1. Last 7 days
    1. ABSTRACT

      Oh okk so, yes the author is promoting multinat fed as one of the best forms to uphold dem because it has the ability for the minority nations to be heard. but a level of self-restraint must be seen by majority nation so there isn't any state stability with the minority nation fighting back for more autonomy. (additionally, their level of autonomy is not a 1 conversation deal its a day-tp-day.) the author uses the federalism formula and applied to complex pol systems to demostrate that if the majority nation cannot uphold deep div then minority nations will get angry and put in a situation of dominance.

    2. .

      Multinat fed are not a panacea but its best for fulfilling dem principles and give voice to minority nations/large # of pol comm. "complementary to this", multinat fed can give added val to principle of self-gov in dem settings through implantation of innovative pol practices in maintaining multinat unity.

    3. .

      Mutlinat fed allow for the minority nation to institutionalise a pol of recognition and minority nations are able to develop policy instruments to put limits on dom of majority nation. Therefore the extent that minority nations are treated fairly can expect state stability will be increased and constitutional loyalty will stay intact (because the minority nation won't want to escape). All of this means the majority nation must excerise a level of self-restraint

    4. .

      OH! resistnace to deep diversity is ever where and well documented but what makes multinat fed "better" is its ability to consider the voice of the minority nations because they are built into the pol fabric of the country.

    5. .

      The author reiterates the imoprtance of finding an equilibrium between self-rule and shared rule in order to achieve respect to lang protections, hiring practices, and provision of fair rep in Legilative Assembly and Upper House for the minority nations.

    6. .

      There are many cases where the regional state regained their autonomy (East Timor, Eritrea, Kosovo, Montenegro, and South Suden) and they have become independent. (*which it is a point for multinat fed are doomed to collapse...)

    7. .

      Shout out to Philip Resnick, might hav eto check him out on his views. The author highlights that the central challenge is within finding a proper equilibrium between sefl-rule and shared rule. The Canadian fed is complex and Quebec desires to have share of pol competencies. Though there are some minority nations that are fine with the central state taking care of certain businesses because the minority nation doesn't have the resources to self-rule. But this may lead to situations where the majority nation takes more and more control away from minority

    8. .

      This is a lot of what the author is arguing but it is framed in this essay through the backing up of Pierre Trudeau's point about multinat fed (which is the advantages of staying integrated for the minority nation must outweigh the down-sides/other opportunities that may occur when spilting. Author added on that this success is dependent on how much the central state is willing to accomodate deep diversity. Lists examples of how the central state can accomodate. mainly pol power sharing, pol auto, adoption of collab

    9. .

      Integration of these 2 things won't guarantee that the nultinat will survive because the terms must be negotiated ona day-to-day basis. However the 2 things do contribute to strengthening relations of trust between pol partners.

    10. .

      Author highlights other authors support for their argument because the 2 things are incentives for ethnic territorial interests to mobilise and organise their opposition aginst central state. the author uses USSR Yugo and Czechslovakia's collapses as examples.

    11. .

      national pluralism really matters and must be protected institutionally. 1st stress importance of asymmetrical arrangements. 2nd more decentralised pol regime. The author argues the incorporation of these 2 will favour pol stability.

    12. .

      depoliticise both ethnic and cul rights in multinat/ethnic settings. the author is highlighting the urgency of advancing pol rights of comm in territorially-delineated space so liberalism can take diff and more performative exp to prompt state actors to go beyond indiv pol autonomy.

    13. .

      it is important to distinguish concept of nation/s as demos/demoi from state as pol institution. this connects to the authors argument that there is a need to decouple the concepts of nation and state when observing the way state nationalists act in div pol settings.

    14. .

      The author suggests the addition of a 4th process which consists of forcing fed members to adhere to same norms, standards, and objectives as ones determined by central state in the name of efficiency, performance, nad rationality

    15. .

      The 3rd process of renationalisation regards anti-immigration policy implementations aimed to "protect the national cultures of Euro countries against population flows of global migration". France, Germany, and UK are challenging the principle of deep div by arguing that multicul is detrimental to maintenance of pol and soc cohesion.

    16. .

      There are observed efforts from the minority nations to "get a better deal" with existing pol settings (ex: Meech Lake prop with Quebec and Canada & suspension of pol institutions in Catalonia through application of Article 155). These are situtations where the central state are using the carrot (Canada) or the stick (Spain) to tame/silence opposition.

    17. .

      2nd process of renationalisation has to do with national responses to national building strategies. They assert they ought to have equal status with majority nation and claim to have right both to internal and external self-determination. Mentions Quebec's pol force mobilising behind "equality or independence". Similar scenarios have emerged in Catalonia, Basque country, Scotland, Flanders, and beyond.

    18. .

      The 1st is about the recurrence of violent conflicts in Cen and East Euro following collapse of USSR in 1993. Discusses two fallen multinat fed (Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia) because they were affected by the pol tensions from the collapse. Their dismantlement led experts to say multinat fed could only lead to or feed pol instability. Or the author reframes as the experts are saying multinat fed contained the seeds of their own failure in their ethno-nationalist comp.

    19. .

      There are countries (Belgium, Canada, Finland, Germany, Switzerland, and UK) that have been willing to provide support to minority nations through dynamic push and pull that was benefitted by new sensitivity to cul pluralism, nat div, and linguistic div. However, in countries like Spain it wasn't going to last the whole time due to impending dom pol forces trying to reverse it back to central state hegemony and they themselves upholf state stability.

    20. .Footnote

      Trend of renationalisation (powerful forces bringing together the central state back) in the past 3 decades. This leads to weaker groups from holding onto their own power which lead to distrust and mistrust among leaders and neg impact between pol comms.

    21. .

      *I'm a little confused about this paragraph but here's my go. The author is engaging with the discussion about how most forms of multinat fed is linked to ethnofed whic is linked to be unstable "as narrow ethnic identities would prevail over broad civic achievement" or to the unraveling of various communist feds. The author's aim is to take rep of pol interests and their dem exp seriously instead of assuming like Bunce and her colleagues that all pol actions are motivated by ethnic aspirations/goals.

    22. .

      This is the author's definition of multinat fed, one about recognising presence of multiple identities and sustaining appropriate institutions capable of empowering pol comm to promote state differentiation and state collab.

    23. .

      Author highlights existing definitions of mulitnat fed. 1st and dominant current focuses on notion of territorial or mon-nat fed. 2nd thats gaining more prominence current focuses on pol presence of more than one sociological nat & sig for pursuit of pol legitimacy and maintenance of pol stability

    24. .

      Authors thesis + roadmap are here. Thesis = present multinat fed as a new distinctive form of pol association to favour nat div within complex dem settings. Roadmap = what multinat fed offers alt to dom lit on territorial/mononat fed, ongoing nat building processes and how multinat fed can aid, discusses reasons to adopt multinat fed in nat diverse contexts.

    25. .

      another counter arugment which involves students saying that multinat fed need a Staatsvolk to impose pol will to assert more dominance to be stable. Author fights this claim by arguing that we have seen the consequences of this through Spain (jailing pol leaders) and India when they removed the statute of pol autonomy from the Kashmir.

    26. Staatsvolk

      all nat subjects of a sovereign country. or those subjects belonging to the dominant ethnic group of a country, excluding minorities, especially those who belong to nations that have states of their own

    27. .

      The author brings in counter arguments from Christian Joppke (who argues that states are more inclined to secure and fortify majority culture and impose their authority, through adopting measurements) and Brian Barry (who argues that cultural diversity -> state fragmentation that turn into exploitation from ethnocultural pol entrepreneurs). Author concludes they are insensitive to minority claims

    28. .

      The author highlighted the period of advancement of deep diversity from late 1980s - mid 2000s. Within this period sprouted the ideas that diversity is really important to creativity that sustain public life. But after this period liberal Western dems witnessed backlash against this trend.

    29. .

      Mentions Myanmar, India, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Iraq. Author shares these cases as a way to demonstrate where the n. gative protrayals of multinational federations are coming from + the root of the issue (the imposition of common nationality).

    1. The urban setting, saturated with the vacant images of late capitalism leavesHamlet in an Un-Shakespearean universe.

      Throughout the movie, the sounds of traffic flowing through the city remind the viewer of the busy urban setting, painting the backdrop of many scenes. This particular aspect of modernity strongly contrasts with the Shakespearean language used by the characters.

    1. DA

      This section depicts an image of drought in India, drawing on the geography of the Ganges River (Ganga) and the Himalayan mountains (Himavant). The "limp leaves" and "sunken" river depict a world parched and waiting for a life-giving force, while the rain clouds gather "far distant," suggesting that salvation or meaning is possible but not yet present. The "jungle crouched, humped in silence" (line 399) adds a sense of primal, coiled tension, as if the entire natural world is holding its breath. This silence is then broken by the thunder, which says "DA." This sound as a three-part command structures the rest of this section; each command is met with a complex response, revealing a deep spiritual inadequacy. The first is "Datta," or "give". The speaker creates a self-interrogation by saying "what have we given?" (line 402) They later claim that "By this, and this only, we have existed." This "truth" is unrecordable though, and won't be found in "memories draped by the beneficent spider / Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor" (line 408). It exists only in the haunting echo of "our empty rooms." The thunder speaks again, saying "Dayadhvam," or "be compassionate." This triggers a scene from Dante's Inferno: "I have heard the key / Turn in the door once and turn once only" (line 412-413). This is the sound of Count Ugolino being locked in the tower to starve, a symbol of irrevocable imprisonment. Eliot then layers this with a philosophical idea from F.H. Bradley, who saw every individual consciousness as a isolated prison. Individuals are all trapped in their subjective selves, "each in his prison" (line 414) and their awareness of the isolation. Lastly the thunder commands Damyata. Unlike the previous two sections, which dwell on failure and isolation, this one offers a glimpse of harmony. It paints a picture of perfect control: a boat responding "gaily" to an "expert" hand. The speaker then poignantly extends this metaphor to a human relationship, saying "your heart would have responded / Gaily, when invited." The conditional tense "would have" is key—it reveals this harmonious control not as a reality, but as a lost opportunity or a poignant "what if." It’s a vision of a relationship that could have been obedient to "controlling hands," a symbiosis that was never achieved.

    2. Turn in the door once and turn once only

      Response to Sophie Perkel

      Reading the Brihadaranyaka source that connects to this section of the poem, I notice in Chapter five that the descriptions of "truth" and "falsehood" remind me of the third/fourth person from our previous readings. "The gods worship truth (satya), pronounced with three syllables, "sa-ti-yam". Sa and yam represent Truth, ti represents falsehood. "falsehood is surrounded on both sides by truth, and becomes truth." Falsehood being in-between is similar to how the "third person" is in-between, and if falsehood becomes truth by being surrounded by truth, then could the entity that is the third person, what does the "third person" become?

      Sophie has an intriguing point here about the "third (or fourth) person." Following her analysis of the three syllables "sa-ti-yam" of satya (truth), where "ti" means falsehood while the other two represent truth, then it would be logical to surmise that Eliot believes a third entity can become truthful if surrounded by truth. I don't necessarily believe that Eliot thinks falsehood can become true, but maybe that falsehood can become normalized and authentic to an individual. For example, if we build on my past annotation where I argued that there are three entities - God, an individual, and a third entity which tempts or distracts the individual from a clear path to Heaven or spirituality. In this case, the true entities that "count" (by the words of "the Thunder" earlier in this section) in life are God and the individual. Thus, that third entity which cannot be defined as it would be different for each entity is the falsehood because it should not be the core of living. Once we understand that, we can apply Sophie's theory and conclude that Eliot believes that although a distraction will never truly live up to the importance of an individual or the deity which they follow, enough prioritization of a sin will make it a habit and a necessity. In this way, that third entity of sin and temptation can become an authentic aspect of someone's life, because they have placed a falsehood on such a pedestal that it has become (to them) as truthful as God.

    3. Who is the third who walks always beside you? 360 When I count, there are only you and I together But when I look ahead up the white road There is always another one walking beside you

      In this section, there is no water, indicating a drought of spirituality in modern society. This makes sense, consider that “What the Thunder Said” likely refers to the words of God (or gods?) lamenting what the world he created has become. Although many might refer to “the third who walks always beside you” as Jesus or the Devil, I interpreted it as whatever temptation or distraction pulls people away from “holy” values. If we read the entire section as words said by “the Thunder” or God, then it would be logical to assume that this stanza portrays God questioning society on their downfall. This deity believes that all that counts/matters is “you and I together,” but even when looking at people who claim to be religious and on a path to heaven (the white road), they still live with other sins that they are not willing to give up. Hesse/Dostoevsky wrestles the possibility, or lack thereof, of evil in a world with God, and the guilt one feels (or does not feel) after being an accomplice or partaker in sin. This is increasingly apparent with the rise of overconsumption and personal liberty in the 20th century, so it is no surprise that Eliot, in his analysis of modern society’s problems, views the material and relational temptations (described many times throughout the poem) as barriers to true spirituality.

    4. DA

      I have been tracking agency across the poem in many of my annotations. Something that I think somehow fits with this—also at play across the poem—is perception. Someone touched on this the other day (I think it might have been William, but I can’t quite remember), and it made me think of this connection.

      “Da” means “be self-controlled,” “give,” or “be compassionate.” But how can these three be distinguished between when just “Da” is used (and not Damyata or Datta or Dayadhvam, and if the relationship—to gods, to human beings, or to demons—is not defined)? How does the second voice in the exchange in the poem discern which? Zooming out, readers, in a pause before reading what follows after each “Da,” can interpret it as all three at once, or choose one. Is this desired? How does the effect change?

      The Bradley source clearly speaks very much to perception. How can the exchange between the two figures (one being thunder) here at the end with the three repetitions, and meanings, of “Da” be informed or elucidated by this? At the very least, it seems to exemplify the potential disconnect (and differing interpretation etc.) Bradley lays out. Is this then to spread to other characters and their exchanges in the poem? All of this makes me want to loop back to Madame Sosotris, and the tarot deck…

      On a slightly different note, I think this ending (or at least the beginning of the end; I don’t want to speak too soon) is hopeful. The order of “Da”s goes from human beings to demons to gods, ending with self-control—and a boat responding “Gaily, to the hand expert with sail and oar / the sea was calm…” This seems to lay out the journey, ending on top, and with established human agency. But of course I am now seeing some other ways this could be read…

    5. He who was living is now dead We who were living are now dying

      Response to Marisin McLain (and Sophie Perkel)

      Last year, scholar Sophie Perkel noted how the ambiguous “he”, who plagues this poem makes its final appearance in this line, “He who was living is now dead.” There is a finality of death, different from the amorphous cycle of life and rebirth that has plagued the poem thus far, as this “he” dies not only because Eliot wrote it so, but because “he” never appears again; the pronoun dies from the remaining stanzas. This finality is also emphasized by the following line, which follows a similar grammatical pattern, but differs in number of the subject (singular versus plural) and form of the final word (dead vs. dying). The two lines follow this grammatical structure: First person singular/plural - imperfect verb in relative clause - present verb - adjective/present participle. The imperfect verb is the most recent form of past tense, indicating a freshness to the living, and the present provides vividness for the current state of death. But death and dying have far more contrast: death is an adjective, used to directly describe and define “he”. There is no verby-ness in its form, instead more analogous to the noun death. Conversely, “we” are “dying”, a present participle, a verbal adjective meaning continuous action. In this moment of time we are still going through the process of dying, it is not yet complete. With this continuous form the first person pronoun continues to appear in alive use throughout the remainder. “We” might be dying, but we are not yet dead.

      I found it very interesting how Sophie and Marisin noted that “He who was living is now dead” is the final appearance of the pronoun “He” in the poem. Now that “He” is dead, the pronoun’s presence has also died, or ceased to exist, in the poem. This makes the later points in the poem feel more personal, now that Eliot has removed the ambiguous “he.” I would like to build off of Marisin’s point that “we” are still going through the process of dying, but it is not yet complete so the pronoun “we” is not eliminated. Technically, one might argue that, from birth, we are always dying, since each moment of aging is a step towards death. This makes me wonder, is “he” always dead or just for the remainder of this poem? What is Eliot’s perspective on the cycle of life – is there rebirth like I originally thought from his frequency imagery or water, or is there one finite life like the previous Buddha source argued? Eliot’s small but intentional grammatical choices give insight into his wider arguments, one’s that cannot be missed.

    6. DA

      “Look at this stuff, isn’t it neat?” she asks, surrounded by objects that don’t speak her language. Ariel’s voice is stolen so she can walk on land, and that is the question of Psalm 137: “How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?” Eliot asks the same thing, except there’s no sea witch to blame, only silence. The Ganga is sunken, the clouds are distant, and the thunder can barely form a word: DA. The syllable stammers toward meaning. Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata. Give. Sympathize. Control. Commands that echo the psalm’s plea for song but return only fragments. The captives in Babylon hung their harps on the willows; Eliot’s speakers hang their words on static. The thunder speaks, but its language is splintered, a sacred tongue reduced to consonants. Both rivers are holy, both are broken. The Ganges without rain is as desolate as Babylon without Zion. In both, sound becomes the only remaining form of faith, the echo of what once was music. The psalmist threatens vengeance, but Eliot offers obedience; both are desperate to reclaim voice through rhythm. When the thunder says DA, it is the ghost of a hymn, a cracked psalm vibrating through dry air. The rain hesitates at the edge of speech. What’s left is a choir of lost voices, each trying to sing in a language it no longer believes in. Ariel traded her song for legs; Eliot traded his for survival. Neither ever gets it back.

    7. Who is the third who walks always beside you? 360 When I count, there are only you and I together But when I look ahead up the white road There is always another one walking beside you

      “It’s a glitch in the Matrix.” That is what this moment feels like, the instant the world repeats itself and perception breaks. The voice counts two but sees three. The brown-mantled figure glides beside them, half real, half reflection. The road is bright enough to blind. This is not revelation but error, a tear in vision. The “third” is not a companion or a god. It is the self split open, awareness doubled until it can no longer tell which part is moving forward. The desert becomes circuitry, the white road a frozen current. The “hooded hordes” that follow are copied bodies, corrupted code replaying itself. Every pilgrim in the poem—Roland, Dracula, Eliot’s wanderer—exists in this duplication. The chapel, the tower, the city: all illusions rendered again and again. The thunder speaks in fragments because speech itself has been divided. Even rain feels artificial, a false reset. The “third” is what remains after too much seeing, the echo of thought that keeps walking when the body stops. It is both the error and the evidence, the ghost produced by perception’s glitch.

    8. Elizabeth and Leicester

      Response to Anthony Hu's Annotation from 2024

      "...Both sexes have been unanimously subjected to the similar degenerative consequences of contemporary industrialization and mechanization of love. Here, however, I want to highlight a disparity between the presentation of the two sexes. Why does Eliot include here the hidden affair between Queen Elizabeth I and Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester? ... Recall that a consistent motif throughout the poem is the identification of characters with the Fisher King, who, due to a physical impotence, leads to sterility throughout his country’s land. Queen Elizabeth, however, serves as a complete antithesis in “The Fire Sermon.” Publicly known as the “Virgin Queen,” her physical chastity is often celebrated along with the glamor of the country during her rule. In fact, we can easily identify causal relationships between the two – for instance, it is precisely to ensure Britain’s political stability that members of the nobility propagated rumors that prevented a marriage between the queen and the earl. Unlike for the Fisher King, whose sexual potency is restored through the renewal of the land, it seems like female virility is negatively related to the prosperity (and therefore metaphorical fertility) of the land. ...Despite all of that, perhaps there is no disparity after all. If we interpret the queen’s virginity not as a sterile state, but the potential for future fertility, she perfectly demonstrates the pattern embodied in the Fisher King. In a historical context, this interpretation indeed holds some truth – for other European powers at the time, Elizabeth’s chastity meant she was constantly available for a future arrangement of political marriage; as such, the stability and prosperity of the nation was maintained. To reach a final answer on this matter of gender portrayal, a comparison of patterns throughout the poem will be ideal.

      Anthony brought up a comparison which I did not consider between Queen Elizabeth I (or the Virgin Queen) and the Fisher King (the Maimed King). He recalls how the Fisher King’s sterilization due to injury causes his country to suffer in success and land fertility. Queen Elizabeth’s virginity is celebrated as having brought more success to England. She was revered for being “married to her country” – a selfless leader who prioritized the good of the nation over the possibility of building a family. Although Eliot chastises both men and women for the modern lack of sexual restraint, there is clearly still a difference in how the separate genders are portrayed. The Fisher King is called “the Maimed King,” so that his title and identity becomes fused with his infertile state. Queen Elizabeth is titled “the Virgin Queen,” almost equating her to the Virgin Mary, who is celebrated for having a child without sacrificing her “purity.” Maybe the point of contrast here is gender, that men should be allowed sexual freedom while women should not. The authority of male leaders is often measured by their virility. We see this with Queen Elizabeth’s father, Henry VIII, who may not have been praised for his many wives, but he was still obeyed and seen as a powerful leader. Female leaders, on the other hand, are expected to devote their entire lives to their career. Often, when a woman is pregnant with a child, the public is given an explicit reminder of her sex, and with that a level of subconscious bias that she is no longer physically or emotionally fit for this role. Since men were seen as the preferential leaders and men cannot carry children, a woman who does not carry a child is seen as closer to the ideal leader than one that does, explaining the praise of a virgin queen. Contrastingly, the difference between the two royals may be based on their ability and choice. The Fisher King is forced to be infertile against his will while Queen Elizabeth chooses to be celibate. Although this may be a large reason for the discrepancy, we cannot remove gender from the equation. One might say that infertility is not a choice while virginity is, and though that is true for the most part, Eliot references sexual assault throughout the poem as an unfortunate exception that rule. An infertile man could still succeed, albeit with challenges, because his value is not tied to a spouse, but a woman who has experienced sexual assault was labeled as “ruined,” despite having no choice in the matter. Finally, power and societal standing cannot be ignored. A single woman living in poverty would not be famed for her virginity to the level that Queen Elizabeth was. Similarly, an infertile man not in power would not be publicly shamed for his infertility if he stood his ground in other areas of life. So, there are both drawbacks and benefits to power which the Fisher King and Queen Elizabeth experience. In conclusion, while we can theorize Eliot’s stance on sexuality based on textual references, it is clear that power, gender, and consent have an unmistakable influence on the relationship between a person’s reputation and their romantic endeavors.

    9. I do not know whether a man or a woman

      Lucas, I really enjoyed reading your annotation, and I agree with your analysis. Throughout The Waste Land Eliot explores the fate of men and the fate of women, but there are several central points of almost overwhelming union(/fusion?) of the binary—the first being Tiresias, and the second being here, with this nebulous “third.” This figure, while amorphous, is key, pulling together a number of sources (Shakelton, Marudanayagam, Luke, Weston (the Black Hand?)) and clearly standing as some kind of higher power.

      The Visuddhi-Magga boils all beings down to the same—the absolute physical: bones and then working outwards. In so directly linking this to the mysterious third person, Eliot seems finally to have settled in his back and forth between defined gender roles and fates vs. none at all. And, as Lucas notes, bones run through the Waste Land, persisting beyond all outside layers. But how, then, to reconcile that other side still present? Perhaps the way Eliot doesn’t directly quote from the Visuddhi-Magga, and punctuates differently, and switches the order of “man” and “woman” shows that he isn’t in fact wholly drawing from the source.

      Something else interesting to note, in a broader / more general sense, is that three functions as a number of disruption—it unsettles the stability of two, breaking the pair or the binary or the dipole. And it is from two that a third can be formed—from both, as a mix. I have been inspired to think more about the significance of this number (which happens to be my lucky number :) ) by Dr. Blevins’ paper on numbers in TWL and Celina ’23’s note that “the number three plays an important role in ancient scholars’ perception of the world, and it is hard to explain this weird infatuation with this specific number across universal applications” (she cites Lao Zi and Daoism, to start). I also think there is perhaps a connection somewhere in here to Hesse’s idea of “the downfall of Europe” which is to result in a fusing of the European man and the Russian man—or perhaps just the European man becoming the Russian man, who in himself is already the third, a mix of good and bad, moral and immoral, etc.

    10. At the violet hour,

      The word “violet” appears four times in the Waste Land. The first and second are “At the violet hour,” the third is “in the violet air,” and the fourth is “in the violet light.” In this instance, we focus on “at the violet hour” being repeated twice within one stanza of “The Fire Sermon.” The violet hour describes sunset, that moment when the sky changes colors before it becomes completely dark. Although it can be easily surmised that “the violet hour” is sunset, that is not a particularly common term for it, which is why it is significant that Eliot used the phrase twice. The color violet, or purple, is a mixture between the colors red and blue. Red is often associated with fire, while blue is associated with water. Red, or pink, has been traditionally assigned to women, while blue has been associated with men. Finally, red is associated with Hell, while blue is associated with the blue skies of Heaven. These associations with the colors red and blue are relevant, because Eliot mixes them each with their supposed opposites at some point within the poem. So, the violet hour seems to represent the meshing of contradictory forces, which is a major theme in the Waste Land. Furthermore, the poem refers to the nightingale’s call, seen as the song of exploited women whose voices are only heard at night. So, if men are heard during the day and women at night, the “violet hour” is the only time in which both voices can be heard and appreciated. This is unique because, by the analysis of Eliot and the Roman Gods, only Tiresias can understand both sexes. So, it's no coincidence that Tiresias’ introduction to the text is at the violet hour. Tiresias, who spent seven years of his life mystically transformed into a woman, is blind with the ability to see the future. Lempriere writes that Tiresias drew his foresight “sometimes from the flight or the language of birds… and sometimes he drew the manes from the infernal regions.” The wisest character of the poem is one who has experienced both genders, is blind but has visions, and draws his knowledge from the sky and from hell. As a character so wise and explicit that he is afforded the power of temporary narrator, Tiresias’s importance to the essence of the poem is apparent. Even the structure of the poem agrees, with the first line of the Fire Sermon including “The river’s tent is broken” and the last line only being “burning.” Impressively, the line right in the middle of The Fire Sermon, perfectly in between the first and last lines describing opposites fire and water, is “And I Tiresias have foresuffered all” (243). The Waste Land may be a poem of oxymorons and contradictions from the withering spring to the warm winter, but, at the violet hour, Tiresias is the bridge that fuses them all together.

    11. Sweet Thames, run softly, till I end my song.

      Although Eliot, Carpenter, and Spenser all depict the River Thames as a significant reflection of society, they diverge in their characterization of the river and its role in modern sexuality. Carpenter, an early proponent of sexual and relational freedom, describes the Thames as a fluid beauty balancing nature and humanity.Eliot warns against sexual freedom, contradicting Carpenter and inverting Spenser. The line “Sweet Thames, run softly, till I end my song” comes directly from the refrain in Spenser’s “Prothalamion.” Spenser describes the River Thames as a beautiful sight, and an even more beautiful sight being the two swans of Jove and Leda. He describes the swans as so “purely white,” that even the water was impure to them, so much so that the river didn’t wet their feathers to spare them from self-pollution. Here, he paints an idealized image of a society that shines “as heaven’s light,” following religious values.

      “So purely white they were, That even the gentle stream, the which them bare, Seemed foul to them, and bade his billows spare To wet their silken feathers, lest they might Soil their fair plumes with water not so fair, And mar their beauties bright, That shone as heaven's light, Against their bridal day, which was not long”

      Eliot, on the other hand, paints the Thames as extremely polluted, indicating that while he borrowed the line from Spenser, he views the more popular version of “Prothalamion” as a better reflection of society. In the more known version, Jove disguises as a swan to sexually assault Leda. In this case, the swans are not actors of love, but of sexual violence. Water, often a symbol of holiness and purity, is physically polluted by industrialization and overconsumption, but is also a reflection of how society has lost its holiness with the rise of sexual assault and sexual fluidity. Going deeper into Eliot’s religious allusions, Jesus washes his disciple’s feet as an act of mutual humility.Here, the “unholy” people of the Waste Land’s River Thames wash their own feet in “soda water,” indicating that the water has been polluted by modernity (soda being a “mutated,” modern form of water and the relational modernity rising in the 20th century) and even humility has been lost.

    12. After the torchlight red on sweaty faces After the frosty silence in the gardens After the agony in stony places The shouting and the crying Prison and palace and reverberation

      The opening of this section seemed to me to reflect the structure in the beginning of Keats’ “What The Thrush Said.” Keats begins with “O thou whose face hath felt the Winter’s wind” and other such lines describing winter before writing “To thee the spring will be a harvest-time.” This repeats once more with slightly different description around light. “What the Thunder Said” begins with these lines highlighted—the second is the most explicitly wintry image, and the others become as such positioned around it. The “torchlight” fading suggests warmth and light being extinguished, as winter approaches; “frosty” feels an early winter quality; “stony places” are barren and hard, describing the frozen, unyielding quality of winter ground; the sounds of “shouting and crying” break through the wintry, “frosty,” silence as harsh winds or storms; and both “prison” and “palace” feel cold and stone-bound, echoing with emptiness. Then follows the sixth line, “Of thunder of spring over distant mountains.” This feels as/seems to function as the lines “To thee the spring will be a harvest-time” and “To thee the Spring shall be a triple morn” from Keats—presenting the rejuvenation and renewal that is to come, that is arriving. In Harrison’s study, she writes, “‘Thunder,’ said Umbara headman of the Yuin tribe, ‘is the voice of Him (and he pointed upwards to the sky) calling on the rain to fall and everything to grow up new.’” So this lovely spring thunder brings God (is God), and brings restorative rain. Interestingly, this is in opposition to the start of the poem, where April, the beginning of spring, is marked “the cruelest month.” But then, in fact, what follows is a seeming inversion of the story of Lazarus (as noted by William) and actually no water of any form. So what is left—from this dry state, to the expectation of water, to no water—is an intense thirsting. And then this is teased, with the way the second stanza goes round and round seemingly getting closer to reaching water, really—but not. Psalm 63 relates thirst to a thirst for God. I think this is definitely at play here. So again we are left with more paradoxes. God is present in the thunder, but absent with the absence of water. Spring at the beginning of “The Burial of the Dead” stirs life from death; spring here settles death (from life). How can these be reconciled?

    13. What you get married for if you don’t want children?

      Between his textual narrative of Lil and his reference to Ophelia, Eliot examines the contrast and connection between love, virginity, purity, and exploitation. Here, the speakers discuss how Lil is not taking care of her appearance and will not be appealing to her husband, then one says “What you get married for if you don’t want children?” This implies that the sole reasons for marriage are sexuality and having children, while the concept of love is not mentioned. The final line of “The Game of Chess” is “Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, / good night,” which is a reference to Ophelia’s farewell in Hamlet prior to her suicide. By ending the passage with Ophelia’s words of distress, it is implied that Ophelia’s situation is very significant to Eliot’s message. Ophelia says, in the excerpt from Hamlet, that “To-morrow is Saint Valentine's day, All in the morning betime, And I a maid at your window, To be your Valentine. Then up he rose, and donn'd his clothes, And dupp'd the chamber-door; Let in the maid, that out a maid Never departed more.” She mentions arriving at Hamlet’s window as a virgin (a maid – older description for a young unmarried virgin), looking to be his Valentine, or to find love. Ophelia leaves this meeting no longer a maid, or a virgin. Afterwards, Ophelia adds, “Before you tumbled me, You promised me to wed. So would I ha' done, by yonder sun, An thou hadst not come to my bed.” Hamlet promised to marry her, which she was ready for, but instead just slept with her and then shunned her. Ophelia seems to feel used and exploited for her body. Lil, having already lived a life of five children, chooses to resist the need to appease her husband with superficial changes to her appearance. It is almost as if Lil lived Ophelia’s life, but continued living with a different mindset, though she is still subject to the same expectations and judgement. The difference between the two women is that Lil experiences this while married, and Ophelia is a young unmarried woman. Considering the time period of the piece, having lost her virginity to a man who decides not to marry her after all, Ophelia is left “ruined” and “dishonored” in society and in future romantic relationships. Essentially, by taking her virginity without marrying her, Hamlet has sentenced Ophelia to a life without the authentic love she originally desired. Left without clear choices and grieving the loss of her father, Ophelia becomes mentally unstable and feels that she has no other option than suicide by drowning. This is significant, because water is most often viewed as spiritually pure, especially as the medium for baptism. At the start of one’s life, they are baptized, and at the end of Ophelia’s life, she drowns. So, at line 170, when the women in the bar say “goonight” to each other, they are just going home for the night. In the final line, however, when the farewells shift to Ophelia’s voice, she is saying goodbye to the “Game of Chess” – the “game” of a woman experiencing sexual exploitation and a loss of pure connection – and transitioning the reader to the next section where water (the River Thames) becomes polluted and “impure,” as well.

    1. theuniversity where the present research took place is now engaging with thefindings from the research and the implications for enhancing praxis

      本研究所在的大学目前正运用研究结果,思考如何改进实践

    1. It makes a lot of sense that the choice of words in questions impacts the results and answers from people. Asking 'how good/bad' something was instead of 'what do you think about it' directs people towards a specific answer. I wonder how many deceptive surveys do that in purpose just to attain a result they want.

  2. social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
    1. Kurt Wagner. This is how Facebook collects data on you even if you don’t have an account. Vox, April 2018. URL: https://www.vox.com/2018/4/20/17254312/facebook-shadow-profiles-data-collection-non-users-mark-zuckerberg (visited on 2023-12-05).

      I feel like this breaks a basic idea of consent : if you’ve never joined, you never agreed to be tracked. And yet the only options seem to be: accept it or avoid the web entirely, which is basically impossible. So I am question how much control I really have, If the system can build a “shadow profile” of my interests without me opting in, then is there truly any privacy left?

    1. The AT Protocol API lets you access a lot of the data that Bluesky tracks (since Bluesky is a more open social media protocol), but Bluesky probably track much more than they let you have access to (like what other social media platforms do)., but Bluesky probably track much more than they let you have access to (like what other social media platforms do).

      I think it’s interesting how the Bluesky API gives researchers access to certain data but still limits what they can see. It reminds me that even when a platform claims to be “open,” it still controls what kind of information we’re allowed to analyze. I wonder how much bias this creates in research if the data we get only shows a part.

    1. After this day, Coyote ran away and never came back for he was afraid of what he had done. He always looked over his shoulder, afraid that someone was pursuing him. Since then he has been starving because no one will give him anything to eat.

      I kind of feel bad for Coyote. because he made people sad, and now he is sad too. I think it shows when you do something bad, it can come back to you later.

    2. When at last he heard the whirlwind coming he closed the door before the whirlwind could enter.

      Why did Coyote close the door? Was he jealous or mad? Or did he just want to be right? I don’t understand what he was thinking here.

    3. Coyote jumped up and said that people ought to die forever because there was not enough food or room for everyone to live forever.

      This part reminds me of Lewis Hyde’s idea that tricksters change the world. Coyote breaks the rule and makes a big change. He brings death, so now life is different for everyone.

    1. これ、私も意味わかってなかったんですけど ... を指定すると必須だけどデフォルト値がないってこと、ですか?

    2. データ検証

      データ検証を具体的にするんでしょうか?

      私のイメージとしては、データ形式(スキーマ)を具体的にするので、結果としてそのルールでデータ検証されている。というイメージです。

      https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/models/ にも以下の様に書いてある One of the primary ways of defining schema in Pydantic is via models. Models are simply classes which inherit from BaseModel and define fields as annotated attributes.

    3. このようにPydanticは全データを検証して全部のデータをわかりやすく出してくれます。

      みたいな文章が欲しい

    4. branch = Branch(**data)

      Branchがどこから来るの? と思っちゃうので、別モジュールにして

      from model import Branch

      とか書いて欲しいかなと思った

    5. import json

      このコードの説明を書いて欲しい。 例外が発生したら errors() メソッドでその詳細を出しているよ

      みたいな

    6. 辞書で定義したものを JSON ファイルとして読み込んで確認をしてみましょう。

      これちょっとわかりにくいなと。

      最初に例示していたときはPythonの辞書で、ここで書いているのはJSONってことですかね。 もうちょっとわかりやすく説明して欲しいです。もしくは最初からJSONということで話を始めた方がよいかと

    7. 要素がリストの中に辞書が入っています

      staffの中には各スタッフを表す辞書がリストの中に入っています。とか?

      要素がリストの中に辞書が入っています。は日本語として意味がわからなかった

    8. branch = {

      コードには全部キャプションを入れて欲しいです

      ```{code-block} python :caption: ここにキャプション

      コード ```

    1. . What are the implications of compromised immune function as a result of exposure to chronic stress?

      Chronic stress can weaken the immune system, making the body less able to fight off infections and illnesses. This means that people under long-term stress are more likely to get sick from viruses or bacteria. Stress can also slow down the body’s healing process and increase the risk of chronic diseases like heart problems, diabetes, or autoimmune disorders. In addition, prolonged stress can make vaccines less effective because the immune system doesn’t respond as strongly. Overall, chronic stress can seriously reduce overall health and the body’s ability to protect itself.

    1. To be witnessed is what gives one’s life meaning; that is what gives death its cause.

      A personal belief that I really have been taught exactly in church since I was kid, and then I started to teach the kids in the sunday school the same mindset during the Persecution of the coptic christians by the muslim brotherhood, and ISIS. they were used to burn, the churches, steal, and beat the coptics - as they did to to my aunt - and kill on purpose in the name of God. So, personally I got so attached to such sentence, becasue I used to believe in this senthece every time I walk to my church in Sharm or Cairo 2013 till 2016.

    2. The procedure must be as delicate, as cognizant of the original conditions of creation in order to nurture and ensure a continuation of life.

      Such sentence is simply resembling the truth of translation in Lina's eyes in the most beautiful way. As a pianist, she used the word "transposed" as if she is describing the words as music notes in which basically means change a piece of music from its original key to a different one, either higher or lower, while keeping all the relationships between the notes the same. so trnalsating is not only changing words but keeping the rekationship and context same.

    1. As you accumulate sources, make sure you create a bibliography, or a list of sources that you’ve used in your research and writing process (keeping track of those sources will help you to create you annotated bibliography, should your instructor require one.

      keep track of the resources you use.

    2. Next, in step four, you generate sub-questions from your main question. For instance, “During the 19th century, what were some of the competing theories about how life is created?,” and “Did any of Mary Shelley’s other works relate to the creation of life?” After you know what sub-questions you want to pursue, you’ll be able to move to step five.

      create sub questions from your main question.

    3. Your main research question should be substantial enough to form the guiding principle of your paper—but focused enough to guide your research. A strong research question requires you not only to find information but also to put together different pieces of information, interpret and analyze them, and figure out what you think. As you consider potential research questions, ask yourself whether they would be too hard or too easy to answer.

      your research question should be good enough to lead your essay.

    4. Once you have a list of potential topics, you will need to choose one as the focus of your essay. You will also need to narrow your topic. Most writers find that the topics listed during the brainstorming or idea mapping stage are broad

      pick one of the topic in the list to start

    5. important to know how to narrow down your ideas into a concise, manageable thesis. You may also use the list as a starting point to help you identify additional, related topics. Discussing your ideas with your instructor will help ensure that you choose a manageable topic that fits the requirements of the assignment.

      its important to narrow down your steps and its helpful to doble check with instructor about your ideas.

    6. A successful research process should go through these steps: Decide on the topic. Narrow the topic in order to narrow search parameters. Consider a question that your research will address. Generate sub-questions from your main question. Determine what kind of sources are best for your argument. Create a bibliography as you gather and reference sources.

      succeful research process.

    7. You can also limit the time period from which you will draw resources. Do you only want articles written in the past ten or twenty years? Do you want them from a specific span of time? Again, most search engines will allow you to limit results to anything written within the years you specify, and the choice to limit the time period will depend on your topic. Determining these factors will help you form a specific research plan to guide your process.

      gather any type of resource from any time period you want.

    8. A research plan should begin after you can clearly identify the focus of your argument. Narrow the scope of your argument by identifying the specific subtopic you will research. A broad search will yield thousands of sources, which makes it difficult to form a focused, coherent argument, and it is not possible to include every topic in your research. If you narrow your focus, however, you can find targeted resources that can be synthesized into a new argument. After narrowing your focus, think about key search terms that will apply only to your subtopic. Develop specific questions that can be answered through your research process, but be careful not to choose a focus that is overly narrow. You should aim for a question that will limit search results to sources that relate to your topic, but will still result in a varied pool of sources to explore.

      you need to identify the focus of your argument

    9. Another part of your research plan should include the type of sources you want to gather. The possibilities include articles, scholarly journals, primary sources, textbooks, encyclopedias, and more.

      cite in your research plan what sources you are wanting to gather.

    10. You would also not want to search for a single instance of surgery because you might not be able to find enough information on it. Find a happy medium between a too-broad or too-specific topic to research.

      look for specific evidence in your research

    11. A research plan should begin after you can clearly identify the focus of your argument. Narrow the scope of your argument by identifying the specific subtopic you will research. A broad search will yield thousands of sources, which makes it difficult to form a focused, coherent argument, and it is not possible to include every topic in your research. If you narrow your focus, however, you can find targeted resources that can be synthesized into a new argument. After narrowing your focus, think about key search terms that will apply only to your subtopic. Develop specific questions that can be answered through your research process, but be careful not to choose a focus that is overly narrow. You should aim for a question that will limit search results to sources that relate to your topic, but will still result in a varied pool of sources to explore.

      first identify the focus of the argument then make subtopics after that make some questions that might help you do your research .

    12. Having to write a research paper may feel intimidating at first. After all, researching and writing a long paper requires time, effort, and organization. However, writing a research paper can also be a great opportunity to explore an interesting topic. The research process allows you to gain expertise on a topic of your choice, and the writing process helps you not only remember what you have learned, but also understand it on a deeper level.

      researching can help you learn more about what the topic is about.

    13. No matter what field of study you are interested in, you will most likely be asked to write a research paper during your academic career. Boundless Writing explains that a research paper is an expanded essay that relies on existing discourse to analyze a perspective or construct an argument. Because a research paper includes an extensive information-gathering process in addition to the writing process, it is important to develop a research plan to ensure your final paper will accomplish its goals. As a researcher, you have countless resources at your disposal, and it can be difficult to sift through each source while looking for specific information. If you begin researching without a plan, you could find yourself wasting hours reading sources that will be of little or no help to your paper. To save time and effort, decide on a research plan before you begin.

      you will most likely be ask for a research paper in form of an essay and in order to do all of that you need to create a plan.

    14. You will need to put your thoughts together in a logical, coherent manner. You may want to use the facts you have learned to create a narrative or to support an argument. And you may want to show the results of your research to your friends, your teachers, or even the editors of magazines and journals. Writing a research paper is an ideal way to organize thoughts, craft narratives, or make arguments based on research, and share your newfound knowledge with the world.

      after completing your research, organize it put it as an essay.

    15. But the research process does not end when you have solved your mystery. Imagine what would happen if a detective collected enough evidence to solve a criminal case, but she never shared her solution with the authorities. Presenting what you have learned from research can be just as important as performing the research. Research results can be presented in a variety of ways, but one of the most popular—and effective—presentation forms is the research paper. A research paper presents an original thesis, or purpose statement, about a topic and develops that thesis with information gathered from a variety of sources.

      present your research having a thesis and evidence

    16. The text Successful Writing stresses that when you perform research, you are essentially trying to solve a mystery—you want to know how something works or why something happened. In other words, you want to answer a question that you (and other people) have about the world. This is one of the most basic reasons for performing research.

      research is most often used when trying to solve any questions

    1. Differences in language (numbers) reflect subtle differences in cultures tools of intellectual adaptation they affect how a child learns to think.

      Asians are better at arithmetic because they learn mathematics different than the Westerns(ninthy two / nine of tens and a two)

    2. Habituation is a decrease in looking at a stimulus

      Babies will look at the new stimuli longer. Not because they like it better because they want to explore it. Once they get used to it(habituation) they will not give that much attention anymore

    3. embryonic phase, the risk of birth defects is highest (since organs are forming). In the fetal stage, alcohol mainly affects growth and brain development.

      There is a chance that child can birthed without abnormally when the mother consumed alcohol after the organs developed. (First 10 weeks)

    4. There is a well-researched difference between Westerners and non-Westerners in terms of perceiving stimuli. Americans, for example, rely more on noticing individual objects as abstract entities and separate from the background. Japanese are more likely to perceive the image and the interrelationships between objects as a whole

      Remember the fish example. Us people say there a fish swimming maybe some plants however the Japan people would also mentioned the environment the current flow where were the objects stands etc

    1. Quando houver deficit atuarial
      • Considerando que - conforme estipula o § 18 do art. 40 - a contribuição para o RPPS somente incide sobre o valor que exceder o teto do RGPS, havendo déficit atuarial, poderá incidir contribuição sobre aposentadoria e pensões que superarem o valor do salário-mínimo.
    1. Readers might wonder, “Why are they not paid enough?” But this statement does not compel them to ask many more questions. The writer should ask himself or herself questions in order to replace the linking verb with an action verb, thus forming a stronger thesis statement, one that takes a more definitive stance on the issue:

      ask yourself questions to replace the linking verbs with action verbs

    2. A joke means many things to many people. Readers bring all sorts of backgrounds and perspectives to the reading process and would need clarification for a word so vague. This expression may also be too informal for the selected audience.

      a joke could have different meaning to many different people that why you need to clarify thing.

    3. The best way to revise your thesis statement is to ask questions about it and then examine the answers to those questions. By challenging your own ideas and forming definite reasons for those ideas, you grow closer to a more precise point of view, which you can then incorporate into your thesis statement.

      revise your thesis

    4. Your thesis will probably change as you write, so you will need to modify it to reflect exactly what you have discussed in your essay.

      your thesis can change due to your essay

    5. Weak thesis statement: My paper will explain why imagination is more important than knowledge. A thesis is weak when it makes an unreasonable or outrageous claim or insults the opposing side. Weak thesis statement: Religious radicals across America are trying to legislate their Puritanical beliefs by banning required high school books. A thesis is weak when it contains an obvious fact or something that no one can disagree with or provides a dead end.

      weak thesis contain obvious facts and cant be argued

    6. In addition to creating authority in your thesis statement, you must also use confidence in your claim. Phrases such as “I feel” or “I believe” actually weaken the readers’ sense of your confidence because these phrases imply that you are the only person who feels the way you do. In other words, your stance has insufficient backing.

      you need to have confident words included in the thesis.

    7. Ability to be argued A thesis statement must present a relevant and specific argument. A factual statement often is not considered arguable. Be sure your thesis statement contains a point of view that can be supported with evidence.

      a thesis has to be able to be argued

    8. Specificity A thesis statement must concentrate on a specific area of a general topic. As you may recall, the creation of a thesis statement begins when you choose a broad subject and then narrow down its parts until you pinpoint a specific aspect of that topic.

      a thesis has to be specific.

    9. A thesis is not your paper’s topic, but rather your interpretation of the question or subject. For whatever topic your professor gives you, you must ask yourself, “What do I want to write about it?” Asking and then answering this question is vital to forming a thesis that is precise, forceful, and confident. A thesis is generally one to two sentences long and appears toward the end of your introduction. It is specific and focuses on one to three points of a single idea—points that will be demonstrated in the body. The thesis forecasts the content of the essay and suggests how you will organize your information. Remember that a thesis statement does not summarize an issue but rather dissects it.

      A thesis is not the topic of your essay instead it is the interpretation of the essay like what are the key points.

    1. Wash they his wounds with tears: mine shall be spent, When theirs are dry, for Romeo's banishment. 1855Take up those cords: poor ropes, you are beguiled, Both you and I; for Romeo is exiled: He made you for a highway to my bed; But I, a maid, die maiden-widowed. Come, cords, come, nurse; I'll to my wedding-bed; 1860And death, not Romeo, take my maidenhead! Nurse. Hie to your chamber: I'll find Romeo To comfort you: I wot well where he is. Hark ye, your Romeo will be here at night: I'll to him; he is hid at Laurence' cell. 1865 Juliet. O, find him! give this ring to my true knight, And bid him come to take his last farewell.

      JULIET IS HIT WITH THE SHOCKING NEWS, TYBALT IS DEAD AND ROMEO, HER MEW HUSBAND HAS BEEN BANISHED FOR KILLING HIM, SHE CALLS ROMEO “beautiful tyrant” , “fiend angelica SHOWING HER DEEP CONFUSION AND HEARTBREAK

      THEN SHE REALIZES HER LOYALTY BELONGS TO HER HUSBAND NOW

    2. Not Romeo, prince, he was Mercutio's friend

      Lord Montague says Romeo shouldn’t die because he only did what the law would, he argues that Romeo acted out of justice, not murder. He wants the prince to spare his son,s life,

    3. And to 't they go like lightning, for, ere I 1690Could draw to part them, was stout Tybalt slain. And, as he fell, did Romeo turn and fly. This is the truth, or let Benvolio die. Lady Capulet. He is a kinsman to the Montague; Affection makes him false; he speaks not true: 1695Some twenty of them fought in this black strife, And all those twenty could but kill one life. I beg for justice, which thou, prince, must give; Romeo slew Tybalt, Romeo must not live.

      Benvolio says Tybalt began the fight, not Romeo , he explains how Romeo tried to calm Tybalt and spoke kindly but Tybalt ignored peace and attacked Mercutio leading to chaos. When Tybalt came back to Romeo after Mercutio’s death. Since Romeo was mourning the death He agreed to fight tybalt and killed him.

      Lady capulet doesn’t believe Benvolio because he is related to Romeo.

    4. Tybalt, my cousin! O my brother's child! O prince! O cousin! husband! O, the blood is s

      Lady capulet is very sad about tybalt and asks prince for revenge

    5. O Romeo, Romeo, brave Mercutio's dead! That gallant spirit hath aspired the clouds, 1625Which too untimely here did scorn the earth. Romeo. This day's black fate on more days doth depend; This but begins the woe, others must end. Benvolio. Here comes the furious Tybalt back again. Romeo. Alive, in triumph! and Mercutio slain! 1630Away to heaven, respective lenity,

      Benvolio returns and tells Romeo that Mercutio is dead. He mentions he was a good man went up to heaven. Romeo says bad days just began

    6. Benvolio. We talk here in the public haunt of men: Either withdraw unto some private place, And reason coldly of your grievances, Or else depart; here all eyes gaze on us. 1550 Mercutio. Men's eyes were made to look, and let them gaze; I will not budge for no man's pleasure, I.

      Benvolio, concerned about fighting out in public but Mercutio isn’t worried about fighting in front of people

    1. imperialism and imperialist internationalism across Africa.

      Imperialism is the policy of extending a nation's power and influence over foreign countries through direct territorial acquisition or by gaining indirect political and economic control

    2. The Congo crisis challenged how the superpowers and the United Nations managed the process of decolonization and fundamentally impacted the relationship between the West and the post-colonial world.

      The impact of the West and the colonial world on the severity of the upkeep.

    1. fourth row of the table reportsthe performance of adding APOE data to the model using demographicfeatures, resulting in an AUC and F1 score of 71.7% and 75.7%

      Did adding APOE lower the accuracy? Nope thats using APOE alone

    2. As depicted in Figure 5, our analysis revealed that subtests relatedto demographic questions (DEMO), BNT, similarity tests (OTHER), andWAIS emerged as the top features driving the performance of ourmodel

      This is contradictory. They said demographics don't matter but now they claim these tests as most important

    3. The Results section indicates that adding demographic features totext features does not enhance the model’s ability to predict the pro-gression from MCI to AD. This contrasts with previous assumptionsabout the predictive power of age and other demographics in relationto degenerative diseases over extended periods.

      Does this hold for other studies too?

    4. AD with an accuracy of 78.2% and a sensitivity of 81.1% in the held-out test data, demonstrating strong predictive power over a 6-yearspan

      Accuracy encompasses both sensitivity and specificity

      So the model overall accurate but lacking in specificity (tends to have more false positives)

    5. Demographics

      Text + Demographics + APOE + Health = 78.5/79.9 highest score as expected

      Text alone: 77.8/79.4 (so it doesn't look like adding in the other info helped a a lot)

      Traditional neuropsychological tests: 71.3/75.5

      Demographics alone: 68.8/71.1

    6. subsequent two rows highlight modelsthat leverage text features along with readily available demographicdata such as age, sex, and education, also demonstrating strong predic-tive capabilities with an AUC and F1 score of 77.8% and 79.4% for ourNLP model using only text features

      so this trial they used less detailed demographic information and were still able to get a pretty accurate result

    7. The first row showcases the model’s per-formance, incorporating text, demographics, APOE, and health factors,achieving an AUC of 78.5% and an F1 score of 79.9%, marking the high-est effectiveness observed.

      How much of the predictability is coming from the speech recognition and how much is coming from the other factors it is also accounting for (demographic, health factors, apolipoprotein E)? Now that is a specific question...

    8. 10%for testing

      used the same population for testing so not really independent testing. Would be interesting to see how it held up with a completely unrelated group of people. Potentially wouldn't hold up as well.

    9. y leveraging transformer-based language models, weaim to capture semantic nuances potentially missed by conventionalscoring, enriching the assessment with comprehensive text features

      A Transformer is a neural network architecture introduced by Google. It revolutionized how machines understand and generate sequences

      Instead of processing words one at a time, transformers look at all words in a sequence simultaneously and use a mechanism called self-attention to understand how each word relates to every other word.

      Self-Attention Mechanism Each token “looks” at other tokens in the sentence and assigns attention weights — numbers that represent how important each word is to understanding the current one.

      Example: In the sentence “The patient who had pneumonia was discharged.”, the word “was” should pay more attention to “patient” than to “pneumonia.” The self-attention mechanism captures this context automatically.

      1. Stacked Layers

      Many layers of self-attention and feed-forward networks are stacked.

      Each layer learns increasingly abstract relationships — syntax, semantics, and even reasoning patterns.

    10. Our findings, derived from the neuropsycho-logical test interviews conducted by the FraminghamHeart Study, demonstrate strong performance, achievingan accuracy rate of 78.5% and a sensitivity of 81.1% inpredicting progression to AD within 6 years.

      Okay so it works pretty good...what are some next steps? Application to a different disease that affects speech?

    11. The proposed method offers a fully automated procedure, providingan opportunity to develop an inexpensive, broadly accessible, and easy-to-administerscreening tool for MCI-to-AD progression prediction, facilitating development ofremote assessment.

      Okay there is value in this because it another way to help differentiate between MCI and Alzhimer's. Risk stratification, get them a MRI, then potentially some of the drugs that can prevent plaques and tangles from forming

    12. We applied natural language processing techniques along with machinelearning methods to develop a method for automated prediction of progression to ADwithin 6 years using speech

      OKAY a primary research article

  3. accessmedicina.mhmedical.com accessmedicina.mhmedical.com
    1. McQuaid KR. McQuaid K.R. McQuaid, Kenneth R.Apendicitis. In: Papadakis MA, Rabow MW, McQuaid KR, Gandhi M. Papadakis M.A., & Rabow M.W., & McQuaid K.R., & Gandhi M(Eds.),Eds. Maxine A. Papadakis, et al.eds. Diagnóstico clínico y tratamiento 2025. McGraw Hill Education; 2025. Accessed octubre 18, 2025. https://accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3530&sectionid=294839301

      hj

    1. Tables are an intuitive input format for machine learning models. You can imagine each row of the table as an example and each column as a potential feature or label. That said, datasets may also be derived from other formats, including log files and protocol buffers.

      tables are just very helpful way to look at data for machine learning modeling

    2. Many datasets store data in tables (grids), for example, as comma-separated values (CSV) or directly from spreadsheets or database tables.

      comma-separated values is what csv stands for i never knew that

    1. Yes, ML practitioners spend the majority of their time constructing datasets and doing feature engineering.

      as everyone has told me, 90% of ML is data

    2. Data trumps all. The quality and size of the dataset matters much more than which shiny algorithm you use to build your model.

      Data is extaordinarily important, literally one of the reasons im planning to go through all this now before i start going through my data, you can have a good loss function, but ultimately its all dependent on your data

    1. Consult your instructor because they will often specify what resources you are required to use.

      I need to make sure to ask the professor if i am doing things the right way.

    1. enerative classifiers and“other” methods, mainly consisting of studies which combinedmultiple AI algorithms to generate novel or complex classifica-tion tools were difficult to categorize; each constituted 10% ofthe literature. Most of these studies focused heavily on com-putational methods which are not easily accessible to a clinicalaudience

      Generative: creating new categories/classifications in which to place data points (finding new patterns in complex data sets). Not used as much. Potential for a question here?

    Annotators

    1. @SmartSceptic

      Как применить идеи из эссе в жизни:

      Тарские определения работают в рамках разговров с людьми. Это похоже на разговор с помощью "я", "ты" сообщений.

      Вместо того, чтобы давать определение "плохой" или "хороший", можно использовать тарские определеиня.

      Определять что реально наблюдается: сделанное действие, например или намерение.

    2. Если вы теряетесь, пытаясь понять метафору «ведёрок и камней» как метафору, попробуйте понять её буквально.

      Лучше бы он просил воспринимать остаток текста как метафору. Ведь когда по просьбе автора пытаешься понять буквально - все голова взрывается от отсылок.

    3. @SmartSceptic

      Как применить идеи из эссе в жизни:

      При встрече демагога (таких как Марк) можно обернуть рассуждения, постоянно "стукая" их об реальность.

      Попросить прийти к практическим результатам исходя из их рассуждений.

    4. Всё, что вы едите, должно быть во рту. Может ли еда существовать вне рта? Это бессмысленно, что доказывает, что «еда» — это несвязная идея. Поэтому мы все голодаем до смерти, еды не существует.

      отличная аналогия в споре про солипсизм

    5. @SmartSceptic

      О чем эссе:

      Юдковский в несвойственной себе манерет, в самом начале эссе делает небольшое резюме основной идеи.

      Восстановить наивные представления о истине

      Цитата от @SmartSceptic

      Юдковски говорит: посмотрите на то, как вы выглядите со стороны.

    6. О чем эссе:

      • @HardQA : В спорах когда мы добавляем научных аргументов, иногда переходим на переход обсуждение концепции истины, в особенно часто в интернет дискусиях. Эссе направляет на мысль что спорить о истине бесполезно намного полезнее вернутся к изначальной теме спора (карта и територия).<br /> Спор относительно истины имеет смысл насколько твоя карта соответсвует твоей територии
      • Замысловатус пытается разными путями увести обсуждение в демагогию и софистику, а главный герой спускается на предметный уровень.
      • Бесполезно производить споры об определениях.
  4. www.planalto.gov.br www.planalto.gov.br
    1. § 14
      • Informativo 1177
      • AR 2876 QO / DF
      • Órgão julgador: Tribunal Pleno
      • Relator(a): Min. GILMAR MENDES
      • Julgamento: 23/04/2025 (Presencial)
      • Ramo do Direito: Processual Civil
      • Matéria: Ação Rescisória; Questão de Ordem; Decisão Superveniente do STF; Coisa Julgada; Efeitos Temporais

      Ação rescisória: prazo para ajuizamento nos casos de decisão superveniente do STF declarando a inconstitucionalidade de norma

      Tese fixada

      O § 15 do art. 525 e o § 8º do art. 535 do Código de Processo Civil devem ser interpretados conforme à Constituição, com efeitos ex nunc, no seguinte sentido, com a declaração incidental de inconstitucionalidade do § 14 do art. 525 e do § 7º do art. 535:

        1. Em cada caso, o Supremo Tribunal Federal poderá definir os efeitos temporais de seus precedentes vinculantes e sua repercussão sobre a coisa julgada, estabelecendo inclusive a extensão da retroação para fins da ação rescisória ou mesmo o seu não cabimento diante do grave risco de lesão à segurança jurídica ou ao interesse social.
        1. Na ausência de manifestação expressa, os efeitos retroativos de eventual rescisão não excederão cinco anos da data do ajuizamento da ação rescisória, a qual deverá ser proposta no prazo decadencial de dois anos contados do trânsito em julgado da decisão do STF.
        1. O interessado poderá apresentar a arguição de inexigibilidade do título executivo judicial amparado em norma jurídica ou interpretação jurisdicional considerada inconstitucional pelo STF, seja a decisão do STF <u>anterior ou posterior</u> ao trânsito em julgado da decisão exequenda, salvo preclusão (Código de Processo Civil, arts. 525, caput, e 535, caput).”

      Resumo

      Os efeitos temporais das decisões do STF e o prazo para o ajuizamento de ação rescisória podem ser definidos caso a caso pela Corte e, em hipóteses de grave risco de lesão à segurança jurídica ou ao interesse social, é possível estabelecer o não cabimento da ação.

      • Essas prerrogativas objetivam equilibrar a necessidade de corrigir decisões baseadas em fundamentos que o próprio Tribunal declarou inconstitucionais com o princípio da segurança jurídica e a estabilidade das relações jurídicas já consolidadas pela coisa julgada.

      • Ademais, quando esta Corte não definir, de forma expressa, a partir de quando seus precedentes vinculantes devem valer no tempo, a eficácia retroativa para fins de propositura de ação rescisória fica limitada ao período de até cinco anos anteriores à data de seu ajuizamento, observando-se, em todo caso, o prazo decadencial de dois anos a contar do trânsito em julgado da decisão que fundamenta o pedido rescisório.

      • Por fim, ressalvados os casos de preclusão (1), admite-se a arguição da inexigibilidade de título executivo judicial fundado em interpretação judicial ou em norma declaradas inconstitucionais pelo STF, <u>independentemente da anterioridade ou posterioridade</u> dessa decisão em relação ao trânsito em julgado da sentença exequenda.

      • Com base nesses entendimentos, o Plenário resolveu questão de ordem e fixou a tese anteriormente citada, com ressalvas de alguns ministros ao ponto 2. Vale destacar que, nessa sessão de julgamento, decidiu-se apenas a questão de ordem, de modo que a análise do caso concreto deverá ocorrer já se considerando as diretrizes ora fixadas.

    2. indeferirá
      • Falta de emenda à inicial = não precisa intimar pessoalmente o autor - Prazo <u>15</u> dias;

      • Abandono de causa = precisa intimar pessoalmente o autor - Prazo <u>5</u> dias (art. 485, § 1º)


      Art. 485. O juiz não resolverá o mérito quando: - II - o processo ficar parado durante mais de 1 (um) ano por negligência das partes;

      • III - por não promover os atos e as diligências que lhe incumbir, o autor abandonar a causa por mais de 30 (trinta) dias;

      § 1º Nas hipóteses descritas nos incisos II e III, a parte será intimada <u>pessoalmente</u> para suprir a falta no prazo de 5 (cinco) dias.

    1. impostos sobre a renda

      Imposto de renda não é causa para revisão do contrato. Demais alterações tributárias poderão dar ensejo á revisão dos valores do contrato.

    2. fixada
      • Tarifa = Fixada pela proposta vencedora da licitação;

      • <u>Revisão</u> da tarifa = regras previstas em lei, contrato e edital

  5. Oct 2025
    1. nightingale

      Eliot’s “The Game of Chess" and its referenced sources characterize women (or the queen piece) as the real pawns of society, exploited by men (the king piece) despite their power. Eliot begins the section with “The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne, / Glowed on the marble…” In older versions of chess, specifically the marble-like Lewis chessmen, the queen piece sits on an elaborate throne, cradling her head in her hand with a tired expression. So, Eliot's description aligns closely with the chess piece of the Queen. At the same time, this description is a direct reference to Antony and Cleopatra: “The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne, Glowed on the marble.” So, The Game of Chess begins with Cleopatra, the queen of Egypt and one of the most well known women of immense power labeled a seductress. In fact, the six assigned sources all display women used as scapegoats, always described but never given a chance to never given a chance to stand up for themselves. They are used as pawns in literature, society, and history. Further, these women are almost all associated deeply with snakes, or a symbol for the devil in many works. The foundation of this comparison is shown in Paradise Lost, as Eve is tempted by a serpent, or the devil, and then is blamed alongside the serpent for eternity. Notably, Cleopatra kills herself with an asp, or a serpent, to escape a future of humiliation at the expense of being forever silenced. In Ovid, Philomela’s tongue is cut out because the king dislikes her words, and severed tongue is compared to a snake. By taking away her tongue, or her voice, the king seems to believe he has stunted her ability to tempt and manipulate. In Baudelaire, he writes “The haunches slightly sharp, and the waist sinuous / As a snake poised to strike, / That she's still quite young!” Even as the woman is described in an undone state, she is still viewed as “a snake poised to strike.” Tying these references back to the text, Eliot argues through his characterization of “ the nightingale Filled all the desert with inviolable voice And still she cried, and still the world pursues,” that these women are labeled snakes, always poised to strike and poison others with their cunning manipulation, while they are truly nightingales, only afforded a grieving voice in the night. The thread is clear of women being exploited by men then blamed by those same men and the rest of society without a chance to share their voice.

  6. www.planalto.gov.br www.planalto.gov.br
    1. reajustamento de preços

      Observação:

      Art. 135. Os preços dos contratos para serviços contínuos com regime de dedicação exclusiva de mão de obra ou com predominância de mão de obra serão repactuados para manutenção do equilíbrio econômico-financeiro, mediante demonstração analítica da variação dos custos contratuais, com data vinculada:

      • I - à da apresentação da proposta, para custos decorrentes do mercado;

      • II - ao acordo, à convenção coletiva ou ao dissídio coletivo ao qual a proposta esteja vinculada, para os custos de mão de obra.

      § 1º A Administração não se vinculará às disposições contidas em acordos, convenções ou dissídios coletivos de trabalho que tratem de matéria não trabalhista, de pagamento de participação dos trabalhadores nos lucros ou resultados do contratado, ou que estabeleçam direitos não previstos em lei, como valores ou índices obrigatórios de encargos sociais ou previdenciários, bem como de preços para os insumos relacionados ao exercício da atividade.

      § 2º É vedado a órgão ou entidade contratante vincular-se às disposições previstas nos acordos, convenções ou dissídios coletivos de trabalho que tratem de obrigações e direitos que somente se aplicam aos contratos com a Administração Pública.

      § 3º A repactuação deverá observar o interregno mínimo de 1 (um) ano, contado da data da apresentação da proposta ou da data da última repactuação.

      § 4º A repactuação poderá ser dividida em tantas parcelas quantas forem necessárias, observado o princípio da anualidade do reajuste de preços da contratação, podendo ser realizada em momentos distintos para discutir a variação de custos que tenham sua anualidade resultante em datas diferenciadas, como os decorrentes de mão de obra e os decorrentes dos insumos necessários à execução dos serviços.

      § 5º Quando a contratação envolver mais de uma categoria profissional, a repactuação a que se refere o inciso II do caput deste artigo poderá ser dividida em tantos quantos forem os acordos, convenções ou dissídios coletivos de trabalho das categorias envolvidas na contratação.

      § 6º A repactuação será precedida de solicitação do contratado, acompanhada de demonstração analítica da variação dos custos, por meio de apresentação da planilha de custos e formação de preços, ou do novo acordo, convenção ou sentença normativa que fundamenta a repactuação.

    1. Маркосом Замысловатусом Максимусом, представителем Сената Рума. (Интересно, а что если бы кто-то другой украл этот значок? Но сила подобных знаков настолько велика, что этот кто-то, укради он знак, мгновенно превратился бы в Маркоса.)

      Первое появление Замысловатуса и одна из отсылка к истинности, которая может определяется значком ?

    2. Многие люди, поставленные перед этим вопросом, не будут знать, как ответить с достаточной точностью. Тем не менее, будет крайне неразумным отказаться от концепции истины. Было время, когда никто не знал точную формулу тяготения – и всё же, шагнув с обрыва, вы бы разбились и тогда. Часто, особенно в интернет-дискуссиях, я встречал чьи-то заявления «X истинно», а дальше спор поворачивал в сторону поиска определения истины

      Думаю, эта часть эссе отлично передает основной его смысл и даже подчеркивает связь с концовкой.

      Сложно ответить на вопрос, что называть истиной, но инутивно мы понимаем ее связь с нашими предсказаниями.

    3. если вы в точности знаете, как работает система, вы сами можете построить её аналог из ведёрок и камней

      В таком виде утверждение ложно. Я могу быть банально "ограничен технологиями своего времени" или доступными ресурсами.

      Вбоквел мысль: Можно обсудить степени компетентности

    4. Очевидный выбор не всегда наилучший, но всё-таки иногда, черт возьми, он таков. Я не перестаю искать, когда встречаю очевидный ответ, но если по мере повышения моей информированности ответ всё ещё выглядит очевидным, то я не вижу вины в том, чтобы использовать его

      Очевидное, но от этого не менее сильное заявление (на первый взгляд) Хочется обсудить что в такой форме, без конкретики и ограничений на слова не всегда ** и Иногда ** несет мало практичесского смысла...

    5. Это эссе ни в коем случае не является энциклопедическим ответом на этот вопрос. Скорее я надеюсь, что спорщики прочтут это эссе, а затем вернутся к изначальному вопросу

      Еще одно уточненное заявление о цели эссе

    6. эссе написано, чтобы восстановить наивное представление об истине.

      Автор в отличие от многих других заявил цель эссе

    1. Additionally, groups keep trying to re-invent old debunked pseudo-scientific (and racist) methods of judging people based on facial features (size of nose, chin, forehead, etc.), but now using artificial intelligence [h10]. Social media data can also be used to infer information about larger social trends like the spread of misinformation [h11]. One particularly striking example of an attempt to infer information from seemingly unconnected data was someone noticing that the number of people sick with COVID-19 correlated with how many people were leaving bad reviews of Yankee Candles saying “they don’t have any scent” (note: COVID-19 can cause a loss of the ability to smell):

      It’s really shocking to realize how much personal information can be inferred from simple online behavior. The idea that AI or data mining can guess someone’s sexual orientation or addiction tendency just from their friend list or social activity feels invasive and unethical. I personally think it crosses a line between public and private life.

      At the same time, I understand why companies want to use data to “predict” users—it’s part of how social media algorithms work. But when this data is used to judge people’s race or personality through pseudo-scientific facial recognition, it becomes a form of digital discrimination. It makes me wonder if we are gradually losing control of our identities online.

    1. 在该教程中,BERT模型预测的开始位置和结束位置,均是针对输入的“问题-文本”拼接序列中的文本部分(即回答来源文本) 而言,目标是定位该文本中能够回答问题的片段的起始与终止边界。以下是具体拆解说明:

      1. 输入结构:“问题-文本”的拼接规则

      SQuAD任务的核心是“给定问题和一段包含答案的文本,从文本中提取答案片段”,因此模型输入需先将“问题”和“文本”按固定格式拼接,具体规则在教程的construct_input_ref_pair函数中定义: - 拼接顺序:[CLS] + 问题 tokens + [SEP] + 文本 tokens + [SEP] - [CLS]:BERT的特殊起始token,用于整体序列表示; - [SEP]:特殊分隔token,第一个[SEP]分隔“问题”和“文本”,第二个[SEP]标记整个序列的结束; - 示例(教程中的输入): - 问题:What is important to us? - 文本:It is important to us to include, empower and support humans of all kinds. - 拼接后完整序列(含token索引): [CLS](0) what(1) is(2) important(3) to(4) us(5) ?(6) [SEP](7) # 问题部分(0-7) it(8) is(9) important(10) to(11) us(12) to(13) include(14) ,(15) em(16) ##power(17) and(18) support(19) humans(20) of(21) all(22) kinds(23) .(24) [SEP](25) # 文本部分(8-25)

      2. 预测目标:定位“文本部分”中的答案片段

      模型预测的“开始位置”和“结束位置”,是答案片段在上述完整拼接序列中的token索引,但这些索引必然落在“文本部分”(即第一个[SEP]之后、第二个[SEP]之前的区域,教程示例中为索引8-24),原因如下: - SQuAD任务的定义决定:答案只能从“文本”中提取,而非“问题”; - 教程中的验证: - 真实答案(ground truth):to include, empower and support humans of all kinds,对应文本部分的token索引13(to)-23(kinds); - 模型预测结果:to include , em ##power and support humans of all kinds,对应索引13-23,与真实答案的位置完全匹配(见教程中print('Predicted Answer: ...')的输出); - 归因分析佐证:教程中“结束位置预测”的归因结果显示,kinds(索引23,文本部分的关键token)的归因分数最高,进一步说明预测目标是“文本部分的答案边界”。

      3. 关键辅助机制:token_type_ids区分“问题”与“文本”

      为避免模型混淆“问题”和“文本”,教程通过construct_input_ref_token_type_pair函数生成token_type_ids(序列类型标识),明确划分两部分: - token_type_ids=0:对应“问题部分”(从[CLS]到第一个[SEP],示例中索引0-7); - token_type_ids=1:对应“文本部分”(从第一个[SEP]到第二个[SEP],示例中索引8-25); - 模型在训练时会学习到“答案仅来自token_type_ids=1的区域”,因此预测的开始/结束位置会自动约束在该区域内。

      总结

      模型预测的“开始位置”和“结束位置”,是SQuAD任务中“答案片段”在“问题-文本拼接序列”中的token索引,且这些索引必然属于“文本部分”(即第一个[SEP]之后、第二个[SEP]之前的区域)——本质是定位“文本中能够回答问题的片段的起始和终止token”。

    1. However, xAI has been clear that this control technology has not been installed. An xAI consultant told The Daily Journal that the turbines would have to be retrofitted to install them. No one has claimed credit for the mailer sent by “Facts Over Fear.”

      Wow, the bare faced lie on it, too.