116 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Rule 38 - Right to Trial by Jury(a) Exercise of Right. Upon the filing of a demand and the simultaneous payment of the requisite jury fee by any party in actions wherein a trial by jury is provided by constitution or by statute, including actions for the recovery of specific real or personal property, with or without damages, or for money claimed as due on contract, or as damages for breach of contract, or for injuries to person or property, all issues of fact shall be tried by a jury. The jury fee is not refundable; however, a demanding party may waive that party's demand for trial by jury pursuant to section (e) of this rule.

      Fuck you haley...gonna have your fucking license

      "Upon filing of a demand by any party wherein a trial by jury is provided by statute, all issues of fact shall be tried by a jury"

      See: https://hyp.is/go?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcasetext.com%2Fstatute%2Fcolorado-revised-statutes%2Ftitle-19-childrens-code%2Farticle-3-dependency-and-neglect%2Fpart-2-general-provisions%2Fsection-19-3-202-effective-until-112024-right-to-counsel-and-jury-trial&group=world

    1. respondent, the guardian ad litem for the child, or a child who is twelve years of age or older may demand a trial by jury of six persons at the adjudicatory hearing pursuant to section 19-3-505 , or the court, on its own motion, may order such a jury to try any case at the adjudicatory hearing pursuant to section 19-3-505 .

      TRIAL BY JURY MANDATED....HALEY....YOU FUCKING SHAMEFUL INEXCUSABLE IMPOSTER OF AN ATTORNEY. Shaun, do you know about this? Does an appeal attorney for ORPC know the D&N law of which he'll be making appeals?

      See: https://hyp.is/go?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcasetext.com%2Frule%2Fcolorado-court-rules%2Fcolorado-rules-of-civil-procedure%2Fchapter-5-trials%2Frule-38-right-to-trial-by-jury&group=world

    2. the court shall advise the respondent of the minimum and maximum time frames for the dependency and neglect process, including the minimum and maximum time frames for adjudication, disposition, and termination of parental rights for

      I don't remember her doing this. She sure as fuck didn't execute it.

  2. Sep 2023
    1. irst, judges do not receive sufficient information to make aninformed decision regarding reasonable efforts. Usually, the only information comes from the agency

      Haylie is not providing any information to the judge, e.g.: - harboring not addressed - intake lied - intake failed to meet promise - intake actually DROVE removal, as in "negative reasonable efforts" - intake did not provide allegations at first contact or ever; and also therefore, 2., did not collect response, and necessary danger data and necessary services/needs data - intake did not provide, therefore, a credible report informing court of true nature - intake offered no FFPSA designated services nor Core Services Program services - intake provided no list of services offered/provided, no list of identified needs, no explanation of how it succeeded or failed - magistrate did not examine, inquire, or document specifically and detailed the reasonable efforts in "The Prevention Plan"...I've seen no Prevention Plan and certainly not filed with the court - Visitation scheduler: 1) not competently trained in youth or resist and refuse; only 1.5 years licensed (probably no clinical practice) and self identified adult addiction, 2)provided no scientific backing for recommendations, omitted context to misrepresent truth, did not identify needs, provided no plan to resolve/address those needs especially science-backed (and found to be an intern), 3)was 3+ weeks late for 1wk due date - caseworker was assigned over a month later and is mandated to be immediate at time of 1st hearing - CASA was not assigned until 4 months later and i've still never heard from them - caseworker was told must provide allegations report and still did not and would not - family needs assessment was never done, certainly not in my presence, nor with my collaboration and agreement, if in the background there is one it is a lie or of completely insufficient quality and was not reported to me when asked for. It was not done even close to 60 day (therefore also does not meet mandate of "timely") deadline (and if it's dated as such it is a complete BS non-assessment only for the purposes of making it show up on a log as done). It does not identify needs/problems (most importantly resist/refuse) that brought forth D&N, it does not identify services that address the particular needs (most importantly a resist/refuse doctor; also actively blocked FUP) (and therefore nothing is science based "trauma informed" as mandated), it does not mandate what must be changed/achieved and the marker for that achievement; I still was not given Service Plan when I pried and pried for clear list of items that brought forth D&N-what was needed to change/achieved to end State's involvement-what services were/could/wanted to be done - DHS has failed to investigate it's actions of abuse to confirm/deny; which in the case that abuse did not happen 2. has failed to meet "timely" mandate of services to medically assess and treat resist/refuse and 3. failed "reasonable efforts to reunify" mandate - DHS has not only 1. failed mandate to offer/make available/refer & monitor and ensure execution of services/ (e.g. Core, FFPSA, "unique to family needs", "public or private/community bases", "evidenced based", "trauma informed...further defined in CCR as "complete situation assessment/treatment, whole family") they 2. made ME responsible for REFERRING THEM and with an expectation it likely WOULD NOT BE PURSUED, 3. was essentially told Core Services wasn't real (was ignored and then simply would not answer when i asked directly in-person about "Core Services" and changed the subject) when I specifically asked, 4. mocked when I gave science backed warning of imminent and severe risk and necessary doctor services needed - court did not set adjudication until 2+ months past federally mandated 90 day MAXIMUM (and is written as "should be much sooner and ASAP", and 2. almost 4 months after 20th District's filed D&N management commitment plan - Independent Assessment: did not meet many many mandates (see email to Haylie on objection to recommendation) - QI did not include family, claims 6 attempts to call but did not as mandated provide evidence of attempts, State did not meet mandate to make sure family was included in the process and ACTIVELY KEPT MOM & DAD & ATTORNEYS as mandated of the mandated Family and Permancy Team Meeting; did not complete in 10/14 day CDHS mandate nor did complete in 30 day federal requirement (which is also contractually owed by ASO); never held a 2nd Team meeting as requested (which resulted in a ruling based on false argument that would have been quashed in the meeting and also the QI realizing and changing her recommendations with the knowledge that the false claim was not only indeed false but that the credibility of information provided by state & CYF was now in question; and ultimately a result of a QI would have full & true understanding of medical need and severity and harm befalling child and family and would have urgently recommended necessary interventions which had so long been failed to be recognized/provided by State) - Court nor State was informed of fundamental FFPSA law as is absolutely expected to be known by a Child Welfare Judge and Child Welfare Attorney and Child Welfare Agency, at QRTP Assessment Review Hearing and made ruling on completely false law justification that child is not legally allowed to remain at the QRTP [b/c of course she is, which is the whole point of the hearing, b/c it's up to judge to determine if she should stay or not regardless of IA summary report recommendations

    2. One conclusion this book reaches is that reasonable efforts should belitigated early,
    1. although the judge may agree there are no material issues of fact remaining for trial, the judge may also find that it is the non-moving party that is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
    2. In the United States, the presiding judge generally must find there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law."[2

      Really Haley?? You could not argue that,

      1) there was no genuine dispute over the material facts....over "what happened, AND what realities/possibilities/options/resources/outcomes exist" ????

      2) that I was not entitled to "judgment" regardless of "material facts being in dispute" OR NOT "in dispute". For starters, a for a trial review of the facts regarding the determination of grounds that have been brought forth, not brought forth, and mis-presented, and additional are due and necessitate the compelling process of discovery in order to assure provision of, and of which a collection is already known by respondent and counsel to exist which the court has not been made of and who's determined clarity resulting from the analytical vetting the trial will provide holds the potential power to not just determine whether the state had grounds, but regardless of that outcome, to help all parties determine collaboratively and aided by the authoritative might of the court how the state can best provide help and services going forward, including if appropriate removing themselves from intruding a moment further in this family's lives and liberties. .... FACTS I'VE BEEN SHOUTING AT YOU FROM DAY ONE AND IN A MILLION EMAILS TO YOU OR BEEN CCED. YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON, BY WAY OF UNLAWFUL COMPETENCY OR NEGLECT TO YOUR CASE, YOUR DUTY TO SELF INFORM, AN ENTRUSTED BY AND SWORN TO THE PEOPLE OATH, AND YOUR KNOWN DUTY TO THE DEADLY VALUE, PURPOSE, AND CONSEQUENCE OF YOUR POST, a post for which you are additionally compelled to perform by, albeit less importantly, a meaningful wage.

  3. Aug 2023
    1. The question is also not about error handling and if the file write fails, exiting with a stack trace is reasonable default behavior because there's not much you can do to recover from that.
  4. Jun 2023
    1. The general assembly, however, recognizes that certain information obtained in the course of the implementation of this title is highly sensitive and has an impact on the privacy of children and members of their families. The disclosure of sensitive information carries the risk of stigmatizing children

      Reasonable Efforts - not so much RE as it's criminal malpractice. Jackie released confidential case information, purposefully AND misrepresented it. Also CCR 7.601 protect confidentiality. 12 CCR 2509-7 https://hyp.is/UaaebvvTEe2eeDeCZWyDVw/docdrop.org/download_annotation_doc/12-CCR-2509-7-43cgo.pdf

    1. By default, Google tags use automatic cookie domain configuration. Cookies are set on the highest level of domain possible. For example, if your website address is blog.example.com, cookies are set on the example.com domain.
  5. May 2023
    1. we do not foreseethis changing in the near future.

      You don't do you? ....but reunification "is the goal" right Jackie?

    2. Jackie

      Jackie (FCS) is prohibited from sharing any information about the case

      Reasonable Efforts - not so much RE as it's criminal malpractice. Jackie released confidential case information, purposefully AND misrepresented it. Also CCR 7.601 protect confidentiality. 12 CCR 2509-7 https://hyp.is/UaaebvvTEe2eeDeCZWyDVw/docdrop.org/download_annotation_doc/12-CCR-2509-7-43cgo.pdf

    1. ColoradohasastrongfoundationandhistoryofprovidingpreventionandearlyinterventionservicesthroughtheuseofCoreServices,IV-EWaiverinterventions,CMPsandintegratedhumanservicesdelivery

      As previously described, Colorado has a strong foundation and history of providing prevention and early intervention services through the use of Core Services, IV-E Waiver interventions, CMPs and integrated human services delivery. In addition,

  6. Apr 2023
    1. Conclusions:Indoctrinating a child to hate or fear a parent without a goodreason is a form of child psychological abuse. Clinicians should use theDSM-5diagnosis of child psychological abuse when an alienating parent is deter-mined to cause parental alienation in his or her children. Child protectionpersonnel should investigate cases of parental alienation as instances of childpsychological abuse

      75.4 PARENTAL ALIENATION: A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE William Bernet, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, william.bernet@vanderbilt.edu

      Conclusions: Indoctrinating a child to hate or fear a parent without a good reason is a form of child psychological abuse. Clinicians should use the DSM-5 diagnosis of child psychological abuse when an alienating parent is deter- mined to cause parental alienation in his or her children. Child protection personnel should investigate cases of parental alienation as instances of child psychological abuse. CAN, FAM, FCP http://dx.doi.org/l O. 1016/j.jaac.2017.07.439

    1. Effective residential treatment programs provide:

      What she could have received if she stayed at the QRTP (if Haylie knew the law; if DHS, Ramirez, Beato, McLean also knew and performed their job core competencies)

      Nikki Getz was the "qualified" brainchild to recommend depriving her of all this. I even have her recorded saying it is a serious issue that she has continued adamant contact refusal

    2. Involvement of the child's family or support system. Model residential programs encourage and provide opportunities for family therapy and contact

      Would have addressed the 1) family dysfunction need that brought DHS to be involved, 2) reasonable efforts for reunification 3)ffpsa mandate for family preservation, involvment, trauma-informed, 4) identified needs/wishes of family

    3. Psychiatric care coordinated by a child and adolescent psychiatrist or psychiatric prescriber.

      Could of had a Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist coordinating care, instead of a dipshit LCSW intern. And contribute to FFPSA mandate for trauma-informed, highest available science, evidence based

    4. An Individualized Treatment Plan that puts into place interventions that help the child or adolescent attain these goals.

      Could have finally had a treatment plan

    5. who have not responded to outpatient treatments

      The umm "plan" from Allison and Kim was Rhyanna see her therapist until she spontaneously decided to re-engage. Did the outpatient solution work? No. Did it get worse? Yes. She was put on an M1 hold. She is in QRTP for over a month and the argument was "she's doing so well [other than the enormous symptom of contact-refusal] has not improved at all] so, what your saying, should be taken out of the treatment that has shown improvement [i.e. QRTP], and take her out before the largest issue has been solved and put her into a "no treatment" facility? SERIOUSLY??

    1. Many services are not on the evidence-based list. That does notmean, however, that they have not been evaluated for effectiveness. The agency should be able toexplain to the court how it has evaluated the effectiveness of a particular service.
    1. 7.200.12 County Responsibilities [Rev. eff. 9/1/15]The county department shall be responsible:A. To deliver prevention and intervention services according to the state-approved service deliveryplan that is an addendum to the Core Services Plan.B. To ensure community agencies and/or other divisions within the county provide prevention andintervention services according to the state-approved service delivery plan.C. To ensure community agencies and/or other division within the county department refer families,youth, and children to the prevention and intervention service according to the contract with thecounty Child Welfare Division.D. To ensure community agencies and/or other divisions of human services offer prevention orintervention services according to the contract with the county department.E. To ensure documentation in the approved state automated case management system of thenames, age, ethnicity, gender, service provided, and the reason the service ended for families,youth, and children referred for or provided prevention and intervention services.F. To ensure documentation in the approved state automated case management system of allrequired data elements of each funding source used for prevention and intervention services.G. To follow the rules and requirements governing the specific funding stream the county elects touse to provide prevention and intervention services.H. To follow the rules and regulations promulgated by the State Board of Human Services
    2. Monthly ContactThe primary purpose for case contacts shall be to assure child safety and well-being and movethe case toward achieving identified treatment goals



    1. nform the parents of the reasons for stateintervention

      not providing me the allegations and getting a response violates reasonable efforts

    2. Reasonable Efforts: A Judicial Perspectiveby Judge Leonard Edwards (ret.)1

      Judge Edwards is a retired judge now working as a consultant to juvenile courts in California and other states. The author can be contacted by email: judgeleonardedwards@gmail.com or by visiting his webpage: judgeleonardedwards.com.

      - The author is indebted to many people for the research and information contained in this book. In particular, I thank Sidney Hollar, Esq. for her assistance with the text, Christopher Wu, Marymichael Miatovich, and Judge Arnold Rosenfield (ret.) for their suggestions regarding the text, Jackie Ruffin for her work on the footnotes, Dave Bressler for his technical assistance, and Anna Bokides for her assistance with research. Additionally, I thank all of the judges, attorneys, and CIP directors who commented on how the reasonable efforts issue is tried in their jurisdictions. Finally, I thank Casey Family Programs for their generous support in making the publication of this book possible. Judge Leonard Edwards (ret.)

    1. Neither affidavits nor subsequent “nunc protunc” orders are acceptable verification for meeting this “reasonable efforts” requirement.

      Cannot retroactively add to the orders or documentation to bolster the (false) fact that court diligently examined and found specific findings of reasonable efforts

    2. There must be an order of the court within sixty (60) calendar days after the date the childis placed in out-of-home care with a finding to the effect that:a. Reasonable efforts were made to prevent the removal of the child from the home
    3. County departments shall make reasonable efforts to advise county residents of servicesavailable through the state and county department by means of such methods as press releases,presentations, pamphlets, websites, social media and other mass media.

      I have seen no mention of "core services", "ffpsa", or any services afforded under them from Boulder County or on their website. Nor did Allison acknowledge them.

    4. 7.601 COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES [Eff. 1/1/15]There are basic information, legal mandates, and policies generic to the administration and/or provision ofservices that cut across all program and service areas. These include general administrativeresponsibilities, protection of clients' rights, responsibilities of clients, case processing anddocumentation, and reporting requirements. The county departments shall provide services to personswho are eligible and belong to the particular Program Area target groups within the following rules of theState Department
    1. 26The Counseling PsychologistTable 1.Criteria and Related Measures for Assessing ExpertiseCriteriaPossible ways of assessing criteria1.PerformanceA.Client-rated working allianceB.Client-rated real relationshipC.Observer-rated responsivenessD.Use of observer-rated theoretically appropriate interventionsE.Observer-rated competenceF.Client-rated multicultural competenceG.Observer-rated responsivenessH.Supervisor-rated competence or responsiveness2.Cognitive functioningA.Observer-rated assessment of cognitive processingB.Observer-rated assessment of case conceptualization ability3.Client outcomesA.Engagement in therapy (percentage of clients who return after intake)/dropout ratesB.Clinically significant change on reports by clients, therapists, significant others, or observers using measures of symptomatology, interpersonal functioning, quality of life/well-being, self-awareness/understanding/acceptance, satisfaction with workC.Behavioral assessments (e.g., fewer missed days of work, fewer doctor visits)4.ExperienceA.Years of experienceB.Number of client hoursC.Variety of clientsD.Amount of trainingE.Amount of supervisionF.Amount of reading5.Personal and relational qualities of the therapistA.Self-rated self-actualization, well-being, quality of life, lack of symptomatology, reflectivity, mindfulness, flexibilityB.Empathy ability (self-rated, nonverbal assessments, observer ratings)C.Nonverbal assessments of empathy6.CredentialsA.Graduation from an accredited training programB.Board certification7.ReputationA.Professional interactionsB.Advancement to positions of honor within organizations based on recognition of clinical expertiseC.Positive feedback and referrals from clientsD.Reports from colleagues/friendsE.Invitations to demonstrate methods in videos, workshops, or booksF.Lack of ethical complaints8.Therapist self-assessmentA.Evaluation of own skillsNote. The criteria are listed in the order of perceived relevance to assessing expertise, from 1 (most relevant) to 8 (least relevan

      Thoughts: So far it appears there is no law about who can diagnose. What there is is: - description of a rubric to grade a expert witness - general description that states cannot operate outside area if training and competence (but how to define that area is absent) - core services / FFPSA law mandating evidence based, trauma Informed, Clearinghouse designated, best available science, meet particular needs of family - law (or in draft) defining trauma Informed - licensing and professional associations standards and code of ethics regarding non black and white values and efforts mandates - there are laws that say if you can call yourself a doctor, therapist, etc, but non if them limit what they can or cannot do - therefore, legally, anyone can diagnose anyone with anything, including DSM codes, and you can take money for it...you just can't call yourself any of the protected titles

      So, when it comes to who is "legally qualified" or a "legally allowed expert", (which is just the expert, and not ultimately the credibility of the "evaluation/recommendation" it comes down to just who can provide a stronger argument that the expert in question is "more expert" than the other "expert". It's the exact same concept as scientific theory. You can't "prove" a scientific theory. You can only provide increasingly stronger (ultimately just means, whether for good reasons or bad, the emotion that something feels stronger or better) arguments that it is true. As in you can't prove "expertise" or that an eval is correct. However, you can "disprove" expertise or scientific theory.

      In psychotherapy there is an enormous gap of a system that gives a credible prediction of what a "provider" is likely to soundly be able to evaluate (and further a system for them to soundly know when and how to refer out). Perhaps some kind of "certifications needed" section for each DSM code.

      So what you can do is: - used the defined law and prof orgs law and ethics as rubrics (like a grading table), the table in this paper is a good one to incorporate, to make an argument of strongest expert. - you can also get more than one expert or experts from different areas which have all of them agreeing - strategy: also send evaluation off to credible authority to get their endorsement - strategy: do that memorandum thing (ABA guide how to influence judges) to advance submit law and argument to judge - all of this is the exact same issue, concept, and strategy to battle "reasonable efforts"

    1. When considering a request for removal, ask if the agency madereasonable efforts to prevent removal, which may include providingfederally supported prevention services.• If reasonable efforts have not been made, consider court orders forprevention services that may allow the child to remain safely at home.• Consider relevance of prevention services outside dependency &neglect context. Who else could benefit from prevention upstream?
    2. If reasonable efforts were not made, request a “no reasonable efforts”finding and an order returning the child to the family with appropriateservices.
    3. If the child is removed, request a copy of the family’s prevention plan (orother reflection of prevention services) to review what the agency offeredand whether reasonable efforts have been made to prevent removal
    4. Reasonable efforts to prevent removal: If a petition must be filed afterservices provided, prepare evidence of the prevention services offeredand used as an element of the agency’s reasonable efforts.
    1. There is a need to assess how poor and vulnerable families are oftenportrayed and perceived and to be mindful of how those portrayals or perceptions influence whattypes of resources are available, and to whom

      This doc is cited in ABA FFPSA legal guide, research to site to overcome reasonable efforts to reunify https://hyp.is/p-iA6tdvEe2Nz5fQQrBXwg/docdrop.org/download_annotation_doc/family-first-legal-guide-a8rhd.pdf

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Ad-ministration on Children, Youth and Families. ACYF-CB-IM-20-06, Foster Care as a Support to Families, April29, 2020.Provides examples of how agencies and courts can pro-vide meaningful efforts to reunify children and parentsand safely maintain that reunification, including usingresources families as an ongoing support.
    2. Edwards, Judge Leonard. “Overcoming Barriers toMaking Meaningful Reasonable Efforts Findings.” ABAChild Law Practice, January 29, 2019.Explains that it is not enough to make service referralsand note them in a case plan. Instead, “judges shoulddiscuss the availability and effectiveness of services pro-vided by service providers contracted by the agency,” and“frontline social workers should accurately assess familyneeds and report those needs to the court. Those needsshould form the foundation of the case plan.”
    3. Consider citing information on:Reasonable efforts to reunify

      ABA list of resources to cite to overcome lack of reunification

    4. When necessary, argue to the court that by not pro-viding a reunified child with appropriate services, the agency is not making mandated reasonable efforts to achieve permanency
    5. Providing states improved access to federal funds for reunification services aligns with the federal Children’s Bureau’s renewed focus on reasonable efforts to achieve permanency requirements. Families should be provided all needed assistance to ensure the safe reunification of the child. (See reasonable efforts resources in Research to Cite: Reunification Services for the Family.)

      Families should be provided all needed assistance to ensure the safe reunification of the child

    6. Judicial decision maker❑When reviewing a petition for removal, ask if the agen-cy made reasonable efforts to prevent removal, which may include providing federally supported prevention services. ƒInvite discussion and debate among parties about whether the reasonable efforts finding is appropri-ate. ƒIf reasonable efforts have not been made, consider court orders for prevention services that may allow the child to remain safely at home. ƒIf reasonable efforts have been made, be specific about what measures constituted reasonable efforts when making written findings in the case

      No documentation of specific prevention measures of reasonable efforts was done

    7. If the child is removed, request a copy of the family’s prevention plan to review what the agency offered and whether reasonable efforts have been made to prevent removal especially in cases involving mental health, substance use, and parenting skills challenges (if neces-sary, request the prevention plan through the discovery process)
    8. If the child is removed, request a copy of the family’s prevention plan to review what the agency offered and whether reasonable efforts have been made to prevent removal (if necessary, request through the discovery process). If reasonable efforts were not made, request a “no reasonable efforts” finding at the first hearing, and an order returning the child to the family with appro-priate services

      "request "no reasonable efforts" finding and order returning the child to family with appropriate services"

    1. The Core Services Program was established in 1994 to provide strength-based resources and support to families when children and youth are at imminent risk of out-of-home placement, in need of services to return home or to maintain a placement in the least restrictive setting possible.
    1. 19-3-100.5. Legislative declarations - reasonable efforts - movement of children and sibling groups.

      C.R.S. 19-3-100.5

  7. Feb 2023
  8. Jan 2023
    1. I'm still against frozen-string-literal by default. It is arguable if the string creation limits performance so much in real-world programs. We need to first measure how much Ruby can be faster by frozen-string-literal. If it is not significant, Ruby should prefer dynamics and flexibility.
  9. Nov 2022
  10. Sep 2022
    1. If we ever moved a file to a different location or renamed it, all its previous history is lost in git log, unless we specifically use git log --follow. I think usually, the expected behavior is that we'd like to see the past history too, not "cut off" after the rename or move, so is there a reason why git log doesn't default to using the --follow flag?
    1. Note: Git 2.6+ (Q3 2015) will propose that in command line: see "Why does git log not default to git log --follow?" Note: Git 2.6.0 has been released and includes this feature. Following path changes in the log command can be enabled by setting the log.follow config option to true as in: git config log.follow true
  11. Aug 2022
    1. New functionality is typically implemented with first class objects that import behavior from issues via shared concerns.

      How does this cause problems?

    1. Thus my docs recommendation of public function beforeFilter(Event $event) // do not render out the now inconsistent one for is(json) if (!$this->request->is('jsonapi')) { throw new NotFoundException('Invalid access, use application/vnd.api+json for Content-Type and Accept.'); } } to specifically only whitelist the desired jsonapi for the general use case.
    2. A default baked app has all those included. Thats why I am saying this - it is by default an issue we should and need to address :)
  12. Apr 2022
    1. You don’t need microsecond timing on a freaking website – except maybe in graphics and sound, and such functionality could be wrapped and secured in an API. So think that browser makers deserve a bigger slice of blame for making their users so vulnerable. User safety needs to become important again.
  13. Jun 2021
  14. May 2021
    1. Are you also tired and fed up with the bulkiness of jQuery, but also don't want to have to type document.querySelector("div").appendChild(document.createTextNode("hello")); just to add some text to an element?

      happy middle/medium?

  15. Apr 2021
    1. They cause completely different behavior for auto margins. If you have a fixed element for example with top/bottom/left/right set to zero and you stick an image in it you want to center wrapped in a div, then in order to center that div with auto margins, you MUST specify a CSS width/height, because specifying an HTML attribute width/height has no effect and the margins remain zero. I have no idea why the difference exists.
    2. Whether to specify in html or css is best judged on individual circumstances. A large number of images of the same size would probably be best served with css, a single image with html. That said, if you are specifying other styles for the image (border colour, style or radius, float etc) it would make sense to add width & height to the css.
  16. Mar 2021
    1. If you call ./configure --enable-gui=auto, the build process will automatically build against whichever GUI libraries are available. A cursory glance suggests that gtk2 will be prioritised over gnome2.
    1. Of course user expectations for titles are the most important thing. You don’t want to sell a tiny game at AAA price, because you won’t sell many copies and you’ll make your gamers feel ripped off.
  17. Feb 2021
    1. Record filters allow you to require an instance of a particular class (or one of its subclasses) or a value that can be used to locate an instance of the object. If the value does not match, it will call find on the class of the record. This is particularly useful when working with ActiveRecord objects.
  18. Jan 2021
    1. premailer-rails processes all outgoing emails by default. If you wish to skip premailer for a certain email, simply set the :skip_premailer header:
  19. Dec 2020
    1. I'd instinctively associate a this.cache() inside preload with the preloaded data only -- meaning no matter what crazy thing I did inside preload, the returned data would be cached locally, where local means either the client or server.
  20. Nov 2020
    1. logInfoToStdOut (boolean) (default=false) This is important if you read from stdout or stderr and for proper error handling. The default value ensures that you can read from stdout e.g. via pipes or you use webpack -j to generate json output.
    1. You will be disrupted by this first issue. It is natural to expect relative references to be resolved against the .sass/.scss file in which they are specified (like in regular .css files).
    1. We all know that real business logic does not belong in the presentation layer, but what about simple presentation-oriented things like coloring alternate rows in table or marking the selected option in a <select> dropdown? It seems equally wrong to ask the controller/business logic code to compute these down to simple booleans in order to reduce the logic in the presentation template. This route just lead to polluting the business layer code with presentation-oriented logic.
  21. Oct 2020
    1. Right, and if most uses of an FTP service use new FtpService() the one that sets an alternate port will stand out (service.SetPort(12345))
    2. The concept of Convention over Configuration is impossible without sensible default values. The key word here is "sensible". The default values have to make sense for at least 80% (if not more) of all the uses of a library/service/framework.
  22. Sep 2020
    1. What I believe should happen is the Svelte compiler should, when a promise is passed to onMount, realise that a promise has been passed, and await the result of the function to be used as the onDestroy function. i.e, it should behave the exact same way for an async function as it does for a non-async function (if this is possible)
    1. Also, I'm starting to wonder if maybe it's okay to have multiple spreads? If the alternative to <Foo {...a} {...b} {...c} d={42}> is that people will write <Foo {...Object.assign({}, a, b, c)} d={42}> anyway, then do we gain anything with the constraint?
    1. The fears of breaking one of Svelte's core tenets seem overblown to me. Style encapsulation by default is great, but that doesn't mean we should contort the framework around it.
  23. Jul 2020
    1. warn iff not seen before can be an acceptable option.
    2. So what Python currently does in issue depreciation warnings in the main program, but not in libraries and similar code. That may also be a reasonable way to limit the number of warnings while making sure deprecations don't go unnoticed (because that makes them useless).
  24. Jun 2020
    1. However, a ActiveRecord::Rollback within the nested transaction will be caught by the block of the nested transaction, but will be ignored by the outer transaction, and not cause a roll back! To avoid this unexpected behaviour, you have to explicitly tell rails for each transaction to indeed use proper nesting: CopyActiveRecord::Base.transaction(joinable: false, requires_new: true) do # inner code end This is a safer default for working with custom transactions.
  25. May 2020
    1. There will be limits placed on what will and will not be masked. This will include accounting for enough entropy to make sense (e.g. don't mask a variable that is just set to a word.) and are not multi-line.
    1. AFAICT the outcome you want is for your webRequest-added CSP header to be applied after document.write resets the page. This seems to me a reasonable thing to expect and I'm surprised it didn't work right away. Consider opening a ticket on crbug.com.
    1. The most controversial issue in RAND licensing is whether the "reasonable" license price should include the value contributed by the standard-setting organization's decision to adopt the standard. A technology is often more valuable after it has been widely adopted than when it is one alternative among many; there is a good argument that a license price that captures that additional value is not "reasonable" because it does not reflect the intrinsic value of the technology being licensed. On the other hand, the adoption of the standard may signal that the adopted technology is valuable, and the patent holder should be rewarded accordingly. That is particularly relevant when the value of the patent is not clearly known before the adoption of the standard.
  26. Apr 2020
    1. The court's decision, which exonerated Hush-A-Phone and prohibited further interference by AT&T toward Hush-A-Phone users, stated that AT&T's prohibition of the device was not "just, fair, and reasonable," as required under the Communications Act of 1934, as the device "does not physically impair any of the facilities of the telephone companies," nor did it "affect more than the conversation of the user."
  27. Mar 2020
    1. For all of the above reasons, this DPA is of the opinion that publishers may not be required to include, on the home page of their websites, also the notices relating to the cookies installed by third parties via the publishers’ websites.

      Glad to see that at least some DPAs are trying to use common sense and be reasonable.

    2. In general, the directive does not specifically require that you list and name individual third-party cookies, however, you are required to clearly state their categories and purpose. This decision by the Authority is likely deliberate as to require such would mean that individual website/app owners would bear the burden of constantly watching over every single third-party cookie, looking for changes that are outside of their control; this would be largely unreasonable, inefficient and likely unhelpful to users.
    1. If these asset owners regarded the “robots” as having the same status as guide dogs, blind people or default human citizens, they would undoubtedly stop imposing CAPTCHA tests and just offer APIs with reasonable limits applied.
  28. Oct 2019
    1. Setting up Nginx properly requires quite a bit of work. Using websockets or using Rails streaming? Make sure you disable response buffering for the relevant URIs, otherwise they won’t work correctly. Phusion Passenger 5’s builtin reverse proxy does the right thing by default, without any configuration. In other words: it’s all about making things simple.
    1. Yes, absolutely, no two projects are alike. This step is moving towards a direction where we have a set of best practices for webpack isolated in a bundled package and can be maintained in isolation without impacting upgrades or end-user experience. If you have seen next.js or create-react-app they sort of do they same thing for ease and maintainability. Rails is a great example for this - there are some built-in best practices, opinionated defaults and gems that are hidden behind the scene plus power to do advance things where needed.
  29. Aug 2019
    1. Let your reasonableness[d] be known to everyone.

      Everyone should aspire to have a reputation for . "reasonableness" or "gentleness" - both Christians, Jews, and Gentiles .