7,842 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2019
    1. Our primary priority should neither be minimizing cost nor maximizing pedagogical flexibility. Our primary priority should be increasing student learning, and our efforts to reduce costs and increase pedagogical flexibility must always be subservient to that end. When we fail to put student learning first, we can become zealots who confuse the means with the ends.

      This is tortured. The only difference I can see between priority 1 and preferred priority 2 seems to be an opportunity to sneak something in that adds cost (profit) under the claim that it's better for student learning. As if the top priority of OER or ZTC "fanatic" educators isn't student success.

      I think it's easier to find common ground than the author suggests. And I suspect much of the ZTC and OER fanaticism may be coming from outside the ranks of educators, via political focus that ignores nuance.

  2. Sep 2019
    1. Express.co.uk

      Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

      Hit #1 (score of 51.9)

      Hit #2 (score of 50.7)

      Hit #3 (score of 48.1)

      Hit #4 (score of 47.6)

      Hit #5 (score of 47.5)

      I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

    2. Express.co.uk

      Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

      Hit #1 (score of 45.3)

      Hit #2 (score of 45.1)

      Hit #3 (score of 42.0)

      Hit #4 (score of 41.6)

      Hit #5 (score of 41.0)

      I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

    3. Express.co.uk

      Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

      Hit #1 (score of 51.9)

      Hit #2 (score of 50.7)

      Hit #3 (score of 48.1)

      Hit #4 (score of 47.6)

      Hit #5 (score of 47.5)

      I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

    4. Express.co.uk

      Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

      Hit #1 (score of 45.3)

      Hit #2 (score of 45.1)

      Hit #3 (score of 42.0)

      Hit #4 (score of 41.6)

      Hit #5 (score of 41.0)

      I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

    1. Note: The peer reviews in Peerage of Science are judged and scored for accuracy and fairness by other reviewers. The Weight -value indicates that, relative to the best review (Weight=1.00)


      Review by Peer 1755 (Weight = 1.00)

      Introduction: This paper presents a Bayesian model of mating in a fish, that combines behavioural data on encounters and matings with genetic parentage data. It contrasts this model with classical analyses that use only particular facets of these data.

      Merits: In my opinion, this paper's most important merits are:

      That the model makes conceptual sense, and is presented in a way that is fairly easy to follow.

      That the authors share the model code and data. This will make the model a lot more useful for other researchers.

      That the paper is well written.

      Critique: Despite this, I think there are things that could be clarified or improved:

      1. There seems to be a considerable skew in the reproduction data. This is expected, but this comes with a risk violating the assumptions of common statistical models. Does the models used adequately capture this? In particular, the correlation coefficients (Figure 1) must be largely driven by single influential data points.

      2. Given the above skew and structure of the data and that the model results extrapolates quite a bit from what was observed, it would be nice to see more through checks and discussion about the validitiy of the model. How well the model can reproduce features of the data? The posterior predictions in Figure 4 seem to indicate that the model fits data rather poorly? But I may be mistaken, and the manuscript does not interpret these results much.

      3. I got the JAGS model to run with only minor editing (that is, moving the data generating code to its own file). However, I can't, using the data in the script, recover the scatterplots and Pearson correlations displayed in Figure 1. I assume my analysis (see attached Sweave pdf output) is wrong somehow, suggesting a need for better documentation so that readers such as myself can understand the data. It may help to clarify what variables are what, which samples have been omitted (from what analyses and for what reasons), and store the data in tabular format in addition to the JAGS input format. It would also be a nice addition to have the code used for running the model and summarising the results -- it would save a user quite a bit of effort without much work on behalf of the authors.

      4. The sample sizes for data on releasing of gametes are particularly small. One wonders how much information they contribute? Similarly, both observations (line 248) and modelling (line 305-307) suggest that many encounters were not observed. How does this affect conclusions? This ability to deal with incomplete data is highlighted as a feature of the model. Is there arguments or data that show that it is successful?

      5. In the Introdution and Abstract, one of the motivations for this approach is to capture effects of interactions of the phenotypes within a pair. But then, "Unfortunately our dataset is too small to properly infer the effect of interaction" (line 428-429). First, previous the focus on this unused feature of the model seems misplaced. Second, it is not clear when a dataset is too small and how you know that (presumably by trying a model not shown?).

      6. I think this paper would benefit from more illustration. Figures 1 and 3 are hard to read with small differently shaped symbols, line patterns, and overplotting. I would suggesting making separate plots for males and females to alleviate some of the clutter. Figure 1 b is particularly unreadable. The plots of posteriors are fine, and probably should be in the paper, but I think they should be supplemented with some descriptive graphics that give a feel for the structure of the data and the behaviour of the fish. I would even love to see some visuals of fish mating, maybe stills from the video recordings (or even a supplementary video). Of course, this may be limited by space requirements of the target journal, or nor to the author's taste. But I think you underestimate how cool some of these things are, especially if you aim for a wide audience not well versed in fish mating research.

      Discussion: This is likely beyond the scope of this paper, but I feel that a lot of the questions about the model -- does it work on small datasets; does it successfully account for unobserved encounters; how does its parameters relate to the "classical" measures of sexual selection -- could better be answered with simulated than with real data. I sympathise the use of real data: a good biological example is a lot more convincing to biologists than simulations. However, I feel that there are often too many uncertainties in comparing methods on real data. Results of different methods differ, like the "classical" and the new analyses in this study. But which are right?

      Additional Comments for Authors

      1. The paper would benefit from a two sentence explanation of opportunity for selection, what it measures, and the distinction between opportunity for selection and opportunity for sexual selection.

      2. L8-10: The opening of the abstract sets up the paper to be rather technical, jumping directly into marginal sums of matrices. I think you may want to rethink that approach if the goal is too reach, as the author message said, "a wide audience of ecologists and evolutionary biologists".

      3. For the same reason, I'd advice against the introduction of a 3-dimensional array on line 34. Even if that is mathematically correct, it is immediately going to be summed to the a parental table. Therefore, the 3-dimensional structure doesn't really contribute much, except act as an obstacle to mathematically less savvy readers.

      4. L48-49: "strong link" could be made more precise.

      5. Line 123-124: "The experimental setup is the one used in the "constant environment" treatment in Gauthey et al. (2016)." What is the relationship between this work and Guthey et al 2016? Can this be made clearer?

      6. Lines 226: "po" is not defined in this section. I think the manuscript would benefit from being checked an extra time for mathematical symbols, when they are defined, how they are referred to, and if they can be spelled out in text to help the reader.

      7. Line 270: "Model output" is not a very informative subtitle. I'd suggest dividing the Results into one subsection on the data set, one on the "classical" analyses of sexual selection, and one on the model.

      8. Some of the chocies about model structure (specifically, use of informative priors) is discussed in comments in the model code, but not in the Methods. They should be in the Methods too.


      Review by Peer 1765 (Weight = 0.88)

      Introduction: This paper aims to solve a long-standing issue in sexual selection studies in natural populations: that genetic and behavioural data tell us different things about separate stages of sexuals selection and, therefore, often focus on different processes in sexual selection. While behavioural data tend to focus on mate sampling and mate choice, genetic data provide evidence on the resulting mating/reproductive success. This paper makes an important step in trying to combine both types of data in order to analyse the complete process of sexual selection. Such a tool could substantially advance the field of sexual selection in natural populations. I was very enthousiastic about this approach, until I arrived at Figure 4, which shows that the predictions from model the authors suggest does not correlate at all with the observed data from their case study, suggesting the model is possibly very well thought through, but does not represent the data well. Without empirical evidence, I do not see any reason to put the results of the model above those of the classical methods.

      Merits: The paper describes the model used in a way that is mostly very clearly understandable for non-modelers, which is important for the general use of the proposed method. Moreover they include a case-study which very nicely links the theory to experimental data.

      Critique: The suggested model provides different results from more classical methods of analysing the data. The authors then go on to defend the model as a better way to analyse the data, because they find different results. However, they do not provide evidence that the results from the model fit the data better than the results from the classical analyses. In fact, Figure 4 shows that the model is actually rather bad in predicting observed encounter rates, gamete releases and offspring numbers, because there seems to be no correlation whatsoever between observed and predicted data. For example, many females that did sire large numbers offspring were not predicted to have any offspring according to the model (Fig. 4c). This is not discussed in the paper. I do commend the authors for testing their model on a case study, and combine a theorethical appraoch with an experimental one, but the difference between predicted and observed data should be discussed. The authors could compare the model predictions to the predictions from the classical analyses and see which analyses fit best with the observed data.

      Terminology: Encounter rate is a term that is generally reserved for random events depending on population density and sex ratio. However, the way it is used in the case study (which is certainly the most practical for field observations) includes a certain effect of attraction. In most species, males and females do not generally end up close to a spawning ground/ nest without being attracted by some aspect of the individual or this particular nest. The authors are likely aware of this, because they test for an effect of female size on encounter-rate. The fact that they do not find such an effect does not exclude that their may have been attraction to other characteristics of the female or the nest-site. Therefore, I would suggest to use another word for encounter (for example inspection or visit) to avoid confusion between an event where individuals have likely already been attracted to each other (as used in the case study) and a random "encounter". The latter is, however, impossible to quantify in the field, because it is generally impossible to spot whether two individuals have noticed each other and I see no reason to include it in the model.

      Discussion: The paper addresses a very important issue in the study of sexual selection: how to combine behavioural and genetic data to study the strength of sexual selection. As the authors rightly argue, both types of data omit important processes in sexual selection and very few studies manage to get both types of data for all (or even most) mating events. The model they suggest would make use of incomplete behavioural and genetic data to explain the underlying processess. Such a model could provide an important tool for sexual selection studies. However, the case study the authors provide suggests that the model is not very good at predicting real case scenarios. Therefore, the autors should investigate how the model could be changed to reflect their experimental data. Doing so would provide an important paper that would be very valuable to the field.


      Review by Peer 1758 (Weight = 0.85)

      Introduction: This manuscript offers a statistical alternative to classical sexual selection gradient analysis by using Bayesian inference that allows accounting for male and female effects simultaneously. Furthermore, the authors highlight that mating success is generally underestimated because it is based on the genetic assignment of offspring. The authors use their own data on the mating behaviour and reproductive output of brown trout to compare the results from classical selection analysis with their Bayesian model and find differences between the two.

      Merits: This manuscript is relevant because it highlights limitations of classical sexual selection gradient analysis, and offers a statistical alternative to empiricist with suitable data. I have the following suggestions, which I hope will be useful in revising the authors' original contribution. Also, I welcome that the authors made their research transparent by adding their data and code. However, I want to make clear that I could not review their code because of incompatibilities with JAGS and my software. ​

      Critique: The authors statistical alternative is motivated by two shortcomings to (a) account for the interdependence of females and males in sexually reproducing species and (b) getting a grip on the copulatory behaviour instead of inferring it from offspring data. Whilst I agree that (b) is pressing, (a) depends on the mating systems, e.g. in strictly monogamous species, male and female identity overlap and fitting both would not be informative or appropriate for the analysis of sexually selected individual phenotypic traits. Hence, the applicability of the authors' model would profit from information on its suitability for different mating systems, i.e. expand on "a variety of biological systems", l24, in the discussion. Also, the authors approach also relies on empirical data. In other words, the best model does not change that if mating success lacks behavioural observations, and it usually does, we can only make incomplete inferences. In my view, the main contribution of this manuscript is thus to serve as an important reminder of the complexities at play and the importance of comprehensive data collection, rather than a new tool for measuring sexual selection. Also, the pitfalls and shortcomings, (e.g. bias in stochasticity, what is the null model, operational sex ratio) when measuring sexual selection have been comprehensively illustrated here (Klug, Heuschele, Jennions, & Kokko, 2010) and here (Jennions, Kokko, & Klug, 2012). So, I recommend a more inclusive portrait of the matter and attuning with published jargon (e.g. Table 1 in (Klug, Heuschele, Jennions, & Kokko, 2010).

      • I advocate that the full results of the linear regression analyses as well as the alternative JAGS model are presented in table format in the main text. Results in the supporting information get missed easily, and plots cannot substitute full estimates.

      • The authors could expand more on discussing their most interesting finding, which is the discrepancy between their results using classical regression analyses and Bayesian analysis.

      Discussion: This manuscript is motivated by two shortcomings of the classical sexual selection gradient analysis. I agree with the relevance of one of them (i.e. measuring mating success) and yet argue that the relevance of accounting for the additive effects of the sexes for reproductive success is highly dependent on the species mating system, which the authors should address. I also think that the authors should make clearer that their analysis still depends on empiricists collecting data on mating success. I welcome the authors approach to use their own data to compare whether body size of male and female brown trout might be sexually selected. If the authors revise the current version, their manuscript will serve as an important reminder of what to look out for when analysing potentially sexually selected traits.

      References Jennions, M. D., Kokko, H., & Klug, H. (2012). The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02451.x

      Klug, H., Heuschele, J., Jennions, M. D., & Kokko, H. (2010). The mismeasurement of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01921.x

      Schlicht, E., & Kempenaers, B. (2013). Effects of social and extra-pair mating on sexual selection in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Evolution, 67(5), 1420-1434. http://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12073

      Additional Comments for Authors l14: be clearer on "costly" or delete because costs were not measured

      l27: add or consider selection gradient, see Table 1 in Klug et al 2010

      l44: ambiguous "to do so". Which of the indices exactly?

      l52 infertile not unfertile

      l53 reference "cost of reproduction"

      l64 reference costs

      l65 back up the claim of "are essential to understand..."

      l68 better name the "fourth definition"

      l88-89 reference

      l93 define "a pair", e.g. socially monogamous? This could be an opportunity to introduce the mating system you want to target

      l109-111 reference?

      l113-115 reference?

      l116 in brown trout? Please add citation

      l120 "a" semi-natural...

      l120-123 split into two sentences to improve readability, e.g. This period represents the trout...

      l124: chemically communicated?

      l129: highly female biased, which might be biological meaningful or a catching bias, please explain. Plus this skew in adult sex ratio will affect the variance in mating success, i.e. "chance variation in mating success is higher when there are fewer potential mates per individual of the focal sex" (Jennions et al 2012), this affects both your statistical approaches but it nowhere mentioned

      l132 how did you sex? Molecularly?

      l145: one or multiple observers? also "taken" not "took"

      l148 any proof? repeatability tests? references for the claim?

      l149 say how you dealt with the 30% for analyses

      l150 rephrase "the zone", e.g. female nesting/egg release site, etc.

      l156 consider "spawning" or gamete release instead of copulating

      l159 "degree day" reads misplaced, only use estimate of time after spawning

      l172 its

      l186 consider making clearer that zero's were included

      l247 depending on where you want to submit avoid fish jargon: "redd"

      l249 give output of all linear regression analyses in table

      l271 I suggest moving these to the main text

      l278 why not report Credible Intervals instead of SDs? Also, SDs show high uncertainty in estimates, which should be addressed in the discussion

      l333-4 reference

      l336 rephrase "to account for..."

      l335 give time unit, e.g. over the course of the experiment

      l336 Comment: I disagree because sexual selection is commonly referred to as the opportunity for evolutionary change, which is the variance in relative fitness and should consider all reproductively mature adults, hence should be measured among individuals that do and do not interact/mate. Especially the latter is usually omitted, but ignoring unmated individuals in a population will automatically inflate the variance of the successful subset (see also (Schlicht & Kempenaers, 2013)).

      l418-19 rephrase, unclear

      Plots: General comment: It might be the pdfs but the quality of plots is low and generally offsetting the raw data a bit, e.g. jittering would help viewing individual data points


      Review by Peer 1761 (Weight = 0.67)

      Introduction: The authors point out how the study of mating systems only using behavioural observations or genetic data usually fails to explain accurately the breeding processes and reproductive outcomes, as well as their relationship with sexual selection features.

      They propose a model that combines both behavioural and genetic data, and a phenotypic trait linked to sexual selection, using brown trout as model species.

      Their model includes several breeding variables behavioural and genetic, and it very adaptable as is able to incorporate other environmental or biological variables if needed.

      They show how genetic and behavioural results analyzed separately may differ. Also, how the results from their model and the classic regression analyses to analyse this data also differ, and so, they aim to explain why.

      Merits: The model they have built seems flexible enough to be adapted to multiple taxa and systems.

      Critique: There is no reference at all about ethics permissions to perform the described experiment. I am quite shocked about this since high numbers of individuals from a wild population were killed.

      There is no mention on the conservation status of the species, the permits obtained to carry out the capture and experiment, the effect of the capture system on the ecosystem, or the explanation/justification for the use of lethal methods.

      For example, I find electrofishing highly non-targeted and I wonder how was its impact on other non-target fish (and non-fish) species. I believe that assembling a team of fishermen to get the same number of adult specimens would be easy enough to arrange.

      My point is not whether the methods were ethically acceptable or not (that is for the journals' ethics committees to decide) but to, at least, justify and explain their use.

      Model testing: I understand that in ecology studies usually researchers don't get all behavioural or all genetic data, and that is what the models try to compensate for. However, when testing models in a biological system the ideal situation is to work in a system where almost all information can be collected (ussualy under lab conditions), build a model with all that information, and then subsample the data (as to simulate a real ecological study) to test the model performance.

      In this study, however, the initial sampling for the data is quite small, specially for behavioural observations (30min/day). Then, the results from the model are quite different from the results obtained from more classic approaches. The authors offer some hypotheses to explain these differences, but they can't be really tested to see whether the authors' model results are better in explaining the system or not.

      All that said, I have to admit that I lack the mathematical background to fully understand and evaluate the model design and performance, and a more qualified researcher should do that.

      Discussion: Although the experimental approach to test the validity of the model predictions could have been better, their attempt to combine behavioural and genetic data in mating system studies and relate it to sexual selection is an important step forward in the behavioural field.

      Hopefully, more efforts like this will be made to reconcile both aspects of the study of mating systems that rapidly changed from behavioural observations only to genetic analyses only.


      Review by Peer 1773 (Weight = 0.51)

      Introduction: In accordance with traditional approach to estimate the effect of sexual selection on phenotypic trait the number of mates should be regressed on a target phenotypic trait in a separate model for each sex. Such analysis ignores common investment of the sexes into mating success. The authors propose a new approach, which allow combining behavioral and genetic data, thereby enabling to gather information through the successive processes of encounter, gamete release and offspring production.

      Merits: The new approach accounted for the three-dimensional structure of the data: males, females and mating occasions. This allowed a qualified definition of mating success and disentangling the joint effects of male and female phenotypes on the different components of reproductive success. Three important features that lack in the traditional approach characterize the authors' model:

      1) conditioning of each process (encounter, gamete release and offspring production) on the preceding one,

      2) simultaneous estimation of the effect of male and female phenotype,

      3) random individual effects.

      ​The authors tested their model on a brown trout and obtained quite different results for the two approaches.

      ​The model can be used for a variety of biological systems where behavioral and genetic data are available.

      Critique: The model should be tested on a larger sample.

      The title of the manuscript is not very successful.

      ​There is a couple of misprints: p. 7 l. 139 and p. 8 l. 159.

      Discussion: This is very important when new algorythms allow to obtain more information from the same set of data. Hopefully, it would be of great importance if the model can be developed to account for real behavior traits in species presenting complex courtship behavior like Drosophila for instance.

    1. Like the national debt, the homeless population, gun ownership, and job insecurity, television grew prodigiously in the 1980s.

      I find it very interesting that this article put television in the same category as big issues like gun ownership and the homeless population. We may not think of it as a huge deal now but years ago it was a big topic.

    Annotators

    1. However, the artists of West Meets East do not possess institutional power, and are instead most likely more suppressed by institutional norms of boundary and difference that often accompany immigration.

      This is an important thing to bring up. That the artists (Bengali Girls) themselves did not have power. It was interesting to tie this to agitator/constructor as we usually talk about the "main" artist(s) in a work as having influence and in this case, the girls themselves did not. It brings up the point that creating change/making an impact is quite difficult to do outside of art anyway and even harder when we take into social identities (of artists) and the protection or support afforded to them. On the other hand, I wish there was the inclusion of Loraine Leeson and the group/organization she worked for it. Leeson or the group may have had some institutional social power, financial support (independent, donor, etc.) even if it was small in order to put it up in a public like a billboard or to get the materials maybe?? Like you shared, it is unlikely that the Bengali Girls themselves, or just anyone in general could have the power to hang their work of that size in a public space with an encased description ( I think). Also, I am not sure, but maybe there were protections put on the work from the city to make sure it was in condition or no harm came to it??? These may be interesting hidden components of the exhibition to consider

    1. Since I weeded out the folks that don’t teach their kids logic in the first two paragraphs, as representatives of the real world it’s up to the rest of us to spread the knowledge. It won’t be easy. The best thing we can do is teach these thought processes to our children, so that they may look at other children with looks of bewilderment when other children are unable to solve simple tasks. Hopefully, they will not simply do the task for them, but teach them to think. I’m not saying we need to build a whole new generation of project managers and analysts, but it would be better than a generation of task-oriented mindless office drones with untied shoelaces, shoving on a door at the Midvale School for the Gifted.

      As the author mentioned in the first two and last paragraphs about children, I think he is trying to compare children then and now and to tell us that we should raise our kids the same way as we are raised, so they can fully develop their critical thinking skills to help others.

    1. to countries without regard to the recipients’ needs or capacity.

      <br>

      Source Excerpt (Source 1): Letter to Louis F. Medeiros, June 23, 1959, about "military assistance to Iraq and other similar nations ... [para break] ... It has been discussed in relation to arms shipments to Iraq, jet shipments to Ethiopia, and the program of assistance which we are carrying out in Pakistan and also in South American countries. It is quite clear that many of our arms shipments have no relation to strategic requirements and in fact are often unusable by nationals of the state to which they are sent."

      Source Excerpt (Source 2): Second: "What about the balance between military and economic aid?" Answer: "This is another question in this field of foreign aid which has become blurred by discussion. It seems to me that one first has to decide whether the exigencies of the international situation really demand the kind of forces which we support throughout the world. My own view is that we have tended to follow military aid program patterns which were designed to fit situations which have now changed drastically from the standpoint of our over-all military strategy. I feel that we may be the victims of the same kind of administrative and policy lag in the area of planning military aid as I think we were faced with in connection with missile development. I don't think this problem boils down to a question of military aid versus economic and technical assistance. There are many situations where we need both. But because military programs can impose such a dreadful burden on any economy, particularly that of a less industrially developed country, I think we should be very careful in terms of both their assets and liabilities, both to us and the country concerned."

      Data Sources:<br> Source 1: https://doi.org/10.5064/F68G8HMM/F9FWOA <br> Source 2: https://doi.org/10.5064/F68G8HMM/UYLXQE

      Full Citation (Source 1): JFK to Louis F. Medeiros, June 23, 1959, Pre-presidential Papers-Senate Files, Box 716, JFK Library.

      Full Citation (Source 2): JFK, Draft, N.D.(titled "What about the Balance between Military and Economic Aid?"), Pre-presidential Papers-Senate Files, Box 561, JFK Library.

    2. to maintain a status-quo wherever we find existing regimes anti-communistic.”

      <br>

      Source Excerpt: "We in America are apt to think of Asia in terms of teeming millions who live in squalor and who are deemed to no better fate. Poverty, lack of medical care and illiteracy are indeed the first to meet the eye of the new-comer, to that area. But the future of Asia may be made bright if we will only study its potential, and the alliance of Asia and democracy can be made steadfast if we heed the warning. [para break] The rough bottom of Asia's problem is landlordism. Who shall own the land. For centiries [sic] it has been in the hands of the powerful and wealthy few. The peasant has concluded that he has no escape but revolution itself from the crushing yoke of tenancy. [para break] We send technical experts abroad to help in seed selection, soil conservation, malaria control and the like. But we never raise or voices to better the economic lot under a land system where increased production merely enriches the few. We seem to forget that health programs and the like merely increase the number of people among whom the existing poverty must be rationed[.] [para break] We put billions of dollars behind corrupt and reactionary governments which exempt the rich from income taxes and fasten the hold of oligarchy tighter and tighter on the nation. [para break] The fact is that America has been so engrossed in providing a defense against Communism that we have lost the initiative. Our great weakness has been our negative attitude. We have been anti-communist. We have been "Pro" nothing. [para break] No matter how feverish our efforts, the red tide of Communism seems to spread abroad. We are seized with panic as the water laps on feeble dikes. So, we rush to the support of every group which opposes Soviet Communism. That puts us in partnership with the corrupt and reactionary groups whose policies breed the discontent on which Soviet Communism feeds and prospers--groups which might have long ago collapsed if it had not been for our assistance. In short we even support and sustain corruption and tyranny to maintain a status-quo wherever we find existing regimes anti-communistic." [end of page]

      Data Source: https://doi.org/10.5064/F68G8HMM/GALQ86

      Full Citation: JFK, Speech to Massachusetts Federation of Taxpayers Associations, April 21, 1951, Pre-presidential Papers-House Files, Box 95, JFK Library. (p. 6)

    3. “Uncle Sugar is as dangerous a role for us to play as Uncle Shylock.”

      <br>

      Source Excerpt: "There is not time today to fill in further details of this journey. But there is and must be time for all of us to try and understand the meaning of these events, to bring some order out of our confusion and what we ought to do about them. I say advisedly 'all of us', for just as I remarked the other night -- 'Our Foreign Policy is too important a thing to be left to the experts and the diplomats alone'. [para break] We must, I suggest, try and think in terms of three categories of things -- the things we cannot and must not do, the things we are doing that we should not be doing, and the things we are not doing that we should be doing. [para break] Let me first list the things we cannot and must not do. They are: [para break] FIRST: We cannot reform the world. We cannot and should not impose upon this Eastern world our values, our institutions or our customs. True, there is a basic sameness in all men, the desire to be free from want, from illness, from tyranny. But, however much we may value our conceptions of suffrage, our mechanical well-being, even our bathtubs, the East may think little or nothing of them. [para break] SECOND: We cannot abolish the poverty and want that for centuries has characterized this area. There is just not enough money in the world to relieve the poverty of all the millions of this world who may be threatened by Communism. We cannot and should not attempt to buy their freedom from this threat; all we can do is help them achieve that freedom if they really wish to do so. Our resources are not limitless. The vision of a bottle of milk for every Hottentot is a nice one, but it is not only beyond our grasp; it is far beyond our reach. Moreover, we ought to know now that more expenditures bring no lasting results. People who are with us merely because of the things they get from us are weak reeds to lean upon. And we do these peoples no good by such uncontrollable expenditures, for we tend by our very generosity to create a spirit of dependency that... destroys their will to rely upon their own strength. The thirty billions that we are spending in Europe since the war have yet to prove that they have made for the self-reliance of that area and will make those nations worthy bastions of defense. But whatever may be true there, to repeat such a procedure in Asia or in the South Pacific is impossible. We must make this plain not only to our people at home but plain beyond any peradventure of doubt to our Asiatic friends. There must be no misunderstanding on this score. Uncle Sugar is as dangerous a role for us to play as Uncle Shylock. [para break] Now let one turn to my second group of the things we are doing that we should not be doing. [para break] FIRST: Our representatives abroad should be not merely citizens of the United States but Americans dedicated to the principles that we live by. We have no need to apologize that is American, from the merchants of Boston, to the backwoodsmen of Tennessee or the loggers of the great Northwest. All this is America. We want no aping of foreign customs or the personal arrogation to our representatives of privileges given to them because they come from a powerful country. With some notable exceptions who are doing a real job for us under difficult circumstances, our representatives abroad seem to be a breed of their own, moving mainly in their own limited circles not knowing too much of the people to whom they are accredited, unconscious of the fact that their role is not tennis and cocktails but the interpretation to a foreign country of the meaning of American life and the interpretation to us of that country's aspirations and aims. [para break] SECOND: We must make no broad, unlimited grant, to any government. Aid and help in the matter of techniques is a different thing. It is concrete and business-like to tender help along these lines. But as some of our recent experience demonstrates, more grants of money are debilitating and wasteful. More than this, they favor the 'ins' as contrasted from the 'outs'. Techniques, however, favor neither; Service and 'know-how' are neutral. [para break] THIRD: Our propaganda must reach all levels and all types of men. Nothing seemed quite so futile to me as the current practices of the Voice of America. Fashioned to short-wave radio sets that only the rich can afford, often transmitted in languages that only the rich have been...

      Data Source: https://doi.org/10.5064/F68G8HMM/C5SL2T

      Full Citation: JFK, Speech to Boston Chamber of Commerce, November 19, 1951, Pre-presidential Papers, Campaign Files, Box 102, JFK Library. (pp. 7-8)

    4. the East may think little or nothing of them.”

      <br>

      Source Excerpt: "There is not time today to fill in further details of this journey. But there is and must be time for all of us to try and understand the meaning of these events, to bring some order out of our confusion and what we ought to do about them. I say advisedly 'all of us', for just as I remarked the other night -- 'Our Foreign Policy is too important a thing to be left to the experts and the diplomats alone'. [para break] We must, I suggest, try and think in terms of three categories of things -- the things we cannot and must not do, the things we are doing that we should not be doing, and the things we are not doing that we should be doing. [para break] Let me first list the things we cannot and must not do. They are: [para break] FIRST: We cannot reform the world. We cannot and should not impose upon this Eastern world our values, our institutions or our customs. True, there is a basic sameness in all men, the desire to be free from want, from illness, from tyranny. But, however much we may value our conceptions of suffrage, our mechanical well-being, even our bathtubs, the East may think little or nothing of them. [para break] SECOND: We cannot abolish the poverty and want that for centuries has characterized this area. There is just not enough money in the world to relieve the poverty of all the millions of this world who may be threatened by Communism. We cannot and should not attempt to buy their freedom from this threat; all we can do is help them achieve that freedom if they really wish to do so. Our resources are not limitless. The vision of a bottle of milk for every Hottentot is a nice one, but it is not only beyond our grasp; it is far beyond our reach. Moreover, we ought to know now that more expenditures bring no lasting results. People who are with us merely because of the things they get from us are weak reeds to lean upon. And we do these peoples no good by such uncontrollable expenditures, for we tend by our very generosity to create a spirit of dependency that..."

      Data Source: https://doi.org/10.5064/F68G8HMM/C8DNYB

      Full Citation: JFK, Speech to Boston Chamber of Commerce, November 19, 1951, Pre-presidential Papers, Campaign Files, Box 102, JFK Library. (p. 7)

    1. [Note: this preprint has been peer reviewed by eLife. The decision letter after peer review, based on three reviews, follows. The decision was sent on 17 June 2019.]

      Summary

      Natural Killer (NK) and the ILC1 subset of innate lymphoid cells share related functions in host defense but have been argued to arise from distinct pathways. Park et al present new evidence challenging this concept. They show that murine Toxoplasma gondii infection promotes the differentiation of NK cells into an ILC1-like cell population which is stable and long-lasting, even after the infection has been cleared. These T. gondii induced cells, unlike Eomes+CD49a- NK cells, are Eomes-CD49a+T-bet+ and therefore resemble ILC1 cells. The authors additionally show that their differentiation involves Eomes down regulation and is STAT-4 dependent, However, in common with NK cells and distinct from ILC1 the T. gondii induced "ILC-like" population circulates to blood and lungs. Finally, the authors employ single cell RNAseq to examine the heterogeneity of the major T. gondii induced innate lymphocyte populations and their NK vs ILC relatedness as assessed by gene expression. Together, their observations establish a previously unappreciated developmental link between NK and ILC1cells in the context of infection.

      The 3 reviewers and editor agree that this is an important contribution that sheds new light on the developmental relationship of NK and ILC1 cells, a scientific issue that has received considerable attention in the innate immunity field. Although extensive, most of the criticisms raised can be addressed by revisions to the manuscript. One additional experiment is requested to provide a missing control.

      Essential Revisions

      All reviewers had a major concern about how this new population of T. gondii induced innate cells should be referred to in the manuscript. Based on the single cell RNAseq data, these cells (cluster 10) are still closer to NK cells than to ILC1s (Figure 5f and Suppl Fig 4e) despite their loss in Eomes expression and acquisition of CD49a expression. Thus, one could easily think of them as "Eomes negative NK" or "ex-NK" cells rather than ILC1s, and to simply refer to them as Eomes-CD49a+ ILC1 cells may be misleading . For this reason, the authors should modify the title of the paper and change their designation throughout the manuscript. We suggest "ILC1-like" as a good descriptor. In addition, although it is clear that the "Eomes negative NK" cells that are generated during T. gondii infection are transcriptionally and epigenetically distinct from the NK cells in the steady state and NK cells after infection (Figure 7 and suppl Figure 6), these "Eomes negative NK" cells referred to as "T. gondii-induced ILC1s" were not directly compared with classical ILC1s. Based on the single cell RNAseq data, these cells may not express many of the ILC1-related signature genes. Therefore, again, the authors need to be cautious in referring to them as ILC1 cells.

      A second concern was that the NK 1.1 depletion shown in Supplemental figure 1 was performed with a PBS rather than isotope matched immunoglobulin control which is considered unacceptable. The authors should repeat at least once with proper control Ig to make sure this is not issue. It is not necessary to repeat entire survival curve just experiments shown in A and B and initial survival to make sure there is no death in controls vs. antibody treated.

    1. Can you show that the test error is an unbiased estimate of the generalization error? That is, that the expected value of the test error is equal to the generalization error.

      I think I may have a solution for this one, but I want to share to validate if anyone else reaches a similar way to solve the problem.

      First, we start with the definition of the expectation of the Average Test Error:

      $$\mathbb{E}_{p(\vec{x}, y)}[\text{Average Test Error}]$$

      $$=\mathbb{E}_{p(\vec{x}, y)}[\frac{1}{M}\sum_{m=1}^M L(y^{(m)}, f(\vec{x}^{(m)}))] \quad \vec{x}^{(m)}, y^{(m)}\sim p(\vec{x}, y) $$

      Since the expectation is a linear operator as seen in this note, we move the expectation operator inside the summation:

      $$\frac{1}{M}\sum_{m=1}^M \mathbb{E}_{p(\vec{x}, y)}[L(y^{(m)}, f(\vec{x}^{(m)}))] \quad \vec{x}^{(m)}, y^{(m)}\sim p(\vec{x}, y)$$

      From the definition of expectation, we have: $$\mathbb{E}{p(\vec{x}, y)}[L(y^{(m)}, f(\vec{x}^{(m)}))] \quad \vec{x}^{(m)}, y^{(m)}\sim p(\vec{x}, y)$$ $$=\int\limits{\vec{x}}\int\limits_{y}L(y, f(\vec{x}))p(\vec{x},y) \, dy \, d\vec{x}$$

      Therefore our expectation becomes:

      $$\frac{1}{M}\sum_{m=1}^M \int\limits_{\vec{x}}\int\limits_{y}L(y, f(\vec{x}))p(\vec{x},y) \, dy \, d\vec{x}$$

      Which is simply an average over a constant, thus we have:

      $$\mathbb{E}_{p(\vec{x}, y)}[\text{Average Test Error}]$$

      $$ = \int\limits_{\vec{x}}\int\limits_{y}L(y, f(\vec{x}))p(\vec{x},y) \, dy \, d\vec{x}$$

      Which is our generalization error.

    1. First, the self may be seen as a social actor, who enacts roles and displays traits by performing behaviors in the presence of others.

      I think the word choice here is so interesting. I love the way he compares "self" as an actor (i.e. life as a movie, others as the audience.) It helps us see that the characteristics we display to others as what our "self" is, are similar to those of a movie script.

    2. What is your story? What kind of a narrative are you working on? As you look to the past and imagine the future, what threads of continuity, change, and meaning do you discern? For many people, the most dramatic and fulfilling efforts to change the self happen

      This passage is very interesting because as humans we always think about what happen next. Some of us don't focus on the present but focus on the past that cannot be change and also focus on the future that not even there but want to pictures in our mind about what our future would be like . when it can be drastically different from what we expected. I believe what the author is trying to say is your story is what you make of which means you can use your story as a positive aspects , that can help others related to your experience or you can warn others to not repeat the same cycle that you have experiences. or you can use you story as a negative aspects that won't be helpful but instead feel regrets or blame yourself for something you probably may or may not have any control of. But made a decision not to take control of you own story that can turn into a. positive to be a inspirational to others. I also believe that the choices we make reflects who we are as a person and along with the story is the experience that we have whether good or bad is how we react to everything that happening around us and the lesson within ourselves that the story have taught us

    3. , the self may be seen as a social actor, who enacts roles and displays traits by performing behaviors in the presence of others

      I think that although it is important to stay true to yourself, being a "social actor" isn't always a bad thing. I think that this could also be interpreted as 'code switching' in different social situations. For example, it is almost necessary that we act differently around our teacher than we do around our friends, or our parents, or our doctors, etc.

    1. I am writing this review for the Drummond and Sauer comment on Mathur and VanderWeele (2019). To note, I am familiar with the original meta-analyses considered (one of which I wrote), the Mathur and VanderWeele (henceforth MV2019) article, and I’ve read both Drummond and Sauer’s comment on MV2019 and Mathur’s review of Drummond and Sauer’s comment on MV2019 (hopefully that wasn’t confusing). On balance, I think Drummond and Sauer’s (henceforth DSComment) comment under review here is a very important contribution to this debate. I tended to find DSComment to be convincing and was comparatively less convinced by Mathur’s review or, indeed, MV2019. I hope my thoughts below are constructive.

      It’s worth noting that MV2019 suffered from several primary weaknesses. Namely:

      1. On one hand, it didn’t really tell us anything we didn’t already know, namely that near-zero effect sizes are common for meta-analyses in violent video game research.
      2. MV2019, aside from one brief statement as DSComment notes, neglected the well-known methodological issues that tend to spuriously increase effect sizes (unstandardized aggression measures, self-ratings of violent game content, identified QRPs in some studies such as the Singapore dataset, etc.) This resulted in a misuse of meta-analytic procedures.
      3. MV2019 naïvely interprets (as does Mathur’s review of DSComment) near-zero effect sizes as meaningful, despite numerous reasons not to do so given concerns of false positives.
      4. MV2019, for an ostensible compilation of meta-analyses, curiously neglect other meta-analyses, such as those by John Sherry or Furuyama-Kanamori & Doi (2016).

      At this juncture, publication bias, particularly for experimental studies, has been demonstrated pretty clearly (e.g. Hilgard et al., 2017). I have two comments here. MV2019 offered a novel and not well-tested alternative approach (highlighted again by Mathur’s review) for bias, however, I did not find the arguments convincing as this approach appears extrapolative and produces results that simply aren’t true. For instance, the argument that 100% of effect sizes in Anderson 2010 are above 0, is quickly falsified merely by looking at the reported effect sizes in the studies included, at least some of which are below .00. Therefore, this would appear to clearly indicate some error in the procedure of MV2019.

      Further, we don't need statistics to speculate about publication bias in Anderson et al. (2010) as there are actual specific examples of published null studies missed by Anderson et al. (see Ferguson & Kilburn, 2010). Further, the publication of null studies in the years immediately following (e.g. von Salisch et al., 2011) indicate that Anderson's search for unpublished studies was clearly biased (indeed, I had unpublished data at that time but was not asked by Anderson and colleagues for it). So there's no need at all for speculation given we have actual examples of missed studies and a fair number of them.

      It might help to highlight also that traditional publication bias techniques probably are only effective with small sample experimental studies. For large sample correlational/longitudinal studies, effect sizes tend to be a bit more homogeneous, hovering closely to zero. In such studies the accumulation of p-values near .05 is unlikely given the power of small studies. Relatively simple QRPs can make p-values jump rapidly from non-significance to something well below.05. Thus, traditional publication bias procedures may return null results for this pool of studies, despite QRPs, and thus, publication bias having taken place.

      It might also help to note that meta-analyses with weak effects are very fragile to unreported null studies, which probably exist in greater numbers (particularly for large n studies) that would be indicated by publication bias techniques.

      I agree with Mathur’s comment about experiments not always offering the best evidence, given lack of generalizability to real-world aggression (indeed, that’s been a long-standing concern). However, it might help DSComment to note that, by this point, probably the pool of evidence least likely to find effects are longitudinal studies. I’ve got two preregistered longitudinal analyses of existing datasets myself (here I want to make clear that citing my work is by no means necessary for my positive evaluation of any revisions on DSComment), and there are other fine studies (such as Lobel et al., 2017, Breuer et al., 2015, Kuhn et al., 2018; von Salisch et al., 2011, etc.) The authors may also want to note Przybylski and Weinstein (2019) which offer an excellent example of a preregistered correlational study.

      Indeed, in a larger sense, as far as evidence goes, DSComment could highlight recent preregistered evidence from multiple sources (McCarthy et al., 2016; Hilgard et al., 2019, Przybylski & Weinstein, 2019, Ferguson & Wang, 2019, etc.) This would seem to be the most crucial evidence and, aside from one excellent correlational study (Ivory et al.) all of the preregistered results have been null. Even if we think the tiny effect sizes in existing metas provide evidence in support of hypotheses (and we shouldn’t), these preregistered studies suggest we shouldn’t trust even those tiny effects to be “true.”

      The weakest aspect of MV2019 was the decision to interpret near-zero effects as meaningful. Mathur, argues that tiny effects can be important once spread over a population. However, this is merely speculation, and there’s no data to support it. It’s kind of a truthy thing scholars tend to say defensively when confronted by the possibility that effect sizes don’t support their hypotheses. By making this argument, Mathur invites an examination of population data where convincing evidence (Markey, Markey & French, 2015; Cunningham et al., 2016; Beerthuizen, Weijters & van der Laan, 2017) shows that violent game consumption is associated with reduced violence in society. Granted, some may express caution about looking at societal-level data, but here is where scholars can’t have it both ways: One can’t make claims about societal-level effects, and then not want to look at the societal data. Such arguments make unfalsifiable claims and are unscientific in nature.

      The other issue is that this line of argument makes effect sizes irrelevant. If we’re going to interpret effect sizes no matter how near to zero as hypothesis supportive, so long as they are “statistically significant” (which, given the power of meta-analyses, they almost always are), then we needn’t bother reporting effect sizes at all. We’re still basically slaves to NHST, just using effect sizes as a kind of fig leaf for the naked bias of how we interpret weak results.

      Also, that’s just not how effect sizes work. They can’t be sprinkled like pixie dust over a population to make them meaningful.

      As DSComment points out, effect sizes that are this small have high potential for Type 1 error. Funder and Ozer (2019) recent contributed to this discussion in a way I think was less than helpful (to be very clear I respect Funder and Ozer greatly, but disagree with many of their comments on this specific issue). Yet, as they note, interpretation of tiny effects is based on such effects being “reliable”, a condition clearly not in evidence for violent game research given the now extensive literature on the systematic methodological flaws in that literature.

      In her comment Dr. Mathur dismisses the comparison with ESP research, but I disagree with (or dismiss?) this dismissal. The fact that effect sizes in meta-analyses for violent game research are identical to those for “magic” is exactly why we should be wary of interpreting such effect sizes as hypothesis supportive. Saying violent game effects are more plausible is irrelevant (and presumably the ESP people would disagree). However, the authors of DSComment might strengthen their argument by noting that some articles have begun examining nonsense outcomes within datasets. For example, in Ferguson and Wang (2019) we show that the (weak and in that case non-significant) effects for violent game playing are no different in predicting aggression than nonsense variables (indeed, the strongest effect was for the age at which one had moved to a new city). Orben and Przybylski (2019) do something similar and very effective with screen time. Point being, we have an expanding literature to suggest that the interpretation of such weak effects is likely to lead us to numerous false positive errors.

      The authors of DSComment might also note that MV2019 commit a fundamental error of meta-analysis, namely assuming that the “average effect size wins!” When effect sizes are heterogeneous (as Mathur appears to acknowledge unless I misunderstood) the pooled average effect size is not a meaningful estimator of the population effect size. That’s particularly true given GIGO (garbage in, garbage out). Where QRPs have been clearly demonstrated for some studies in this realm (see Przybylski & Weinstein, 2019 for some specific examples of documentation involving the Singapore dataset), the pooled average effect size, however it is calculated, is almost certainly a spuriously high estimate of true effects.

      DSComment could note that other issues such as citation bias are known to be associated with spuriously high effect sizes (Ferguson, 2015), another indication that researcher behaviors are likely pulling effect sizes above the actual population effect size.

      Overall, I don’t think MV2019 were very familiar with this field and, appearing unaware of the serious methodological errors endemic in much of the literature which pull effect sizes spuriously high. In the end, they really didn’t say anything we didn’t already know (the effect sizes across metas tend to be near zero), and their interpretation of these near-zero effect sizes was incorrect.

      With that in mind, I do think DSComment is an important part of this debate and is well worth publishing. I hope my comments here are constructive.

      Signed, Chris Ferguson

    1. e students may learn that compliance is important and that certain behaviors will be academically rewarded and allowed to compensate for learning deficiencies. On the other hand, instructional strategies such as project-based learning or community-based learning, to name just two of many possible options, may communicate specific messages

      I don't know how I feel about this. I feel like every aspect of school is just compliance and learning how to make good grades. I think that yeah, project and community based learning help with our social skills and all the aspects mentioned below but I feel like we do all of that just to still get a good grade. As a student, I love doing group projects more than just sitting and hearing a lecture but at the same time I feel more productive listening to a lecture.

    1. However, many of us are not fully aware of our values, and as a result can at times think, say and do things that are not in alignment.

      Possibly we do something out of alignment with our values, or possibly we don't fully understand our values and that we may have a value, such as self-protection, that we don't wish to acknowledge.

    1. It represents the smallest complete television picture umt. Bu~ images already are combinations of several different signs at once and mvolve a complex set of denotations and connotations. Further-more, if we use the frame as the smallest unit of meaning, we ignore the soundtrack, where ½o second would not necessarily capture a meaning-~l sound and where speech, sound effects, and music may be occurring simultaneously.

      Television is complicated! There are so many variables to break down at any given moment. I think this offers us a sort of break. That to any one person one frame is packed with information. And then when you add all of the frames with even one 20 minute show you have a mound of information to digest now. Analysis of tv is hard but so worth it.

    Annotators

    1. Extrapolating our results to the general population, we estimate that asking about citizenship would reduce the share of Hispanics recorded by the Census by approximately 6.07 million, or around 12.03 percent of the 2010 Hispanic population – a sizable reduction in the share of the U.S. population that would be recorded as Hispanic.

      This sentence which I think may suitable to represent the independent and dependent variables.

    1. We think what they want is flexibility, but actually what they need is structure

      this is true for me, I do want flexibility to take as many classes as possible because I have seen a lot of interesting classes that is not related to my major

    1. One would think that if there's play in the joints, that that would include the concept that States are free to say we don't want to spend money from the public FIs on houses of worship. Now, you say this affects free exercise. We seem to be confusing money with religious practice.

      Justice Sotomayor would be my second guess for the two justices that dissented themselves from the decision. I think this statement here validates her thoughts by saying "we". Now this may just be her generalizing who believes this, but to me it came across as part of her duties do not include the concepts of funding houses of worship.

    1. The authors make the point in ch4 that annotation is not really conversation. I think Miranda is correct here, that annotation is a work-around for the fact that texts are not interactive. Ultimately, are we just fooling ourselves by annotating a text?

      “Older” annotations (those before the digital age) may have commonly been seen by an audience of one, but this thread of annotations here is a good example of the beginning of a conversation developing.

      Of course there are also examples as seen in Owen Gingerich’s The Book Nobody Read in which professors and students actively copied down annotations from one copy of a book into their own copies. In these cases, there may have been active verbal discussions as these changes were made and learning of the subject progressed.

      Many textbook publishers also issue either paper or digital errata which in some sense are a continuing dialogue between the broader reading public and the otherwise static text. These are just examples of “slow conversation” if that makes sense.

    1. This intangible nar-rating presence need not be thought of as a person, but rather as an agency, that which chooses, orders, presents, and thus tells the narrative before us.

      Another important thing to think about when looking at television as a whole. It brings to mind the need to be critical when taking in. This line here shows that there is not always a person but a larger agency calling the shots. They are who is in charge of what we are seeing, hearing. Therefore, it can be implied that our thoughts regarding what we see may not inherently be our own but thoughts constructed for us. Quite scary when you look at it in those terms.

    Annotators

    1. how do we get students to move beyond civil attention to true engagement in the classroom?

      Understand that not every student is the same. These examples are for more introverted students while the ones who are extroverts, or even both, may not want to engage as much. Some people do learn better on their own, it just comes down to knowing the students well and how they think.

    1. writeandanalyzeavarietyoftypesof

      I love analyzation, but I think younger students may be scared away by words like "rhetorical knowledge." We have to teach them that it is not as scary as it sounds.

    1. How do we define a composing practice that is in-terlaced and interwoven with email, text-messaging, and web-browsing?

      We have to meet kids where they are. I really think we should incorporate more social media writing. For instance, there may be good reason to want to speak eloquently online. Just because the writing may be done on sites such as Facebook or Twitter doesn't change the fact that it is still writing. And it's the mode students are using most often and being most impacted by. Students are debating and learning in these places. I think that realistic writing activities could be put together on the premise of a social media status update or response to one.

  3. Aug 2019
    1. Husmann thinks the students had fallen into certain study habits, which, once formed, were too hard to break. Students seemed to be interested in their learning styles, but not enough to actually change their studying behavior based on them. And even if they had, it wouldn’t have mattered.

      This appeals to me because I think as a whole their is much research showing on more effective ways to study, and there is still more research being done, however what confuses me, and this article also connects to it is that as students and learners we are already accustomed and indoctronated more so out of habit the way we study, the way we take notes, knowing subconsciously that it may not be the most helpful for us. I can personally relate to trying, and wanting to make study groups with my friends but we all learn differently, and sometimes although can seem like a good idea, it is not always for the benefit of all of us since we may all learn differently. However, I think what the author is ultimately trying to get to is saying as a whole we must change the social norm of studying and how we learn, in order to normalize other study habits, and develop other behaviors of learning.

    1. Be it further enacted, that every civil officer shall, and every person may, arrest and carry back to his or her legal employer any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto who shall have quit the service of his or her employer before the expiration of his or her term of service without good cause, and said officer and person shall be entitled to receive for arresting and carrying back every deserting employee aforesaid the sum of $5, and 10 cents per mile from the place of arrest to the place of delivery, and the same shall be paid by the employer, and held as a setoff for so much against the wages of said deserting employee: Provided, that said arrested party, after being so returned, may appeal to a justice of the peace or member of the board of police of the county, who, on notice to the alleged employer, shall try summarily whether said appellant is legally employed by the alleged employer and his good cause to quit said employer; either party shall have the right of appeal to the county court, pending which the alleged deserter shall be remanded to the alleged employer or otherwise disposed of as shall be right and just, and the decision of the county court shall be final.

      When reading about most of the laws written during this time it makes me think did most of the freedmen understand what this meant when it was first passed. Or were they just told that they were about giving them the right to own things. To me its like the saying "Polishing a turd" its still a well you know. This section 7 in particular, this is slavery, you can not leave and if you do you will be dragged back, oh what there is more and we are going to make you pay for the inconvenience you caused. The statement about "without good cause" is one of those subjective statements, once again the fate of these men and women are in the hands of the people who enslaved them. I highly doubt that their idea of "without good cause" would be fair and just in any way shape of form.

  4. professordanongrades.files.wordpress.com professordanongrades.files.wordpress.com
    1. facts toward insight or complex ideas rarely take place” in many classrooms.By the same token, if we’re still using tests (Kohn, 2015) rather than authentic assessments of theirunderstanding, we’re giving them a gift of meaningful questions with one hand only to take it awaywith the other (by evaluating them on the number of facts they’ve crammed into short-termmemory).Deep questions help kids to stay curious, grow increasingly resourceful at figuring things out, andbecome active meaning makers. To structure learning around such questions is to take the first steptoward creating an environment that is not merely academic but genuinely intellectual.2. WHOSE QUESTIONS?It makes good sense to create thoughtful questions for students, but it’s even more important toelicit their questions — a possibility missing from many resources on the subject. Teaching, likeparenting and managing, is greatly improved by following a four-word admonition: Talk less, askmore. And better than asking subject-matter questions is the process of encouraging kids to come upwith the questions that matter to them. If this is more the exception than the rule in our classrooms,it may be because it requires us to give up some control.There is a purely practical justification for asking students what they’re curious about: Even amarvelously gifted teacher can’t always figure out the right question to ask a given student at justthe right time, as Duckworth (1987, p. 5) pointed out. Thus, she added, it’s fortunate that “childrencan raise the right question for themselves if the setting is right.” As a result, “they are moved to taxthemselves to the fullest to find an answer.” By inviting their questions, we unleash the power ofintrinsic motivation because all of us tend to develop more enthusiasm for, and ultimately becomemore skillful at, pursuing questions about which we’re genuinely curious than those handed to us bysomeone else.This may explain the National Research Council’s (1996, p. 31) declaration that “inquiry intoauthentic questions generated from student experiences is the central strategy for teachingscience.” (By “is,” we can assume they meant “should be.”) And their conclusion is by no meanslimited to science.In more traditional classrooms, students are rarely asked what they’ve been wondering abou

      Now a days students are thinking based on what the teachers want them to think.

    1. Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy: A problem-focused intervention that seeks to teach chil-dren who manifest socioemotional challengesand maladaptive behaviors to become theirown therapist.

      I think these EBI's can be very helpful based on the disproportionality (demographic groups) we see in the special education classrooms. Specifically the cognitive-behavior therapy intervention helps with controlling emotions and behaviors. I know in the classroom as a teacher you want to focus on teaching them but emotions may sometimes get in the way of a student succeeding in a lesson. For the child going through this intervention, they will be more successful academically by being able to overcome their emotions when dealing with a difficult lesson.

    Annotators

    1. that will empower you to advocate for yourself, make smart choices for your own learning, and get the most out of your experience at SF State and the culture we collectively create here.

      This class and what we gain from it can be much more than what we may think as we'll be able to input what we learn from it into our personal lives and even the world around us.

  5. www.kurtstuke.com www.kurtstuke.com
    1. After completing the SDU, the character I most aligned with was Aristotle. My moral purposes most aligned with virtue, followed by duty, with no alignment in utility (fitting, since I never cared for the Utilitarian writings of Mill). I do agree with the findings of the SDU. The strengths listed in Virtue (the moral purpose I most align with) included, “going far beyond compliance, giving 100%, and being a trustworthy person and have been in a leadership role” (SDU, Virtue description, 2019). I do believe these descriptors lend themselves to my experience in leadership thus far. A weakness that stood out to me in the Virtue description was “you may find it frustrating that everyone is not a moral perfectionist” (SDU, Virtue description, 2019). I will be the first to say that I am not a moral perfectionist, but I do try to weigh the best options in decisions, especially those affecting other people.

      In the Duty description, the strengths were, “being a natural team player, devising rules and sticking to them, and being the definition of trustworthy and dependable” (SDU, Duty description, 2019). Again, these strengths do speak to by experience as a leader thus far. My wife will be the first to say that I am rules follower through and through. One weakness that was accurate was, “you may take it personally when others are not fair” (SDU, Duty description, 2019). I think this sentence makes me sound a bit childish but I agree with the premise that rules and guidelines are created for a reason, therefore it is understood that everyone should rightfully follow them to ensure equality. Now I am not naïve; I know that most people bend rules (as do I), but I think the idea of clarity and fairness is and essential one.

      In the article titled “First Know Yourself Then Your Team” by Manfred Kets de Vries, the author dives into what he titles as the “Psychodynamic approach” (para. 5). Basically, the author explains that “we are all complex, unique and often paradoxical beings. Our everyday lives consist of webs of constantly shifting and irrational forces that underlie ‘rational behavior and choices” (para. 5). Knowing this parable to be mostly true, I tend to leverage my moral purposes of virtue and duty to combat these external and irrational forces. Being virtuous, as described by the SDU, allows to be a trustworthy person, one that others can come to when those irrational forces try to take shape. Duty allows me to seamlessly fit into the grooves of rules and guidelines in order to avoid the distractions of the irrational forces, while once again being a trustworthy and dependable person for others on my team.

      References: Kets de Vries, Manfred (19 August, 2014). First Know Yourself Then Your Team, Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/insead/2014/08/19/first-know-yourself-then-your-team/#7745c99f5144

    1. does not exist in this province.

      As author/journalist Joan Baxter, who spent many years living and working in West Africa, told The Nova Scotia Advocate recently:

      "I’ve...written so many cheques for Freedom of Information requests, and I have so many that are under appeal. That’s been the biggest shock to me, how little access we have to information. I’ve been really railing against it, as you may have noticed, in recent articles, because it’s something Canadians should be very upset about."

    1. Express.co.uk

      Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

      Hit #1 (score of 34.0)

      Hit #2 (score of 32.9)

      Hit #3 (score of 32.3)

      Hit #4 (score of 32.0)

      Hit #5 (score of 31.0)

      I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

    1. The question posed at the beginning of this paragraph is a good place to begin.

      It may be helpful to reiterate or rephrase "the question posed at the beginning of this paragraph." Perhaps we can add a sentence like:

      "Think about the reasons for selecting a qualitative approach, as well as your ultimate purpose for conducting your research."

    1. We are usually relatively unfamiliar with our participants, at least on a personal level. This can make sitting down for an interview where we might be asking some deep questions a bit awkward and uncomfortable, at least at first. Because of this, we want to craft our questions in such a way that they are not off-putting, inadvertently accusatory or judgmental, or culturally insensitive.  To accomplish this we want to make sure we phrase questions in a neutral tone (e.g. “Tell me what that was like”, as opposed to, “That sounds horrible, what was that like”). To accomplish this we can shift perspectives and think about what it would be like for us to be asked these questions (especially by a stranger), and we can pilot test our questions to see how they ‘feel’ to others. Also, if we are conducting interviews on topics that may be particularly hard for people to talk about, we likely will want to start out with some questions that are easier to address prior to getting into the heavier topics. Make them relatable Unlike surveys, where researchers may not be able to explain the meaning of question, when conducting interviews, we are present to help further explain questions if there is some confusion. However, ideally our questions are as clear as possible from the beginning. This means that we avoid jargon or technical terms, we anticipate areas that might be hard to explain and try to provide some examples or a metaphor that might help to get the point across, and we do our homework to relay our questions in a cultural context that is appropriate. Like the discussion above, pilot testing our questions can be very helpful for ensuring the relatability of our questions, especially with community representatives. What sounds good in our heads as a question, might make little sense to our intended audience. Make them individually distinct, but collectively comprehensive Just like when we are developing survey questions, you don’t want to ask more than one question at the same time. This is confusing and hard to respond to for the participant, so make sure you are only asking about one idea in each question.  However, when you are thinking about your list of questions, or your whole interview guide collectively, ensure that you have comprehensively included all the ideas related to your topic. It’s extremely disheartening as a qualitative researcher that has concluded their interviews and realized there was a really important area that you failed to include in your guide. To avoid this, make sure to know the literature in your area well and talk to other people who study this area to get there perspective on what topics need to be included.

      This table is a great review resource for student readers. However, perhaps the text can be formatted differently or broken up to facilitate quick review. Can we organize important points as bullet points rather than complete sentences? This may make for easier reader review.

    2. you may choose to meet at your office

      I remember reading in my Group Practice MSW class text that office settings may involve inherent power imbalances, and that the physical office layout can emphasize or de-emphasize such imbalances. Because this and other chapters remind students to think about power dynamics of researcher-participant interactions, perhaps we can add something about striving toward power-balanced physical office layouts if and when interviews are conducted in office settings. (As an example: The actions required to ease power imbalances in this environment are relatively straightforward: Instead of a researcher sitting behind a desk and having the participant sit opposite in a different sized/styled chair, arrange the chairs across from each other, with no person behind a desk.)

    3. It is a resource that participants own that they choose to share with us.

      Again - interesting and helpful way to conceptualize intellectual ownership and sharing. To emphasize and clearly illustrate this point, perhaps we can include a brief example, which might read something like this:

      "It is a resource that participants own that they choose to share with us. Think about it: When a smart phone app or computer program wants your personal data, you're usually asked to read a privacy statement and agree to certain terms. Companies are legally required to notify you about their intentions to use the data you may share. And many companies certainly recognize that your data is a valuable resource. As researchers, we have similar responsibilities."

    4. As we are thinking about going out in the world to gather data, I think it can be helpful to think about the data that is shared with us a resource.

      Great point about conceptualizing shared data as a resource. This is an important and helpful way for researchers to think about the information they get from participants. However - the repetitive use of the word "think" in this sentence threw me off a bit. Perhaps revise to something like:

      "As we're thinking about going out into the world to gather data, it may be helpful to conceptualize the data that is shared with us as a resource."

    1. Emergent design is the idea that some decision in our design will be dynamic and change as our understanding of the research question evolves as we go through the research process.

      May want to revise this sentence a bit for clarity. Perhaps revise to something like:

      "Emergent design is the idea that our initial research design is dynamic, and may change as we go through the research process and our understanding of the research question evolves."

      (I think what threw me off a bit was the phrase "...some decision in our design" - this is the main part I would suggest tweaking for clarity.)

    2. The researcher who schedules interviews with public assistance recipients to capture their experience after a legislation drastically changes their requirements for receiving benefits relies on the verbal data shared with them.

      I think this important point could perhaps be more clearly explained/worded. I think that if we separately identify the researcher's topic of interest and research approach, we'll bring some added clarity to this hypothetical scenario. Here's how I might revise this sentence to clarify core concepts and explain links between ideas:

      "Let's say, for example, that a researcher wants to learn about the experiences of public assistance recipients after federal legislation drastically changes the requirements for receiving benefits. This researcher might schedule interviews to capture verbal data shared by participants. The researcher relies on the data he or she may capture as participants talk about their personal stories, experiences, and reactions to the federal legislation."

      *The above revision suggestion references the "personal stories" of participants - which could be a good way to naturally reiterate this chapter's earlier points about qualitative research focusing in part on the stories of research subjects.

    3. As such, as you go about recruiting for your qualitative studies, remember that people are made of multiple stories, of intersectional identities.

      (I have not perused every chapter, so please take this comment with a grain of salt - I recognize that perhaps additional material is elsewhere included in the text)

      This part of the paragraph about intersectionality lacks context and clarity, I think, because there aren't concrete links between fairly abstract ideas and real-world examples. Perhaps we can add a Student Example box here that gives a couple/few examples of how researchers or students may encounter issues of intersectionality in the field/in their work)

    4. Because of this, I think we need to take special care to treat these stories as sacred and we go about asking for people to share them, we need to do so humbly.

      May want to break this sentence into 2 separate statements to emphasize this important point. Could perhaps revise to something like "Because of this, we need to take special care to treat these stories as sacred. As we go about asking for people to share their stories, we need to do so humbly."

    5. assure there is fair distribution of risks and benefits related to our research, be conscientious in our recruitment efforts to support equitable representation, and that we ensure special protections to vulnerable groups involved in research activities. As you plan your qualitative research study sampling plan, make sure to consider who is invited and able to participate and who is not.

      While this is certainly useful information, I think the sentence/paragraph structure may be a bit too dense to allow for adequate reader concept absorption. Is there a way to break down these 3 concepts into a more reader-friendly bulleted or numbered list? For example, instead of the current format/structure, we might present these topics in the following way:

      "Within this context, we need to:

      (1) Assure there is a fair distribution of risks and benefits related to our research;

      (2) Be conscientious in our recruitment efforts to support equitable representation; and

      (3) Ensure special protections for vulnerable groups involved in research activities."

      Then, perhaps we could begin a new paragraph with the sentence "As you plan your qualitative research study sampling method, make sure to consider..."

      I think the above might be helpful for readers who are better able to absorb content in smaller, more visually bite-sized chunks. Anyway, just a thought!

    6. [2.20]

      just an observation - we may want to round the estimated reading times to the nearest half-minute. I think there's some potential for confusion among readers interpreting an estimated reading time such as "6.57" - this estimate is so specific that it might not seem at first glance like an estimated reading time. Rounding that number and changing the format - i,e., "6.57" [current] to "7 mins" [suggested] - might help students clearly understand what we are trying to communicate. I do think the estimated reading times are potentially very helpful for readers, though.

    1. Section 2 then begins the real ball game, namely everyone has the following fundamental freedom. The one difficulty we had, as a committee, is with Section 2(b). What do we do with freedom of thought when you have got legislation dealing with have propaganda? How far is it possible to retain such articles as Section 281(1) of the Criminal Code and Section 281(2)? Moreover, you will see we have quoted from Article 20 of the United National Covenant of Civil and Political Rights where propaganda of this kind is regarded as inconsistent with freedom of speech. [Page 87] So we raised the question which seemed to me to be necessary to raise with you, that caution must be exercised, we hope, by the courts in due course, or by you, as draftsmen on how far you are prepared to push the concept of free speech consistent with our experience of hate propaganda. One suggestion we make here-and I do not wish to do anything more than to drop it as a hint, but you may want to have some language that some of the modern constitutions have, which state very starkly and flatly that the advocacy of genocide or group libel is forbidden. But I had the honour to be the chairman of the special committee on hate propaganda in 1965. At that time we came to the flat conclusion that the advocacy of group hatred and genocide was totally inconsistent with the democratic process and no democratic state could tolerate it. Now, whether you want to put that flatly in a constitution is for you to consider; but I think it is for us to bring it to your attention, because it is of importance.

      §[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 132.

    1. Is Eugenics Happening Today? As research continues to uncover new disease-causing mutations, it becomes increasingly possible to stop the transmission of certain heritable diseases.  In the long term, this may lead to complete eradication of diseases like Down Syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and hemophilia. However, some wonder if modern day attempts to eradicate hereditary disorders equate to eugenics. One complication of genetic testing for the purpose of disease eradication is that, in practice, a particular ethnic group will likely be involved due to shared ancestry.  For instance, Tay-Sachs disease is significantly more common in certain Jewish communities.  Tay-Sachs is a genetic disease that causes a deterioration of mental and physical abilities and results in death by age four. Eradicating Tay-Sachs will require screening all individuals in the affected population. However, a public campaign to test all individuals of Jewish descent for Tay-Sachs carrier status may for some recall the racist motivations of eugenicists in the early 20th century, particularly those associated with Nazi Germany. Also, racial stereotypes or biases may be reinforced if genetic testing performed on individuals of an ethnic group reveals a predisposition to a particular disease or condition. Using modern genetic technology, prospective parents can be prescreened to determine their carrier status for certain diseases. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis following in vitro fertilization allows parents to select embryos that are free of disease. Additionally, prenatal genetic testing can provide a lot of information to parents about their unborn child.  These technologies make more informed decision-making possible, but some are concerned about a shift in the way we view family and parenting.  Parents who want to have a child without pursuing genetic testing may feel guilty if the child is born with any health problems. Additionally, some are concerned about what an overemphasis on eliminating disabilities in unborn children will mean for people who already have the disability. The most significant difference between modern genetic technologies, that some view as eugenic, and the historical use of eugenics is consent.  Today, individuals pursue genetic testing by choice.  An individual can never be forced into testing or be required to take action, such as sterilization, based on the results of a genetic test.  Individuals differ in their views on genetic testing in relation to reproductive decision-making and possible eugenic motivations, but at least today parents have the choice to use the technology or not.

      This source was important as it answered my last FQ question of to what extent has eugenics made an impact on today's society. this is an article made by the know genetics website and the website contains information of genetic and biology information this website is created by pre-health students and their professors to share their knowledge into the health communities,as this source contains information on how eugenics has "evolved" into modern day and how with proper science and technology society can use eugenics but in a much civilized way. I think this source is reliable as it's written by either a pretty knowledge student or a professor.

  6. Jul 2019
    1. I want to refer you to Section 2 of the resolution which is a Section on fundamental freedoms. It says: Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion, (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion expression, including freedom of the press and other media of information What I want to ask you is, how do you think the word “everyone” would be interpreted as it pertains to everyone has the following freedoms, the freedom of the press, freedom of other media of information. I want to take you back in this country about four of five years when the government across the way introduced legislation, which I supported, concerning Time magazine and Reader’s Digest, to try and Canadianize the magazine industry in this country. I am wondering whether or not if we were to enshrine Section 2 in the constitution as written, Time magazine or Reader’s Digest could have gone to the courts and said: “We have a consitutional right in this country of freedom of expression and freedom of the press and freedom of information, freedom of the media; therefore, the government of Canada [Page 12] and the Parliament of Canada do not have the right to legislate restrictively against our two organizations.” Could it be interpreted in that way? Ms. Crandall: Mr. Nystrom, I think that is the kind of question which an expert should be asked to answer. This is what we are saying now, We have not had an opportunity to look at all sides of these questions to give you any kind of an answer. Again, I am not trying to be difficult. But that is one of the questions which we would like to ask someone who is knowledgeable. Mr. Nystrom: I appreciate the answer. The reason why I ask the question is that the words “everyone” and “citizens of Canada” are used throughout the resolution. I am not a lawyer myself, but it would seem to imply that these could be given a fairly wide interpretation, and I am concerned that we might have in a constitution something that is restrictive where we could not increase Canadian content. Let me ask you the same question again about the electronic media. There is growing concern that we Canadianize radio, television—and the CRTC is concerned about this, about television programs coming in from the United States. There is talk now about a second CBC network in this country. Again, I want to ask you a similar question pertaining to the electronic media. If everybody has the freedom of expression and freedom of the press and other media of information, in your opinion, or perhaps in the opinion of your colleague, do you think we would be able to do this as a Parliament, where the constitution says we are denying a fundamental right to everyone, perhaps NBC, New York, or ABC somewhere in the United States? Ms. Hardy: I think, Mr. Nystrom, that it is very important. I have served abroad for Canada in the Department of External Affairs, in the public affairs field, and I feel that it is very important that we develop a Canadian culture, that we develop an interest in things Canadian and a pride, and I grant that there are very good programs produced by the electronic media of other countries but I think we should be proud of our own heritage and be proud of what we can do. I have just been at a briefing on plans for CBC 2, Tele Deux, and I am very pleased that this is what may be coming along shortly and I would hope that we would not refuse all foreign media offers to assist us in our cultural development, but I think we should certainly give ourselves the chance to be first in the field and to welcome the opportunity and the pride in our own country and in what we can develop ourselves. This is a continuing subject of interest financially as well as culturally, naturally, and I would hope that the media club, which now covers the electronic media representatives as well as the press, would be in the forefront of assisting in developments if possible. Thank you. [Page 13] Mr. Nystrom: I wonder if you could possibly, if you have time to do a written brief to the Committee, to try and seek some advice on those questions, because I agree fully with you that we have to develop a Canadian culture and of course we need some input from other countries around the world because we are part of the global village, we have to have a Canadian identity and it is very important, and I would be very concerned if the way Section 2 is written that perhaps we could be denied through our constitution the right to develop fully the Canadian culture and pehaps you could look at that. I also wanted to ask your interpretation of a couple of other words in Section 2. I wanted to ask you what you think the interpretation in your opinion would be of other media of information. We have singled out here freedom of belief, opinion, expression, including the freedom of the press. I know what the press is, I think, but what would be the interpretation legally, in your opinion, of other media of information, what would that include? Ms. Hardy: I would expect that that would include the electronic journalism. The press is usually referred to as print media. Media is a very broad term that has had to be used because you cannot just refer to the press now because it covers a number of other representatives who inform, through one source or another, and I think the electronic media has an important place now in our culture because communications in this country is an aspect of helping unify the country, I think, by letting us get to know each other, not only through print but through electronic means.

      §[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 128-130.

    1. and the more pseudonymity is available

      Technology is a double-edged sword in that it may advance civilizations, yet it's just a conduit to amplify what people already feel. The internet so dangerous because it can normalize racism in ways we don't even think of.

    1. Yet the body intervenes constantly, whether one is ill or not. It is the mode of intervention that conditions how well, or unwell, we feel. A state of wellbeing is one in which we do not need to think about our embodied organism in any way other than the sensorial pleasures it affords, where we are immersed within our environment, engaged in an activity, involved with others. But one of physical or emotional pain affects the very foundation on which the sense of self we otherwise take for granted rests: what we feel ourselves to be can be upended. When this happens, we may realise that what we feel ourselves to be is in fact constructed. How we exist as embodied selves is a highly complex business involving the brain and body engaged in constant interaction.

      Understanding ourselves through upending moments of intervention. I wonder about this with experiences on the web. How aware am I of my own being when I clack on this keyboard? What kind of self do I build when I am here?

      When I am away from the web there is a different sense of self. A contrast of being. What of that? Can the contrast ever be rectified? Can I make them more harmonious? Or is it an impenetrable gap - one nobody can breach?

    1. How will this class, with its focus on biological organic chemistry, be different from a class in biochemistry? You should not make the mistake of thinking that a course built around biological examples is going to be more biochemistry than organic chemistry. Although there will inevitably be some overlap with the biochemistry course you may take later in your career (just as there is overlap between courses in general chemistry and organic chemistry, between physical chemistry and physics, etc.), this is very much an organic chemistry text – it follows essentially the same outline and covers essentially the same topics as most other organic chemistry texts, and is fundamentally distinct from most biochemistry texts. In organic chemistry, we think about individual chemical reactions at the atomic level – concentrating on the 'how and why' details of what is happening with the organic molecule(s) in question. In a biochemistry course, you will see many of the same compounds and reactions that you saw in this text. In biochemistry, however, you will see them mainly from the perspective of complete biochemical pathways: you will spend much of your time studying how these pathways are interconnected and regulated. Biochemistry, then, is a 'bigger picture' course where we study the forest, while in organic chemistry we study the trees.

      This is immensely helpful for self-learners. Thanks!

    1. Our greatest danger is that in the great leap from slavery to freedom we may overlook the fact that the masses of us are to live by the productions of our hands, and fail to keep in mind that we shall prosper in proportion as we learn to dignify and glorify common labour, and put brains and skill into the common occupations of life;

      I agree with my classmates that this is an important piece of the article. I think that is their way of saying that they deserve the freedom, and will not take it for granted. They have worked hard in the past for their country, but the hard work is not stopping for them. I feel they are asking for more opportunities to better themselves to make a better fit as citizens. Would yall agree with this as well?

    1. This triple paradox in Mr. Washington's position is the object of criticism by two classes of colored Americans. One class is spiritually descended from Toussaint the Savior, through Gabriel, Vesey, and Turner, and they represent the attitude of revolt and revenge; they hate the white South blindly and distrust the white race generally, and so far as they agree on definite action, think that the Negro's only hope lies in emigration beyond the borders of the United States. And yet, by the irony of fate, nothing has more effectually made this programme seem hopeless than the recent course of the United States toward weaker and darker peoples in the West Indies, Hawaii, and the Philippines,—for where in the world may we go and be safe from lying and brute force?

      I think what this means is that even though black people would like to leave U.S they will be subject of persecution because U.S is conquering other countries like Hawaii and the Philippines.

    1. reets; for if we take the ages into our account, may there not be a civilization going on among brutes as well as men? They seemed to me to be rudimental, burrowing men, still standing on their defence, awaiting their transformation.

      Thoreau uses personification here again, and he talks about the history of human evolution. Thoreau saw beasts as creatures with their own histories and civilizations. They just like humans, waiting to evolve. I think it also shows Thoreau's respect for animal life. In his eyes, humans and animals are equal.

    1. I wonder, though, why it was thought that the appropriate location for a limitations clause was right at the very beginning of the proposed Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, and whether you would be prepared to look at the possibility of moving the limitations clause in whatever form we may finally end up with—and naturally, there may be complications, because if there is a preamble in it it would be inappropriate to do this; but if there is no preamble, on the proposed Clause 1, moving the limitations clause to the end of the proposed Charter? In other words, I believe it would be important symbolically, if nothing else, to start out with the list of fundamental freedoms, the mobility rights and a positive statement of what the rights are, and then at the conclusion of the proposed Charter to indicate what limitations might exist on those [Page 26] rights, rather than starting out with limitations and then a statement of rights. Mr. Kaplan: Well, before directly answering the question, I would like to understand that you are suggesting that the difference is symbolic, and that it does not make any real difference. Mr. Robinson: Certainly, I would not argue that there was any difference in substance in the way this will be interpreted, and I am sure your advisers could confirm that. Mr. Kaplan: I do not think there any real difference either. I think it is purely a matter of style. Our view of the matter was that it was more realistic and useful to the reader to see at once that the rights were not absolute, but that they were constrained. That would be made immediately clear to a person consulting the statute without having to read the first 30 sections to find that what was contained in the proposed Clause 1 was 0really not the whole story. It seems to be more honest. Mr. Robinson: Mr. Minister, if it is agreed that there is no difference in substance—and we are talking about a document, a Charter of Rights which, hopefully, would be widely distributed to school children, to Canadians right across the country, and I would suggest there is a certain symbolic value in setting out those rights and then at the conclusion of those rights indicating what the limitations, if any, may exist in respect of them, as is done in the Diefenbaker Bill of Rights, where the rights were enumerated and at the conclusion of the Bill of Rights, there are references, for example to the War Measures Act and to other limiting provisions.

      §1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 108-109..

    1. Mr. Roger Tassé, (Q.C., Deputy Minister, Department of Justice): I think that is an important question you have raised, Mr. Fraser. In effect when you look at the meaning of law, it may mean a number of things and in this context it could mean an Act of Parliament, for example, and we did not want it to be restricted to an Act of Parliament for some of the reasons that have been expressed, and also for another reason that has not been mentioned so far, and that is in effect we wanted also to cover rules of the common law. For example, in the area of libel, defamation. And in many provinces this has not been clarified. There are rules that have just been expressed over time by the courts and we did not want to upset all of this legislation so that is why in effect in French we have used an expression that would embody as well rules of common law that have been established by courts and it could be in the civil law field or in the common law, most probably in the common law, but also would include the statute and include a regulation enacted under an appropriately passed or enacted legislation. Mr. Fraser: So what you are saying, then, is that … Mr. Tassé: Perhaps if I may just expand on what I have just said. For example, if you look at the freedom of expression, the law of defamation, the law of libel imposes some limits on that so we wanted these to continue to have application and we think that they would fit in effect the tests that are set out in Section 1. Mr. Fraser: Well, then, by the same token, so does the law of master and servant, the law of contract and the law of partnership, and a number of other common law notions. [Page 50] Could you foresee a situation where, on the basis of the rights set out in here, you could have a conflict between what are considered laws which stem from the body of case law that has come down over the centuries which could be in conflict with the right that has been set out in the Charter? Mr. Tassé: Well, Mr. Fraser, we do not see these rights or these prescriptions of the Charter to have application in terms of a relationship between individuals. We see them as applying in terms of a relationship between the state and individuals, so I am not sure that in terms of contract laws, unless we were looking at the situation where in fact we are talking of contracts passed between the state, the government, and that might offend a constitutional limitation on some of these rights, then the Charter might be called upon for assistance but if we are just looking at in effect relationships, contractural relationships between individuals, I do not see how the Charter itself could be called upon to assist in resolution of conflicts that may arise. Mr. Fraser: Well, I do not want to take this too far into the realm of theory but individual contracts are constantly formed as a result of discrimination between certain options and certain individuals, and that has always been, within some limitations, an accepted freedom to enter into contract unless there is a specific piece of legislation which forbids it. You can take, for instance, the codes in some of the provinces which now constrain absolute freedom of contract in hiring policies. But I take it that what you are saying is that in the English version when you say “prescribed by law”, that is not just statute law, but is also the common law? Mr. Tassé: Yes. Mr. Fraser: As decided by the cases? Mr. Tassé: Yes. Mr. Fraser: But they could still be challenged if somebody could take the issue to a court and say that that law can no longer be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society? Mr. Tassé: That is correct. Mr. Fraser: Thank you.

      §1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 107-108.

    1. Mr. Irwin: Is that not the whole raison d’être of this discussion, how much power are we as legislators going to give up by way of entrenched rights to the courts, to not be touched forever. The Joint Chairman (Mr. Joyal): Mr. Tarnopolsky. [Page 27] Professor Tarnopolsky: Mr. Chairman, if I may answer that. I think our position is that you should either fish or cut bait. If you are going to have a bill of rights, make it a bill of rights which cannot be just over-ridden any time that a court is convinced, which we are suggesting would be relatively easy, that the limits are those which are generally acceptable. It would not just be in legislation, because, again, if I could use the Hogan case, I think that it would not be very difficult to convince a court that the practice of the police, namely, how can a lawyer help the chap, let him take the breathalizer, it is probably generally accepted, So that I think the fear of those of our members who support a bill of rights would be that it would be disillusioning, that it would be disappointing for the populace to think that they have a bill of rights which really over-rode inconsistent legislative administrative action to find out it is not. We think that rather than promoting that kind of cynicism, the Parliament should face up to either creating a bill of rights which over-rides or stay with the one which we now have, which we have got some jurisprudence on and there are more cases than just a Drybones case which have been applied with some effect.

      §1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 91.

    1. Mr. Fairweather, what I would like to do from looking at materials that you have provided earlier, is take you to your concern of Section I of the proposed resolution. At the bottom of your presentation as well as in the accompanying documents you stress your concern about Section l. I would like to ask you from your perspective if the clause remains essentially in the form it now appears what are the technical consequences of that clause in relation to the protection of rights and freedoms? Mr. Fairweather: They are so serious that I could not imagine this Committee letting Section l go unamended, That section as drafted would challenge, in my opinion, the rest of the charter, and I suspect somebody is going to be getting an amendment. It is, as I said, turning our backs on the international and national jurisprudence, and it is very broadly drafted. Why we do not use the language that is well accepted now and has been ratified by Canada, for the life of me I have no idea. This is a strong statement but I have strong feelings. I am absolutely committed to the entrenchment and the patriation and the goals. They are wonderful goals for this country at last but why not go for something better. Mr. Epp: From your experience as a Commissioner of the Human Rights Commission, could you give us examples of if this proposed resolution had in fact been in effect with the prohibitions in Section 1, can you give us some specific examples of the restrictions it would have given or caused both to rights and freedoms and also to the Commission? Mr. Fairweather: Yes. One was given last night, if I know correctly, by the Minister of Justice for Canada. It might be that generally accepted standards in this country for mandatory retirement, the anti-discrimination part having to do with age, could be challenged and rendered meaningless as a reform mechanism, because the generally accepted standards now are quite illiberal, if I may use that word in this place. [Page 12] The generally accepted standards for Canada are to push people out at certain ages, I greeted this charter with excitement when I saw that the Government of Canada had included age, but when I see the language of Section 1, I wonder. Another message that surely cannot be forgotten is that the generally accepted standards in Canada in 1940 and 1941 were to take Canadians whose offence was that they were of Japanese origin. In the Wellington Street Archives last night while you were doing something else I went to the festival of the 100th anniversary of the Chinese in Canada. They came to build the railway and I am as shocked as I know senators and members are to remember that people who are enshrined and rightly, in our history were perpetrators of the Chinese Exclusion Act, the Chinese $50 a head tax act. The Chinese people in this country were not allowed to vote in a province I think until after the Second World War. It was Mr. Diefenbaker who gave the Native peoples the right to vote in the late 1950s. I am not saying that a government that follows this one would, but it could, because those were I guess until reform came the accepted standards. This document is to be entrenched, enshrined, as a statement to the people who have their loyalty to Canada. Mr. Epp: Do I understand you correctly, sir, that if the document before us were to be enshrined, entrenched, that an incident like Canadians of Japanese origin and the removal of these people from various parts of Canada, their prohibition of freedoms at that time, that in fact that kind of action would still be possible under the charter in its present form. Mr. Fairweather: I think, Mr. Epp, my duty is to warn you, and I have given some examples, age and these other offensive matters could be put in jeopardy. I am not saying they will but they could. I think most of this charter is really a superb piece of work, but I cannot see why Canada wants to turn its back on accepted international standards and language that has been adjudicated. That is why I am being a bit fussy. It clouds the rest of a noble document.

      §1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 89-90.

    1. in May, an Australian think tank called climate change "a near- to mid-term existential threat to human civilization."

      This had no scientific credibility. written by a couple of businessmen, with no scientific peer review.

      Michael Mann, respected climate scientist at Pennsylvannia State University, calls their report

      "overblown rhetoric, exaggeration, and unsupportable doomist framing":

      Richard Betts, Professor, Met Office Hadley Centre & University of Exeter, put it like this:

      The “report” is not a peer-reviewed scientific paper. It’s from some sort of “think tank” who can basically write what they like. The report itself misunderstands / misrepresents science, and does not provide traceable links to the science it is based on so it cannot easily be checked (although someone familiar with the literature can work it out, and hence see where the report’s conclusions are ramped-up from the original research).

      One of their central points was that they took an analysis of heat waves which lead to 1 in 10,000 to be at risk of dying if they do not take precautions such as the old and infants, and said it meant that

      "Thirty-five percent of the global land area, and 55 percent of the global population, are subject to more than 20 days a year of lethal heat conditions, beyond the threshold of human survivability,"

      The paper was calibrated to 30% of us facing "deadly heat" in 2000. We didn't get death of 30% of the world population in 2000. They totally misunderstood the paper.

      Another example, they read a figure of 1 billion people at risk of sea level rise of 20 meters, way beyond anything possible this century or centuries into the future, and said this was the number of people who would be climate migrants by 2050. With sea level rise you can stay where you are if you build sea walls and the rise at even the highest level with "business as usual" and worst case scenario is 2.5 meters.

      Many mistakes like this - they weren't scientists, were clearly not used to reading science papers, and can't have run it past anyone who understands climate science to check it.

      Climate Change Will NOT End Human Civilization By 2050, 'Overblown Rhetoric And Unsupportable Doomist Framing' Says Michael Mann

      https://www.science20.com/print/238557

    1. Response to SDM's question: I have certain students who like to get right to work. They seem intrinsically motivated to do the work. Sometimes they are quite interested and other times they aren't, but still have good motivation to finish the work. Perhaps they want to chat with friends or read on their own. I think their reasons may vary, but they always get to work right away and work until finished. If the work interests them, they will often ask for more work to complete - I usually have extra pages with different and more challenging work available. If it is not an area that really interests them, they will go on to read or do something else that is an option. I have some students who like to try and get other children to do their work for them. Like Brenna noticed, they display some learned helplessness. I work diligently to remind students to help their friends without giving them the answers. We also do growth mindset activities and have growth mindset discussions frequently to help students increase their intrinsic motivation. I frequently model how to help our friends without giving them the answer. We discuss how it will help our friends to help them work through something and really understand it as opposed to what happens if you just give them the answer. I also have students who finish quickly and then eagerly ask to help friends. They love to be peer teachers and help. I have had a few students who shut down when work is challenging. It took a lot of coaching and one on one work to help them learn how to persevere through challenging tasks. Reminding students that I don't expect their work to be perfect has helped. Setting up lessons where we work independently but then collaborate and edit our work has helped. When students realize that work can be ongoing and that it is a process they relax and are more able to keep at challenging tasks. Also just listening to how they are feeling helped. One little girl would just start to cry. When I would sit with her and ask her questions about how she felt and what was going on, she seemed to relax. We used breathing techniques, structured grouping and different work spaces to allow her some space and a bit more quiet. By the end of the year she was working independently on challenging tasks without shutting down. She needed to build her self-confidence. When her self-efficacy strengthened, she took off.

    1. We scream everywhere: "Look, look, look, look!"

      So if screaming and looking don't work...what happens when we attend to other more novel types of sensational experience? I think that's part of this year's dfmi premise. No? I also wonder here about the idea of audience. Our broader missive as academics may be to re-think our dedication to a more general audience rather than our propensity to talk amongst ourselves. This is not a new, or radical claim, of course, but if we want to resist the corporatization of our institutions (a system to which we are bound and co-create/constitute), we can start there. I don't mean this as a self-righteous move, but it may be that our survival as both academics and in a more 'gaian' sense may depend on it.

    1. “No you’re not. That’s not how the story goes.”“Well if you already know how the story goes, why do you need me to read it toyou?”

      This interaction between Louise and her daughter is particularly eye-opening because it is Ted Chiang's way of hypothesizing that humans as well can think in a simultaneous manner. This does not mean that all humans could develop knowledge of the future the same way that Louise does in the future. To me, this conversation was like a break in the story that made me take a step back and think about how humans are schooled into thinking sequentially. Chiang may be trying to suggest that humans could be taught to think in a simultaneous mode of awareness as opposed to a sequential one, since we are not born with a natural inclination to either method of thought.

    1. It must be by his death, and, for my part,    I know no personal cause to spurn at him,    But for the general. He would be crown’d:    How that might change his nature, there’s the question.    It is the bright day that brings forth the adder    And that craves wary walking. Crown him that,    And then, I grant, we put a sting in him    That at his will he may do danger with.    The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins    Remorse from power, and, to speak truth of Caesar,    I have not known when his affections sway’d    More than his reason. But ’tis a common proof    That lowliness is young ambition’s ladder,    Whereto the climber-upward turns his face;    But when he once attains the upmost round,    He then unto the ladder turns his back,    Looks in the clouds, scorning the base degrees    By which he did ascend. So Caesar may;    Then, lest he may, prevent. And, since the quarrel    Will bear no color for the thing he is,    Fashion it thus, that what he is, augmented,    Would run to these and these extremities;    And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg    Which hatch’d would as his kind grow mischievous,    And kill him in the shell.

      This is Brutus’ first soliloquy where he visualises killing Caesar. Brutus states, “It is the bright day that brings forth the adder” where the metaphorical imagery introduces the idea of Caesar’s successes making him a threat. He then uses the simile, “and therefore think him as a serpent’s egg” which creates an image of the snake, an allusion to Caesar, which emphasises how Caesar is a tyrant who is waiting to be hatched and how he is a potential threat to all of Rome. Brutus further emphasises Caesar’s overwhelming power through the use of metaphorical imagery, “he then unto the ladder turns his back” which indicates how Caesar rose to power and now ignores the needs of the people of Rome.

    1. While inter-racial councils have sprung up in the South, drawing on forward elements of both races, in the Northern cities manual laborers may brush elbows in their everyday work, but the community and business leaders have experienced no such interplay or far too little of it

      That is a key point that has happened in the past and still do, although some might think that the change with inter racial councils have changed a lot, the thruth in the matter is has not. Yes it is more common to see inter racial groups in people in low power in society yet people with more we dont see as much inter racial groups.

  7. Jun 2019
    1. Those who conscientiously attempt to keep abreast of current thought, even in restricted fields, by close and continuous reading might well shy away from an examination calculated to show how much of the previous month's efforts could be produced on call.

      Condensed overviews of topics that extract the essence of the ideas in papers will become increasingly important.

    2. There is a growing mountain of research. But there is increased evidence that we are being bogged down today as specialization extends.

      I forget where I read this but there's a good argument for why the best resources for learning in the future will be precise, condensed summaries extracting the key points of different specializations and ideas. To keep on top of a field, we only need the essence of the ideas present

    1. Guardian newspaper

      Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

      Hit #1 (score of 128.2)

      Hit #2 (score of 77.6)

      Hit #3 (score of 60.6)

      Hit #4 (score of 59.5)

      Hit #5 (score of 33.3)

      I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

    1. When it comes to forming identity relationships online from reading the article and from past experiences I do not think that they are meaningful. Relationships are not as green as everyone thinks that they are. Couples often times post their best pictures online which could make them seem happy with one another in reality they probably aren’t. I believe that Instagram couples may give out a false conception because they feel the need that they are in a relationship that they need to post happy pictures with one another. When it comes to if the relationship is genuine, the article talked about how people can meet online, flirt, and break up online. Nowadays when meeting online we just look at a picture of someone and decide if we are interested in them without even knowing anything about them, this eliminates getting to know them personal and genuinely getting to know them.

      I agree that online environments limit forming close relationships and forming intimacy. Reasons why that I think this is that how close can a person actually get to someone though the internet and actually form a bond vs meeting them in real life. People can get so caught up in the pictures people post just because they look good in them but do not look to the other sides of things like how do they look outside of their instagram and if the can even connection emotionally with them. Back in the day before cellphones people had to go up to people they wanted to take out on a date and sit down with them face to face and hold a conversation vs being behind a phone screen were people can give false information about themselves.

    1. Another important aspect – we track mousemove on document, not on ball. From the first sight it may seem that the mouse is always over the ball, and we can put mousemove on it. But as we remember, mousemove triggers often, but not for every pixel. So after swift move the cursor can jump from the ball somewhere in the middle of document (or even outside of the window). So we should listen on document to catch it.

      if not, some mouseMove events we think are triggered on the ball will actually be triggered on other elements - hence the need to track those events on document

    1. Pedagogy is not ideologically neutral.

      I think this is so important. According to Malaguzzi, schools that embrace the political nature of all decisions related to schooling reinforce “the value of a continuity between the world of children and the world of adults; and values that start the children on a first assimilation of sentiments of justice” (Malaguzzi, 2016a, p. 182). I think this holds particular gravity and complexity when considering the responsibility we hold as teacher educators to understand the political nature of the decisions we are making surrounding technology. What positions are we holding and reinforcing when we don't understand the technological landscape we expect in which we expect our students to engage? This is a big part of why I'm so excited for this digital pedagogy workshop! Malaguzzi, L. (2016a). 41.71 Speech to the conference 'La gestione sociale nella scuola dell'infanzia' [Social management in scuole dell'infanzia], Modena, May 1971. In P. Cagliari, M. Castagnetti, C. Giudici, C. Rinaldi, V. Vecchi, & P. Moss (Eds.), Loris Malaguzzi and the schools of Reggio Emilia: A selection of his writings and speeches, 1945-1993 (175-183). London: Routledge.

    1. But the Taurid swarm, a dense cluster within the Taurid meteoroid stream, and through which the Earth periodically passes, changes the odds significantly and gives a possible reason for the unlikely occurrence that a once per 1000-year event occurred just over a century ago. If the hypothesized might of the Taurid swarm is successfully proven, this also heightens the possibility of a cluster of large impacts over a short period of time.

      More about this hypothesis - it is due to Napier and Clube and is based on the idea that the Taurids are the result of a large comet 100 km in diameter that broke up ten to twenty thousand years ago. It is not at all proven and this will be a test of it.

      The paper says

      The June-August 2019 encounter of the TSC provides aunique opportunity to identify additional NEOs of theswarm, helping to either substantiate or refute the giant comet hypothesis of Clube & Napier (1984) and the Tau-rid Complex hypothesis of Asher (1992) and Asher (1992).Dedicated surveys will at the very least be able to placelimits on the NEO density near the swarm centre.

      This hypothesis proposes that a giant comet (of or-der one hundred kilometres – comparable to large KBOs) fragmented in the inner solar system of order 10-20 ka ago, producing a complex of dust and small bodies (including 2P/Encke and associated asteroids) still present today.

      It is a controversial hypothesis, dating back to Clube and Napier's books

      Clube and his colleagues argue that the Taurids’ range of orbits indicates they were all shed by a huge comet, originally 100 miles across or more, that entered the inner solar system some 20,000 years ago. The comet’s orbit took it inside that of Mercury, close to the sun. By 10,000 years ago it was desiccated and brittle, and since then big chunks have been breaking off each time it passes the sun. One of those chunks, Clube thinks, is a comet called Encke. But the core object itself may still be out there. We suspect that the source of the Taurids is in an orbit similar to Encke’s, going round the sun every 3.39 years, says Clube. We think we’re on the verge of finding it.

      ... It’s quite possible some of the June events fit in with a single object, but I think Victor may have turned it into a bit of a conspiracy theory, says Brian Marsden of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

      Astrophysicists Say The Taurids Meteor Shower Could Send Dangerous Rocks to Earth - Discovery June 9, 1992

      They never found that big source object. But the idea still continues.

      Although most astronomers are not convinced by Clube and Napier's hypothesis of the giant comet, there is a lot of interest in searching this Taurid stream for asteroids. In a previous paper, a search in the database for asteroids that could match the properties of their new sub branch of the southern branch of the Taurids. They found two of them, 2015 TX24 (1.40±0.51 km) and and 2005 UR.which is also hundreds of meters in diameter.

      Spurný, P., Borovička, J., Mucke, H. and Svoreň, J., 2017. Discovery of a new branch of the Taurid meteoroid stream as a real source of potentially hazardous bodies. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 605, p.A68.

    1. Increase Font Size Toggle Menu HomeReadBuySign in Search in book: Search Contents Special thanks to...DisclaimerTo the teacher...Dear students...Map of Places in the StoriesPDF Downloads and How to Buy Print Copy Getting Started with Reading Skills Critical ReadingAnnotating While You ReadCreating Discussion QuestionsLearning Vocabulary in ContextBuilding Vocabulary with Suffixes Unit 1: Why Study Greek Mythology? Article: Why Study Greek Mythology?Story: Part 1: The Creation StoryStory: Part 2: The War of the TitansStory: Part 3: The Olympian PantheonArticle: The Olympics: Then and NowArticle: LEGOS in SpaceArticle: Greek Influence in US World’s FairsArticle: American NeoclassicismUnit 1 Writing Task: Putting it All Together Unit 2: Hades and the Underworld Story: Hades and the UnderworldStory: Sisyphus and TantalusStory: Prometheus and PandoraArticle: Opening Pandora’s BoxArticle: Ethos, Pathos, and LogosUnit 2: Writing Task: Putting it All Together Unit 3: Adventure and The Hero’s Journey Story: The Trojan War Part 1: The Apple of DiscordStory: The Trojan War Part 2: Achilles and HectorThe Trojan War Part 3: The Wooden HorseArticle: Cassandra of Climate ChangeArticle: The Hero’s JourneyStory: Theseus and the MinotaurArticle: Procrustean PoliticsStory: The Adventures of HerculesStory: Cadmus and EuropaStory: Jason and the ArgonautsStory: Perseus and MedusaStory: The OdysseyArticle: Resisting the Internet’s GripUnit 3 Writing Task: Putting It All Together Unit 4: Hubris and Nemesis Story: Oedipus the KingArticle: My Son’s Oedipus ComplexStory: Daedalus and IcarusArticle: Businesses and the Icarus ParadoxStory: King Midas and the Golden TouchStory: PhaethonStory: BellerophonArticle: Human Chimeras Already ExistStory: ArachneArticle: Hubristic LeadersArticle: Disasters Due to HubrisUnit 4 Writing Task: Putting it All Together Unit 5: Love and Metamorphosis Story: Echo and NarcissusArticle: Selfies: Narcissism or Not?Story: Cupid and PsycheArticle: When Cupid’s Arrow StrikesStory: Pan and SyrinxStory: Halcyone and CeyxStory: The Story of IoStory: Pyramus and ThisbeStory: Venus and AdonisUnit 5 Writing Task: Putting it All Together Writing and Grammar Skills Appendix Writing Skills: Avoiding PlagiarismWriting Skills: Noun Clauses for Better SentencesGrammar Skills: Active and Passive VoiceGrammar Skills: Gerund and InfinitiveGrammar Skills: Participle Phrases Instructor's Guide Teacher Resources & Cool ToolsInstructor's GuidePresentation TopicsAdditional Journal Topics Additional Materials for Instructors and Students Unit 1 Additional MaterialsUnit 2 Additional MaterialsUnit 3 Additional MaterialsUnit 4 Additional MaterialsUnit 5 Additional MaterialsFun Extras for Students About the authorAbout the BookReferences It’s All Greek to Me! Buy Unit 3: Adventure and The Hero’s Journey Article: The Hero’s Journey Image by alan9187 on PIxabay, Before You Read Discuss the following questions with a classmate. What makes someone a hero? What do heroes do in movies? Why do people love stories about heroes? What are some stories you can think of that have a hero? Skim the next reading. What do you think is the author’s purpose of the text: to inform, entertain, or to persuade? How will that affect the way you take notes on the reading?   Vocabulary in Context This article has a lot of useful vocabulary for reading the rest of the chapter and for use in your next essay. Try to guess the vocabulary in bold. Chances are this kind of story has been told for millennia, and yet people still love them. Many stories that humans have loved throughout time have some interesting patterns, and that there’s a good reason why these kinds of stories strike a chord in us. Superhero movies epitomize the hero’s journey and are becoming bigger and bigger blockbusters each year. Even George Lucas himself, the creator of the groundbreaking Star Wars movie series, noted that Joseph Campbell’s book was very influential to him. This is the point where the person actually crosses into the field of adventure, leaving the known limits of his or her world and venturing into an unknown and dangerous realm where the rules and limits are unknown. The hero may need to fight against foes who are guarding the gate or border of the realm to prevent the hero from coming in. While on their way towards their task, the hero might meet some friends, allies, or people willing to help them. In between facing ordeals, the hero gets to see more of the fantastic land they are in. Not long after she begins her trek on the yellow brick road, Dorothy meets others that will help her on her quest. Numerous times she traverses back and forth from Kansas and the land of Oz and other neighboring fantasy lands filled with interesting characters. The real reason why ordinary humans like ourselves love these kinds of outlandish storylines is that we want to strive to be heroes ourselves. Vocabulary Building Find the word in the paragraph given. Use the synonyms and definition to help. P1: surpass, exceed (v.): ______________________________________________________ P2: a preset pattern (n.): ______________________________________________________ P4: to be a perfect example of (v.): ____________________________________________ P5: clearly, in full detail (adv.): _________________________________________________ P12: a complete and thorough change (n.): ____________________________________ P14: gentle, kind (adj.): _______________________________________________________ P17: although (conj.): _________________________________________________________ P18: equipped (v.): ___________________________________________________________ P19: a magical or medicinal potion (n.): ________________________________________ P20: great happiness (n.): _____________________________________________________ P20: extremely interested (adj.): ______________________________________________ P27: strange, unfamiliar (adj.): _________________________________________________ P28: involve (v.): _____________________________________________________________ The Hero’s Journey Written by Charity Davenport with material from the Wikipedia article “Monomyth“, Illustrations by W.W. Denslow for L. Frank Baum’s book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, Think about one of your favorite movies or stories. Chances are the story has a strong hero that you empathize with and aspire to become. And chances are this kind of story has been told for millennia, and yet people still love them. These stories transcend time and culture. In narratology and comparative mythology, the monomyth, or the hero’s journey, is the common template of a broad category of tales that involve a hero who goes on an adventure, and in a critical crisis wins a victory, and then comes home changed or transformed. The study of hero myth narratives started in 1871 with anthropologist Edward Taylor’s observations of common patterns in plots of heroes’ journeys. Later on, hero myth pattern studies were popularized by Joseph Campbell in his 1949 book The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Campbell and other scholars describe narratives of Gautama Buddha, Moses, and Jesus Christ in terms of the monomyth, and notice that many stories that humans have loved throughout time have some interesting patterns, and that there’s a good reason why these kinds of stories strike a chord in us. The stages of the hero’s journey can be found in all kinds of literature and movies, from thousands of years ago to now. Superhero movies epitomize the hero’s journey and are becoming bigger and bigger blockbusters each year. Even George Lucas himself, the creator of the groundbreaking Star Wars movie series, noted that Joseph Campbell’s book was very influential to him. The hero’s journey can be found in books like Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, The Chronicles of Narnia, and most other fantasy sci-fi books, legends, fairy tales, and comic book series like Spiderman and Batman. Many video games like The Legend of Zelda, Skyrim, the Final Fantasy and even the Pokémon series carry many elements of the hero’s journey. But fantasies aren’t real. Why do we love these stories so much? Because the monsters might not be real, the witches might not be real, and the magical objects and fantastic settings might not be real. But the struggle is. But before we talk about that, we need to dive deeper into the different stages of Campbell’s hero’s journey. The following list of stages also describes stages mentioned by other writers, like David Adams Leeming, who wrote a similar book inspired by Campbell’s book in 1981 called Mythology: The Voyage of the Hero, and Christopher Vogler who published The Writer’s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers in 2007. As you read, think about examples from stories, movies, or books you have read that might fit these stages. You’ll be surprised. As an example, the story of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, America’s most well-known mythology written in 1900 by L. Frank Baum, will be used to help explain the stages. There are many stages–not all monomyths necessarily contain all stages explicitly; some myths may focus on only one of the stages, while others may deal with the stages in a somewhat different order. The stages are divided into three parts–departure, initiation, and return. Part 1: Departure 1: Unusual Birth

      the way that Heroes have birth by it is always different

    1. “Sin is behovable—[playeth a needful part]—; but all shall be well” After this the Lord brought to my mind the longing that I had to Him afore. And I saw that nothing letted me but sin. And so I looked, generally, upon us all, and methought: If sin had not been, we should all have been clean and like to our Lord, as He made us.

      I feel like what this is trying to say is that even though it may not seem like it to use, that God purposefully created sin in the world. Without it, the world would not be able to function as it should. I think that this is referencing to the first sin committed by eve. In a Christian belief in the state of sin in which humanity has existed since the fall of man, stemming from Adam and Eve's rebellion in Eden, namely the sin of disobedience in consuming the forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. I feel like that Satan’s sin was pride. He was so beautiful, so wise, and so powerful as an angel that he began to covet God’s position and authority. He chafed at having to serve God and grew angry and rebellious. He did not want to serve, he wanted to be served; he, as a creature, wanted to be worshipped. "How starkly contrasted to our savior Jesus Christ, who came not to be ministered unto, but to minister and to give his life a ransom for many" (Mark 10:45).

    1. Washington Examiner

      Hello, I am the Citerpress bot :) I think this sentence is mentioning a news article without an explicit link. I looked in my news database and here is what I found:

      Hit #1 (score of 135.8)

      Hit #2 (score of 134.4)

      Hit #3 (score of 116.8)

      Hit #4 (score of 112.6)

      Hit #5 (score of 85.7)

      I did my best! My annotations will get better and better with time, as I index new pages every day.

    1. Marc Prensky points out to us that, “today’s students—K through college—represent the first generation of students to grow up with this new technology”, and as such, “have spent their entire lives surrounded by and using…tools of the digital age” (68).

      This is a great point, but I also think we must acknowledge that students may be born digital and yet not digitally savvy.

    1. Wherefore both when young and old a man must study philosophy, that as he grows old he may be young in blessings through the grateful recollection of what has been, and that in youth he may be old as well, since he will know no fear of what is to come.

      I found Epicurus' understanding of both the young and old enlightening, especially as he regards both unique to how our society esteems those close to birth or death. I have never thought of a child as wise given their lack of fear of what is to come, but more so as just having a lack of knowledge of the future that leads to this sense of invincibility. Similarly, I appreciate how he describes the old as being young through their blessings because they have learned to appreciate them, thus creating what appears to be a greater abundance of blessings. Epicurus' understanding of the similarities between what we think of as vastly different age groups connects society through an appreciation for those different from us.

    1. Omega Point

      This article is very poor. Theillard de Chardin's theory is an attempt by a devout Catholic scientist to reconcile religious ideas of the love of God and of teleology - that our life and world has a purpose, with scientific understanding. To leave that aspect out is to miss the entire point of his work. The theory is very influential in both Christian theology generally and especially Catholic theology, not just in the nineteenth century but is still influential through to the present.

      This article attempts to treat it as a purely scientific theory stripping away all religious elements. It cites mainly critics who ridicule the idea that religion is relevant to science and the idea that our universe may have any teleology or purpose. There would be the same problems writing an article about Christian ideas of the Resurrection that ignored the theological context. This approach is not used in other articles on Christian theology in Wikipedia.

      Rather than annotate particular points in this article I think it is best to just direct the reader to the entry on him in the French Wikipedia, which is much better, written as theology, as well as some summaries of his work by other authors.


      Point Oméga

      The Omega point is a dynamic concept created by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin , who gave it the name of the last letter of the Greek alphabet : Omega .

      For Teilhard, the Omega Point is the ultimate point of the development of complexity and consciousness towards which the universe (1) . According to his theory, exposed in The Future of Man and The Human Phenomenon , the universe is constantly evolving towards ever higher degrees of complexity and consciousness, (1) the Omega point being the culmination but also the cause of this evolution (1) . In other words, the Omega point exists in a supremely complex and supremely conscious way, transcending the universe in the making.

      For Teilhard the Omega point evokes the Christian Logos , that is Christ , in that it attracts all things to him and is, according to the Nicene symbol , "God born of God, Light born of the Light, true God born of the true God ", with the indication: " and by him all things were done ".

      Subsequently this concept was taken up by other authors, such as John G. Bennett (1965) or Frank Tipler (1994).

      The Omega point has five attributes, which Teilhard details in The Human Phenomenon .

      The five attributes In the book The Human Phenomenon (The Human Phenomenon, 1955), Teilhard describes the five attributes of the Omega point:

      • It has always existed - only in this way you can explain the evolution of the universe to higher levels of consciousness.

      • must be personal - a person and not an abstract idea; the greater complexity of the question has not only led to higher forms of consciousness, but to greater personalization, of which humans are the highest forms of the "personalization" of the universe. They are fully "individualized", free activity centers. It is in this sense that it is said that man was made in the image of God, which is the highest form of personality. Teilhard de Chardin expressly maintains that the Omega point, when the universe by unification will become one, we will not see the elimination of people, but the super-personalizing. The personality will be infinitely richer. Indeed, the Omega point unites the creation, and it unites, the universe becomes more complex and increases its consciousness. Just as God created the universe evolves to forms more complexity, consciousness, and finally with man, personality because God, the universe attracting to itself is a person.

      • It must be transcendent - the Omega Point is not the result of complexity and consciousness. It exists before the evolution of the universe, because the Omega Point is the cause of the evolution of the universe towards greater complexity, consciousness and personality. This essentially means that the Omega Point is located outside the context in which the universe is evolving, because it is because of its magnetic attraction that the universe tends to it.

      • must be independent - without limits of space and time.

      • It must be irreversible - which must provide the ability to reach.

      [1] Dominique de Gramont, Le Christianisme est un transhumanisme, Paris, Les éditions du cerf, septembre 2017, 365 p. (ISBN 978-2-204-11217-8)

      Oxford Scholarship Online

      This is how the idea is described by Linda Sargent Wood as summarized by Oxford Scholarship Online

      Merging Catholicism and science, Teilhard asserted that evolution was God's ongoing creative act, that matter and spirit were one, and that all was converging into one complete, harmonious whole. Though controversial, his organismic ideas offered an alternative to reductionistic, dualistic, mechanistic evolutionary views. They satisfied many who were looking for ways to reconnect with nature and one another; who wanted to revitalize and make personal the spiritual part of life; and who hoped to tame, humanize, and spiritualize science. In the 1960s many Americans found his book The Phenomenon of Man and other mystical writings appealing. He attracted Catholics seeking to reconcile religion and evolution, and he proved to be one of the most inspirational voices for the human potential movement and New Age religious worshipers. Outlining the contours of Teilhard's holistic synthesis in this era of high scientific achievement helps explain how some Americans maintained a strong religious allegiance.

      Wood, L.S., 2012. A More Perfect Union: Holistic Worldviews and the Transformation of American Culture after World War II. Oxford University Press.

      This is what Pope Benedict says about his idea of the omega point

      “Only where someone values love more highly than life, that is, only where someone is ready to put life second to love, for the sake of love, can love be stronger and more than death. If it is to be more than death, it must first be more than mere life. But if it could be this, not just in intention but in reality, then that would mean at the same time that the power of love had risen superior to the power of the merely biological and taken it into its service. To use Teilhard de Chardin’s terminology, where that took place, the decisive complexity or “complexification” would have occurred; bios, too, would be encompassed by and incorporated in the power of love. It would cross the boundary—death—and create unity where death divides. If the power of love for another were so strong somewhere that it could keep alive not just his memory, the shadow of his “I”, but that person himself, then a new stage in life would have been reached. This would mean that the realm of biological evolutions and mutations had been left behind and the leap made to a quite different plane, on which love was no longer subject to bios but made use of it. Such a final stage of “mutation” and “evolution” would itself no longer be a biological stage; it would signify the end of the sovereignty of bios, which is at the same time the sovereignty of death; it would open up the realm that the Greek Bible calls zoe, that is, definitive life, which has left behind the rule of death. The last stage of evolution needed by the world to reach its goal would then no longer be achieved within the realm of biology but by the spirit, by freedom, by love. It would no longer be evolution but decision and gift in one.”

      Orthodoxy of Teilhard de Chardin: (Part V) (Resurrection, Evolution and the Omega Point)

      Summary by Kahn Academy

      His views have also been seen as relevant to modern tanshumanists who want to apply technology to overcome our human limitations. Some of them think that his ideas foreshadowed this.

      A movement known as tranhumanism wants to apply technology to overcome human limitations. Followers believe that computers and humans may combine to form a “super brain,” or that computers may eventually exceed human brain capacity. Some transhumanists refer to that future time as the “Singularity.” In his 2008 article “Teilhard de Chardin and Transhumanism,” Eric Steinhart wrote that:

      Teilhard de Chardin was among the first to give serious consideration to the future of human evolution.... [He] is almost certainly the first to describe the acceleration of technological progress to a singularity in which human intelligence will become super intelligence.

      Teilhard challenged theologians to view their ideas in the perspective of evolution and challenged scientists to examine the ethical and spiritual implications of their knowledge. He fully affirmed cosmic and biological evolution and saw them as part of an even more encompassing spiritual evolution toward the goal of ultrahumans and complete divinity. This hypothesis still resonates for some as a way to place scientific fact within an overarching spiritual view of the cosmos, though most scientists today reject the notion that the Universe is moving toward some clear goal.

      Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Paleontologist, Mystic and Jesuit Priest - Kahn Academy

      Book review: The Phenomenon of Man by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

      By Tom Butler-Bowdon

      In a nutshell: By appreciating and expressing your uniqueness, you literally enable the evolution of the world.

      For Teilhard humankind was not the centre of the world but the ‘axis and leading shoot of evolution’. It is not that we will lift ourselves above nature but, in our intellectual and spiritual quests, dramatically raise its complexity and intelligence. The more complex and intelligent we become, the less of a hold the physical universe has on us, he believed.

      Just as space, the stars and galaxies expand ever outwards, the universe is just as naturally undergoing ‘involution’ from the simple to the increasingly complex; the human psyche also develops according to this law. ‘Hominisation’ is what Teilhard called the process of humanity becoming more human, or the fulfilment of its potential. ... Teilhard said as humanity became more self-reflective, able to appreciate its place in space and time, its evolution would start to move by great leaps instead of a slow climb. In place of the glacial pace of physical natural selection, there would be a supercharged refinement of ideas that would eventually free us of physicality altogether. We would move irresistibly toward a new type of existence, at which all potential would be reached. Teilhard called this the ‘omega point’.

      Book review: The Phenomenon of Man by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

    1. local organisers may be faster

      I'm not trained. I think training of "local" as in meetup organizers is an undue burden. (nevertheless, it'd be great to offer such training)

      But such training of all meetup organizers, IMO, is not practical, possibly unless we offer to pay such organizers for their time.

    2. We might all experience some frustration now and then, but we cannot allow that frustration to turn into a personal attack. It’s important to remember that a community where people feel uncomfortable or threatened is not a productive one. Members of the Write the Docs community should be respectful when dealing with other members as well as with people outside the community.

      This is redundant -- and I think risky, as it's also "legislating behavior.

      On top of that, people may feel threatened by discussions that don't violate most CoCs. Example: authors may feel threatened by criticism of their work.

      And now we're "legislating" behavior outside the community? Do we even have jurisdiction? This is like saying that the USA can prosecute its citizens for behavior in other countries.

    1. " After a year-long study of her kindergarten class, she comes to view the superhero play of the boys and the doll-corner play of the girls as narratives through which the children explore, define, and practice their cultural (e.g., gender) roles. The boys construct "serious drama" based on Star Wars and other contemporary superhero tales; the girls play at the "single drama" of the doll corner, which often becomes a Cinderella tale; together they reenact The Boxcar Children. Paley concludes that girl-play and boyplay are strikingly similar in that whether the "play" is Cinderella or Darth Vader, girls and boys are equally noisy, equally messy, and equally interested in "social order" (pp. 82, 23). " This statment is deffinitly true. They may gravitate to certain activities more than their peers of opposite sex, but they are definitly still loud and messy as any other child. It also makes me think of my Kindergarten students and how and what they play with more. My girls are normally together and either playing with the animals or reading and the boys rather play with the building toys. I do have a little girl who is very much like Ramona, she plays with whatever she wants. We played soccer and my girls stayed back most of the time but she was right in there with the boys. As I read the book and the article all I picture is this one student.

  8. May 2019
    1. enginethatistheproblembut,rather,theusersofsearchengineswhoare.Itsuggeststhatwhatismostpopularissimplywhatrisestothetopofthesearchpile
      • I wanted to highlight the previous sentence as well, but for some reason it wouldn't let me*

      I understand why the author is troubled by the campaign's opinion of "It's not the search engines fault". It makes it seem as if there was nothing that could be done to stop promoting those ideas, and that if something is popular it will just have to be the result at the top.

      This can be problematic, as people who were not initially searching that specific phrase may click through to read racist, sexist, homophobic, or biased information (to just name a few) that perpetuates inaccuracies and negative stereotypes. It provides easier access into dangerous thinking built on the foundations of racism, sexism, etc.

      If the algorithms are changed or monitored to remove those negative searches, the people exposed to those ideas would decrease, which could help tear down the extreme communities that can build up from them.

      While I do understand this view, I also think that system can be helpful too. All the search engine does is reflect the most popular searches, and if negative ideals are what people are searching, then we can become aware and direct their paths to more educational and unbiased sources. It could be interesting to see what would happen if someone clicked on a link that said "Women belong in the kitchen", that led them to results that spoke about equality and feminism.

    1. 92 ImperativesandCreative Culturediscussionof,'technologyandart',we rarely hearanybodytalkingabout'technologyasart'.41Yet it is not only theapparentusefulnessoftechnologythatimpels us to developit.Thereare imperatives thatdrive us beyondusefulness,thoughas we have seen, efforts to explainthemget us into difficult areas. Aesthetic satisfactions may be easy tounderstand,butwhen people talk about the cathedral-building impulseas'aspirationtohigherthings'one may suspect an evasion

      i love this idea of technology as art. and think that it should be promoted especially here at tech. what does it mean: technology as art? it means that through art innovation can arise, art inspires the next new idea, and creates visual appeal, emotional pleasure

    1. We can paraphrase Thurston as saying that mathematicians often don't think about mathematical objects using the conventional representations found in books. Rather, they rely heavily on what we might call hidden representations, such as the mental imagery Thurston describes, of groups breaking into formations of circular groups. Such hidden representations help them reason more easily than the conventional representations, and occasionally provide them with what may seem to others like magical levels of insight

      Hidden representations reminds me of a passage in Gleick's bio of Feynman:

      "Feynman said to Dyson, and Dyson agreed, that Einstein's great work had spring from physical intuition and that when Einstein stopped creating it was because 'he stopped thinking in concrete physical images and became a manipulator of equations.'

      "Intuition was not just visual but also auditory and kinesthetic. Those who watched Feynman in moments of intense concentration came away with a strong, even disturbing sense of the physicality of the process, as though his brain did not stop with the gray matter but extended through every muscle in his body."

    1. It may also be, as the scholar Anne Mangen has found in her work, that our minds are slightly befuddled by navigating ebooks.

      Ebooks can be confusing to people who are not familiar with the technology and as humans we get frustrated when something does not work the way we would like it to. Books are supposed to be relaxing, a sort of teleportation device that allows you to escape reality and not have to think about the frustrations of daily life.

    1. These parents are worried that their kids are influenced by the gender-identity exploration they’re seeing online and perhaps at school or in other social settings, rather than experiencing gender dysphoria.

      This reminds me about what we learned in class, about sex and the city. Sometimes the government and setting affect the way people portray themselves and their sexuality. The fluid is different and sometimes may or may not be as welcoming. So this can relate to the article since they feel their social setting is the cause of gender dysphoria. Some laws in different states also prohibit same sex marriage ultimately, causing them to think more heterosexually.

    1. “Do you know what you’re having?” “A lawyer,” I often answered. Or, “a doctor.” Occasionally, I’d say, “a rock guitarist.”

      I appreciate this response on so many levels. I feel like this type of humor reminds me of Maggie Nelsons narration of the Argonauts. She apologetically avoids homonormativity, (or maintain her queerness,) in a similar way that this author wishes to avoid the reveal of her unborn child's gender. I feel that us as humans often fall into social norms such as finding out the babies sex, as a way to please others, and avoid confrontation, which is why its probably easier to learn the sex as a means of preparation. But if we were to analyze that further- why do we want to know the sex? So that the baby shower registry will enlist blue or pink clothes, toys, accessories and more? Or so that we may day dream about having a Samuel or a Samantha? But at the same time, is that structure necessary for our children to develop an early concept of who their identity is? In this article; http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/raising-your-children-gender-neutrally the author expresses in more depth, the ideology behind allowing your child to pick his/her own gender. Her opening paragraph reads; "In recent times, it has become much more common and socially acceptable for parents to raise their children in gender neutral ways. As queer rights, feminist movements, and gender equality take on a greater social relevance, many caregivers no longer expect their children to behave stereo typically “masculine” or “feminine;”" Personally, I don't know where I necessarily stand on the topic of allowing a child to decide their own gender, however I think people should be aloud to be whoever they are from day one, regardless of the body parts you are born with. By not revealing the baby's sex, there is an opportunity to allow your child to come into the world without a predisposed concept of who they will be. And probably alot less pressure about fitting into that category as they grow older. (Another interesting article I found but didn't have time to read in its entirety is William Wants a Doll.Can He Have One? Linked here; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0891243204272968 in case anyone wants to read even more so in depth on this topic.)

    1. 162The Six Nations Iroquois ConfederacyDo not prosecute the Indians for the methods used to gain your attention, for the fault actually lies with the Government of the United States for ignoring Indians for so long.Put your energies and money now being expended for the suppression of Indian people at Wounded Knee into a real effort to understand why they are there. And begin here in the capitol through an investigation of the BIA, and of the government policies dealing with our most urgent needs.Reaffirm and respect the treaties entered into between our two peoples.Put your house in order with respect to our people, so that we may continue to coexist in peace and friendship as our grandfathers and their grandfathers tried so hard to do

      I think it's also really interesting how, in this text, they seem to give the American government specific instructions as to how they are to proceed from here. In past texts or past speeches, they seem to leave the solution more vague. Serves to show their frustration even more.

    1. You are quite elated by this freedom to juggle the record of your thoughts

      Yes, and. With so radically reduced barriers to re-working text, I think we enter a realm where Peter Elbow's thoughts on separating generative processes from critical processes becomes incredibly important. The narrative here is that you (the person witnessing the demonstration) didn't make use of the tools to their best effect during the composition process (where tools include the re-working tools of copy/paste/delete/cut, etc.). Those tools, however, may induce a kind of analysis paralysis. Which isn't to say other parts of the tools (like a keyboard for symbol input as opposed to pencil on paper) aren't huge improvements even without the editing stuff.

    1. For example, I have never had anything bad happen to me on Friday the 13th. Yet every time it happens, I am just a little more cautious and think about it more than any other date. But then I can go and laugh about how strange of an idea it is to believe that a date can cause bad things to happen. I think that it persists easily because it is a part of  my life and feels wrong to not react to it. I may never truly experience something that I can attribute to Friday the 13th to explain it, but I also may never experience anything to make me stop thinking about it as different.

      This section was partially here before, but lacked a clear idea and lacked the personal view. I added more details and a personal view to make the essay feel less research heavy and give my view that could help people have an easier time connecting to what I write. I also was attempting to get at an idea that was brought up in conference: what we lose if we lose cultural superstitions like Friday the 13th. I was never really certain of what that lose would be so I tried to provide information and examples so that a reader could see everything I see and try to understand that idea as well.

    1. In actuality, only 40% of American teens have sex by the time they finish high school these days, and research shows that the more teens know about sex, the more likely they are to not only delay sex, but to make healthier choices if they do decide to have it.

      Creating a health-positive norm is extremely effective and ought to be employed universally. I think the various methods of control in our world (the media, the political apparatus, and other agents of social control, even each other, as Foucault argued) would much rather believe that the decision making process for things in general should be left for a few set of people. It's not surprising that in actuality, teens are more likely to be responsible and conscious about making appropriate and safe decisions for themselves once they are given the proper knowledge regarding sex. On a broader sense I think that also applies for other "issues" in our society, too (example: encouraging people to become politically active participants so that they may make a conscious effort to be responsible for deciding who their elected politician are). We have been taught to fear things, and to be kept in the dark about certain things like knowledge about health sex, in order to be controlled by them. If learning about healthy sex (and what it entails) might make us demand more of the people around us, then it's likely to tilt us in a certain direction to demand more of the world around us too.

    2. For a lot of parents the idea of talking about the pleasure part of sex makes them feel like they are somehow condoning something they are supposed to condemn.

      I think that it is rather interesting that parents feel that discussing the pleasures of sex makes them feel like they are condoning sex. I think that this portrays the deeply entrenched mechanisms that have successfully taught our culture to shy away from, instead of celebrating and confronting sex for what it is and what it can be. What would our society look like if we finally lifted the veil that we have regarding all of these forms of sex related insecurities? Hiding conversations about sex-as-pleasure happens a lot even within couples, too. I think it's hard enough for some couples to talk about sex and satisfaction with each other, they may never even get to a point where they can discuss it with their kids because of their own personal insecurities regarding the topic.

    3. Though talking about pleasure is a good way to steer our kids towards better sex, expanding our understanding of pleasure is also an important component in helping them ensure that the sex they have is consensual.That’s because if some teens just expect sex to be mediocre, bad, uncomfortable, or even painful just something that only certain bodies and people of certain identities have the right to enjoy, then non-consensual situations simply become a lot more socially acceptable.For example, due to socialization, cis/hetero girls may not feel empowered to talk about bad or unwanted sex, and cis/hetero boys may feel less invested in ensuring their partners are fully on-board with everything that is going on

      I agree with this because some teens are only taught the importance of practicing safe sex, but not how important it is for them to know that sex should be pleasurable and consensual. Sex education often only include information on the benefits of abstinence, sexuality topics, contraceptive use, and STD prevention. However, most of the time it does not provide any information on pleasure and consent. We discussed in class that sex education would be most effective if it is a comprehensive program, however, those programs should also integrate morality into the curriculum. In the article, "Sex Education as Moral Education: teaching for pleasure, about fantasy, and against abuse", the author states the importance of the prevention of abuse by teaching males to practice respectful and considerate ways to sex. It is true that some teens do not feel that sex is pleasurable because they were never taught that, it is more of something that they learn on their own along the way. This should not be the case because sex should not be uncomfortable or painful for either party. If it is, then that person should be able to talk about how it is unwanted rather than to just keep it to themselves and push through the discomfort so that their partner feels pleasure. I feel that most of the time, people do not think too much about it because they want to please their partners, but that results in no pleasure for them. This can be seen as a type of abuse, and it should be taught in sex education so that teens are more aware that this is an issue, and not the standard.

    1. Presently, there are no perfect looking robots that can carry out physical tasks, but we do have clunky cable filled robots that are capable of thinking and learning by themselves. It isn’t available for public usage, but simple forms of AI include google homes and other hubs. They may not be able to do things without human intervention such as suddenly think it would be thoughtful to make you coffee, but it will make you coffee if you tell it to. It may not have a physical manner of getting up and making you coffee, but it can communicate with other devices that can make the coffee. 

      What you are saying in terms of content is good, but spend a little more time on the sentences themselves. Aim to write them in a way that is more direct. I think you'd get a lot of insight here from trying to read each of these sentences slowly out loud.

    1. I salivate in anticipation of the cinnamon coffee muffin I am about to devour. The walk down the stairs to breakfast reinforces the immediacy of home here. Although I may not have my family to greet me each morning, I delight in sharing my breakfast with other fellow 9-am-takers. Just as the particularly tired mornings at home go by without one word being spoken, so, too do my mornings here consist of an unvoiced coexistence. Though I do not personally know most of the individuals I see every morning, it is their presence and constancy that makes the transition from the top of the stairs to the bottom not only bearable, but something I eagerly await. I leave the thoughts of my family for a short while, only to be graced by my new family.

      I then go on to discuss how I appreciate the "unvoiced coexistence" of my mornings here at school. In my first draft, I again only briefly mention the other people's silence in the morning as we are all on our way to class. But, after reflecting on what sharing these mornings with these people means to me, I realized that sharing a morning with the same people here reminds me a lot of sharing my mornings over breakfast with my family at home. So, I decided to make this connection in this paragraph after telling the reader about the cinnamon muffin I have every morning. I think this passage is very important to my piece as a whole because it gives another reason as to why the stairs are a place worth writing about. I am making the point that one does not have to be constantly talking to people are actively engaging in exciting activities to feel as though he or she is part of a community. By explaining that although I do not "personally know" most of the people I see each morning, but still enjoy and appreciate their presence as I am walking down the stairs, I give the reader more insight into why the stairs are so notable to me. At the end of the passage, I discuss how as I transition from the top of the stairs to the bottom, I "leave the thoughts of my family for a short while, only to be graced by my new family." This statement again was something that was in the back of my mind while writing my first draft, but never explicitly put forth. I included it to show the reader that the stairs act as a physical symbol and place that allows me to fully immerse myself into life here at BC.

    1. Yet, in the application of science to the needs and desires of man, it would seem to be a singularly unfortunate stage at which to terminate the process, or to lose hope as to the outcome.

      That is a bleak way of ending his article, as it is near impossible to stop the desires of man. This relates Mark Zuckerberg and his want for the world to be interconnected in a peaceful manner, but can cause unforeseeable outcomes, like the onslaught of fake news and a Russian interference with the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.

    2. It is a suggestive thought, but it hardly warrants prediction without losing touch with reality and immediateness.

      Medium theory and the impacts it has on learning, association, dissemination of info, and instantaneity of resources that can hinder our hopes for progress.

    3. Is it not possible that we may learn to introduce them without the present cumbersomeness of first transforming electrical vibrations to mechanical ones, which the human mechanism promptly transforms back to the electrical form?

      This sounds like McLuhan when he asserts that the electric circuitry is an extension of the central nervous system. As we learn these mnemonic tools that we associate with to express our ideas digitally, it becomes much more fluid and natural.

    4. Technical difficulties of all sorts have been ignored, certainly, but also ignored are means as yet unknown which may come any day to accelerate technical progress as violently as did the advent of the thermionic tube.

      The advent of laptops, cellular phones to the progression of smart phones, and digital learning affects cognitive memory, but is ignored for the benefits that it reaps.

    5. sets a reproducer in action, photographs the whole trail out, and passes it to his friend for insertion in his own memex

      Envisioning the ability to annotate or repsond to a sent 'memex', or an e-mail.

    6. When the user is building a trail, he names it, inserts the name in his code book, and taps it out on his keyboard. Before him are the two items to be joined, projected onto adjacent viewing positions.

      The ability to use an open annotation format is pretty remarkable, because i do not know anyone that actually does this to be honest. However, I do realize what he was saying with the two side-by-side documents, as Bush is alluding to the ability to use tabs to be able to go back and forth after an item is searched or brought up. This is very much essential to a computer's functionality.

    7. It affords an immediate step, however, to associative indexing, the basic idea of which is a provision whereby any item may be caused at will to select immediately and automatically another. This is the essential feature of the memex.

      Does he mean a search engine?

    8. Deflection to the left gives him the same control backwards.

      These type of computers are similar to the archaic ones seen in libraries, yet the use of flipping a page or a 'return button' is stated here

    9. It consists of a desk, and while it can presumably be operated from a distance, it is primarily the piece of furniture at which he works. On the top are slanting translucent screens, on which material can be projected for convenient reading. There is a keyboard, and sets of buttons and levers. Otherwise it looks like an ordinary desk.

      This dude is wild, he got it right so far ahead of time.

    10. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility.

      With this, it seems just like phone data, but can thought of as the cloud, which collects all of ones data into one server. This is also similar to the rise of smart speakers, as their voice activation by requests allows almost instantaneous selection of information of resources. Or can simply just be referring to the Internet as a whole, where you can just google search anything and have your history saved. Thanks Alexa and Google!

    11. The world has arrived at an age of cheap complex devices of great reliability; and something is bound to come of it.

      This reminds me of the Creative Media Lab at MIT, as many of their inventions came prior to many recognizable computer functions, like GPS and a proto-type to Google Earth, but they did not patent nor have enough capital to sell the product. They just made it.

    12. truly significant attainments become lost in the mass of the inconsequential.

      Technology is constantly changing and what seemed new this week is already considered old news. Thus, critical info and conclusions can be overlooked if not handled correctly, especially if it can make an impact in understanding the global community -- like Mendel's concept on genetics.

    13. Yet specialization becomes increasingly necessary for progress, and the effort to bridge between disciplines is correspondingly superficial.

      People do not want interdisciplinary studies, they want these scientists and physicists to learn specific things in order to make something interdisciplinary.

    14. Now, for many, this appears to be approaching an end. What are the scientists to do next?

      After formulating nuclear weaponry is used for the justification of winning World War II, many of the remaining scientists are left wondering how they should apply their knowledge on warfare technology.

    1. Hey all, this is Michael – I am writing to test out this platform and to begin to build something in this document. I realize it’s slightly obscure at the moment how this pad will come to be useful during Publishing Sphere – I believe this will be come clearer in the coming days as we begin to roll out some of the sites, info, and programming for the gathering.

      Danny and I will be meeting tomorrow (Thursday, the 2nd of May) to discuss the publishing apparatus we have been discussing, and will begin to introduce it to the group as something to work off, develop in new directions, or to create publication systems concurrent to this one. Once we have this initial formulation mapped out, I’ll let him introduce it to you all to begin to discuss and edit.

      Shortly, I’ll post some info that I think is relevant to the gathering more generally, and then some additional information about you all so that you might begin to become more aware of the other members of the group. I’m truly looking forward to witnessing how you might all begin to work with one another.

      More soonest~

      M.

  9. Apr 2019
    1. Indeed, for art to be considered post-human, there must be a collaboration between technology and biology (machines and humans). And as Kirby (2012) notes, musicians’ reliance on DAWs is a great place to raise the question of machine and human collaboration.

      I agree but here's where it would have been helpful to have an example of such a collaboration that gives rise to some great music. I don't think we need to sacrifice what we consider good music when discussing machine-human collaborations, but we may need to rethink some of the categories we use to discern what we like and don't like as well as acknowledge the influences that contribute to these preferences.

    1. company worth having and think we may safely reckon on securing you two large families, one a rich West Indian from Surrey, the other a most respectable Girls Boarding School, or Academy, from Camberwell

      Defining the "rich" West Indian family and the "most respectable" Girls Boarding Academy as "company worth having" is a direct commentary on the socioeconomic break downs of society and Austen's views / judgment on what makes a society or company worth having. In Emma, Austen uses Harriet and Mrs. Elton to have even more pointed conversations about who and what is respectable company.

    1. People have witnessed how social media has changed lives. From being able to have business meetings no matter where you are in this world, or to having connections with people thousands of miles away, or being able to discuss issues with privacy, or being able to follow the news around the world. People have seen how social platforms have motivated people and grown businesses and even allowed for online education and learning tools for anything you can possibly think of. At the end of the day many rather sit in a class room and watch a YouTube video or scroll on Facebook than pay attention. Many can’t focus on doing homework or studying for an exam without checking their social media accounts. Many will compare themselves to others and believe that they are not worth anything. Many are looking at posts that make them upset, that make them insecure, and lose their attention spans. Many are addicted to something so fake and just crazy to follow. Many feel fake vibrations in their pockets when there isn’t one. Many are addicted to something that was created to make our lives easier and more entertaining, a way to make talking to someone one hundred times easier. But instead it made life for some awful. No matter what it is very hard to argue the fact the social platforms have made life much more productive and much simpler, and as social media grows it will benefit us even more. But it also has its vast amounts of negatives which cannot be overseen. Studies and statistic have proven that social media is taking a toll on our lives but they have also proven that with moderation we can still use all of our accounts but be more productive, have better attention spans, and have less issues with mental health. To every person their own and some may even say that social media has helped them, but it is clear that for many the correlation between social media usage and mental health issues is a vast issue and needs to fixed.

      no research here

    1. The restrictions mean New Zealanders could face legal consequences for intentionally looking at the Christchurch killer’s video, which may have been seen millions of times around the world.

      This is an interesting passage. Only because I think this is an important step forward for humanity, and it should be more enforced. I don't think anyone would disagree that intentionally watching and sharing a video about terrorist killing is morally wrong and reprehensible. But, as human (or at least Americans for sure), we have a strange primal need to look at disasters. When there is a car accident on the freeway, for instance, traffic forms as cars slowly roll by so that they can take in the damage. Even the saying from Tony Danza, which is now often repeated in different words, "Sometimes it's like watching a train wreck. You're uncomfortable, but you just can't help yourself" is an example of how people have an impulse to watch terrible, tragic things. I think society needs an enforceable guideline to deter watching this kind of tragedy.

    1. In 1866, the U.S. government forced the Cherokees, among others, to enfranchise their emancipated slaves, referred to as “Freedmen.

      I think we need to be very careful when evaluating what happened here. In many other circumstances we might have biased, strong feelings against what the United States made the Native Americans do. However, just because slavery is a highly offensive concept to us because we as a people outlawed it, we have to realize that this also was part of their civilization, as gruesome as it may be. So now the question is, was this a positive thing because slaves were emancipated or was it negative because it was an attack on Native American civilization?

    1. as a phase in the cultural life of the West, landscape [art as a genre) may already be over

      At a time when the landscape is changing so much due to the environmental crisis,I think capturing the landscapes while we still have them is important, because it is very unlikely that humans will be able to stop the damage we are doing to the planet.

    1. And you’re done. That may sound like a lot of steps, but each one is simple, fast, and fluid. Here are those steps executed in real time (video intentionally silent). I really encourage you to watch the video to see how ridiculously easy this is for someone with some training.

      I totally agree that this is easy, important, and something we should be doing to contribute positively to society. However, I think of majority of the time I am reading news which is on my phone when I am walking to class, or sitting on the train during summers, and I know myself well enough to say that unfortunately, I won't be looking up apa.org on my phone and fact checking. However, I do think it is something I should be doing. My question is how do we motivate people to do this?

    1. Perceived Discrimination against Black Americans and White Americans Authors

      The topic of perceived discrimination in the United States is obviously important, at least in the context of US psychology. Not surprisingly, a single cross-sectional original research report was published in Perspectives on Psychological Science, which normally publishes in-depth meta-psychological articles that reflect on major developments in psychology. The significance of Norton and Sommer’s article is more the political message than the contribution to psychological science. The key finding in Norton and Sommers’ article is statistically robust, t(208) = -3.94,p< .001, suggesting that a replication study in the same population would produce the same result. Of course, we cannot go back to the year the survey was conducted (which is not reported) and redo the study. The political climate in the United States has changed considerably after Obama was elected in 2008 and then again after Trump was elected in 2016. Thus, period effects alone can produce inconsistent results. However, as Zigerell points out, method effects may also play a role. Norton and Sommers asked participant for their opinions about racial discrimination in different time periods going back to the time before the civil rights movement. It is possible that ratings of current levels of perceived discrimination were influenced by a contrast effect in comparison to a time when official laws discriminated against African Americans in the United States. This hypothesis is not dependent on the time the survey is conducted. Thus, it would be interesting to see whether the reversal effect can be replicated in a direct replication of the original methodology. If so, it would strengthen the interpretation of Norton and Sommers’ results as an artifact of their methodology. Zigerell reports results from two new surveys. One survey was conducted right after Trump won the 2016 election. Study 2 was conducted in 2017. The actual month should be reported. During this time, police killings of African Americans and the “Black Lives Matter” movement were salient reminders of ongoing discrimination against African Americans in the United States. The results show clear differences in perceptions of discrimination by White and Black Americans. However, in contrast to Norton and Sommers’ findings there is no evidence that White Americans now perceive more discrimination against their own group than against African Americans. These results that were obtained in a larger sample make an important empirical contribution and help to prevent overgeneralization of Norton and Sommers’ results across time and methods. However, at present it is unclear what explains the inconsistent findings. Is it the survey methodology or is it another reversal in public opinions after 2016? A replication study of Norton and Sommers’ study could address this question. It could also produce new insight into context effects in surveys that ask for ratings of different time periods. The Conclusion was a bit unclear. I am not sure what the author means by “still have much potential for movement in a conservative direction,” and I suggest deleting this sentence. I think what is more important is to compare the perceptions to actual inequality and discrimination and to examine the large differences in perceptions between White and Black Americans. How much of this difference is purely due to cognitive differences (availability of examples) and how much is it due to (politically) motivated biases. In sum, although I think this manuscript could be expanded in several ways to make a bigger contribution, I think the results alone are worthy of publication.

    1. While therewould normally be an overlap between the student’s goals and those of the teacher,the degree of overlap may not be high

      I feel this statement applies to teaching volunteers especially. Striking the balance between designing a course with objectives that we think they should achieve with the type of objectives a volunteer coming in may be more likely to achieve is hard, especially with a really wide range of backgrounds coming in. As designers, we aren't in the position to make hard to achieve requirements- our goals have to be somewhat guided by what our typical student (adult volunteer) would be willing to work toward in our program.

    1. Increase Font Size Toggle Menu HomeReadSign in Search in book: Search Contents I. The Middle Ages (ca. 476-1485) 1. Bede (ca. 672-735) Bede: BiographyCaedmon’s Hymn 2. Dream of the Rood Dream of the Rood 3. Beowulf: Parts I & II Introduction: BeowulfStory SummaryThemesHistorical BackgroundLiterary StyleReading:Part IPart II 4. Beowulf: Part III Part III 5. Judith  Judith6. The Wanderer 7. Wulf and Eadwacer Wulf and Eadwacer 8. The Wife's Lament The Wife’s Lament 9. The Ruin The Ruin 10. Selection of Old English Riddles Selections from Old English Poems 11. The Myth of Arthur's Return Geoffrey of Monmouth: From The History of the Kings of BritainWace: From Roman de BrutLayamon: From Brut  II. Irish Literature 12. Cúchulainn’s Boyish Deeds Cúchulainn: IntroductionCuchulainn’s Boyish Deeds III. Anglo-Norman Literature 13. Tristan and Iseult Introduction: Tristan and IseultThe Story SummaryLiterary ThemesReading: Tristan and Yseult 14. Guide for Anchoresses (Ancrene Wisse) The Sweetness and Pain of Enclosure 15. Romances of Marie de France Marie de France: IntroductionArthurian LegendDiscussion Questions:Helpful ResourcesReading: THE LAY OF SIR LAUNFAL IV. Middle English Literature in the 14th and 15th Century 16. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (ca. 1375-1400) Introduction: Sir Gawain and the Green Knight 17. Sir Gawain: Parts I & II Part IPart II 18. Sir Gawain: Parts III & IV Part IIIPart IV19. Geoffrey Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales 20. Canterbury Tales: General Prologue Prologue 21. Canterbury Tales: Miller's Prologue and Tale Introduction: The Miller’s TaleStory SummaryReading: The Miller’s PrologueThe Miller’s Tale 22. Canterbury Tales: The Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale Introduction: The Wife of BathStory Summary:Reading: The Wife of Bath’s PrologueWife of Bath’s Tale 23. Canterbury Tales: The Pardoner's Prologue and Tale Introduction: The PardonerStory Summary:Reading: Pardoner’s PrologueThe Pardoner’s Tale 24. Canterbury Tales: The Nun's Priest's Tale Introduction: The Nun’s Priest’s TaleStory Summary:Reading: The Nun’s Priest’s Tale: PrologueThe Nun’s Priest’s Tale25. Chaucer's Retraction to Canterbury Tales26. Julian of Norwich: Revelations of Divine Love (Selections) 27. Margery Kempe: Excerpts from The Book of Margery Kempe Introduction: The Book of Margery Kempe BiographySummaryReading: The Birth of Her First Child and Her First Vision (excerpt)Her Pride and Attempts to Start a Business (excerpt)Margery and Her Husband Reach a Settlement28. The Wakefield Second Shepherd's Play29. Middle English Lyrics30. Robert Henryson: The Cock and the Jasp31. Everyman 32. Thomas Malory: Le Morte d'Arthur Introdution: Le Morte d’ArthurReading: Selection from Morte d’Arthur  V. The Sixteenth Century 33. Sir Thomas More: Utopia UTOPIA34. From: The Book of Common Prayer 35. WOMEN IN POWER: Selected Readings Mary I (Tudor): IntroductionMary Tudor: BiographyLady Jane Grey: IntroductionLady Jane: BiographyMary Queen of Scots: IntroductionElizabeth I: IntroductionBiography36. Edmund Spencer: the Faerie Queene (Book I) 37. Sir Walter Raleigh: Poems and From: The Discovery of the Large, Rich and Beautiful Empire of Guiana Sir Walter Raleigh: IntroductionBiography: Sir Walter RaleighPoems38. Sir Philip Sidney: From Astrophil and Stella 39. THE WIDER WORLD: Selected Readings The Wider World: Selected Readings Richard Hakluyt: BiographyReading: Hakluyt’s Dedicatory Epistle to The Principal Navigations, 1589Leo Africanus: BiographyReading: Leo Africanus on the North Africans, 1526An English Traveller’s Guide to the North Africans, 1547Voyage to the Arctic, 1577, with Reflections on Racial DifferenceAmadas and Barlowe’s Voyage to Virginia, 1584Introduction: Thomas Hariot BiographyHariot’s Report on Virginia, 1585General History of the Turks, 1603Introduction: Thomas Dallam BiographyReading: A Gift for the Sultan 40. Christopher Marlowe: Hero and Leander Hero and Leander 41. Christopher Marlowe: Doctor Faustus The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus 42. William Shakespeare: Selected Sonnets Introduction: Shakespeare’s SonnetsNotable Themes and SummariesReading: Selected Sonnets 43. William Shakespeare: Taming of the Shrew Introduction: Taming of the ShrewExtended OverviewReading: THE TAMING OF THE SHREW VI. Early Seventeenth Century 44. John Dunne: Selections Songs and SonnetsA Selection of Holy SonnetsFrom: Devotions upon Emergent Occasions45. Aemilia Lanyar: Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum 46. Ben Jonson: Epigrams and Poetry EpigramsPoemsFrom: Underwood 47. GENDER RELATIONS: Conflict and Counsel From: The Arraignment of Lewd, Idle, Froward, and Unconstant Women: Or the Vanity of Them Choose you WhetherRachel Speght: From A Muzzle for Melastomus William Gouge: From Domestical Duties48. Francis Bacon: Essays49. Margaret Cavendish: The Blazing World 50. George Herbert: The Temple The Temple 51. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: The Beheading of Charles I From: King Charles, His Trial (1649)From: A Perfect Diurnal of Some Passages in Parliament, no. 288Robert Filmer: From Patriarcha John Milton: From The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates Gerrard Winstanley: From A New Year’s Gift Sent to the Parliament and ArmyThomas Hobbes: From Leviathan 52. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: Political Writing Robert Filmer: From Patriarcha John Milton: From The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates Gerrard Winstanley: From A New Year’s Gift Sent to the Parliament and ArmyThomas Hobbes: From Leviathan 53. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: Writing the Self Lucy Hutchinson: From Memoirs of the Life of Colonel John HutchinsonEdward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon: From The History of the RebellionLady Anne Halkett: From The Memoires 54. John Milton: Poems and Sonnets LycidasSonnets 55. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 1-3) BOOK 1BOOK 2BOOK 3 56. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 4-6) BOOK 4BOOK 5BOOK 6 57. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 7-9) BOOK 7BOOK 8BOOK 9 58. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 10-12) BOOK 10BOOK 11BOOK 12 Appendix An Open Companion for British Literature I 49 Margaret Cavendish: The Blazing World THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW WORLD, CALLED The Blazing-World. WRITTEN By the Thrice Noble, Illustrious, and Excellent PRINCESSE, THE Duchess of Newcastle. LONDON,  Printed by A. Maxwell, in the Year M.DC.LX.VIII. To The Duchesse of Newcastle, On Her New Blazing-World. Our Elder World, with all their Skill and Arts, Could but divide the World into three Parts: Columbus, then for Navigation fam’d, Found a new World, America ’tis nam’d; Now this new World was found, it was not made, Onely discovered, lying in Time’s shade. Then what are You, having no Chaos found To make a World, or any such least ground? But your Creating Fancy, thought it fit To make your World of Nothing, but pure Wit. Your Blazing-World, beyond the Stars mounts higher, Enlightens all with a Cœlestial Fier. William Newcastle. To all Noble and Worthy Ladies. This present Description of a New World, was made as an Appendix to my Observations upon Experimental Philosophy; and, having some Sympathy and Coherence with each other, were joyned together as Two several Worlds, at their Two Poles. But, by reason most Ladies take no delight in Philosophical Arguments, I separated some from the mentioned Observations, and caused them to go out by themselves, that I might express my Respects, in presenting to Them such Fancies as my Contemplations did afford. The First Part is Romancical; the Second, Philosophical; and the Third is meerly Fancy; or (as I may call it) Fantastical. And if (Noble Ladies)you should chance to take pleasure in reading these Fancies, I shall account my self a Happy Creatoress: If not, I must be content to live a Melancholly Life in my own World; which I cannot call a Poor World, if Poverty be only want of Gold, and Jewels: for, there is more Gold in it, than all the Chymists ever made; or, (as I verily believe) will ever be able to make. As for the Rocks of Diamonds, I wish, with all my Soul, they might be shared amongst my Noble Female Friends; upon which condition, I would willingly quit my Part: And of the Gold, I should desire only so much as might suffice to repair my Noble Lord and Husband’s Losses: for, I am not Covetous, but as Ambitious as ever any of my Sex was, is, or can be; which is the cause, That though I cannot be Henry the Fifth, or Charles the Second; yet, I will endeavour to be, Margaret the First: and, though I have neither Power, Time nor Occasion, to be a great Conqueror, like Alexander, or Cesar; yet, rather than not be Mistress of a World, since Fortune and the Fates would give me none, I have made One of my own. And thus, believing, or, at least, hoping, that no Creature can, or will, Envy me for this World of mine, I remain, Noble Ladies, Your Humble Servant, M. Newcastle. The Description of a New World, Called The Blazing-World. A Merchant travelling into a foreign Country, fell extreamly in Love with a young Lady; but being a stranger in that Nation, and beneath her, both in Birth and Wealth, he could have but little hopes of obtaining his desire; however his Love growing more and more vehement upon him, even to the slighting of all difficulties, he resolved at last to Steal her away; which he had the better opportunity to do, because her Father’s house was not far from the Sea, and she often using to gather shells upon the shore accompanied not with above two to three of her servants it encouraged him the more to execute his design. Thus coming one time with a little leight Vessel, not unlike a Packet-boat, mann’d with some few Sea-men, and well victualled, for fear of some accidents, which might perhaps retard their journey, to the place where she used to repair; he forced her away: But when he fancied himself the happiest man of the World, he proved to be the most unfortunate; for Heaven frowning at his Theft, raised such a Tempest, as they knew not what to do, or whither to steer their course; so that the Vessel, both by its own leightness, and the violent motion of the Wind, was carried as swift as an Arrow out of a Bow, towards the North-pole, and in a short time reached the Icy Sea, where the wind forced it amongst huge pieces of Ice; but being little, and leight, it did by the assistance and favour of the gods to this virtuous Lady, so turn and wind through those precipices, as if it had been guided by some experienced Pilot, and skilful Mariner: But alas! Those few men which were in it, not knowing whither they went, nor what was to be done in so strange an Adventure, and not being provided for so cold a Voyage, were all frozen to death; the young Lady onely, by the light of her Beauty, the heat of her Youth, and Protection of the Gods, remaining alive: Neither was it a wonder that the men did freeze to death; for they were not onely driven to the very end or point of the Pole of that World, but even to another Pole of another World, which joined close to it; so that the cold having a double strength at the conjunction of those two Poles, was insupportable: At last, the Boat still passing on, was forced into another World; for it is impossible to round this Worlds Globe from Pole to Pole, so as we do from East to West; because the Poles of the other World, joining to the Poles of this, do not allow any further passage to surround the World that way; but if any one arrives to either of these Poles, he is either forced to return, or to enter into another World: and lest you should scruple at it, and think, if it were thus, those that live at the Poles would either see two Suns at one time, or else they would never want the Sun’s light for six months together, as it is commonly believed: You must know, that each of these Worlds having its own Sun to enlighten it, they move each one in their peculiar Circles; which motion is so just and exact, that neither can hinder or obstruct the other; for they do not exceed their Tropicks: and although they should meet, yet we in this World cannot so well perceive them, by reason of the brightness of our Sun, which being nearer to us, obstructs the splendor of the Sun of the other World, they being too far off to be discerned by our optick perception, except we use very good Telescopes; by which, skilful Astronomers have often observed two or three Suns at once. But to return to the wandering Boat, and the distresed Lady; she seeing all the Men dead, found small comfort in life; their Bodies which were preserved all that while from putrefaction and stench, by the extremity of cold, began now to thaw, and corrupt; whereupon she having not strength enough to fling them over-board, was forced to remove out of her small Cabine, upon the deck, to avoid the nauseous smell; and finding the Boat swim between two plains of Ice, as a stream that runs betwixt two shores, at last perceived land, but covered all with Snow: from which came, walking upon the Ice, strange Creatures, in shape like Bears, only they went upright as men; those Creatures coming near the Boat, catched hold of it with their Paws, that served them instead of hands; some two or three of them entred first; and when they came out, the rest went in one after another; at last having viewed and observed all that was in the Boat, they spake to each other in a language which the Lady did not understand; and having carried her out of the Boat, sunk it, together with the dead men. The Lady now finding her self in so strange a place, and amongst such wonderful kind of Creatures, was extreamly strucken with fear, and could entertain no other Thoughts, but that every moment her life was to be a sacrifice to their cruelty; but those Bear-like Creatures, how terrible soever they appear’d to her sight, yet were they so far from exercising any cruelty upon her, that rather they shewed her all civility and kindness imaginable; for she being not able to go upon the Ice, by reason of its slipperiness, they took her up in their rough arms, and carried her into their City, where instead of Houses, they had Caves under ground; and as soon as they enter’d the City, both Males and Females, young and old, flockt together to see this Lady, holding up their Paws in admiration; at last having brought her into a certain large and spacious Cave, which they intended for her reception, they left her to the custody of the Females, who entertained her with all kindness and respect, and gave her such victuals as they used to eat; but seeing her Constitution neither agreed with the temper of that Climate, nor their Diet, they were resolved to carry her into another Island of a warmer temper; in which were men like Foxes, onely walking in an upright shape, who received their neighbours the Bear-men with great civility and Courtship, very much admiring this beauteous Lady; and having discoursed some while together, agreed at last to make her a Present to the Emperor of their World; to which end, after she had made some short stay in the same place, they brought her cross that Island to a large River, whose stream run smooth and clear, like Chrystal; in which were numerous Boats, much like our Fox-traps; in one whereof she was carried, some of the Bear- and Fox-men waiting on her; and as soon as they had crossed the River, they came into an Island where there were Men which had heads, beaks and feathers, like wild-Geese, onely they went in an upright shape, like the Bear-men and Fox-men: their rumps they carried between their legs, their wings were of the same length with their Bodies, and their tails of an indifferent size, trailing after them like a Ladie’s Garment; and after the Bear- and Fox-men had declared their intention and design to their Neighbours, the Geese- or Bird-men, some of them joined to the rest, and attended the Lady through that Island, till they came to another great and large River, where there was a preparation made of many Boats, much like Birds nests, onely of a bigger size; and having crost that River, they arrived into another Island, which was of a pleasant and mild temper, full of Woods and the Inhabitants thereof were Satyrs, who received both the Bear- Fox- and Bird men, with all respect and civility; and after some conferences (for they all understood each others language) some chief of the Satyrs joining to them, accompanied the Lady out of that Island to another River, wherein were many handsome and commodious Barges; and having crost that River, they entered into a large and spacious Kingdom, the men whereof were of a Grass-Green Complexion, who entertained them very kindly, and provided all conveniences for their further voyage: hitherto they had onely crost Rivers, but now they could not avoid the open Seas any longer; wherefore they made their Ships and tacklings ready to sail over into the Island, where the Emperor of the Blazing- world (for so it was call’d) kept his residence. Very good Navigators they were; and though they had no knowledg of the Load-stone, or Needle or pendulous Watches, yet (which was as serviceable to them) they had subtile observations, and great practice; in so much that they could not onely tell the depth of the Sea in every place, but where there were shelves of Sand, Rocks, and other obstructions to be avoided by skilful and experienced Sea-men: Besides, they were excellent Augurers, which skill they counted more necessary and beneficial then the use of Compasses, Cards, Watches, and the like; but, above the rest, they had an extraordinary Art, much to be taken notice of by Experimental Philosophers, and that was a certain Engin, which would draw in a great quantity of Air, and shoot forth Wind with a great force; this Engine in a calm, they placed behind their Ships, and in a storm, before; for it served against the raging waves, like Cannons against an hostile Army, or besieged Town; it would batter and beat the waves in pieces, were they as high as Steeples; and as soon as a breach was made, they forced their passage through, in spight even of the most furious wind, using two of those Engins at every Ship, one before, to beat off the waves, and another behind to drive it on; so that the artificial wind had the better of the natural; for, it had a greater advantage of the waves, then the natural of the Ships: the natural being above the face of the Water, could not without a down right motion enter or press into the Ships; whereas the artificial with a sideward-motion, did pierce into the bowels of the Waves: Moreover, it is to be observed, that in a great Tempest they would join their Ships in battel-aray: and when they feared Wind and Waves would be too strong for them, if they divided their Ships; they joined as many together as the compass or advantage of the places of the Liquid Element would give them leave. For, their Ships were so ingeniously contrived, that they could fasten them together as close as a Honey-comb, without waste of place; and being thus united, no Wind nor Waves were able to separate them. The Emperor’s Ships, were all of Gold; but the Merchants and Skippers, of Leather; the Golden Ships were not much heavier then ours of Wood, by reason they were neatly made, and required not such thickness, neither were they troubled with Pitch, Tar, Pumps, Guns, and the like, which make our Woodden-Ships very heavy; for though they were not all of a piece, yet they were so well sodder’d, that there was no fear of Leaks, Chinks, or Clefts; and as for Guns, there was no use of them, because they had no other enemies but the Winds: But the Leather Ships were not altogether so sure, although much leighter; besides, they were pitched to keep out Water. Having thus prepar’d, and order’d their Navy, they went on in despight of Calm or Storm: And though the Lady at first fancied her self in a very sad condition, and her mind was much tormented with doubts and fears, not knowing whether this strange Adventure would tend to her safety or destruction; yet she being withal of a generous spirit, and ready wit, considering what dangers she had past, and finding those sorts of men civil and diligent attendants to her, took courage, and endeavoured to learn their language; which after she had obtained so far, that partly by some words and signs she was able to apprehend their meaning, she was so far from being afraid of them, that she thought her self not onely safe, but very happy in their company: By which we may see, that Novelty discomposes the mind, but acquaintance settles it in peace and tranquillity. At last, having passed by several rich Islands and Kingdoms, they went towards Paradise, which was the seat of the Emperor; and coming in sight of it, rejoiced very much; the Lady at first could perceive nothing but high Rocks, which seemed to touch the Skies; and although they appear’d not of an equal heigth, yet they seemed to be all one piece, without partitions: but at last drawing nearer, she perceived a clift, which was a part of those Rocks, out of which she spied coming forth a great number of Boats, which afar off shewed like a company of Ants, marching one after another; the Boats appeared like the holes or partitions in a Honey-comb, and when joined together, stood as close; the men were of several Complexions, but none like any of our World; and when both the Boats and Ships met, they saluted and spake to each other very courteously; for there was but one language in all that World: nor no more but one Emperor, to whom they all submitted with the greatest duty and obedience, which made them live in a continued Peace and Happiness; not acquainted with Foreign Wars or Home-bred Insurrections. The Lady now being arrived at this place, was carried out of her Ship into one of those Boats, and conveighed through the same passage (for there was no other) into that part of the World where the Emperor did reside; which part was very pleasant, and of a mild temper: Within it self it was divided by a great number of vast and large Rivers, all ebbing and flowing, into several Islands of unequal distance from each other, which in most parts were as pleasant, healthful, rich, and fruitful, as Nature could make them; and, as I mentioned before, secure from all Foreign Invasions, by reason there was but one way to enter, and that like a Labyrinth, so winding and turning among the Rocks, that no other Vessels but small Boats, could pass, carrying not above three passengers at a time: On each side all along the narrow and winding River, there were several Cities, some of Marble, some of Alabaster, some of Agat, some of Amber, some of Coral, and some of other precious materials not known in our world; all which after the Lady had passed, she came to the Imperial City, named Paradise, which appeared in form like several Islands; for, Rivers did run betwixt every street, which together with the Bridges, whereof there was a great number, were all paved. The City it self was built of Gold; and their Architectures were noble, stately, and magnificent, not like our Modern, but like those in the Romans time; for, our Modern Buildings are like those Houses which Children use to make of Cards, one story above another, fitter for Birds, then Men; but theirs were more Large, and Broad, then high; the highest of them did not exceed two stories, besides those rooms that were under-ground, as Cellars, and other Offices. The Emperor’s Palace stood upon an indifferent ascent from the Imperial City; at the top of which ascent was a broad Arch, supported by several Pillars, which went round the Palace, and contained four of our English miles in compass: within the Arch stood the Emperor’s Guard, which consisted of several sorts of Men; at every half mile, was a Gate to enter, and every Gate was of a different fashion; the first, which allowed a passage from the Imperial City into the Palace, had on either hand a Cloyster, the outward part whereof stood upon Arches sustained by Pillars, but the inner part was close: Being entred through the Gate, the Palace it self appear’d in its middle like the Isle of a Church, a mile and a half long, and half a mile broad; the roof of it was all Arched, and rested upon Pillars, so artificially placed that a stranger would lose himself therein without a Guide; at the extream sides, that is, between the outward and inward part of the Cloyster, were Lodgings for Attendants; and in the midst of the Palace, the Emperor’s own Rooms; whose Lights were placed at the top of every one, because of the heat of the Sun: the Emperor’s appartment for State was no more inclosed then the rest; onely an Imperial Throne was in every appartment, of which the several adornments could not be perceived until one entered, because the Pillars were so just opposite to one another, that all the adornments could not be seen at one. The first part of the Palace was, as the Imperial City, all of Gold; and when it came to the Emperors appartment, it was so rich with Diamonds, Pearls, Rubies, and the like precious Stones, that it surpasses my skill to enumerate them all. Amongst the rest, the Imperial Room of State appear’d most magnificent; it was paved with green Diamonds (for there are in that World Diamonds of all Colours) so artificially, as it seemed but of one piece; the Pillars were set with Diamonds so close, and in such a manner, that they appear’d most Glorious to the sight; between every Pillar was a Bow or Arch of a certain sort of Diamonds, the like whereof our World does not afford; which being placed in every one of the Arches in several rows, seemed just like so many Rain-bows of several different colours. The roof of the Arches was of blew Diamonds, and in the midst thereof was a Carbuncle, which represented the Sun; and the Rising and Setting-Sun at the East and West-side of the Room were made of Rubies. Out of this Room there was a passage into the Emperor’s Bed-Chamber, the Walls whereof were of Jet, and the Floor of black Marble; the Roof was of Mother of Pearl, where the Moon and Blazing-Stars were represented by white Diamonds, and his Bed was made of Diamonds and Carbuncles. No sooner was the Lady brought before the Emperor, but he conceived her to be some Goddess, and offered to worship her; which she refused, telling him, (for by that time she had pretty well learned their Language) that although she came out of another world, yet was she but a mortal. At which the Emperor rejoycing, made her his Wife, and gave her an absolute power to rule and govern all that World as she pleased. But her subjects, who could hardly be perswaded to believe her mortal, tender’d her all the Veneration and Worship due to a Deity. Her Accoustrement after she was made Empress, was as followeth: On her head she wore a Cap of Pearl, and a Half-moon of Diamonds just before it; on the top of her Crown came spreading over a broad Carbuncle, cut in the form of the Sun; her Coat was of Pearl, mixt with blew Diamonds, and frindged with red ones; her Buskins and Sandals were of green Diamonds; In her left hand she held a Buckler, to signifie the Defence of her Dominions; which Buckler was made of that sort of Diamond as has several different Colours; and being cut and made in the form of an Arch, shewed like a Rain-bow; In her right hand she carried a Spear made of white Diamond, cut like the tail of a Blazing Star, which signified that she was ready to assault those that proved her Enemies. None was allowed to use or wear Gold but those of the Imperial Race, which were the onely Nobles of the State; nor durst any one wear Jewels but the Emperor, the Empress and their Eldest Son; notwithstanding that they had an infinite quantity both of Gold and precious Stones in that World; for they had larger extents of Gold, then our Arabian Sands; their precious Stones were Rocks, and their Diamonds of several Colours; they used no Coyn, but all their Traffick was by exchange of several Commodities. Their Priests and Governors were Princes of the Imperial Blood, and made Eunuches for that purpose; and as for the ordinary sort of men in that part of the World where the Emperor resided, they were of several Complexions; not white, black, tawny, olive or ash-coloured; but some appear’d of an Azure, some of a deep Purple, some of a Grass-green, some of a Scarlet, some of an Orange-colour, &c. Which Colours and Complexions, whether they were made by the bare reflection of light, without the assistance of small particles; or by the help of well-ranged and order’d Atoms; or by a continual agitation of little Globules; or by some pressing and re-acting motion, I am not able to determine. The rest of the Inhabitants of that World, were men of several different sorts, shapes, figures, dispositions, and humors, as I have already made mention, heretofore; some were Bear-men, some Worm-men, some Fish- or Mear-men, otherwise called Syrens; some Bird-men, some Fly-men, some Ant-men, some Geese-men, some Spider-men, some Lice-men, some Fox-men, some Ape-men, some Jack daw-men, some Magpie-men, some Parrot-men, some Satyrs, some Gyants, and many more, which I cannot all remember; and of these several sorts of men, each followed such a profession as was most proper for the nature of their Species, which the Empress encouraged them in, especially those that had applied themselves to the study of several Arts and Sciences; for they were as ingenious and witty in the invention of profitable and useful Arts, as we are in our world, nay, more; and to that end she erected Schools, and founded several Societies. The Bear-men were to be her Experimental Philosophers, the Bird-men her Astronomers, the Fly- Worm- and Fish-men her Natural Philosophers, the Ape-men her Chymists, the Satyrs her Galenick Physicians, the Fox-men her Politicians, the Spider- and Lice-men her Mathematicians, the Jackdaw- Magpie- and Parrot-men her Orators and Logicians, the Gyants her Architects, &c. But before all things, she having got a Soveraign power from the Emperor over all the World, desired to be informed both of the manner of their Religion and Government; and to that end she called the Priests and States men, to give her an account of either. Of the States men she enquired, first, Why they had so few Laws? To which they answered, That many Laws made many Divisions, which most commonly did breed Factions, and at last brake out into open Wars. Next, she asked, Why they preferred the Monarchical form of Government before any other? They answered, That as it was natural for one Body to have but one Head, so it was also natural for a Politick body to have but one Governor; and that a Common-wealth, which had many Governors was like a Monster with many Heads. Besides, said they, a Monarchy is a divine form of Government, and agrees most with our Religion: For as there is but one God, whom we all unanimously worship and adore with one Faith; so we are resolved to have but one Emperor, to whom we all submit with one obedience. Then the Empress seeing that the several sorts of her Subjects had each their Churches apart, asked the Priests, whether they were of several Religions? They answered her Majesty, That there was no more but one Religion in all that World, nor no diversity of opinions in that same Religion for though there were several sorts of men, yet had they all but one opinion concerning the Worship and Adoration of God. The Empress asked them, Whether they were Jews, Turks, or Christians? We do not know, said they, what Religions those are; but we do all unanimously acknowledg, worship and adore the Onely, Omnipotent, and Eternal God, with all reverence, submission, and duty. Again, the Empress enquired, Whether they had several Forms of Worship? They answered, No: For our Devotion and Worship consists onely in Prayers, which we frame according to our several Necessities, in Petitions, Humiliations, Thanksgiving, &c. Truly, replied the Empress, I thought you had been either Jews, or Turks, because I never perceived any Women in your Congregations: But what is the reason, you bar them from your religious Assemblies? It is not fit, said they, that Men and Women should be promiscuously together in time of Religious Worship; for their company hinders Devotion, and makes many, instead of praying to God, direct their Devotion to their Mistresses. But, asked the Empress, Have they no Congregation of their own, to perform the duties of Divine Worship, as well as Men? No, answered they: but they stay at home, and say their Prayers by themselves in their Closets. Then the Empress desir’d to know the reason why the Priests and Governors of their World were made Eunuchs? They answer’d, To keep them from Marriage: For Women and Children most commonly make disturbance both in Church and State. But, said she, Women and Children have no Employment in Church or State. ‘Tis true, answer’d they; but, although they are not admitted to publick Employments, yet are they so prevalent with their Husbands and Parents, that many times by their importunate perswasions, they cause as much, nay, more mischief secretly, then if they had the management of publick Affairs. The Empress having received an information of what concerned both Church and State, passed some time in viewing the Imperial Palace, where she admired much the skil and ingenuity of the Architects, and enquired of them, first, Why they built their Houses no higher then two stories from the Ground? They answered her Majesty, That the lower their Buildings were, the less were they subject either to the heat of the Sun, or Wind, Tempest, Decay, &c. Then she desired to know the reason, why they made them so thick? They answered, That, the thicker the Walls were, the warmer they were in Winter, the cooler in Summer; for their thickness kept out both the Cold and Heat. Lastly, she asked, Why they Arched their Roofs, and made so many Pillars? They replied, That Arches and Pillars, did not onely grace a Building very much, and caused it to appear Magnificent, but made it also firm and lasting. The Empress was very well satisfied with their answers; and after some time, when she thought that her new founded societies of the Vertuoso’s had made a good progress in the several Employments she had put them upon, she caused a Convocation first of the Bird-men, and commanded them to give her a true relation of the two Cœlestial Bodies, viz. the Sun and Moon, which they did with all the obedience and faithfulness befitting their duty. The Sun, as much as they could observe, they related to be a firm or solid Stone, of a vast bigness; of colour yellowish, and of an extraordinary splendor: But the Moon, they said, was of a whitish colour; and although she looked dim in the presence of the Sun, yet had she her own light, and was a shining body of her self, as might be perceived by her vigorous appearance in Moon-shiny-nights; the difference onely betwixt her own and the Sun’s light was, that the Sun did strike his beams in a direct line; but the Moon never respected the Centre of their World in a right line, but her Centre was always excentrical. The Spots both in the Sun and Moon, as far as they were able to perceive, they affirmed to be nothing else but flaws and stains of their stony Bodies. Concerning the heat of the Sun, they were not of one opinion; some would have the Sun hot in it self, alledging an old Tradition, that it should at some time break asunder, and burn the Heavens, and consume this world into hot Embers, which, said they, could not be done, if the Sun were not fiery of it self. Others again said, This opinion could not stand with reason; for Fire being a destroyer of all things, the Sun-stone after this manner would burn up all the near adjoining Bodies: Besides, said they, Fire cannot subsist without fuel; and the Sunstone having nothing to feed on, would in a short time consume it self; wherefore they thought it more probable that the Sun was not actually hot, but onely by the reflection of its light; so that its heat was an effect of its light, both being immaterial. But this opinion again was laught at by others, and rejected as ridiculous, who thought it impossible that one immaterial should produce another; and believed that both the light and heat of the Sun proceeded from a swift Circular motion of the Æthereal Globules, which by their striking upon the Optick nerve, caused light, and their motion produced heat: But neither would this opinion hold; for, said some, then it would follow, that the sight of Animals is the cause of light; and that, were there no eyes, there would be no light; which was against all sense and reason. Thus they argued concerning the heat and light of the Sun; but, which is remarkable, none did say, that the Sun was a Globous fluid body, and had a swift Circular motion; but all agreed, It was fixt and firm like a Center, and therefore they generally called it the Sun-stone. Then the Empress asked them the reason, Why the Sun and Moon did often appear in different postures or shapes, as sometimes magnified, sometimes diminished; sometimes elevated, otherwhiles depressed;

      A good take on diversity. Symbolism of the Sun and Moon could mean diversity of Men (Sun) and Women (Moon). And the statement of the Air playing a big role in the differences of these two great powers to me sounds like a common factor. So maybe the Air is meant to symbolize (in a very loose sense) society that changes constantly and is different in both the presence of the Sun and the Moon......I honestly don't know where I'm going with this but this is the best I got.

    2. Increase Font Size Toggle Menu HomeReadSign in Search in book: Search Contents I. The Middle Ages (ca. 476-1485) 1. Bede (ca. 672-735) Bede: BiographyCaedmon’s Hymn 2. Dream of the Rood Dream of the Rood 3. Beowulf: Parts I & II Introduction: BeowulfStory SummaryThemesHistorical BackgroundLiterary StyleReading:Part IPart II 4. Beowulf: Part III Part III 5. Judith  Judith6. The Wanderer 7. Wulf and Eadwacer Wulf and Eadwacer 8. The Wife's Lament The Wife’s Lament 9. The Ruin The Ruin 10. Selection of Old English Riddles Selections from Old English Poems 11. The Myth of Arthur's Return Geoffrey of Monmouth: From The History of the Kings of BritainWace: From Roman de BrutLayamon: From Brut  II. Irish Literature 12. Cúchulainn’s Boyish Deeds Cúchulainn: IntroductionCuchulainn’s Boyish Deeds III. Anglo-Norman Literature 13. Tristan and Iseult Introduction: Tristan and IseultThe Story SummaryLiterary ThemesReading: Tristan and Yseult 14. Guide for Anchoresses (Ancrene Wisse) The Sweetness and Pain of Enclosure 15. Romances of Marie de France Marie de France: IntroductionArthurian LegendDiscussion Questions:Helpful ResourcesReading: THE LAY OF SIR LAUNFAL IV. Middle English Literature in the 14th and 15th Century 16. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (ca. 1375-1400) Introduction: Sir Gawain and the Green Knight 17. Sir Gawain: Parts I & II Part IPart II 18. Sir Gawain: Parts III & IV Part IIIPart IV19. Geoffrey Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales 20. Canterbury Tales: General Prologue Prologue 21. Canterbury Tales: Miller's Prologue and Tale Introduction: The Miller’s TaleStory SummaryReading: The Miller’s PrologueThe Miller’s Tale 22. Canterbury Tales: The Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale Introduction: The Wife of BathStory Summary:Reading: The Wife of Bath’s PrologueWife of Bath’s Tale 23. Canterbury Tales: The Pardoner's Prologue and Tale Introduction: The PardonerStory Summary:Reading: Pardoner’s PrologueThe Pardoner’s Tale 24. Canterbury Tales: The Nun's Priest's Tale Introduction: The Nun’s Priest’s TaleStory Summary:Reading: The Nun’s Priest’s Tale: PrologueThe Nun’s Priest’s Tale25. Chaucer's Retraction to Canterbury Tales26. Julian of Norwich: Revelations of Divine Love (Selections) 27. Margery Kempe: Excerpts from The Book of Margery Kempe Introduction: The Book of Margery Kempe BiographySummaryReading: The Birth of Her First Child and Her First Vision (excerpt)Her Pride and Attempts to Start a Business (excerpt)Margery and Her Husband Reach a Settlement28. The Wakefield Second Shepherd's Play29. Middle English Lyrics30. Robert Henryson: The Cock and the Jasp31. Everyman 32. Thomas Malory: Le Morte d'Arthur Introdution: Le Morte d’ArthurReading: Selection from Morte d’Arthur  V. The Sixteenth Century 33. Sir Thomas More: Utopia UTOPIA34. From: The Book of Common Prayer 35. WOMEN IN POWER: Selected Readings Mary I (Tudor): IntroductionMary Tudor: BiographyLady Jane Grey: IntroductionLady Jane: BiographyMary Queen of Scots: IntroductionElizabeth I: IntroductionBiography36. Edmund Spencer: the Faerie Queene (Book I) 37. Sir Walter Raleigh: Poems and From: The Discovery of the Large, Rich and Beautiful Empire of Guiana Sir Walter Raleigh: IntroductionBiography: Sir Walter RaleighPoems38. Sir Philip Sidney: From Astrophil and Stella 39. THE WIDER WORLD: Selected Readings The Wider World: Selected Readings Richard Hakluyt: BiographyReading: Hakluyt’s Dedicatory Epistle to The Principal Navigations, 1589Leo Africanus: BiographyReading: Leo Africanus on the North Africans, 1526An English Traveller’s Guide to the North Africans, 1547Voyage to the Arctic, 1577, with Reflections on Racial DifferenceAmadas and Barlowe’s Voyage to Virginia, 1584Introduction: Thomas Hariot BiographyHariot’s Report on Virginia, 1585General History of the Turks, 1603Introduction: Thomas Dallam BiographyReading: A Gift for the Sultan 40. Christopher Marlowe: Hero and Leander Hero and Leander 41. Christopher Marlowe: Doctor Faustus The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus 42. William Shakespeare: Selected Sonnets Introduction: Shakespeare’s SonnetsNotable Themes and SummariesReading: Selected Sonnets 43. William Shakespeare: Taming of the Shrew Introduction: Taming of the ShrewExtended OverviewReading: THE TAMING OF THE SHREW VI. Early Seventeenth Century 44. John Dunne: Selections Songs and SonnetsA Selection of Holy SonnetsFrom: Devotions upon Emergent Occasions45. Aemilia Lanyar: Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum 46. Ben Jonson: Epigrams and Poetry EpigramsPoemsFrom: Underwood 47. GENDER RELATIONS: Conflict and Counsel From: The Arraignment of Lewd, Idle, Froward, and Unconstant Women: Or the Vanity of Them Choose you WhetherRachel Speght: From A Muzzle for Melastomus William Gouge: From Domestical Duties48. Francis Bacon: Essays49. Margaret Cavendish: The Blazing World 50. George Herbert: The Temple The Temple 51. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: The Beheading of Charles I From: King Charles, His Trial (1649)From: A Perfect Diurnal of Some Passages in Parliament, no. 288Robert Filmer: From Patriarcha John Milton: From The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates Gerrard Winstanley: From A New Year’s Gift Sent to the Parliament and ArmyThomas Hobbes: From Leviathan 52. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: Political Writing Robert Filmer: From Patriarcha John Milton: From The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates Gerrard Winstanley: From A New Year’s Gift Sent to the Parliament and ArmyThomas Hobbes: From Leviathan 53. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: Writing the Self Lucy Hutchinson: From Memoirs of the Life of Colonel John HutchinsonEdward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon: From The History of the RebellionLady Anne Halkett: From The Memoires 54. John Milton: Poems and Sonnets LycidasSonnets 55. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 1-3) BOOK 1BOOK 2BOOK 3 56. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 4-6) BOOK 4BOOK 5BOOK 6 57. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 7-9) BOOK 7BOOK 8BOOK 9 58. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 10-12) BOOK 10BOOK 11BOOK 12 Appendix An Open Companion for British Literature I 49 Margaret Cavendish: The Blazing World THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW WORLD, CALLED The Blazing-World. WRITTEN By the Thrice Noble, Illustrious, and Excellent PRINCESSE, THE Duchess of Newcastle. LONDON,  Printed by A. Maxwell, in the Year M.DC.LX.VIII. To The Duchesse of Newcastle, On Her New Blazing-World. Our Elder World, with all their Skill and Arts, Could but divide the World into three Parts: Columbus, then for Navigation fam’d, Found a new World, America ’tis nam’d; Now this new World was found, it was not made, Onely discovered, lying in Time’s shade. Then what are You, having no Chaos found To make a World, or any such least ground? But your Creating Fancy, thought it fit To make your World of Nothing, but pure Wit. Your Blazing-World, beyond the Stars mounts higher, Enlightens all with a Cœlestial Fier. William Newcastle. To all Noble and Worthy Ladies. This present Description of a New World, was made as an Appendix to my Observations upon Experimental Philosophy; and, having some Sympathy and Coherence with each other, were joyned together as Two several Worlds, at their Two Poles. But, by reason most Ladies take no delight in Philosophical Arguments, I separated some from the mentioned Observations, and caused them to go out by themselves, that I might express my Respects, in presenting to Them such Fancies as my Contemplations did afford. The First Part is Romancical; the Second, Philosophical; and the Third is meerly Fancy; or (as I may call it) Fantastical. And if (Noble Ladies)you should chance to take pleasure in reading these Fancies, I shall account my self a Happy Creatoress: If not, I must be content to live a Melancholly Life in my own World; which I cannot call a Poor World, if Poverty be only want of Gold, and Jewels: for, there is more Gold in it, than all the Chymists ever made; or, (as I verily believe) will ever be able to make. As for the Rocks of Diamonds, I wish, with all my Soul, they might be shared amongst my Noble Female Friends; upon which condition, I would willingly quit my Part: And of the Gold, I should desire only so much as might suffice to repair my Noble Lord and Husband’s Losses: for, I am not Covetous, but as Ambitious as ever any of my Sex was, is, or can be; which is the cause, That though I cannot be Henry the Fifth, or Charles the Second; yet, I will endeavour to be, Margaret the First: and, though I have neither Power, Time nor Occasion, to be a great Conqueror, like Alexander, or Cesar; yet, rather than not be Mistress of a World, since Fortune and the Fates would give me none, I have made One of my own. And thus, believing, or, at least, hoping, that no Creature can, or will, Envy me for this World of mine, I remain, Noble Ladies, Your Humble Servant, M. Newcastle. The Description of a New World, Called The Blazing-World. A Merchant travelling into a foreign Country, fell extreamly in Love with a young Lady; but being a stranger in that Nation, and beneath her, both in Birth and Wealth, he could have but little hopes of obtaining his desire; however his Love growing more and more vehement upon him, even to the slighting of all difficulties, he resolved at last to Steal her away; which he had the better opportunity to do, because her Father’s house was not far from the Sea, and she often using to gather shells upon the shore accompanied not with above two to three of her servants it encouraged him the more to execute his design. Thus coming one time with a little leight Vessel, not unlike a Packet-boat, mann’d with some few Sea-men, and well victualled, for fear of some accidents, which might perhaps retard their journey, to the place where she used to repair; he forced her away: But when he fancied himself the happiest man of the World, he proved to be the most unfortunate; for Heaven frowning at his Theft, raised such a Tempest, as they knew not what to do, or whither to steer their course; so that the Vessel, both by its own leightness, and the violent motion of the Wind, was carried as swift as an Arrow out of a Bow, towards the North-pole, and in a short time reached the Icy Sea, where the wind forced it amongst huge pieces of Ice; but being little, and leight, it did by the assistance and favour of the gods to this virtuous Lady, so turn and wind through those precipices, as if it had been guided by some experienced Pilot, and skilful Mariner: But alas! Those few men which were in it, not knowing whither they went, nor what was to be done in so strange an Adventure, and not being provided for so cold a Voyage, were all frozen to death; the young Lady onely, by the light of her Beauty, the heat of her Youth, and Protection of the Gods, remaining alive: Neither was it a wonder that the men did freeze to death; for they were not onely driven to the very end or point of the Pole of that World, but even to another Pole of another World, which joined close to it; so that the cold having a double strength at the conjunction of those two Poles, was insupportable: At last, the Boat still passing on, was forced into another World; for it is impossible to round this Worlds Globe from Pole to Pole, so as we do from East to West; because the Poles of the other World, joining to the Poles of this, do not allow any further passage to surround the World that way; but if any one arrives to either of these Poles, he is either forced to return, or to enter into another World: and lest you should scruple at it, and think, if it were thus, those that live at the Poles would either see two Suns at one time, or else they would never want the Sun’s light for six months together, as it is commonly believed: You must know, that each of these Worlds having its own Sun to enlighten it, they move each one in their peculiar Circles; which motion is so just and exact, that neither can hinder or obstruct the other; for they do not exceed their Tropicks: and although they should meet, yet we in this World cannot so well perceive them, by reason of the brightness of our Sun, which being nearer to us, obstructs the splendor of the Sun of the other World, they being too far off to be discerned by our optick perception, except we use very good Telescopes; by which, skilful Astronomers have often observed two or three Suns at once. But to return to the wandering Boat, and the distresed Lady; she seeing all the Men dead, found small comfort in life; their Bodies which were preserved all that while from putrefaction and stench, by the extremity of cold, began now to thaw, and corrupt; whereupon she having not strength enough to fling them over-board, was forced to remove out of her small Cabine, upon the deck, to avoid the nauseous smell; and finding the Boat swim between two plains of Ice, as a stream that runs betwixt two shores, at last perceived land, but covered all with Snow: from which came, walking upon the Ice, strange Creatures, in shape like Bears, only they went upright as men; those Creatures coming near the Boat, catched hold of it with their Paws, that served them instead of hands; some two or three of them entred first; and when they came out, the rest went in one after another; at last having viewed and observed all that was in the Boat, they spake to each other in a language which the Lady did not understand; and having carried her out of the Boat, sunk it, together with the dead men. The Lady now finding her self in so strange a place, and amongst such wonderful kind of Creatures, was extreamly strucken with fear, and could entertain no other Thoughts, but that every moment her life was to be a sacrifice to their cruelty; but those Bear-like Creatures, how terrible soever they appear’d to her sight, yet were they so far from exercising any cruelty upon her, that rather they shewed her all civility and kindness imaginable; for she being not able to go upon the Ice, by reason of its slipperiness, they took her up in their rough arms, and carried her into their City, where instead of Houses, they had Caves under ground; and as soon as they enter’d the City, both Males and Females, young and old, flockt together to see this Lady, holding up their Paws in admiration; at last having brought her into a certain large and spacious Cave, which they intended for her reception, they left her to the custody of the Females, who entertained her with all kindness and respect, and gave her such victuals as they used to eat; but seeing her Constitution neither agreed with the temper of that Climate, nor their Diet, they were resolved to carry her into another Island of a warmer temper; in which were men like Foxes, onely walking in an upright shape, who received their neighbours the Bear-men with great civility and Courtship, very much admiring this beauteous Lady; and having discoursed some while together, agreed at last to make her a Present to the Emperor of their World; to which end, after she had made some short stay in the same place, they brought her cross that Island to a large River, whose stream run smooth and clear, like Chrystal; in which were numerous Boats, much like our Fox-traps; in one whereof she was carried, some of the Bear- and Fox-men waiting on her; and as soon as they had crossed the River, they came into an Island where there were Men which had heads, beaks and feathers, like wild-Geese, onely they went in an upright shape, like the Bear-men and Fox-men: their rumps they carried between their legs, their wings were of the same length with their Bodies, and their tails of an indifferent size, trailing after them like a Ladie’s Garment; and after the Bear- and Fox-men had declared their intention and design to their Neighbours, the Geese- or Bird-men, some of them joined to the rest, and attended the Lady through that Island, till they came to another great and large River, where there was a preparation made of many Boats, much like Birds nests, onely of a bigger size; and having crost that River, they arrived into another Island, which was of a pleasant and mild temper, full of Woods and the Inhabitants thereof were Satyrs, who received both the Bear- Fox- and Bird men, with all respect and civility; and after some conferences (for they all understood each others language) some chief of the Satyrs joining to them, accompanied the Lady out of that Island to another River, wherein were many handsome and commodious Barges; and having crost that River, they entered into a large and spacious Kingdom, the men whereof were of a Grass-Green Complexion, who entertained them very kindly, and provided all conveniences for their further voyage: hitherto they had onely crost Rivers, but now they could not avoid the open Seas any longer; wherefore they made their Ships and tacklings ready to sail over into the Island, where the Emperor of the Blazing- world (for so it was call’d) kept his residence. Very good Navigators they were; and though they had no knowledg of the Load-stone, or Needle or pendulous Watches, yet (which was as serviceable to them) they had subtile observations, and great practice; in so much that they could not onely tell the depth of the Sea in every place, but where there were shelves of Sand, Rocks, and other obstructions to be avoided by skilful and experienced Sea-men: Besides, they were excellent Augurers, which skill they counted more necessary and beneficial then the use of Compasses, Cards, Watches, and the like; but, above the rest, they had an extraordinary Art, much to be taken notice of by Experimental Philosophers, and that was a certain Engin, which would draw in a great quantity of Air, and shoot forth Wind with a great force; this Engine in a calm, they placed behind their Ships, and in a storm, before; for it served against the raging waves, like Cannons against an hostile Army, or besieged Town; it would batter and beat the waves in pieces, were they as high as Steeples; and as soon as a breach was made, they forced their passage through, in spight even of the most furious wind, using two of those Engins at every Ship, one before, to beat off the waves, and another behind to drive it on; so that the artificial wind had the better of the natural; for, it had a greater advantage of the waves, then the natural of the Ships: the natural being above the face of the Water, could not without a down right motion enter or press into the Ships; whereas the artificial with a sideward-motion, did pierce into the bowels of the Waves: Moreover, it is to be observed, that in a great Tempest they would join their Ships in battel-aray: and when they feared Wind and Waves would be too strong for them, if they divided their Ships; they joined as many together as the compass or advantage of the places of the Liquid Element would give them leave. For, their Ships were so ingeniously contrived, that they could fasten them together as close as a Honey-comb, without waste of place; and being thus united, no Wind nor Waves were able to separate them. The Emperor’s Ships, were all of Gold; but the Merchants and Skippers, of Leather; the Golden Ships were not much heavier then ours of Wood, by reason they were neatly made, and required not such thickness, neither were they troubled with Pitch, Tar, Pumps, Guns, and the like, which make our Woodden-Ships very heavy; for though they were not all of a piece, yet they were so well sodder’d, that there was no fear of Leaks, Chinks, or Clefts; and as for Guns, there was no use of them, because they had no other enemies but the Winds: But the Leather Ships were not altogether so sure, although much leighter; besides, they were pitched to keep out Water. Having thus prepar’d, and order’d their Navy, they went on in despight of Calm or Storm: And though the Lady at first fancied her self in a very sad condition, and her mind was much tormented with doubts and fears, not knowing whether this strange Adventure would tend to her safety or destruction; yet she being withal of a generous spirit, and ready wit, considering what dangers she had past, and finding those sorts of men civil and diligent attendants to her, took courage, and endeavoured to learn their language; which after she had obtained so far, that partly by some words and signs she was able to apprehend their meaning, she was so far from being afraid of them, that she thought her self not onely safe, but very happy in their company: By which we may see, that Novelty discomposes the mind, but acquaintance settles it in peace and tranquillity. At last, having passed by several rich Islands and Kingdoms, they went towards Paradise, which was the seat of the Emperor; and coming in sight of it, rejoiced very much; the Lady at first could perceive nothing but high Rocks, which seemed to touch the Skies; and although they appear’d not of an equal heigth, yet they seemed to be all one piece, without partitions: but at last drawing nearer, she perceived a clift, which was a part of those Rocks, out of which she spied coming forth a great number of Boats, which afar off shewed like a company of Ants, marching one after another; the Boats appeared like the holes or partitions in a Honey-comb, and when joined together, stood as close; the men were of several Complexions, but none like any of our World; and when both the Boats and Ships met, they saluted and spake to each other very courteously; for there was but one language in all that World: nor no more but one Emperor, to whom they all submitted with the greatest duty and obedience, which made them live in a continued Peace and Happiness; not acquainted with Foreign Wars or Home-bred Insurrections. The Lady now being arrived at this place, was carried out of her Ship into one of those Boats, and conveighed through the same passage (for there was no other) into that part of the World where the Emperor did reside; which part was very pleasant, and of a mild temper: Within it self it was divided by a great number of vast and large Rivers, all ebbing and flowing, into several Islands of unequal distance from each other, which in most parts were as pleasant, healthful, rich, and fruitful, as Nature could make them; and, as I mentioned before, secure from all Foreign Invasions, by reason there was but one way to enter, and that like a Labyrinth, so winding and turning among the Rocks, that no other Vessels but small Boats, could pass, carrying not above three passengers at a time: On each side all along the narrow and winding River, there were several Cities, some of Marble, some of Alabaster, some of Agat, some of Amber, some of Coral, and some of other precious materials not known in our world; all which after the Lady had passed, she came to the Imperial City, named Paradise, which appeared in form like several Islands; for, Rivers did run betwixt every street, which together with the Bridges, whereof there was a great number, were all paved. The City it self was built of Gold; and their Architectures were noble, stately, and magnificent, not like our Modern, but like those in the Romans time; for, our Modern Buildings are like those Houses which Children use to make of Cards, one story above another, fitter for Birds, then Men; but theirs were more Large, and Broad, then high; the highest of them did not exceed two stories, besides those rooms that were under-ground, as Cellars, and other Offices. The Emperor’s Palace stood upon an indifferent ascent from the Imperial City; at the top of which ascent was a broad Arch, supported by several Pillars, which went round the Palace, and contained four of our English miles in compass: within the Arch stood the Emperor’s Guard, which consisted of several sorts of Men; at every half mile, was a Gate to enter, and every Gate was of a different fashion; the first, which allowed a passage from the Imperial City into the Palace, had on either hand a Cloyster, the outward part whereof stood upon Arches sustained by Pillars, but the inner part was close: Being entred through the Gate, the Palace it self appear’d in its middle like the Isle of a Church, a mile and a half long, and half a mile broad; the roof of it was all Arched, and rested upon Pillars, so artificially placed that a stranger would lose himself therein without a Guide; at the extream sides, that is, between the outward and inward part of the Cloyster, were Lodgings for Attendants; and in the midst of the Palace, the Emperor’s own Rooms; whose Lights were placed at the top of every one, because of the heat of the Sun: the Emperor’s appartment for State was no more inclosed then the rest; onely an Imperial Throne was in every appartment, of which the several adornments could not be perceived until one entered, because the Pillars were so just opposite to one another, that all the adornments could not be seen at one. The first part of the Palace was, as the Imperial City, all of Gold; and when it came to the Emperors appartment, it was so rich with Diamonds, Pearls, Rubies, and the like precious Stones, that it surpasses my skill to enumerate them all. Amongst the rest, the Imperial Room of State appear’d most magnificent; it was paved with green Diamonds (for there are in that World Diamonds of all Colours) so artificially, as it seemed but of one piece; the Pillars were set with Diamonds so close, and in such a manner, that they appear’d most Glorious to the sight; between every Pillar was a Bow or Arch of a certain sort of Diamonds, the like whereof our World does not afford; which being placed in every one of the Arches in several rows, seemed just like so many Rain-bows of several different colours. The roof of the Arches was of blew Diamonds, and in the midst thereof was a Carbuncle, which represented the Sun; and the Rising and Setting-Sun at the East and West-side of the Room were made of Rubies. Out of this Room there was a passage into the Emperor’s Bed-Chamber, the Walls whereof were of Jet, and the Floor of black Marble; the Roof was of Mother of Pearl, where the Moon and Blazing-Stars were represented by white Diamonds, and his Bed was made of Diamonds and Carbuncles. No sooner was the Lady brought before the Emperor, but he conceived her to be some Goddess, and offered to worship her; which she refused, telling him, (for by that time she had pretty well learned their Language) that although she came out of another world, yet was she but a mortal. At which the Emperor rejoycing, made her his Wife, and gave her an absolute power to rule and govern all that World as she pleased. But her subjects, who could hardly be perswaded to believe her mortal, tender’d her all the Veneration and Worship due to a Deity. Her Accoustrement after she was made Empress, was as followeth: On her head she wore a Cap of Pearl, and a Half-moon of Diamonds just before it; on the top of her Crown came spreading over a broad Carbuncle, cut in the form of the Sun; her Coat was of Pearl, mixt with blew Diamonds, and frindged with red ones; her Buskins and Sandals were of green Diamonds; In her left hand she held a Buckler, to signifie the Defence of her Dominions; which Buckler was made of that sort of Diamond as has several different Colours; and being cut and made in the form of an Arch, shewed like a Rain-bow; In her right hand she carried a Spear made of white Diamond, cut like the tail of a Blazing Star, which signified that she was ready to assault those that proved her Enemies. None was allowed to use or wear Gold but those of the Imperial Race, which were the onely Nobles of the State; nor durst any one wear Jewels but the Emperor, the Empress and their Eldest Son; notwithstanding that they had an infinite quantity both of Gold and precious Stones in that World; for they had larger extents of Gold, then our Arabian Sands; their precious Stones were Rocks, and their Diamonds of several Colours; they used no Coyn, but all their Traffick was by exchange of several Commodities. Their Priests and Governors were Princes of the Imperial Blood, and made Eunuches for that purpose; and as for the ordinary sort of men in that part of the World where the Emperor resided, they were of several Complexions; not white, black, tawny, olive or ash-coloured; but some appear’d of an Azure, some of a deep Purple, some of a Grass-green, some of a Scarlet, some of an Orange-colour, &c. Which Colours and Complexions, whether they were made by the bare reflection of light, without the assistance of small particles; or by the help of well-ranged and order’d Atoms; or by a continual agitation of little Globules; or by some pressing and re-acting motion, I am not able to determine. The rest of the Inhabitants of that World, were men of several different sorts, shapes, figures, dispositions, and humors, as I have already made mention, heretofore; some were Bear-men, some Worm-men, some Fish- or Mear-men, otherwise called Syrens; some Bird-men, some Fly-men, some Ant-men, some Geese-men, some Spider-men, some Lice-men, some Fox-men, some Ape-men, some Jack daw-men, some Magpie-men, some Parrot-men, some Satyrs, some Gyants, and many more, which I cannot all remember; and of these several sorts of men, each followed such a profession as was most proper for the nature of their Species, which the Empress encouraged them in, especially those that had applied themselves to the study of several Arts and Sciences; for they were as ingenious and witty in the invention of profitable and useful Arts, as we are in our world, nay, more; and to that end she erected Schools, and founded several Societies. The Bear-men were to be her Experimental Philosophers, the Bird-men her Astronomers, the Fly- Worm- and Fish-men her Natural Philosophers, the Ape-men her Chymists, the Satyrs her Galenick Physicians, the Fox-men her Politicians, the Spider- and Lice-men her Mathematicians, the Jackdaw- Magpie- and Parrot-men her Orators and Logicians, the Gyants her Architects, &c. But before all things, she having got a Soveraign power from the Emperor over all the World, desired to be informed both of the manner of their Religion and Government; and to that end she called the Priests and States men, to give her an account of either. Of the States men she enquired, first, Why they had so few Laws? To which they answered, That many Laws made many Divisions, which most commonly did breed Factions, and at last brake out into open Wars. Next, she asked, Why they preferred the Monarchical form of Government before any other? They answered, That as it was natural for one Body to have but one Head, so it was also natural for a Politick body to have but one Governor; and that a Common-wealth, which had many Governors was like a Monster with many Heads. Besides, said they, a Monarchy is a divine form of Government, and agrees most with our Religion: For as there is but one God, whom we all unanimously worship and adore with one Faith; so we are resolved to have but one Emperor, to whom we all submit with one obedience. Then the Empress seeing that the several sorts of her Subjects had each their Churches apart, asked the Priests, whether they were of several Religions? They answered her Majesty, That there was no more but one Religion in all that World, nor no diversity of opinions in that same Religion for though there were several sorts of men, yet had they all but one opinion concerning the Worship and Adoration of God. The Empress asked them, Whether they were Jews, Turks, or Christians? We do not know, said they, what Religions those are; but we do all unanimously acknowledg, worship and adore the Onely, Omnipotent, and Eternal God, with all reverence, submission, and duty. Again, the Empress enquired, Whether they had several Forms of Worship? They answered, No: For our Devotion and Worship consists onely in Prayers, which we frame according to our several Necessities, in Petitions, Humiliations, Thanksgiving, &c. Truly, replied the Empress, I thought you had been either Jews, or Turks, because I never perceived any Women in your Congregations: But what is the reason, you bar them from your religious Assemblies? It is not fit, said they, that Men and Women should be promiscuously together in time of Religious Worship; for their company hinders Devotion, and makes many, instead of praying to God, direct their Devotion to their Mistresses. But, asked the Empress, Have they no Congregation of their own, to perform the duties of Divine Worship, as well as Men? No, answered they: but they stay at home, and say their Prayers by themselves in their Closets. Then the Empress desir’d to know the reason why the Priests and Governors of their World were made Eunuchs? They answer’d, To keep them from Marriage: For Women and Children most commonly make disturbance both in Church and State. But, said she, Women and Children have no Employment in Church or State. ‘Tis true, answer’d they; but, although they are not admitted to publick Employments, yet are they so prevalent with their Husbands and Parents, that many times by their importunate perswasions, they cause as much, nay, more mischief secretly, then if they had the management of publick Affairs. The Empress having received an information of what concerned both Church and State, passed some time in viewing the Imperial Palace, where she admired much the skil and ingenuity of the Architects, and enquired of them, first, Why they built their Houses no higher then two stories from the Ground? They answered her Majesty, That the lower their Buildings were, the less were they subject either to the heat of the Sun, or Wind, Tempest, Decay, &c. Then she desired to know the reason, why they made them so thick? They answered, That, the thicker the Walls were, the warmer they were in Winter, the cooler in Summer; for their thickness kept out both the Cold and Heat. Lastly, she asked, Why they Arched their Roofs, and made so many Pillars? They replied, That Arches and Pillars, did not onely grace a Building very much, and caused it to appear Magnificent, but made it also firm and lasting. The Empress was very well satisfied with their answers; and after some time, when she thought that her new founded societies of the Vertuoso’s had made a good progress in the several Employments she had put them upon, she caused a Convocation first of the Bird-men, and commanded them to give her a true relation of the two Cœlestial Bodies, viz. the Sun and Moon, which they did with all the obedience and faithfulness befitting their duty. The Sun, as much as they could observe, they related to be a firm or solid Stone, of a vast bigness; of colour yellowish, and of an extraordinary splendor: But the Moon, they said, was of a whitish colour; and although she looked dim in the presence of the Sun, yet had she her own light, and was a shining body of her self, as might be perceived by her vigorous appearance in Moon-shiny-nights;

      personification, and very beautifully written.

    1. The odds of coming to a conclusion favorable to the industry are 3.6 times greater in research sponsored by the industry than in research sponsored by government and nonprofit groups,

      Although some researchers may not be aware that they are skewing their results, I think that this is a reflection of the bias and desire to produce a drug that will make the company a lot of money. Success in this business seems to be reflected based on the amount of money that is made from the drug rather or more stronger than the benefits that patients could experience. This system is so flawed, but it is also so hard to find the right solution. The production of new drugs is so important, so how do we take out this factor of financial benefit?

    1. Rivalinterpretationsandcompetingnormsmayemergeorrecede

      In my tourism and heritage class we talked about how culture is more subjective and has different meanings for members of the same culture. These differences have always been present in culture and fluctuate. I think globalization and technology may have made these 'rival interpretations' larger, as there is more excess to these competing perspective. Today everyone loves sharing their opinion on the internet and it can be easy to fall into stereotypical portrays of cultures.

    1. ies. They need to rely on their own internalized sense of good writing and to see their writing with their "own" eye

      As students we need to identify what's good writing to us. We can't go by what others may say or think about it. We have to make writing more personal and less about a set of rules we have to follow. Just let it flow.

    1. “But beyond the pleasure of Dreyer’s prose and authorial tone, I think there is something else at play with the popularity of his book,” he explained. “To put it as simply as possible, the man cares, and we need people who care right now.”

      I believe that the main reason why Benjamin Dreyer's Dreyer's English: an Utterly Correct Guide to Clarity and Style is so well-read, is that he's funny.

      The humor is dry as a paper board, for example:

      The NSA may be reading your emails and texts, but I’m not. If you prefer “Hi John” to “Hi, John,” you go right ahead.

      and:

      For the sake of clarity, we use hyphens to helpfully link up a pair or passel of words preceding and modifying a noun, as in: first-rate movie fifth-floor apartment middle-class morality nasty-looking restaurant all-you-can-eat buffet However, convention (a.k.a. tradition, a.k.a. consensus, a.k.a. it’s simply how it’s done, so don’t argue with it) allows for exceptions in some cases in which a misreading is unlikely, as in, say: real estate agent high school students And though you may, now that you’re staring at these constructions, wonder worryingly about the reality of that estate agent or the sobriety of those school students, I’d urge you to stop staring and move on. (Staring at words is always a bad idea. Stare at the word “the” for more than ten seconds and reality begins to recede.)

      Another thing, Dreyer is both funny and witty. Here's a bonus example of this:

      As a lexicographer friend once confided over sushi, the dictionary takes its cues from use: If writers don’t change things, the dictionary doesn’t change things. If you want your best-seller to be a bestseller, you have to help make that happen. If you want to play videogames rather than video games, go for it. I hope that makes you feel powerful. It should.

    1. This week I have also enjoyed making connections from previous readings, specifically the one about the grading system, with this weeks readings. I feel as though information privilege and how students strive for certain grades are very much correlated. I wonder if eliminating grades would help with the issue of information privilege in the fact that students may actually continue to explore their research topics after the completion of a class.

      I really, really love this connection! I think you might be right that if we design our courses and our learning around meaningful, authentic projects, we open ourselves up to greater exploration and risk-taking, especially when grades aren't part of the equation.

    1. Hedgehog & Fox You have emphasized ethical action, but a worry I always have about traditions which emphasize renunciation and detachment is what that means for politics and political engagement and the ability to effect any change. Now, both traditions would say the world is so far from perfect and everything is so impermanent that we’re never going to achieve a perfect political state of being. But is there a danger that if we’re attending too much to this kind of advice that we may just think all sorts of wrongs will go unrighted. Can you say something about how you see going beyond the ethical into a more political arena? Antonia Macaro Again, it’s a difficult one. Definitely there’s a tension in both traditions between detachment and action. The Stoics did have an ‘action streak’, as it were, which was about fulfilling your duties and doing what you could, given the circumstances you were in. But yes, it is definitely a tension and maybe this is the sense in which maybe I’m a bit more of an Aristotelian. I think in the end it’s the Serenity Prayer, which is about having the courage to change things that you can change and the serenity to accept the ones that you can’t change and the wisdom to know the difference, which is actually very hard to do. But I think it’s certainly worth trying to change things in the world that you think is possible to change, maybe sometimes even if you don’t think it’s possible to change. Some things may be worth fighting for anyway. It’s a question of finding a balance between that and not getting too attached to things. I suspect that that balance may be a personal, individual choice.
    1. "if you understand this story then you will be liberated of all worries and fears".

      Machina, there is a huge clue that, if you notice it and realize the implications, could transform your life into that vision of liberation. It is that you imagine this claim in the blog post. It is not there. This is your fantasy, and you don't know the difference between your fantasy and understanding and reality. The first step toward transformation is recognizing our existent condition, -- we must start from where we are, not where we imagine or think we should be -- that we live and believe in fantasies. Once we admit that, we then develop an appetite for reality. That appetite is, perhaps, natural, but has been conditioned out of most of us. Or it is not natural, I don't know for sure. I just know what happens when we honor and amplify it.

      So first, baby step: he did not claim what you said.

      You are trapped by your belief in "correct." To be useful, a story or interpretation or even understanding does not need to be "correct." It is more generally accurate to say that no story or interpretation is "truth." What is a bit deeper, perhaps, than what he wrote is that if one is in a position from which one understands the story, one is already liberated. The story is pointing to something. But it is not the story causing what is pointed to. The entire dualist construction (cause and effect, right and wrong, yes and no, is confronted by koans, the point of a koan is to create a mind-failure, a breakdown of the traps we have created. Looking at a koan and taking it as some sort of scientific reality is completely missing the point, and abusing it. It's a test. Koans are actually used to measure progress in training. Outside of training, they are meaningless except as others who have experience the same may recognize it in the koans. And many Buddhists intellectualize the koans and explain them, missing the point themselves, treating them as some sort of religious dogma. "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." or they talk about the "Stink of Zen."

    2. https://www.lionsroar.com/what-is-your-body-july-2013/ I can't help but feel like the guy says that there is no physical reality and that it's all just in your mind and that science proves it.

      It's great that you are questioning what you read, Machina, but not great that you are not aware of your own processes and what keeps you from understanding the material on that site. What does the "guy" say? You wrote about what you "feel," but is not a feeling, it is a thought you invented or that fell upon you in reaction to what you read, the "feeling" part would be an emotional reaction -- a body sense -- in response to it

      To understand what is on that page, will, for most people, take at least a few years of practice of what they are talking about. (For those with the experience, it is all obvious.) I can say this for sure to you: the guy did not say what you think. The page is not saying "there is no physical reality." What Buddhism works with is what we actually experience, and we experience through the senses and the mind. What we sense and our awareness are phenomena of the mind, not reality itself, so Buddhism is silent on the issue of "physical reality," except \that it focuses on actual experience, which is a kind of physical reality. But it is all the mind. And the same set of experiences and understandings can be viewed as "it is all physical reality." The paradoxes and difficulties arise from the idea of two realities: physical and mental (or "spiritual"). "There is only one reality" is also a story, and imagination, but it happens to be a very useful one. Buddhist training is about attending to what is present, not trying to "figure it out." No "belief" is required.

      To be sure, the author of that page (and possibly the source on Abhidharma) wrote something you could take as denying physical reality. In a more complete understanding of Buddhism, denial and affirmation become one, and one way of understanding that is dialectical. I.e., it is A and it is not-A, and deep understanding arises -- in practice and experience -- when one can hold opposites, seeing the difference and the unity. Now, someone can tell you this and it can be meaningless, because to understand it requires having gone through the process. That can take years, though some degree of awakening can occur in a flash. Don't believe it till you see it! However, Ariel31459 has pointed to the value of respecting others. Respect, not worship. Test what is said, but, of course, you must first understand what is to be tested! If you have not understood it, at least to be clear about what practice is being recommended, you may otherwise create a test that is doomed to failure.

    1. failure to produce theory as we know it

      The key phrase here is "as we know it," and is in that respect I think misleading. As I understand it (and I may be wrong), the intention was never to produce theory as we know it now, but to allow the aesthetic and the theoretical to inter-implicate and generate, no? For poesia and theoria to coller in an unsanctioned but passionate embrace so that we can see how the aesthetic theorizes and theory aestheticizes. Loy's poetry is theory, her practice a theory of the avant-garde/en dehors garde. Why not let it teach us how to think it?

  10. Mar 2019
    1. To reduce music history to a pageant of masters is, at bottom, lazy. We stick with the known in order to avoid the hard work of exploring the unknown.

      It is natural for humans to pursue something beautiful, while we should not pursue beauty blindly, intentionally ignoring the dirties under the beautiful skin. No matter the music history or the human history, what we are learning in the school is based on the textbooks that have been edited by some groups of scholars, who only display to us what they want us to know. Most people don’t question the truth of the history, just accepting the “knowledge”, which is, as the author says, a lazy behavior.

      Looking back on the music history, most common people may immediately think of Beethoven or Chopin. Past musicians the public are most familiar with usually come to be white males. The adulation of white-male hero in the music circle makes laymen only know to praise their talent, forgetting to doubt why all these masterpieces were written by white men. Where are women? Where are the black?

      Is “the known” we “stick to” real? Or the “pageant” in music is a fake, a self-recreation of white males. It reminds me of a best-selling book last year, Bad Blood by John Carreyrou. The young, charismatic founder Elizabeth Holmes makes up a fantastic background and draws a bright future for her startup in Silicon Valley, Theranos. A number of investors are attracted by the gorgeous veil of Theranos, by the beautiful appearance of Holmes. Nobody realizes it is an elaborated lie knitted by Homes, till the Wall Street Journal’s John Carreyrou reveals the fraud.

      It is hard to awaken a person who is pretending to be asleep. Some people are only willing to see what they think is correct, living in a world which is created for them, having no awareness to question the truth of their surroundings, unwilling to explore the unknown. Perhaps they enjoy being the role as Truman.

    1. Although all humans may feel guilty from time to time, a person ought to avoid fully embracing him- or herself as inherently corrupt, as this attitude only invites further misbehavior.

      I don't know how I feel about this analysis. For a lot of the article, the play is being treated like an actual play with actual themes: oh, this is about guilt, moral corruption and this and that and whatever. The analysis reminds me of something to do with Kafka's The Trial, about a man being incarcerated for a crime that they're not even disclosing to him. But Kafka was trying to make a point about guilt there. I don't reckon that Pinter's doing the same. I believe that Pinter's making a point about absurdity, about the lack of meaning even in a play, and he doesn't have much regard for other themes. It calls to mind this (mildly relevant) review I read about Joyce's Finnegans Wake: "I see what Joyce is doing; he is fucking around with words and having a blast, but I don’t want any part of it." See, I don't think we can analyse The Birthday Party as we can other plays, just like one can't analyse Joyce as one can other novels.

    1. "Polman's corporate social responsibility agenda certainly did gripe with a number of investors and so we shall watch with interest to see if continuity persists in this arena; we would expect evolution rather than revolution though," Clive Black, the head of research at UK stockbrokers Shore Capital, says. Jefferies' Deboo agrees there will be some changes – and argues Jope should look to do so. "My logic would be it would be hard not to be less sustainability-focused than Polman. Polman was the absolute high priest. My sense of Jope is that he comes across as this sort of, straight-up, affable guy, who looks to me to be more of a commercial pragmatist. My sense is you'll probably see it dialled down. That's my instinct," Deboo says. "It may be my personal prejudice but I think it had gone too far anyway. Not only was it alienating shareholders but I also think the marketing execution at Unilever had become far too leaden and earnest and purpose-driven. The Sustainable Living Plan was squeezing the joy out of the marketing, in my view. I would hope that Jope would dial that back a bit."

      This is one of the first things I've seen that makes me question Unilever. In 2018, a new CEO took over, and now it seems there may be some doubt about whether or not he continues to keep Unilever as sustainable as it was. I don't think it changes the brands reputation to most but it does introduce questions that might lower some peoples trust.

    1. After a full day of teaching at Boston College, Karen Arnold had to find time to read her students’ contributions to an online discussion board. Each was required to write at least one post, and, as usual, they seemed to have waited to do it until the night before the deadline. “They would just blather something,” said Arnold, who teaches higher education and educational administration. “They didn’t have a conversation. It was more like a hoop-jumping exercise.” That was around 2008, and Arnold has avoided assigning online discussions ever since. Student and instructor at Bronx Community College (Photo by Ryan Brenizer) Like other faculty with memories of failed experiments such as these, she’s pushing back against the widespread notion that technology can necessarily improve teaching and cut costs. “We are fooling ourselves that we’re getting more efficient,” she said. Related: MOOC bandwagon shows signs of slowing down It’s been a high-stakes bet. Universities and colleges are marketing themselves to tech-savvy teenagers while promising higher productivity and financial savings. They will pour $10.4 billion into education technology this year, according to the Center for Digital Education, from computers to in-class gadgets such as digital projectors and wireless “clickers” that let students answer questions electronically. “We are fooling ourselves that we’re getting more efficient.” Karen Arnold, Boston College But professors say they don’t have enough help to use this technology effectively, haven’t seen results from it, and fear that the cost savings administrators keep insisting that technology will bring could mean their own careers are on the line. That’s left many in the university ranks rolling their eyes when the next “innovation” pops up. “We’ve been hearing over the last four or five years that technology is going to reduce costs, increase quality and increase access,” said Diane Harley, director of the Higher Education in the Digital Age project at University of California, Berkeley. She doesn’t think it can do all three of those things. “I always say, pick two.” Not that professors have completely resisted the trend. Nearly 75 percent have tried a new technology in their classes in the past year, according to a survey of 1,600 of them by Faculty Focus, a newsletter that shares effective teaching practices. Yet 34 percent said keeping up with technology was either “moderately” or “very” problematic. Related: As online courses expand, so do questions about ownership One of the most common complaints from faculty is that much of this technology creates more work, not less, a survey of 42 professors by David R. Johnson, a sociology researcher at Rice University, found. One of the reasons for this inefficiency is that professors adopt educational technology from companies that market it to them directly, even when their universities aren’t equipped to troubleshoot or upgrade it, said Gary W. Matkin, dean of continuing education, distance learning, and summer session at the University of California, Irvine. Then, when something even better comes along, faculty and universities chase after that. “It produces this technology war,” said Matkin. He thinks more universities will eventually switch to the model used by many corporations in which only certain technology is allowed. That way they’ll be better able to manage it — and track the results. Related: Want higher-ed reform? You may be surprised where you’ll find it Many schools have used this model to adopt the wireless clickers — or “student response systems” — in large classrooms. Allowing students to use the TV remote-style clickers to collectively answer questions can keep them engaged in lecture classes, according to a study at Canisius College, which found that student grades increased by 4.7 percent in classes that used clickers. But the technology’s impact goes only so far. In another study released this year, by Butler University professor Juan Pablo Rodriquez Prieto, language students who took clicker-based quizzes performed about 4.5 percent worse than classmates who used pencil and paper. Clare O’Connor, a Boston College biology professor who teaches several large classes and uses clickers regularly, agrees that they have limitations. She doesn’t use them for quizzes or tests, she said. “I like students to have the opportunities to change their answers,” she said. “If students have to answer when a question appears on the screen, you eliminate the possibility of more reflective answers.” One way schools have tried to lower the cost of education is by using another kind of technology: online courses. Yet even after teaching English online for 15 years, Wright State University-Lake Campus’ Martin Kich believes in-person courses offer students far more. Related: Colleges take cues from private business to improve their customer service He said he has to assign what he calls “busy work” to online classes simply to check that students are completing assignments, since there’s no opportunity to gather and discuss. “Academically, they are very suspect,” Kich said of online courses. Instead of lectures, online courses often use PowerPoint to present material. But studies have found that students, when given the ability to see lectures via PowerPoint — both online and in person — slack on doing their own assigned reading. “Students perceive the teachers will highlight all of the material worth considering in the textbook,” University of Central Missouri professor Thomas M. Mitchell wrote in a study of the use of PowerPoint in classes. “Unfortunately, students accept this efficient and time-saving system as a normal way of learning and disregard reading as an effective method of acquiring information.” As for Arnold, she abandoned discussion boards until her university upgraded to Canvas — an online learning management system — and encouraged professors to use it starting this year. After getting student feedback, she assigned two students to moderate the discussion board each week, filling it with questions that would drive conversation. At the start of class, the two students recap the results, saving Arnold the need to keep daily tabs on the board. “The good and bad thing about technology is it will do anything,” she said. But “you have to have time at the expense of other things you could be doing to figure it out.”   This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news website focused on inequality and innovation in education. This article was originally published on The Heching Report and authored by Ryan Derousseau. Read the original article. Spread the love

      Technology has been found to be more of a hindrance in higher education that a help. Professors claim that students are simply doing the minimal amount of work to get by and online discussions are inefficient. This is making our education system less engaging and with less learning.

    1. I am creating and envisioning a possibility that others may not see or may not have the confidence to direct. That possibility is going to open so many doors for me.

      This is an incredible perspective to take on interdisciplinary! I think it's easy as a student to fall into a mindset of, "I chose this because my program wasn't offered" and I don't think enough of us appreciate this incredible education we are receiving and all the possibilities it can offer us.

    1. There is a lot of complexity in where one’s free speech ends and another’s begins. What if activismmeans banning speech you do not want to hear? What would be the short term and lasting implications ifall our demands for silencing voices and removing symbols we find offensive were totally met? How canwe help students understand the complexity of issues surrounding free speech?

      In my opinion these are groundbreaking questions that need to be given more attention to in the context of student activism. One forgets at times that free speech extends to those who have a different opinion and therefore should not be barred from being heard. Additionally, as the author discusses in the above paragraphs, it is important to deliberate and discuss opposing views rather than only listening to one sides opinion. A lot of the time in our society we do not truly discuss everything going on, but only focus on parts of what is going on and I do not think that operating in that way will ever create full social change that is beneficial. Rather, doing so creates a fragmented picture for an audience that may or may not understand the topic at hand.

    1. The presence of dry midtropospheric air may thus serve to help permit the buildup of buoyant energy for subsequent episodes of deep convection, such as associated with the onset of the Madden–Julian oscillation.

      Can we think it is a connection between shallow convection and deep convection?

    1. What is surprising about The Birthday Party is that, even if it leaves much unexplained, it still boasts familiar landmarks. It has a traditional three-act structure. It is also full of mystery and suspense.

      I think this is key to the strangeness of The Birthday Party: it initially looks familiar. We have three acts, we have these hints of mystery and suspense, which, according to the article, were popular genres at the time. Maybe it's a bit like the Uncanny Valley effect: we see something that we should recognise as familiar, but there's just something a little bit off about it that we can't identify. Perhaps it was part of Pinter's goal to venture outside the box while staying in the box, if you catch my drift.

    1. n essence, it is a collectiveunderstanding of the way the world works, shared by members of a group and passed downfrom one generation to the next.

      Culture can be a very hard word to define. People of all races, ethnicities, and religions may view "culture" in a different way. I think to fully be able to respect someone, you should at least know how they view things. I personally would love to travel, but I am afraid that some people would make fun of me because I don't communicate really well. Knowing me and some of my habits, I would accidentally offend someone without any intention of doing so. As we have learned in Spanish, there are totally different ways of greeting people in different countries.

    2. Individualists are more likely to define themselves interms of an independent self. This means that people see themselves as A) being a uniqueindividual with a stable collection of personal traits, and B) that these traits drive behavior.

      According to the article Independent self are individuals are more likely to define themselves in terms of independent self. this means that people see themselves as being unique individual with a stable collection of personal traits, and that these traits drive behavior. I think that a lot of people think that they know who they really are but in reality they're confused inside. Some people put on fronts for society because of what they say and for their parents because their parents "knew what was best for them". Not knowing or understanding who you really are may (or can) cause confusion or depression or other serious issues. We can try to stop this types of issues by letting children explore and have autonomy at an early age letting them make decisions on there on.

    1. The change of clothes had, some philosophers will say, muchto do with it. Vain trifles as they seem, clothes have, they say, moreimportant offices than merely to keep us warm. They change our view ofthe world and the world's view of us. For example, when Captain Bartolussaw Orlando's skirt, he had an awning stretched for her immediately,pressed her to take another slice of beef, and invited her to go ashorewith him in the long-boat. These compliments would certainly not havebeen paid her had her skirts, instead of flowing, been cut tight to herlegs in the fashion of breeches. And when we are paid compliments, itbehoves us to make some return. Orlando curtseyed; she complied; sheflattered the good man's humours as she would not have done had his neatbreeches been a woman's skirts, and his braided coat a woman's satinbodice. Thus, there is much to support the view that it is clothes thatwear us and not we them; we may make them take the mould of arm orbreast, but they mould our hearts, our brains, our tongues to theirliking.

      The narrator suggests that much of Orlando's change in character had to do with the change in her clothes, which affect how other perceive Orlando, and also how Orlando perceives herself. This ties into something I learned in sociology called the looking glass self, which is the idea that our sense of self develops as a reflection of the way we think others view us. Orlando did not consiously decide to act more feminine, but as others see her, in her dress and with her appearances, as a woman, she subconsciously changes her manners to reflect that. What does this show about how appearances and the physical aspects of a person affect how other people received him/her? In addition, although she had previously not felt very changed, in becoming a woman from man, as she meets more and more people, and socializes, she realizes that she does act more as a woman. I think this has something to do with the expectations that the society has of women, and how despite Orlando's mindset, she feels compelled to conform to it. The opinions of others and societal norms also influence how people act.

    1. Vannevar Bush’s Memex.

      Vannevar Bush's Memex is also known as a collective memory machine that he hoped would turn the world of information into use for human good and understanding. Bush's "As We May Think" (Atlantic, July, 1945), was mentioned a lot in graduate school.

    1. Chemical bonds form when electrons can be simultaneously close to two or more nuclei, but beyond this, there is no simple, easily understood theory that would not only explain why atoms bind together to form molecules, but would also predict the three-dimensional structures of the resulting compounds as well as the energies and other properties of the bonds themselves. Unfortunately, no one theory exists that accomplishes these goals in a satisfactory way for all of the many categories of compounds that are known. Moreover, it seems likely that if such a theory does ever come into being, it will be far from simple. When we are faced with a scientific problem of this complexity, experience has shown that it is often more useful to concentrate instead on developing models. A scientific model is something like a theory in that it should be able to explain observed phenomena and to make useful predictions. But whereas a theory can be discredited by a single contradictory case, a model can be useful even if it does not encompass all instances of the phenomena it attempts to explain. We do not even require that a model be a credible representation of reality; all we ask is that be able to explain the behavior of those cases to which it is applicable in terms that are consistent with the model itself. An example of a model that you may already know about is the kinetic molecular theory of gases. Despite its name, this is really a model (at least at the level that beginning students use it) because it does not even try to explain the observed behavior of real gases. Nevertheless, it serves as a tool for developing our understanding of gases, and as a starting point for more elaborate treatments. Given the extraordinary variety of ways in which atoms combine into aggregates, it should come as no surprise that a number of useful bonding models have been developed. Most of them apply only to certain classes of compounds, or attempt to explain only a restricted range of phenomena. In this section we will provide brief descriptions of some of the bonding models; the more important of these will be treated in much more detail in later parts of this chapter. Ionic Bonding Ever since the discovery early in the 19th century that solutions of salts and other electrolytes conduct electric current, there has been general agreement that the forces that hold atoms together must be electrical in nature. Electrolytic solutions contain ions having opposite electrical charges, opposite charges attract, so perhaps the substances from which these ions come consist of positive and negatively charged atoms held together by electrostatic attraction. It turns out that this is not true generally, but a model built on this assumption does a fairly good job of explaining a rather small but important class of compounds that are called ionic solids. The most well known example of such a compound is sodium chloride, which consists of two interpenetrating lattices of Na+ and Cl– ions arranged in such as way that every ion of one type is surrounded (in three dimensional space) by six ions of opposite charge. The main limitation of this model is that it applies really well only to the small class of solids composed of Group 1 and 2 elements with highly electronegative elements such as the halogens. Although compounds such as CuCl2 dissociate into ions when they dissolve in water, the fundamental units making up the solid are more like polymeric chains of covalently-bound CuCl2 molecules that have little ionic character. According to the ionic electrostatic model, solids such as NaCl consist of positive and negative ions arranged in a crystal lattice. Each ion is attracted to neighboring ions of opposite charge, and is repelled by ions of like charge; this combination of attractions and repulsions, acting in all directions, causes the ion to be tightly fixed in its own location in the crystal lattice. Since electrostatic forces are nondirectional, the structure of an ionic solid is determined purely by geometry: two kinds of ions, each with its own radius, will fall into whatever repeating pattern will achieve the lowest possible potential energy. Surprisingly, there are only a small number of possible structures Covalent Bonding This model originated with the theory developed by G.N. Lewis in 1916, and it remains the most widely-used model of chemical bonding. The essential element s of this model can best be understood by examining the simplest possible molecule. This is the hydrogen molecule ion H2+, which consists of two nuclei and one electron. First, however, think what would happen if we tried to make the even simpler molecule H22+. Since this would consist only of two protons whose electrostatic charges would repel each other at all distances, it is clear that such a molecule cannot exist; something more than two nuclei are required for bonding to occur. In the hydrogen molecule ion H2+ we have a third particle, an electron. The effect of this electron will depend on its location with respect to the two nuclei. If the electron is in the space between the two nuclei, it will attract both protons toward itself, and thus toward each other. If the total attraction energy exceeds the internuclear repulsion, there will be a net bonding effect and the molecule will be stable. If, on the other hand, the electron is off to one side, it will attract both nuclei, but it will attract the closer one much more strongly, owing to the inverse-square nature of Coulomb's law. As a consequence, the electron will now help the electrostatic repulsion to push the two nuclei apart. We see, then, that the electron is an essential component of a chemical bond, but that it must be in the right place: between the two nuclei. Coulomb's law can be used to calculate the forces experienced by the two nuclei for various positions of the electron. This allows us to define two regions of space about the nuclei, as shown in the figure. One region, the binding region, depicts locations at which the electron exerts a net binding effect on the new nuclei. Outside of this, in the antibinding region, the electron will actually work against binding. This simple picture illustrates the number one rule of chemical bonding: chemical bonds form when electrons can be simultaneously close to two or more nuclei. It should be pointed out that this principle applies also to the ionic model; as will be explained later in this chapter, the electron that is "lost" by a positive ion ends up being closer to more nuclei (including the one from whose electron cloud it came) in the compound. The polar covalent model: A purely covalent bond can only be guaranteed when the electronegativities (electron-attracting powers) of the two atoms are identical. When atoms having different electronegativities are joined, the electrons shared between them will be displaced toward the more electronegative atom, conferring a polarity on the bond which can be described in terms of percent ionic character. The polar covalent model is thus an generalization of covalent bonding to include a very wide range of behavior. The Coulombic model: This is an extension of the ionic model to compounds that are ordinarily considered to be non-ionic. Combined hydrogen is always considered to exist as the hydride ion H–, so that methane can be treated as if it were C4+ H–4. This is not as bizarre as it might seem at first if you recall that the proton has almost no significant size, so that it is essentially embedded in an electron pair when it is joined to another atom in a covalent bond. This model, which is not as well known as it deserves to be, has considerable predictive power, both as to bond energies and structures. The VSEPR model: The "valence shell electron repulsion" model is not so much a model of chemical bonding as a scheme for explaining the shapes of molecules. It is based on the quantum mechanical view that bonds represent electron clouds- physical regions of negative electric charge that repel each other and thus try to stay as far apart as possible. Summary The covalent bond is formed when two atoms are able to share electrons: whereas the ionic bond is formed when the "sharing" is so unequal that an electron from atom A is completely lost to atom B, resulting in a pair of ions: The two extremes of electron sharing represented by the covalent and ionic models appear to be generally consistent with the observed properties of molecular and ionic solids and liquids. But does this mean that there are really two kinds of chemical bonds, ionic and covalent? Contributors Stephen Lower, Professor Emeritus (Simon Fraser U.) Chem1 Virtual Textbook   /*<![CDATA[*/ $(function() { if(!window['autoDefinitionList']){ window['autoDefinitionList'] = true; $('dl').find('dt').on('click', function() { $(this).next().toggle('350'); }); } });/*]]>*/ /*<![CDATA[*/ var front = "auto"; if(front=="auto"){ front = "3.2: Chemical Bonds"; if(front.includes(":")){ front = front.split(":")[0]; if(front.includes(".")){ front = front.split("."); front = front.map((int)=>int.includes("0")?parseInt(int,10):int).join("."); } front+="."; } else { front = ""; } } front = front.replace(/_/g," "); MathJaxConfig = { TeX: { equationNumbers: { autoNumber: "all", formatNumber: function (n) { if(false){ return front + (Number(n)+false); } else{return front + n; } } }, Macros: { PageIndex: ["{"+front+" #1}",1], test: ["{"+front+" #1}",1] }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } } } }; MathJax.Hub.Config(MathJaxConfig); /*]]>*/ /*<![CDATA[*/window.addEventListener('load', function(){$('iframe').iFrameResize({warningTimeout:0});})/*]]>*/ Back to top 3.1: Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Water 3.3: Representing Compounds: Chemical Formulas and Molecular Models Recommended articles There are no recommended articles. 3.1: Hydrogen, Oxygen, and WaterUnder construction3.3: Representing Compounds: Chemical Formulas and Molecular ModelsA chemical formula is a format used to express the structure of atoms. The formula tells which elements and how many of each element are present in a...3.4: An Atomic-Level Perspective of Elements and CompoundsMetals (particularly those in groups 1 and 2) tend to lose the number of electrons that would leave them with the same number of electrons as in the p...3.5: Ionic Compounds: Formulas and NamesChemists use nomenclature rules to clearly name compounds. Ionic and molecular compounds are named using somewhat-different methods. Binary ionic comp...3.6: Molecular Compounds: Formulas and NamesMolecular compounds can form compounds with different ratios of their elements, so prefixes are used to specify the numbers of atoms of each element i... Article type Topic Show TOC no Tags This page has no tags. © Copyright 2019 Chemistry LibreTexts Powered by MindTouch ® The LibreTexts libraries are Powered by MindTouch® and are supported by the Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program, and Merlot. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. Unless otherwise noted, LibreTexts content is licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Have questions or comments? For more information contact us at info@libretexts.org or check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. /*<![CDATA[*/ MathJax.Hub.Config({ jax: ["input/TeX","input/MathML","output/SVG"], extensions: ["tex2jax.js","mml2jax.js","MathMenu.js","MathZoom.js"], TeX: { extensions: ["autobold.js","mhchem.js","color.js","cancel.js", "AMSmath.js","AMSsymbols.js","noErrors.js","noUndefined.js"] }, "HTML-CSS": { linebreaks: { automatic: true , width: "90%"}, scale: 90, mtextFontInherit: false}, menuSettings: { zscale: "150%", zoom: "Double-Click" }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }}); /*]]>*/ 000000

      Chemical bonds

    1. about how we as educators think about inequality, and how our framings impact our choices.

      This could be a powerful exercise with faculty not just relating to technology, but to all areas where we feel there are inequalities. One issue that often comes up in our small K-12 school is an "us vs. them" attitude between the high school and elementary staff. The elementary staff feels like the high school gets more opportunities, and they may be right. I wonder if doing a CIQ with both sets of staff around the way they view inequality within our school and how it frames their thinking would be eye-opening. We have a healthy staff and good relationships in general, but things do creep up sometimes.

    1. The camera hound of the future wears on his forehead a lump a little larger than a walnut. It takes pictures 3 millimeters square, later to be projected or enlarged, which after all involves only a factor of 10 beyond present practice. The lens is of universal focus, down to any distance accommodated by the unaided eye, simply because it is of short focal length. There is a built-in photocell on the walnut such as we now have on at least one camera, which automatically adjusts exposure for a wide range of illumination. There is film in the walnut for a hundred exposures, and the spring for operating its shutter and shifting its film is wound once for all when the film clip is inserted. It produces its result in full color.

      He must have had a time machine to look into the future. Body cams and the mobile phone have this covered.

    2. A record if it is to be useful to science, must be continuously extended, it must be stored, and above all it must be consulted. Today we make the record conventionally by writing and photography, followed by printing; but we also record on film, on wax disks, and on magnetic wires.

      I think Bush was on to something. Ha!

    1. the standards are framed around what educators see as critical skills and behaviors for students now and in the future

      Sorry, but I chuckled at this line, because how can we possibly have standards for future technology skills? We may well be in driverless cars sooner than we think. I agree that having standards for skills needed now is imperative, yet as soon as they are determined, they may be out of date by the time they are agreed upon and published. Just my two cents on this! LM

    1. t is not to be expected that this process should be strictlypursued before every moral judgment or every legislative orjudicial operation. But it can be always kept in view; andthe nearer the process actually pursued on these occasionscome to it, the nearer they will come to exactness

      I find this point very interesting. Often we may just go through the motions of life and not take the time to address what really is happening as a result of our actions. By keeping the process at least in our heads we are able to further think through our actions and their effects. I think this is something that is very difficult to do with the speed of life in today's world and the way we have access to many things at the tip of our fingers.

    2. Repeat the above process with respect to each personwhose interests appear to be concerned; and then sum theresults. If this balance is on the side of pleasure, that is theover-all good tendency of the act with respect to the interestsof the community; if on the side of pain, its over-all badtendency.

      I find this idea to be quite interesting because the philosophies we have studied thus far haven't taken a summing approach in determining whether an action is good or bad. I think that many actions can be perceived as both good and bad depending on who is judging the action, so I like this philosophy's idea of summing the values of the pleasure and pains an action causes for all inflicted people. I also like how this allows for someone to perceive an action different from what the community as a whole may perceive it. However, I can't help but believe that comparing the value of one person's pleasure with another person's pain can be difficult at times.

    1. gorgeous

      I don't think we should focus on the beauty of someone as our introduction here. We want to show women throughout the course that they can fall in love with themselves. Not externally, internally.

      I think the term gorgeous, though encouraging and positive, may be taken as a face value (common with society) than our actual intentions.

      I am thinking we introduce this one as the free course as a note to our community, then moving forward with Welcome, Name.

      This note can start of as - For those who seek growth...

      Or something along those lines.

    1. By their first birthday, children can distinguish faces by gender. By their second birthday,they can label others’ gender and even sort objects into gender-typed categories. By the thirdbirthday, children can consistently identify their own gender

      Wow. I am floored by this whole paragraph but I chose to only talk about this part. I never realized how much kids are actually taught about gender. I feel as though parenting styles may have something to do with this though. I have worked with a lot of children growing up, as I am a nanny. I've had 3 different boy/girl sibling pairings and, thinking back, I see different patterns of gender recognition. The first 2 were 5 and 6 when i started babysitting them and they were taught that she's a girl and he's a boy but they didn't know what that meant. When they were 7 and 8, they started telling me that they could no longer take a bath together because he's a boy and she's a girl and they couldn't look at each other's parts. My point with this is that they knew what gender was but didn't know the true differences until later. Another pairing was 4 and 5 when i started babysitting them. These two knew immediately that boys and girls are different because of their parts and that they couldn't look at each other naked because that's wrong. They each had their toys to play with and the boy wouldn't play with girl toys and the girl wouldn't play with boy toys. The two I babysit now are a little different in age as they are 4 and 1. The 4 year old is a very smart boy but he does not see gender. He went into the bathroom and left the door open and told me to come in there. He didn't understand that it's 'wrong' for me to do that. He just wanted to talk. He changes his younger sister and he plays just like he would with any other person with anything he wants to play with, boy toys or girl toys. What I mean to say with all of this is that i think that how children are parented or taught plays a huge role in when they identify gender and understand gender differences. I don't believe that we can just look at their age to know how much they understand about gender.

    1. video
      • Read- questioning, locating, synthesizing, and communicating information duing online problem based reading tasks
      • Changing nature of literacy- new literacies are central to civic, economic and personal participation in a globalized community and, as a result, the education of all students-constantly thinking about and problematizing information we are teaching our students
      • the internet as a text- the use of internet in schools extends the boundaries of literature/ transforms instructional practices
      • Questioning- can students restate questions in their own words? can they form keywords from this question? can they understand when they have gotten all the information they need?
      • Locating- using different search engines, using internal search engines (search engine within a website), how to find infrmation on a webpage, hot to ignore information they don't need to think about
      • Evaluate- know when information meets their needs, know how to identify an author or publisher of online information, judge an author's authority on a subject, can see how an author supports ther argument
      • Synthesize- know how to select and construct the information they need, know which information to ignore while reading, know how images and numbers help contruct meaning, know when they have the answer
      • Communicate- know how to select the most appropriate communication tool for their purpose, know what information to submit, and what to leave out, share all information needed to completely answer the question
      • Scaffolding online readers- Google Forms, Blogger or EDUblogs, Diigo, Google Custom Search Engine
      • Why is this important? Students that need it the most may be receiving it the least, little known about differences between online and offline reading, authentic, web-based learning assessments
    1. For example, in developed countries children begin school around 5 or 6 years old, but in developing countries, like Nigeria, children often enter school at an advanced age, if at all (Huebler, 2005; United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization [UNESCO], 2013).

      How do you think differences like these between countries affect the way people from different parts of the world interact and are able to connect to one another?

      Answer: This answer can vary depending on how one believes people should interact and connect with one another. But it important to keep in mind when thinking of ways, that we all went through developmental stages at different points in our life that may be somewhat similar and sometimes completely different. This is something that can be seen as a good thing because we can learn from others and with doing so grow more ourselves.

    1. Engelbart insisted that effective intellectual augmentation was always realized within a system, and that any intervention intended to accelerate intellectual augmentation must be understood as an intervention in a system. And while at many points the 1962 report emphasizes the individual knowledge worker, there is also the idea of sharing the context of one’s work (an idea Vannevar Bush had also described in “As We May Think”), the foundation of Engelbart’s lifelong view that a crucial way to accelerate intellectual augmentation was to think together more comprehensively and effectively. One might even rewrite Engelbart’s words above to say, “We do not speak of isolated clever individuals with knowledge of particular domains. We refer to a way of life in an integrated society where poets, musicians, dreamers, and visionaries usefully co-exist with engineers, scientists, executives, and governmental leaders.” Make your own list.
    1. all may not be as it seems and so I ask you think as you read this.

      fair. wouldn't it be great if we could put a note like this on everything that's written, religious texts, government documents, etc.

    1. did notice that from a young age that she was different. Dionna always preferred to play with animals than talk to people, but I figured it was because she just loved them. All her life, I have seen Dionna as a vibrant and happy little girl with a love for learning. I even stayed home from work for her first four years of life so I could teach her. Her thirst for knowledge was often greater than what school could give her. She liked to sit at the table and do work, but adored when we would go outside for hands-on learning. Maybe that was my mistake, letting her choose her own path. It may have hurt her in the long run. I knew about her being ostracized by her classmates in kindergarten and the bullying in elementary school. I honestly thought that the situation would mend itself or that eventually the kids would grow up and see the Dionna I knew. She got teased and tormented often while being called a nerd or a geek, but I saw her as a girl who just had so many questions about the world that she often blurted animal facts or created random math problems. To this day, she almost always has her nose covered in a book. However, I never noticed that as she got older, she got quieter.  In school, she often knew a lot of information about her classmates and spoke a lot about them, yet she never mentioned being invited to outings and parties. She had never created a close friendship. I often got along with the other mothers in school and when they happily invited her to their children’s events she would tense up. Going to parties, she would cling by my side and only drift away to play with the family pet or get food. To me, Dionna was always fun and outgoing, but now looking back I am not so sure anymore. When she entered her teenage years, she became homeschooled and I thought it was because she wanted to excel in school. It turns out that she just never connected to others. She saw staying at home and doing her work as a relief instead of being with her peers. They had bullied and excluded her from so many activities and never bothered to understand her that she decided to leave. I had been pushing those thoughts to the back of my head and it’s heartrending to discover that my worst nightmares are true. I would have never thought that this would have happened to her. Luckily, once she went to college things changed immensely for the better. I still didn’t know about her problems with socializing until recently, but I do remember she would talk more enthusiastically about school and her smiles seemed to be genuine. She would talk about having lunch with friends, talking about their majors, helping each other with assignments, and their inside jokes. Dionna really came out of her shell and blossomed with these new friends.  She even started to spend time with friends outside of school. All her life, I had seen her only develop close relationships with animals and enjoy time with her pets. Now she has really come into her own person. She has a sense of balance. Yes, animals will always be her favorite because she feels as if they never judge and looked through her instead of at her, but she no longer uses them as a crutch to avoid people.  She now has friends that really appreciate her and understand her unique style. Dionna no longer has to hide her true personality and feels completely comfortable in her skin. I recently discovered that she used to not participate in class due to feeling too shy to talk, but that is no longer the case.  I recently read her autoethnography because I usually read her schoolwork, especially her interesting assignments. That is how I discovered her socialization problems. It is unfortunate in this world that children often judge too quickly. Even though she is my daughter, as her mother I hope that she continues to find wonderful people in the world that make her feel as special as I think she is. She deserves to meet kind, loving, and respectful people and I wish her all the best.

      This reads like a review of what you've already learned through your first draft of your autoethnography. I wonder if you should have interviewed your mom after she read your draft instead of imagining what she was thinking. OR if you should have reflected more on what she was thinking when you were home and when you were reading books instead of going to parties.

    1. claimed that “a better, cheaper and more effective service for the commuter” beckoned. Rail fares: unions and Labour condemn 'staggering' increase Read more Fast forward 25 years, and commuters are facing average fare hikes of 3.4% – with season tickets jumping by 3.6%: the biggest increase since 2013. And this, in a county where workers have suffered the longest squeeze in wages in generations. While the cheapest single ticket to the capital will cost a British commuter 50p per mile, German passengers are paying just 19p a mile. According to TUC research, British passengers commuting from Chelmsford to London are shelling out 13% of their salary on travel; a French worker travelling from Étampes to Paris will see only 2% of their wage packet eaten up by the cost. And for so many Britons, their miserable lot is paying extortionate sums for an overcrowded commute, pressed against the bodies of other understandably grumpy passengers. Government plans to consider linking future price hikes to a lower level of inflation is a woefully inadequate response. Other wealthy nations manage to provide decent quality rail travel at an affordable price: but then, rather than flog this critical national service to profiteers, they’ve maintained them under public ownership. The government does allow state ownership of some rail and energy services – but only if they are foreign governments who are not accountable to British citizens. 'Weight is a lifelong struggle': your best comments today Read more The answer is to bring the rail franchises back under public control – as was successfully done with East Coast before it was idiotically sold off – as part of an integrated, modernised system. No more dividends for shareholders: all the money to be reinvested back into this critical service. This disastrous experiment sums up so many of the Tories’ woes. Their fundamentalist pro-market dogma keeps colliding with the lived experience of millions of people: from the terrible cuts to living standards which followed the financial crash, to the failed privatisation of the utilities. The miserable state of our railways is another reminder that the economic system has failed – and must be replaced. • Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist Topics Rail fares First thoughts Transport policy Transport comment Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on WhatsApp Share on Messenger Reuse this content Advertisement First thoughts Quick takes on big stories from Comment is free columnists Children are dying on our streets – May’s response is not good enough Gaby Hinsliff Conservative governments fail because they cut and cut, and for a long time we don’t notice. Then we feel the impact, writes Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff 3h 3h Children are dying on our streets – May’s response is not good enough May’s Brexit bung to the north is pathetic. It changes nothing Simon Jenkins The £1.6bn the PM has promised to secure Labour support for her deal is no match for years of systematic neglect, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins 1d 1d May’s Brexit bung to the north is pathetic. It changes nothing There is no magic ‘stop Brexit’ button for Labour. There never has been Owen Jones There are simply not enough Labour MPs in leave areas who are willing pass the Kyle-Wilson amendment and trigger another referendum, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones 4d 4d There is no magic ‘stop Brexit’ button for Labour. There never has been The fight for EU citizens’ rights could become another Windrush Polly Toynbee The Tory MP Alberto Costa wants to secure post-Brexit rights. But nothing is certain in the face of a hostile Home Office, says Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee 5d 5d The fight for EU citizens’ rights could become another Windrush View all comments > comments (752)Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion. Guardian Pick The taxpayer is already subsidising the rail system to a large degree. Privatisation hasn't got rid of that, which is one reason it's failed. Jump to comment SnowyJohn 2 Jan 2018 196 197 Guardian Pick East Coast wasn't "sold off" and would generate money under any ownership. Ending dividends for shareholders would not necessarily release any of the 3 percent margin as it would also remove incentives to maximize revenue (eg by encouraging off peak usage). This "disastrous experiment" is a victim of its own success, doubling passenger numbers after years of stagnation. British Rail used to solve overcrowding by increasing fares. Just because a p… Jump to comment Mick James 2 Jan 2018 46 47 Guardian Pick In Northern Ireland, the NI Railways network is still publicly owned by Translink. To get A day return from Belfast to Derry at the station it costs £18.50. This is a 2 hour journey and the longest journey possible on the NI rail network. (It’s as little as £12.50 if prebooked online with a railcard) On the other hand An equivalent length 2 hour journey in England going from London to Liverpool today would cost you £85 for just a single ticket. Jump to comment Ernekid 2 Jan 2018 91 92 Guardian Pick For the tories, the free market has become such an ideological nirvana that they keep throwing money at it to make it work. Whatever your politics, that's both amazing and stupid (and, in fairness, many grassroots tories afaict are just as appalled). Jump to comment tomandlu 2 Jan 2018 162 163 Order by oldest newest oldest recommendations Show 25 25 50 100 All Threads collapsed collapsed expanded unthreaded 1 2 3 4 … next Loading comments… Trouble loading? Plataea 2 Jan 2018 12:13 187 188 The Tories buy their cognitive dissonace by the truck load - you can wheel out the evidence till the cows come home - won't make a blind bit of difference - they don't giove a stuff.Tories: shafting british peasants & serfs since the 18th century. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report fishplate Plataea 2 Jan 2018 13:27 32 33 Serfdom was long gone (in England and Wales at least) by the 18th century. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Watered fishplate 2 Jan 2018 13:31 78 79 I disagree.Serfing is still very popular on the south coast. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report RDUK123 Plataea 2 Jan 2018 13:37 25 26 What evidence has been wheeled out in this article? That its possible for a country to reduce its rail fares by throwing money at the system to subsidise it, like Germany? I travel by rail a lot, my biggest annoyance is the poor mobile signal whilst travelling. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 6 more replies tomandlu 2 Jan 2018 12:14 Guardian Pick 162 163 For the tories, the free market has become such an ideological nirvana that they keep throwing money at it to make it work. Whatever your politics, that's both amazing and stupid (and, in fairness, many grassroots tories afaict are just as appalled). Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Unpick Report TragicomedyBeholder tomandlu 2 Jan 2018 13:40 32 33 Whatever your politics, that's both amazing and stupid That may be the natural reaction, but it’s the wrong reaction. In actual fact, everything is going exactly according to plan – for the plutonomy that is. For the rest of us, the commuting precariat, it is another case of like it or lump it. Just as worker insecurity helps the economy to grow and satisfies the needs of the 1 percent, so too inefficient and expensive railways. Why should they change a systems that is working perfectly……. for them? Of course, we can expect some lip service, the usual pledges, and perhaps the odd patch-up job or gimmick here and there, but that will be about it. It wouldn’t surprise me if they were now to argue a case for total privatisation of the railways in order to encourage competition and produce competitive prices. That would be the logical conclusion within fundamentalist free-market dogma. Then, whatever the outcome, there would be no one to blame since the free market sets its own rules and prices. End of story. Government absolved of all future responsibility. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Simon Cohen tomandlu 2 Jan 2018 13:42 76 77 'and, in fairness, many grassroots tories afaict are just as appalled' Yes but they still keep voting for them which is why we have a rigid 40% support for these incompetents. The problem is, the public have been conned for the last 40 years that 'there's no money' and Britain will go bankrupt and we'll be like Weimar Germany/Zimbabwe/Venezuela (take your pick of the unfounded cliches). When will the British wake up to the fact that we're in the fifth decade of a dreadful experiment involving the financial industry catheterising whole populations levaing people staggering around with massive debt, poor quality jobs and atrocious infrastructure and lack of public services? There is NO shortage of money because the Goverment issues the currency just as it did when we had QE. There is also no chance of inflation from this spending because we are operating well under capacity and have massive levels of uderemployment and ropey jobs combined with private debt of nearly 2 trillion. Get the financialised industry off our backs-they do nothing but 'shuffle wealth' around a limited circuit. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Mauvegrail tomandlu 2 Jan 2018 14:04 20 21 The ideological nirvana that you talk about is (excepting the content) identical to the reverence shown by Americans for their constitution and Muslims for the Koran. Nothing is allowed to change because it is the received wisdom from an earlier age. The franchises given to these groups or individuals are virtually the same as the monopolies bestowed by royalty in the past. They are a licence to print money. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 2 more replies Mongost 2 Jan 2018 12:14 112 113 Fast forward 25 years, and commuters are facing average fare hikes of 3.4% – with season tickets jumping by 3.6% It's the government that sets the annual increase in regulated fares. German passengers are paying just 19p a mile German taxpayers pay EUR 17b a year for Germany's railways. Our taxpayers pay GBP 5b a year. The answer is to bring the rail franchises back under public control How would that make the government change their policy on annual regulated fare increases? It isn't at all clear. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Wally Mooney Mongost 2 Jan 2018 13:34 62 63 Our taxpayers pay GBP 5b a year. That’s not really the case though. The government is the origin of it’s own currency and neither taxation nor borrowing are required to finance government spending in sterling. The act of government spending creates the money which is then later partially removed via taxation. So the UK government does not ever have to worry about how to ‘pay for’ things in terms of pounds and pennies. The actual limitation is whether or not the UK has enough real resources (human skills and non-human materials, energy, steel, concrete, water, land, machines etc.) to achieve its policy objectives.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/warren-mosler/taxes-for-revenue-are-obs_b_542134.html Any shortages of funding for public transport, the NHS, social housing etc is purely an ideological choice of those that govern us. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report matt h Wally Mooney 2 Jan 2018 14:29 52 53 Wally by name - wally by nature. The government can print all the money it wants - as it does so it loses its value. The government can issue bonds this is technically a loan from people who buy the bonds. But alas these need paying back with interest.Then there is good old spending within your means.... Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Gcorbs Wally Mooney 2 Jan 2018 14:29 This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs. Show 8 more replies Roger ERRINGTON 2 Jan 2018 12:15 132 133 Spot on! Rail privatisation was one step too far even for Thatcher. It was an early example of a weak PM (Major) caving in to the Tory far right. An unmitigated disaster - like the vast majority of private sell-offs. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report TheGribbler Roger ERRINGTON 2 Jan 2018 13:42 38 39 An unmitigated disaster which a study by Imperial College London estimates has saved 150 lives in improved safety. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report towel TheGribbler 2 Jan 2018 13:49 64 65 How did privatisation in itself improve safety? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report TheGribbler towel 2 Jan 2018 13:52 45 46 Investment. It's increased ninefold since privatisation. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 4 more replies feeling 2 Jan 2018 12:16 70 71 The answer is to bring the rail franchises back under public control No, sack the greedy drivers on their £80,000 salaries and track staff on £800 a day and let the market decide how much staff get paid - Pay them the same as bus drivers - £25,000 a year max. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Redblair feeling 2 Jan 2018 13:28 159 160 Yes mate, it's the workers' fault... Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Norsked feeling 2 Jan 2018 13:29 90 91 Why don't you think anyone should earn more than £25k a year? I assume you believe no-one should earn more than that and aren't just singling out train drivers, because the latter would be ridiculous... Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report excathedra feeling 2 Jan 2018 13:31 89 90 Another example of when you haven't a clue just lie and hope dome of it sticks. Here's a truth for you. Brian Souter, who used a variety of unpleasant tactics to establish his business in the first place, took out £400 million as dividends ensuring that he paid very little tax on a business that he shouldn't own, hasn't built up and makes money on the backs of very poorly paid workers. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 13 more replies shangani 2 Jan 2018 12:16 38 39 No it doesn't...why should people who never use a train subsidise people who do...I don't expect people who use a train to subsidise me driving a car. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Nepthsolem shangani 2 Jan 2018 13:29 136 137 why should people who never use a train subsidise people who do Because that's how infrastructure works in society. I don't expect people who use a train to subsidise me driving a car. Yet that is exactly what happens. The roads you drive on, the lights that light them and the people who repair them are paid for out of general taxation. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report fishworld shangani 2 Jan 2018 13:29 83 84 But you do expect there to be a non-toll-based road network, right? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report WelshPaul shangani 2 Jan 2018 13:30 104 105 Why should people who don't have children subsidise those who do? Why do I have to pay council tax to the fire brigade when my home has never burned down? Taxation doesn't work that way. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 31 more replies Mick James 2 Jan 2018 12:20 Guardian Pick 46 47 East Coast wasn't "sold off" and would generate money under any ownership. Ending dividends for shareholders would not necessarily release any of the 3 percent margin as it would also remove incentives to maximize revenue (eg by encouraging off peak usage). This "disastrous experiment" is a victim of its own success, doubling passenger numbers after years of stagnation. British Rail used to solve overcrowding by increasing fares. Just because a privatised rail system has problems Durant mean they will go away if it is nationalised. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Unpick Report LeftOrRightSameShite Mick James 2 Jan 2018 14:46 38 39 Ending dividends for shareholders would not necessarily release any of the 3 percent margin as it would also remove incentives to maximize revenue Interesting you write "would not necessarily" release the 3% margin yet are much more certain when you write "it would" remove revenue incentives. Pull your trousers up chap...your ideology is showing. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Paul1977 2 Jan 2018 12:25 21 22 The way to properly deal with this is to end the current franchise system that replaces a public monopoly with several private ones. OK is wrong to claim this as an example of the free market gone wrong as there is no free market here. In fact the best way to solve this problem is to create some genuine competition between the TOCs - it is competition that drives down prices and drives up standards, not mere private ownership. The current franchise system should be ripped up and something that creates genuine competition to replace it. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Paul1977 Paul1977 2 Jan 2018 12:26 0 1 OK should read OJ (Owen Jones!) Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report SnowyJohn Paul1977 2 Jan 2018 13:29 31 32 I think this was always the fundamental problem with rail privatisation: privatisation only leads to improvements if there is genuine competition, and the franchise system for rail doesn't really produce that. Rather than "privatisation", we should really call it what it is: a modern day form of selling monopolies. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report treebranches Paul1977 2 Jan 2018 13:33 9 10 The current franchise system should be ripped up and something that creates genuine competition to replace it. How could such a system work? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 11 more replies andrew ward 2 Jan 2018 12:26 202 203 Owen, you might not fully grasp this, but it's the taxpayer (not that magic money tree again) who ends up paying for those wonderful cheaper rail fares in Germany, France etc etc. So do you actually support cross subsidisation of the commuter rail network by people who may never use it - or perhaps due to geographical location, can never use it? If so I think you should set that case out here rather than come out with meaningless propagandist nonsense about rail fares being a failure of 'pro market dogma'. (I appreciate that such an approach involves some real mental effort rather than a simple 'cut and paste' - not great with a New Year's hangover.. ) You end with that ringing phrase - 'the economic system has failed - and must be replaced'. With what exactly??? If you could offer one example - yes, just one - of a centrally planned socialist economy anywhere in the world that has worked better than our own 'failed' free market system you might be taken a little more seriously. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Redblair andrew ward 2 Jan 2018 13:29 68 69 Any of the Scandinavian countries? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report DiBosco andrew ward 2 Jan 2018 13:32 151 152 That's right, ignore how the shareholders get paid and the rail companies still get subsidies. Tory and rail shareholder are we? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report SnowyJohn andrew ward 2 Jan 2018 13:33 Guardian Pick 196 197 The taxpayer is already subsidising the rail system to a large degree. Privatisation hasn't got rid of that, which is one reason it's failed. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Unpick Report Show 18 more replies dunn31 2 Jan 2018 12:27 19 20 According to a comprehensive survey carried out in 2012 our rail services are above the European average for cost efficiency.The cost for train drivers was 40% higher in the UK then the European average.This suggests that the existing system is extremely efficient given that its cost per mile good and it salaries high.If the article by Mr Jones is accurate all that needs to happen is for everyone to pay more tax so that rail fares can have a greater subsidy. I think he forgot to mention that was the case in the examples he was quoting. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report DiBosco dunn31 2 Jan 2018 13:30 5 6 Source please. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report RDUK123 dunn31 2 Jan 2018 13:31 21 22 Correct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_subsidies#Europe According to this, Germany subsidises its rail by 17 Billion Euro, the UK by 4.4 Billion Euro. German passengers are being massively subsided at the expense of people who never use the system. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Kingkerouac dunn31 2 Jan 2018 13:31 14 15 How much more was the cost of executives?And how many more of them?Train drivers should be paid decently - they do the work.Executives. Well what do they do to deserve their huge wages? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 3 more replies PrakashShah 2 Jan 2018 13:25 5 6 Outsource it to Uber. We can all limousine to work like Grayling. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report fishplate 2 Jan 2018 13:25 5 6 Other wealthy nations manage to provide decent quality rail travel at an affordable price: but then, rather than flog this critical national service to profiteers, they’ve maintained them under public ownership. Are Germany, Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand and Canada - to take some examples of places where commuter services are operated by contractors - not "wealthy nations"? Anyway, if the trains get any busier, no-one will use them. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Giuseppa_Acciaio fishplate 2 Jan 2018 13:43 8 9 "operated by contractors" doesn't equate to "privatised": in Germany for example the railways are owned by Deutsche Bahn (which has the State as its only shareholder) and operated by Deutsche Bahn and other companies. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report fishplate Giuseppa_Acciaio 2 Jan 2018 14:03 7 8 You mean like in Great Britain, where the railways are owned by Network Rail (which has the state as its only shareholder) and services are operated various companies? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report greenwichite 2 Jan 2018 13:25 19 20 Brilliantly written piece from OJ. Not a word wasted. Re-nationalise the railways. It's a winning policy for Labour. They can privatise the motorways to keep the Blairites happy, with French-style tolls. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report zippymosquito 2 Jan 2018 13:26 4 5 I don't think people would mind quite so much if the trains regularly appeared on time (or ran at all, for that matter) - and you had some chance of getting a seat. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Dufftime75 zippymosquito 2 Jan 2018 13:36 3 4 Well this is it isn't it? They've lowered our expectations so much we're grateful for scraps. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Ernekid 2 Jan 2018 13:26 Guardian Pick 91 92 In Northern Ireland, the NI Railways network is still publicly owned by Translink. To get A day return from Belfast to Derry at the station it costs £18.50. This is a 2 hour journey and the longest journey possible on the NI rail network. (It’s as little as £12.50 if prebooked online with a railcard) On the other hand An equivalent length 2 hour journey in England going from London to Liverpool today would cost you £85 for just a single ticket. Nationalised railways exist in the UK and they work. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Unpick Report fishplate Ernekid 2 Jan 2018 13:41 27 28 Belfast Central - Londonderry Waterside 151 km, 2 h 02 min on little diesel trains.London Euston - Liverpool Lime Street 312 km 2 h 12 min on intercity electric trains. If you are willing to travel this evening rather than now, you can do it for £33. The NI network was in such a state a few years ago, and ridership was so low, that there was serious talk of just giving up and abandoning it (although the Republic might have been willing to take over Dublin - Belfast at least). Instead the government agreed to throw buckets full of money at it. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report FTRH Ernekid 2 Jan 2018 15:12 4 5 Belfast to Londonderry 71 miles if you care to deal in facts! Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report SteveYates Ernekid 2 Jan 2018 15:18 18 19 Strangely, the value of a train journey is in the distance, not the time. If the Belfast - Derry journey took four hours, your analysis would suggest you'd happily pay twice as much for it, despite it being obviously worse. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Nepthsolem 2 Jan 2018 13:27 85 86 While the cheapest single ticket to the capital will cost a British commuter 50p per mile, German passengers are paying just 19p a mile The solution is simple then. Pretend to be German when you buy your ticket. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Frenske Nepthsolem 2 Jan 2018 14:55 24 25 Gutday, Ich want a ticket von Cambridge to London mit Deutsche discount. Klop. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report rustyowl 2 Jan 2018 13:27 7 8 No misery related to all the strikes? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report marziPANIC 2 Jan 2018 13:28 89 90 Those of us old enough to recall British Rail respectfully disagree Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Trumbledon marziPANIC 2 Jan 2018 13:32 36 37 The thing is that Owen isn't, really. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report odstjackson marziPANIC 2 Jan 2018 13:32 5 6 As a 30 something, I only know the privatized version, My parents hate both. Some new paradigm altogether is apparently needed. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Nepthsolem marziPANIC 2 Jan 2018 13:33 57 58 British Rail meant vast amounts of public money pumped into a system of late, dirty trains. Post-BR, we now have vast amounts of public money pumped into a system of late, dirty trains only with private companies managing to profit from it. Progress! Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 15 more replies jjsalmo 2 Jan 2018 13:28 46 47 Owen appears to have only one solution to all problems, namely 'Nationalisation'.Rather than those that use the service being responsible, he suggests that the general taxpayer, many who do not use the train would subsidise those that do.The other issue he fails to mention, is that the least efficient element and cause of much of the delays etc is already nationalised. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report ID4469239 jjsalmo 2 Jan 2018 13:44 25 26 Why do we pay the nationalised French companies to run our transport and subsidise French passengers from our fares ? Why should I have to subsidise those people deluded enough to think that Trident provides some sort of defence to me and my family. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report jjsalmo ID4469239 2 Jan 2018 13:59 8 9 You shouldn't, no argument there, but going back to the days of BR will achieve nothing. There needs to be greater genuine competition coupled with real sanctions for non-delivery. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Kingkerouac 2 Jan 2018 13:30 13 14 Everything Thatcher dogmatised, electric, gas, rail travel, football, poll-tax/rates has shot up in price when 'choice' was supposed to reduce prices. What happened? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report YEverKnot Kingkerouac 2 Jan 2018 13:40 7 8 Thatcher was responsible for football tickets? Well, I never. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report StephenHawking Kingkerouac 2 Jan 2018 13:44 3 4 Football? Don't disagree its become very expensive, but I am not sure Thatcher can be blamed for that. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report ChipKennedy Kingkerouac 2 Jan 2018 13:47 4 5 Bait and Switch . Heads you lose Tails they win . Socialism for the 1% Austerity and Rail price increases for the 99% . Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Show 2 more replies TheSpecialNeedsOne 2 Jan 2018 13:31 4 5 Good to hear you agree with Lord Adonis, Owen. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report odstjackson 2 Jan 2018 13:31 3 4 Our entire Produce/Consume society we are enslaved to is a problem. Any way of life that puts greed, selfishness and power at the forefront should not exist. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report rodmclaughlin 2 Jan 2018 13:32 1 2 The railway disaster doesn't prove that privatisation is a bad thing. It only shows that privatisation of the railways - in which companies have an inbuilt monopoly, because you can't have rival companies competing at the same times on the same lines - is a bad thing. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Trumbledon 2 Jan 2018 13:32 5 6 John Major claimed that “a better, cheaper and more effective service for the commuter” beckoned. He got two of those right, he was only wrong on cost. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report YEverKnot Trumbledon 2 Jan 2018 13:40 6 7 You really think fares would go down under nationalisation? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report Trumbledon YEverKnot 2 Jan 2018 13:46 5 6 No, not necessarily. All I'm saying is that services are now better and more effective than they were under BR. If you want a reminder of what BR was like, take a ride on one of the Class 156's which still operate in Scotland. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report DiBosco Trumbledon 2 Jan 2018 13:58 18 19 I'm willing to bet in the 70s the rail system, were it privatised, would have been absolutely no better. The world is a very different place now and renationalised railways would be nothing like 70s BR. There is no inherent reason nationalised industry can't be good. Noticed any improvement in gas, electricity and water since they started lining the pockets of the insanely rich? Do other countries' nationalised railways work a treat? Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report HonestJo 2 Jan 2018 13:32 21 22 Whatever our thoughts on privatisation please don't expect hard pressed tax payers outside London to subsidise jobs in London at the expense of their local poor services. If people can't afford to commute to these London jobs then frankly these jobs should move to places where people can afford to live and don't need to commute. Simple really. Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report ID4469239 HonestJo 2 Jan 2018 13:41 5 6 The companies should pay taxes which subsidise public transport. It's not rocket science (which is why this happens in other countries such as France) Reply Share Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter | Pick Report 1 2 3 4 … next Sorry there was an error. Please try again later. If the problem persists, please contact Userhelp Close report comment form Please select Personal abuse Off topic Legal issue Trolling Hate speech Offensive/Threatening language Copyright Spam Other Reason (optional) Email (optional) Report Sign in or create your Guardian account to recommend a comment View more comments <form class="component js-comment-box d-comment-box"> <div class="d-comment-box__meta"> <span class="d-comment-box__avatar-wrapper"></span> <div class="d-comment-box__meta-text"> <span class="d-comment-box__author-label">Signed in as</span> <span class="d-comment-box__author"></span> <span class="inline-reply inline-icon grey" > <svg width="18" height="18" class="grey__svg inline-reply__svg inline-icon__svg"> <path d="M10.1 5l.9-1 4 4.5v1L11 14l-.9-1 2.5-3H4L3 9V6.5h2V8h7.6l-2.5-3z" /> </svg> </span> <span class="d-comment-box__reply-to-author"></span> <span class="u-fauxlink d-comment-box__show-parent" role="button">Show comment</span> <span class="u-fauxlink d-comment-box__hide-parent" role="button">Hide comment</span> </div> </div> <div class="d-comment-box__parent-comment-wrapper"> <div class="d-comment-box__parent-comment-spout"></div> <div class="d-comment-box__parent-comment"> <span class="d-comment-box__parent-comment-author"></span> <div class="d-comment-box__parent-comment-body"></div> <span class="u-fauxlink d-comment-box__hide-parent" role="button">Hide comment</span> </div> </div> <div class="d-comment-box__onboarding"> <h3>Welcome <span class="d-comment-box__onboarding-author"></span>, you’re about to make your first comment!</h3> <p>Before you post, we’d like to thank you for joining the debate - we’re glad you’ve chosen to participate and we value your opinions and experiences.</p> <div class="d-comment-box__onboarding-username"> <p>Please choose your username under which you would like all your comments to show up. You can only set your username once.</p> <label class="d-comment-box__onboarding-username-label" for="usernameInput">Username: </label> <span>Must be 6-20 characters, letters and/or numbers only, no spaces.</span> <input type="text" id="usernameInput" class="d-comment-box__onboarding-username-input" placeholder="" value=""/> <p class="d-comment-box__onboarding-username-error-message is-hidden"></p> </div> <p>Please keep your posts respectful and abide by the <a target="_blank" href="/community-standards">community guidelines</a> - and if you spot a comment you think doesn’t adhere to the guidelines, please use the ‘Report’ link next to it to let us know.</p> <p>Please preview your comment below and click ‘post’ when you’re happy with it.</p> <div class="d-comment-box__onboarding-preview-body"></div> <button type="submit" class="u-button-reset button button--large button--primary submit-input--behaviour d-comment-box__onboarding-submit">Post your comment</button> <button type="button" class="u-button-reset button button--large button--primary submit-input--behaviour d-comment-box__onboarding-cancel">Cancel</button> </div> <div class="d-comment-box__content"> <div class="d-comment-box__messages"></div> <div class="d-discussion__error d-comment-box__premod"> <span class="inline-status-alert inline-icon " > <svg width="18" height="18" viewbox="0 0 18 18" class="inline-status-alert__svg inline-icon__svg"> <circle fill="#d61d00" cx="9" cy="9" r="9" /> <path fill="#fff" d="M9.7 11.3H8.3L6.9 3.6l.7-.7h2.8l.7.8-1.4 7.6zM9 15.4c-.8 0-1.4-.6-1.4-1.4 0-.8.6-1.4 1.4-1.4s1.4.6 1.4 1.4c0 .8-.6 1.4-1.4 1.4z" /> </svg> </span> <span class="d-discussion__error-text">Your comments are currently being pre-moderated (<a href="/community-faqs#311" target="_blank">why?</a>)</span> </div> <div class="d-comment-box__community-standards">Please keep comments respectful and abide by the <a href="/community-standards">community guidelines</a>.</div> <label for="d-comment-box" class="u-h">Enter comment</label> <textarea name="body" class="textarea d-comment-box__body" placeholder="Join the discussion…" id="d-comment-box"></textarea> <button type="submit" data-link-name="post comment" class="u-button-reset button button--large button--primary submit-input--behaviour d-comment-box__submit">Post your comment</button> <span class="u-fauxlink d-comment-box__preview" role="button">Preview</span> <span class="u-fauxlink d-comment-box__hide-preview" role="button">Hide preview</span> <span class="u-fauxlink d-comment-box__cancel" role="button">Cancel</span> <ul class="d-comment-box__formatting-controls"> <li class="d-comment-box__formatting-bold" title="Bold">B</li> <li class="d-comment-box__formatting-italic" title="Italic">i</li> <li class="d-comment-box__formatting-quote" title="Quote">&#8221;</li> <li class="d-comment-box__formatting-link" title="Link">Link</li> </ul> <div class="d-comment-box__preview-wrapper"> <div class="d-comment-box__preview-spout"></div> <div class="d-comment-box__preview-block"> <div class="d-comment-box__preview-body"></div> </div> </div> </div> </form> Most popular Most viewed Across The Guardian Most viewed in Opinion Senate set to reject Trump's national emergency declaration Senate set to reject Trump's national emergency declaration Clintons accused of nepotism in book on US-Ireland relations Clintons accused of nepotism in book on US-Ireland relations Age of the autosexual: the people sexually attracted to themselves Age of the autosexual: the people sexually attracted to themselves Hillary Clinton rules out running for president in 2020 Hillary Clinton rules out running for president in 2020 'Ridiculous' micro handbag that can fit only a few mints becomes fashion sensation 'Ridiculous' micro handbag that can fit only a few mints becomes fashion sensation Hotels at centre of rape allegations promoted on TripAdvisor Hotels at centre of rape allegations promoted on TripAdvisor Live Michael Cohen's lawyer reportedly sought pardon from Trump – live Michael Cohen's lawyer reportedly sought pardon from Trump – live Revealed: AmazonSmile helps fund anti-vaccine groups Revealed: AmazonSmile helps fund anti-vaccine groups The last great tree: a majestic relic of Canada's vanishing rainforest The last great tree: a majestic relic of Canada's vanishing rainforest ‘Starbucks on steroids’: can America’s new weed cafes make smoking social? ‘Starbucks on steroids’: can America’s new weed cafes make smoking social? If Democrats lure Amazon back to NYC, they won't be forgiven If Democrats lure Amazon back to NYC, they won't be forgiven Donald Trump tells a fake American story. We must tell the real one Donald Trump tells a fake American story. We must tell the real one Instagram is stripping its devotees of their basic humanity Instagram is stripping its devotees of their basic humanity As foreign secretary I argued against an EU referendum. Now I back one As foreign secretary I argued against an EU referendum. Now I back one Science never quite clicked for me at school. Then I discovered science YouTube Science never quite clicked for me at school. Then I discovered science YouTube Dear Europe, Brexit is a lesson for all of us: it’s time for renewal Dear Europe, Brexit is a lesson for all of us: it’s time for renewal Victoria's Secret, your airbrushed grip on the lingerie world is loosening Victoria's Secret, your airbrushed grip on the lingerie world is loosening Virgin Atlantic’s sexism goes deeper than telling women what to wear Virgin Atlantic’s sexism goes deeper than telling women what to wear Enough is enough: Michael Jackson's music is dead to me now Enough is enough: Michael Jackson's music is dead to me now If Trump loses, we know what to expect: anger, fear and disruption If Trump loses, we know what to expect: anger, fear and disruption As foreign secretary I argued against an EU referendum. Now I back one David Miliband Tests on London patient offer hope of HIV ‘cure’ The Guardian view Columnists Letters Opinion videos Cartoons About us Contact us Complaints & corrections Secure Drop Work for us Privacy policy Cookie policy Terms & conditions Help All topics All writers Digital newspaper archive Facebook Twitter Advertise with us Guardian Labs Search jobs Dating Discount Codes Support The Guardian Available for everyone, funded by readers Contribute Subscribe Back to top © 2019 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. Close As we begin 2019, please make a contribution to The Guardian to help us protect independent journalism at a time when factual, trustworthy reporting is under threat. Our editorial independence means we can pursue difficult investigations, challenging the powerful and holding them to account. And our journalism is open to everyone, regardless of what they can afford. But we depend on voluntary contributions from readers. We’re in this together – please make a contribution today to help us deliver the independent journalism the world needs for 2019 and beyond. Support The Guardian from as little as $1. Support The Guardian Close try{(function(isVeryModern,document,window){if(isVeryModern){var decodeBase64=function(str){return decodeURIComponent(atob(str.replace(/-/g,"+").replace(/_/g,"/").replace(/,/g,"\x3d")))};var cookieData=function(a){var d=[],e=document.cookie.split(";");a=RegExp("^\\s*"+a+"\x3d\\s*(.*?)\\s*$");for(var b=0;b<e.length;b++){var f=e[b].match(a);f&&d.push(f[1])}if(d.length>0)return d[0];return null}("GU_U");var userData=cookieData?JSON.parse(decodeBase64(cookieData.split(".")[0])):null;if(userData){var displayName=decodeURIComponent(userData[2]);window.guardian.config.user={id:userData[0],displayName:displayName,accountCreatedDate:userData[6],emailVerified:userData[7],rawResponse:cookieData}}}})(guardian.isEnhanced&&"atob"in window,document,window)}catch(e){};try{(function(document,window){if(typeof window.getComputedStyle!=="function")return;var ad=document.createElement("div");ad.style.position="absolute";ad.style.left="0";ad.style.WB_wombat_top="0";ad.style.height="10px";ad.style.zIndex="-1";ad.innerHTML="\x26nbsp;";ad.setAttribute("class","ad_unit");window.requestAnimationFrame(function(){document.body.appendChild(ad);window.requestAnimationFrame(function(){var adBlockers=window.guardian.adBlockers;var adStyles=window.getComputedStyle(ad);var displayProp=adStyles&&adStyles.getPropertyValue("display");var mozBindingProp=adStyles&&adStyles.getPropertyValue("-moz-binding");adBlockers.active=displayProp==="none"||mozBindingProp&&mozBindingProp.indexOf("about:")!==-1;runEachListener(adBlockers.onDetect);adBlockers.onDetect={push:function(){var toRun=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0);runEachListener(toRun)}};function runEachListener(listeners){for(var i=0;i<listeners.length;i++)try{listeners[i](adBlockers.active)}catch(e){}}})})})(document,window)}catch(e){};try{(function(isVeryModern,document,window){var user=window.guardian.config.user;if(isVeryModern&&user)window.requestAnimationFrame(function(){var $profileInfoElem=document.getElementsByClassName("js-profile-info")[0];var $profileNavElem=document.getElementsByClassName("js-profile-nav")[0];if(!$profileInfoElem&&!$profileNavElem)return;$profileInfoElem.innerHTML=user.displayName;$profileNavElem.classList.add("is-signed-in");var $signInLinkElem=$profileNavElem.getElementsByTagName("a")[0];if($signInLinkElem)if(user.id)$signInLinkElem.addEventListener("click",function(e){e.preventDefault()});else $signInLinkElem.setAttribute("href",$signInLinkElem.getAttribute("href").replace("signin","public/edit/"));var $register=document.getElementsByClassName("js-profile-register");if($register.length){$register=$register[0];$register.parentElement.removeChild($register)}})})("classList"in document.documentElement,document,window)}catch(e){};try{(function(document,window){if(!window.__cmp)window.__cmp=function(){var listen=window.attachEvent||window.addEventListener;listen("message",function(event){window.__cmp.receiveMessage(event)},false);function addLocatorFrame(){if(!window.frames["__cmpLocator"])if(document.body){var frame=document.createElement("iframe");frame.style.display="none";frame.name="__cmpLocator";frame.setAttribute("aria-hidden",true);document.body.appendChild(frame)}else setTimeout(addLocatorFrame,5)}addLocatorFrame();var commandQueue=[];var cmp=function(command,parameter,callback){if(command==="ping"){if(callback)callback({gdprAppliesGlobally:!!(window.__cmp&&window.__cmp.config&&window.__cmp.config.storeConsentGlobally),cmpLoaded:false})}else commandQueue.push({command:command,parameter:parameter,callback:callback})};cmp.commandQueue=commandQueue;cmp.receiveMessage=function(event){var data=event&&event.data&&event.data.__cmpCall;if(data)commandQueue.push({callId:data.callId,command:data.command,parameter:data.parameter,event:event})};cmp.config={storeConsentGlobally:false,storePublisherData:false,logging:false,gdprApplies:false};return cmp}()})(document,window)}catch(e){};try{(function(document,window){function shouldServeLotame(){try{var geo=JSON.parse(window.localStorage.getItem("gu.geolocation")).value;if(geo==="US"||geo==="CA"||geo==="AU"||geo==="NZ")return false;return true}catch(e){}return false}if(shouldServeLotame()){var script=document.createElement("script");script.src="https://tags.crwdcntrl.net/c/12666/cc.js";document.body.appendChild(script)}})(document,window)}catch(e){};(function(window,document){function getCookieValue(name){var nameEq=name+"\x3d",cookies=document.cookie.split(";"),value=null;cookies.forEach(function(cookie){while(cookie.charAt(0)===" ")cookie=cookie.substring(1,cookie.length);if(cookie.indexOf(nameEq)===0)value=cookie.substring(nameEq.length,cookie.length)});return value}window.guardian.config.ophan.browserId=getCookieValue("bwid")})(window,document);window.curlConfig={baseUrl:'https://assets.guim.co.uk/javascripts',apiName:'require',paths:{'ophan/ng':'//j.ophan.co.uk/ophan.ng'}};window.curl=window.curlConfig;(function(){(function(l){function p(){}function v(a,b){return 0==T.call(a).indexOf("[object "+b)}function x(a){return a&&"/"==a.charAt(a.length-1)?a.substr(0,a.length-1):a}function D(a,b){var d,c,f,g;d=1;c=a;"."==c.charAt(0)&&(f=!0,c=c.replace(U,function(a,b,c,f){c&&d++;return f||""}));if(f){f=b.split("/");g=f.length-d;if(0>g)return a;f.splice(g,d);return f.concat(c||[]).join("/")}return c}function C(a){var b=a.indexOf("!");return{g:a.substr(b+1),d:0<=b&&a.substr(0,b)}}function A(){}function y(a,b){A.prototype=a||N;var d=new A;A.prototype=N;for(var c in b)d[c]=b[c];return d}function E(){function a(a,b,d){c.push([a,b,d])}function b(a,b){for(var d,f=0;d=c[f++];)(d=d[a])&&d(b)}var d,c,f;d=this;c=[];f=function(d,n){a=d?function(a){a&&a(n)}:function(a,b){b&&b(n)};f=p;b(d?0:1,n);b=p;c=s};this.m=function(b,c,f){a(b,c,f);return d};this.h=function(a){d.C=a;f(!0,a)};this.f=function(a){d.qa=a;f(!1,a)};this.w=function(a){b(2,a)}}function z(a){return a instanceof E||a instanceof h}function t(a,b,d,c){z(a)?a.m(b,d,c):b(a)}function B(a,b,d){var c;return function(){0<=--a&&b&&(c=b.apply(s,arguments));0==a&&d&&d(c);return c}}function e(){var a,b;r="";a=[].slice.call(arguments);v(a[0],"Object")&&(b=a.shift(),b=w(b));return new h(a[0],a[1],a[2],b)}function w(a,b,d){var c;r="";if(a&&(k.R(a),q=k.b(a),"preloads"in a&&(c=new h(a.preloads,s,d,I,!0),k.l(function(){I=c})),a=a.main))return new h(a,b,d)}function h(a,b,d,c,f){var g;g=k.k(q,s,[].concat(a),f);this.then=this.m=a=function(a,b){t(g,function(b){a&&a.apply(s,b)},function(a){if(b)b(a);else throw a;});return this};this.next=function(a,b,c){return new h(a,b,c,g)};this.config=w;(b||d)&&a(b,d);k.l(function(){t(f||I,function(){t(c,function(){k.r(g)},d)})})}function K(a){var b,d;b=a.id;b==s&&(J!==s?J={I:"Multiple anonymous defines encountered"}:(b=k.da())||(J=a));if(b!=s){d=u[b];b in u||(d=k.j(b,q),d=k.F(d.b,b),u[b]=d);if(!z(d))throw Error("duplicate define: "+b);d.ha=!1;k.G(d,a)}}function F(){var a=k.aa(arguments);K(a)}var r,q,G,H,m=l.document,O=m&&(m.head||m.getElementsByTagName("head")[0]),V=O&&O.getElementsByTagName("base")[0]||null,Q={},R={},L={},W="addEventListener"in l?{}:{loaded:1,complete:1},N={},T=N.toString,s,u={},M={},I=!1,J,S=/^\/|^[^:]+:\/\//,U=/(\.)(\.?)(?:$|\/([^\.\/]+.*)?)/g,X=/\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\/|\/\/.*?[\n\r]/g,Y=/require\s*\(\s*(["'])(.*?[^\\])\1\s*\)|[^\\]?(["'])/g,Z=/\s*,\s*/,P,k;k={n:function(a,b,d){var c;a=D(a,b);if("."==a.charAt(0))return a;c=C(a);a=(b=c.d)||c.g;a in d.c&&(a=d.c[a].M||a);b&&(0>b.indexOf("/")&&!(b in d.c)&&(a=x(d.P)+"/"+b),a=a+"!"+c.g);return a},k:function(a,b,d,c){function f(b,c){var d,g;d=k.n(b,n.id,a);if(!c)return d;g=C(d);if(!g.d)return d;d=u[g.d];g.g="normalize"in d?d.normalize(g.g,f,n.b)||"":f(g.g);return g.d+"!"+g.g}function g(b,d,g){var e;e=d&&function(a){d.apply(s,a)};if(v(b,"String")){if(e)throw Error("require(id, callback) not allowed");g=f(b,!0);b=u[g];if(!(g in u))throw Error("Module not resolved: "+g);return(g=z(b)&&b.a)||b}t(k.r(k.k(a,n.id,b,c)),e,g)}var n;n=new E;n.id=b||"";n.ea=c;n.H=d;n.b=a;n.A=g;g.toUrl=function(b){return k.j(f(b,!0),a).url};n.n=f;return n},F:function(a,b,d){var c,f,g;c=k.k(a,b,s,d);f=c.h;g=B(1,function(a){c.q=a;try{return k.V(c)}catch(b){c.f(b)}});c.h=function(a){t(d||I,function(){f(u[c.id]=M[c.url]=g(a))})};c.J=function(a){t(d||I,function(){c.a&&(g(a),c.w(R))})};return c},U:function(a,b,d,c){return k.k(a,d,s,c)},ca:function(a){return a.A},K:function(a){return a.a||(a.a={})},ba:function(a){var b=a.t;b||(b=a.t={id:a.id,uri:k.L(a),exports:k.K(a),config:function(){return a.b}},b.a=b.exports);return b},L:function(a){return a.url||(a.url=k.D(a.A.toUrl(a.id),a.b))},R:function(a){var b,d,c,f,g;b="curl";d="define";c=f=l;if(a&&(g=a.overwriteApi||a.oa,b=a.apiName||a.ja||b,c=a.apiContext||a.ia||c,d=a.defineName||a.la||d,f=a.defineContext||a.ka||f,G&&v(G,"Function")&&(l.curl=G),G=null,H&&v(H,"Function")&&(l.define=H),H=null,!g)){if(c[b]&&c[b]!=e)throw Error(b+" already exists");if(f[d]&&f[d]!=F)throw Error(d+" already exists");}c[b]=e;f[d]=F},b:function(a){function b(a,b){var d,c,n,e,q;for(q in a){n=a[q];v(n,"String")&&(n={path:a[q]});n.name=n.name||q;e=f;c=C(x(n.name));d=c.g;if(c=c.d)e=g[c],e||(e=g[c]=y(f),e.c=y(f.c),e.e=[]),delete a[q];c=n;var r=b,h=void 0;c.path=x(c.path||c.WB_wombat_location||"");r&&(h=c.main||"."+"/"+"main","."==h.charAt(0)||(h="."+"/"+""+h),c.M=D(h,c.name+"/"));c.b=c.config;c.b&&(c.b=y(f,c.b));c.S=d.split("/").length;d?(e.c[d]=c,e.e.push(d)):e.o=k.Q(n.path,f)}}function d(a){var b=a.c;a.O=RegExp("^("+a.e.sort(function(a,c){return b[c].S-b[a].S}).join("|").replace(/\/|\./g,"\\$&")+")(?=\\/|$)");delete a.e}var c,f,g,n;"baseUrl"in a&&(a.o=a.baseUrl);"main"in a&&(a.M=a.main);"preloads"in a&&(a.pa=a.preloads);"pluginPath"in a&&(a.P=a.pluginPath);if("dontAddFileExt"in a||a.i)a.i=RegExp(a.dontAddFileExt||a.i);c=q;f=y(c,a);f.c=y(c.c);g=a.plugins||{};f.plugins=y(c.plugins);f.v=y(c.v,a.v);f.u=y(c.u,a.u);f.e=[];b(a.packages,!0);b(a.paths,!1);for(n in g)a=k.n(n+"!","",f),f.plugins[a.substr(0,a.length-1)]=g[n];g=f.plugins;for(n in g)if(g[n]=y(f,g[n]),a=g[n].e)g[n].e=a.concat(f.e),d(g[n]);for(n in c.c)f.c.hasOwnProperty(n)||f.e.push(n);d(f);return f},j:function(a,b){var d,c,f,g;d=b.c;f=S.test(a)?a:a.replace(b.O,function(a){c=d[a]||{};g=c.b;return c.path||""});return{b:g||q,url:k.Q(f,b)}},Q:function(a,b){var d=b.o;return d&&!S.test(a)?x(d)+"/"+a:a},D:function(a,b){return a+((b||q).i.test(a)?"":".js")},s:function(a,b,d){var c=m.createElement("script");c.onload=c.onreadystatechange=function(d){d=d||l.event;if("load"==d.type||W[c.readyState])delete L[a.id],c.onload=c.onreadystatechange=c.onerror="",b()};c.onerror=function(){d(Error("Syntax or http error: "+a.url))};c.type=a.N||"text/javascript";c.charset="utf-8";c.async=!a.fa;c.src=a.url;L[a.id]=c;O.insertBefore(c,V);return c},W:function(a){var b=[],d;("string"==typeof a?a:a.toSource?a.toSource():a.toString()).replace(X,"").replace(Y,function(a,f,g,e){e?d=d==e?s:d:d||b.push(g);return""});return b},aa:function(a){var b,d,c,f,g,e;g=a.length;c=a[g-1];f=v(c,"Function")?c.length:-1;2==g?v(a[0],"Array")?d=a[0]:b=a[0]:3==g&&(b=a[0],d=a[1]);!d&&0<f&&(e=!0,d=["require","exports","module"].slice(0,f).concat(k.W(c)));return{id:b,q:d||[],B:0<=f?c:function(){return c},p:e}},V:function(a){var b;b=a.B.apply(a.p?a.a:s,a.q);b===s&&a.a&&(b=a.t?a.a=a.t.exports:a.a);return b},G:function(a,b){a.B=b.B;a.p=b.p;a.H=b.q;k.r(a)},r:function(a){function b(a,b,c){e[b]=a;c&&r(a,b)}function d(b,c){var d,f,g,e;d=B(1,function(a){f(a);m(a,c)});f=B(1,function(a){r(a,c)});g=k.Y(b,a);(e=z(g)&&g.a)&&f(e);t(g,d,a.f,a.a&&function(a){g.a&&(a==Q?f(g.a):a==R&&d(g.a))})}function c(){a.h(e)}var f,g,e,q,h,r,m;e=[];g=a.H;q=g.length;0==g.length&&c();r=B(q,b,function(){a.J&&a.J(e)});m=B(q,b,c);for(f=0;f<q;f++)h=g[f],h in P?(m(P[h](a),f,!0),a.a&&a.w(Q)):h?d(h,f):m(s,f,!0);return a},Z:function(a){k.L(a);k.s(a,function(){var b=J;J=s;!1!==a.ha&&(!b||b.I?a.f(Error(b&&b.I||"define() missing or duplicated: "+a.url)):k.G(a,b))},a.f);return a},Y:function(a,b){var d,c,f,g,e,h,r,m,w,l,p,s;d=b.n;c=b.ea;f=b.b||q;e=d(a);e in u?h=e:(g=C(e),m=g.g,h=g.d||m,w=k.j(h,f));if(!(e in u))if(s=k.j(m,f).b,g.d)r=h;else if(r=s.moduleLoader||s.na||s.loader||s.ma)m=h,h=r,w=k.j(r,f);h in u?l=u[h]:w.url in M?l=u[h]=M[w.url]:(l=k.F(s,h,c),l.url=k.D(w.url,w.b),u[h]=M[w.url]=l,k.Z(l));h==r&&(g.d&&f.plugins[g.d]&&(s=f.plugins[g.d]),p=new E,t(l,function(a){var b,f,g;g=a.dynamic;m="normalize"in a?a.normalize(m,d,l.b)||"":d(m);f=r+"!"+m;b=u[f];if(!(f in u)){b=k.U(s,f,m,c);g||(u[f]=b);var e=function(a){g||(u[f]=a);b.h(a)};e.resolve=e;e.reject=e.error=b.f;a.load(m,b.A,e,s)}p!=b&&t(b,p.h,p.f,p.w)},p.f));return p||l},da:function(){var a;if(!v(l.opera,"Opera"))for(var b in L)if("interactive"==L[b].readyState){a=b;break}return a},$:function(a){var b=0,d,c;for(d=m&&(m.scripts||m.getElementsByTagName("script"));d&&(c=d[b++]);)if(a(c))return c},X:function(){var a,b="";(a=k.$(function(a){(a=a.getAttribute("data-curl-run"))&&(b=a);return a}))&&a.setAttribute("data-curl-run","");return b},T:function(){function a(){k.s({url:c.shift()},b,b)}function b(){r&&(c.length?(k.l(d),a()):d("run.js script did not run."))}function d(a){throw Error(a||"Primary run.js failed. Trying fallback.");}var c=r.split(Z);c.length&&a()},l:function(a){setTimeout(a,0)}};P={require:k.ca,exports:k.K,module:k.ba};e.version="0.8.9";e.config=w;F.amd={plugins:!0,jQuery:!0,curl:"0.8.9"};q={o:"",P:"curl/plugin",i:/\?|\.js\b/,v:{},u:{},plugins:{},c:{},O:/$^/};G=l.curl;H=l.define;G&&v(G,"Object")?(l.curl=s,w(G)):k.R();(r=k.X())&&k.l(k.T);u.curl=e;u["curl/_privileged"]={core:k,cache:u,config:function(){return q},_define:K,_curl:e,Promise:E}})(this.window||"undefined"!=typeof global&&global||this);(function(l,p){function v(){if(!p.body)return!1;F||(F=p.createTextNode(""));try{return p.body.removeChild(p.body.appendChild(F)),F=K,!0}catch(e){return!1}}function x(){var r;r=A[p[C]]&&v();if(!z&&r){z=!0;for(clearTimeout(h);e=w.pop();)e();E&&(p[C]="complete");for(var q;q=y.shift();)q()}return r}function D(){x();z||(h=setTimeout(D,t))}var C="readyState",A={loaded:1,interactive:1,complete:1},y=[],E=p&&"string"!=typeof p[C],z=!1,t=10,B,e,w=[],h,K,F;B="addEventListener"in l?function(e,h){e.addEventListener(h,x,!1);return function(){e.removeEventListener(h,x,!1)}}:function(e,h){e.attachEvent("on"+h,x);return function(){e.detachEvent(h,x)}};p&&!x()&&(w=[B(l,"load"),B(p,"readystatechange"),B(l,"DOMContentLoaded")],h=setTimeout(D,t));define("curl/domReady",function(){function e(h){z?h():y.push(h)}e.then=e;e.amd=!0;return e})})(this,this.document);(function(l,p,v){define("curl/plugin/js",["curl/_privileged"],function(l){function D(e,w,h){function p(){r||(t<new Date?h():setTimeout(p,10))}var t,r,q;t=(new Date).valueOf()+(e.ga||3E5);h&&e.a&&setTimeout(p,10);q=l.core.s(e,function(){r=!0;e.a&&(e.C=v(e.a));!e.a||e.C?w(q):h()},function(e){r=!0;h(e)})}function C(e,l){D(e,function(){var h=y.shift();t=0<y.length;h&&C.apply(null,h);l.h(e.C||!0)},function(e){l.f(e)})}var A={},y=[],E=p&&!0==p.createElement("script").async,z,t,B=/\?|\.js\b/;z=l.Promise;return{dynamic:!0,normalize:function(e,l){var h=e.indexOf("!");return 0<=h?l(e.substr(0,h))+e.substr(h):l(e)},load:function(e,l,h,p){function v(e){(h.error||function(e){throw e;})(e)}var r,q,x,H,m;r=0<e.indexOf("!order");q=e.indexOf("!exports=");x=0<q?e.substr(q+9):p.a;H="prefetch"in p?p.prefetch:!0;e=r||0<q?e.substr(0,e.indexOf("!")):e;q=(q=p.dontAddFileExt||p.i)?RegExp(q):B;m=l.toUrl(e);q.test(m)||(m=m.lastIndexOf(".")<=m.lastIndexOf("/")?m+".js":m);m in A?A[m]instanceof z?A[m].m(h,v):h(A[m]):(e={name:e,url:m,fa:r,a:x,ga:p.timeout},A[m]=l=new z,l.m(function(e){A[m]=e;h(e)},v),r&&!E&&t?(y.push([e,l]),H&&(e.N="text/cache",D(e,function(e){e&&e.parentNode.removeChild(e)},function(){}),e.N="")):(t=t||r,C(e,l)))},cramPlugin:".."+"/"+"cram/js"}})})(this,this.document,function(l){try{return eval(l)}catch(p){}});define("curl/plugin/domReady",[".."+"/"+"domReady"],function(l){return{load:function(p,v,x){l(x)}}});}).call(this);[].slice.apply(document.querySelectorAll('figure.interactive[data-interactive]')).forEach(function(el){require([el.getAttribute('data-interactive')],function(interactive){interactive.boot(el,document,window.guardian.config);},function(err){console.log('Interactive failed',mainJS);console.log('Error:',err);});require(['ophan/ng'],function(ophan){var a=el.querySelector('a');var href=a&&a.href;if(href){ophan.trackComponentAttention(href,el);}});[].slice.apply(document.querySelectorAll('iframe.interactive-atom-fence')).forEach(function(el){var srcdoc;if(!el.srcdoc){srcdoc=el.getAttribute('srcdoc');el.contentWindow.contents=srcdoc;el.src='javascript:window["contents"]';}});}); const pillar='Opinion';(function(){function convertContentType(contentType){var result=contentType;if(typeof contentType==='string'){result=contentType.toLowerCase().split(' ').join('');}return result;}function getQueryParam(key){var query=window.WB_wombat_location.search.substring(1);var vars=query.split("&");var pairs=vars.map(function(x){return x.split('=')});return pairs.filter(function(xs){return xs.length==2&&xs[0]==key}).map(function(xs){return xs[1]})[0];}function getAnalyticsEdition(){var edition=(guardian.config.page.edition||'').toLowerCase() return edition==='int'?'international':edition;}function getAnalyticsTitle(){var analyticsTitle=(guardian.config.page.webTitle||'');return(analyticsTitle==='Network Front')?getAnalyticsEdition()+' network front':analyticsTitle;}function getExperienceValue(){return'none';}var identityId=null;if(guardian.config.user){identityId=guardian.config.user.id;}var isLoggedIn=(!!identityId).toString();(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');ga('create','UA-78705427-1','auto','allEditorialPropertyTracker',{'sampleRate':100,'siteSpeedSampleRate':0.1,'userId':identityId});ga('create','UA-33592456-1','auto','guardianTestPropertyTracker',{'sampleRate':5,'siteSpeedSampleRate':0.1,'userId':identityId});ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','forceSSL',true);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','title',getAnalyticsTitle());ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','anonymizeIp',true);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension1',guardian.config.ophan.pageViewId);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension2',guardian.config.ophan.browserId);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension3','theguardian.com');ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension4',guardian.config.page.section);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension5',convertContentType(guardian.config.page.contentType));ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension6',guardian.config.page.commissioningDesks);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension7',guardian.config.page.contentId);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension8',guardian.config.page.authorIds);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension9',guardian.config.page.keywordIds);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension10',guardian.config.page.toneIds);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension11',guardian.config.page.seriesId);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension15',identityId);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension16',isLoggedIn);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension21',getQueryParam('INTCMP'));ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension22',getQueryParam('CMP_BUNIT'));ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension23',getQueryParam('CMP_TU'));ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension26',(!!guardian.config.page.isHosted).toString());ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension27',navigator.userAgent);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension29',window.WB_wombat_location.href);ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension30',getAnalyticsEdition());ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension43',getExperienceValue());ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','dimension50',pillar);if(document.WB_wombat_location.hash==='#fbLogin'){ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.set','referrer',null);document.WB_wombat_location.hash='';}ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','forceSSL',true);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','title',getAnalyticsTitle());ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','anonymizeIp',true);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension1',guardian.config.ophan.pageViewId);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension2',guardian.config.ophan.browserId);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension3','theguardian.com');ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension4',guardian.config.page.section);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension5',convertContentType(guardian.config.page.contentType));ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension6',guardian.config.page.commissioningDesks);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension7',guardian.config.page.contentId);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension8',guardian.config.page.authorIds);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension9',guardian.config.page.keywordIds);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension10',guardian.config.page.toneIds);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension11',guardian.config.page.seriesId);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension15',identityId);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension16',isLoggedIn);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension21',getQueryParam('INTCMP'));ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension22',getQueryParam('CMP_BUNIT'));ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension23',getQueryParam('CMP_TU'));ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension26',(!!guardian.config.page.isHosted).toString());ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension27',navigator.userAgent);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension29',window.WB_wombat_location.href);ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension30',getAnalyticsEdition());ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension43',getExperienceValue());ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','dimension50',pillar);if(document.WB_wombat_location.hash==='#fbLogin'){ga('guardianTestPropertyTracker.set','referrer',null);document.WB_wombat_location.hash='';}ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.send','pageview',{hitCallback:function(){var image=new Image();image.src="//phar.gu-web.net/count/pvg.gif";}});try{var NG_STORAGE_KEY='gu.analytics.referrerVars';var referrerVarsData=window.sessionStorage.getItem(NG_STORAGE_KEY);var referrerVars=JSON.parse(referrerVarsData);if(referrerVars&&referrerVars.value){var d=new Date().getTime();if(d-referrerVars.value.time<60*1000){ga('allEditorialPropertyTracker.send','event','Click','Internal',referrerVars.value.tag,{nonInteraction:true,dimension12:referrerVars.value.path});}window.sessionStorage.removeItem(NG_STORAGE_KEY);}}catch(e){}guardian.app&&guardian.app.mediator&&guardian.app.mediator.emit('modules:ga:ready');})(); <img id="googleConfidenceNoScriptImage" alt="" src="//via.hypothes.is/im_///phar.gu-web.net/count/pvg.gif" width="1" height="1" class="u-h"/> var _comscore=_comscore||[];_comscore.push({c1:"2",c2:"6035250",comscorekw:guardian.config.page.keywords});(function(){var s=document.createElement("script"),el=document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];s.async=true;s.src="https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js";el.parentNode.insertBefore(s,el);})(); <img src="https://via.hypothes.is/im_/https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=6035250&cv=2.0&cj=1&comscorekw=Rail+fares%2CTransport+policy%2CTransport%2CPolitics"/> <div style="display:inline;"> <img height="1" width="1" style="border-style:none;" alt="" src="//via.hypothes.is/im_///googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/viewthroughconversion/971225648/?value=0&amp;guid=ON&amp;script=0"/> </div> !function(e,t,n,s,u,a){e.twq||(s=e.twq=function(){s.exe?s.exe.apply(s,arguments):s.queue.push(arguments);},s.version='1.1',s.queue=[],u=t.createElement(n),u.async=!0,u.src='//static.ads-twitter.com/uwt.js',a=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0],a.parentNode.insertBefore(u,a))}(window,document,'script');twq('init','nyl43');twq('track','PageView');  

      claimed that " a better, cheaper more effective service for the commuter", what is the ideology in there?

  11. Feb 2019
    1. For that reason, “overuse” of the internet and social media today may not be such a bad thing. It is our primary way of exploring all of the potential of that cultural mode, and that mode will at some point be tamed and neutered, just as Baroque music composition is now dormant.

      I don't think that we can so easily equate a Baroque music fad with internet & social media addiction - it feels like a genuinely different mode of human interaction that is causing large, potentially negative changes in our societies at a core level.

    1. “He has only two thousand pounds of his own; it would be madness to marry upon that, though for my own part I could give up every prospect of more without a sigh. I have been always used to a very small income, and could struggle with any poverty for him; but I love him too well to be the selfish means of robbing him, perhaps, of all that his mother might give him if he married to please her. We must wait, it may be for many years. With almost every other man in the world, it would be an alarming prospect; but Edward’s affection and constancy nothing can deprive me of, I know.”

      As someone previously noted, the position of Edwards income is equivalent to about enough for one to live off of for a year, it was not nearly enough money to live the lifestyle that was so typically sought after by social classes. Even those who live a middle class lifestyle fantasize about having more money to spend as we saw the sisters talk about in previous chapters. Money was the most important part of societal class and how you ranked in life. The fact that this amount of money Edward has alone would not be enough to secure a future is important. Edward relies on his mother as Lucy notes this just before this passage I've chosen. Lucy insists that she is used to living a simple life and her love for him could not stop them from being together. I can't help but read this as Austen mocking Lucy's true character or perhaps it is the true Lucy just trying to deter her competition? I think there is much to be said for this passage although I'm not totally quite able to point my finger on Austen's intentions just yet. I do think its worth taking note of as Lucy's character begins to develop more through the story.

    1. Virtual-reality sickness (also known as cybersickness) is a side-effect experienced by some when using VR. Symptoms are similar to those of motion sickness, including nausea, disorientation, pallor, headaches, sweating and even vomiting. It’s widely thought that this is caused by a conflict taking place within the brain. Despite technological improvements, cybersickness is still experienced by some when viewing virtual reality © Getty Your visual and auditory sensory inputs tell you that you’re moving through space, whereas your inner ear doesn’t detect the corresponding motion. Similarly to motion sickness, the ‘area postrema’ in the brain senses this conflict, assumes you’re hallucinating after accidentally ingesting a neurotoxin and tells your body to eject the offending substance post-haste. This phenomenon is more likely to affect children between two and 12 years, which is why some VR unit manufacturers advise caution or even for their units to be used only by children of 13 and over. Thankfully, many of these short-term side effects have been reduced by technological developments over the last few years and will continue to do so as time rolls by. Increased resolution and screen refresh rates have had a positive impact, as has game design itself, with developers gaining a deeper understanding of what makes a truly immersive and stable VR experience. Rat reality Research is, however, being carried out to uncover whether the impact VR has on the brain is more significant than the superficial symptoms of cybersickness. Professor Mayank Mehta and his colleagues at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) have been conducting experiments to explore the effects of VR on the brains of rats. Experiments on rodents show VR activates less neurons than true reality. But, say the researchers, it’s too early to draw any concrete conclusions © UCLA By building an environment in which the animals can explore a virtual space on treadmills, the team have been able to monitor activity in the hippocampus – an area of the brain important for spatial awareness, learning and memory. They found that around half the neurons that fire in a real-world environment simply shut down when in VR. Research is ongoing to what impact this may have on the brain, but it at least intimates that the industry and researchers are taking the issue of VR and physical and mental healthy seriously. Social immobility Truly understanding the long-term neurological impact of VR in humans will take time, but what of the social ramifications? We’ve already seen the dangers that immersive gaming can pose in the MMO world, with isolation and reclusive behaviour, depression, suicide and even virtual-world conflicts spilling over into real-world violence. One of the key concerns of VR use is how the user manages the return to reality from these exciting VR worlds © Getty There was even the 2008 case of a Russian man dying after becoming embroiled in conflict resulting from the (virtual) death of one of the members of his game. A physical violent brawl ensued and the man died. Although such extremes tend to be rare, they do happen, and the introduction of VR into mainstream culture means that unexpected social problems will inevitably come to light. Having spent a lot of time in VR ourselves, one of the most peculiar sensations isn’t being in the virtual world itself, but the act of removing the headset at the end of the session, which is followed by the dull thud as you return to a comparatively beige reality, devoid of the wonder and boundlessness of the synthetic. It’s all too easy to see how, as the technology advances with ever greater velocity, users young and old will become ever-more reluctant to return to reality. Imagine trying to get a teenager to do their homework when they’re busy in the cockpit of an X-Wing, taking down the Death Star single-handedly. You’ll need more than Jedi mind tricks for that one. This escapism isn’t just limited to gaming. As with so many technological developments, much will be driven by the porn and sex industry. Teledildonic sex (remote sexual activity) is already bedding in, as products that allow partners many miles apart to control mechanical sex toys in real time are flying off the shelves. Combined with VR and social media, this opens up a whole new frontier of sexual exploration. That’s fair game for liberal, single individuals but what ethical rules apply if you have a partner and are having a virtual sexual encounter with a digital avatar? Perhaps it will simply be up to each and every individual, but it’ll only be a matter of time before such cases are raised in court. Try 3 issues from just $9.95 Promoted by Science Focus .str-adunit-article .thumbnail-wrapper{height:95px !important;}.str-advertiser{color:#c4218c !important;font-size:14px !important;line-height:1rem !important;margin-bottom:5px !important;}@media only screen and (max-width:500px){.str-adunit-article{width:100% !important;max-width:none !important;}.str-adunit-article .thumbnail-wrapper,.str-adunit-article .str-thumbnail{width:70px !important;height:70px !important;}.str-adunit-article .str-text{padding:0 0 0 10px !important;vertical-align:top !important;}} Into the unknown As is so often the case with new technology, there are many unknowns. Further studies into how VR impacts brain function are required to understand the potential pros and cons, while discourse on the social implications of the technology is equally important. Like most things in life there are potential risks but, used wisely, virtual reality will bring positive experiences to millions. Clinicians continue to research the potential side-effects of time spent in VR © specialeffect.org.uk Even now, organisations like the charity Special Effect, who develop and supply video-game control systems for people with disabilities, are taking advantage of the latest technology. As founder Dr Mick Donegan suggests, these systems “could allow people with severe mobility challenges, even those who are completely paralysed, the opportunity to ‘move freely’ in both the real and virtual worlds”. And it’s through applications like this that VR will truly unlock its full potential, regardless of the possible downsides. Follow Science Focus on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Flipboard Facebook White twitter White Page 1 Page 1 Email White Tags Future tech Virtual reality Latest Photo overlay Nature Underwater photography | 39 stunning photos from the UPY 2019 competition Magazine Focus Magazine Collection | The Ultimate Guide to the Solar System Space What would happen if there were no Moon? The Human Body Aphantasia | Life with no mind's eye Want to be updated when there is Science Focus news? Thanks! Our best wishes for a productive day. Email Address Sign up By clicking “sign up” you are agreeing to our terms and conditions. You can unsubscribe at any time. For more information about how to do this, and how Immediate Media Company Limited (publisher of Science Focus) holds your personal information, please see our privacy policy.

      This is very interesting, ever since we have been learning about VR I haven't thought much about the negative effects of VR. These side-effects are much more intense than I would ever imagined and now has a large impact on my thinking of the use of VR, I don't think they're worth these symptoms.

    1. We might think about digital redlining as the process by which different schools get differential journal access.

      This is not about differential access. It is about paying for the subscription. If you can pay for it, then you will get the access. So essentially it is about funding. And it not based on racial differences etc., but rather funding. Public schools may not have adequate funding to pay for it. That is a problem of public funding not race.

    1. Often overly studious or perfectionistic youth believe it is reasonable to study for hours on end, to keep their bedroom as neat as a pin, or to wash their hands excessively after every activity. Other youth think there is something “wrong” with them. Children may focus on the physical symptoms of anxiety (e.g. stomachaches). Teens may think they’re weird, weak, out of control, or even going crazy! These thoughts might make them feel even more anxious and self-conscious

      I do not think there are enough advocates to inform students, parents, and educators the long-term effects of GAD. The anxiety behaviours work for the student at the time (i.e. overly studious, perfectionist, etc.) because they get good grades and they might get attention for that. But, personally speaking, the effects that hit in the forties after living a lifetime of this takes its toll. I love that we are learning about advocating for students struggling from anxiety instead of poo-pooing it for so long. LM

    1. the majority reported feeling anxious during school. Most also reported that their anxiety usually or always interfered with their daily school functioning.

      As an educator, I'm aware that anxiety is prevalent, however I don't always think about how much it affects or interferes with a student's ability to function and succeed academically. This article shows pretty clearly that anxiety is affecting students consistently and that what we consider 'work habits', or organization, may just be a symptom of anxiety.

    1. This supplemented the individual's memory and ability to visualize. (We are not concerned here with the value derived from human cooperation made possible by speech and writing, both forms of external symbol manipulation. We speak of the manual means of making graphical representations of symbols—

      The expression "manual means of making graphical representation" makes me think of photography as a memory aid or augmenting tool. Although, of course, it would not necessarily refer to a symbolic portrayal.

      Interestingly, neuroscience today affirms our memory is far from a simple pointing to the past function, but it actually alters or edits the memory itself each time we go back to it and probably the subject who remembers changes in the process. Could that be an example of how technological aids can augment our brain processing of memories?

      I have recently explored this idea on my blog in a post called As We May Remember (a wink to the Vannebar Bush essay) http://eltnotes.blogspot.com/2019/02/as-we-may-remember.html

    1. Role of Government in Private Employment Relationships For this discussion consider the following questions and create your initial post: • Do you think that the state government and the IRS should audit employee/IC matters? • If an individual is OK with being an Independent Contractor, even if under the law, he is an employee, does it matter? • Is this an example of the state interfering too much in private relationships between parties? • What is your role in HR in enforcing these laws? Your initial discussion board post must use at least one resource as support. This resource may be your textbook, required readings for the course, or outside research. Use APA citation format to properly credit your supporting material. There is no minimum word limit for the post, but you should be sure that you completely and thoroughly respond to all the questions in the post. You should also include a descriptive subject line in this initial post. • Post on time. It is noted when the postings (initial and follow-up) are made and late postings are noted when considering grades.<br> • Be active during the week. If all of your postings are made on one day (like Sunday evening for follow-up posts), you will not receive the same grade as someone who is active in the forums during the week and contributes regularly to the discussions. The forums are only as good as you make them, and regular, thoughtful contributions are necessary to get the most out of them. • Follow-up posts are more than just agreeing or adding your opinion. Examine and analyze what your classmates are saying and elaborate on that. Adding examples is helpful, but the best posts are those that add to the discussion with further analysis or elaboration. • Challenge and question (of course respectfully, which I don't doubt that everyone will do). We all have different views and opinions, and often can learn a lot from those who see the world differently than we do. Disagree with what other say too. Those type of posts can lead to very interesting discussion. More than just the posts that say "I agree." • You are encouraged to participate fully in the discussion forums throughout the week, posting early and often. There is no minimum number of response posts that you must post. Research has shown that with adult learners such as you in a graduate level course, requirements such as posting two responses actually leads to less interaction and communication than if no requirements of a minimum number of posts are in place. If you have any questions about this policy, please contact me so we can discuss it to ensure you feel confident about your coursework and your participation. • The initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Wednesday each week; the response posts for that week are due by 11:59 pm on Sunday of each week. • Feel free to return to past weeks if you were unable to comment on as many posts as you would have liked, or if you simply have some additional time and want to refer back to what was discussed. Respond to your classmates as well. • We all juggle many different roles and jobs, beyond that of student. Thus, some weeks you may be able to check the forum and respond to your classmates on a daily basis, while other weeks you might have less time available and only check the forum twice during the week. At the end of the course, your overall participation (including not only the number of posts but also the quality of them) will be considered when awarding a grade. If you have any questions about this policy, please contact me so we can discuss it to ensure you feel confident about your coursework and your participation.

    1. That means that — taken on their own — combustion vehicle sales fell from 17.03 million in 2017 to 16.91 million in 2018.Since USA total light vehicle sales have been essentially flat or slightly declining over the past four years, and EVs are now coming online in ever-increasing volumes, it’s hard to see gas vehicle sales going in any direction but south from now on. The total light vehicle market’s marginal growth in 2018 was only made possible by the arrival of the Tesla Model 3 in high volumes.Again, there’s an outside chance we may see a small up-blip, depending on the economic outlook, but that’s unlikely and the general trend for combustion vehicle sales is inexorably downwards. The reveal of the Tesla Model Y in the coming month or two also ensures that a significant number of folks will entirely avoid a gas vehicle purchase in the next year or so whilst they are waiting for their dream SUV/crossover. Again, this means that EV % market share will grow at a higher rate than the increase in absolute EV sales volume, as the competition withers away.The Global PictureSince the three largest auto markets are already seeing falling combustion vehicle sales, is there any hope left for the internal combustion engine?No. It’s firmly headed for the dustbin of history, and it is going to happen quickly. Most serious auto analysts (see here, and here, and here) postulated that 2018 would be the peak sales year for combustion vehicle sales globally. The figures we’ve discussed above support the idea of 2017 being the peak year.Japan is still indecisive about EVs, though big on hybrids, but will inevitably soon have to give up on its fuel-cell dreams (at least for LDVs) and rush to catch up with EV powertrains.India will grow to be a significant auto market in the middle of the next decade, but this will be too late to save the combustion engine. India’s LDV sales were some 3.2 million in 2017, growing around 9% from 2016. Both combustion sales and EV sales will continue to grow in India, but any short-term growth in combustion vehicles will be far outpaced by their decline in the 3 largest markets above (almost 20× the volume of India). India’s LDV buying middle class is really starting to buy vehicles at just the time when EVs are taking over from gassers. With many larger Indian cities having serious air quality problems to deal with, regulations will also be pushing in the direction of EVs, and away from polluting gassers. And before the middle of the next decade, EVs will be the less expensive option, even just on sticker price (they already are in many cases on total cost of ownership).New Delhi in smogWhat do you think about the prospects for combustion engine vehicles? Do you agree that we will look back on 2017 as the peak in these three largest markets, or will 2019 reverse the past year’s declines and see them clinging onto sales volume for another year or so? Please share you thoughts and reasoning in the comments.Related: Nissan, Toyota, Mercedes, VW, Honda, BMW, Lexus, Infiniti, & Audi Sales Drop In USA, While Ford & GM Hide    (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});   How much money can a solar roof save you in California? Profit from your roof space: find local deals on solar in your area, eliminate your power bill. Calculate My Savings! .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_copy_zip, .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_copy_zip { padding-left: 110px !important; overflow: hidden; font-size: 10px !important; } .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_img, .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_img { display: block !important; width: 100px !important; } .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_copy_zip { height: 83px !important; } .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_zip_button { top: 143px !important; } .px400 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_input { top: 87px !important; } .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_wrapper_picture_input, .px300 #wapp_signup_widget_zip_button { width: 267px !important; } Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)1K+Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)1K+Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)MoreClick to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)1Click to share on Flipboard (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Tags: China EV sales, Death of the combustion engine, End of oil, Europe EV sales, EV sales, Rise of the EV, Tesla, US EV sales About the AuthorDr. Maximilian Holland Max is an anthropologist, social theorist and international political economist, trying to ask questions and encourage critical thinking about social and environmental justice, sustainability and the human condition. He has lived and worked in Europe and Asia, and is currently based in Barcelona. Related Posts Hyundai Kona EV Review … Tesla Model 3 #1 Electric Car In World … Elon, Like A Boss — #CleanTechnica Top 20 → Top 10 Best Selling Fully Electric Vehicle Brands In 2019 → Top 10 Best Selling Plug-In Vehicle Brands In 2019 → Beta Technologies Pops Out Of Stealth, Is Gearing Up To Be More Than An eVTOL Startup → Back to Top ↑AdvertisementAdvertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of our readers.CleanTechnica Clothing & Cups Top News On CleanTechnica The Tesla Model 3 Is Taking Over The World Boom! Fossil Vehicle Sales Are Officially Now Decreasing In China, Europe, & USA — #CleanTechnica Report 12 Ways of Looking at a Rivian vs Tesla Matchup Volkswagen Raises EV Sales Target 50%, Says ID Production Will Be Carbon Neutral The Dream Is Over — Europe Is Waking Up To A World Of Electric Cars Hyundai Kona EV Review ... Tesla Model 3 #1 Electric Car In World ... Elon, Like A Boss — #CleanTechnica Top 20 Yes, Electric Vehicles Work In Winter — Better Than Gas Cars! Join CleanTechnica Today!AdvertisementAdvertisementFollow CleanTechnica !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");Our Electric Car Driver Report  Read & share our new report on "electric car drivers, what they desire, and what the demand."The EV Safety AdvantageRead & share our free report on EV safety, “The EV Safety Advantage.”EV Charging Guidelines for CitiesShare our free report on EV charging guidelines for cities, “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Guidelines For Cities.”30 Electric Car Benefits Our Electric Vehicle ReviewsTesla NewsCleantech Press Releases New Research Shows That Only Two Large Petroleum Companies Have Meaningful Emission Reduction Targets Koben Announces EVOLVE EVSF —Grid-Friendly Modular EV Store & Forward System The New Danish Climate Plan — Together For A Greener Future38 Anti-Cleantech Myths Wind & Solar Prices Beat Fossils Cost of Solar Panels Collapses

      360/200 is nearly double, 180% increase

    1. He came down the road with cigarette in his hand. I waved at him; he smiled at me and threw away the almost finished cigarette inhaling the last puff. As we sat down to talk, he lit up another cigarette; with its smoke surrounding us he began his story. “I was 12 when I took a puff of my first cigarette. My brothers used to smoke a lot and asked me if I wanted to try, so I tried to just cool among them. I didn’t know that smoking was injurious to health back then, I know it’s bad for my health now but I don’t want to quit , I don’t think it’s doing me any harm like alcohol. I used to go far from my home to buy cigarettes and smoke. I got habituated after a year, first I wanted to look cool and now it’s like daily ritual of my life. I light up a cigarette as soon as I wake up and may be finish a packet per day,” said Luke* , who is now a 23 year -old man.

      The writer gives us a quick little memory about an experience he has had with smoking in Nepal. It gives us somewhat of an incentive for this article.

    1. Increase Font Size Toggle Menu HomeReadSign in Search in book: Search Contents I. The Middle Ages (ca. 476-1485) 1. Bede (ca. 672-735) Bede: BiographyCaedmon’s Hymn 2. Dream of the Rood Dream of the Rood 3. Beowulf: Parts I & II Introduction: BeowulfStory SummaryThemesHistorical BackgroundLiterary StyleReading:Part IPart II 4. Beowulf: Part III Part III 5. Judith  Judith6. The Wanderer 7. Wulf and Eadwacer Wulf and Eadwacer 8. The Wife's Lament The Wife’s Lament 9. The Ruin The Ruin 10. Selection of Old English Riddles Selections from Old English Poems 11. The Myth of Arthur's Return Geoffrey of Monmouth: From The History of the Kings of BritainWace: From Roman de BrutLayamon: From Brut  II. Irish Literature 12. Cúchulainn’s Boyish Deeds Cúchulainn: IntroductionCuchulainn’s Boyish Deeds III. Anglo-Norman Literature 13. Tristan and Iseult Introduction: Tristan and IseultThe Story SummaryLiterary ThemesReading: Tristan and Yseult 14. Guide for Anchoresses (Ancrene Wisse) The Sweetness and Pain of Enclosure15. Romances of Marie de France IV. Middle English Literature in the 14th and 15th Century 16. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (ca. 1375-1400) 17. Sir Gawain: Parts I & II Part IPart II 18. Sir Gawain: Parts III & IV Part IIIPart IV19. Geoffrey Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales 20. Canterbury Tales: General Prologue Prologue 21. Canterbury Tales: Miller's Prologue and Tale The Miller’s PrologueThe Miller’s Tale22. Canterbury Tales: The Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale23. Canterbury Tales: The Pardoner's Prologue and Tale24. Canterbury Tales: The Nun's Priest's Tale25. Canterbury Tales: Close of Canterbury Tales26. Julian of Norwich: Revelations of Divine Love (Selections) 27. Margery Kempe: Excerpts from The Book of Margery Kempe The Birth of Her First Child and Her First VisionHer Pride and Attempts to Start a Business28. The Wakefield Second Shepherd's Play29. Middle English Lyrics30. Robert Henryson: The Cock and the Jasp31. Everyman32. Thomas Malory: Le Morte d'Arthur V. The Sixteenth Century 33. Sir Thomas More: Utopia UTOPIA34. From: The Book of Common Prayer 35. WOMEN IN POWER: Selected Readings Mary I (Tudor)Lady Jane GreyMary Queen of ScotsElizabeth I36. Edmund Spencer: the Faerie Queene (Book I) 37. Sir Walter Raleigh: Poems and From: The Discovery of the Large, Rich and Beautiful Empire of Guiana Poems38. Sir Philip Sidney: From Astrophil and Stella 39. THE WIDER WORLD: Selected Readings The Wider World: Selected Readings Hakluyt’s Dedicatory Epistle to The Principal Navigations, 1589Leo Africanus on the North Africans, 1526An English Traveller’s Guide to the North Africans, 1547Voyage to the Arctic, 1577, with Reflections on Racial DifferenceAmadas and Barlowe’s Voyage to Virginia, 1584Hariot’s Report on Virginia, 1585General History of the Turks, 1603 40. Christopher Marlowe: Hero and Leander Hero and Leander 41. Christopher Marlowe: Doctor Faustus The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus 42. William Shakespeare: Selected Sonnets Selected Sonnets 43. William Shakespeare: Taming of the Shrew THE TAMING OF THE SHREW VI. Early Seventeenth Century 44. John Dunne: Selections Songs and SonnetsA Selection of Holy SonnetsFrom: Devotions upon Emergent Occasions45. Aemilia Lanyar: Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum 46. Ben Jonson: Epigrams and Poetry EpigramsPoemsFrom: Underwood 47. GENDER RELATIONS: Conflict and Counsel From: The Arraignment of Lewd, Idle, Froward, and Unconstant Women: Or the Vanity of Them Choose you WhetherRachel Speght: From A Muzzle for Melastomus William Gouge: From Domestical Duties48. Francis Bacon: Essays49. Margaret Cavendish: The Blazing World 50. George Herbert: The Temple The Temple 51. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: The Beheading of Charles I From: King Charles, His Trial (1649)From: A Perfect Diurnal of Some Passages in Parliament, no. 288Robert Filmer: From Patriarcha John Milton: From The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates Gerrard Winstanley: From A New Year’s Gift Sent to the Parliament and ArmyThomas Hobbes: From Leviathan 52. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: Political Writing Robert Filmer: From Patriarcha John Milton: From The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates Gerrard Winstanley: From A New Year’s Gift Sent to the Parliament and ArmyThomas Hobbes: From Leviathan 53. CRISIS OF AUTHORITY: Writing the Self Lucy Hutchinson: From Memoirs of the Life of Colonel John HutchinsonEdward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon: From The History of the RebellionLady Anne Halkett: From The Memoires 54. John Milton: Poems and Sonnets LycidasSonnets 55. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 1-3) BOOK 1BOOK 2BOOK 3 56. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 4-6) BOOK 4BOOK 5BOOK 6 57. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 7-9) BOOK 7BOOK 8BOOK 9 58. John Milton: Paradise Lost (Books 10-12) BOOK 10BOOK 11BOOK 12 Appendix An Open Companion for British Literature I 13 Tristan and Iseult Introduction: Tristan and Iseult by Noel Wallace Tristan and Isolde by Herbert James Draper (1863-1920). Wikimedia Commons. The story of Tristan and Iseult is an Anglo-Norman story of a love between two tragic lovers fated to be set apart.  The origins of the original text are unknown adding to the mystery of the story. There are also many different versions of the story. Each version just a little different. For clarity purposes of this paper, I will refer to the French version by Joseph Bedier. How daring the legend. How legendary. How incredibly naive. However, are not all young lovers naive? For it takes time to develop skepticism. Cynicism does not belong in the beginning of a story. It only belongs in the end. The lovers begin as two innocent and hopeful characters. Tristan represents the embodiment of all that is chivalrous. The desire to do only what is right by the laws his society. As the novel progresses, the audience will begin to question things as the characters change. At the very end both characters will die tragically apart. Both will have become cynical and heartbroken. Perhaps, you have heard of the two young lovers yourself? Perhaps you have heard how the tragedy of the poisonous wine brought about death and destruction? Was the wine an element of foreshadow? Maybe you are just looking for a great read. Either way the story of the two lovers will indeed be of interest. The Story Summary Set in the medieval era, this is the story of Tristan and Iseult and their tragic love affair. The story begins in Tristan’s childhood and covers a series of youthful adventures which shape him into a Knight. Then Tristan embarks on his biggest quest yet. He journeys to Ireland to obtain Princess Iseult. The plan was to bring the princess back to Ireland to marry King Mark of Cornwall. However, the Queen of Ireland was concerned for her daughter’s wellbeing and concocted an eternal love potion to be consumed by King Mark and Princess Iseult. Accidently Tristan and Iseult consume the potion and fall in love. King Mark and Iseult marry despite the potion. However, Tristan and Iseult are still in love. Though keeping pure, the two often meet in secret. King Mark eventually find out and banishes Tristan. Tristan goes off to another land and finds favor in a new king, marrying his daughter. Despite this Tristan still desperately loves Iseult and she him. In the final chapter Tristan falls ill after an ambus. He sends a messenger to retrieve Iseult the fair. However, he dies before she reaches him. Upon discovering Tristan’s death Iseult dies too. Literary Themes The story of Tristan and Iseult is filled with many themes. Morality was a common element in medieval literature. Thus, one can interpret many moral themes throughout the content. A few examples of these themes include: loyalty, love, fate, courage, and judgement. The theme of love is shown so many times. One could argue that if you took the theme of love out, there would be no story. How can you have a tragic love story without love? There is motherly love, fatherly love, romantic love, and love of a duty. Queen Blanchefleur demonstrates motherly love in that of her new born baby. King Mark, Rohalt, and Squire Gorvenal demonstrate fatherly love. Tristan and Iseult’s relationship demonstrate romantic love. Lastly, one can see love of duty in the actions of Tristan when he gives up his romantic love for a love of duty to King Mark. Another theme is loyalty. Tristan is constantly loyal to Mark even when Mark is not loyal in return. Mark betrays Tristan by allowing his advisors to manipulate his mind. Loyalty is even seen as soon in the story as the second paragraph when King Rivalen of Lyonesse comes to the aid of his ally, Mark of Cornwall. “When Mark was King over Cornwall, Rivalen, King of Lyonesse, heard that Mark’s enemies waged war on him; so, he crossed the sea to bring him aid (page 1).” The themes of Fate and judgement go together. This leads to the idea if something is truly fated, then how can one be judged? Works Cited: “Author ProfileJoseph Bedier.” PublicBookshelf, www.publicbookshelf.com/author/Joseph-Bedier. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Tristan and Isolde.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 8 Feb. 2012, www.britannica.com/topic/Tristan-and-Isolde. “Joseph Bédier.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 14 Nov. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Bédier. “Tristan and Iseult.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 18 Jan. 2019, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tristan and Iseult. “Tristan and Isolde.” Myths Encyclopedia, www.mythencyclopedia.com/Tr-Wa/Tristan-and-Isolde.html. Draper, Herbert James. Tristan and Isolde. 1901, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert James Draper. Discussion Questions: Fate vs. accident: If Tristan and Iseult were fated to be together was it really the wine causing them to fall in love? If fate were in play and there was no wine, would they not have fallen in love anyway? A titanic question: Why do you think that Tristan and Iseult choose to stay in the woods rather than return to Ireland or Lyonesse? A perspective switch: Was King Mark a villain? Judgement Question: The hermit of Ogrin begged Tristan and Iseult to give penance under the laws of Rome for what he saw as a sin. However later Iseult is declared innocent by the hot-iron test. Give an example today that society may see as one thing as a sin, but may not be. Was Tristan wrong to return Iseult to Mark after he sent her to the lepers? At what point, would you consider a relationship over? Further Resources for Students: Fab Audio Books. “Tristan and Isolde: complete unabridged audiobook.” Youtube.com 17 Sept. 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OelPOx-Xg5c&t=4s   WLMi5514. “Tristan and Isolde (2006) Trailer.” Youtube.com 24 Feb 2010 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAJJay0Uv4M   WagneroperaNET. “Leonard Bernstein: Tristan und Isolde, Vorspiel Act 1.” Youtube.com 12 Jan. 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa7Wo8PkpBs   Carls, Alice-Catherine. “Love in the Last Days: After Tristan and Iseult.” World Literature Today, vol. 92, no. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 86–87. EBSCOhost, lsproxy.austincc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lsproxy.austincc.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lfh&AN=128273558&site=eds-live&scope=site. http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.lsproxy.austincc.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=29ca0eca-ebb3-4339-88f3-a9326f4cf7c2%40sessionmgr4008&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=lfh&AN=128273558&anchor=TextToSpeech Reading: Tristan and Yseult PART THE FIRST THE CHILDHOOD OF TRISTAN My lords, if you would hear a high tale of love and of death, here is that of Tristan and Queen Iseult; how to their full joy, but to their sorrow also, they loved each other, and how at last they died of that love together upon one day; she by him and he by her. Long ago, when Mark was King over Cornwall, Rivalen, King of Lyonesse, heard that Mark’s enemies waged war on him; so he crossed the sea to bring him aid; and so faithfully did he serve him with counsel and sword that Mark gave him his sister Blanchefleur, whom King Rivalen loved most marvellously. He wedded her in Tintagel Minster, but hardly was she wed when the news came to him that his old enemy Duke Morgan had fallen on Lyonesse and was wasting town and field. Then Rivalen manned his ships in haste, and took Blanchefleur with him to his far land; but she was with child. He landed below his castle of Kanoël and gave the Queen in ward to his Marshal Rohalt, and after that set off to wage his war. Blanchefleur waited for him continually, but he did not come home, till she learnt upon a day that Duke Morgan had killed him in foul ambush. She did not weep: she made no cry or lamentation, but her limbs failed her and grew weak, and her soul was filled with a strong desire to be rid of the flesh, and though Rohalt tried to soothe her she would not hear. Three days she awaited re-union with her lord, and on the fourth she brought forth a son; and taking him in her arms she said: “Little son, I have longed a while to see you, and now I see you the fairest thing ever a woman bore. In sadness came I hither, in sadness did I bring forth, and in sadness has your first feast day gone. And as by sadness you came into the world, your name shall be called Tristan; that is the child of sadness.” After she had said these words she kissed him, and immediately when she had kissed him she died. Rohalt, the keeper of faith, took the child, but already Duke Morgan’s men besieged the Castle of Kanoël all round about. There is a wise saying: “Fool-hardy was never hardy,” and he was compelled to yield to Duke Morgan at his mercy: but for fear that Morgan might slay Rivalen’s heir the Marshal hid him among his own sons. When seven years were passed and the time had come to take the child from the women, Rohalt put Tristan under a good master, the Squire Gorvenal, and Gorvenal taught him in a few years the arts that go with barony. He taught him the use of lance and sword and ’scutcheon and bow, and how to cast stone quoits and to leap wide dykes also: and he taught him to hate every lie and felony and to keep his given word; and he taught him the various kinds of song and harp-playing, and the hunter’s craft; and when the child rode among the young squires you would have said that he and his horse and his armour were all one thing. To see him so noble and so proud, broad in the shoulders, loyal, strong and right, all men glorified Rohalt in such a son. But Rohalt remembering Rivalen and Blanchefleur (of whose youth and grace all this was a resurrection) loved him indeed as a son, but in his heart revered him as his lord. Now all his joy was snatched from him on a day when certain merchants of Norway, having lured Tristan to their ship, bore him off as a rich prize, though Tristan fought hard, as a young wolf struggles, caught in a gin. But it is a truth well proved, and every sailor knows it, that the sea will hardly bear a felon ship, and gives no aid to rapine. The sea rose and cast a dark storm round the ship and drove it eight days and eight nights at random, till the mariners caught through the mist a coast of awful cliffs and sea-ward rocks whereon the sea would have ground their hull to pieces: then they did penance, knowing that the anger of the sea came of the lad, whom they had stolen in an evil hour, and they vowed his deliverance and got ready a boat to put him, if it might be, ashore: then the wind, and sea fell and the sky shone, and as the Norway ship grew small in the offing, a quiet tide cast Tristan and the boat upon a beach of sand. Painfully he climbed the cliff and saw, beyond, a lonely rolling heath and a forest stretching out and endless. And he wept, remembering Gorvenal, his father, and the land of Lyonesse. Then the distant cry of a hunt, with horse and hound, came suddenly and lifted his heart, and a tall stag broke cover at the forest edge. The pack and the hunt streamed after it with a tumult of cries and winding horns, but just as the hounds were racing clustered at the haunch, the quarry turned to bay at a stones throw from Tristan; a huntsman gave him the thrust, while all around the hunt had gathered and was winding the kill. But Tristan, seeing by the gesture of the huntsman that he made to cut the neck of the stag, cried out: “My lord, what would you do? Is it fitting to cut up so noble a beast like any farm-yard hog? Is that the custom of this country?” And the huntsman answered: “Fair friend, what startles you? Why yes, first I take off the head of a stag, and then I cut it into four quarters and we carry it on our saddle bows to King Mark, our lord: So do we, and so since the days of the first huntsmen have done the Cornish men. If, however, you know of some nobler custom, teach it us: take this knife and we will learn it willingly.” Then Tristan kneeled and skinned the stag before he cut it up, and quartered it all in order leaving the crow-bone all whole, as is meet, and putting aside at the end the head, the haunch, the tongue and the great heart’s vein; and the huntsmen and the kennel hinds stood over him with delight, and the Master Huntsman said: “Friend, these are good ways. In what land learnt you them? Tell us your country and your name.” “Good lord, my name is Tristan, and I learnt these ways in my country of Lyonesse.” “Tristan,” said the Master Huntsman, “God reward the father that brought you up so nobly; doubtless he is a baron, rich and strong.” Now Tristan knew both speech and silence, and he answered: “No, lord; my father is a burgess. I left his home unbeknownst upon a ship that trafficked to a far place, for I wished to learn how men lived in foreign lands. But if you will accept me of the hunt I will follow you gladly and teach you other crafts of venery.” “Fair Tristan, I marvel there should be a land where a burgess’s son can know what a knight’s son knows not elsewhere, but come with us since you will it; and welcome: we will bring you to King Mark, our lord.” Tristan completed his task; to the dogs he gave the heart, the head, offal and ears; and he taught the hunt how the skinning and the ordering should be done. Then he thrust the pieces upon pikes and gave them to this huntsman and to that to carry, to one the snout to another the haunch to another the flank to another the chine; and he taught them how to ride by twos in rank, according to the dignity of the pieces each might bear. So they took the road and spoke together, till they came on a great castle and round it fields and orchards, and living waters and fish ponds and plough lands, and many ships were in its haven, for that castle stood above the sea. It was well fenced against all assault or engines of war, and its keep, which the giants had built long ago, was compact of great stones, like a chess board of vert and azure. And when Tristan asked its name: “Good liege,” they said, “we call it Tintagel.” And Tristan cried: “Tintagel! Blessed be thou of God, and blessed be they that dwell within thee.” (Therein, my lords, therein had Rivalen taken Blanchefleur to wife, though their son knew it not.) When they came before the keep the horns brought the barons to the gates and King Mark himself. And when the Master Huntsman had told him all the story, and King Mark had marvelled at the good order of the cavalcade, and the cutting of the stag, and the high art of venery in all, yet most he wondered at the stranger boy, and still gazed at him, troubled and wondering whence came his tenderness, and his heart would answer him nothing; but, my lords, it was blood that spoke, and the love he had long since borne his sister Blanchefleur. That evening, when the boards were cleared, a singer out of Wales, a master, came forward among the barons in Hall and sang a harper’s song, and as this harper touched the strings of his harp, Tristan who sat at the King’s feet, spoke thus to him: “Oh master, that is the first of songs! The Bretons of old wove it once to chant the loves of Graëlent. And the melody is rare and rare are the words: master, your voice is subtle: harp us that well.” But when the Welshman had sung, he answered: “Boy, what do you know of the craft of music? If the burgesses of Lyonesse teach their sons harp—play also, and rotes and viols too, rise, and take this harp and show your skill.” Then Tristan took the harp and sang so well that the barons softened as they heard, and King Mark marvelled at the harper from Lyonesse whither so long ago Rivalen had taken Blanchefleur away. When the song ended, the King was silent a long space, but he said at last: “Son, blessed be the master that taught thee, and blessed be thou of God: for God loves good singers. Their voices and the voice of the harp enter the souls of men and wake dear memories and cause them to forget many a mourning and many a sin. For our joy did you come to this roof, stay near us a long time, friend.” And Tristan answered: “Very willingly will I serve you, sire, as your harper, your huntsman and your liege.” So did he, and for three years a mutual love grew up in their hearts. By day Tristan followed King Mark at pleas and in saddle; by night he slept in the royal room with the councillors and the peers, and if the King was sad he would harp to him to soothe his care. The barons also cherished him, and (as you shall learn) Dinas of Lidan, the seneschal, beyond all others. And more tenderly than the barons and than Dinas the King loved him. But Tristan could not forget, or Rohalt his father, or his master Gorvenal, or the land of Lyonesse. My lords, a teller that would please, should not stretch his tale too long, and truly this tale is so various and so high that it needs no straining. Then let me shortly tell how Rohalt himself, after long wandering by sea and land, came into Cornwall, and found Tristan, and showing the King the carbuncle that once was Blanchefleur’s, said: “King Mark, here is your nephew Tristan, son of your sister Blanchefleur and of King Rivalen. Duke Morgan holds his land most wrongfully; it is time such land came back to its lord.” And Tristan (in a word) when his uncle had armed him knight, crossed the sea, and was hailed of his father’s vassals, and killed Rivalen’s slayer and was re-seized of his land. Then remembering how King Mark could no longer live in joy without him, he summoned his council and his barons and said this: “Lords of the Lyonesse, I have retaken this place and I have avenged King Rivalen by the help of God and of you. But two men Rohalt and King Mark of Cornwall nourished me, an orphan, and a wandering boy. So should I call them also fathers. Now a free man has two things thoroughly his own, his body and his land. To Rohalt then, here, I will release my land. Do you hold it, father, and your son shall hold it after you. But my body I give up to King Mark. I will leave this country, dear though it be, and in Cornwall I will serve King Mark as my lord. Such is my judgment, but you, my lords of Lyonesse, are my lieges, and owe me counsel; if then, some one of you will counsel me another thing let him rise and speak.” But all the barons praised him, though they wept; and taking with him Gorvenal only, Tristan set sail for King Mark’s land. THE MORHOLT OUT OF IRELAND When Tristan came back to that land, King Mark and all his Barony were mourning; for the King of Ireland had manned a fleet to ravage Cornwall, should King Mark refuse, as he had refused these fifteen years, to pay a tribute his fathers had paid. Now that year this King had sent to Tintagel, to carry his summons, a giant knight; the Morholt, whose sister he had wed, and whom no man had yet been able to overcome: so King Mark had summoned all the barons of his land to Council, by letters sealed. On the day assigned, when the barons were gathered in hall, and when the King had taken his throne, the Morholt said these things: “King Mark, hear for the last time the summons of the King of Ireland, my lord. He arraigns you to pay at last that which you have owed so long, and because you have refused it too long already he bids you give over to me this day three hundred youths and three hundred maidens drawn by lot from among the Cornish folk. But if so be that any would prove by trial of combat that the King of Ireland receives this tribute without right, I will take up his wager. Which among you, my Cornish lords, will fight to redeem this land?” The barons glanced at each other but all were silent. Then Tristan knelt at the feet of King Mark and said: “Lord King, by your leave I will do battle.” And in vain would King Mark have turned him from his purpose, thinking, how could even valour save so young a knight? But he threw down his gage to the Morholt, and the Morholt took up the gage. On the appointed day he had himself clad for a great feat of arms in a hauberk and in a steel helm, and he entered a boat and drew to the islet of St. Samson’s, where the knights were to fight each to each alone. Now the Morholt had hoisted to his mast a sail of rich purple, and coming fast to land, he moored his boat on the shore. But Tristan pushed off his own boat adrift with his feet, and said: “One of us only will go hence alive. One boat will serve.” And each rousing the other to the fray they passed into the isle. No man saw the sharp combat; but thrice the salt sea-breeze had wafted or seemed to waft a cry of fury to the land, when at last towards the hour of noon the purple sail showed far off; the Irish boat appeared from the island shore, and there rose a clamour of “the Morholt!” When suddenly, as the boat grew larger on the sight and topped a wave, they saw that Tristan stood on the prow holding a sword in his hand. He leapt ashore, and as the mothers kissed the steel upon his feet he cried to the Morholt’s men: “My lords of Ireland, the Morholt fought well. See here, my sword is broken and a splinter of it stands fast in his head. Take you that steel, my lords; it is the tribute of Cornwall.” Then he went up to Tintagel and as he went the people he had freed waved green boughs, and rich cloths were hung at the windows. But when Tristan reached the castle with joy, songs and joy-bells sounding about him, he drooped in the arms of King Mark, for the blood ran from his wounds. The Morholt’s men, they landed in Ireland quite cast down. For when ever he came back into Whitehaven the Morholt had been wont to take joy in the sight of his clan upon the shore, of the Queen his sister, and of his niece Iseult the Fair. Tenderly had they cherished him of old, and had he taken some wound, they healed him, for they were skilled in balms and potions. But now their magic was vain, for he lay dead and the splinter of the foreign brand yet stood in his skull till Iseult plucked it out and shut it in a chest. From that day Iseult the Fair knew and hated the name of Tristan of Lyonesse. But over in Tintagel Tristan languished, for there trickled a poisonous blood from his wound. The doctors found that the Morholt had thrust into him a poisoned barb, and as their potions and their theriac could never heal him they left him in God’s hands. So hateful a stench came from his wound that all his dearest friends fled him, all save King Mark, Gorvenal and Dinas of Lidan. They always could stay near his couch because their love overcame their abhorrence. At last Tristan had himself carried into a boat apart on the shore; and lying facing the sea he awaited death, for he thought: “I must die; but it is good to see the sun and my heart is still high. I would like to try the sea that brings all chances. … I would have the sea bear me far off alone, to what land no matter, so that it heal me of my wound.” He begged so long that King Mark accepted his desire. He bore him into a boat with neither sail nor oar, and Tristan wished that his harp only should be placed beside him: for sails he could not lift, nor oar ply, nor sword wield; and as a seaman on some long voyage casts to the sea a beloved companion dead, so Gorvenal pushed out to sea that boat where his dear son lay; and the sea drew him away. For seven days and seven nights the sea so drew him; at times to charm his grief, he harped; and when at last the sea brought him near a shore where fishermen had left their port that night to fish far out, they heard as they rowed a sweet and strong and living tune that ran above the sea, and feathering their oars they listened immovable. In the first whiteness of the dawn they saw the boat at large: she went at random and nothing seemed to live in her except the voice of the harp. But as they neared, the air grew weaker and died; and when they hailed her Tristan’s hands had fallen lifeless on the strings though they still trembled. The fishermen took him in and bore him back to port, to their lady who was merciful and perhaps would heal him. It was that same port of Whitehaven where the Morholt lay, and their lady was Iseult the Fair. She alone, being skilled in philtres, could save Tristan, but she alone wished him dead. When Tristan knew himself again (for her art restored him) he knew himself to be in the land of peril. But he was yet strong to hold his own and found good crafty words. He told a tale of how he was a seer that had taken passage on a merchant ship and sailed to Spain to learn the art of reading all the stars,—of how pirates had boarded the ship and of how, though wounded, he had fled into that boat. He was believed, nor did any of the Morholt’s men know his face again, so hardly had the poison used it. But when, after forty days, Iseult of the Golden Hair had all but healed him, when already his limbs had recovered and the grace of youth returned, he knew that he must escape, and he fled and after many dangers he came again before Mark the King. THE QUEST OF THE LADY WITH THE HAIR OF GOLD My lords, there were in the court of King Mark four barons the basest of men, who hated Tristan with a hard hate, for his greatness and for the tender love the King bore him. And well I know their names: Andret, Guenelon, Gondoïne and Denoalen. They knew that the King had intent to grow old childless and to leave his land to Tristan; and their envy swelled and by lies they angered the chief men of Cornwall against Tristan. They said: “There have been too many marvels in this man’s life. It was marvel enough that he beat the Morholt, but by what sorcery did he try the sea alone at the point of death, or which of us, my lords, could voyage without mast or sail? They say that warlocks can. It was sure a warlock feat, and that is a warlock harp of his pours poison daily into the King’s heart. See how he has bent that heart by power and chain of sorcery! He will be king yet, my lords, and you will hold your lands of a wizard.” They brought over the greater part of the barons and these pressed King Mark to take to wife some king’s daughter who should give him an heir, or else they threatened to return each man into his keep and wage him war.

      Now they are sort of forcing him to have a child so they are not kingless.

    1. The name “One” means that God is uniquely all things through the transcendence of one unity and that he is the Cause of all without ever departing from that oneness. Nothing in the world lacks its share of the One. Just as every number participates in unity — for we refer to one couple, one dozen, one-half, one-third, one-tenth-so everything, and every part of everything, participates in the One. By being the One, it is all things. The One cause of all things is not one of the many things in the world but actually precedes oneness and multiplicity and indeed defines oneness and multiplicity. For multiplicity cannot exist without some participation in the One. That which is many in its parts is one in its entirety. T

      This is very clever-- if you think of it physically, it may get confusing, but conceptually it checks out with me

    1. You may, however, notice that the Spearman similarities for individual years on this graph are about .1 lower than they were when we graphed fiction as a 39-year moving window. In principle Spearman similarity is independent of corpus size, but it can be affected by the diversity of a corpus. The similarity between two individual texts is generally going to be lower than the similarity between two large and diverse corpora. So could the changes we’ve seen be produced by changes in corpus size? There could be some effect, but I don’t think it’s large enough to explain the phenomenon. [See update at the bottom of this post. The results are in fact even clearer when you keep corpus size constant. -Ed.] The sizes of the corpora for different genres don’t change in a way that would produce the observed decreases in similarity; the fiction corpus, in particular, gets larger as it gets less like nonfiction. Meanwhile, it is at the same time becoming more like poetry. We’re dealing with some factor beyond corpus size.

      this is an important paragraph in the piece. And you can find more about Spearman (an important concept and method in the piece) in wikipedia and in this interesting commercial-curricular web site (Laerd): https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/spearmans-rank-order-correlation-statistical-guide.php

    1. As we enter the 21st century, the barriers are crumbling.

      As they should! What good are these barriers anyway? I think it could lead us to great results through the combination of different minds. It may also open us up to more questions, but that is not a bad thing.

    1. “I think of suicide as a health issue but also as a societal issue. There’s something going on to where people are not feeling hopeful in increasing numbers and don’t see opportunity or goodness out there," Meyers said. "And we really need to change that as a community and in our health care systems. We want to empower them to say, ‘Yeah, I can think about this, and I don’t have to act on it, and here are the ways I’m going to counter those thoughts or change what’s happening.'”

      Kim sees how big of an issue this is. She knows the problem lies much deeper than we may have previously believed.

    1. His fortune may, perhaps, afford him the means of acquiring both, but the mere possession of that fortune does not necessarily convey to him either.

      I agree with this statement. I think wealth and power get compared too much. Especially presently, power doesn't mean wealth at all in the United States. Large quantities of people that produce momentum equal power. This is evident in movements such as me too. My generation has the least amount of money of all the adult generations, yet recently we are gaining control because of our voices. However, I do understand that in history and in other countries money usually leads to power.

    1. one-on-one interviews

      I think it would be interesting if we interview people from admissions outside of class to get a more personal relationship with them and we can bounce an idea that we may have off of them as an outside perspective.

  12. Jan 2019
    1. a collaborative endeavor

      We tend to think about artists as solo-creators, working away in studios all by themselves, often long into the night. This exhibition reveals an utterly different dimension of artistic production in the Victorian period--as the authors here say, "the collaborative endeavor" that was "Nineteenth-century book production." When looking at the images that accompany this exhibition, I am struck indeed by the multi-sensory experiences these images offer to us. I am struck, for example, by the way that the lady in The Lady of Shalott is both turned partly away from us, but also seems to invite us in to her web, beckoning us to an entwining that may, in the end be ill-advised. Is she going to trap us? Will we mind? Perhaps as with the other paintings and drawings we see in this exhibition, the experience will have the lushness of a pleasurable physical or intellectual encounter. We may be ensnared, but we will be so willingly. It makes me wonder what the Victorians might also have to say about consent.

    1. If we’re doomed to toil away until we die, we may as well pretend to like it. Even on Mondays.

      I think there is a fine balance in the end. Millennials love going to the extremes simply because of the dramatic trends that are going around social media. One can still be successful without waking up loving every single Monday morning. Sure, people should love what they do, but they also have to realize that there will be moments that are difficult and not enjoyable.

    1. Comprehensive knowledge of the reference wouldrequireustobeabletosayimmediatelywhetheranygivensensebelongsto it. To such knowledge we never attain.

      We may want to be able to combine sense and reference, so that from a sense we would be able to get all things that belong to it, i.e., its reference. Here, Frege is saying that this is impossible and, further, cannot be possible.

      I wonder how true this is. While I can certainly see it in natural language, what about something as rigorous as the discourse in Math? I think most people would agree that the reference of "all those x such that x * 2 = 4" is certainly known--the only element is 2.

    1. And the essence of that history is, basically, we don't want to, as a country -- well, the vast majority of States, to fund houses of worship.

      Based on this section, and her points thereafter, I think Justice Sotomayor may be one of the dissenters. She does her due diligence to flesh out the background of the counterargument while not explicitly counterarguing, but the thrust seems to go against Mr. Cortman's premise.

    1. Faster material and lenses, more automatic cameras, finer-grained sensitive compounds to allow an extension of the minicamera idea, are all imminent

      With a product like the Smartphone now available to us, having an easily accessible and well working camera is common among people in our society. We can capture any moment we wish to with a phone in hand.

    2. advanced photography which can record what is seen or even what is not

      I am automatically reminded of our technologies advancing towards (and some which already exist) allowing us to see what is not visible with the naked eye in outer space.

    3. A spider web of metal, sealed in a thin glass container, a wire heated to brilliant glow, in short, the thermionic tube of radio sets, is made by the hundred million, tossed about in packages, plugged into sockets—and it works!

      The comparison of technology shows both the strength and delicacy of it. Spider webs are incredibly strong when withstanding brute force, but can be easily broken if you poke a stick through it. Technology AND spiderwebs are underestimated tools.

    4. For the biologists, and particularly for the medical scientists, there can be little indecision, for their war has hardly required them to leave the old paths. Many indeed have been able to carry on their war research in their familiar peacetime laboratories. Their objectives remain much the same.

      Here you can see the way that biologists have a finite amount of things to discover, whereas physicists, who you would often not connect to technology, have more infinite possibilities of exploration in their field, which is something we still see today.

    5. Today, with microfilm, reductions by a linear factor of 20 can be employed and still produce full clarity when the material is re-enlarged for examination

      dgst101

    6. “Consider a future device …  in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.”

      He is talking about a computer/IPad/Smartphone without knowing that's what he's thinking about. It's likely that he never thought they would be so small or sleek.

    7. his publication did not reach the few who were capable of grasping and extending it

      Why were only a few capable of grasping it? Should we not be educating our citizens and our children so that "the few" becomes "the many"? Or at least teaching people to write in an understandable fashion so that "truly significant attainments" don't "become lost".

    8. First, they have increased his control of his material environment. They have improved his food, his clothing, his shelter; they have increased his security and released him partly from the bondage of bare existence.

      If by "man" you mean "rich people".

    9. They have done their part on the devices that made it possible to turn back the enemy

      "The enemy" is subjective and often decided merely by the victors... It's important to remember that "turn[ing] back the enemy" just means killing people.

    10. The perfection of these pacific instruments should be the first objective of our scientists as they emerge from their war work

      I think scientists should pay close attention to what exactly these instruments would be used for. I'm not sure that just inventing them without considering the fallout is a great idea.

    11. For years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the powers of his mind

      This is interesting, I guess it's the fact that we first made inventions that extend our physical powers that then allowed us to create inventions for our minds.

    1. . In short, money doesn’t mean; it mov

      This makes me think of today's discussion about childhood language development--words as signals rather than symbols. Here, we might consider money as a form of rhetoric. It may be more productive to examine what it does/what it attempts to do/what it connects/what it transforms, rather than what it simply is.