The main purpose of this article was to address evidence that robots are winning the race for American jobs, similar to what the title of the article states. It talks about evidence from papers published by reputable authors that suggest that human jobs especially in the field of manufacturing are being significantly taken away by robots. The article also talks about industrial robots being used in the manufacturing of electronics, metal products, plastics and chemicals. The article says that robots have the ability to operate without human interference and do jobs such as weld, paint, and package.

It's too late

This is some BS

So the Google strategy does have its roots in higher ed, though it is now most identified with K-12.

Ha! This is one of Roger Schenck's familiar examples in his criticisms of schooling...

Nick Carr would likely have something to say on this topic.

I'm not sure that I agree that these terms line up with those above. "Knowledgeable citizens" know math formulas rather than problem-solving?

This is a fascinating claim. Left uninterrogated, it sounds great to me!

Is this the Google version of the LMS?

The Republican's Guide to Presidential Behavior

Simplify the tax code.

Evolve public accounting/finance into a more real-time, open, and interactive public service. Transaction-level financial data should be available internally and externally.

Participatory budgeting and other forms of public input should be well-factored into the public-planning process. 21st century government participation can be simplified and enriched at the same time.

which loopholes?

• this sounds like a good thing

correlated? causative?

complexity in law, leads to more logic to parse and process - therefore more potential ambiguity in human-processing.

does software engineering practices about code complexity (or lack thereof) have fruitful applications here?

This may be a front group. Investigate, find additional sources, and leave research notes in the comments.

This is interesting in that it is techinically accurate - the difference between the groups was statistically not significant at p=0.06. "A new diagnosis of cancer was confirmed in 109 participants, 45 (3.89%) in the vitamin D3 + calcium group and 64 (5.58%) in the placebo group (difference, 1.69% [95% CI, -0.06% to 3.46%]; P = .06)"

The key points is that cancer is that only 5% of people in the study got a new diagnosis of cancer in 4 years, which is a small percentage, and yet the p value was very close to significance.

Now, non-signifcant is non-significant, however it is unfortunately incredibly common for studies to report higher p valiues as a trend towards significant, a clinically significant change that almost reached statistical significance etc. That the authors adhered so strictly to the standards for significance in the case of vtiamin D, where so few do anymore in other studies, is curious.

This study is one of a number recently that for some incomprehensible reason has decided that monthly dosing of vitamin D is perfectly fine to test. "Interventions Oral vitamin D3 in an initial dose of 200 000 IU, followed a month later by monthly doses of 100 000 IU, or placebo for a median of 3.3 years (range, 2.5-4.2 years)."

The conclusion from this study is valid only for monthly dosing, not for daily dosing.

Another example of a study that used monthly dosing and saw a negative effect in falls in elderly - http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7148

This is just a straight out lie, as well as an example of misdirection. There are an incredible amount of trials showing associations between low vitamin D levels and various diseases such as cancer, heart disease, depression. Randomized trials are not the only evidence. However, there are randomized trials - as an example - "Cancer incidence was lower in women who received vitamin D/calcium than in those who received the placebo (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46-0.99; P < 0.05). When analysis was confined to cancers diagnosed after the first year, the HR for the group who received vitamin D/calcium was 0.65 (95% CI = 0.42 to 0.99; P <0.05). In proportional hazards modeling, both treatment group and serum 25(OH)D concentration after one year of intervention were significant predictors of cancer risk. Conclusions Supplementing with 2000 IU/day of vitamin D3 and 1500 mg/day of calcium substantially reduced risk of all cancers combined. This finding provides great impetus for improving vitamin D status through advances in vitamin D nutritional policy." https://apha.confex.com/apha/144am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/368368

Interestingly, the site they are linking to is the Vitamin D council, which gives very clear information on the benefits of Vitamin D. In this case they are linking specifically to an article on high levels of vitamin D that more so informs how difficult it is to become toxic from vitamin D, and that without resulting hypercalcemia, it is not likely an issue

I would argue that. There are over 70,000 studies in the literature on vitamin D, and many of them show positive associations between vitamin D status and various conditions. Too many to go into. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=vitamin+D

This is a combination of several logical fallacies- https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority

Vitamin D deficiency has been shown to be prevalent in people with fatigue, and correction of the deficiency improves the fatigue- "Results:

Prevalence of low vitamin D was 77.2% in patients who presented with fatigue. After normalization of vitamin D levels fatigue symptom scores improved significantly (P < 0.001) in all five subscale categories of fatigue assessment questionnaires.

Conclusion:

The prevalence of low vitamin D is high in patients who present with fatigue and stable chronic medical conditions, if any. Normalization of vitamin D levels with ergocalciferol therapy significantly improves the severity of their fatigue symptoms." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158648/

Of not also is that the researchers used ergocalciferol, the synthetic D2 form which is less effective than the cholecalciferol D3 form - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15531486 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21177785

hello

Comparing two volcanos on the same island

So, in Ant Man, there is the same thing with Michael Douglas. I totally think it will be a common thing. Not just for flashbacks but for actors who want to play the role "younger."

measure

quote from John Sifton.

This should be sounding loud warning bells!

Facebook algorithmically prioritises user interactions with Facebook

I'm no expert, but is this really the case?

How can a party that claims to value reducing the deficit significantly increase the national debt?

I really do feel like a lot of colleges, activists, and journalists are being played in this way.

Universities should invite neither professional provocateurs (i.e. trolls) like Coulter, nor people advocating theories like Mr. Spencer's, which are (to use a hip parlance) 'basic' and thoroughly debunked. If someone wants to deliver a well constructed, logically sound defense of racism, fine. The academic community can wrestle with it. But if they want to spew garbage with no sense of intellectual honesty... there are plent of internet and cable news outlets for that already.

A flawed argument that improperly uses data. These arguments have been thoroughly debunked in "Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth."

Haha. 'Issues.'

This is so much whining. Sometimes your ideas aren't popular and people don't want to hear or read them. Make your ideas better, more useful, more coherent with reality. Then people might eant to hear them.

What's truly gobstopping about this whining is that for centuries conservative ideas about race, gender, sexuality, and economics have been enforce as laws effectuating the suffering of millions upon millions of peoplle. Now that those ideas are losing popularity, conservatives are whining that they have a right to their ideas' popularity.

This is wrongheaded. Why is the University suddenly THE PUBLIC SQUARE? Why should every crackpot troll have the right to space and A/V amplification at a place dedicated to methodical inquiry and knowledge production? Universities should be ensuring that their students have the right to free speech. And they should probably support the notion that our society should provide many outlets for free speech, especially in the public square, through the internet, and for journalists. But their mission should not be, above all, to amplify anyone their students invite to campus. That's ridiculous. Let the College Republicans on campus make their own speeches.

Ooooh! Well it must be a serious problem meriting serious attention if "Even the Onion weighed in" to give their satirical hot take.

Even some conservatives say this author is full of shit. At least that's what I heard.

WTF? This is not what happened in the Berkeley case. It's as if the author wrote the article before the outcome.

And many who don't want trolls on campus are nowhere close to "demanding that offensive content be excised from public discourse...." We are merely noting that the University should not feel responsible to host and provide space and A/V amplification for every troll invited by its student groups.

Most of whom were black and lived with a single mother. The children in the control group were at home or in a lower-quality programs.

This experiment data seems skewd because if they're taking data from single black mother's in one group so shouldnt thy be they taking data from a white married women? This study was in north carolina but the discrimination of single black women to others is outragous. The system that people of color are put into the stereotype of a single black mother.

is now being championed by Ivanka Trump

This seemed strange that Ivanka would support such a democratic ideal Discussion Question:Do you think with Ivanka support Trump would pass a bill avocating for affordable care for children under 5?

President Trump's proposal, advanced by his daughter, would deduct the average cost of child care from parets income taxes and would include stay at home parents... Yet the aid he has propsed pales next to the actual cost of care.

This proposal seems in line with the Trump we have know during the campagin. That he gives what seems to be effort in the child care system of any system and they the benefits he gives are bare to none.

Discussion Question- How do you think other will see his bill proposal as? It seems to me that its just a mask to make him seem like a better president than he is, to hide away all of his bad qualities with a bill that wont cost him anything.

One reason: It helps women work, while other policies help them take breaks from work

"all women with children under age 18 was 70.5 percent, married mothers (67.9 percent) remained lower than the rate for mothers with other marital statuses (76.0 percent)" https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/famee.pdf

I find it strange that married women are less employed than women who have children but are under a different marital status. I wonder if they counted being a stay at home mom and of not what are those few percentages off?

slightly more years of schooling and an increased likelihood of living beyond 65- and thier children also got more education.

This more education peice could be that thye were abled to adapt in different environments as they got older and were able to work with others better because they were surrounded by other children as they grew up. Along with thier children being more educated it is reflected because thier parents more than likely have education and could get thier children into high- quality school and programs like child care.

Dicussion Question- Do you think thier is a stigma that if you're poor than you have childcare or if you're weathly you have childcare? What are some examples from media that you've seen?

Boys are more sensitive to disadvantage and responsive to intervention

This gives light on what we talked about in class with masculinity and how men have to hide their feelings to be a man. In these child care systems they are finding out that men seem to be more sensitve to others and are more than likely be abled to be themselves with others.

Children from birth until age 35- found that high-quality care buring the earliest years can influence whether both mothers and children born into disadvantage lead more successful lives.

My main question is what disadvantages? The low wages of the mothers? The possablility of being bullied for the children? the wording of this is off putting. Along with the high-quality care what does that constitute? A healthy enviornment where its clean? a safe environment where there is no bullying? a learning environment for the childs mind to grow? What if they werent in these conditions? Discussion Question- Have you or anyone else had an experance on a daycare that wasnt or was high-quality?

Aid for high-quality care has the biggest economic payoff for parents and thier children

As a child that grew up in a two working parent household it was crutical to my parents that i get taken care of and they make a sufficaint amount of income. In a two incomes no time most two household families have an income of $102,400, compared to $55,000 income if only the father was working (one thing i found off putting is that thier was no income with only the mother working) This amount of income is reflected by the long hours parents have to work. (http://www.ocregister.com/2015/11/07/two-incomes-no-time-the-struggle-is-real-for-many-working-parents-survey-finds/)

testing

position on "courtesy titles"

Overall grade = C/ C+

This is a passable attempt that unfortunately regurgitates political tropes from the late 1980s, moderately updated. In addition, more importantly, you have to provide more evidence in order to support your claims and steer clear of selective anecdotes. Stick with the actual sources.

you haven't proven this. you've asserted this numerous times but your evidence primarily consists of a few anecdotes drawn from elite white men (in the previous paragraph).

I notice you didn't link to this source. why? it's important to cite your sources so that readers can verify your claims.

have you been to a college campus? is not getting your $10,000+ honorarium the same as fearing for your life as a trans- student? is retreating to your $100,000+/ year job at a think tank or on cable tv the same as getting pulled over by police on a regular basis, or having your humanity questioned in print "weekly?" the former are the "fragile thugs" here, not the students.

weekly? avoid such hyperbole.

this is a false equivalency. the collapse of the European Union is not the same as student-led protests on college campuses.

is it fair to say that the "center" has collapsed because "centrist parties" have? do ideas only inhabit political parties?

why "premodern?" nepotism in this vein seems to be a particularly modern phenomenon. think about all the petty dictatorships in Africa, Latin America, Asia, etc. are those perhaps more instructive models?

the early 20th century had literal monarchies. the mid 20th century had literal fascists. is this period any different? you seem to be forcing the facts into a pre-existing narrative. stick with your sources and see what they say.

have you looked at many college curricula? most general education requirements, particularly at state universities, require some sort of "Western Civ" course. Most nowadays take it as an AP class in High School.

an odd word choice. should we have "faith" in a historical narrative? narratives, of course, aren't "truth." we have "faith" in things we can't otherwise prove.

that's not true. it applied mostly to white, protestant men. women's suffrage wasn't granted until the early 20th century in the US.

as they discuss (and as many others have subsequently) that progressive narrative was a construction of the 19th century - laden with the weight of colonialism, imperialism, and racist nationalism that accompanied that project. Notice, for instance, they're all white men you mention...

does popularity necessarily correlate with rigor? explain your reasoning here.

The U.S. Navy strike force that was supposedly racing to North Korea won't be there until sometime next week.

White House officials said on Tuesday they were relying on guidance from the Defense Department. Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from a premature announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea.

...

The Carl Vinson is now on a northerly course for the Korean Peninsula and is expected to arrive in the region sometime next week, Defense Department officials said. The White House declined to comment on the misunderstanding, referring all questions to the Pentagon. “Sean discussed it once when asked, and it was all about process,” said a spokesman, Michael Short.

Well, you know, it was kind of in the region...

And this decline is rarely talked about.

This is actually bad news, as it will have made Kim angrier and more likely to do something reckless...

I wonder how Putin's feeling about hacking the US election now?...

what evidence of predetermined results?

Now every student will have one.

Another page note.

These are page notes. Huh.

It's notable Dr. King was spurred by photos of Vietnamese children to end his silence.

In other words, the war drew funds away from Civil Rights programs.

This looks like the thesis to me.

Who is David Garrow?

Persuasion

I remember many of these...

Seems sad in a way...

much truth

At least it wasn't the Russians!

Test

xxxxx

so very true.

What else does CUNY have from this author?

I'm learning to use it!!

Reads like old campaign rhetoric.

some bs

INCARCERATION AND DETENTION SHOULD NOT BE A BUSINESS.

this is disgusting

Overall scientific credibility: 'very high', according to 4 scientists who analyzed this article.

Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis

This is rather overstated. While some weedy species may migrate poleward, studies have shown that corals cannot move to much higher latitude due to other factors such as the light corals require for photosynthesis and skeletal growth. Higher latitude corals will also be restricted to shallow water where they are more susceptible to cold stress.

Environmental Limits to Coral Reef Development: Where Do We Draw the Line? Joan A. Kleypas, John W. McManus and Lambert A. B. Meñez American Zoologist Vol. 39, No. 1 (Feb., 1999), pp. 146-159

John Bruno, Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill:

I think it is very unlikely any corals would be extinct in a decade. The problem isn't threat of extinction, its loss of habitat for other critters when corals bleach and die. The corals become less dense, but there will still be many millions of colonies for most species.

John Bruno, Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill:

First, they aren't moderate now. If they were to decrease and not exceed the bleaching threshold for another few decades, there would be some coral recovery. Second, 10-15 years is a big stretch. There would be some recovery, but not total recovery, especially of very long-lived slow-growing species.

John Bruno, Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill:

This is a very common misconception even among scientists. The warming, bleaching, and coral loss is 100% due to greenhouse gas emissions not the ENSO cycle and the fact this we were in a peak of the El Nino phase in early 2016. The GBR has experienced El Nino events for thousands of years, yet bleaching wasn't observed there until 1998 when ocean warming pushed ocean temperatures just above the bleaching threshold.

haha

Background information aside, this seems to be the crux of the article — there's a difference to be made between folks individually engaging in civil disobedience, no matter how subversive or disloyal it is to the official power structure, and a group spanning institutional affiliations coming together to create an extensive off-the-record governing body.

!!!! I'm sure Sessions won't do it though

I mean, where is the lie

whew

Crazy!

Love to read about mammoths!

What?

Exxon CEO as the voice of reason on climate in the Trump campaign.

I think the administration would have released the information before the election

I would not say that the stereotype is that pro-life people hate women, but that they fail to support women in whatever decision they make.

The language of this article is being exclusionary itself, ironically arguing against exclusion, by assuming that all women at the women march were American women. It also depends on what it means to be an American Woman is, who is considered in that.

As a class we are reading Threshold Concepts, which tells us about the different waves of feminism, and how the 2nd wave was heavily based around the decision to legalize abortion. Feminist issues in America are still largely based on health care rights, especially now again that they are in crisis under President Trump.

Class question: Can you be a feminist and be pro-life?

This sentence further perpetuates this false idea that men can only care about women in relation to them, wives and daughters, why not ever women as a whole or even women in a friend position.

Class question: Are statements like these, about men caring about women only in relation to themselves, more helpful or harmful?

Technically, everything will be "unimaginable" to the men she works with because they will never experience women's issues, so bringing them up should have no effect on the reader.

Every woman has a different meaning of freedom and opportunity for it, especially when thinking about social status, class, race, etc. so the "us" statement is unclear who the writer is talking about. For example, 69% of women who have abortions, are economically disadvantaged.

http://prospect.org/article/demographics-abortion-its-not-what-you-think

After reading the article, I was very confused at the end by the title. The articles main point is about the exclusion of pro-life women in the current feminist movement, such as the march, but what does that have to do with "American women"? Are they assuming maternal problems and abortion are only an American issue? That in itself is problematic.

What- the use of American supplies over foreign How- Once again an appeal to patriotism to talk about how good America is Why- To show that this is keeping American money and jobs and profits inside of America

What- America is really good How- Appeal to patriotism by using the word "America" over and over again Why- To talk about how great America is and how much better it is than some other countries

What- Talks about how even though the country isn't together currently, America is still against these hateful crimes. How- Uses an appeal to patriotism and relates to the audience by using "we" and "nation" Why- As an attempt to say that even though all of these people are against Trump and don't agree with how he's taking things on in the country, that regardless all of those people are still united under him

That would be incredible!

“Fear of War” should maybe be rephrased as “Threat of War”—unless you’re suggesting that the fear itself is the problem?

Immigration enforcement priorities were partly established by DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson's 2014 memorandum:

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/14_1120_memo_prosecutorial_discretion.pdf

Like this.

lorem ipsoum herejhskjhsgkjhdfkjghdjhgf

Reporters from The Times, BuzzFeed News, CNN, The Los Angeles Times and Politico were not allowed to enter the West Wing office of the press secretary, Sean M. Spicer, for the scheduled briefing. Aides to Mr. Spicer only allowed in reporters from a handpicked group of news organizations that, the White House said, had been previously confirmed.

what made the grade a D?

what made it unnecessary?

Where did they send them.

What does this mean?

Jeremy Scott F/W 2017 Collection gallery: https://www.forbes.com/pictures/gkhh45geem/jeremy-scott-runway/#4f8da69e58ca

Ready-to-wear F/W 2017 Collection showcase:

http://www.vogue.com/fashion-shows/fall-2017-ready-to-wear/public-school

Here is a closer look into Raf Simons' collection during NYFW. Visuals to pair with the descriptions of his collections: http://www.highsnobiety.com/2017/02/02/raf-simons-new-york-fw17/

This could be a direct commentary on strictly enforced categorizations for "men's" and "women's" clothing (refer back to Donald Trump's comment about how he likes his female staffers to dress "in women's clothing").

Discussion Question:

Fashion and trends are translated and diluted into society, but there may still be a discrepancy between the "fashion world" and the "real world." There is no doubt that fashion influences the "real world," and vice versa, but to what extent?

Embracing fluidity of interpretation and creation can be as radical as overtly political statements.

This "continuing dialogue" also seems to be further embraced on a bigger scale and globally due to influences like social media and bloggers.

"High Fashion" as a process is multi-faceted, but artists and designers are continually expressing notions of fluid sexuality and non-binary gender in their work. Such ideas are gradually collected from historically marginalized groups in society (these ideas are generally not what would be considered "mainstream,") yet they are translated for mass consumption by magazine editors, bloggers, influencers, etc. More and more, these types of notions are brought into mainstream society.

Discussion Question:

What are the major differences of and consequences for:

Interpretations of masculinity and femininity, defining masculinity and femininity vs. blurring the notions of gender and dissecting the system of a gender binary.

Image: One of the more overtly political statements at NYFW.

There is a relatively recent but rich history of women borrowing from "men's" wardrobes, (Yves Saint Laurent's "Le Smoking," Iris Apfel's surface of jeans for girls) that goes back further than one might realize.

"A Brief History of Women in Menswear"

This is a fun little article if you would like more information on the subject.

Susan Chira - Editor of News for the New York Times since 2011

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Chira

Most of Chira's pieces are opinion pieces concerning gender, feminism, and women's rights.

This is amazing news! So exciting!

Fascinating!

expansion of enforcement zone.

Interesting analogy.

I have so experienced this!

Como o Shinji: um teto inesperado.

This was a really crazy presser.

Overall scientific credibility: 'high', according to 3 scientists who analyzed this article.

Find more details in the annotations below and in Climate Feedback's analysis

Maternal Gut Microbes Control Offspring Sex and Survival Varian et al., 2014. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/maternal-gut-microbes-control-offspring-sex-and-survival-2329-8901.1000120.php?aid=30840

Probiotic Bacteria Induce a ‘Glow of Health’ Levkovich et al., 2013. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053867

Lactobacillus reuteri

What drew me to this article was those four words, "Immigrant Mother in Denver." My own mother is an immigrant and I am from Denver. One, I relate to the content and two, it intrigues me to know what has happened to her and if it could potentially happen to our family too.

wow. That is terrifying

Interesting idea.

Hilarious!

That must have been rough.

Adele is amazing!

Bla bla bla

A demo annotation

Good point!

I hadn't realized this. Interesting...

Interesting to think about this.

I guess that's one positive of clearing the land...

Never heard of these before!

The largest, wow!

Surprising!

This is good to know1

A rarity!

20 inches is pretty big!

There truly is a day for everything!

I'm intrigued about how many jobs this "rapid technological progress" replaced. I feel that that as technology progresses more job avenues and higher opportunities are created because although they eliminated mindless work someone still needs to maintain the machines and develop the code.

Wouldn't this also create more jobs to build, sell, and maintain those trillion-dollar trucks.

I find this very surprising. What would this be due to? Increased life expectancy?

This brings up a troubling idea for me that is not answered in the article. Could the growth of renewable energy harm the ocean? There been disasters with offshore oil rigs. What sort of problems could an offshore wind turbine face?

This is a convincing appeal because there are many big picture arguments for renewable energy but this statement deals with a more practical issue. Wind turbines are an eye sore but they can still be beneficial while being out of sight.

This sentence suggests the intended audience for this article: large businesses, financial institutions, and management companies that have the capital for producing their own energy and are interested in being self sustainable

The author seems to be credible in this subject matter. He has a history of writing articles on global environmental / resources issues. His work is also being published by a reputable news outlet.

This idea, along with the image above, is what drew me into this story. I have always pictured wind turbines in open plains, not the ocean.

This article really drew me in because I've always cared about environmental health and especially how it impacts animals. The author of this story appears to be credible and by using facts given by experts increases their credibility which in turn helps with ethos. One appeal the author uses quite a bit is Logos. With statistics, images, and accounts of similar smaller events such as this one occurring in the past it hits the nail on the head in terms of logos. I terms of audience this appears to appeal to a more academic audience as well as possibly more youthful individuals (since environmental health at least portrayed in media is something millennials really care about and are working towards improving).

This article is intended for people who are interested in sports, more specifically, international sports since it covers controversy about the track and field world Championships this summer. I chose this article because i am a huge fan of the Olympics and remember the recurring controversy over many of the the athletes from Russia. By using dates and examples from the past, the author can better support the idea that the doping has happened again and that the officials are trying to hide things.

A worthwhile effort.

Data refuge.

I could see this interpretation.

This would be an interesting development.

quoted in https://twitter.com/judell/status/828660012750827522

Very well said.

As another example of the trend in annotated news, there are many things to like about this example, and some notable drawbacks as well. Pros: More interactive than NYTimes' previous annotation efforts, nudges reader use of layered commentary, content of annotation layer encourages perspective-taking and reminds reader that political is personal (and vice versa). I also think it's interesting that interview processes and outcomes become the content of the annotation layer. Cons: Confusing how annotations (i.e. refugee contributions via interview) are related to specific anchor text, the "Notes" are static (no ability for reader response, no links out to related information), and annotation "Notes" don't have tags (limiting association with other documents and annotated content). That's my rough assessment of an important step forward.

The NYTimes' in-house annotation efforts are iterating rather quickly - this approach is more interactive than what was publishing a week ago, yet still isn't participatory or open. I'm eager to see how their efforts continue to grow, whether or not they'll jump to a third party platform, and if they'll discuss their process publicly.

To learn about these refugees - who they are, where they have come from, etc. - the reader must click on highlighted anchor text and read the annotation. The UX makes interaction with the annotation layer an essential quality of the reader's experience.

The numbering convention is similar to footnotes, and reminds me of commentary about similarities among annotation, hyperlinks, and footnotes.

Test annotating the new NYTimes dynamic "note."

I'm curious about the relationship between interviewing and annotating. Su "asked refugees... for their responses," with answers then anchored to specific parts of the EO. What's the process linking new content (refugee responses) to the anchor text?

In which we explain a common, real world sport, played by many around the world, with a fictional one—likely helpfully.