If you want to mimic a more production like situation you might use this workflow: Create a package of your submodule locally: cd /path/to/your/module npm pack This will create a .tgz file of your package in /path/to/your/module Install the local package of the submodule in your application: cd /path/to/your/application npm install /path/to/your/module/<YourModule>-<YourModulesVersion>.tgz

I have one Gatsby site left that I haven't touched in years, I doubt it will get past npm install.

I develop in Node and Sveltekit regularly and the chances that on any given day my flow might be crushed by random madness is unacceptably high.

every time i run npm install i am prepared to embark on a bunch of side missions.

Not only this. Try to change the app two years later. Dependencies gone, wrong NPM version, Webpack config depricated and what not.That's why I like to use vanilla JS as much as possible. It will be maintainable years later.

corriger les effets pervers de la trop grande tendance du NPM à parcelliser l’action administrative

Other package managers such as Yarn and pnmp already ship with Workspaces for quite a while now.

Why is it big news? Because the main advantage of npm over other package managers like yarn or pnpm is that it comes bundled with NodeJS.

A really good question. Sad to realise that there is no feature equivalent for package.json to what we have in Gemfiles.

npm install <folder>: Install the package in the directory as a symlink in the current project. Its dependencies will be installed before it's linked. If <folder> sits inside the root of your project, its dependencies may be hoisted to the top-level node_modules as they would for other types of dependencies.

The local package will be copied to the prefix (./node-modules).

The answer for me is @whitecolor's yalc.

But this solution has technical complications, and the npm and the yarn implimentations give people trouble (as of this writing there are about 40 open npm link issues and over 150 open yarn link issues). If you have tried to use symlinked dependencies while developing a package you've probably run into into a stumbling block, whether simply an unexpected unlink behavior, trouble with peer dependencies, or something bigger.

What is that npx thing? npx ships with npm and lets you run locally installed tools. We’ll leave off the npx part for brevity throughout the rest of this file! Note: If you forget to install Prettier first, npx will temporarily download the latest version. That’s not a good idea when using Prettier, because we change how code is formatted in each release! It’s important to have a locked down version of Prettier in your package.json. And it’s faster, too.

You might get the impression after reading David's article above that this trend arose from lazy developers who "forgot how to program", but the reality is that the tiny-module ecosystem on NPM was the intention from the beginning

Does anyone know how to make npm use a specific fork containing a bug fix while waiting for maintainer to merge a pull request? I was just going to point my package.json to this fork, like this: "svelte-material-ui": "https://github.com/vtpatrickeddy/svelte-material-ui.git#patch-1", but that doesn't work because the repo is a monorepo. And there doesn't appear to be a way to specify a subdirectory inside it, like: "@smui/textfield": "https://github.com/vtpatrickeddy/svelte-material-ui.git/packages/textarea#patch-1",

Familiar npm inspired dependency management.

esy is like npm for native code

Use a node-style require() to organize your browser code and load modules installed by npm.

For those of you trying to get this to work using npm, "resolutions" only work in yarn. You need npm-force-resolutions to use it with npm.

I pushed the build files & tested it in my environment so this should work as is.

I pushed a hotfix, based on v3.6.3 proposed by #2086 (comment) In package.json, under devDependencies, use: "svelte": "btakita/svelte#svelte-gh-2086-hotfix"

From npm@5.2.0, npm ships with npx package which lets you run commands from a local node_modules/.bin or from a central cache.

By default, npx will check whether <command> exists in $PATH, or in the local project binaries, and execute that. Calling npx <command> when <command> isn't already in your $PATH will automatically install a package with that name from the NPM registry for you, and invoke it. When it's done, the installed package won’t be anywhere in your globals, so you won’t have to worry about pollution in the long-term. You can prevent this behaviour by providing --no-install option.

Something to be aware of when you’re using any bundler: there’s very little consistency when it comes to how modules are packaged in NPM. It’s incredibly frustrating, especially considering many of us write modules these days using ESM. Here’s some various problems that come up:

But this is only a halfway decent way to clarify that this is an external dependency, because the only way to resolve a peer dependency warning is to install react from npm—there's no way to notify npm that you resolve the dependency to a browser global. So peer dependencies should be avoided in favor of external declarations. Then Rollup will take care of warning about "unresolved dependencies", even if external declarations can't express a particular version range with which your library is compatible like peer dependencies can.

We must always return at least some validation rule. So first off if value !== undefined then we'll return our previous validation schema. If it is undefined then we'll use the yup.mixed().notRequired() which will just inform yup that nothing is required at the optionalObject level. optionalObject: yup.lazy(value => { if (value !== undefined) { return yup.object().shape({ otherData: yup.string().required(), }); } return yup.mixed().notRequired(); }),

passing the context into validateSync()

Yup.ref('value')

For everyone else, npm run build will bundle your component's source code into a plain JavaScript module (dist/index.mjs) and a UMD script (dist/index.js). This will happen automatically when you publish your component to npm, courtesy of the prepublishOnly hook in package.json.

For a non-monorepo package you can simply point directly to the Github repo. This case is similar, but you want to scope it just to a single package within the repo. For those that make monorepos they don't necessarily need this feature. It's for those that use projects that use monorepos. Telling them to not organize their projects into monorepos doesn't help people who make use of these projects.

If npm installs a git repo, it assumes that the git repo is the package. I don't really know how we could specify a sub-path easily, since all parts of the git url are already used for other things.

This is more a rhetoric question as this seems to be quite hard ;-) There is a long discussion about installing a subfolder of a repository and monorepos in general at the NPM Github issues (yarn misses this feature, too). The thing is that this makes it quite hard to report issues of your project as one can't test the current master easily. Do you recommend a way how to use the latest Github version?

CLI documentation > CLI commands

200 megabytes is not that bad. I’ve seen it rise above 700 MB easily.

scripts are plenty powerful and often easier to live with.

GitHub Packages uses the native package tooling commands you're already familiar with to publish and install package versions.

The url also contains an optional refspec (#v0.0.1) that tells npm which branch, commit, or in this case tag you want to have checked out.

"neutrino-patch": "git+https://github.com/davidje13/neutrino-patch#semver:^1.0.1"

npm install --save git+https://github.com/davidje13/neutrino-patch#semver:^1.0.1

But what you absolutely should do is test your NPM package in its published format. Create some smoke tests that reside in the actual codebase, but are not part of the test suite.

npm-run-all is a CLI tool to run multiple npm-scripts in parallel or sequentially

Option to run NPM scripts for a folder#

Popout

setState({isOpen: true}