1,946 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2017
    1. After days of frantic preparations, residents in Tampa were bracing for Irma’s arrival early Monday

      They winds in this storm were insane and destroyed a lot things.

    2. ed up the middle of Florida late Sunday night, slowly spinning toward the Tampa region.

      The storm also made the Tampa Bay nfl team have to play at a different time making a week 1 a bye

    1. Harvard’s top brass overturned Ms. Jones’s admission after some professors raised concerns that she played down her crime in the application process.

      more than 20 years ago, she is now a different woman

    1. The point of political protest is to change the world. And yet the process matters, too.
    2. To live in the present is not to avoid hard work or strife. Alongside the projects that occupy you in your profession, or in your political life, the telic activities that matter to you, is the atelic process of protesting injustice or doing your job. To value the process is not to flee from work or political engagement. That is why living in the present is not an abdication of ethical responsibility or a recipe for detachment.
    3. To live in the present is not to deny the value of telic activities, of making a difference in the world. That would be a terrible mistake. Nor can we avoid engaging in such activities. But if projects are all we value, our lives become self-subversive, aimed at extinguishing the sources of meaning within them. To live in the present is to refuse the excessive investment in projects, in achievements and results, that sees no inherent value in the process.
    4. To live in the present is to appreciate the value of atelic activities like going for a walk, listening to music, spending time with family or friends. To engage in these activities is not to extinguish them from your life. Their value is not mortgaged to the future or consigned to the past, but realized here and now. It is to care about the process of what you are doing, not just projects you aim to complete.
    5. “If you are learning, you have not at the same time learned.” When you care about telic activities, projects such as writing a report, getting married or making dinner, satisfaction is always in the future or the past. It is yet to be achieved and then it is gone. Telic activities are exhaustible; in fact, they aim at their own exhaustion. They thus exhibit a peculiar self-subversion. In valuing and so pursuing these activities, we aim to complete them, and so to expel them from our lives.
    6. Atelic activities, by contrast, do not by nature come to an end and are not incomplete. In defining such activities, we could emphasize their inexhaustibility, the fact that they do not aim at terminal states. But we could also emphasize what Aristotle does: They are fully realized in the present. “At the same time, one is seeing and has seen, is understanding and has understood, is thinking and has thought.” There is nothing you need to do in order to perform an atelic activity except what you are doing right now. If what you care about is reflecting on your life or spending time with family or friends, and that is what you are doing, you are not on the way to achieving your end: You are already there.
    1. After about third grade, very little time is devoted to explicit writing instruction

      Not at Countryside Middle School!

      Our Literature and Writing Workshop rigorously maintains focus and practice time devoted to writing, from grammar, style, and technique, to active writing and publication (sharing) in formal and informal modes. Writing and active focus on writing are daily efforts.

    2. Should a parent correct a child’s writing, or just be encouraging?

      This is the ten million dollar question with a vending-machine answer: The work is the child's. It must be the child's entirely if the goal is to develop and hone writing skills. Loving parents might and often do get too involved.

      It does the young writer zero good to lose control of a written work (and it feels terrible even if never admitted—I was one of those kids). That problem is compounded when the teacher reads a twelve year old's assignment that looks too much (or entirely like) the bona-fide polished work of a mature writer with several college degrees. The teacher is not impressed and the process breaks down, for she or he is supposed to be evaluating and coaching a middle school writer on genuinely warty, often needy middle school writing.

      It does a young writer zero good to be a "middle man" left to watch back and forth between adults when the writing at the center is not the student's. A teacher can't minister to a young writer's real needs and the student can't learn if it's not the student's real writing at undergoing the writing workshop processes.

    3. analyzing text does make a difference

      Right.

      There is reading and there is active reading. I support both but in appropriate settings. Everyone should enjoy ample time just reading for pleasure, escape. When reading for a specific purpose the foundation of which is understanding, we must be active readers—even while the process can still be enjoyable.

      Reading actively takes additional effort and concentration, often with note taking (or annotation in a cool web-markup tool like this!), and purposeful thought about what is said, how, and why.

    4. start talking about persuasive essays or an informative paper

      We do this work a great deal—we don't use these labels "persuasive essay," "informative paper" because (a) outside of school nobody at all uses these terms for real writing and (b) such labels tend to mystify and ossify thinking about writing in ways that aren't helpful. We focus on purpose, technique, sign-posting and evidence, and more in the composition of many types of writing like these and others.

    5. writing assignments to work on at home

      Because we devote 3/5 of all class periods explicitly to in-class writing instruction and independent, guided writing time (and the other 2/5 involve our writing at least indirectly by working with other texts which we read and analyze for writing about), we aim to minimize the writing done at home.

      By design, students have time at school to write, revise, consult with the teacher, critique the writing of others, and write some more. When writing is done at home, it is intended to be as overflow when more than what's available in class is needed.

      There's a magical dynamic here. When student writers know they will have adequate time for writing in class, supported, scaffolded for their needs, and that what they don't get done in school must be done at home, they tend to use school time better. Writing workshops become focused, intentional, productive spaces where tons of learning and growth occur.

    6. Is my kid writing at school

      Yes, at Countryside Middle School, we do this in a nearly unbroken stream of constructive activities.

    7. middle and high school, the most common activities are fill-in-the-blanks on worksheets, writing single sentences, making lists or writing a paragraph summary

      Nope. Not at Countryside Middle School. We write, scrutinize, revise, share, and write more. Our students learn to consider, brainstorm, draft, revise with feedback, finalize, and share in many formal and other modes, primarily at school in a controlled and closely monitored learning environment.

    8. Kids are constantly creating text when they are at home. They tweet, they text, they Facebook. Each of those has its own rules

      Writing in formal modes like essays, responses to literature, book reviews, etc., have their own rules and expectations, but they're not by a thousand miles the only kinds of writing that people do or that have importance.

      Kids (like adults) are increasingly social-media writers. It may seem at times that these modes are the Wild West with lawlessness and emoticons, but there are rules and expectations—particularly concerning positive interactions and relationship building as good digital citizens.

    9. with them about the author’s craft

      This is the primary purpose for readings of all kinds selected in my English/language arts curriculum. All reading done for class purposes is intended to be active reading.

      With younger readers like middle schoolers, this doesn't always come easily and part of the comprehensive process is to teach the skills involved in active reading while reinforcing their value.

    1. Ellen Zentner, chief United States economist at Morgan Stanley, said that although Hurricane Harvey’s impact on national gross domestic product in the third quarter might be fairly neutral, “the lagged effects of rebuilding homes and replacing motor vehicles can lost longer,”

      Seems like the idea of rebuilding and the gaining of money from itself is thought of too often.

    2. But economists say the region is likely to recover quickly and may even experience a bump in growth from rebuilding.

      This is common with many natural disasters. Hurricane Harvey is not alone in this fact.

    3. So far, the storm seems to have damaged things that can be replenished or replaced relatively quickly.

      However, contractors have already been warned that certain at-risk areas of Houston may be blacklisted from rebuilds due to the risk of more incredibly destructive in the future.

    1. Where are the statues in the former slave states honoring the very large part of the Southern population (beginning with the four million slaves) that sided with the Union rather than the Confederacy? Where are the monuments to the victims of slavery or to the hundreds of black lawmakers who during Reconstruction served in positions ranging from United States senator to justice of the peace to school board official? Excluding blacks from historical recognition has been the other side of the coin of glorifying the Confederacy.

      Good point.

    2. “our” history and culture

      "A great nation does not hide its history. It faces its flaws and corrects them."

    3. Blacks, wrote Chief Justice Roger B. Taney (a statue of whom was removed from public display in Baltimore this week), were and would always be aliens in America.

      Another example of not accepting a culture, flip-side of my other point.

    4. Should American nationality be based on shared values, regardless of race, ethnicity and national origin, or should it rest on “blood and soil,” to quote the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, Va., whom Trump has at least partly embraced?

      Is it possible to have shared values in a culture that is so diverse? And if so, how? And is it moral to guide other's morals? Is it moral to say that my truth is right and your truth is wrong? (Even though yes, slavery is awful, the confederacy was not the brightest moment of our history, but that doesn't take away from the fact that people do see the confederacy in a different light that honors their culture.)

    5. “the history and culture of our great country” raises numerous questions, among them: Who is encompassed in that “our”

      History is written by white men, doesn't include minorities in the "our"

    1. No software system can be free from bugs (or intruders), and users must be mindful of the risks. But the inherent lack of perfect automotive safety doesn’t mean we don’t try to make cars safer. Obviously, people should drive more carefully, but seatbelts, airbags and better car design reduce injury enormously, and that has been great for the industry as well as consumers. The software industry should be no different.

      Exactly!

    1. Now that many of the biggest tech companies operate like media businesses, trafficking in information, they’re in a race to create new products to charm and track consumers.

      I want to explore this whole tech companies acting like media companies thing...

    1. Part of the wild success of the Silicon Valley giants of today — and what makes their stocks so appealing to investors — has come from their ability to attain huge revenue and profits with relatively few workers.Apple, Alphabet (parent of Google) and Facebook generated $333 billion of revenue combined last year with 205,000 employees worldwide. In 1993, three of the most successful, technologically oriented companies based in the Northeast — Kodak, IBM and AT&T — needed more than three times as many employees, 675,000, to generate 27 percent less in inflation-adjusted revenue.The 10 most valuable tech companies have 1.5 million employees, according to calculations by Michael Mandel of the Progressive Policy Institute, compared with 2.2 million employed by the 10 biggest industrial companies in 1979. Mr. Mandel, however, notes that today’s tech industry is adding jobs much faster than the industrial companies, which took many decades to reach that scale.

      It seems like this would certainly contribute to wealth inequality, since the majority of today's tech workforce is more well-educated than the industrial employees of decades past (who then shared in their employer's rise).

    1. “You might be able to get more lycopene out because the heat starts to break down the cell matrix and that actually allows some of the tied-up carotenoids to be released from the cell walls,”

      I would have stated it differently. Heating will help break down the cell walls, which facilitates the release of lycopene from the chromoplasts.

    1. In the aftermath of the litigation, seven of the banks involved have adopted arbitration clauses to their contracts.

      did they abandon the efforts to maximize the number of overdraft fees?

    2. two Supreme Court decisions, in 2011 and 2013, enshrined its use.

      ugh

    3. class-action lawyers, who tend to be Democratic donors.

      interesting

    1. Thanks to the sanitized images of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement that dominate our nation’s classrooms and our national discourse, many Americans imagine that protests organized by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and countless local organizations fighting for justice did not fall victim to violent outbreaks

      King's image and the civil rights movement are sanitized to make them more palatable for white society. How can contemporary teachers present a more realistic account of King and the movement to empower modern day activism?

    1. In and around Houston, people by the thousands took to trucks and boats to get a glimpse of the homes they had evacuated. Some stayed, others just picked up medications and family photos before heading back to shelters, and most simply could not bear to wait any longer to find out: How bad is it?

      does this work?

  2. Aug 2017
    1. we face the imminent danger of all manner of bad history repeating itself while we watch it on TV.

      Gay argues that in such troubled times, it's the responsibility of TV show writers to instead write about a hopeful future tat solves problems, instead of reiterating and promoting inflagration of the issues we already know too well.

    2. We do not make art in a vacuum isolated from sociopolitical context.

      This circles back to "The Practices of Looking" by Sturken and Cartwright which presents the idea of mimesis, or in other words, imitation between life and the media, and between the media and life.

    3. found a way to reimagine history in speculative fiction without making slavery into an intellectual exercise rather than plainly showing it as the grossly oppressive institution it was

      This clarifies the statement that I disagreed with earlier, and now I completely agree with the author. Simply putting forth representations of slavery doesn't do much good... It must challenge the world we live in today.

    4. largely replicates what actually happened, I wonder why people are expending the energy to imagine that slavery continues to thrive when we are still dealing with the vestiges of slavery in very tangible ways.

      I disagree with this statement. While I don't deny that "we are still dealing with the vestiges of slavery in very tangible ways," I see the reimagining in media as showing others through a new lens how people today still live and feel. I see it as a help, instead of a hindrance.

    5. quiet, insidious acts of violence, reminders that racial hatred is alive and well.

      These nooses have been hanging from trees every since the Klu Klux Klan- a sad reminder that we may never heal from the wounds of the past. Just like the masks of the '60s, the racists today hide behind anonymity because they know that what they're doing is wrong, but don't want to face their own ignorance.

    6. They were not the first nor will they be the last to resist acknowledging that the Confederacy lost the Civil War.

      This is an interesting way to think about how hate of this manner still survives today through the expression of Civil War memorabilia. Personally, I think that their racism shouldn't inherently be linked to the Civil War; to me, it gives blame to historical figures long gone and takes blame away from those living today and oppressing others, however, it links white supremacists with the image of stupidity and patheticness, which I kind of like

    7. I suppose it’s an interesting premise, but as is often the case with interesting premises, at what cost?

      I'm intrigued by this statement, because it reminds me that different people interpret works different ways. What some might take as a cautionary tale, others might take as inspiration. It's also dangerous for the writer/artist, as the work might subconsciously reveal the prejudices within the artist him/herself.

    1. “Our whole city is underwater right now,”

      I can't imagine living like this. That water must be filled with bacteria. How will they rebuild?

    1. If we want to use technology to help people learn, we have to provide information in the way the human mind evolved to receive it. We have to speak the mind’s language, and that includes the language not only of information but also of social cues. Failing to do so will continue to artificially limit the gains that educational technology promises to offer.

      I think it's same as when you read a book. Try to mimic and imagine the picture of the story.

    1. “I’m as anxious as anyone to see the ups and down,” she said. “I do think you will see some schools who are being challenged by this because their recruitment and catchment area very much mirrors the SUNY and CUNY areas.”

      “I’m as anxious as anyone to see the ups and down,” she said. “I do think you will see some schools who are being challenged by this because their recruitment and catchment area very much mirrors the SUNY and CUNY areas.”

    1. For months, the White House under President Trump operated with few real rules, and those were barely enforced. People wandered into the Oval Office throughout the day. The president was given pieces of unvetted information, and found more on his own that he often tweeted out. Policy decisions were often based on whoever had last gotten Mr. Trump’s attention.Mr. Trump’s Twitter habit shows little sign of abating. On vacation earlier at his private club in Bedminster, N.J., and now, ensconced again in the White House, he has been watching television — unfettered by any aides — and responding as he always has.But inside the West Wing, the president’s new chief of staff, John F. Kelly, has been trying to control the things he can. After being sworn in on July 31, he spent three weeks assessing how to create a less jumbled, chaotic churn around Mr. Trump, and how to create a system that the president’s staff will respect. In two memos sent to the staff on Monday he began to detail his plan, starting with how he wants information to get to the president, and how Mr. Trump will respond.
    1. Alaska’s PermafrostIs Thawing

      Overall scientific credibility: 'high' to 'very high', according to scientists who analyzed this article.

      evaluation card

      Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis

    1. Even after decades of affirmative action, black and Hispanic students are more underrepresented at the nation’s top colleges and universities than they were 35 years ago

      I wish this article had also looked at how much a given underrepresented group's graduation rate has changed as well (for the same group of schools). Even if a group's enrollment in top colleges has gone down, the data could show that a given group's graduation rate from those same colleges has increased over the same time period. Info on changes in enrollment and graduation rate would be so much more informative than studying each statistic alone.

    1. Reflecting on Middlebury, he told me, “Anybody whose approach to ideas that they don’t like is just to scream bloody murder has been failed in their education.” It hasn’t taught them that history is messy, society complicated and truth elusive.

      Wee bit of a straw man here, isn't it?

    2. It’s part of what some angry voters in 2016 were reacting to and rebelling against.

      Implying that progressives, safe spaces, etc. lead to the election of Trump.

    3. we’d be foolish not to treat this as a wake-up call, because it’s of a piece with some of the extraordinary demands that students at other campuses have made, and it’s the fruit of a dangerous ideological conformity in too much of higher education.

      Letting your bias slip through here, buddy.

    4. controversial social scientist

      The speaker was Charles Murray.

      Charles Murray, in short, perpetuates scientific racism, sexism, etc. He also claims that too many children are going to colleges and that, rather than attempting to educate people from all backgrounds and aptitudes, America's success as a nation depends on educating and lifting up the academically gifted.

    5. Physical safety? Absolutely.

      Might we think about how providing a platform for certain ideas and certain voices can create a physically unsafe environment?

    6. slurs

      What slurs were hurled at Charles Murray, a white academic?

      Surely we're not going to imply that Nazi, fascist, eugenicist, etc. are slurs on par with racial slurs...

    7. they should be able to purge their world of perspectives offensive to them

      The flip side of this: should we be forced to tolerate positions we vehemently oppose?

    8. students shouted down and chased away

      Many, if not all, of the students involved received punishment from the college.

    1. The noose at the Mint was particularly shocking, Ms. Sapp said, because the Mint is under heavy surveillance given its security concerns; employees know they are being recorded as they work.

      Really interesting (and frightening) that this employee went ahead and did it anyways...

    1. “The violence and deaths in Charlottesville strike at the heart of American law and justice,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. “When such actions arise from racial bigotry and hatred, they betray our core values and cannot be tolerated.” Advertisement Continue reading the main story The president remained silent on the violence for most of the morning even as House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, Mr. Trump’s wife, Melania, and dozens of other public figures condemned the march.Mrs. Trump, using her official Twitter account, wrote, “Our country encourages freedom of speech, but let’s communicate w/o hate in our hearts. No good comes from violence. #Charlottesville.”Mr. Ryan was even more explicit. “The views fueling the spectacle in Charlottesville are repugnant. Let it only serve to unite Americans against this kind of vile bigotry,” he wrote on Twitter at noon, around the time that Gov. Terry McAuliffe declared a state of emergency in the city.

      These quotes still maintain enough wiggle room ("The violence. . .strike[s] at the heart of American law and justice. . .when such actions arise from. . .hatred, they betray our core values and cannot be tolerated;" "let's communicate w/o hate in our hearts. No good comes from violence;" The views fueling the spectacle in Charlottesville. . ." etc.) to criticize the Left...

    1. This method for describing the qualities of other people can border on the sociopathic; it calls to mind, and has piqued the interest of, online pickup-artist culture.

      Gross!

    2. Stack,” in technological terms, can mean a few different things, but the most relevant usage grew from the start-up world: A stack is a collection of different pieces of software that are being used together to accomplish a task. A smartphone’s software stack, for instance, could be described as a layered structure: There’s the low-level code that controls the device’s hardware, and then, higher up, its basic operating system, and then, even higher, the software you use to message a friend or play a game. An individual application’s stack might include the programming languages used to build it, the services used to connect it to other apps or the service that hosts it online; a “full stack” developer would be someone proficient at working with each layer of that system, from bottom to top.

      Definition of a "stack"

    1. Then he whored for his Virginia winery on the way out the door

      This was his response to questions about whether he had talked with Heather Heyer's mom and visiting CVille. Asked if we knew he had a house in CVille. Disgusting!

    1. If we’re going to be the people who lead the Democratic Party back from the wilderness and lead our country out of this dark time, then we can’t waste energy arguing about whose issue matters more or who in our alliance should be voted off the island

      Amen!

    2. a rigged system

      Channeling Bernie Sanders!

    3. “The Democratic Party isn’t going back to the days of welfare reform and the crime bill,”

      Let's hope.

    4. the Clinton effort to push Democrats toward the political center should be relegated to history

      Amen.

    5. ridiculing Clinton-era policies

      Disaster for the party.

    1. Just as the hatred came from one side only, the care did not come from “many sides.”
    2. This is not about “free speech.” It never was. There is no “free speech” if anyone brandishes firearms to intimidate those they despise. You can’t argue with the armed. The Nazis told us their intentions clearly on Saturday. This, to them, is about “blood and soil.” They are serious. So are we.

      Right fucking on.

    1. “On June 16, they did what they were told,” Ms. Southerland said. “They produced a new cost-benefit analysis that showed no quantifiable benefit to preserving wetlands.

      they should have refused to do this.

    2. without any records of the changes they were being ordered to make.

      pretty sure that's illegal

    1. Mark had his own reservations. “I don’t want to do it just because it’s what we’re supposed to do,” he said. “I only want to live together if it’ll make our lives better.”

      This is so powerful... The esclator of relationships has to be actively avoided.

    2. I worried that the minutiae of domesticity would change us into petty creatures who bickered over laundry.

      It is such a common fear to assume the threat of routine to be terrible for a relationship. I know it so well...

    1. About the only thing holding it together is Idris Elba, whose irrepressible magnetism and man-of-stone solidity anchors this mess but can’t redeem it.

      Love Idris Elba!

    1. one group has never really wavered: the leaders of the conservative movement.
    2. “I’ve been to the White House I don’t know how many more times in the first six months this year than I was during the entire Bush administration,” Mr. Perkins said.

      Test for deep linking. Go here.

    1. animated his campaign last year. Critics said the proposal would undercut the fundamental vision of the United States as a haven for the poor and huddled masses, while the president and his allies said the country had taken in too many lo

      Test of deep linking.

    1. Focusing on the fundamentals of grammar is one approach to teaching writing.

      CUE ELA Protocols +UDL Research and background information that can be used to provide support for the use of the protocols

  3. Jul 2017
    1. the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military

      This certainly makes sense, given the fact that recruits are segregated based upon gender. The men have a separate living space from the women. Accommodating transgender troops would require a third solution.

    1. And he has embarked on a campaign to discredit the investigators before they can even get very far in their investigation, hoping to do to Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, what the Clintons did to Kenneth W. Starr, the independent counsel.

      This is an epically flawed analogy, and Peter Baker, as much as anyone, knows it. Whose idea was this story??? As Baker points out later on, the Clintons didn't fight the first special counsel, Robert Fiske. And they only started going after Ken Starr once Starr emerged as freakishly obsessed with finding something anything he could accuse them of -- ending up, of course, with Bill Clinton lying about sex. In short, they attacked him because he was a partisan hack who used grand-jury leaks to smear them and would stop at nothing. Hardly the same as the Mueller investigation.

    1. While innovation — the social process of introducing new things — is important, most technologies around us are old, and for the smooth functioning of daily life, maintenance is more important.

      This seems so obvious, but it's so overlooked. The addiction to constant growth and newness seems so closely tied to our ideas of how markets operate. Consumption and waste trump conservation and repair.

    1. Mr. Trump needed something substantive to prove he was making progress, according to White House aides.

      Don't you kind of want to know a bit more about the sourcing here? What kind of aides? What is their motivation in saying this to the New York Times? So much of the Trump news is coming from vaguely described anonymous somethings, it starts to lose credibility.

    2. The president — echoing his ill-received remarks about repealing the Affordable Care Act — has told people around him that he did not expect the process to be this difficult, according to one longtime adviser.

      This is highly amusing. Not credibly sourced, but certainly very credible. And I think it should have been in the lead, explaining how there is no plan and, like SO MANY OTHER THINGS, Trump has realized they are more "difficult" than he anticipated. Although that itself is a euphemism, really, for the fact that he never actually had anything beyond simplistic slogans.

    3. Mr. Trump is most concerned about being able to tell voters his plan hit the $1 trillion mark

      How can Glenn Thrush possibly know what Trump is "most concerned" about? Consider: What people around Trump say about what he's thinking is often contradicted by Trump himself -- and that what Trump himself says is often contradicted by reality. Honestly, anytime I see anyone write, without meticulous attribution, about what Trump "thinks" or is "concerned" about I write them off as credulous fools.

    4. Still, the broad outlines are slowly coming into focus. The plan would include “massive permit reform” to cut approval times on major projects to two years or less, from 10; loans and grants to improve rural infrastructure; and funding for “transformative projects,” like broadband and power grid improvements. In addition, the effort would include bolstering existing programs funded through the Finance and Innovation Act and new “incentives” to encourage states and localities to bankroll their own projects, officials said.

      OK the entire story up until now has said there is no plan, and in fact total chaos. But this paragraph suggests consensus around a number of elements. Admittedly, they are wildly vague, but where is this coming from? Note the use of "air quotes" and zero attribution. Confusing.

    5. Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, is skeptical of wedding a tax overhaul and infrastructure — or of any deal that would require him to compromise with Democrats.

      I actually like how understated this is. There is a place for that, and this is fine.

    6. Its hybrid nature is its greatest virtue. It’s also a drawback. Democrats and centrist Republicans remain skeptical of its limited scope. House conservatives remain hostile toward any big, new federal funding program.

      Virtue to who? Drawback to who? And this paragraph completely ignore the chief and very legitimate progressive concern that, to the extent there is any substance at all to Trump's infrastructure push, it is a bait-and-switch privatization scheme that would turn over government assets to Trump cronies. I understand Glenn Thrush is busy, but still. Go read Jefferson Morley or David Cay Johnston -- or sign up for In the Public Interest's newsletter.

    7. The collapse of his health care overhaul effort seemed to clear one item out of the way. But it also raised serious doubts about the ability of Republicans to pass anything other than regulatory rollbacks or routine spending bills.

      Here is an opposite problem: This story basically says, offhand: Trump's repeal of Obamacare is dead and gone and now Congress will move on to other things. The latest NYT story on health legislation on Thursday -- read it here -- said Trump and Senate Republicans want it taken up again next week. So either Glenn Thrush and the rest of the NYT Washington bureau known Trumpcare is dead and gone and off the table, and just aren't brave enough to tell the public -- or this is irresponsible shorthand.

    8. has yet to produce the detailed plan he has promised to deliver “very soon,” and the president has yet to even name any members to a new board he claimed would green-light big projects

      Again, good stuff -- but why "let the reader" figure out what is really going on, which is that there is zero evidence that there was ever any semblance of a plan. That wouldn't be hyperbole.

    9. It awaits the resolution of tough negotiations over the budget, the debt ceiling, a tax overhaul, a new push to toughen immigration laws — and the enervating slog to enact a replacement for the Affordable Care Act.

      Might be worth mentioning here that, given exactly zero major legislative achievements in six months, there's no sign he'll accomplish any of them. This sort of suggests that infrastructure will actually happen after these are taken care of. That is "normal" talk. This ain't normal.

    10. fast becoming an afterthought

      This assumes it was actually a serious thought at some point. This is a perfect example of how despite doing an excellent job of pointing out Trump's failings, it still reverts too much to the presidential norm. There is no evidence that Trump ever had more than a slogan. His whole campaign was a big con, and making it sound like he ever seriously considered this is giving him way too much credit.

    11. Trump’s ‘Great National Infrastructure Program’? Stalled

      "Stalled"?? Seriously? How about "Never Existed" or "Just Another Big Con"?

    1. looming showdown between Mr. Trump and Mr. Mueller

      This can't end well for anyone.

    2. President Trump’s lawyers and aides are scouring the professional and political backgrounds of investigators hired by the special counsel Robert S. Mueller III

      This seems to be a pattern for Trump - constantly jumping into battles in which he's overmatched. The battle of wills and trust with the former head of the FBI, Comey always seemed like a losing effort. Similarly, investigating (and thereby irritating) the investigators seems like a good way to motivate people who have made extremely successful careers in this field.

    1. Erik D. Prince, a founder of the private security firm Blackwater Worldwide,

      Even the NYT story linked to here, about Prince, is ridiculously anodyne. It says, for instance:

      Blackwater, the company Mr. Prince built into a corporate symbol of the American war in Iraq, never really recovered from the Nisour Square shootings and its many other controversies and legal woes.

      The real story, as explained by Prince's journalistic scourge, Jeremy Scahill, is more like this:

      Prince founded the notorious private security firm Blackwater, which rose to infamy in September 2007 after its operatives gunned down 17 Iraqi civilians, including a 9-year-old boy in Baghdad’s Nisour Square. Whistleblowers also alleged that Prince encouraged an environment in which Iraqis were killed for sport.

    2. Mr. Prince briefed several White House officials, including General McMaster, said a second person.

      Two other little bits of salient background:

      Washington Post, April 3:

      The United Arab Emirates arranged a secret meeting in January between Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian close to President Vladi­mir Putin as part of an apparent effort to establish a back-channel line of communication between Moscow and President-elect Donald Trump, according to U.S., European and Arab officials.

      Intercept, March 2016:

      Erik Prince, , founder of the now-defunct mercenary firm Blackwater and current chairman of Frontier Services Group, is under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies for attempting to broker military services to foreign governments and possible money laundering, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the case.

    3. While he was at Blackwater, the company became involved in one of the most notorious episodes of the Iraq war, when its employees opened fire in a Baghdad square, killing 17 civilians.

      Finally, a mention that Nisour happened "while he was at Blackwater."

    4. Soliciting the views of Mr. Prince and Mr. Feinberg certainly qualifies as out-of-the-box thinking in a process dominated by military leaders in the Pentagon and the National Security Council. But it also raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations.

      And this is as close as the story comes to opprobrium: that they could profit from their suggestions. More from Scahill:

      After 9/11, Prince worked with the CIA on a secret assassination program .... The Intercept has previously reported on Prince’s efforts to build a private air force for hire and his close ties to Chinese intelligence. One of his latest schemes is a proposal to deploy private contractors to work with Libyan security forces to stop the flow of refugees to Europe.

      Notably, in his January 2017 op-ed outlining his plan to stop the refugee flow from Northern Africa to Europe, Prince warned that "the very existence of the EU in is danger."

      Trump, in a speech said to have been written by Bannon, used similar language just last week in Poland, saying “The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive."

    5. the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems.

      The understatement, it burns.

    6. Trump Aides Recruited Businessmen to Devise Options for Afghanistan

      Wow. This headline -- and article -- make it sound like the only thing controversial about these guys is that they are selling a plan that would make them a lot of money. One of these guys is Erik D. Prince, arguably the world's most notorious mercenary.

      Ignoring that aspect of Erik Prince is not an oversight; it is a willful misrepresentation, but for what purpose? To not appear overly critical of Trump?

    1. She was expelled in her sophomore year, partly, she said, for her anti-segregationist editorials as a member of the board of the campus newspaper.

      wow, talk about a violation of the 1st Amendment

    1. It carried an urgent amber warning, the second-highest rating for the sensitivity of the threat.

      Amber sounds really scary, doesn't it?

    2. Since May, hackers have been penetrating the computer networks of companies that operate nuclear power stations and other energy facilities, as well as manufacturing plants in the United States and other countries.

      Marcy's very good point is that while this lead gives the impression that the hackers are hacking into the controls of nuclear facilities, that is in fact not what the story says if you read it carefully.

    3. In retrospect, Mr. Wellinghoff said that attack should have foreshadowed the threats the United States would face on its own infrastructure.

      As Marcy points out, she is not arguing that Russian spying on how our nuclear facilities work is not without risk.

      It does carry risks that they are collecting the information so they can one day sabotage our facilities. But if we want to continue spying on North Korea’s or Iran’s nuclear program, we would do well to remember that we consider spying on nuclear facilities — even by targeting the engineers that run them — squarely within the bounds of acceptable international spying. By all means we should try to thwart this presumed Russian spying. But we should not suggest — as the NYT seems to be doing — that this amounts to sabotage, to the kinds of things we did with StuxNet, because doing so is likely to lead to very dangerous escalation.

      And it’s not just me saying that. Robert M. Lee, who works on cyber defense for the energy industry and who recently authored a report on Crash Override, Russia’s grid-targeting sabotage tradecraft (and as such would have been an obvious person to cite in this article) had this to say:

      So while the threat to nuclear from cyber is a real concern because of impact it’s very improbable and “what about Stuxnet” is a high bar

      Or said more simply: phishing emails are lightyears removed from “what about Stuxnet” arguments. It’s simply otherworldly in comparison.

      There’s one more, very real reason why the NYT should have been far more responsible in clarifying that this is collection, not sabotage. Among the things Shadow Brokers, with its presumed ties to Russia, has been threatening to expose is “compromised network data from Russian, Chinese, Iranian, or North Korean nukes and missile programs.” If the NYT starts inflating the threat from cyber collection on nuclear facilities, it could very easily lead to counter-inflation, with dangerous consequences for the US and its ability to monitor our adversaries.

      There is very real reason to be concerned that Russia — or some other entity — is collecting information on how our nuclear and other power facilities work. But, as Lee notes, conflating that with StuxNet is “otherworldly.”

    4. In some cases, the hackers also compromised legitimate websites that they knew their victims frequented — something security specialists call a watering hole attack.

      Here's Marcy:

      That is, even while screaming “Amber Russian bear OMIGOSH StuxNet!!” the article admitted that this is not StuxNet. This amounts to spies, quite possibly Russian, “hunting SysAdmins,” just like the United States does (of course, the US and its buddy Israel also assassinate nuclear engineers, which for all its known assassinations, Russia is not known to have done).

      That distinction is utterly critical to make, no matter how much you want to fearmonger with readers who don’t understand the distinction.

      There is spying — the collection of information on accepted targets. And there is sabotage — the disruption of critical processes for malicious ends.

      This is spying, what our own cyber doctrine calls “Cyber Collection.”

      Cyber Collection: Operations and related programs or activities conducted by or on behalf of the United States Government, in or through cyberspace, for the primary purpose of collecting intelligence – including information that can be used for future operations – from computers, information or communications systems, or networks with the intent to remain undetected. Cyber collection entails accessing a computer, information system, or network without authorization from the owner or operator of that computer, information system, or network or from a party to a communication or by exceeding authorized access. Cyber collection includes those activities essential and inherent to enabling cyber collection, such as inhibiting detection or attribution, even if they create cyber effects. ( C/NF)

    5. Hackers Are Targeting Nuclear Facilities, Homeland Security Dept. and F.B.I. Say

      "NYT fearmongers nukes" is how blogger Marcy Wheeler (emptywheel) puts it in a great takedown post of this story, which I am turning into annotations as a proof of concept.

  4. Jun 2017
    1. Instructors are required to sign an employment agreement that includes a noncompete clause that prevents them from working at other nearby schools for a year after they leave.

      WTF?!

    2. connectedness and mutually beneficial relationships

      Was community just not prioritized in Bridge schools? Was it all just top down?

    3. The impact of the bouncy castle and the waived fees,

      !?

    4. None of the founders had traditional teaching experience

      Yikes. Foreshadowing?

    1. 95-Degree Days: How Extreme Heat Could Spread Across the World

      Overall scientific credibility: 'high', according to scientists who analyzed this article.

      evaluation card

      Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis

    2. Global warming under Paris pledges

      There is a risk that some people might confuse the term "Paris pledges" with the 1.5- and 2-degree targets that came out of the Paris Agreement.

    3. That’s likely to rise to a range of 137 to 200 days per year.

      The article doesn't hide the fact that there is fairly high uncertainty in these projections. This helps the reader understand the confidence in the projected changes.

    4. In this scenario, countries would take some measures, but not drastic ones, to curb emissions — roughly the trajectory of the current pledges under the Paris climate agreement.

      The map is based on the medium-emissions trajectory of RCP4.5, which is roughly in line with the combined current pledges from the Paris Agreement. It would be useful if the article noted that this trajectory is not in line with either the 1.5- or 2-degree global warming targets from the Paris Agreement.

    1. The Galápagos are an archipelago of 20 islands, originally called the Enchanted Islands, and made famous by Charles Darwin, who visited the islands in 1835, later formulating his theory of evolution based on his trip.

      Galapagos--on the bucket list!

    1. it is futile to resist them.

    2. it will require whole new ways to think about pensions, health care, benefits, sick leave, disability and retirement savings.

      Right. Or avoiding thinking about/doing these things entirely.

    3. disrupting not only old industries but also the entire concept of work.

      That is, labor.

    4. a radical expansion of freedom and a liberating empowerment of individuals to supply services as they please, without government interference.

      Hmmm...

    5. The benefits that Airbnb and Uber pioneered go beyond convenience. They allow people to make human connections in an era that has become much more institutionalized in the decades since family-run bed-and-breakfasts began being replaced by standardized hotel chains.

      Interesting point...but nore sure I buy it. There's probably more human connection in renting a hotel, interacting with the staff and possibly other guests, then the often automater entry one has to an Airbnb property. Only on a couple of occasions have I had genuine interaction with my rentee.

    6. Travis’s Law,” Stone writes. “It went something like this: Our product is so superior to the status quo that if we give people the opportunity to see it or try it, in any place in the world where government has to be at least somewhat responsive to the people, they will demand it and defend its right to exist.” He was right.

      Yuck.

    7. a techno-libertarianism that was contemptuous of most government attempts to regulate disruptive innovation.

      Turns out this has been a bad look. I wonder if it'll really cost Uber, though.

    8. radical libertarian ideology and monopolistic greed of many Silicon Valley entrepreneurs helped to decimate the livelihood of musicians and is now undermining the communal idealism of the early internet.

      Truth.

    1. When Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. visited Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute last month, he was asked a startling question, one with overtones of science fiction.“Can you foresee a day,” asked Shirley Ann Jackson, president of the college in upstate New York, “when smart machines, driven with artificial intelligences, will assist with courtroom fact-finding or, more controversially even, judicial decision-making?”

      For Introduction

    1. President Trump, in a statement from the White House, said the shooting suspect had died. Law enforcement authorities identified him as James T. Hodgkinson, 66, from Belleville, Ill., a suburb of St. Louis.

      It was a white guy.

    1. Less Tweeting, Lawyers Beg

      This bold assertion is nowhere supported by actual quotes from actual people. Instead, we are supposed to trust in the omnscience of Baker and Thrush. But if they're so able to reach conclusions without worrying about attribution, why aren't they brave enough to state some of the other obvious things about Trump and his tweets: How most of them are lies; how they are deranged; how he is unhinged in his focus on having won the election. Or, generally, how nothing he says can be trusted

    2. hopes that Mr. Trump had turned a page

      Whose hopes?

    3. demonstrated that he can tame his Twitter impulses

      Or did he simply not have signal? I am only half-joking

    4. Mr. Trump’s aides, especially his White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, have long implored the president to cut down on his tweeting, especially about the Russia investigations.

      Stated as fact.

    5. lawyers

      Which lawyers? Presumably "some" of the "every lawyer[s] consulte by White House aides in recent days." Or maybe not.

    6. some lawyers sai

      "some lawyers said"???

    7. Every lawyer consulted by White House aides in recent days has made the same point about the president’s tweets: He can power through the investigations, but he is his own worst enemy if he continues to vent online.

      Note the complete lack of attribution. We are instead supposed to credit Bake and Thrush with omniscience.

  5. May 2017
    1. New York Democrats See Special Election Win as Good Sign for ’18

      It seems I can't select anything from a New York Times article to annotate except the title. :(

    1. from the investigation

      Here is some math. $$\varepsilon = \frac{2}{h^3} \int_0^{p_F} \sqrt{p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4} \cdot 4 \pi p^2 dp=$$ $$\frac{8 \pi}{h^3} \frac{m c^2}{\lambda^3} \int_0^x \sqrt{1+y^2} \cdot y^2 dy$$

    1. Using data from a large Danish health study, researchers have found an association between chocolate consumption and a lowered risk for atrial fibrillation, the irregular heartbeat that can lead to stroke, heart failure and other serious problems.
    1. Racing to Find Answers in the Ice

      Overall scientific credibility: 'high' to 'very high', according to 9 scientists who analyzed this article.

      card

      Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis

    2. the shelf seems stable now, but computer forecasts suggest that it might be vulnerable to rapid collapse in the next few decades

      Using the geological record of Antarctic Ice Sheet behavior, the Ross Ice Shelf has collapsed in the past (Yokoyama et al., 2016, PNAS), likely in response to ocean and atmosphere warming. Therefore, we know that the Ross Ice Shelf, which currently protects large portion of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (Fürst et al., 2016, Nature Climate Change), is susceptible to collapse.

    3. vulnerable parts of the ice sheet

      The vulnerable parts of the ice sheet are those that resting on beds that are below sea level; therefore, the ice itself is in contact with a warming ocean. The majority of the West Antarctic and ~30% of the East Antarctic sectors of the ice sheet are grounded below sea level.

    4. Right now, the shelf works like a giant bottle-stopper that slows down ice trying to flow from the land into the sea. If it collapses, the ice could flow into the ocean more rapidly, an effect that has already happened on a much smaller scale in other areas of Antarctica.

      Several glaciers that had previously been buttressed by the Larsen B ice shelf accelerated by a factor eight after said ice shelf disintegrated. The demise of this ice shelf lead to an increase of 27km3 of ice loss per year (Rignot et al., GRL 2004).

    5. The acceleration is making some scientists fear that Antarctica’s ice sheet may have entered the early stages of an unstoppable disintegration.

      This is based on a combination of observations and modelling (see e.g. Joughin et al., Science 2014). Observations show us several glaciers are in decline (e.g. Rignot et al., GRL 2014) and ice shelves, which serve as a buttress for the glaciers, are thinning due to warmer sea water. This process is seen to be accelerating (e.g. Paolo et al., Science 2105). Where ice shelves (like Larsen B) have already vanished, glaciers in the hinterland have indeed sped up (Scambos et al., GRL 2004). Numerical models predict that the changes underway now are likely to lead to a full-scale collapse of the west Antarctic Ice Sheet.

    6. The most vulnerable parts of the West Antarctic ice sheet could raise the sea level by 10 to 15 feet, inundating many of the world’s coastal cities, though most scientists think that would take well over a century, or perhaps longer. They are worried about a possible rise of as much as six feet by the end of this century.

      Six feet by 2100 is a very high estimate; the earlier mentioned study by DeConto and Pollard doesn't go above 1.5 m under 936 ppm atmospheric CO2. At 538 ppm their estimates don't go above 86 cm by 2100.

    7. In the scientists’ worst-case computer simulations, continued global warming will cause the Ross Ice Shelf to weaken and collapse starting as early as the middle of this century.

      This collapse in the referenced work is initiated by strong surface melting causing ice shelf hydrofracture and then marine ice cliff instability. Other recent studies looking at the evolution of surface melt in Antarctica find far more modest (likely insignificant) increases in surface melt over this century, particularly over the Ross ice shelf.

    8. Because the collapse of vulnerable parts of the ice sheet could raise the sea level dramatically, the continued existence of the world’s great coastal cities — Miami, New York, Shanghai and many more — is tied to Antarctica’s fate.

      This is the prime motive of understanding Antarctic ice sheet dynamics, especially since the far-field location gives Antarctica relatively more weight to sea level rise along many northern hemisphere cities than Greenland.

    9. The acceleration is making some scientists fear that Antarctica’s ice sheet may have entered the early stages of an unstoppable disintegration.

      This is true, but referring to West Antarctic ice sheet would be more precise.

    10. The contribution from Greenland (GrIS) and Antarctic (AIS) Ice Sheet mass loss has increased since the early 1990s, comprising ~19% of the total observed rise in GMSL between 1993 and 2010 and ~40% of the total observed rise in GMSL between 2003 and 2008 (Cazenave et al., 2009; Helm et al., 2014). GrIS and AIS contributions are projected to become increasingly important over the 21st century (IPCC, 2013) and dominate sea-level rise uncertainty in the second half of the 21st century (Kopp et al., 2014; Cornford et al., 2015).

    11. Process-based predictions of sea-level rise by the International climate panel (ie the IPCC) are limited by uncertainties surrounding the response of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets (Pfeffer et al., 2008; Pritchard et al., 2012; Rignot et al., 2011), steric changes (Domingues et al., 2008; Marcelja, 2010), contributions from mountain glaciers (Raper and Braithwaite, 2009), as well as from groundwater pumping for irrigation purposes and storage of water in reservoirs (Konikow, 2011; Pokhrel et al., 2012; Wada et al., 2012). In large part because of the limitations of physical process models, IPCC AR5 does not offer “very likely” (5th to 95th percentile) sea-level projections, but concluded that “there is currently insufficient evidence to evaluate the probability of specific levels above the assessed likely range” (Summary for Policy Makers, p. 18).

    12. But as the ice age ended and the oceans warmed, all of them collapsed.

      "collapse" is commonly taken to mean "fail suddenly and completely", but in the context of ice sheets the scientific use of "collapse" can encompass much longer timescales (even multiple centuries) and it would be informative to make this clear. For example, IPCC AR5 WGI (Chapter 13 on sea level change) use it this way:

      Future climate forcing could trigger such an unstable collapse, which may then continue independently of climate. This potential collapse might unfold over centuries for individual bedrock troughs in West Antarctica and sectors of East Antarctica.

      Without this clarification, "collapse" may be misinterpreted to mean something happening over timescales of a single decade or much shorter timescales -- especially when combined with earlier language about refugees "fleeing inland" due to a "rapid disintegration".

    13. But some research suggests that a catastrophe might not yet be inevitable. In a study last year, Robert M. DeConto of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and David Pollard of Pennsylvania State University used their computer model to predict what would happen if emissions were reduced sharply over the next few decades, in line with international climate goals.

      In line with the IPCC efforts, policymakers should be informed from multiple scientific studies and not a single modeling group.

    14. Right now, the shelf works like a giant bottle-stopper that slows down ice trying to flow from the land into the sea. If it collapses, the ice could flow into the ocean more rapidly, an effect that has already happened on a much smaller scale in other areas of Antarctica. The most vulnerable parts of the West Antarctic ice sheet could raise the sea level by 10 to 15 feet, inundating many of the world’s coastal cities, though most scientists think that would take well over a century, or perhaps longer. They are worried about a possible rise of as much as six feet by the end of this century.
    15. The warmer water seems to be doing the most damage to a series of glaciers that flow into a region of West Antarctica called the Amundsen Sea. Satellites have identified the most rapid loss of ice there, raising a critical question: Has an unstoppable collapse of the ice sheet already begun?
    16. But the story is not straightforward, and the warmer water attacking the ice has not been linked to global warming — at least not directly. The winds around the continent seem to be strengthening, stirring the ocean and bringing up a layer of warmer water that has most likely been there for centuries. Are those stronger winds tied to human-caused global warming? Some scientists think so, but others say the case is unproven. “We’re not sure because we don’t have enough data, for long enough, to separate signal from noise,” said Eric J. Steig, a scientist at the University of Washington who has studied temperature trends in Antarctica.
    17. The acceleration is making some scientists fear that Antarctica’s ice sheet may have entered the early stages of an unstoppable disintegration. Because the collapse of vulnerable parts of the ice sheet could raise the sea level dramatically, the continued existence of the world’s great coastal cities — Miami, New York, Shanghai and many more — is tied to Antarctica’s fate.
    18. Already, scientists know enough to be concerned. About 120,000 years ago, before the last ice age, the planet went through a natural warm period, with temperatures similar to those expected in coming decades. The sea level was 20 to 30 feet higher than it is today, implying that the ice sheets in both Greenland and Antarctica must have partly disintegrated, a warning of what could occur in the relatively near future if the heating of the planet continues unchecked.
    19. Though the role of global warming is unclear now, it is likely to be a factor in the relatively near future. Many experts think warmer air temperatures could start to weaken the ice of West Antarctica from above, even as warmer ocean water attacks it from below. The warmer water seems to be doing the most damage to a series of glaciers that flow into a region of West Antarctica called the Amundsen Sea. Satellites have identified the most rapid loss of ice there, raising a critical question: Has an unstoppable collapse of the ice sheet already begun?
    20. But the story is not straightforward, and the warmer water attacking the ice has not been linked to global warming — at least not directly. The winds around the continent seem to be strengthening, stirring the ocean and bringing up a layer of warmer water that has most likely been there for centuries. Are those stronger winds tied to human-caused global warming? Some scientists think so, but others say the case is unproven. “We’re not sure because we don’t have enough data, for long enough, to separate signal from noise,” said Eric J. Steig, a scientist at the University of Washington who has studied temperature trends in Antarctica.
    21. Incorporating recent advances in the understanding of how ice sheets might break apart, they found that both West Antarctica and some vulnerable parts of East Antarctica would go into an unstoppable collapse if the Earth continued to warm at a rapid pace. In their worst-case scenario, the sea level could rise by six feet by the end of this century, and the pace could pick up drastically in the 22nd century. Dr. DeConto and Dr. Pollard do not claim that this is a certainty — they acknowledge that their analysis is still rough — but they argue that the possibility should be taken seriously.
    22. Remote as Antarctica may seem, every person in the world who gets into a car, eats a steak or boards an airplane is contributing to the emissions that put the frozen continent at risk. If those emissions continue unchecked and the world is allowed to heat up enough, scientists have no doubt that large parts of Antarctica will melt into the sea. But they do not know exactly what the trigger temperature might be, or whether the recent acceleration of the ice means that Earth has already reached it.
    23. Recent computer forecasts suggest that if greenhouse gas emissions continue at a high level, parts of Antarctica could break up rapidly, causing the ocean to rise six feet or more by the end of this century. That is double the maximum increase that an international climate panel projected only four years ago. But those computer forecasts were described as crude even by the researchers who created them. “We could be decades too fast, or decades too slow,” said one of them, Robert M. DeConto of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. “There are still some really big question marks about the trajectory of future climate around Antarctica.”
    24. The acceleration is making some scientists fear that Antarctica’s ice sheet may have entered the early stages of an unstoppable disintegration. Because the collapse of vulnerable parts of the ice sheet could raise the sea level dramatically, the continued existence of the world’s great coastal cities — Miami, New York, Shanghai and many more — is tied to Antarctica’s fate.
    1. fenced-off ghetto

      Gated luxury community?

    2. “Ad-driven systems can only reward attention,” Mr. Williams says. “They can’t reward the right answer. Consumer-paid systems can. They can reward value. The inevitable solution: People will have to pay for quality content.”

      Is there a third option? Or a middle path?

    3. The inevitable solution: People will have to pay for quality content.”

      And services?

    4. Now that we’ve made sharing information virtually effortless, how do we increase depth of understanding,

      ANNOTATION!

    5. because humans are humans,” he says. “There’s a lock on our office door and our homes at night. The internet was started without the expectation that we’d have to do that online.

      Sigh.

    6. One story was about a retired Army colonel named Dave Hughes who wanted to hook up all 5.5 billion brains on the planet. No farmer’s kid need ever be lonely again.

      Andreessen's life story resonates here...

    7. As news becomes more visually oriented, the site stays focused on words.

      Respect.

    8. “If I learn that every time I drive down this road I’m going to see more and more car crashes,” he says, “I’m going to take a different road.”

      Overlaying Frost here, we'd call this "the road less traveled." It's not an intuitive choice, but it's become a value we as a society embrace.

    9. The trouble with the internet, Mr. Williams says, is that it rewards extremes.

      This seems more a cultural rather than a technical challenge.

    1. "that the river's interest is their own interest"

      Key to everything.

    2. "In part it's cultural: Building a house out of brawny concrete has come to be viewed by many as a matter of prestige."

      Cultural influence on choosing concrete.

    3. "both rivers are heavily mined"

      At first glance it looks like industry is to blame--but it is the poor people that are doing it. Hard to blame them though.

    1. they do not constitute an obstruction of justice.

      Even taken in the larger context?! Later firing the man, Confessing on national TV that his intent in doing so was partially to stop the investigation into his campaign?!...

    2. are routinely made to investigators and prosecutors.

      Trump is not a lawyer.

    3. But telling the F.B.I. director that someone is a “good guy”

      Let's focus on the second half of the statement.

    4. Indeed, when President Obama endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in June 2016 — during the height of the F.B.I.’s investigation into Secretary Clinton’s private email server

      Not really a fair comparison, a direct, private 1:1 statement versus a public indircetly related one.

    5. As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, “for bribery there must be a quid pro quo — a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act.”

      Like someone's job, for example, and whether they keep it or lose it?

    1. “You’re watching an obstruction of justice investigation developing in real time,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “If there were ever any question about the need for an independent special prosecutor, this report is the nail on the argument.”
    1. a paper trail Mr. Comey created documenting what he perceived as the president’s improper efforts to influence a continuing investigation
    2. the clearest evidence that the president has tried to directly influence the Justice Department and F.B.I. investigation into links between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia.
    3. In testimony to the Senate last week, the acting F.B.I. director, Andrew G. McCabe, said, “There has been no effort to impede our investigation to date.”

      that he knew of apparently

    1. There is a growing sense that Mr. Trump seems unwilling or unable to do the things necessary to keep himself out of trouble, and that the presidency has done little to tame a shoot-from-the-hip-into-his-own-foot style that characterized his campaign.

      NAH, REALLY? DID THEY EVEN PAY ATTENTION TO HIS CAMPAIGN?

    2. after Washington Post reporters informed them of an article they were writing that first reported the news about the president’s divulging of intelligence.

      huh, why would they do that?

    1. Representative Trey Gowdy, Republican of South Carolina, has also said he does not want to be considered for the job, which became open when President Trump fired James B. Comey last week.

      Good

    1. Evidence That Robots Are Winning the Race for American Jobs

      I plan to use this article in inquiry to protect more evidence that robots are taking over American jobs. This article confirms some of the things mentioned previously in the other articles and is just another source that can verify most of the information that I have collected from other sources. It also talks about some more things that robots can do, which I might include somewhere else on the paper along with some of the other examples I collected.

    2. But that paper was a conceptual exercise. The new one uses real-world data — and suggests a more pessimistic future. The researchers said they were surprised to see very little employment increase in other occupations to offset the job losses in manufacturing.

      One of the more popular arguments for an optimistic future in wake of technological advancements in the workplace is that in new jobs will be created for humans as the robots take over our old ones. However, this article is relevant to my inquiry because it states that researchers have found that there has been very little employment increase in other occupations to account for the jobs that are being lost to technology.

    3. The industry most affected by automation is manufacturing. For every robot per thousand workers, up to six workers lost their jobs and wages fell by as much as three-fourths of a percent

      This is relevant to my inquiry because my inquiry asks how technology affecting our nations industries and this article states that in the manufacturing field, automation is so bad that for every robot per thousand workers; as many as six people end up out of a job. The article states later on that it appears to be the first study that quantifies large, direct, and negative effects of robots.