This highlights how community networks provide protection and emotional support during difficult times. In disaster recovery, these existing relationships can be just as important as outside assistance because they provide a sense of stability when everyday life is disrupted

I think this shows how cultural and religious practices can serve as important tools for recovery. Rather than simply responding to suffering, Vodou provides an ongoing system of support

I feel like this has been a controversy for awhile and people have been seeing gold as more upperclass and as a status symbol.

http://www.vintagecalculators.com/html/mechanical_calculators.html <br /> Mechanical calculators

https://www.jaapsch.net/mechcalc/index.htm<br /> Jaap's Mechanical Calculators Page

https://www.johnwolff.au/calculators/Tech/TechIndex.htm<br /> John Wolff's Web Museum<br /> Calculator Technical and Reference Section

https://www.crisvandevel.de/cst.htm

Since it's not common to have a global pandemic, Covid-19 made people more familiar with what epidemiology actually is.

Researchers can't just know the data methods but also must understand other things in that field like oncology or environment science.

How far have we gotten with this? Is the causation for most diseases the same?

epidemiology is not just statistics, but also has it's own theories and science. What makes it unique compared to other science topics?

mistake with the denominator, instead of using the specific number of people in each health group the entire population for every group was used instead. Counting the total group at risk is hard because the data comes from different sources, compared to counting heart attacks, which is easy.

Different test results because of the different factors all across the world.

people who don't study public health or know about epidemiology realized how difficult it is to fix and understand, and gave the general public an example as to what it actually entails.

researchers lost sight of the bigger picture which was the group of people they were studying.

Why is it such a big issue? Are there methods that stop it from becoming a bigger issue?

Are there not methods to determine this? New technology?

15%?

Why are we calling rows both m and i, and columns both n and j?

Servicing the Hermes 3000 Typewriter<br /> by [[Joe Van Cleave]] on YouTube

This Olympia SM9 typewriter has a carriage lock on it indicated by the #1 in the diagram in the manual at https://site.xavier.edu/polt/typewriters/OlympiaSM9.pdf Engaging the lock will cause two teeth to engage with a set of matching holes in the carriage on the left hand side of the machine that will lock the carriage in the center. (You should be able to physically see this happen by looking straight down from above on the left side of the front of the carriage as you engage the lock.) The Carriage Release lever (#15 in diagram) will allow the carriage to be moved left or right to properly center & lock the carriage into place.

Please ensure the typewriter is also properly seated into the hardware inside the case and locked so that it can't move and fill in any dead space in the case prior to shipment.

These two precautions will help ensure safe shipment of the delicate internal mechanisms under the carriage.

Thanks in advance for your assistance!

I think it's interesting that our brains rely on certain assumptions about how the world works to make sense of what we're seeing. These rules seem pretty effective most of the time, but I imagine they could also lead us to misinterpret things that don't follow the patterns we're used to. This could help explain why visual illusions happen, since our brains might be applying the same rules that normally help us perceive the world accurately, just in situations where those rules don't quite work.

I think this brings up an interesting issue with how researchers study cognition. If people aren't always aware of the processes their brains are using, then asking them to explain their thinking might not be the most reliable way to understand what's actually happening. I think Sternberg's study shows why it's important to use other kinds of evidence, like reaction times, rather than relying entirely on what participants say. Otherwise, researchers could end up drawing conclusions about cognition based on how people think their minds work instead of how they actually work.

It’s interesting how perfect the computer analogy is. When they say strike keys, it makes me think of how certain phrases, things, landmarks can bring back repressed memories.

what other tasks could we use as an example? Is there a way to strengthen our memory recall like how you update a computer?

How does the brain itself realize symbolic cognitive operations similar to a digital computer? Like in what sense can neural activity be understood as symbolic processing without literal physical symbols?

TEST ㅇㄹㅇ

CORRECTION: Lester Horton was NOT African American, and came to California in his 20's (1927) from Indiana, USA.

I thought this was interesting because I never really considered how connecting health insurance to employment shaped our healthcare system. It makes me wonder why we became so dependent on employers to provide something as important as healthcare coverage. I also think this creates challenges for people who work part-time, change jobs frequently, or cannot work because of their health. It raises the question of whether employment should have such a large influence on someone's ability to receive affordable healthcare.

This stood out to me because I think we often assume that having health insurance means someone has access to the care they need. However, even with insurance, patients may still struggle to afford appointments, medications, or treatments. I think it's important to recognize these financial barriers because they can affect a patient's ability to follow their treatment plan. It makes me wonder how many patients delay getting care simply because they cannot afford the out-of-pocket costs.

[

Bb_1x in the first partial fraction breakdown has a large 1 and a small x...formatting

I'm not seeing it in the generalized equation expansion of P(x)/Q(x). This is just repeated information from the previous section on non-repeated linear factors.

Partial fractions are composed to form a single rational expression.

Beginning this stanza of “What the Thunder Said”, Eliot describes a woman who manipulated her hair, and “fiddled whisper music on those strings”. Interpreting “those strings” as the woman’s own hair we can interpret a curious instance of a woman using her body as an instrument to play music. Of course, we must acknowledge that realistically, one can’t make any substantial sounds with their hair, and thus we can interpret her “whisper music” as imagined, or only perceived by her. In terms of the human body, especially in relation to hair, we can further understand this passage by looking at page 298 of the Visuddhi-Magga. This page discusses the superficiality of beauty and the ego, as it declares that the human body is repulsive. The repulsiveness of the human body is argued, as the Visuddhi Magga reads, “When any part of the body becomes detached, as, for instance, the hair of the head … people are unwilling so much as to touch it”. According to the Visuddhi Magga, humans assign significance and beauty to discardable parts of their body, and when those parts are discarded, humans view them with disgust. When comparing the teachings of the Visuddhi-Magga with the long-haired woman, there seems to be a contrast in appreciation for the human body. While the Visuddhi-Magga argues that the body, especially the hair, is repulsive, the woman is using her own hair as an instrument, something of significance and beauty in and of itself. I believe another important aspect of this analysis lies in the consideration of Eliot’s notion of “conceptual death”. In “The Waste Land” Eliot has challenged the reader’s literal understanding of death, and instead seems to propose the idea that death is a complex and cultural state that cannot be so easily defined. Literally, our hair is dead, but when attached to our body, it becomes a part of a living thing, and thus seems to gain significance through what I argue is “conceptual vitality”. Interpeting the lesson of the Visuddhi-Magga, hair loses its “vitality” when it is cut off, and becomes recognizably repulsive. Though it was always dead, it has lost its significance to the body. I would argue that the woman using her hair as an instrument is an affirmation of the hair’s significance to herself, and thus, a part of her own conceptual vitality.

right so not just locally (their environment) but students would be able to apply themselves as well.

Adding a comment here

takovéhle formulace nevím, jestli vhodné na webu ministerstva...

tady to působí zaujatě...lze to nějak zobecnit? ze sektorových analýz?

should I be defining a feasible region here?

I don't know where I may have learned this.

shouldn't this have been presented in the inequality system.

Both of these were ellipses in parabolas without considering that any of the four solutions could be invalid yielding one or no solutions.

interesting to note that this system has one solution and the line is therefore tangent to the circle.

It didn't say to graph, but I believe there should always be a picture with the story.

again, a statement about how the solutions for a single outcome and no solution will present themselves if we're not going to examine examples and do exercises on them.

You need a statement in here about how the single solution and non solution will present themselves upon examination.

ale to by mohla nastat i u 2 podobných bytů v osobním vlastnictví, že mohou mít velmi rozdílné měsíční zatížení...a stejně tak u nájemních...

Nevím, jestli tuto poznámku nedat do metodiky: Sčítání lidu v roce 2021 poprvé v historii čerpalo velkou část dat z registrů a po lidech nechtělo vyplňovat podrobnosti o bytech. Jenže státní registry neobsahují informaci o tom, zda je byt družstevní, nebo v osobním vlastnictví. • Lidé sice mohli tuto kolonku vyplnit dobrovolně, ale miliony z nich ji nechaly prázdnou. • Statistici pak tyto chybějící miliony bytů do finálního podílu nezahrnuli ideálním způsobem, což výsledné číslo 3,1 % uměle podhodnotilo. Skutečný podíl družstevních bytů v roce 2021 byl s vysokou pravděpodobností vyšší.

v tomto odstavci 3 věty, první o družstvech, druhá celkově a třetí o družstvech, trochu mne ten prostředek zmátl, dala bych nejdřív věty o družstvech a pak až z pohledu rozdělení všech forem vlastnictví bytových domů podle nosné konstrukce.

1991-2021 tedy nájemní bydlení se snižovalo?

v minulosti se na to používalo stavební spoření...

tady jsou družstevními byty myšleny pouze obydlené družstevní byty? pokud i neobydlené, nevává smysl to poměřovat oproti obydleným bytům...

https://climateandhealthalliance.org/cop29-un-climate-change-conference/

This conference was held in Baku, Azerbaijan, in November of 2024, four years after this novel was published.

https://unfccc.int/topics/global-stocktake

Robinson's take is different than the impression you get when you look at the website and read the actual report.

https://www.lewik.org/term/11984/the-conference-of-the-parties-article-14-paris-agreement-climatic-change/

Throughout the novel, Robinson is reflecting on current climate and environmental policy, which shows the depth of his knowledge as well as his awareness of current policy shortcomings.

Chapter 3 of The Ministry for the Future is a shorter chapter written in a third-person, report-like style. It documents the attempt to account for national CO2 emissions and how frustrating it is, which leads to the creation of "a new Subsidiary Body for Implementation of the Agreement," which the press dubs The Ministry for the Future. This chapter is a bit jarring given that the previous two chapters, one about "big heat wave" in India written in first-person from the perspective of Frank May, and one written in a poetic, riddle-like style in the voice of the sun. [More to come.]

I think this bot is useful because it helps deep-cleaning my social media account. When I see someone posting information that I don't feel comfortable with, I can just block this poster. This also come in handy for parents to manage accounts of their children.

This bot helps deep clean social media, notifications, settings. When you find someone's constantly posting inappropriate content, you can add them to your block list.

I find antagonist bots so annoying, as I've encountered so many of these at a a mass scale usually pushing some sort of a propaganda that is harmful to society. Is there a solution to this? Do we learn how to kill these bots?

The fact that platforms can 'provide certain capabilities' and 'limit' rather than banning them altogether really surprises me. To a certain degree, do platforms enjoy having bots take over? People care enough to create bots for your platform, also, sometimes what they can post can generate more engagement.

This source provided more information about what citizens think of Omans sultan and more information on why they are protesting. I think it's interesting how the article initially praises the sultan explaining the prosperity of Oman and him being a "man of culture". Saying this all before explaining the reason for protesting or even the rule of protesting emphasizes the ethical issue in what limiting protest does.

The Dead internet theory can be considered a conspiracy theory, but today its seems more and more real. It's basically a concept where we believe the internet is run by these bots that shape the algorithm in order to manipulate us as a whole. I don't think this theory is entirely true but I can see it happening in the near future with AI.

this source describes the dead internet theory as the theory that there are not really anymore people on the internet and that everything is 'controlled' or automated by bots. this is both intriguing and upsetting because when you think about it, the harmful comments left on peoples' posts can be detrimental and wether or not they're coming from a real person they hurt a real person behind a screen. the idea of this is worse if the comment was left by a bot.

Astroturfing is basically making a movement pushed by big corps and made to seem as raw spontaneos media.

This "Dead internet theory" is so interesting. I have actually not thought about it before, but I do realize that some of the people I interact with online are pretty weird (don't look like real people). I feel like not all of the theory is true, but it does make me think of how much we can trust on social media.

This website is a site where you can buy followers on a variety of social media accounts. This is interesting because it can essentially buy you fame, but also in a sense credibility because nowadays many people look at follower count when determining whether to trust the user or not. The site states that they "sell social media signals from real people". The intention behind this is so that it is harder for the creators audience to determine whether one has bought their followers or not.

Dead internet theory is basically the idea that most of the internet isn't real people anymore, just bots and AI posting content and interacting with each other. It started out as a conspiracy theory on online forums around 2021, with people claiming the internet "died" sometime around 2016 and has been mostly fake since. At first most people brushed it off, but it's gotten taken more seriously now that AI makes it so easy to churn out posts, images, and comments. The Wikipedia page mentions stuff like AI-generated images going viral on Facebook as an example of how much bot content is out there now. So even if the internet isn't totally "dead," the theory is getting harder to fully dismiss.

This is a subreddit discussing bots. One post fascinated me. A recent forecast told us that 'bot users' may be more than 1000 times higher than human ones. Reddit was a platform where I sometimes felt a human connection through finding subreddits, users, and conversations that I was able to relate to, whether emotionally, physically, or in terms of interests, and now it's a platform mostly full of machines. Also, on a subreddit about bots, most of these users and their post may ironically just be bots!

According to this source, the dead internet theory holds that most of social media, or a large portion of it, is run by bots. Social media organizations may either use these bots to make their sites more addictive to expose people to more ads and make more money, or they may use these bots to heavily influence people's views by what they are consuming on their feeds or what they see "most people" are agreeing with. A third alternative is that these bots are made by third parties who may be trying to push their own agendas/ scams. Whatever the motive is behind making these bots, dead internet theory says that most of the interactions you have or media you see is heavily influenced by bots.

In the IndieWire article about Star Wars: The Last Jedi, researcher Morten Bay found that 50.9% of the people posting negative tweets about the movie were politically motivated or not even human. What surprised me most is that so much of the "fan hate" was actually politically motivated, not real fans reacting to the movie.

The idea of a digitally incesteous ouroboros is so disturbing and in equal measures fascinating! the source touches on the advent and contemporary analysis of bots feeding content into one another as they're both producing and reacting to content divorced from any human involvement. Especially with the evolution and abundance of AI now adays to the layman, the barrier for entry to add to this rotting hell is on the floor, so it's only going to get worse!

This section makes me think about how important it is to be able to identify content on social media. If an article's written by the bot, we should pay attention on the realness of this piece of information because it could lead to misunderstanding.

I wonder in what spaces of the internet bots are used most heavily and if I encounter such spaces.

This is so interesting and I literally just realize this. It is sometimes really hard to distinguish between bots and real person on social media right now. With AI developing this fast, I was wondering if it would be hard to distinguish between AI and real person as well.

This sentence shows the main changes and starts explaining how the family's become different.

I like this part because it help the reader imagine how happy the family was.

This Paragraph explain what the family was like before the devorce.

This Sentence tells the reader the main change in the family

HTML에 이미 존재하는 요소를 JavaScript에서 가져오는 거야.

Hello

World

코드 기능 결과 document.getElementById("container") id로 찾기 요소 하나 또는 null

document.getElementsByClassName("text") class로 찾기 HTMLCollection

document.querySelector(".text") CSS 선택자로 찾기 첫 번째 일치 요소

document.querySelectorAll(".text") CSS 선택자로 전부 찾기 NodeList

obj.method() → this = obj

element.addEventListener("click", obj.method) → 일반 함수라면 클릭 시 this = element

element.addEventListener("click", () => obj.method()) → method 내부에서 this = obj

Wrapper = 실제 DOM 요소를 감싸서 jQuery의 편리한 기능을 사용할 수 있게 해주는 객체.

• $("#id") → jQuery wrapper 반환 → .on(), .html()

기능 Native DOM (a) jQuery (b)

내용 변경 a.innerHTML = "Hi" b.html("Hi")

이벤트 등록 a.addEventListener("click", foo) b.on("click", foo)

CSS 변경 a.style.color = "red" b.css("color", "red")

요소 삭제 a.remove() b.remove()

방법 A. addEventListener() button.addEventListener("click", callback);

방법 B. onclick 속성 button.onclick = callback;

방법 C. HTML에 이벤트 지정 <button onclick="callback()">Click</button>

4-2. 이벤트 종류 (Slide 13) 이벤트 언제 발생? click 클릭 load 로딩 완료 unload 문서에서 벗어나는 과정 change 값 변경이 확정될 때 mouseover 마우스가 요소 안으로 들어올 때 mouseout 마우스가 요소 밖으로 나갈 때 mousedown 마우스 버튼 누름 mouseup 마우스 버튼 뗌

$.getJSON()은 jQuery에서 JSON 데이터를 비동기적으로 가져오는 메서드야.

jsonFilePath는 파일 경로.

function(json) { ... }는 데이터를 성공적으로 가져왔을 때 실행할 Callback이야.

json에는 가져온 JSON 데이터가 들어와.

foo("./data.json");

document.createElement("div") 새로운 div 생성 X document.createTextNode("Hi") 텍스트 노드 생성 X parent.appendChild(child) 부모에게 자식 추가 O parent.removeChild(child) 부모에게서 자식 삭제 O child.remove() 자기 자신 삭제 X child.parentNode 부모 노드 참조 X

코드 종류 하는 일 element.innerHTML = "Hi" 속성 HTML 내용 수정 element.textContent = "Hi" 속성 텍스트 내용 수정 element.setAttribute("id", "box") 메서드 HTML 속성 지정 element.style.color = "red" 속성 글자 색상 수정 element.classList.add("active") 메서드 class 추가

element.addEventListener("이벤트 종류", 실행할 함수);

부분 의미 element 이벤트를 감지할 HTML 요소 addEventListener 이벤트 리스너 등록 "click" 어떤 이벤트를 기다릴지 실행할 함수 이벤트 발생 시 실행할 Callback

++++ control.addEventListener("click", controller.processGoHome());-> totally different = exectues as soon as it is regeistered not clicked

// ① 삭제할 자식 가져오기 let myParagraph = document.getElementById("my_paragraph");

// ② 부모 노드 가져오기 let parent = myParagraph.parentNode;

// ③ 부모가 자식 삭제하기 parent.removeChild(myParagraph);

```html

Hello!

```

• div#container = Parent Node
• p#my_paragraph = Child Node

Cabeza de Vaca. What can one man or even many possibly accomplish in the face of humanity's overwhelming wickedness and greed. They really thought that they could stop an evil that could run itself for 1000 years, no need to tend it.

It's very interesting but also somewhat obvious how domination by a foreign power leads the victims to consider the knowledge that the foreigner must possess. Its hard to word this properly. But we see that the recipient or the defeated can deal with this in many different ways. The Chinese and Japanese both had periods of learning and incorporating Western knowledge in order to become stronger. What is very interesting is how these cultures wrestle with their desire to preserve their national/cultural identity and perception of self-importance while also recognizing that they have been outclassed. For example China wished desperately to retain its existing political order and sources of knowledge whereas Japan was more transformative.

This is gender identity but manifested the opposite direction, where a man applies a social role/stereotype to his gender, then thinks he is more of a man for being more aggressive.

He may also think he is more of a woman for being more stereotypically “feminine”.

Gender identity is internalized sexism.

She may also be told that she is a man or internalize sexism by thinking that she is a man because she has these qualities.

Gender identity is internalized sexism.

📊 Current Student Debt Statistics (2025-2026)

Average Debt at Graduation:

• 2025 Graduates: The average student loan debt at graduation is approximately $39,550 .‌

• 2024 Graduates: The average was $38,370 .‌

• Comparison to 2017: The textbook cites an average of 40,000—an increase of about 38% in nominal dollars .‌

What sickness caused her death?

Oh, what a soul aching tragedy.

Good work Metellus, go check in on him. He loves me a lot, and I have given him reasons too. Send him here, and I will shape him to our purpose.

Caius Ligarius dislikes Caesar, Who checked him for speaking well of Pompey. I doubt any of you have thought of him.

That is the latest, and don't fail.

By eight o'clock, is that the latest?

No, all of us will be there to convince him.

But when I tell him that he hates people who flatter him, he agrees, I will flatter him. Let me work, I can convince him, And I will bring him to the Capitol.

Imagery, supernatural disruption "And the ghosts did shriek and squeal on the streets. O Caesar, these things are beyond natural. And I do fear them."

"beyond all use" is showing how these omens are unusual and outside the normal humanity.

"Use" meaning something unusual

She is dead.

Ha? Portia?

No person expresses their sadness better. Portia is dead.

Your wisdom is useless if you let sinful tragedies happen.

Missing figure!

Examination

Examining how these inconsistent systems present themselves is necessary. It helps with recognition.

I like the geographic representation.

I would like to see more sections structured this way.

Bold print for "Gaussian elimination"

bold print?

bold print?

Organization should be taught in every problem we examine.

Honestly the donkey thing made me laugh, because it's kind of genius. The police can't really do anything without looking ridiculous, so the protesters basically win either way. What stuck with me is that the donkey has no clue what it's doing, but the message still gets out and nobody gets caught. It made me think about how bots work the same way, where the people behind them can hide while the bot takes the heat. I'm just not sure that should let the person off the hook, since someone still had to paint the sign.

First it's that idea of the donkey protester mentioned a moment ago. There's a detachment between awareness and execution of actions when in the case of bots, given their standing as more of a tool then an entity. It would be critiquing a hammer for pounding a nail wrong, when the one using the tool could not be identified. There's also the degree of ability in sheer quantity of action, since a bot could take over an entire thread in seconds while it would require substantial manual effort to do so for a human.

I think social media platforms allow bots to operate for a couple of reasons. First, bots are useful for informing people of information that can be automated, like the news, weather, warnings, etc. Bots are also useful to social media companies so that they can inflate their numbers; bots can make it look like more people are active at any one point and make a social media platform look more successful. The last reason social media companies might allow bots is that enforcing the bots would cost them a lot of money, so allowing them and only moderating the extreme usage of bots would save the companies loads of money.

If I found out an account was a bot, I wouldn't trust what it says. I don't know who is controlling it behind the scenes, and it feels like it's being used to manipulate public opinion.

I found this example interesting because it shows me that we should carefully think before making any loop or something automated. I think depending on users, some might just ignore the message, or simply block the account. This makes me to think that when we program something, we should consider potential consequences of automation or repeated action before creating a bot, not just simply telling the bot when to stop!

I dislike call bots. I specifically dislike it when I'm calling for help and it first goes through a bot. An example of this is some leasing offices. When contacting customer support, nowadays, it is very common that a bot picks up. They ask you what you're calling for and then many times, they can't understand you initially which leads to you having to repeat yourself over and over again. This makes me frustrated and even so, depending on your question, sometimes they will just tell you to look for the answers on their online website and it is very hard to reach an actual human worker even if by your judgement, the question needs to be answered by a live person.

Responding to bots I like and dislike: Some of the bots I really enjoy are on Twitch. NightBot and Fossabot are bots that allow custom chat responses and actions to take place. For example, they can automatically time users out or respond to frequently asked questions such as a rule set or the streamer's time zone. Some bots I dislike are the view bots on Twitch. Inflating view counts is just a bad practice that I think degrades the site and the communities that people try to build. Sadly, in the current Twitch meta, buying viewbots is almost essential for growth.

Historians try to be as unbiased as possible, but with the departure from the norm could we expect biased views about history in general?

I have noticed that when Trump talks about bipartisan topics that he seems to have the goal to separate the topic into a partisan topic.

• Core Theme & Premise:

  • The human voice functions as an essential pillar of personal identity, emotion, and social connection rather than just a mechanism for communication.
  • Season 2 of The Deep End podcast explores the neurological power of the voice, the impact of losing it, and how AI-driven voice cloning bridges the gap.

• Jules Rodriguez's Journey:

  • Jules—a former science teacher, stand-up comedian, podcaster, father, and husband—lost his mobility and speech due to ALS (diagnosed in 2020).
  • He now relies on eye-tracking technology to type and uses an AI-generated synthetic voice clone to speak.
  • For Jules, the progressive loss of his voice felt like "fading away," a gradual decay documented across episodes of his podcast with his wife, MA.

• Neurology & Development of Vocal Perception:

  • Cognitive scientist Greg Bryant explains that the brain features a dedicated voice-selective region that activates early in development.
  • Voices serve as rich sensory signals, conveying history, emotion, physical state, and personality.
  • Fetuses recognize maternal vocal rhythms and language patterns in utero, making voice one of the earliest social inputs.

• Clinical Perspectives & Voice Banking:

  • Speech-language pathologist Kate Nilson assists ALS patients with voice banking and AI cloning—empowering them with a proactive step to preserve their identity and leave lasting recordings for families.
  • Jessica Piotrowski (UC Davis) notes that for many patients, losing the ability to speak is often more emotionally devastating than losing mobility, as vocal expression is vital for autonomy, humor, dignity, and basic care needs.

• The Psychological Toll of Silence:

  • Patrick Darling, an ALS patient from Bristol, describes vocal loss as isolating, frustrating, and frightening, noting that others often forget the person inside when met with silence.
  • A simulation assignment where speech pathology students and host Laura Sanders spent hours communicating only via text-to-speech apps highlighted intense self-censorship, awkwardness, and withdrawal from casual social connection.

Questa è una traduzione (bozza) diversa dal libro cartaceo pubblicato da Ayros, che varia per alcune scelte linguistiche e terminologiche.

Learning about the dark parts of history allows us to not repeat the pattern of those parts. By recognizing there were dark times, we realize that we have progressed as a society.

The idea that a museum director i being targeted for expressing that history is a teaching tool and a form of not letting mistakes repeat themselves is very frightening. This could be construed as a violation of free speech.

I found it interesting that being single has been seen as an early part of one's life in the past; however, more people than ever before are now living alone. I believe that this reflects a change in society's view of how a "family" or "successful adulthood" is defined over time. This makes me wonder whether people choose to remain single more frequently due to a desire for personal freedom and/or because their focus is primarily upon education, career development and/or other objectives prior to beginning a family.

I was interested by this article because most of the time I consider my own health to be based upon my own choices; however, the article illustrated that social class also affects a person's health.

For example, individuals who are wealthier will likely have an advantage over those who are poorer regarding access to nutritious food, safe housing and quality health care. The article caused me to reflect on how hard it must be for individuals with limited income to maintain good health when they do not have the same advantages or access to resources as individuals with more income.

I thought this was interesting because I always thought standardized tests were mainly used to measure how much a student knows. I did not really think about how a student’s background, race, or family income could affect their results. It made me realize that two students can work equally hard but have different opportunities to prepare for these tests. This also connects to social class because having more resources can give some students an advantage.

I thought this was interesting because I feel like family used to be seen as something everyone was expected to prioritize, but now people have so many other goals like school, careers, and becoming financially stable. I also thought it was interesting that people’s views were connected to their religious and political beliefs. It makes me wonder if people’s ideas about what a “successful life” looks like have changed over time because of how much society has changed. I can understand why someone might want to focus on their career or education before getting married or having kids.

unificar dos secciones cambiar nombre -> caracterización general

test

We spend a lot of time in class talking about segregation and recently about redlining. I do wonder, however, if America's culture as a whole differs enough from other countries to slow down mobility on top of the systematic issues that plague the country.

School was always meant to be the great equalizer. One of the main purposes of education that we discussed in class is that education can be used to give people social mobility. This is an example of data that shows education doing its job correctly.

Demographics and geography can make the difference in the resources available to children. If an under resourced child can suddenly acquire all of the resources available to those of the upper class, then there really is nothing that separates the two classes at all.

Social capital can be so incredibly useful for almost all kinds of social mobility. A person's life can get so much easier and they can rise so much faster than others just by knowing the correct people. That is why most consider networking to be an incredibly important skill and why there are a lot of events in college focusing on that one aspect of professional life.

I found it interesting that economic mobility can vary so dramatically from one neighborhood to another within the same city. We often talk about inequality as if it is primarily an individual or family issue, but this whole article goes to show that inequality can also be geographic. As we've been reading all week, where someone lives determines what resources and opportunities are available to them. This makes me continue to think about how policies focused only on helping individuals aren't enough. If the underlying conditions of a community remain unchanged, people may continue to face the same barriers even when they receive individual assistance.

This quote stood out to me because it contradicts the assumption of people's success being the result of individual efforts alone. The article shows that children who grow up in various parts of the country can have unequal probabilities of getting into the upper part of the income distribution. The probability of upward mobility is substantially higher for such cities as Boston and Seattle in comparison with Atlanta and Charlotte. It makes one think about the impact that school system, job prospects, transportation, and other neighborhood characteristics can have on a person's life even before he or she is able to make conscious decisions.

This should probably be after the circus ticket and meal ticket problems.

If we're just going to examine the profit of the profit-loss function, shouldn't this be an inequality? Is P(x) a parameterization?

profit-loss function

Things to cover here, C(x) and R(x) are represented by the y-axis, that's why they are annotated as y_1 and y_2. x represents the number of units (the x-axis). For the R(x)=px, there's no information on where this number would come from. If we're going to call P(x) the profit function, shouldn't we use an inequality?

Just to complete the graph and put forth the educational information, the area to the left of the break-even point is called loss.

ambiguity of womens vote helps them

Strategic to the end

Not about temperance resistance

driven by same thing, mobilization + comp

Variation in womens suffrage not explained by variation in progressive movement

Created competition in the south

North was liberal besides right to vote

More competition allows for reform to take place

Needed high mobilization and there actually was some effect even in non competitive places

Same pattern, but interesting that the strat seems to wrok here of garnering votes

Got more competative then passed bill

So no wonder shit got passed in the west

Boston and NY baby

democratic bastion

Unique

Como conseguimos saber se se o número de condição é elevado? Existe um limite para o número ou depende do problema?

Isso quer dizer que um erro compensa o outro?

While this is an interesting idea, there are some important details missing from the description of the 'data' that are used. Specifically, the RAM legacy stock assessment database consists almost entirely of stock assessment model output, not raw/real data. The SSB time series in particular are heavily filtered, smoothed, and interpolated, frequently exhibit monotonic or U-shaped trends, and have a very high degree of linear autocorrelation. Some are constant for long periods because they relax to steady state in the absence of real data to inform the model. Additionally, the recruitment estimates in many cases come directly from the internally fitted stock-recruit model, not from empirical estimates. It is highly likely that the analysis is not really recovering the biological dynamics, but rather the dynamics of the filtering models.

The difficult-to-believe finding that there is only one attractor for all the world's fish is better explained by the fact that what is being called data is actually model output, the vast majority of which come from a single modeling framework (with linear structure except in recruitment). This modeling framework is overwhelmingly likely to produce stable dynamics; more complex dynamics can only be obtained through external forcing which the filtered data have (by definition) had filtered out. (Note that the fact that EDM 'works' does not automatically imply that the dynamics are complex and nonlinear because EDM also 'works' in simple, linear systems; additional tests are required to assert this.)

The similarity of 'dynamics' by taxon/trophic level and geographic region can be explained by the fact that stock assessment scientists tend to model similar species using similar models, and that there are regional differences in assessment culture (managers from a given region tend to use similar models). For example, nearly all US west coast rockfish stock assessments are age-structured models with Beverton-Holt recruitment dynamics and a constant mortality rate. Given the confounding between biological information and modeling choices, it would make for a more convincing, interesting, and worthwhile study if direct observations of fish populations (such as the fishery independent survey data from around the globe, readily available in the FishGlob Database) were used instead of model output.

Thank you for considering my comment, Dr. Tanya Rogers

It helps by checking user behaviour, connections, locations and unusual transactions.

It can analyse a huge amount of data much faster than humans.

But does AI completely replace humans?

No.

Humans can still review suspicious transactions and make the final decision.

Overall, AI helps make digital financial services safer, faster and more secure.

This is where transparent reporting helps.

Instead of simply saying that a transaction is risky, AI can show the reasons.

For example:

The device is new. The location is unusual. The transaction amount is very high. Many transactions happened in a short time.

AI learns our normal spending pattern and looks for anything that is different.

For example, if someone normally spends ₹500 to ₹2,000 but suddenly makes a payment of ₹80,000 from a new device, AI can flag it.

AI can look at where a customer normally makes their transactions.

For example, if a person usually makes payments in Bengaluru but suddenly there is a large transaction from a completely different location, AI may flag it.

AI looks at the connections between users, devices, businesses and transactions.

For example, if many suspicious accounts are connected to the same device or IP address, AI can identify that connection.

AI learns how a person normally uses their banking app. It can check things like typing speed, swiping patterns and login behaviour.

So, if someone else gets access to the account and their behaviour is very different, AI can detect it and flag the activity.

We all use online banking and digital payments today. But with more digital payments, there is also a higher risk of fraud.

The "white house" is not qualified to make a review of the accuracy of these exhibits. However, accuracy does not seem to be of paramount importance to their agenda.

it's very facinating and sad that our whole youth is just us learning and training to be adults and to function in society. Humans don't just exist, we are always learning to prepare for the next "segement" of our lives until we die. I feel like don't learn to be a kid, we just experience childhood whille we learn to be adults if that makes sense.

This is why I think education beyond high school is almost important. from K-12, most of us remain with the same people in the same community, however, when we go off the college we are introduced to new people in a new environment. We learn so much more than just educational material, we also learn more about other cultures through this socialization.

Socialization just makes us cooperate in society. If every person did not have socialization until they were older, I think society would be complete chaos. We are taught from a young age how to act, and this is for the function of society, and in hopes that we reap the benefits of a smooth functioning society.

It's really faciniating how similarly brains work in monkeys and humans. We are able to perfrom experiments on monkeys to see how a similar experience or development would humans. I feel like it may unethical to isolate young monkeys from their mothers, but the information we have found is very interesting.

I agree with this. I think a lot of our personailty and opinions are infleunced by the people around us and what we are exposed to throughout our lives. I know there are core things about my personality that are the same as from when I was a child, but as I started to be on the internet more and spend more time with my friends, my personality changed. I will expect it to change more as I meet new people and as I get older and have more experiences.

influence of hermeneutics

If the brain's doors for acetate are supposedly blocked or damaged right after quitting alcohol, how would feeding someone a keto diet or ketone drinks actually help them feel better during withdrawal?

Could the brain be intentionally shutting down its transporters just to protect its genes from getting messed up by too much acetate from constant binge drinking?

This passage stands out because it shows that being a skilled surgeon also means knowing when to stop. Dr. Ducker is not just thinking technically, but ethically: if he cannot help Mrs. Kelly, he should not cause more harm. The line also reveals his exhaustion and frustration, which makes him feel more human.

I noticed how the heartbeat sounds almost act like a warning system throughout the story. When the rhythm starts changing, the reader can immediately sense something is wrong without Franklin having to explain it.

This detail seems almost unnecessary at first, but I think it helps establish a contrast between the surgeon's ordinary life and the extremely serious situation he is about to enter.

Hearing Mrs. Kelly describe her pain in her own words makes the stakes feel much more personal. It also helps explain why she is willing to go through such a dangerous surgery.

This is such a small detail, but it immediately shows how precise the surgeon has to be. It also makes him seem more human before we even get to the operation.

This shows that education was connected to the development of the new nation. The author believed that America needed its own education system instead of depending on other countries.

This shows that people believed education could shape children’s behavior and character. They thought teaching children good values would help improve society in the future

This shows that teachers were expected to be good role models. Students were more likely to respect and learn from teachers who were kind, respectful, and responsible.

This shows that schools do more than teach academic subjects. They also teach students important social values, such as democracy, equality, and fairness.

This shows that education was an important part of the Civil Rights Movement. African Americans used education to fight against racism and discrimination and to achieve equal rights.

This part is interesting because schools could affect a person’s future opportunities. Education could help students succeed, but it could also create or reinforce inequality by placing people into different social positions.

This shows how education practices became more similar across different schools. Teachers brought new professional knowledge and ideas with them, which helped improve and standardize education

This shows how much the American education system has changed over time. Early schools were informal and had limited resources, while modern schools became more organized and standardized.

put the right icons here

The list of objectionable examples certainly seems to be cherry-picked based on their contributing to a certain narrative, rather than from their relative importance.