- Oct 2023
-
-
LLMs are merely engines for generating stylistically plausible output that fits the patterns of their inputs, rather than for producing accurate information. Publishers worry that a rise in their use might lead to greater numbers of poor-quality or error-strewn manuscripts — and possibly a flood of AI-assisted fakes.
-
for: progress trap, progress trap - AI, progress trap - AI - writing research papers
-
comment
- potential fakes
- climate science fakes by big oil think tanks
- Covid and virus research
- race issues
- gender issues
- potential fakes
-
-
- Sep 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
I have no clue like like who you know if anybody reads them or who reads them or or what happens after that I don't know yeah yeah well I 01:21:00 appreciate that and certainly people people you know that people contact me but I I know it's it's very hard to know um you know how these things are are actually spreading or not spreading through the through the community
- for: Indyweb provenance,
- comment
- Indyweb would enable Michael to trace all public interactions with his papers so he WOULD know.
-
- Apr 2023
-
winnielim.org winnielim.org
-
It is difficult to see interdependencies This is especially true in the context of learning something complex, say economics. We can’t read about economics in a silo without understanding psychology, sociology and politics, at the very least. But we treat each subject as though they are independent of each other.
Where are the tools for graphing inter-dependencies of areas of study? When entering a new area it would be interesting to have visual mappings of ideas and thoughts.
If ideas in an area were chunked into atomic ideas, then perhaps either a Markov monkey or a similar actor could find the shortest learning path from a basic idea to more complex ideas.
Example: what is the shortest distance from an understanding of linear algebra to learn and master Lie algebras?
Link to Garden of Forking Paths
Link to tools like Research Rabbit, Open Knowledge Maps and Connected Papers, but for ideas instead of papers, authors, and subject headings.
It has long been useful for us to simplify our thought models for topics like economics to get rid of extraneous ideas to come to basic understandings within such a space. But over time, we need to branch out into related and even distant subjects like mathematics, psychology, engineering, sociology, anthropology, politics, physics, computer science, etc. to be able to delve deeper and come up with more complex and realistic models of thought.Our early ideas like the rational actor within economics are fine and lovely, but we now know from the overlap of psychology and sociology which have given birth to behavioral economics that those mythical rational actors are quaint and never truly existed. To some extent, to move forward as a culture and a society we need to rid ourselves of these quaint ideas to move on to more complex and sophisticated ones.
-
- Oct 2022
-
www.explainpaper.com www.explainpaper.com
-
Another in a growing line of research tools for processing and making sense of research literature including Research Rabbit, Connected Papers, Semantic Scholar, etc.
Functionality includes the ability to highlight sections of research papers with natural language processing to explain what those sections mean. There's also a "chat" that allows you to ask questions about the paper which will attempt to return reasonable answers, which is an artificial intelligence sort of means of having an artificial "conversation with the text".
cc: @dwhly @remikalir @jeremydean
-
- Apr 2022
-
-
In 2019, Smolyansky co-founded Connected Papers, one of a new generation of visual literature-mapping and recommendation tools.
https://www.connectedpapers.com/
https://twitter.com/ConnectedPapers
Something about the name Connected Papers reminds me of the same sort of linking name that Manfred Kuehn gave to his note taking software ConnectedText.
-
- Jul 2020
-
www.apa.org www.apa.org
-
Call for Papers: Risk Perception, Communication, and Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19. (n.d.). Https://Www.Apa.Org. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xap/call-for-papers-covid-19
-
- Jun 2020
-
onlinelibrary.wiley.com onlinelibrary.wiley.com
-
British Journal of Social Psychology. (n.d.). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8309
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Science in the time of COVID-19. Nat Hum Behav 4, 327–328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0879-9
-
-
www.apa.org www.apa.org
-
Call for Papers: COVID19-Pandemic. (n.d.). Https://Www.Apa.Org. Retrieved June 11, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/amp/call-for-papers-covid19-pandemic
-
-
www.springer.com www.springer.com
-
Journal of Computational Social Science. Springer. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://www.springer.com/journal/42001/updates/17993070
-
- May 2020
-
www.apa.org www.apa.org
-
American Psychological Association. Interdivisional call for papers: Developing resilience in response to stress and trauma. Apa.org. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/hea/interdivisional-call-for-papers-resilience-stress-trauma
-
- Apr 2020
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Ebbinghaus is also largely credited with drafting the first standard research report. In his paper on memory, Ebbinghaus arranged his research into four sections: the introduction, the methods, the results, and a discussion section. The clarity and organization of this format was so impressive to contemporaries that it has now become standard in the discipline, and all research reports follow the same standards laid out by Ebbinghaus.
-
- Oct 2016
-
www-cambridge-org.soton.idm.oclc.org www-cambridge-org.soton.idm.oclc.org