beginn_des_Menschseins

Weiter unten bzw. in dem Text über die rechtlichen Aspekte wird ja darauf verwiesen, dass das Zerstören totipotenter Zellen als problematisch angesehen wird, weil sich aus jeder Zelle ein eigenständiger Mensch entwickeln könnte, d.h. da geht man auch schon von "Leben" bzw. (potenziellem) "Menschsein" aus....

Aber wenn auf die Dauer die Risiken durch neue Verfahren geringer werden, dann kann ich mir vorstellen, dass sich deutlich für eine solche PID entscheiden. Als Beispiel denke ich da an die pränatale Untersuchung auf Trisomie 21, die ja inzwischen völlig risikolos durchgeführt werden kann (Bluttest statt Plazenta-Punktion).

I add the whole paragraph in between the introduction and the actual body paragraph. This paragraph explained the process of meditation before I started to explore its benefits. It helped the reader to understand my essay better.

I add this sentence for a better transition, so the whole passage went fluently from one benefit of meditation to another one.

Originaly, I wrote about my medataion on a place as the inroduction without introducing the labyrinth. I made in to this new introduction, becasue first, it can be a book end structure, and second it helps the read have a better understanding of why was I interesting in meditation. This new introfuction gives the reader who never read my "meditation on a place" essay a better context of the article.

Originally, my focus is too general, so I change it. This new part I extended my idea and be critical on the topic.

I added this personal experience, first to achieve a bookend structure, I went back to the labyrinth and had new feelings about it. Second, I wished to use my personal experiences to convene the reader that meditation is beneficial.

I added this analysis to further proofed the similarity of mental and physical exercises, which I mentioned before. And help the reader have a better understanding of the benefits of meditation

I wrote, "negative emotion processing" in the first draft, but it is hard for the reader to understand what it actually was because they did not read the original article, so I added this sentence to explain the process of negative emotion processing.

This sentence originally was in the middle of the paragraph, but I put it into the first sentence as a better transition and much more logical.

My first draft had these two paragraphs together, then I realized that the first paragraph was talking about why high external attention was a benefit, and the second paragraph was about the brain activities proofed the benefits existed. So they should be separated.

I added this sentence in order to clarify my previous analogy of “brain as a muscle”.

https://github.com/Alamofire/Alamofire/blob/master/Documentation/AdvancedUsage.md#session-manager

This is important to note when trying to wrap my head around how OAuth2 integrates with AlamoFire

Serait possible de rajouter ces deux références qui expliquent le sous titre :

Perec, G. (1978). Je me souviens. Paris : Hachette.

Brainard, J. (1970-1975). I Remember. Traduit en 1997 par Marie Chaix. Arles : Actes Sud.

Flattening a multi-dimensional matrix into a 1-D array using list comprehension:

x = [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
 [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]]

arr = [i for j in x for i in j]
print(arr)
>>> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Nested for loop using list comprehension to come up with 5x5 matrix:

arr = [[i for i in range(5)] for j in range(5)]
arr
>>> [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4],
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]]

2 examples of conditional statements in list comprehension:

arr = [i for i in range(10) if i % 2 == 0]
print(arr)
>>> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]

and:

arr = ["Even" if i % 2 == 0 else "Odd" for i in range(10)]
print(arr)
>>> ['Even', 'Odd', 'Even', 'Odd', 'Even', 'Odd', 'Even', 'Odd', 'Even', 'Odd']

List comprehension in Python to create a simple dictionary:

x = [2,45,21,45]
y = {i:v for i,v in enumerate(x)}
print(y)
>>> {0: 2, 1: 45, 2: 21, 3: 45}

hello

Absolutely necessary reminder; pastors would do well to preach on this with some regularity.

This is from me.

When reading this paragraph about the differences in writing between different cultures, It really grabbed my attention. I believe that this relationship between different writing orientations can be used an example for a more broad picture and a larger scale. This difference in writing greatly shows how these differences can be applied to social contrasts that they exit among our cultures. Therefore, helping us better study these social behavior differences in our cultures as well as those who exist around us.

This is the sum of the linguistic fallacy

This is clearly part of what modest actual intentionalism means!

This is modest actual intentionalism

Also a plain and clear definition of modest actual intentionalism

Clearly sets out the modest actual intentionalist view

Bakkah is a Saudi management consulting and education company that offers a wide range of products and services. We develop solutions tailored to our customer’s needs. Our team of highly experienced, certified professionals helps you reach the best decisions that ensure you realize optimum business profits by delivering projects on time, cost, and quality. We pride ourselves in having the skills and knowledge based on best industry practices that enable us to provide a myriad of solutions for business strategy to the most functional and operative areas.

We finish with the same color we started with, a blue, showing Lane's appreciation for the natural world. This also references a moment Lane talks about in “‘Pulling in the Natural Environment’: An Interview with Pinkie Gordon Lane” by John Lowe, in which her son asked her for binoculars in order to see the equator.

Anacostia this is a high-crime neighborhood in Washington D.C. The overall crime rate is higher than the national average. In the poem Ellis describes how they were told to avoid Southeast DC because it is not a safe area.

m = 20, n = 10 20 / 10 = 2 CASE 1

m = 100, n = 70 100 / 70 CASE 2 gcd(100, 100 % 70) =

gcd(100, 30) gcd(100,30) CASE 2 gcd(100, 100 % 30) =

gcd(100, 10) 100 / 10 = 10 CASE 1

gcd(100, 70) = 10

Another example of the young woman reacting to the grief

Here, Evans is referencing Claude McKay’s poem "If We Must Die." Similar to McKay’s poem, Mari Evans is using this stanza as a call-to-arms of sorts, insinuating that complacence is harmful and action must be taken to enact change.

fiche a part en cours...

oui ça me travaille toujours : fiche sur la dérive et la géopoétique en cours

questionner le principe anthologique

à questionner aussi bien comme rythme de lecture que comme rythme de navigation/passage d'une entité textuelle à l'autre

fiche en cours

fiche définition sur liens faibles en cours

reprendre Eco et la notion d'œuvre ouverte

• notion d'actualisation

je reprends cette réflexion dans une fiche sur le lecteur.ice : en cours

Peut-être pourrions-nous intégrer à la suite de ce paragraphe les trois photogrammes fournis afin d'illustrer les trois modes de présence évoqués.

Rattacher ce court paragraphe au paragraphe précédent

Ajouter en tête de phrase : "Telle qu'elle a été rapportée par la presse" = "Telle qu'elle a été rapportée par la presse, l'expérience d'Oberwald, etc."

Remplacer par "est"

Remplacer par "exclut"

Remplacer par "souligne donc à la fois"

Supprimer "désormais"

Remplacer par "avait"

Remplacer par "avait"

Remplacer par "est"

Remplacer par "pouvaient"

Remplacer "maintenant" par "désormais"

Ajouter "with them" après "techniques"

Ajouter "grâce à eux" après "expérimenter"

Always good to have some old saying as your backup. I added this one in there as an expressing of honesty--it was exactly what I thought when I quitted the band. The academics seemed more important than a hobby, I suppose. Honestly, I often regret this choice (of leaving the band), and I would use this old saying to comfort myself that this might be the only rational way.

I tried to use more humorous and approachable tone this time, as oppose to the dull and bland tone I adopted at first. After reading my first draft the second time--this time I read it out loud, I found that I could hardly finish the piece because it was so boring. So this time I added some spice in it.

Would something bad be happening that her daughter could not witness?

this shows a glimpse of manipulation

They were originally enjoying each other's company.

create

Cette affirmation est étonnante. Pourquoi chercher à catégoriser les relations humaines en "problème" ou en "solution" ?

Est-ce que la question n'est pas plutôt de faire en sorte que ces relations humaines soient fonctionnelles plutôt que dysfonctionnelles ? (sous-entendu, s'intéresser aux conditions favorables pour que se développent des relations humaines fonctionnelles)

Détail de l'évènement et notamment des 8 conférences: https://www.fnege.org/actualites/1036/integralite-de-la-conference-au-secours-les-relations-humaines-reviennent

Argument rhétorique pathos => Objectif de l'auteur est de démontrer que les relations humaines sont partout mais qu'on a l'habitude de se concentrer uniquement sur sa face sombre ?

Argument épistémique inductif (généralisation)

Argument épistémique inductif (généralisation)

Argument épistémique inductif (généralisation)

Argument dialectique pour.

Avec l'idée sous-jacente que même dans la vision précitée où la technique est mise au premier plan, l'humain demeure indispensable ("on en appelle alors aux talents", "l'engagement des personnes dans leur travail")

Argument dialectique contre

Argument dialectique contre

L'auteur serait-il en désaccord avec ce point ? => A la lecture de l'article, on peut en conclure que oui. Pour lui, les relations humaines ne sont jamais parties.

La question argumentative semble être celle-ci: est-ce que les relations humaines ont déjà été absentes des organisations de travail ?

En tous cas, pour lui, il semblerait qu'elle ne soit jamais parti même si certains essayent régulièrement "d'évacuer" cet élément de divers moyens (Taylor, la montée en puissance des systèmes d'informations, etc.).

Argument rhétorique logos

Argument rhétoriques logos

Argument rhétorique logos

Est-ce qu'il n'y a pas une contradiction avec l'argument précédent ?

Quelle différence entre un système de normes international et un système de normes national ("lois" évoqué ici) ?

Etonnant de dire que des règles (en théorie) librement consentie ne sont pas suffisante pour régler la question des relations entre acteurs mais que des règles imposées d'en haut ("systèmes de normes et de références développés au niveau international") pourraient le faire.

Ne serait-ce pas de nouveau une façon d'évacuer la question de la conflictualité qui peut se faire jour dans les rapports sociaux ? (Autre moyen que la parcellisation des tâches du taylorisme qui essaye de placer chaque individu sur son ilot autonome ?)

"Créée en 1947, l’ANDRH est une association loi 1901 au service des professionnelles des ressources humaines d'entreprises et d'organisations de tous secteurs d’activité et de toutes tailles, publiques et privées, nationales et internationales.

Depuis plus de soixante-dix ans, l’ANDRH anticipe et accompagne l’évolution des métiers des ressources humaines. Avec plus de 5 000 membres, professionnelles et expertes RH, elle est aujourd’hui la plus grande communauté RH en France et l’acteur de référence dans le débat RH. " (source: le site de l'ANDRH)

"L'Association francophone de gestion de ressources humaines ou AGRH est une société académique de langue française qui regroupe des enseignants-chercheurs et des experts en sciences de gestion de pays francophones (Europe, Afrique, Amérique du Nord, "Proche et Moyen-Orient…) spécialisés en gestion des ressources humaines (GRH). Elle rassemble environ 1 000 membres dont trois quarts d’entre eux sont des enseignants-chercheurs en poste dans des universités, grandes écoles ou établissements d’enseignement supérieur en France et à l’étranger." (source: wikipedia)

La Fondation nationale pour l’enseignement de la gestion des entreprises, plus connue sous l'acronyme "Fnege, a été créée en 1968 par l’État français et les entreprises dans le but de développer et d'améliorer la qualité de l’enseignement supérieur de gestion des entreprises en France pour le porter à un niveau comparable à celui des grands pays industrialisés (notamment les États-Unis)." (source: wikipedia)

"Xerfi est un institut d’études privé. Il est spécialisé dans l'analyse économique sectorielle en France et à l'international, l'analyse concurrentielle, la macro-économique et la conjoncture, les études ad'hoc, les enquêtes de conjoncture et les prévisions professionnelles." (source: wikipedia)

Industry 4 came into construction industry.

Argument épistémique

Question argumentative // En fait, pas du tout