for 
- adjacency - I-me relationship - William James - subject-object dualism - experience vs conceptualisation of experience - finger pointing to the moon - subject / I am phenomenologically mysterious - Indyweb annotation vs Innotation - object-of-study focal shift - definition - potential vs kinetic adjacencies 
adjacency 
- between 
    - I-me relationship
    - William James 
    - subject-object dualism 
    - the eye cannot see itself
    - self consciousness
    - experience vs conceptualisation of experience
    - Indyweb annotation vs Innotation 
    - object-of-study focal shift
    - definition  potential adjacencies
    - definition kinetic adjacencies
- adjacency relationship 
    - William James's I-me relationship is about the paradox of self consciousness
    - modern humans distinguish themselves through excelling in cognitive abilities
    - but what happens when we turn this cognitive abilities onto ourselves? 
    - Self consciousness is what results
        - reasoning about the reasoner
    - Just as the eye cannot truly see itself, the reasoner who reasons about him/her self cannot really do so because the "I" is NOT really the same as the "me"
    - the subject is not the object, 
        - the act of framing is not the frame
        - the qualia is NOT the same as the idea that represents the qualia
        - the moon is not the finger pointing to the moon
    - hence the I, the act of framing the subject is phenomenologically mysterious
    - In contrast, in indyweb, we can replace annotation with Innotation, an inline version of annotation
        - This is because of the recursive nature of learning of ideas
        - When we digest an idea, that has an externalised (re)presentation, and it triggers the emergence of a new idea, 
            - We can capture the newly inspired idea a an inline Innotation instead of a side bar annotation. 
            - The reason why we would do this is because this is more homeomorphic to how knowledge context switches its role 
                - from an active new insight
                - to an existing cultural artefact / object that can be digested by another mind
    - The difference is the idea
        - as a spontaneous emergent, embodied, enactive real-time 
, LIVING experience, which then becomes, post experience, an idea that is
        - a DEAD cultural artefact that is ready to be digested and potentially evoke a new strong LIVING response in another consciousness
    - The idea as a linguistically constructed cultural artefact is DEAD 
        - until it interacts with another consciousness,
    - and at such time, the cultural artefact can deliver upon itz intended promise and potential, and trigger a LIVING learned experience.
    - Innotation converts the once LIVING experience of the idea at the moment of birth / Inception to the form of existing, timebound knowledge test to do the same in the future,  when new minds may stumble upon it
- Learning from linguistic cultural artefacts is thus 
    - the act of conversion of 
        - potential adjacencies into 
        - kinetic adjacencies