38 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2021
    1. ​La forme de cet écrit est multisupport : à l’écran et imprimée, mettant en action les outils développés par les designers que j’étudie dans cette réflexion. Et, le propos sur l’édition à plusieurs est actionné par les commentaires de chaque lecteur disponibles sur la version numérique.

      Les commentaires et échanges ne sont donc visibles que sur la version numérique ? Puisqu'on parle de web to print, ce serait intéressant que l'écrit augmenté soit aussi présent dans la forme imprimée. En terme de mise en page, cela pourrait donner lieu à une forme intéressante des échanges : en fin d'ouvrage ? ou entrecoupant les différents chapitres ? ou encore directement en face de l'écrit d'origine pour confronter deux textes ? Chaque nouvelle impression serait comme une réédition, une édition qui s'écrirait sans cesse dans le temps.

  2. May 2021
    1. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.07.20093963.

      Rosado J, Pelleau S, Cockram C et al. Multiplex assays for the identification of serological signatures of SARS-CoV-2 infection: an antibody-based diagnostic and machine learning study. The Lancet Microbe 2021; doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30197-X.

    2. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.05.135921.

      Bertoglio F, Meier D, Langreder N et al. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing human recombinant antibodies selected from –pre-pandemic healthy donors binding at RBD-ACE2 interface. Nature Communications 2021; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21609-2.

    3. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.17.20140533.

      Sahin U, Muik A, Derhovnessian E et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell repsonses. Nature 2020; doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2814-7.

    4. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.29.178509.

      Tian J-H, Patel N, Haupt R et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein vaccine candidate NVX-CoV2373 immunogenicity in baboons and protection in mice. Nature Communications 2021; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20653-8.

    5. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.27.175166.

      Routhu NK, Cheedarla N, Gangadhara S et al. A modified vaccinia Ankara vector-based vaccine protects macaques from SARS-CoV-2 infection, immune pathology, and dysfunction in the lungs. Immunity 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.02.001.

    6. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.09.242867.

      Gai J, Ma L, Li G et al. A potent neutralizing nanobody against SARS-CoV-2 with inhaled delivery potential. MedComm 2021; doi: 10.1002/mco2.60.

    7. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.22.20137695.

      Hicks J, Klumpp-Thomas C, Kalish H et al. Serologic Cross-Reactivity of SARS-CoV-2 with Endemic and Seasonal Betacoronaviruses. Journal of Clinical Immunology. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-021-00997-6

    8. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.29.20162917

      Klassan SA, Senefeld, JW, Johnson PW et al. The Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on COVID-19 Patient Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. medRxiv 2021; doi: 10.1101/2020.07.29.20162917.

    9. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.28.20083139

      Xiao T, Wang Y, Yuan J et al. Early Viral Clearance and Antibody Kinetics of COVID-19 Among Asymptomatic Carriers. Frontiers in Medicine. 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.595773

    10. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.21.261909.

      Gontu A, Srinivasan S, Salazar E et al. Limited window for donation of convalescent plasma with high live-virus neutralizing antibodies for COVID-19 immunotherapy. Communications Biology 2021; doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01813-y.

    11. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.18.20155374.

      Iyer AS, Jones FK, Nodoushania A et al. Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients. Sci Immunol 2020; doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abe0367.

  3. Mar 2021
    1. Patricio R Estevez-Soto. (2020, November 24). I’m really surprised to see a lot of academics sharing their working papers/pre-prints from cloud drives (i.e. @Dropbox @googledrive) 🚨Don’t!🚨 Use @socarxiv @SSRN @ZENODO_ORG, @OSFramework, @arxiv (+ other) instead. They offer persisent DOIs and are indexed by Google scholar [Tweet]. @prestevez. https://twitter.com/prestevez/status/1331029547811213316

  4. Feb 2021
  5. Oct 2020
    1. and serve as pre-prints to work that may live later on, or always exist in their current format

      Thinking of a personal site as a pre-print server is an interesting concept and somewhat similar to the idea of a commonplace book.

  6. Aug 2020
  7. May 2020
  8. Apr 2020
  9. Nov 2019
  10. Jul 2019
  11. Feb 2019
    1. World-class print and packaging solutions for enhancing the efficiency of all printing processes from A.T.E., a leading print and packaging equipment system manufacturer in India. We manufacture various equipment like register control system, web video system which is useful in the print and packaging industry.

  12. Jan 2019
    1. Africans in the Atlantic world, printed discourse was part of a larger "racial complex" that both supported imperial plantation systems and denied people of color equality in the civic realm. This racial complex was constituted in a variety of printed forms, from slave laws stored in dusty bookshelves to denigrating racial labels in popular plays, novels, and pieces of travel writing. By the latter half of the eighteenth century, however, a vanguard of black writers, readers, and letter writers came to view printed discourse as a potential means of surmounting racial oppres sion. According to the literary scholar John Ernest, letters, literacy, print, and the book all became part of a "liberation historiography"—a "specifically textual" response by black writers to racial hierarchies established not only in law and politics but in print.

      This section truly highlights the contradictory nature of the print medium as an information technology that was used by imperial whites to marginalize black voices and on the other hand was used to by black writers to tackle, overcome racial oppression and reclaim the black voice.

  13. Jun 2018
  14. May 2018
  15. Apr 2017
  16. www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org
    1. Digital logics can be a bit more pushy than print logics. So much for the supposed freedom of electronic literature

      I think you're right to hedge this point with "can be." I'd argue that "electronic literature" can take a bazillion different forms, some more "pushy," some less "pushy" than ink-on-paper print texts (with regard to their ordering "logics"). I'd therefore urge reformulating your point more along these lines: "The ordering logics of some digital genres [or: ... of some currently popular digital genres?] are in some ways more pushy and prescriptive than the ordering logics of many traditional paper-print genres."

  17. Mar 2017
    1. If Kriegeskorte is invited by a journal to write a review, first he decides whether he’s interested enough to review it. If so, he checks whether there’s a preprint available—basically a final draft of the manuscript posted publicly online on one of several preprint servers like arxiv and biorxiv. This is crucial. Writing about a manuscript that he’s received in confidence from a journal editor would break confidentiality—talking about a paper before the authors are ready. If there’s a preprint, great. He reviews the paper, posts to his blog, and also sends the review to the journal editor.

      Interesting workflow and within his rights.

  18. May 2016
    1. The case for print

      Not either/or for sure. Continuing to equate OER with traditional textbooks vastly constrains the power of OER and open education. How about helping students develop the skills and use the tools to work with digital media in much more powerful ways than is possible with paper?

  19. Nov 2015
    1. A similar project that explores the potential and limits of POD is AND's Variable Format: 'a sample book, a model, a serial system that explores the technological margins of print on demand and how reading is informed by the materiality of the book object'.

      This project has been conceived by Lynn Harris, published by AND and designed by Åbäke with Pierre Pautler:

      http://www.andpublishing.org/variable-format/and-variable-format/

  20. Jul 2015
    1. Sec. 15-7. - Injuring or defacing library property. Whoever willfully injures or defaces any book, newspaper, magazine, pamphlet, manuscript, or other property belonging to the city library by writing, marking, tearing, breaking, or otherwise mutilating shall be fined as provided in section 1-8. (Code 1964, amended, § 19.19(A)) Cross reference— Damage to public property, § 17-26. State Law reference— Criminal mischief, V.A.P.C. § 28.03; reckless damage of property, § 28.04.
  21. Jun 2015
    1. "Was wir sehen können, ist, dass 1,4 Milliarden Menschen eine Plattform zu einem mehr oder weniger zentralen Teil ihres Lebens gemacht haben, die von einem Menschen an der Spitze gesteuert wird", nämlich Mark Zuckerberg. "Niemand ist uns bisher so nahe an uns herangekommen."