4,866 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
    1. We therefore the representatives of the united States of America in General Congress assebled [appealing to the Judge of the World for the recititude of our intentions] do in the name & by authority of the good people of these states [colonies] reject and renounce all allegiance & subjections to the kings of Great Britain & all others who may hereafter claim by, through or under them: we utterly disolve all political connection which may heretofore have subsisted between us & the people or parliment of Great Britain: and finally we do assert and declare these colonies to be free and independent states, [solemly Publish and Declare that these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, Free and Independent States; that they are dissolved from allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political Connection between them and the State of Great-Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved;] and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract allies, establish commerce, & do all other acts & things which independent states may of right do.

      I have always known about the Declaration of Independence, but through this class I have a new-found appreciation for it. One could easily look at this document and think of how important it was, but through this course I think I understand this document in a depth that most other people could not. I have studied how the Colonies began and how the Colonies and Great Britain began to gradually go apart. Nothing was sudden in this timeline. For the most part, everything slowly changed and all these changes finally lead to this Declaration. What better way to end this course than with the Declaration of Independence?

    1. Come, come, we are friends: let's have a dance erewe are married, that we may lighten our own heartsand our wives' heels.

      This comedy really highlights that idea of marriage being the end goal. After all the drama that Hero and Claudio went through, they still end up being married. I can understand Claudio's side, Hero ended up being innocent of the claims that Claudio made. He however, was guilty of that false accusation. Because of the Patriarchal society, Hero never really presses Claudio for his assumptions. Since marriage is the "goal," the affronts to Hero can be ignored. Two things came to mind this week when I was thinking about this. First, the idea that the ends justify the means. This may have been one of the most rocky journeys to getting married ever. Accusations of cheating, Hero "dying," and then Claudio being told he is marring a cousin. None of that mattered though because the end was marriage. Second, and just for a fun note. I think this song reflects the ideas of this play. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFPGkG1G8T0

      I don't care who you are Where you're from What you did As long as you love me

      Hero never questions Claudio despite his actions as long as he loved her. The reflection of the love being marriage. Because that's the goal, the path to get there is irrelevant.

    1. That Juries ought to be judges of law, as well as fact, should be clearly described; for though in some instances Juries may err, it is generally from tenderness, and on the right side. A man cannot be guilty of a good action, yet if the fact only is to be proved (which is Lord Mansfield’s doctrine) and the Jury not empowered to determine in their own minds, whether the fact proved to be done is a crime or not, a man may hereafter be found guilty of going to church or meeting.

      I think this is a crucially important concept with respect to this time period. Here we see this source speaking of the importance of a jury -- and we can connect this concept with the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776. And what does this author mean by "whether the fact be proved to be done is a crime or not, a man may hereafter be found guilty of going to church or a meeting?" What are the broader implications of this concept of a jury and how it was suppose to operate? Has it changed in today's era?

    1. If scientific reasoning were limited to the logical processes of arithmetic, we should not get far in our understanding of the physical world. One might as well attempt to grasp the game of poker entirely by the use of the mathematics of probability.

      Interesting to note the boom in poker coincides with a more data-driven approach to general society.

    1. What we generally see in the news media is that if there is global warming, and it makes sense at first blush, well you’re going to see ice melt and you’re going to see the sea levels rise, so we are going to have all sorts of damage to our coastal areas as a consequence. But while I was here in Antarctica, I met with a number of National Science Foundations that all contended that there was some degree of global warming but they added that if there was a slight or modest global warming that the sea levels would fall not rise. Let me emphasize that: that the sea levels if there is slight or modest global warming will fall not rise.” “First that the principal amount of ice on the planet is here in Antarctica. Roughly 85% more or less of the total amount of ice on the planet. Second that if the temperatures rise a little bit, it is going to carry more moisture which in Antarctica is going to be deposited over huge land mass that is larger than the size of the United States of America, by way of examples some level of ice I think that the mean is around 6000 feet deep, South Pole is more than that and some some places there in Antarctica it’s as much as 3 miles thick and that it takes hundred of years for that ice that is fallen in Antarctica to actually reach the coast line. Which means that if temperatures goes up a little bit because of this effect you are actually looking at more snow and ice being deposited on in Antarctica and water being taken from the oceans more than offsetting whatever melt there may be in Greenland or the Arctic. So what are your thoughts on that theory or argument that they were raising to us in Antarctica?

      This summary is not correct. The data clearly show that even with the amount of global warming that we have already experienced, that the global mean sea level has risen. The amount of snowfall over Antarctica is not enough to balance this effect of the seas rising, which itself is a function of seawater expanding as it heats up as well as the addition of meltwater from mountain glaciers and polar ice sheets (IPCC, AR5).

    1. The central tension between disintegration and integration is not a binary opposition; in the emerging digital ecosystem, they can be deeply interconnected.

      Perhaps the connections are not between "disintegration and integration" so much as they are between "localized and distributed," two ways of approaching meaning-making. I need to think about this some more. Using the word "distributed" may help us understand what we don't understand--i.e., networks of participatory cultures, the power of learner-centered linking and aggregation, etc.

    Tags

    Annotators

    1. humans must experience and better understand their profound interdependence with the planet

      When humans do not interact directly with the natural world it is hard to know that we completely depend on it to live. For instance, when we buy food at the supermarket, we may not think about where that food was grown, how long it took to grow, and what kind of soil and weather conditions were required. We may not think about how drought and changes in climate are likely to change the food that is available to us. A direct experience with nature such as caring for some food plants helps us understand how long it takes and how challenging it is to grow what we need to eat.

    1. we may have to think hard about how online speech can be free – including free as in beer (provided without a monetary cost) or as in kittens (requiring ongoing care)

      Again, I have difficulty with the underlying naivete of this article. There isn't anything that is truly free, especially not "free" beer or "free" kittens (or cute animals of any sort) or free news or free media. Somebody pays for it, one way or another. That "free" beer usually comes with a price tag: cover or door charge (minimum menu purchase); that "free" kitten requires food, care, vet bills, etc. I suggest that we start with defining exactly what we mean by "free" online speech and for what purpose(s) we want to support it and how much it will actually cost in terms of funding (hosting servers), managing (controlling/tracking/indexing) the posts (and archives), and to whom the participants are accountable.

    1. If students are living their lives in preparation for life, when will they start living? When do rules and regulations pay off? The answer is never. If students aren’t free to be curious, engaged, and invested in what they’re learning, then they may never be curious, engaged, or invested in their lives. Education is about more than passing a test or being accepted to the “right” school, it’s about self-discovery and personal growth as an individual

      This is something I can get on board with, students should be able to choose what they learn, instead of being spoon fed what others think they should learn. The thing I would like to add though is that students should be able to choose how they learn as well. I find that in my experience homework and the classroom has not benefited me to the slightest. I learn much better while actually doing things, making mistakes and learning from them, I learn best while I teach myself. I find that homework and classes which are both things I do not want to do yet pay my life away for have become obsolete in educating me.

    1. There was a pause, during which Sasha was keenly aware of Coz behind her, waiting. She wanted badly to please him, to say something like It was a turning point; everything feels different now, or I called Lizzie and we made up, finally, or I’ve picked up the harp again, or just, I’m changing, I’m changing, I’m changing. I’ve changed! Redemption, transformation—God, how she wanted these things. Every day, every minute. Didn’t everyone?

      Sasha states how she knows exactly what her therapist Coz wanted her to say, and what she could have said to get out of this awkward conversation, however, she doesn't. I think this paragraph speaks a lot about Sasha's determination to get better and terminate her theft addiction, as her honesty shines through. She knew exactly what to say to make Coz think she was making progress, however, she didn't. The fact that the opportunity was right in front of her but she did not take it shows that Sasha truly cares about fixing her problem. She understands that you have to put in the effort to get what you want and may have to do things you don't want to in order to reach achievement.

    1. She did not think much of the story; it was Martin’s intensity of power, the old excess of strength that seemed to pour from his body and on and over her.  The paradox of it was that it was the story itself that was freighted with his power, that was the channel, for the time being, through which his strength poured out to her.

      This scene is a nod to a previous scene in chapter 1 when a similar thing happens and Ruth is enveloped by the aura of Martin's character. She was drawn in by his strength and scar and even made mention of how his neck radiated vitality and made her want to grab it. This sense of portraying the working class as "bestial" is a recurring theme throughout the novel while the middle class is portrayed as angelic. In the scene in chapter 1, Ruth perhaps wanted to grab his neck in order to gain some of his vitality as she said, or perhaps she could feel the innate danger of the middle class man before him. In this scene we see the strength of Martin's resolve, having tutored himself to this point and having started writing. Ruth is taken aback by the amount of "work" Martin is putting in. His bestial ability to take action and forge ahead is a foil to Ruth's angelic concept of judging from above him. The reason I believe Ruth is most attracted to Martin is that he is the only character in the novel who possesses the will to better himself. Throughout the novel and in real life as well, we get a cast of characters who are content with the class they've been dealt and their position within that class. However, Martin's ability to change himself is uncanny, almost to the point where I believe Ruth may be ultimately jealous. Jealous not only because she does not strive to better herself(as she studies not to make something of herself, but for leisure), but also for the fact that the working class hero may surpass her soon enough.

    1. because that proof is missing Rossi should somehow be given the benefit of the doubt.

      Given the benefit for what purpose? This is not a criminal trial. However, many are interested only in the excess heat question. Because Rossi has shown that he lies, and because he has shown that he somehow induces scientists -- even established skeptics like Essen -- to make face-palm errors, nothing from Rossi or generated in a zone of high Rossi influence, can be trusted. It's "fake news." And the people who cling to fake news are people who already "know" what it appears to confirm.

      If the Rossi Effect is real, Rossi will, I'd think, show someone his secrets, fully. If he cannot find anyone to trust, then the outcome is Natural Consequences. Paranoia strikes deep.

      Rossi's health may be failing, there are signs in the depositions. I understand why people like Rossi. I feel some substantial sympathy for him, in spite of all that he has done (and in spite of his calling me a paid puppet of IH). If he has a real effect, and if he actually cares about those children with cancer, and about the rest of us and our future, I strongly hope he will make that disclosure, and take steps to insure that the transferred technology actually works. He always said, the proof is in the market, and he was right as to an ultimate proof. So if people want to support him, if they believe him or in him, then .... let them raise the funds and make it so. Nothing could stop them.

      But we now see that Rossi had full opportunity to do this with IH, to make $100 million and then half the world market, which would be many, many billions, and he blew it, badly. Conclusions are obvious, though many details may remain obscure.

    1. Mnemotechnical Infrastructure

      What a fabulous project, Jared! I think your concept of mnemotechnic infrastructure (MTI, if I may) is remarkably generative for scrutinizing our current knowledge making tools and practices, as well carefully thinking through why and how we might change them, and what the cost of such changes might be. Personally, I’d love to see this concept taken up in broader scholarly communication discussions, as I think their focus on tools, policies, and practices would benefit profusely from theoretical concepts such as the one you offer here. In turn, I would hope a more theoretically-engaged scholarly communication discourse community would attract more attention and contributions from traditional scholars who (currently) prefer their tools, practices, and knowledge systems to remain invisible while they chase their IDEAS! Not that I blame them, but the MTI that I’m personally rooting for is one developed by as many disciplinary and critical perspectives as possible, and it will take work to convince some folks that their contributions to this discussion matter. IMHO scholars need to understand--or dare I say, feel--the intellectual and social stakes of this work if they are to see it as anything other than service labor imperiling their precious time to produce knowledge.

      So, given that I want your ideas here to circulate as widely as possible, I have a few suggestions for a future iteration of this piece. First, I would define MTI right off the bat, and more immediately describe /why/ this concept is helpful. You may have defined it in one of your other pieces on this site, but given the title of this piece, I as a web reader am hoping for a definition here. I would do the same with your use of the concept “thematize,” which while also a very useful concept for describing the work of scholars, may not necessarily be the way all scholars describe their work, especially those “problematizing” ones :). Can you specify more directly why thematizing is the way in which we should think of the core activity of (textual?) scholarship, and how then this conceptualization is important for better evaluating and developing our MTI? I ask not to push against the possibility, but because I genuinely want to know your answer!

      Another note on the form: in paragraph two, the reader becomes aware that this piece is part of a series of chapters, but it is not immediately clear where to find those chapters (I’m assuming under the MTI nav tab), especially given that this piece is listed as the introduction and the sentence refers to two “previous chapters.” I’d love to see a sidebar or even a simple italicized introductory sentence that quickly outlines the objective and trajectory of the project such as something along the lines of (but better than) “This is part 1 of a series on Mnemotechnical Infrastructure, in which I will describe the importance of MTI and analyze some of its emerging tools and practices.”

      While on one hand these sorts of changes may impede on the stimulating economy of your writing, I think it might also help bring more readers to your really wonderful ideas. Regardless, however, I found this piece very generative, and am looking forward to engaging with more of your ideas here on this site and elsewhere. Thanks for generously offering your ideas to the public! More detailed notes below.

  2. Mar 2017
  3. literaryanalysisscsu.wordpress.com literaryanalysisscsu.wordpress.com
    1. Herman Melville “The Bell-Tower” (1855) In the south of Europe, nigh a once frescoed capital, now with dank mold cankering its bloom, central in a plain, stands what, at distance, seems the black mossed stump of some immeasurable pine, fallen, in forgotten days, with Anak and the Titan. As all along where the pine tree falls, its dissolution leaves a mossy mound — last-flung shadow of the perished trunk; never lengthening, never lessening; unsubject to the fleet falsities of the sun; shade immutable, and true gauge which cometh by prostration — so westward from what seems the stump, one steadfast spear of lichened ruin veins the plain. From that treetop, what birded chimes of silver throats had rung. A stone pine, a metallic aviary in its crown: the Bell-Tower, built by the great mechanician, the unblest foundling, Bannadonna. Like Babel’s, its base was laid in a high hour of renovated earth, following the second deluge, when the waters of the Dark Ages had dried up and once more the green appeared. No wonder that, after so long and deep submersion, the jubilant expectation of the race should, as with Noah’s sons, soar into Shinar aspiration. In firm resolve, no man in Europe at that period went beyond Bannadonna. Enriched through commerce with the Levant, the state in which he lived voted to have the noblest Bell-Tower in Italy. His repute assigned him to be architect. Stone by stone, month by month, the tower rose. Higher, higher, snaillike in pace, but torch or rocket in its pride. After the masons would depart, the builder, standing alone upon its ever-ascending summit at close of every day, saw that he overtopped still higher walls and trees. He would tarry till a late hour there, wrapped in schemes of other and still loftier piles. Those who of saints’ days thronged the spot — hanging to the rude poles of scaffolding like sailors on yards or bees on boughs, unmindful of lime and dust, and falling chips of stone — their homage not the less inspirited him to self-esteem. At length the holiday of the Tower came. To the sound of viols, the climax-stone slowly rose in air, and, amid the firing of ordnance, was laid by Bannadonna’s hands upon the final course. Then mounting it, he stood erect, alone, with folded arms, gazing upon the white summits of blue inland Alps, and whiter crests of bluer Alps offshore — sights invisible from the plain. Invisible, too, from thence was that eye he turned below, when, like the cannon booms, came up to him the people’s combustions of applause. That which stirred them so was seeing with what serenity the builder stood three hundred feet in air, upon an unrailed perch. This none but he durst do. But his periodic standing upon the pile, in each stage of its growth — such discipline had its last result. Little remained now but the bells. These, in all respects, must correspond with their receptacle. The minor ones were prosperously cast. A highly enriched one followed, of a singular make, intended for suspension in a manner before unknown. The purpose of this bell, its rotary motion and connection with the clockwork, also executed at the time, will, in the sequel, receive mention. In the one erection, bell-tower and clock-tower were united, though, before that period, such structures had commonly been built distinct; as the Campanile and Torre del Orologio of St. Mark to this day attest. But it was upon the great state bell that the founder lavished his more daring skill. In vain did some of the less elated magistrates here caution him, saying that though truly the tower was titanic, yet limit should be set to the dependent weight of its swaying masses. But, undeterred, he prepared his mammoth mold, dented with mythological devices; kindled his fires of balsamic firs; melted his tin and copper, and, throwing in much plate contributed by the public spirit of the nobles, let loose the tide. The unleashed metals bayed like hounds. The workmen shrunk. Through their fright, fatal harm to the bell was dreaded. Fearless as Shadrach, Bannadonna, rushing through the glow, smote the chief culprit with his ponderous ladle. From the smitten part, a splinter was dashed into the seething mass, and at once was melted in. Next day a portion of the work was heedfully uncovered. All seemed right. Upon the third morning, with equal satisfaction, it was bared still lower. At length, like some old Theban king, the whole cooled casting was disinterred. All was fair except in one strange spot. But as he suffered no one to attend him in these inspections, he concealed the blemish by some preparation which none knew better to devise. The casting of such a mass was deemed no small triumph for the caster; one, too, in which the state might not scorn to share. The homicide was overlooked. By the charitable that deed was but imputed to sudden transports of esthetic passion, not to any flagitious quality. A kick from an Arabian charger; not sign of vice, but blood. His felony remitted by the judge, absolution given him by the priest, what more could even a sickly conscience have desired. Honoring the tower and its builder with another holiday, the republic witnessed the hoisting of the bells and clockwork amid shows and pomps superior to the former. Some months of more than usual solitude on Bannadonna’s part ensued. It was not unknown that he was engaged upon something for the belfry, intended to complete it and surpass all that had gone before. Most people imagined that the design would involve a casting like the bells. But those who thought they had some further insight would shake their heads, with hints that not for nothing did the mechanician keep so secret. Meantime, his seclusion failed not to invest his work with more or less of that sort of mystery pertaining to the forbidden. Erelong he had a heavy object hoisted to the belfry, wrapped in a dark sack or cloak — a procedure sometimes had in the case of an elaborate piece of sculpture, or statue, which, being intended to grace the front of a new edifice, the architect does not desire exposed to critical eyes till set up, finished, in its appointed place. Such was the impression now. But, as the object rose, a statuary present observed, or thought he did, that it was not entirely rigid, but was, in a manner, pliant. At last, when the hidden thing had attained its final height, and, obscurely seen from below, seemed almost of itself to step into the belfry, as if with little assistance from the crane, a shrewd old blacksmith present ventured the suspicion that it was but a living man. This surmise was thought a foolish one, while the general interest failed not to augment. Not without demur from Bannadonna, the chief magistrate of the town, with an associate — both elderly men — followed what seemed the image up the tower. But, arrived at the belfry, they had little recompense. Plausibly entrenching himself behind the conceded mysteries of his art, the mechanician withheld present explanation. The magistrates glanced toward the cloaked object, which, to their surprise, seemed now to have changed its attitude, or else had before been more perplexingly concealed by the violent muffling action of the wind without. It seemed now seated upon some sort of frame, or chair, contained within the domino. They observed that nigh the top, in a sort of square, the web of the cloth, either from accident or design, had its warp partly withdrawn, and the cross threads plucked out here and there, so as to form a sort of woven grating. Whether it were the low wind or no, stealing through the stone latticework, or only their own perturbed imaginations, is uncertain, but they thought they discerned a slight sort of fitful, springlike motion in the domino. Nothing, however incidental or insignificant, escaped their uneasy eyes. Among other things, they pried out, in a corner, an earthen cup, partly corroded and partly encrusted, and one whispered to the other that this cup was just such a one as might, in mockery, be offered to the lips of some brazen statue, or, perhaps, still worse. But, being questioned, the mechanician said that the cup was simply used in his founder’s business, and described the purpose — in short, a cup to test the condition of metals in fusion. He added that it had got into the belfry by the merest chance. Again and again they gazed at the domino, as at some suspicious incognito at a Venetian mask. All sorts of vague apprehensions stirred them. They even dreaded lest, when they should descend, the mechanician, though without a flesh-and-blood companion, for all that, would not be left alone. Affecting some merriment at their disquietude, he begged to relieve them, by extending a coarse sheet of workman’s canvas between them and the object. Meantime he sought to interest them in his other work, nor, now that the domino was out of sight, did they long remain insensible to the artistic wonders lying round them — wonders hitherto beheld but in their unfinished state, because, since hoisting the bells, none but the caster had entered within the belfry. It was one trait of his, that, even in details, he would not let another do what he could, without too great loss of time, accomplish for himself. So, for several preceding weeks, whatever hours were unemployed in his secret design had been devoted to elaborating the figures on the bells. The clock bell, in particular, now drew attention. Under a patient chisel, the latent beauty of its enrichments, before obscured by the cloudings incident to casting, that beauty in its shyest grace, was now revealed. Round and round the bell, twelve figures of gay girls, garlanded, hand-in-hand, danced in a choral ring the embodied hours. “Bannadonna,” said the chief, “this bell excels all else. No added touch could here improve. Hark!” hearing a sound, “was that the wind?” “The wind, Excellenza,” was the light response. “But the figures, they are not yet without their faults. They need some touches yet. When those are given, and the — block yonder,” pointing towards the canvas screen, “when Haman there, as I merrily call him — him? it, I mean — when Haman is fixed on this, his lofty tree, then, gentlemen, will I be most happy to receive you here again.” The equivocal reference to the object caused some return of restlessness. However, on their part, the visitors forbore further allusion to it, unwilling, perhaps, to let the foundling see how easily it lay within his plebeian art to stir the placid dignity of nobles. “Well, Bannadonna,” said the chief, “how long ere you are ready to set the clock going, so that the hour shall be sounded? Our interest in you, not less than in the work itself, makes us anxious to be assured of your success. The people, too — why, they are shouting now. say the exact hour when you will be ready.” “Tomorrow, Excellenza, if you listen for it — or should you not, all the same — strange music will be heard. The stroke of one shall be the first from yonder bell,” pointing to the bell adorned with girls and garlands, “that stroke shall fall there, where the hand of Una clasps Dua’s. The stroke of one shall sever that loved clasp. Tomorrow, then, at one o’clock, as struck here, precisely here,” advancing and placing his finger upon the clasp, “the poor mechanic will be most happy once more to give you liege audience, in this his littered shop. Farewell till then, illustrious magnificoes, and hark ye for your vassal’s stroke.” His still, Vulcanic face hiding its burning brightness like a forge, he moved with ostentatious deference towards the scuttle, as if so far to escort their exit. But the junior magistrate, a kind-hearted man, troubled at what seemed to him a certain sardonical disdain lurking beneath the foundling’s humble mien, and in Christian sympathy more distressed at it on his account than on his own, dimly surmising what might be the final fate of such a cynic solitaire, nor perhaps uninfluenced by the general strangeness of surrounding things, this good magistrate had glanced sadly, sideways from the speaker, and thereupon his foreboding eye had started at the expression of the unchanging face of the Hour Una. “How is this, Bannadonna,” he lowly asked, “Una looks unlike her sisters.” “In Christ’s name, Bannadonna,” impulsively broke in the chief, his attention for the first attracted to the figure by his associate’s remark. “Una’s face looks just like that of Deborah, the prophetess, as painted by the Florentine, Del Fonca.” “Surely, Bannadonna,” lowly resumed the milder magistrate, “you meant the twelve should wear the same jocundly abandoned air. But see, the smile of Una seems but a fatal one. ‘Tis different.” While his mild associate was speaking, the chief glanced inquiringly from him to the caster, as if anxious to mark how the discrepancy would be accounted for. As the chief stood, his advanced foot was on the scuttle’s curb. Bannadonna spoke: “Excellenza, now that, following your keener eye, I glance upon the face of Una, I do, indeed perceive some little variance. But look all round the bell, and you will find no two faces entirely correspond. Because there is a law in art — but the cold wind is rising more; these lattices are but a poor defense. Suffer me, magnificoes, to conduct you at least partly on your way. Those in whose well-being there is a public stake, should be heedfully attended.” “Touching the look of Una, you were saying, Bannadonna, that there was a certain law in art,” observed the chief, as the three now descended the stone shaft, “pray, tell me, then –” “Pardon; another time, Excellenza — the tower is damp.” “Nay, I must rest, and hear it now. Here, — here is a wide landing, and through this leeward slit, no wind, but ample light. Tell us of your law, and at large.” “Since, Excellenza, you insist, know that there is a law in art which bars the possibility of duplicates. Some years ago, you may remember, I graved a small seal for your republic, bearing, for its chief device, the head of your own ancestor, its illustrious founder. It becoming necessary, for the customs’ use, to have innumerable impressions for bales and boxes, I graved an entire plate, containing one hundred of the seals. Now, though, indeed, my object was to have those hundred heads identical, and though, I dare say, people think them so, yet, upon closely scanning an uncut impression from the plate, no two of those five-score faces, side by side, will be found alike. Gravity is the air of all, but diversified in all. In some, benevolent; in some, ambiguous; in two or three, to a close scrutiny, all but incipiently malign, the variation of less than a hair’s breadth in the linear shadings round the mouth sufficing to all this. Now, Excellenza, transmute that general gravity into joyousness, and subject it to twelve of those variations I have described, and tell me, will you not have my hours here, and Una one of them? But I like –” “Hark! is that — a footfall above?” “Mortar, Excellenza; sometimes it drops to the belfry floor from the arch where the stonework was left undressed. I must have it seen to. As I was about to say: for one, I like this law forbidding duplicates. It evokes fine personalities. Yes, Excellenza, that strange, and — to you — uncertain smile, and those forelooking eyes of Una, suit Bannadonna very well.” “Hark! — sure we left no soul above?” “No soul, Excellenza, rest assured, no soul. — Again the mortar.” “It fell not while we were there.” “Ah, in your presence, it better knew its place, Excellenza,” blandly bowed Bannadonna. “But Una,” said the milder magistrate, “she seemed intently gazing on you; one would have almost sworn that she picked you out from among us three.” “If she did, possibly it might have been her finer apprehension, Excellenza.” “How, Bannadonna? I do not understand you.” “No consequence, no consequence, Excellenza — but the shifted wind is blowing through the slit. Suffer me to escort you on, and then, pardon, but the toiler must to his tools.” “It may be foolish, signor,” and the milder magistrate, as, from the third landing, the two now went down unescorted, “but, somehow, our great mechanician moves me strangely. Why, just now, when he so superciliously replied, his walk seemed Sisera’s, God’s vain foe, in Del Fonca’s painting. And that young, sculptured Deborah, too. Aye, and that –” “Tush, tush, signor!” returned the chief. “A passing whim. Deborah? — Where’s Jael, pray?” “Ah,” said the other, as they now stepped upon the sod, “ah, signor, I see you leave your fears behind you with the chill and gloom; but mine, even in this sunny air, remain. Hark!” It was a sound from just within the tower door, whence they had emerged. Turning, they saw it closed. “He has slipped down and barred us out,” smiled the chief; “but it is his custom.” Proclamation was now made that the next day, at one hour after meridian, the clock would strike, and — thanks to the mechanician’s powerful art — with unusual accompaniments. But what those should be, none as yet could say. The announcement was received with cheers. By the looser sort, who encamped about the tower all night, lights were seen gleaming through the topmost blindwork, only disappearing with the morning sun. Strange sounds, too, were heard, or were thought to be, by those whom anxious watching might not have left mentally undisturbed — sounds, not only of some ringing implement, but also, so they said, half-suppressed screams and plainings, such as might have issued from some ghostly engine overplied. Slowly the day drew on, part of the concourse chasing the weary time with songs and games, till, at last, the great blurred sun rolled, like a football, against the plain. At noon, the nobility and principal citizens came from the town in cavalcade, a guard of soldiers, also, with music, the more to honor the occasion. Only one hour more. Impatience grew. Watches were held in hands of feverish men, who stood, now scrutinizing their small dial-plates, and then, with neck thrown back, gazing toward the belfry as if the eve might foretell that which could only be made sensible to the ear, for, as yet, there was no dial to the tower clock. The hour hands of a thousand watches now verged within a hair’s breadth of the figure 1. A silence, as of the expectations of some Shiloh, pervaded the swarming plain. Suddenly a dull, mangled sound, naught ringing in it, scarcely audible, indeed, to the outer circles of the people — that dull sound dropped heavily from the belfry. At the same moment, each man stared at his neighbor blankly. All watches were upheld. All hour hands were at — had passed — the figure 1. No bell stroke from the tower. The multitude became tumultuous. Waiting a few moments, the chief magistrate, commanding silence, hailed the belfry to know what thing unforeseen had happened there. No response. He hailed again and yet again. All continued hushed. By his order, the soldiers burst in the tower door, when, stationing guards to defend it from the now surging mob, the chief, accompanied by his former associate, climbed the winding stairs. Halfway up, they stopped to listen. No sound. Mounting faster, they reached the belfry, but, at the threshold, started at the spectacle disclosed. A spaniel, which, unbeknown to them, had followed them thus far, stood shivering as before some unknown monster in a brake, or, rather, as if it snuffed footsteps leading to some other world. Bannadonna lay, prostrate and bleeding, at the base of the bell which was adorned with girls and garlands. He lay at the feet of the hour Una, his head coinciding, in a vertical line, with her left hand, clasped by the hour Dua. With downcast face impending over him, like Jael over nailed Sisera in the tent, was the domino; now no more becloaked. It had limbs, and seemed clad in a scaly mail, lustrous as a dragon-beetle’s. It was manacled, and its clubbed arms were uplifted, as if, with its manacles, once more to smite its already smitten victim. One advanced foot of it was inserted beneath the dead body, as if in the act of spurning it. Uncertainty falls on what now followed. It were but natural to suppose that the magistrates would, at first, shrink from immediate personal contact with what they saw. At the least, for a time, they would stand in involuntary doubt, it may be, in more or less horrified alarm. Certain it is that an arquebuss was called for from below. And some add that its report, followed by a fierce whiz, as of the sudden snapping of a mainspring, with a steely din, as if a stack of sword blades should be dashed upon a pavement; these blended sounds came ringing to the plain, attracting every eye far upward to the belfry, whence, through the latticework, thin wreaths of smoke were curling. Some averred that it was the spaniel, gone mad by fear, which was shot. This, others denied. True it was, the spaniel never more was seen; and, probably for some unknown reason, it shared the burial now to be related of the domino. For, whatever the preceding circumstances may have been, the first instinctive panic over, or else all ground of reasonable fear removed, the two magistrates, by themselves, quickly re-hooded the figure in the dropped cloak wherein it had been hoisted. The same night, it was secretly lowered to the ground, smuggled to the beach, pulled far out to sea, and sunk. Nor to any after urgency, even in free convivial hours, would the twain ever disclose the full secrets of the belfry. From the mystery unavoidably investing it, the popular solution of the foundling’s fate involved more or less of supernatural agency. But some few less unscientific minds pretended to find little difficulty in otherwise accounting for it. In the chain of circumstantial inferences drawn, there may or may not have been some absent or defective links. But, as the explanation in question is the only one which tradition has explicitly preserved, in dearth of better, it will here be given. But, in the first place, it is requisite to present the supposition entertained as to the entire motive and mode, with their origin, of the secret design of Bannadonna, the minds above-mentioned assuming to penetrate as well into his soul as into the event. The disclosure will indirectly involve reference to peculiar matters, none of the clearest, beyond the immediate subject. At that period, no large bell was made to sound otherwise than as at present, by agitation of a tongue within by means of ropes, or percussion from without, either from cumbrous machinery, or stalwart watchmen, armed with heavy hammers, stationed in the belfry or in sentry boxes on the open roof, according as the bell was sheltered or exposed. It was from observing these exposed bells, with their watchmen, that the foundling, as was opined, derived the first suggestion of his scheme. Perched on a great mast or spire, the human figure, viewed from below, undergoes such a reduction in its apparent size as to obliterate its intelligent features. It evinces no personality. Instead of bespeaking volition, its gestures rather resemble the automatic ones of the arms of a telegraph. Musing, therefore, upon the purely Punchinello aspect of the human figure thus beheld, it had indirectly occurred to Bannadonna to devise some metallic agent which should strike the hour with its mechanic hand, with even greater precision than the vital one. And, moreover, as the vital watchman on the roof, sallying from his retreat at the given periods, walked to the bell with uplifted mace to smite it, Bannadonna had resolved that his invention should likewise possess the power of locomotion, and, along with that, the appearance, at least, of intelligence and will.

      His invention will be his downfall!

    1. However, I think Black’s negativeclaim is mistaken: a literal paraphrase need not ignore thesestructural relations. Our language may not contain manycommon, convenient devices for making them explicit, but itis well within our capabilities to represent them. I did justthat with Romeo’s metaphor, albeit in rather laborious terms,in order to motivate the intuition that therewassuch a struc-ture. We can also, more perspicuously, supplement our lan-guage with formal representational systems such as numericalweightings or maps, as I’ve done in Figure 1.

      Passage 4

    1. interdisciplinary studies is proven to broaden our intellectual horizons, therefore we must fund this type of education!

      I think funding as well as more awareness is key for the future of IDS. I had never heard of IDS until I left the nursing program last May. I had no idea this wonderful world existed and that makes me sad! This is such a wonderful program and more people need to know about what it has to offer!

  4. spinmelikearecord.wordpress.com spinmelikearecord.wordpress.com
    1. Secondly, being able to think abstractly, is very significant to me. It is so important to have different ideas that may even seem impossible

      This so true for me too. Sometimes we get lost in thinking inside the box, sticking to a strict discipline schedule of learning; we lose the ability to be creative and think outside of the box. Thinking abstractly is as important as thinking critically. The two go hand in hand.

    1. But, to speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it.

      I think that overall Thoreau makes a valid point. there have been may cases where the government hasn't let the public know what they are doing to "keep us safe"; and they never really ask the public what we need. I think that if the government did this it would be for the better in my opinion.

    2. I know that most men think differently from myself; but those whose lives are by profession devoted to the study of these or kindred subjects content me as little as any.

      I could be wrong, as I am slightly confused by this. However it almost gives this feel as if he is talking down onto others. He is suggesting that others have different views and that is okay, however he then goes on to imply that his are correct, simply becuase of his profession. This is incrediably ignorant, and while I totally understand his point, he may be failing to realize that he lives in a democratic republic, and if everyone just stops paying their highway tax, the funding for the military will stop. While that might make this man feel good in the moment, as one war stops, what happens next is well above this mans research. He has no evidence or reports suggesting that if we did not have a strong, vibrant military, that the masses of America would be safe and protected. There is however evidence everyday, that American's do not see, inteligence reports, and military attacks, happening everyday, that is funded by tax payers and more importantly, real attacks on American soil are stopped this way.

    1. Zadie Smith, “MEET THE PRESIDENT!” New Yorker, Aug. 12 & 19, 2003.

      The .PDF on blackboard includes a cover picture for "Meet The President". We can learn a great deal about how the local and the elites are portrayed in this story form the cover.

      First, you may notice the girl in the back. This is Aggie. In the story there is a scene where Aggie and Bill are walking to her sisters 'laying out'. Aggie is dressed in this Puritan, 1600's, style attire. Not very high end; her people, the locals, obviously do not have a lot of money. But I think the most important thing to notice is, she is human.

      Bill on the other hand is shown as an abstract/intangible person. No physical features other than his outline. He's walking on water. He's not being portrayed as human, or maybe not as human as Aggie.

    1. The eye of the reformer is met with angry flashes, portending disastrous times; but his heart may well beat lighter at the thought that America is young, and that she is still in the impressible stage of her existence.

      Douglass writes this line as a sign of hope. The people who hope for change may be angry with the current state they are in and give warnings to many through their acts and even writings like Douglass' but many think that all is lost since there is no change. Douglass says that you all have hope, there is a small fire within you knowing that America has a long way to go, and can still pick up new ideas with time. Nothing is set in stone yet, we can make a brighter future such as abolishing slavery.

    1. What are the risks in assuming that we start from a place of shared values and goals?

      Having worked myself in all the roles Joshua talks about here, I'll start out by agreeing with his main point: a lot of people in forprofit edtech are great folks and are personally motivated by many of the same things as educators. Yet I hope this isn't really the issue: I think humans share a lot of values regardless of who they work for. I locate the primary friction between EDU and forprofit edtech at a structural level: education as a public good and forprofit companies motivated primarily by revenue are not naturally aligned, regardless of how well-aligned people on all sides may be. What we need most is not to put more trust and faith in people working in forprofit edtech (we should have some already), but to work for models to develop and provide edtech that are fully aligned with the public good interests of education.

    1. All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it, a playing with right and wrong, with moral questions; and betting naturally accompanies it. The character of the voters is not staked. I cast my vote, perchance, as I think right; but I am not vitally concerned that that right should prevail. I am willing to leave it to the majority. Its obligation, therefore, never exceeds that of expediency. Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it. It is only expressing to men feebly your desire that it should prevail. A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority.

      Here, Thoreau discusses change through the power of voting. Only he questions whether voting is really making a difference. Voting is gambling and you think you are supporting the correct decision but will is succeed? The decision may be moral and just, but will it win against the majority? We should not waste time and allow the government to power more waiting for others to realize what is right. If we want to make a difference, we are going to have to do more which links to his protests.

    1. The administration is proposing cutting the EPA's budget by 31 percent, from $8.3 billion in fiscal year 2017 to $5.7 billion in fiscal year 2018. That's the largest cut among all Cabinet departments and major agencies.
      1. The EPA is having a huge cut by 31%. I dont think the Trump admin. realizes how important the EPA actually is and they are preparing for some huge domestic invasion with all of this military spending that may not even happen.
      2. The biggest increase is overall all kinds of military spending. This includes: Dep. of Homeland Security, Dep. of Veteran Affairs, and National Nuclear Security Admin. Trumps administration wants a large increase in defense spending even if that means huge cuts in other programs.
      3. My reaction is that it is very ridiculous and we do not need to spend this much on defense spending and Trump needs to realize that with his major increase, he is cutting very important social programs such as education spending and help for minorities. I feel like since the government is mostly Republican run, this budget plan will pass.
    1. But scientific research indicates the world was last this warm about 115,000 years ago and that the planet has not experienced such high levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for 4m years.

      Actually some of the more recent estimates have suggested that we may have crossed over the 400 ppm threshold briefly as recently as 2.4 Million years age.. And again at 2.9 Mya. (see Martinez-Boti et al., Nature, 2015: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v518/n7537/fig_tab/nature14145_ft.html). I think climate scientists typically think of the Pliocene as being the last time period where CO2 may have been more or less permanently above the 400 ppm threshold though, so perhaps this is what they are referring to here. It might be advisable to tidy up the terminology a little here nonetheless.

    1. 透過何政策履歷形成科技政策或文化政策,然後最後補助什麼東西跟產出什麼東西,必須是連結起來。

      The government has failed so miserably in the so-called technology policy over the past two decades (at least) I simply don't understand why it's still doing the same thing. Therefore, the (only?) hope may lie in using open government to facilate accountability.

      Having said that, I think "digital government" has a bigger role to play. It's more than "open government," and it has potentially transformative power. Look at the UK. If we fully tap into expertise from the human-centered design & service design communities and Taiwan's existing tech industries, I believe Taiwan can do even better. Consequently, the government will lead the private sector in innovation. As of now, it's more of an impediment.

    1. Although regulation through architecture is just as powerful as law, it is less identifiable and less visible to courts, legislators, and potential plaintiffs.77 While this observation suggests that decision makers should be even more diligent in analyzing the impact of architecture, research demonstrates that they often fail to take it seriously.78 To be clear, officials may understand that an architectural decision could have an exclusionary effect—they might even intend that result—but they generally do not see their decisions as a form of regulation that should be analyzed and patrolled in the same way that a law with the same effect would be. Exclusion through architecture should be subject to scrutiny that is equal to that afforded to other methods of exclusion by law.79

      I think we should not have exclusion in architecture towards minorities, it is unethical and not right, because with public transit unable to reach ends of the city, specifically our city of Atlanta, job opportunities become unreachable for those people, not everyone can afford buying a car.

    2. We often experience our physical environment without giving its features much thought. For example, one might think it a simple aesthetic design decision to create a park bench that is divided into three individual seats with armrests separating those seats. Yet the bench may have been created this way to prevent people—often homeless people—from lying down and taking naps.27 Similarly, upon seeing a bridge, or a one-way street, or a street sign, many people tend to think that these are just features of a place—innocuous and normal.

      Here we can see that, some people my think that Architecture of modern city, such as benches in particular, made to not give homeless people ability to sleep on them, by adding hands on them, but I personally think that it could also means, having your own seat, just like classrooms, be individual.

    3. We often experience our physical environment without giving its features much thought. For example, one might think it a simple aesthetic design decision to create a park bench that is divided into three individual seats with armrests separating those seats. Yet the bench may have been created this way to prevent people—often homeless people—from lying down and taking naps.

      This introductory paragraph really caused me to think back to my childhood parks and benches. It never once occurred to me why benches were so small or why they were uncomfortable or how no more than two people typically could sit on a bench at a time. Even when I did think longer onto it I believed it had to be for artistic value or because of budgetary cuts, and for all fairness it very well could have been, but now I began to look at the community as a whole I like many others avoid homeless people and try to keep it out of mind but now the issue has become more prominent to me because of this opening paragraph and opening my mind.

    1. Despite the potential benefits, how-ever, music educators may be hesitant to use social media for class purposes, given concerns regarding privacy, inappropriate usage, cyberbullying, and inappropriate student-teacher communications.

      This raises a lot of questions and concern for me. We are moving at such a fast pace with technology and being more connected to a cyber reality and less connected to human connection and interactions. When it comes to cyber bullying it is very scary to think about. When you think of bullying without technology it is hearbreaking to see a kid being picked on in the classroom. Cyberbullying can be even more dangerous becuase we don't actuallly see it happening or it's process. This created issues with students shutting down from their peers, feeling isolated. long term effects and in extreme cases thoughts or atrempts of suicide. In some ways this is out of educators control. How doe we monitor this kind of behaviour. Perhaps one way is bringing it up as a topic in the classroom. And allowing a space to discuss for the students. Here is a link to some statisitc on Cyber Bullying, which also rwfers to as Internet bullying. http://www.bullyingstatistics.org/content/cyber-bullying-statistics.html

    1. He motions over his shoulder with his thumb.

      Hey Chris,

      Loved this story. I think you have done an excellent job at building characterization between the two brothers. It's tricky to capture familial peculiarities, but I think it's well handled here. Couple of suggestions:

      1) I've marked several areas in the text where the narrator uses words that feel a bit thesaurus-y given his age. Given the beer drinking/insult-piling nature of the protag, it just seems out of context.

      2) Although nothing drastic needs to happen (I'm glad they survive the day), I would suggest adding more conflict into the beginning of the piece. To hook a reader, knowing two brothers are gearing up to drive with some beer may spell some conflict, but any additional level might help; a time limit with the car, somewhere they have to stop off, the hint that trespassing carries big penalties in this town...anything. Conflict drives the engine, and as is, we have one moment where it looks like Mike may have injured himself.

      All in all, a very smooth read. Authentic language, perfect snapshot of siblings at a particular stage and phase. Good job with this one.

    1. Neuroscientists endeavor to understand how the brain develops and controls our perception of the world and our interactions with it. Animal models enable investigations of the genetic, molecular, cellular, circuit-level and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying these processes. Noninvasive technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) complement these approaches by assessing human brain structure and neural responses to complex behaviors. In this issue, Nature Neuroscience presents a series of commissioned pieces that discuss recent progress in several noninvasive techniques and put forth conceptual frameworks under which we can examine neuroimaging data to deepen our understanding of these rich data sets. These advances may help connect findings from various species and achieve a more complete picture of the brain's structure and function.

      Main idea: Through the use of new technology of modern society, neuroscientists are able to learn more about the brain than they ever could before. What I think: Because of computer coding in MRI and other technologies, neuroscientists can now learn more about the brain than even before.

    1. Providing a malicious onLogin callback, for example popup a window into which the user may type their username and password

      This is something I do think we should have a plan for. I have a couple of suggestions:

      1. If we teach the Chrome extension to ignore settings from the host page, that should avoid this problem for the extension.
      2. For the embed, given that we allow publishers to customize the sidebar app UI in several ways, I think the app should verify that the publisher is trusted. How can this be done? If the publisher signed a grant token then the access token exchange already provides us with this proof. If the user is not logged in then we don't have any such proof. I did suggest that the publisher could create a grant token by signing a JWT where the userid was null as one approach.
    1. Seeing a bat flying at night, who among us truly thinks, “There is a creature that eats 8,000 mosquitoes a night, and without it we’d all have died of malaria by now.” It may be safe to say that the opposite is true, that we see a bat and think illness and death, all words akin to the vampire because it has always been blamed as the carrier for such horrors.

      True, bats are actually quite helpful. It's a shame we often portray them in such a negative light.

    1. I like what I look at, but what I look at and like I can’t locate–”   (So great is the confusion in which this lover wanders, lost!)   “My pain is even greater, for no ocean lies between us, nor some highway without end, nor mountain range to cross, nor gates to scale: only this shallow pool! He would be held, for every time I lean down to the surface and offer him my willing mouth to kiss, he, on his back, lifts up his lips toward mine– you’d think he could be touched! So very small a thing it is that keeps us from our loving! Come out and show yourself! Why do you mock me, singular boy? Where do you take yourself? Surely I’m young and sufficiently attractive to stay your flight! Why, even nymphs have loved me! I’ve no idea what hopes you mean to raise with that come-hither look of yours, but when I’ve reached down toward you, you’ve reached up again, and when I laughed, why, you laughed too, and often I have seen tears on your cheeks when I wept; you second all my motions, and the movement of your bow-shaped lips suggests that you respond with words to mine–although I never hear them!   But now I get it! I am that other one! I’ve finally seen through my own image! I burn with love for–me! The spark I kindle is the torch I carry: whatever can I do? Am I the favor-seeker, or the favor sought? Why seek at all, when all that I desire is mine already? Riches in such abundance that I’ve been left completely without means! Oh, would that I were able to secede from my own body, depart from what I love! (Now that‘s an odd request from any lover.) My grief is draining me, my end is near; soon I will be extinguished in my prime. This death is no grave matter, for it brings an end to sorrow. Of course, I would have been delighted if my beloved could have lived on, but now in death we two will merge as one.”   Maddened by grief, he spoke and then turned back to his image in the water, which his tears had troubled; when he saw it darkly wavering, he cried out, “Stay! Where are you going? O cruel, to desert your lover! Touch may be forbidden, but looking isn’t: then let me look at you and feed my wretched frenzy on your image.”   And while he mourned, he lifted up his tunic and with hard palms, he beat on his bare breasts until his skin took on a rosy color, as parti-colored apples blanch and blush, or clustered grapes, that sometimes will assume a tinge of purple in their unripened state; the water clears; he sees what he has done and can bear no more; just as the golden wax melts when it’s warmed, or as the morning’s frost retreats before the early sun’s scant heat, so he dissolves, wasted by his passion slowly consumed by fires deep within. Now is no more the blushing white complexion, the manly strength and all that pleased the eye, the figure that was once quite dear to Echo. And seeing this, she mourned although still mindful of her angry pain; as often as the wretched boy cried, “Alas!” she answered with “Alas!” And when he struck his torso with his fists, Echo responded with the same tattoo. His last words were directed to the pool: “Alas, dear boy, whom I have vainly cherished!” Those words returned to him again, and when he cried “Farewell!” “Farewell!” cried Echo back. His weary head sank to the grass; death closed those eyes transfixed once by their master’s beauty, but on the ferry ride across the Styx, his gaze into its current did not waver. The water nymphs, his sisters, cut their locks in mourning for him, and the wood nymphs, too, and Echo echoed all their lamentations; but after they’d arranged his funeral, gotten the logs, the bier, the brandished torches, the boy’s remains were nowhere to be found; instead, a flower, whose white petals fit closely around a saffron-colored center.       Categories Antigone creation myths greece instructor's note maya civilization mesopotamia online work week 2 Online Work Week 3 online work week 5 online work week 6 Plato and Socrates recipe week 1 thousand and one nights Uncategorized Recent Posts Work for Thursday – Thousand and One Nights SOPHOCLES, ANTIGONE Questions 1,3 and 4 Readings for Tuesday’s Class Antigone – Answered Questions Recent Commentsj.wu32 on Readings for Tuesday’s Classj.green on Please sign up for Greek Theatre Topic!j.picotte on Please sign up for Greek Theatre Topic!k.butler on Please sign up for Greek Theatre Topic!AGeertsma on Work for next TuesdayTags845to718 accountingmajor adaptable affectionate analysis Antigone anxious Baptism Beginning Creon dreamer Ea english Enuma Elish food Gaia Gods greece Greece Dark Ages hardworker Hesiod immigrant intro Jamaican Jewish King's Role korean lazy Marduk Mayan Muses Persuasion Polytheistic Popol Vuh recipe Religion rhetoric sassy server Socrates tenneessee Theogony Tiamat welcome Zeus

      He cant touch and feel the reflection he sees and is getting frustrated. Not the smartest person out there.

    1. Eating with friends and family and not having everyone glued to their smart devices." Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock"...checking up on the latest post that their friend made on Facebook when they're sitting exactly four feet away." - adamrocks84 var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Eating with friends and family and not having everyone glued to their smart devices.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#eating-with-friends-and-family-and-not-having-everyone-glued-to-their-smart-devices-8"; curSlideObj.anchor = "eating-with-friends-and-family-and-not-having-everyone-glued-to-their-smart-devices-8"; curSlideObj.index = 7; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#eating-with-friends-and-family-and-not-having-everyone-glued-to-their-smart-devices-8";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads ="\n\t<div data-bi-ad data-ad-container class=\"ad dfp\" data-adunit=\"desktop\/tech\/sai\/slideshow\" data-authors=\"megan-willett\" data-pagetype=\"slideshow\" data-refresh-frequency=\"4\" data-region=\"Slideshow One Page Ad Desktop\" data-responsive=\"null\" data-sizes=\"970x250,728x90,600x200,600x480,300x250\" data-tag=\"features,reddit,internet,digital-culture,tech-insider\" data-url=\"\/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12\/\" data-views=\"10001-500000\">\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t<script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\t\t(function() {\n\t\t\t'use strict';\n\t\t\t\/\/ Notify the DFP code that a new ad has just been rendered\n\t\t\tamplify.publish('adRender');\n\t\t}());\n\t<\/script>\n"; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "A certain amount of ignorance." Flickr"Sure, [the internet has] made me more educated about several topics but, in many ways, I feel like I know too much because everything gets posted now." - GirlDontThrowawayMad var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;A certain amount of ignorance.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#a-certain-amount-of-ignorance-9"; curSlideObj.anchor = "a-certain-amount-of-ignorance-9"; curSlideObj.index = 8; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#a-certain-amount-of-ignorance-9";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Everything not being spoiled immediately." Paul Szoldra/Tech Insider- Zandyne var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Everything not being spoiled immediately.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#everything-not-being-spoiled-immediately-10"; curSlideObj.anchor = "everything-not-being-spoiled-immediately-10"; curSlideObj.index = 9; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#everything-not-being-spoiled-immediately-10";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Being able to have debates/discussions without being sh---y to one another." LaVladina/Flickr"Anonymity is a sure-fire way to make anyone act like a childish a--hole in a reasonable discussion." - VheloGrace var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Being able to have debates/discussions without being sh---y to one another.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#being-able-to-have-debatesdiscussions-without-being-sh-y-to-one-another-11"; curSlideObj.anchor = "being-able-to-have-debatesdiscussions-without-being-sh-y-to-one-another-11"; curSlideObj.index = 10; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#being-able-to-have-debatesdiscussions-without-being-sh-y-to-one-another-11";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Enjoying the moment or wanting to do something because it's fun." Flickr / JasonParis"People seem like they just want to do things so they can take pictures with their phones and post to social media. [They] just want to show off to their friends and have everyone look at them and be jealous." - drsquires var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Enjoying the moment or wanting to do something because it's fun.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#enjoying-the-moment-or-wanting-to-do-something-because-its-fun-12"; curSlideObj.anchor = "enjoying-the-moment-or-wanting-to-do-something-because-its-fun-12"; curSlideObj.index = 11; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#enjoying-the-moment-or-wanting-to-do-something-because-its-fun-12";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads ="\n\t<div data-bi-ad data-ad-container class=\"ad dfp\" data-adunit=\"desktop\/tech\/sai\/slideshow\" data-authors=\"megan-willett\" data-pagetype=\"slideshow\" data-refresh-frequency=\"4\" data-region=\"Slideshow One Page Ad Desktop\" data-responsive=\"null\" data-sizes=\"970x250,728x90,600x200,600x480,300x250\" data-tag=\"features,reddit,internet,digital-culture,tech-insider\" data-url=\"\/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12\/\" data-views=\"10001-500000\">\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t<script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\t\t(function() {\n\t\t\t'use strict';\n\t\t\t\/\/ Notify the DFP code that a new ad has just been rendered\n\t\t\tamplify.publish('adRender');\n\t\t}());\n\t<\/script>\n"; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Mix tapes." ramsey everydaypants/Flickr "Like the cassettes. I would sit [for] hours in front of the radio, wait[ing] for just the right song to come on and then [I would] hit record." - rubaduck   var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Mix tapes.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#mix-tapes-13"; curSlideObj.anchor = "mix-tapes-13"; curSlideObj.index = 12; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#mix-tapes-13";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "My work ethic." Adikos/Flickr"90% of my internet use at work is not business related, and those hours cannot be made up. I am not as productive as I once was, and I'm lucky I own the place. Otherwise I'd fire [myself]." - Scrappy_Laue var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;My work ethic.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#my-work-ethic-14"; curSlideObj.anchor = "my-work-ethic-14"; curSlideObj.index = 13; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#my-work-ethic-14";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Kids playing outside a lot more." Shutterstock"Neighborhoods are ghost towns now.” - El_Frijol var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Kids playing outside a lot more.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#kids-playing-outside-a-lot-more-15"; curSlideObj.anchor = "kids-playing-outside-a-lot-more-15"; curSlideObj.index = 14; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#kids-playing-outside-a-lot-more-15";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "I miss my attention span." Reuters/Phil Noble- addywoot var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;I miss my attention span.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#i-miss-my-attention-span-16"; curSlideObj.anchor = "i-miss-my-attention-span-16"; curSlideObj.index = 15; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#i-miss-my-attention-span-16";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads ="\n\t<div data-bi-ad data-ad-container class=\"ad dfp\" data-adunit=\"desktop\/tech\/sai\/slideshow\" data-authors=\"megan-willett\" data-pagetype=\"slideshow\" data-refresh-frequency=\"4\" data-region=\"Slideshow One Page Ad Desktop\" data-responsive=\"null\" data-sizes=\"970x250,728x90,600x200,600x480,300x250\" data-tag=\"features,reddit,internet,digital-culture,tech-insider\" data-url=\"\/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12\/\" data-views=\"10001-500000\">\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t<script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\t\t(function() {\n\t\t\t'use strict';\n\t\t\t\/\/ Notify the DFP code that a new ad has just been rendered\n\t\t\tamplify.publish('adRender');\n\t\t}());\n\t<\/script>\n"; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Serendipity." flequi/Flickr"Running into friends you hadn't seen in a long time, and having a great time without planning it all out. Flipping through the channels one by one, and something catches your attention that you would never watch using a guide." - Piktoggle var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Serendipity.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#serendipity-17"; curSlideObj.anchor = "serendipity-17"; curSlideObj.index = 16; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#serendipity-17";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Writing." Flickr/daniel sandoval"I used to write when I was bored. Now it's a lot harder to be bored, so I have to actively choose to sit down and write, which means that I write less and there's less variety in topic/format." - laidymondegreen var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Writing.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#writing-18"; curSlideObj.anchor = "writing-18"; curSlideObj.index = 17; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#writing-18";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "Privacy!" Shutterstock"Have you ever googled your full name and city/state/location? It's insane how much personal information you can find about yourself online if you know how to search for it." - Whatsamattahere var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;Privacy!&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#privacy-19"; curSlideObj.anchor = "privacy-19"; curSlideObj.index = 18; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#privacy-19";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); "My innocence." Shutterstock- ParkourPants var curSlideObj = {}; curSlideObj.title = "&quot;My innocence.&quot;"; curSlideObj.postTitle = "People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet"; curSlideObj.url = "http://www.businessinsider.com/what-do-you-miss-about-life-before-the-internet-2015-12/#my-innocence-20"; curSlideObj.anchor = "my-innocence-20"; curSlideObj.index = 19; curSlideObj.embeds = {}; curSlideObj.slideShareButtonsEnabled = true; curSlideObj.name ="/#my-innocence-20";curSlideObj.embeds =[];curSlideObj.html ="";curSlideObj.ads =""; BI.vaop.push(curSlideObj); SEE ALSO: Russia is threatening to ban Reddit More: Features Reddit Internet Digital Culture Tech Insider facebook linkedin twitter email print window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push({mode:'thumbs-1r', container:'taboola-below-main-column', placement:'below-main-column'}); ×     by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links Recommended from the WebEverQuote Insurance QuotesSan Jose, California: This Brilliant Company Is Disrupting a $1…EverQuote Insurance QuotesUndoHome ChefSan Jose: This Meal Service is Cheaper Than Your Local StoreHome ChefUndoFree Solar EnergyThere Is a No Cost Solar Program in California? (This is Crazy)Free Solar EnergyUndoHomeLight.comUse Data To Sell Your Home FastHomeLight.comUndoCoffeeBeans | Angelino&#39;sA Coffee Lover's Top 3 Alternatives to Expensive Keurig K-CupsCoffeeBeans | Angelino'sUndoCup of Jo for Bombas SocksHere's Why Everyone's Obsessed With These SocksCup of Jo for Bombas SocksUndoMack WeldonYou Won't Find Underwear Like This Anywhere Else...Mack WeldonUndoNewRetirementReverse Mortgage Loan Amounts Disappoint ManyNewRetirementUndoSolar AmericaHomeowners Are Paying Next to Nothing For Solar PanelsSolar AmericaUndoHome Solar QuotesThinking About Going Solar In 2017? Read This FirstHome Solar QuotesUndo Recommended For You Powered by Sailthru Former CIA Director Michael Hayden slams pro-Trump media for peddling 'illegitimate' and 'non-fact-based worldview' Bitcoin plunges sharply and suddenly WikiLeaks dumps thousands of documents it says come from the CIA's cyberunit Uber's 'hustle-oriented' culture becomes a black mark on employees' résumés These are the 18 most popular YouTube stars in the world — and some are making millions People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet People on Reddit reveal what they miss most about life before the internet It's safe to say the internet has changed... Recommended For You The Trump administration reportedly wants to fund the border wall by gutting agencies that protect against terrorism (function() { 'use strict'; // Notify the DFP code that a new ad has just been rendered amplify.publish('adRender'); }()); Real-time market data. Get the latest on stocks, commodities, currencies, funds, rates, ETFs, and more from almost 100 global exchanges. Dow -32.53 20,921.81 (-0.20%) 1:52:55 PM EST Nasdaq -7.24 5,841.94 (-0.10%) 1:53:22 PM EST S&P 500 -5.75 2,369.56 (-0.20%) 1:58:21 PM EST FTSE 100 -11.13 7,338.99 (-0.20%) 11:35:29 AM EST (function() { 'use strict'; // Notify the DFP code that a new ad has just been rendered amplify.publish('adRender'); }()); Disclaimer Sponsored LinksSponsored LinksPromoted LinksPromoted LinksVideos You May LikeA Navy SEAL explains what to do …UndoMICHAEL MOORE: 'I think …UndoHere's why some people have …UndoThe model who quit Insta…Undoby Taboolaby Taboola window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push({mode: 'organic-thumbnails-e', container: 'taboola-right-rail-thumbnails', placement: 'Right Rail Thumbnails', target_type: 'video'}); (function() { 'use strict'; // Notify the DFP code that a new ad has just been rendered amplify.publish(''); }()); Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links From The WebNasdaqThis Black Card is Taking SF by StormNasdaqUndoBlue ApronI Tried Blue Apron and Here's What HappenedBlue ApronUndo    by Taboola by Taboola  window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push({mode: 'ab_thumbnails-a_2x1', container: 'taboola-right-rail-thumbnails-2', placement: 'Right Rail Thumbnails 2nd', target_type: 'video'}); BI.dianomi.setConfigKey(true); BI.dianomi.init('US'); Featured A Nobel Prize-winning biologist reveals the biggest mistake she made early in her career More "Idea Factory" » We just created the best Google Chrome extension on the market for latest news headlines More "BI Innovations" » Tech Insider Emails & Alerts Get the best of Business Insider delivered to your inbox every day. Sign-Up BI Intelligence Exclusive Get The 30 Big Tech Predictions for 2017 Report from BI Intelligence » Get the Slide Deck from Henry Blodget's IGNITION Presentation on the Future of Digital     Read Business Insider On The Go Available on iOS or Android amplify.publish('editorial-sidebar-loaded', 'editorial2'); Find A Job Tech Jobs C-Level Jobs Media Jobs Design Jobs Finance Jobs Sales Jobs See All Jobs » Thanks to our partners (function() { 'use strict'; // Notify the DFP code that a new ad has just been rendered amplify.publish(''); }());

      This would be a good thing to talk about in the interview, this seems to be a major difference. It isn't so much a problem in many situations but when trying to have a family event it can prevent people from connecting in real life.

    1. women, the plain and the colored.

      I recognize that this may just be the manner of thinking for that time but I can't help but wonder what experiences may have affected this way of thinking. I feel like even if it was common to see women as less than men, if you had interactions with women that were more than just "plain or colored" you wouldn't necessarily think this was true. I also think that having negative or boring experiences with women would have brought out this feeling. or possibly even a lack of attraction to women which is where we can see Wilde hinting through his writing.

    1. o field of study seemed for-eign to him, and his many books and articles are marked by his continuing enthusi-asm for psychology, linguistics, anthropology, information theory, and philosophy.

      Gor. Some answers, Socrates, are of necessity longer; but I will do my best to make them as short as possible; for a part of my profession is that I can be as short as any one.

      Soc. That is what is wanted, Gorgias; exhibit the shorter method now, and the longer one at some other time.

      Gor. Well, I will; and you will certainly say, that you never heard a man use fewer words.

      Soc. Very good then; as you profess to be a rhetorician, and a maker of rhetoricians, let me ask you, with what is rhetoric concerned: I might ask with what is weaving concerned, and you would reply (would you not?), with the making of garments?

      Gor. Yes.

      Soc. And music is concerned with the composition of melodies?

      Gor. It is.

      Soc. By Here, Gorgias, I admire the surpassing brevity of your answers.

      Gor. Yes, Socrates, I do think myself good at that.

      Soc. I am glad to hear it; answer me in like manner about rhetoric: with what is rhetoric concerned?

      Gor. With discourse.

      Soc. What sort of discourse, Gorgias?-such discourse as would teach the sick under what treatment they might get well?

      Gor. No.

      Soc. Then rhetoric does not treat of all kinds of discourse?

      Gor. Certainly not.

      Soc. And yet rhetoric makes men able to speak?

      Gor. Yes.

      Soc. And to understand that about which they speak?

      Gor. Of course.

      Soc. But does not the art of medicine, which we were just now mentioning, also make men able to understand and speak about the sick?

      Gor. Certainly.

      Soc. Then medicine also treats of discourse?

      Gor. Yes.

      Soc. Of discourse concerning diseases?

      Gor. Just so.

      Soc. And does not gymnastic also treat of discourse concerning the good or evil condition of the body?

      Gor. Very true.

      Soc. And the same, Gorgias, is true of the other arts:-all of them treat of discourse concerning the subjects with which they severally have to do.

      Gor. Clearly.

      Soc. Then why, if you call rhetoric the art which treats of discourse, and all the other arts treat of discourse, do you not call them arts of rhetoric?

      Gor. Because, Socrates, the knowledge of the other arts has only to do with some sort of external action, as of the hand; but there is no such action of the hand in rhetoric which works and takes effect only through the medium of discourse. And therefore I am justified in saying that rhetoric treats of discourse.

      Soc. I am not sure whether I entirely understand you, but I dare say I shall soon know better; please to answer me a question:-you would allow that there are arts?

      Gor. Yes.

      Soc. As to the arts generally, they are for the most part concerned with doing, and require little or no speaking; in painting, and statuary, and many other arts, the work may proceed in silence; and of such arts I suppose you would say that they do not come within the province of rhetoric.

      Gor. You perfectly conceive my meaning, Socrates.

    1. On landing, we found the town a heap of ruins. A more terrible picture of desolation cannot be imagined. Passing through streets choaked with rubbish, we reached with difficulty a house which had escaped the general fate. The people live in tents, or make a kind of shelter, by laying a few boards across the half-consumed beams; for the buildings being — 3 — here of hewn stone, with walls three feet thick, only the roofs and floors have been destroyed. But to hear of the distress which these unfortunate people have suffered, would fill with horror the stoutest heart, and make the most obdurate melt with pity.

      When seeing the title of this novel for the first time, readers may think that Sansay's "Horrors" of Saint Domingo are the atrocities, such as enslavement and exploitation, that the European colonists committed against the native peoples. We discussed in class, however, that Sansay is actually referring to the the ways in which the enslaved natives rebelled against their white oppressors during the Haitian revolution. Upon arriving in Santo Domingo, the main protagonist Mary says, "A more terrible picture could not be imagined," which suggests that she is not used to seeing the mistreatment of the white inhabitants (62). The mention that “the people live in tents, or make a kind of shelter,” is her main evidence of the the colonists’ misfortunes. Subsequently, she notes that “only the roofs and floors [of the houses] have been destroyed,”(62). The partial collapse of these houses foreshadows Clara's marital issues and destruction of Clara’s “domestic tranquility,” due to her flirtations with General Rochambeau (83). In addition, this passage hints at the later razing of the town and massacre of the white inhabitants by the revolutionaries (122-124). Finally, this passage includes the first use of the word “horrors” in this novel; this ultimately implies that the main focus of these “horrors” and the overall book will be the about the violence of the Haitian revolutionaries against the European colonizers.

  5. Feb 2017
    1. 1) Why annotate?

      First, we are working on building up ideas for longer assignments; you may find yourselves citing conversations that take place “within the pages” of Wilde’s novel in your next essay assignment!

      Second, we are trying to read as a community: to have a “discussion” that is grounded in specific textual details.

      In a way, every famous book draws much of its meaning from the historical “conversation” about that book: if we could read, say, Shakespeare’s Hamlet with 500 years worth of “annotations” in its margins….well, that “book” would be unreadably long. An editor of a text with a long history considers that text’s potential audience, and their needs, and then draws some small portion of the historical discussion of that text into their own edition. (Consider the notes I’ve given you to Wilde’s “Helas”, a single 14-line poem—I provide everything the editors provide, and add one very small thing I discovered myself…)

      Reading as a community will also answer the question “WHO are we annotating FOR?” Some of you have more experience with late 19th-century literature than other; but all of you are readers born around the turn of the millenium. Think of these notes as being written for each other and to help other readers of a similar background to yourselves.

    1. We often experience our physical environment without giving its features much thought. For example, one might think it a simple aesthetic design decision to create a park bench that is divided into three individual seats with armrests separating those seats. Yet the bench may have been created this way to prevent people—often homeless people—from lying down and taking naps.

      In the supplmentaly reading, it stated how over 130,000 signed a petition to have the metal spikes in the ground removed, which prevented homeless people from sleeping in those areas. The article continued on to say that despite this large number of people petitioning against the attempts to deterr homeless people, not many people have realized that everyday objects that we use, such as benches, have been strategically designed to prevent anyone from sleeping on them, homeless people more specifically.

  6. literaryanalysisscsu307.wordpress.com literaryanalysisscsu307.wordpress.com
    1. A third draws aimless patterns in the dirt

      Who is the "third"? Is the third a child or someone she loved? I feel as these lines could be somewhat confusing to readers because we go from one setting (her kids) to another setting (someone she once loved). One may thi nk that the third is someone who she once loved seeing as these lines are enjammed and there are no puncuation. However, after reading further and specifically in line 5, I see that it says "to feign indifference to that casual nod." Now, I feel as if this is someone she once loved. Ultimately, I don't think any parent would just give a nod to one of their childre--someone who they love unconditionally.

    1. Should “learning to code” become a school requirement, and if so how do we cram it into an already overloaded curriculum?

      This is an important point to mention because with an increasing amount of stressed out students, piling more heavy work on them may not be as beneficial as the STEM hopefuls might think. Maybe students could be introduced to coding at a slow pace and in a smaller amount of time and then if they find themselves interested then they can pursue studying the topic further in high school.

    1. Having a Parent Behind Bars Costs Children, States Having a parent in jail or prison can take an emotional toll on children and lead to higher foster care and welfare rolls. Some states are trying to address it. by Teresa Wiltz, Stateline.org / May 24, 2016 0 Inmates at the National Bilibid Prison are “virtually in touch” with their loved ones. flickr/vickens_dan Jamaill never knew his mother. When he was 1, his father was incarcerated, and Jamaill got to know him largely through letters and phone calls. Twice a year, he would trek from Brooklyn to an upstate New York prison to visit — a trip that involved a plane ride, a long drive and an overnight stay in a motel. Now, the 10th-grader’s father has been transferred to another prison even farther away. So they’ll stay in touch with “televisits,” video-conferenced meetings. Jamaill doesn’t think it should be so hard for kids to see their imprisoned parents. And that’s what he told New York state legislators in March. “Incarcerated parents need to be closer to home,” said Jamaill, 15, who lives with his grandmother and doesn’t want his last name used because he doesn’t want to further stigmatize his father. “Some people have to drive nine, 10 hours to see their parents — and then only have 30 minutes to talk to them.” Many states are beginning to look at a growing body of research that shows that having a parent behind bars can have a destabilizing effect on an estimated 1.7 million children like Jamaill. The separation can have costly emotional and social consequences, such as trauma and trouble in schools, homelessness, and bigger welfare and foster care rolls. Some states are encouraging greater contact between the children and their parents by using new technology such as televisiting, or by placing parents in the closest correctional facility. And some are trying to intervene when a parent is charged, tried and convicted of a crime to provide emotional support and a stable home for the children. In New York, for example, the Senate’s corrections committee advanced a bill in March that would create a pilot program that places sentenced parents in the nearest jail or prison. The federal government allows states to use funding from the National Family Caregiver Support Program to provide grandparents and other elderly relatives who care for the children with services such as counseling. Washington, for example, has a statewide network of “kinship navigators” that connects families and extended relatives with legal services, health care and parenting classes. Some states also are looking at ways to better reconnect children with their parents after they leave jail or prison, and to help ease the parents back into society to provide a more stable family life for their children. In Georgia, a statewide council on criminal justice reform tailors policy and services designed to reduce the barriers to employment after a parent is released from prison. In California, the state suspends child support payments for anyone who is incarcerated for more than 90 days. This prevents late fees on child support payments from piling up while parents are locked up, which can often create insurmountable debt when they are released. In San Francisco, a coalition of nonprofits, representatives of government bodies and advocates work together to ensure the well-being of children of incarcerated parents at every step of their involvement with the criminal justice system. This includes protocols on steps police officers should take to minimize trauma on children who witness a parent’s arrest, sentencing guidelines and life after prison. “The trauma associated with having an incarcerated parent is like that of divorce or domestic violence,” said Scot Spencer of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, a research and advocacy group that focuses on child welfare. “There’s an emotional and an economic impact.” Staggering Numbers More than 5 million children, or one in 14, in the U.S. have had a parent in state or federal prison at some point in their lives, according to the Casey Foundation. Their numbers swelled by 79 percent between 1991 and 2007, according to U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) figures, largely driven by tough drug laws and mandatory sentencing. Thirteen percent of the children in Kentucky have had a parent behind bars, the largest percentage of any state, according to an April report from the Casey Foundation. Indiana follows at 11 percent. New Jersey has the lowest, at 3 percent, followed by New York, at 4 percent. Children of color are much more likely to have a parent in prison. One in nine African-American children had a parent behind bars in 2008, according to a Pew Charitable Trusts report (Pew also funds Stateline). One in 28 Latino children had an incarcerated parent and one in 57 white children did. Sixty-two percent of women in state prisons reported having minor children and 51 percent of male state prisoners did, according to the BJS. Maintaining close connections with a parent behind bars appears to be good for a child’s emotional well-being and for the parent, said state Sen. Gustavo Rivera, sponsor of the New York bill to set up a pilot project to move incarcerated parents closer to their children. Closer family bonds tend to reduce recidivism, he said, and his project can help demonstrate that. “Having that connection is a positive for the child; it’s positive for the incarcerated individual,” Rivera, a Democrat, said. “And it’s a positive for society. When we have people that are working, productive members of society, they’re not wasting [taxpayer] money.” Kiara, an 18-year-old high school senior from Brooklyn, agrees that it’s important for children to be close to their incarcerated parents. Her father has been in and out of prison since she was a baby. Mostly, they’ve kept in touch through letters and email, and an occasional visit. These days, her dad is incarcerated at New York’s Coxsackie Correctional Facility, more than a two hours’ drive north from Brooklyn. The last time she saw her dad was in November. Visiting him is a hassle, she said, because it involves long lines and hours of waiting. “Then I only have an hour to talk to him,” said Kiara, who doesn’t want her last name used because she said she doesn’t trust anyone but her family and counselors with information about her father’s incarceration. But the effort to stay close is worth it, she said. “We grew a good relationship,” Kiara said. “There’s no negativity, only joy. I can tell him things I wouldn’t be able to tell my mom. He gives me good advice. He tells me he doesn’t want me to end up like him.” Help After Prison Many children can fall through the cracks when a parent is sent to prison, especially if the parent was the child’s sole support, some children’s advocates say. And it can be difficult for states to help them. In New York, for instance, no city or state agency is solely responsible for coordinating services and tracking the well-being of the more than 100,000 children with a parent behind bars, said Tanya Krupat, program director for the NY Initiative for Children of Incarcerated Parents at the Osborne Association, a nonprofit based in Brooklyn. Incarceration also often forces families deeper into poverty and debt, the Casey Foundation report said. Their families are more likely to rely on public welfare programs such as food stamps and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. And these children may be more likely to join the other 400,000 children throughout the U.S. in state foster care. When an incarcerated parent is released, the families continue to struggle with finding work and a place to live because of the stigma attached to a criminal conviction. That’s prompted some states to pass so-called ban the box laws that prohibit employers from asking about a person’s criminal history in job applications as a way of encouraging employment after prison. Georgia, which has an incarceration rate 32 percent higher than the national average, has taken several steps in the past few years to help ease the transition from prison to society and help former inmates gain employment — with a goal to help provide stability for their children. This year, the Legislature passed bills to lift the state’s lifetime ban on food stamps for people with felony drug convictions, allow judges to seal the records of first-time offenders at sentencing, help ease the way to get occupational licenses and provide retroactive reinstatement of driver’s licenses revoked for drug offenses. Lawmakers also created a tax incentive program that encourages employers to hire parolees. If former prisoners “can’t take care of themselves, they can’t take care of their own families,” said Doug Ammar of the Georgia Justice Project, an Atlanta-based advocacy group that worked with the Legislature in crafting the laws. Family Ties In Brooklyn, Jamaill is counting the days until his father is released from prison, although he will be 20 by then. He plans to be in college, so he’s not sure if he’ll be living with his father, or if his father will have to live in a halfway house. There is one thing he is sure about, however. “The second they tell me he’s out, I’m driving out there,” he said. “I’m going to be right there, waiting for him.”

      The article touches on the tragic account of a child whose parent is incarcerated and located at a prison hundreds of miles from where he is living. Many people are having to travel numerous hours, board a plane, and make extra effort to see their parents for thirty minutes to an hour.

      States are beginning to look at the expanding research of the costs to children with parents behind bars. Separation can take a toll on emotional and social health of children, and cause issues in school and behavior.

      New York has created a program that allows the parents to be located in nearby jails and prisons to remain close to the children. Washington has a “Kinship Navigator” program that connects families to legal services, health care, and parenting classes to help families remain connected. Other states have programs that allow children and parents to video-chat as a means of communication.

      Many other states are trying to combat the issue by working with grants and existing services, as well as nonprofits and other entities that can help alleviate the burden on states and local governments.

      While other entities are trying to compensate for what the government doesn’t provide, the number of children with parents behind bars are increasing, due to mandatory sentencing and tough drug laws. It’s apparent that more public policy avenues need to be addressed in order to rehabilitate incarcerated parents and keep families together. Deeper issues such as systemic racism in the criminal justice system also need to be addressed so that children of minorities are not being disproportionately affected by prison sentences.

    1. And a colorblind society is not the solution to racism.

      This made me think about the issue of representation of people of color in literature. In many ways, we can look at some novels as colorblind, because the authors do not mention the race of the characters in them. But because these novels take place in and cater to mainstream society, readers are encouraged to assume that the characters are white. So then no representation of any race simply becomes an exclusive representation of whiteness. Ignoring color very quickly becomes only seeing white.

    2. “social construct” as being synonymous with non-existent.

      I find this paragraph incredibly interesting. Viewing race as a social construct is completely valid. I am very passionate about history and seeking out the context (or sometimes rationale) behind events and periods of time. I think this article raises an interesting and potent point that we need to acknowledge where racism comes from in order to be able to eradicate it. We look different from one another, but race and racism in the United States (as well as around the world) is much bigger than that. To discount the reality that race is a social construct, in the context that its importance was manufactured, is to discredit racism. Very much like the Black Lives Matter movement, and what we read, combating racism does mean combating elements of our system that oppress people of colour.

    3. Because race was socially constructed by Europeans, white people are seen as “raceless,” whereas people of color are racialized. This leads us to see white people through the lens of personhood before race, while not giving people of color the same treatment.

      This statement made me think about James Baldwin's discussion of history in The White Man's Guilt. In it, he states that, "...people who imagine that history flatters them (as it does, indeed, since they wrote it) are impaled on their history like a butterfly on a pin and become incapable of seeing or changing themselves, or the world." Because race is socially constructed, and white people perpetuated this construction, then we hold the power to disengage from race, and see ourselves as raceless. What I mean by raceless, and what I understand the article to mean by this term as well, is that the race does not go away, but it is not the transient component of my identity. I, as a white person, get to be viewed as an individual rather than as a representation of my race. I suppose that the way to extend this privilege to others would be, to continue Baldwin's metaphor, to release the pin in order to be able to challenge ourselves and the structures that surround us. But how does a butterfly release themself from their pin?

    1. The movie makes you want to slice up some Persians.”

      The author says in this whole article that the film pursues a sort of racist standard against middle-easterners and supports conflict and opinions against them. First off, i think it's important to remember that this conflict, while stylized heavily in the movie, did happen. There was a conflict, the battle took place, and was part of a great war between two very different cultures, at odds mostly for reasons of incompatibility. Even in the frames of the movie though, Spartans fight out of desire to protect their dominance in their society, their honor. Their freedom.They do not fight the Persian army because they hate the Persians. They fight the Persians because this massive army arrives on their doorstep and their character compels them not to subordinate themselves to the opposing force. This is congruent with Spartan ideals. Regardless of the film's historical depiction of the battle, the mores of the Spartan are more or less in line with what History tells us, though maybe tempered with some more modern twists. I think in the end, I would have a hard time calling the film racist--at least for the reasons the author describes here. Spartans are fiercely independent as portrayed, and consider themselves better warriors than their neighbors. This quality can be confused by the viewer as xenophobia, but I think pride is a more apt term. In the end, does the film depict Persians as the "bad guy"? Yeah. And it does so by assigning the bad guy the opposite values of the Spartans. Those values would've been assigned to whomever the bad guy was. In this case we have historical grounding for the choice made. I guess personally, I view 300 as a film. Art. On some level, all movies are made to communicate a message, and that message hinges on the viewer's ability to interpret it. All great art is grounded in knowledge, and especially in references to other art, history, pop culture, etc. It needs to form connections existing parts of people's minds. This places a burden of responsibility on the viewer to discern well what the movie is saying, rather than simply view it as an emotional ride and visual spectacle. In my experience watching the movie, I don't walk out of the theater saying, "Man, it really makes you want to slice up some Persians" because Persians are the worst people on earth, and how could they be so bad. It does, however, make me say, "Man, if it came down to it, I would really love to be able to fight some bad guy like that". To me, this is, however, the same idea, just with different phrasing. It appeals to our culture's understanding of masculinity and honor. It makes a male viewer desire the body and skills he's just seen portrayed. Now, importantly, I did not grow up at a time when culture was influencing my thoughts post 9/11. Maybe if I'd been older at that time, I would've identified more with the Spartans fighting Middle-Easteners. And maybe Frank Miller should have thought that through, thought about how that choice would link to the modern world. Maybe, as his NPR interview suggests, he does think America should stand up in defense of itself. But again, I think that's pride speaking. I don't think it's racism. While Frank Miller could arguably be called racist (which is pretty subjective from just one interview), and is certainly not very well educated about Islamic History (again, mere words being spoken in an interview situation so not necessarily represent 100% of the man's ideas), I don't think his Spartans are racist, nor misunderstanding. They see a threat of their masculinity. That's really all Leoinides responds to. Xerxes makes him an offer he almost can't refuse, he seems to have actually thought about it. He simply won't kneel. Thus, Miller may be racist, but his Spartans aren't. Elitist yes, prideful certainly. But I'm not quite getting a racism vibe.

    1. My personal opinions aside…..I have given this section a good bit of thought and believe I can summarize constructively:

      The introductory video from Joseph R. DesJardins (Ethics and International Standards of Behavior - we should name him BTW) sets the stage very well for how and why businesses are (and should be) stakeholders in global standards of behavior.

      He provides good guidance and an outline we could follow to provide a business centric context for this section. As a business instructor I am prepared to discuss and teach a business’s global stewardship and the various global organizations like WTO, IPCC etc.. Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry and the UBS case study is a very relevant and teachable from a business perspective.

      I am not however prepared to discuss or teach C02 levels of emission or scientific findings on greenhouse gases. This whole section becomes vulnerable to scientific arguments and may miss opportunity to make the relevant business point.

      I think if we renamed this section “International Standards for Corporate Social Responsibility” instead of “Climate Change” it would help to emphasize the relevance to business. Climate change then becomes “an example of”.

      I suggest we change (broaden) the last 2 outcomes:

      o Identify the key causes of man-made “climate change” change to "Important 21st century global business issues". o Describe cap-and-trade systems for limiting carbon dioxide emission Change to: "the impact of global regulatory systems, such as cap-and-trade on businesses today". Then reword to emphasize business (I’ve made some suggestions throughout)

    1. One thing I do agree with in this is when it talks about the awkwardness for whites talking about race. I think for most whites there is not a lot of talk about race because we may feel as though we will be ignorant when we do talk about it. I think society has made race into such a touchy subject that a lot of people just don't say anything when it comes up.

    1. Social Change: Interdisciplinarians work to build connections across divided ideas, and we seek out new ways of conceptualizing knowledge. This can lead us to truly change the world, structure our world differently, and see ourselves as connected in a wide web of humanity.

      I think that many people on campus are divided by major. People may think their major may be more important than someone else's major but by combining and perhaps forcing these two majors per se to work together, we can structure new ways of thinking.

    1. Is not every man born as free by nature as his father? Has he not the same natural right to think and act and contract for himself? Is it possible for a man to have a natural right to make a slave of himself or of his posterity? Can a father supersede the laws of nature? What man is or ever was born free if every man is not?

      "We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness." Otis like may of the writers of the period all stress the ideas of freedom and liberty which form a key part of the declaration of independence.

    2. No. Nor on force? No. Nor on compact? Nor property? Not altogether on either. Has it any solid foundation, any chief cornerstone but what accident, chance, or confusion may lay one moment and destroy the next? I think it has an everlasting foundation in the unchangeable will of GOD, the author of nature, whose laws never vary. The same omniscient, omnipotent, infinitely good and gracious Creator of the universe who has been pleased to make it necessary that what we call matter should gravitate for the celestial bodies to roll round their axes, dance their orbits, and perform their various revolutions in that beautiful order and concert which we all admire has made it equally necessary that from Adam and Eve to these degenerate days the different sexes should sweetly attract each other, form societies of single families, of which larger bodies and communities are as naturally, mechanically, and necessarily combined as the dew of heaven and the soft distilling rain is collected by the all-enlivening heat of the sun. Government is therefore most evidently founded on the necessities of our nature. It

      I found this passage interesting given the contrast to what Otis views to be the reason why people enter political society compared to others we have read. Unlike Hobbes or Locke, whose theories take the form of rational actors choosing to enter into an agreement based primarily on self preservation and protection of property respectively, Otis contends that the formation of government is a natural phenomena that is a product of God's Will. Much like God willed gravity to govern the motion of celestial bodies, God willed that people enter into political society.

    3. A, B, and C, for example, make a democracy. Today A and B are for so vile a measure as a standing army. Tomorrow B and C vote it out. This is as really deposing the former administrators as setting up and making a new King is deposing the old one. Democracy in the one case and monarchy in the other still remain; all that is done is to change the administration.

      I find this quote quite intriguing because of the simplicity of it. Albeit, Otis probably made it simple on purpose, but it made me think. Otis thinks that any type of government is obliged by the same laws of nature and reason. Therefore, if an administration of any type of government deviates from truth, justice, and equity and goes towards tyranny, they are to be deposed. He then gives the example of disposing the administration of a simple democracy. What made this quote stand out to me was when I compared it to the political situation that we find ourselves in today. Does Otis not think that political parties will arise within a democracy? Thus, making his example much more complicated as tyranny to one party may mean justice to another. It seems to me that in a Democracy it can, sometimes, take a lot more than just a vote to depose its administration when thinking about political parties.

    1. an illusion of effective learning” (p. 1302), and learners may stop studying before lexical items are actually acquired, resulting in underlearning

      I had never heard of this concept before, but I feel like it would be important to make our students aware of this when we discuss study strategies with them. I think that it probably goes beyond vocabulary learning as well.

    1. his “clerk”

      As with the "girls" in "As We May Think," this terminology starts me thinking about actual clerks, the work they did, how it compares to what is described here, and what happened to them when (and if) systems like this eventually eliminated their jobs.

    1. With scientific claims, the only definitive answer is to reexamine the original research data and repeat the experiments and analysis. But no one has the time or the expertise to examine the original research literature on every topic, let alone repeat the research. As such, it is important to have some guidelines for deciding which theories are plausible enough to merit serious examination.

      "The superiority of Scientific Evidence Reexamined":

      "Allow me now to ask, Will he be so perfectly satisfied on the first trial as not to think it of importance to make a second, perhaps u third, and a fourth? Whence arises this diffidence'! Purely from the consciousness of the fallibility of his own faculties. But to what purpose, it may be said, the reiterations of the at-tempt, since it is impossible for him, by any efforts, to shake off his dependence on the accuracy of his attention and fidelity of his memory? Or, what can he have more than reiterated testimonies of his memory, in support of the truth of its for-mer testimony? I acknowledge, that after a hundred attempts he can have no more. But even this is a great deal. We learn from experience, that the mistakes or oversights committed by the mind in one operation. arc sometime!-., on a review, corrected on the second, or perhaps on a third. Besides, the repetition, when no error is discovered, enlivens the remembrance, and so strengthens the conviction. But, for this conviction. it is plain that we are in a great measure indebted to memory. and in some measure even to experience." (Campbell 922)

    1. We may distinguish three kinds, or degrees, of eloquence.

      See Campbell's breakdown of appealing to the passions. I think these strikingly similar hierarchies might be important for the conviction/persuasion distinction made on page 970 (as pointed out by Nathaniel).

      It is not, however, every kind of pathos, which will give the orator so great an ascendancy over the minds of his hearers. All passions are not alike capable of producing this effect. Some are naturally inert and torpid; they deject the mind, and indispose it for enterprise . Of this kind are sorrow, fear, shame, humility. Others, on the contrary, elevate the soul, and stimulate to action. Such are hope, patriotism, ambition, emulation, anger. These, with the greatest facility, are made to concur in direction with arguments exciting to resolution and activity : and are, consequently , the fittest for producing what, for want of a better term in our language, I shall henceforth denominate the vehement. There is, besides, an intermediate kind of passions, which do not so congenially and directly either restrain us from acting, or incite us to act; but, by the art of the speaker, can, in an oblique manner, be made conducive to either. Such are joy, love, esteem, compassion. Nevertheless, all these kinds may find a place in suasory discourses, or such as are intended to operate on the will. The first is properest for, dissuading; the second, as hath been already hinted, for persuad- ing; the third is equally accommodated to both. (904)

    1. Almost every human behaviour, from shopping to marriage to expressions of feelings, is learned. In Canada, people tend to view marriage as a choice between two people, based on mutual feelings of love. In other nations and in other times, marriages have been arranged through an intricate process of interviews and negotiations between entire families, or in other cases, through a direct system such as a “mail order bride.” To someone raised in Winnipeg, the marriage customs of a family from Nigeria may seem strange, or even wrong. Conversely, someone from a traditional Kolkata family might be perplexed with the idea of romantic love as the foundation for the lifelong commitment of marriage. In other words, the way in which people view marriage depends largely on what they have been taught.

      I agree with this paragraph partly. Yes, it is true that every community, country or nation has its own cultural traditions and beliefs; and they should be respected. When we are talking about harmless different marriage traditions, I think, we can apply the philosophy of this paragraph. However, what about cruel and life threatening cultural traditions existing across the world, they are taught or not!

    1. when you don’t know how much things have changed, you don’t see that they are changing or that they can change.

      Reminds me of ourselves. We don't notice the changes in ourselves as we get older, because it's a gradual change. Then when you really think about it, certain memories seem to have happened longer ago than the last time you reveled that memory. People may say "you've changed" and you may not see it in yourself right away.

    1. We therefore contend that academic research practices need to be connected to students’ existing practices rather than set up as wholly separate from (and better than) them.

      Students may know more than they think they do... let's change that. Student DO know more than they think they do.

    1. Man, as a physical being, is, like other bodies, governed by invariable laws. As an intelligent being, he incessantly transgresses the laws established by God, and changes those of his own instituting. He is left to his private direction, though a limited being, and subject, like all finite intelligences, to ignorance and error: even his imperfect knowledge he loseth; and, as a sensible creature, he is hurried away by a thousand impetuous passions. Such a being might every instant forget his Creator; God has therefore reminded him of his duty by the laws of religion.

      When I've been reading about God establishing the basis of laws, essentially, I begin thinking a lot about what these connections may mean looking back at what we've already read by Locke -- and a few other authors -- and what it all might mean going forward in our next readings. In essence, I'm curious to see the impact that Montesquieu's reflections of the evolution of law have on the founding fathers as they progressed through the structuring of our American government. In a more modern sense, we hear a lot about the separation between church and state, etc. -- and I think quotes like this invite us to explore some of the impacts of God's law/religious law/natural law on the formation of what sparked the American revolution and how it was carried out.

    1. And that’s the difference between reading “As We May Think” on my own, and working through it in this community, this network of fellow learners

      An open and connected community of learners, making for richer, more resonant learning, in my view. It has certainly enriched my own understanding and appreciation of the text by Vannaver Bush!

    1. Presumably man's spirit should be elevated if he can better review his shady past and analyze more completely and objectively his present problems

      I like the multiple meanings one can find in "spirit should be elevated." Not just happier, but better as people.

    2. Trip hammers
    3. if the scholar can get at only one a week by diligent search, his syntheses are not likely to keep up with the current scene

      Here, directional velocity gives way to processing speed, scholarly productivity and currency (in the dual sense of "nowness" and relevance/pertinency).

    4. A new symbolism, probably positional, must apparently precede the reduction of mathematical transformations to machine processes
      1. Mathematics can be used to describe and calculate quantity/scale, position or probability; it makes sense to map this "new symbolism" onto one of those dimensions.
      2. This reminds one of a passage from Richard Powers The Gold Bug Variations (1991) where he reminds us that a sufficiently precise placement and measurement of a notch on a rod would be able to encode and decode the Encyclopedia Britannica, indeed, the full holdings of the Library of Congress.
      3. Let us remember that the nearly instantaneous calculations of the computers we use today have limits in terms of the numbers of digits that may be processed at any one time; for that reason, the kind of highly compressed mathematical encoding that Powers envisioned is virtually impossible for us in the early 21st century.
    5. The Encyclopoedia Britannica could be reduced to the volume of a matchbox

      ... a matchbox or a USB thumb drive or a flat smart media card or a minuscule microchip or even a non-substantial set of information on a server on the cloud somewhere that can be streamed almost instantly anywhere in the world. In one sense, 21st-century digital "compression" leads not to density, but to dispersion and to widespread, easy access through ubiquitous devices and software tools.

    6. His hands are free, and he is not anchored

      Again: Google Glass?

    7. Books of all sorts, pictures, current periodicals, newspapers, are thus obtained and dropped into place

      Kindle? IBooks? a connected tablet? These are the desk, the future device in a different guise.

    8. Man cannot hope fully to duplicate this mental process artificially, but he certainly ought to be able to learn from it

      Tagging mechanisms and other such tools bridge the gap between organic neuro-processed association as a kind of index and "mechanical" indexing. Basically, human brains imprint the digital archive with some traces of their own organic associations. Not exactly a reproduction of the organic process, but creating a bridge between the organic "pulling together" of disparate elements and mechanical indexing.

    9. Such machines will have enormous appetites

      Interesting image -- the machine is portrayed as actually desiring/needing data, rather than simply being capable of processing it. This feels somewhat true to the growth of Big Data today: once the system/capabilities are in place, the desire to collect data -- perhaps more data than we can really use, at least responsibly/ethically -- seems to grow.

    10. talk directly to the record?

      In this case, what happens to the "process of digestion and correction" which follows "the first stage"? In some ways, we do now have something like this: many more records of the early stages of thinking (including these annotations), in addition to or instead of records of the later stages, after an author has done more "digesting" of his/her thoughts, and published them in a more orderly way. There's a lot to be said for this sort of "thinking in the open," but it also adds exponentially to the "record," which Bush is already finding overwhelming in size.

    11. But there are signs of a change as new and powerful instrumentalities come into use.

      On first reading, this seemed like a very odd transition, from talking about new ways to navigate the ever-proliferating piles/sea of data, to talking about instruments that seem more likely to add to the piles than to organize it. It takes some time for him to come back to how photography can help solve the problem. If this were a student paper, I'd probably be telling him to move his thesis/solution closer to the beginning, so readers don't lose it in the mass of his own accumulated examples of technological progress.

    12. remember

      The limits of memory are/is a key theme throughout. As I write below, I'm not sure he always distinguishes as well as he might between "memory" as in retrieving information that one remembers exists, but of which one can't remember the details and "memory" as in remembering that the information exists in the first place.

    13. healthily

      This is an interesting choice of words, and echoes, though it does not directly repeat, some of his optimism at the beginning. I found myself thinking about Rachel Carson and others who exposed the results of the "better living through chemistry" (and other forms of science) optimism of the post-WWII era.

    14. with some assurance that he can find them again if they prove important

      I found myself checking Bush's age at time of writing when I read this: c. 55. As a fellow middle-aged person, I can sympathize with his desire, but am inclined to point out that the problem is not just finding something that might be useful, but remembering that it exists in the first place (I guess the "trails" might help with that, assuming one remembers one made a trail, or has a way of stumbling across it).

    15. The inheritance from the master becomes, not only his additions to the world's record, but for his disciples the entire scaffolding by which they were erected.

      I've been noticing throughout that his attitude toward the existing "record" is essentially conservative/trusting. There's little suggestion that the role of the present generation of researchers might be to question or even overturn it, and no attention to social/cultural forces that might have shaped what it does and doesn't contain.

    16. sets a reproducer in action, photographs the whole trail out, and passes it to his friend for insertion in his own memex

      One major difference between the memex as envisioned here and most web-based systems is that each individual who has a memex (which presumably isn't everyone; they sound expensive) has his (or her?) own memex. To use the trail metaphor, everyone has his own network of trails on his own island, and while it's possible to reproduce a network of trails from someone else's island on one's own island, the two sets of trails don't really connect (nor does there seem to be a chance for serendipitous connections made by people who don't know each other already).

    17. On deflecting one of these levers to the right he runs through the book before him, each page in turn being projected at a speed which just allows a recognizing glance at each.

      I'm having flashbacks to using microfilm readers (and to the headaches induced by trying to read while scrolling just slowly enough to scan headlines). No question that it was amazing technology in many ways, but the thought of spending most of one's day working in that environment; ugh.

    18. Thus far we seem to be worse off than before—for we can enormously extend the record; yet even in its present bulk we can hardly consult it.

      Back the central question/problem (from which we seem to have strayed for quite some time, mostly as the result of his enthusiasm for all the new ways of gathering/manipulating/processing data he sees on the horizon)

    19. Much needs to occur, however, between the collection of data and observations, the extraction of parallel material from the existing record, and the final insertion of new material into the general body of the common record. For mature thought there is no mechanical substitute. But creative thought

      And here I think he's going to address the importance of selection (and he does, a bit), but instead he's mostly focusing on the process of bringing in yet more "material," this time from "the existing record."

    20. As he ponders over his notes in the evening, he again talks his comments into the record.

      There's a very important element that I think is assumed here, and that requires considerable mental labor (and some practice with using the tools described): selection. If the notes and photographs are to be useful, they can't be a stream-of-consciousness recording of everything encountered, observed, or thought that day. Otherwise, the "pondering" would take as long as the day itself.

      And presumably the process of "talk[ing] comments into the record" involves yet more selection. That's a natural part of the process of research and writing, but one thing I think we've learned as tools of this sort become widely available is that the temptation to record everything is strong (scholars are not immune to the same impulses experienced by students with highlighters), and the result is a postponement of the difficult task of selecting what's important to a later date (or sometimes never).

    21. is retyped

      Another obfuscation-of-labor moment in the passive here? Who does the retyping, and just how much correction, interpretation, etc. is required (cf. what happens when you run OCR: the result is not usually a text clean enough for markup without some fixing by well-educated humans, often located in low(er)-wage countries such as India).

    22. disquieting gaze

      This is interesting. Perhaps a recognition that the "girl" is more mentally present/engaged than she seems? There's some tension between languid and disquieting.#openlearning17

    23. Must we always transform to mechanical movements in order to proceed from one electrical phenomenon to another?

      Abstractly worded, but this remains an enduring question about technology and innovation. Albeit with a more critical sensibility than Bush carries in this essay.

    24. more directly?
    25. delight

      I love that pleasure is foregrounded as part of this process.

    26. amplified

      Amplification is an interesting trope in Bush's essay and tech talk in general. It's less about speed than visibility. Certainly works for annotation:

      Online, a book can be a gathering place, a shared space where readers record their reactions and conversations. Those interactions ultimately become part of the book too, a kind of amplified marginalia.

      - Jennifer Howard, Chronicle of Higher Education

    27. Thus he builds a trail of his interest through the maze of materials available to him.

      I love the image of a trail through a maze.

    28. specialization

      Though clearly, Bush is situated squarely within a capitalist context, I'm reading Marx in here against the grain in terms of specialization and the loss of holistic sense of labor. Could increased access to knowledge counter that trend in capitalism?

    29. advanced photography which can record what is seen or even what is not

      I realize this isn't contemporary but Bush's allusion to photography revealing the unseen made me think of this early meme:

    30. All else he should be able to turn over to his mechanism,

      3 cheers for automation!

    31. the prosaic problem of the great department store

      "Disrupted" by Amazon.

    32. It is exactly as though the physical items had been gathered together from widely separated sources and bound together to form a new book.

      I love this idea of pastiche at the core of the memex.

    33. he names it,

      Bush is usually credited with conceiving of hyperlinks, right? But isn't he really talking about tagging?

    34. It consists of a desk,

    35. may yet be mechanized

      Is mechanized different from automated? I'd agree that these associations can be more rapidly and frequently induced. I don't think they can be automated. It's still going to require idiosyncratic human labor.

    36. With one item in its grasp, it snaps instantly to the next that is suggested by the association of thoughts, in accordance with some intricate web of trails carried by the cells of the brain.

      Gardner, is this "insight"?

    37. the artificiality of systems of indexing.

      So organic catalogging, "intuitive" design? Aren't these always in the eye of the beholder?

    38. The real heart of the matter of selection,

      Ironically, the selection of the entire next two paragraphs is something we should not allow in hypothes.is. Let's limit word or character count for targets.

    39. halting

      Acceleration is a key trope for Bush. It's largely about speed. When I think of some of the same technologies that he is imagining, however, its more about direction--to keep in in the realm of physics...

    40. The prime action of use is selection,

      In annotation too.

    41. whenever thought for a time runs along an accepted groove

      It's interesting that the groove is the basic unit of computation for Bush...

    42. The cord

      Quaint.

  7. Jan 2017
    1. wisdom of race experience

      I find it interesting that though Bush opens and closes his article with a comment about race, no one has annotated them. Is the ideology of race just as normal today as it was seventy years ago? I guess UNESCO's Statements on Race have had no lasting effect in the US.

    2. the life of a race rather than that of an individual.

      I find it interesting that though Bush opens and closes his article with a comment about race, no one has annotated them. Is the ideology of race just as normal today as it was seventy years ago? I guess UNESCO's Statements on Race have had no lasting effect in the US.

    3. the application of science to the needs and desires of man

      An interesting follow up is 'The Hut Where the Internet Began." "When Douglas Engelbart read a Vannevar Bush essay on a Philippine island in the aftermath of World War II, he found the conceptual space to imagine what would become our Internet." http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/07/the-hut-where-the-internet-began/277551/

    4. They have enabled him to throw masses of people against one another with cruel weapons.

      Interesting sentiment coming from the founder of Raytheon, one of the largest producers of weapons of mass destruction in the world.

    5. The inheritance from the master

      GIGO

    6. tying two items together is the important thing

      A semantic web?

    7. the most fastidious connoisseur of the present artifacts of civilization.

      We fastidious connoisseurs can join the geek and nerds at the Computer Museum in Menlo Park California. They have an IBM 360 just like the one on which I learned to program. See Hollerith punched-card machine above. http://www.computerhistory.org/visit/

    8. The world has arrived at an age of cheap complex devices of great reliability; and something is bound to come of it.

      We now know that who decides what gets produced is the most important factor of what we can buy cheaply. That's a political question.

    9. facsimile transmission

      The only institution I deal with that requires facsimile transmissions is my college.

    10. punched-card machine long ago produced by Hollorith for the purposes of the census

      Raise your hand if you've used punch cards to program a computer!

    11. physicists promptly constructed thermionic-tube equipment

      hahahahaha Physicists don't construct vacuum tubes (valves in the UK) for research, glassblowers do! Just another case of workers being edited out of the academic record. We even have our own revisionist label: Invisible Assistant. Patronizing much?

    12. produces in a short time a list of all employees who live in Trenton and know Spanish

      Or a list of Muslims that have traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

    13. The lawyer has at his touch the associated opinions and decisions of his whole experience

      Now we have link rot. 49 percent of the hyperlinks in Supreme Court decisions no longer work.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/us/politics/in-supreme-court-opinions-clicks-that-lead-nowhere.html?_r=0

    14. truly significant attainments become lost in the mass of the inconsequential.

      This problem has only accelerated and is exacerbated by knowledge being locked away by copyrights and professional journals. Knowledge financed with public monies should be publicly available for review.

    15. occupied a master craftsman of the guild for months

      Dr. Bush should have visited the glassblowers in the basement of any good lab. They were making prototype tubes in a few hours with the help of the glassblowing lathe invented in Redwood City, California, by Charlie Litton.

    16. For mature thought there is no mechanical substitute

      Yes! Let's highlight this...no technology can substitute for the cognitional acts that produce understanding and insight. Technological affordances may contribute to the conditions for the possibility of insight, but they never replace the intelligence that grasps a unifying idea in a set of particular and otherwise randomly associated data.

    17. Britannica

      I wonder if Bush could have foreseen, not just that the traditional stores of records would become astoundingly more accessible, but that technologies would enable new forms of building such records based on opening the processes of knowledge production and editing...here I am thinking of the comparison of the Britannica with Wikipedia, and those analyses that regard them as comparably authoritative sources of knowledge

    18. Might not these currents be intercepted

      "Might the woman's body not be transformed into a useful machine"?

    19. her fingers

      Of course.

    20. new forms of encyclopedias

      Wikipedia obviously.

    21. the head of the trail

      Interesting that, even trails are rhizomatic, complex, networked things, Bush still conceives of them and their re-use indexically.

    22. Poulsen long ago put speech on a magnetic wire.
    23. grew like Topsy

      The origin of this expression is Uncle Tom's Cabin: http://cjewords.blogspot.com/2009/08/growd-like-topsy.html

    24. A mathematician is not a man who can readily manipulate figures; often he cannot

      Again, because computation is trivial, mechanical, etc., let these women do it so that the men can free their brains for something more than repetitive detailed transformations:

      http://boingboing.net/2011/02/09/women-computers-of-w.html

    25. His hands are free, and he is not anchored

      And he is a man.

    26. Combine these two elements, let the Vocoder run the stenotype, and the result is a machine which types when talked to.

      So in this example and in others throughout the piece, a machine takes over a job formerly done by a "girl". This is similar to other examples where digital labor is feminized in subtle and (now) increasingly invisible and insidious ways. In other words, stenography is characterized as a field worth replacing because it is just a woman's job. The researcher at his desk remains essential because of course he is.

    27. A girl strokes its keys languidly

      "languidly" geez

    28. someone may speed it up

      Shake it like a Polaroid picture.

    29. The camera hound of the future wears on his forehead a lump a little larger than a walnut.

      Because this version of the essay doesn't seem to include the illustrations:

    30. Certainly progress in photography is not going to stop.

      Ever.

    31. The world has arrived at an age of cheap complex devices of great reliability; and something is bound to come of it

      There is great optimism in this assumption. I don't know if I feel quite so positive about where we are today with cheaper and more complex devices.

    32. the means we use for threading through the consequent maze to the momentarily important item

      Interesting how he's already figuring knowledge as a maze, foreshadowing what's to come later in this essay.

    33. The world has arrived at an age of cheap complex devices of great reliability; and something is bound to come of it.

      It seems that we live in a world that we focus on mass production of products versus the authenticity and quality of ones inventions.

    34. Is it not possible that some day the path may be established more directly?

      Is this our introduction to VR?

    35. just as though he had the physical page before him

      I don't know where I would be without my tablet being able to annotate files, articles, and pdfs.

    36. Take the prosaic problem of the great department store. Every time a charge sale is made, there are a number of things to be done. The inventory needs to be revised, the salesman needs to be given credit for the sale, the general accounts need an entry, and, most important, the customer needs to be charged.

      I can't even imagine working retail without the technology. We barey keep the stores together with the tech we have now!

    37. It is a far cry from the abacus to the modern keyboard accounting machine. It will be an equal step to the arithmetical machine of the future

      From the abacus to the modern keybaord accounting machine, to the smart phone with the scientific calculator.

    38. delegated to a series of machines, and the cards then transferred bodily from one to another.

      How old school, to have more than one machine, and then have to physically take the info from one to the other.

    39. It is strange that the inventors of universal languages have not seized upon the idea of producing one which better fitted the technique for transmitting and recording speech

      Could binary be considered a Universal language between computers, which could be considered better fitted for transmitting and recording speech?

    40. A scene itself can be just as well looked over line by line by the photocell in this way as can a photograph of the scene.

      This made me think of 3D printing because that is done bit by bit, but comes together to create the whole object. Fascinating to see this translated back in time to photography.

    41. Had a Pharaoh been given detailed and explicit designs of an automobile, and had he understood them completely, it would have taxed the resources of his kingdom to have fashioned the thousands of parts for a single car, and that car would have broken down on the first trip to Giza.

      I thought this was a really interesting evaluation on what exactly progression and evolution is. I never really thought about the ideas that people constantly have and the means that we all have to execution. We always think about the future and what that technology is or could be, but we don't ever talk about it in relation to the past. It made me think what if we sent modern ways that we read (like that book that you showed us) back in time, how would they react to that?

    42. Logic can become enormously difficult, and it would undoubtedly be well to produce more assurance in its use. The machines for higher analysis have usually been equation solvers. Ideas are beginning to appear for equation transformers, which will rearrange the relationship expressed by an equation in accordance with strict and rather advanced logic. Progress is inhibited by the exceedingly crude way in which mathematicians express their relationships.

      The author is pointing out how the idea of logic can be a hindrance when analyzing and sharing data. referencing that of mathematicians who are deemed inadequate simply due to the way they express themselves. All very true but very different to take into consideration when reading this work.

    1. Power is like fire; it warms, scorches, or destroys, according as it is watched, provoked, or increased. It is as dangerous as useful. Its only rule is the good of the people; but because it is apt to break its bounds, in all good governments nothing, or as little as may be, ought to be left to chance, or the humours of men in authority: All should proceed by fixed and stated rules, and upon any emergency, new rules should be made. This is the constitution, and this the happiness of Englishmen; as hath been formerly shewn at large in these letters.

      I think the approach to power is quite interesting. Very similar to Locke, the basis of power lies within the people and the people can use this to either benefit or it will destroy society. This is a very realistic approach to power, and there is a recognition and appreciation that allows people to have the power to control the state and that many others are not as lucky. This topic of discussion specifically shows the progressivism on the idea of power. Last week we read about how power should be kept within an individual, and this occurs not long after stating an appreciation for how power is held within the people and always should be held by the people.

    1. Share on facebook45KShare on twitter Share on reddit1Share on linkedin901 Credit: N.Hendrickson / iStockphoto How to read a scientific paper By Adam RubenJan. 20, 2016 , 3:15 PM Nothing makes you feel stupid quite like reading a scientific journal article. I remember my first experience with these ultra-congested and aggressively bland manuscripts so dense that scientists are sometimes caught eating them to stay regular. I was in college taking a seminar course in which we had to read and discuss a new paper each week. And something just wasn’t working for me. Every week I would sit with the article, read every single sentence, and then discover that I hadn’t learned a single thing. I’d attend class armed with exactly one piece of knowledge: I knew I had read the paper. The instructor would ask a question; I’d have no idea what she was asking. She’d ask a simpler question—still no idea. But I’d read the damn paper! It reminded me of kindergarten, when I would feel proud after reading a book above my grade level. But if you had asked me a simple question about the book’s contents—What kind of animal is Wilbur? How did Encyclopedia Brown know that Bugs Meany wasn’t really birdwatching?—I couldn’t have answered it. A few weeks into the seminar, I decided enough was enough. I wasn’t going to read another paper without understanding it. So I took that week’s journal article to the library. Not just the regular library, but the obscure little biology library, one of those dusty academic hidey-holes only populated by the most wretched forms of life, which are, of course, insects and postdocs. I placed the paper on a large empty desk. I eliminated all other distractions. To avoid interruptions from friends encouraging alcohol consumption, as friends do in college, I sat in an obscure anteroom with no foot traffic. To avoid interruptions from cellphone calls, I made sure it was 1999. Most importantly, if I didn’t understand a word in a sentence, I forbade myself from proceeding to the next sentence until I looked it up in a textbook and then reread the sentence until it made sense. I specifically remember this happening with the word “exogenous.” Somehow I had always glossed over this word, as though it was probably unimportant to its sentence. Wrong. It took me more than 2 hours to read a three-page paper. But this time, I actually understood it. And I thought, “Wow. I get it. I really get it.” And I thought, “Oh crap. I’m going to have to do this again, aren’t I?” Every week I would sit with the article, read every single sentence, and then discover that I hadn’t learned a single thing. If you’re at the beginning of your career in science, you may be struggling with the same problem. It may help you to familiarize yourself with the 10 Stages of Reading a Scientific Paper: 1. Optimism. “This can’t be too difficult,” you tell yourself with a smile—in the same way you tell yourself, “It’s not damaging to drink eight cups of coffee a day” or “There are plenty of tenure-track jobs.” After all, you’ve been reading words for decades. And that’s all a scientific paper is, right? Words? 2. Fear. This is the stage when you realize, “Uh … I don’t think all of these are words.” So you slow down a little. Sound out the syllables, parse the jargon, look up the acronyms, and review your work several times. Congratulations: You have now read the title. 3. Regret. You begin to realize that you should have budgeted much more time for this whole undertaking. Why, oh why, did you think you could read the article in a single bus ride? If only you had more time. If only you had one of those buzzer buttons from workplaces in the 1960s, and you could just press it and say, “Phoebe, cancel my January.” If only there was a compact version of the same article, something on the order of 250 or fewer words, printed in bold at the beginning of the paper… 4. Corner-cutting. Why, what’s this? An abstract, all for me? Blessed be the editors of scientific journals who knew that no article is comprehensible, so they asked their writers to provide, à la Spaceballs, “the short, short version.” Okay. Let’s do this. 5. Bafflement. What the hell? Was that abstract supposed to explain something? Why was the average sentence 40 words long? Why were there so many acronyms? Why did the authors use the word “characterize” five times? 6. Distraction. What if there was, like, a smartphone for ducks? How would that work? What would they use it for? And what was that Paul Simon lyric, the one from “You Can Call Me Al,” that’s been in your head all day? How would your life change if you owned a bread maker? You’d have to buy yeast. Is yeast expensive? You could make your own bread every few days, but then it might go stale. It’s not the same as store-bought bread; it’s just not. Oh, right! “Don’t want to end up a cartoon in a cartoon graveyard.” Is Paul Simon still alive? You should check Wikipedia. Sometimes you confuse him with Paul McCartney or Paul Shaffer. Shame about David Bowie. Can you put coffee in a humidifier? 7. Realization that 15 minutes have gone by and you haven’t progressed to the next sentence. 8. Determination. All righty. Really gonna read this time. Really gonna do it. Yup, yuppers, yup-a-roo, readin’ words is what you do. Let’s just point those pupils at the dried ink on the page, and … 9. Rage. HOW COULD ANY HUMAN BRAIN PRODUCE SUCH SENTENCES? 10. Genuine contemplation of a career in the humanities. Academic papers written on nonscientific subjects are easy to understand, right? Right? What a strange document a scientific journal article is. We work on them for months or even years. We write them in a highly specialized vernacular that even most other scientists don’t share. We place them behind a paywall and charge something ridiculous, like $34.95, for the privilege of reading them. We so readily accept their inaccessibility that we have to start “journal clubs” in the hopes that our friends might understand them and summarize them for us. Can you imagine if mainstream magazine articles were like science papers? Picture a Time cover story with 48 authors. Or a piece in The Economist that required, after every object described, a parenthetical listing of the company that produced the object and the city where that company is based. Or a People editorial about Jimmy Kimmel that could only be published following a rigorous review process by experts in the field of Jimmy Kimmel. Do you know what you’d call a magazine article that required intellectual scrutiny and uninterrupted neural commitment to figure out what it’s even trying to say? You’d call it a badly written article. So for those new to reading journals, welcom

      In time journal reading became easier and I understood the topic. At times I would read journals on a class subject just to know more about the subject.

    1. And if we may not suppose men ever to have been in the state of nature, because we hear not much of them in such a state, we may as well suppose the armies of Salmanasser or Xerxes were never children, because we hear little of them, till they were men, and imbodied in armies.

      I thought this analogy was very interesting. Locke addresses those who think that because there is no documentation of people coming together to form government, it may not have happened that way. His response is an argument from analogy. Even if we have never heard of a soldier's childhood, it doesn't mean they didn't have one (they obviously did). To the same extent, even if we have never heard of people coming together in the state of nature to form a government, it doesn't mean that it didn't occur that way.

    1. This claim is not accurate, although ambiguous terminology allows ITER representatives to claim that the reactor will produce 500 million Watts of “fusion power.”

      In other words, when the words are defined as used, it's accurate as to design intention. Anyone presenting a research goal as if it were a fact is being misleading. Krivit is here contradicting himself. "Ambiguous terminology allows the representatives to claim ..." means that the claim is a representation of truth, with the words defined as used. Where is the ambiguity? I have known the claim for years, and never interpreted it as Krivit seems to think the "public" interprets it. People who think shallowly, which is common, might indeed interpret it incorrectly, from the brief statements that Krivit cites. But fusion power means power produced from fusion, and it is not ambiguous at all. Only someone who interprets it as "net power generation" -- which isn't claimed -- would be confused. Further, the real issue is always, in the end, energy generation, peak power is irrelevant unless we know for how long such power is generated. Generating high peak power is not terribly difficult. What is difficult is generating significant power, continuously, for extended periods of time. Krivit doesn't seem to realize the importance of time, and he misses other aspects of these issues, I think we will see.

      "Have led" implies, though it does not state, that the misinformation is deliberate. The idea is that this was done to increase support, to maintain or increase funding. I doubt it, and I doubt that any serious decision-maker has been misled on this point. Rather, the strong points of JET and ITER have been communicated, and JET, in particular, set records for "fusion power," which has almost nothing to do with "net power," i.e, power produced in excess of the power consumption of the entire facility (which is an arbitrary measure, because any power produced is "net"). As has been pointed out, the former is electrical power, from the grid, whereas the latter is heating power, almost entirely, but it is not clear to me at this point exactly how it was measured, it may have, instead, been calculated from measures of the reaction rate, because the reaction is well-understood. The record rates were with D-T fusion, which is easier than ordinary D-D fusion.

      Probably because Krivit's understanding of power and energy is poor, and also resulting for his search for a dramatic story, "lies!" being dramatic, Krivit apparently does not know the questions to ask to truly understand what is going on. Instead he seizes on what is said whenever it seems to confirm his "story."

      It is a crucial part of Krivit's story what the "public" believes. What public? Wikipedia is edited by the public, and I don't see that the misconception Krivit imagines as being widespread is reflected in the relevant articles.

    1. 0 Research Article Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Open Science Collaboration*,†+ Author Affiliations*All authors with their affiliations appear at the end of this paper.↵†Corresponding author. E-mail: nosek@virginia.edu Science  28 Aug 2015:Vol. 349, Issue 6251, DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716 All authors with their affiliations appear at the end of this paper. Article Figures & Data Info & Metrics eLetters PDF Empirically analyzing empirical evidenceOne of the central goals in any scientific endeavor is to understand causality. Experiments that seek to demonstrate a cause/effect relation most often manipulate the postulated causal factor. Aarts et al. describe the replication of 100 experiments reported in papers published in 2008 in three high-ranking psychology journals. Assessing whether the replication and the original experiment yielded the same result according to several criteria, they find that about one-third to one-half of the original findings were also observed in the replication study.Science, this issue 10.1126/science.aac4716Structured AbstractINTRODUCTIONReproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. Scientific claims should not gain credence because of the status or authority of their originator but by the replicability of their supporting evidence. Even research of exemplary quality may have irreproducible empirical findings because of random or systematic error.RATIONALEThere is concern about the rate and predictors of reproducibility, but limited evidence. Potentially problematic practices include selective reporting, selective analysis, and insufficient specification of the conditions necessary or sufficient to obtain the results. Direct replication is the attempt to recreate the conditions believed sufficient for obtaining a previously observed finding and is the means of establishing reproducibility of a finding with new data. We conducted a large-scale, collaborative effort to obtain an initial estimate of the reproducibility of psychological science.RESULTSWe conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. There is no single standard for evaluating replication success. Here, we evaluated reproducibility using significance and P values, effect sizes, subjective assessments of replication teams, and meta-analysis of effect sizes. The mean effect size (r) of the replication effects (Mr = 0.197, SD = 0.257) was half the magnitude of the mean effect size of the original effects (Mr = 0.403, SD = 0.188), representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had significant results (P < .05). Thirty-six percent of replications had significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.CONCLUSIONNo single indicator sufficiently describes replication success, and the five indicators examined here are not the only ways to evaluate reproducibility. Nonetheless, collectively these results offer a clear conclusion: A large portion of replications produced weaker evidence for the original findings despite using materials provided by the original authors, review in advance for methodological fidelity, and high statistical power to detect the original effect sizes. Moreover, correlational evidence is consistent with the conclusion that variation in the strength of initial evidence (such as original P value) was more predictive of replication success than variation in the characteristics of the teams conducting the research (such as experience and expertise). The latter factors certainly can influence replication success, but they did not appear to do so here.Reproducibility is not well understood because the incentives for individual scientists prioritize novelty over replication. Innovation is the engine of discovery and is vital for a productive, effective scientific enterprise. However, innovative ideas become old news fast. Journal reviewers and editors may dismiss a new test of a published idea as unoriginal. The claim that “we already know this” belies the uncertainty of scientific evidence. Innovation points out paths that are possible; replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both. Replication can increase certainty when findings are reproduced and promote innovation when they are not. This project provides accumulating evidence for many findings in psychological research and suggests that there is still more work to do to verify whether we know what we think we know. <img class="fragment-image" src="https://d2ufo47lrtsv5s.cloudfront.net/content/sci/349/6251/aac4716/F1.medium.gif"/> Download high-res image Open in new tab Download Powerpoint Original study effect size versus replication effect size (correlation coefficients).Diagonal line represents replication effect size equal to original effect size. Dotted line represents replication effect size of 0. Points below the dotted line were effects in the opposite direction of the original. Density plots are separated by significant (blue) and nonsignificant (red) effects. AbstractReproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.Reproducibility is a core principle of scientific progress (1–6). Scientific claims should not gain credence because of the status or authority of their originator but by the replicability of their supporting evidence. Scientists attempt to transparently describe the methodology and resulting evidence used to support their claims. Other scientists agree or disagree whether the evidence supports the claims, citing theoretical or methodological reasons or by collecting new evidence. Such debates are meaningless, however, if the evidence being debated is not reproducible.Even research of exemplary quality may have irreproducible empirical findings because of random or systematic error. Direct replication is the attempt to recreate the conditions believed sufficient for obtaining a previously observed finding (7, 8) and is the means of establishing reproducibility of a finding with new data. A direct replication may not obtain the original result for a variety of reasons: Known or unknown differences between the replication and original study may moderate the size of an observed effect, the original result could have been a false positive, or the replication could produce a false negative. False positives and false negatives provide misleading information about effects, and failure to identify the necessary and sufficient conditions to reproduce a finding indicates an incomplete theoretical understanding. Direct replication provides the opportunity to assess and improve reproducibility.There is plenty of concern (9–13) about the rate and predictors of reproducibility but limited evidence. In a theoretical analysis, Ioannidis estimated that publishing and analytic practices make it likely that more than half of research results are false and therefore irreproducible (9). Some empirical evidence supports this analysis. In cell biology, two industrial laboratories reported success replicating the original results of landmark findings in only 11 and 25% of the attempted cases, respectively (10, 11). These numbers are stunning but also difficult to interpret because no details are available about the studies, methodology, or results. With no transparency, the reasons for low reproducibility cannot be evaluated.Other investigations point to practices and incentives that may inflate the likelihood of obtaining false-positive results in particular or irreproducible results more generally. Potentially problematic practices include selective reporting, selective analysis, and insufficient specification of the conditions necessary or sufficient to obtain the results (12–23). We were inspired to address the gap in direct empirical evidence about reproducibility. In this Research Article, we report a large-scale, collaborative effort to obtain an initial estimate of the reproducibility of psychological science.MethodStarting in November 2011, we constructed a protocol for selecting and conducting high-quality replications (24). Collaborators joined the project, selected a study for replication from the available studies in the sampling frame, and were guided through the replication protocol. The replication protocol articulated the process of selecting the study and key effect from the available articles, contacting the original authors for study materials, preparing a study protocol and analysis plan, obtaining review of the protocol by the original authors and other members within the present project, registering the protocol publicly, conducting the replication, writing the final report, and auditing the process and analysis for quality control. Project coordinators facilitated each step of the process and maintained the protocol and project resources. Replication materials and data were required to be archived publicly in order to maximize transparency, accountability, and reproducibility of the project (https://osf.io/ezcuj).

      Audience seems to be a range of people with experience/knowledge in this topic. Author uses words and abbreviations that would not make sense to the average viewer.

    1. the interface to Microsoft Word contains few deep principles about writing, and as a result it is possible to master Word's interface without becoming a passable writer. This isn't so much a criticism of Word, as it is a reflection of the fact that we have relatively few really strong and precise ideas about how to write well.

      "Write well" is complex, like "personality" (although OCEAN, haha, oops). I think especially of Karla's lament so beautifully expressed in Oceanic Mind. https://rampages.us/karlaimpala/2015/12/04/oceanic-mind/. Perhaps "strong" and "precise" are not mutually compatible here--the pairing may be misleading.

    1. visually imbued 'cultm;i-and social practices, which may vary from culture to culture and ep-�h to ep:h. So�;y;es these can be construed in grandiose terms, such as a massive sh

      "visually imbued cultural and social practices"--Jay's claim here states that cultural and social practices are dependent upon vision. While that's kind of a general claim (and he does give a few examples) we could think about what social or cultural practices (historical or contemporary0 this claim holds true for....

    1. Growth, or growing as developing, notonly physically but intellectually and morally, is one exemplification of the principle of continuity. The objection made is that growth might take many different directions: a man, for example, who starts out on a career of burglary may grow in that direction, and by practice may grow into a highly expert burglar. Hence it is argued that "growth" is not enough; we must also specify the direction in which growth takes place, the end towards which it tends. Before, however, we decide that the objection is conclusive we must analyze the case a little further. That a man may grow in efficiency as a burglar, as a gangster, or as a corrupt politician, cannot be doubted. But from the standpoint of growth as education and education as growth the question is whether growth in this direction promotes or retards growth in general. Does this formof growth create conditions for further growth, or does it set up conditions that shut offthe person who has grown in this particular direction from the occasions, stimuli, and opportunities for continuing growth in new directions? What is the effect of growth in a special direction upon the attitudes and habits which alone open up avenues for development in other lines? I shall leave you to answer these questions, saying simply that when and only when development in a particular line conduces to continuing growth does it answer to the criterion of education as growing. For the conception is one that must find universal and not specialized limited application. I return now tothe question of continuity as a criterion by which to discriminate between experiences which are educative and those which are mis-educative. As we have seen, there is some kind of continuity in any case since every experience affects for better or worse the attitudes which help decide the quality of further experiences, by setting up certain preference and aversion, and making it easier or harder to act for this or that end. Moreover, every experience influences in some degree the objective conditions under which further experiences are had. For example, a child who learns to speak has a new facility and new desire. But he has also widened the external conditions of subsequent learning. When he learns to read, he similarly opens up a new environment. If a person decides to become a teacher, lawyer, physician, or stock-broker, when he executes his intention he thereby necessarily determines to some extent the environment in which he will act in the future. He has rendered himself more sensitive and responsive to certain conditions, and relatively immune to those things about him that would have been stimuli if he had made another choice. But, while the principle of continuity applies in some way in every case, the quality of the present experience influencesthe wayin which the principle applies. We speak of spoiling a child and of the spoilt child. The effect of over-indulging a child is a continuing one. It sets up an attitudewhich operates as an automatic demand that persons and objects cater to his desires and caprices in the future. It makes him seek the kind of situation that will enable him to do what he feels like doing at the time. It renders him averse to and comparatively incompetent in situationswhich require effort and perseverance in overcoming obstacles. There is no paradox in the fact that the principle of the continuity of experience may operate so as to leave a person arrested on a lowplane of development, in a waywhich limits later capacity for growth. On the other hand, if an experience arouses curiosity, strengthens initiative, and sets up desires and purposes that are sufficiently intense to carry a person over dead places in the future, continuity works in a very different way. Every experience is a moving force. Its value can be judged only on the ground of what it moves toward and into. The greater maturity of experience which should belong to the adult as educator puts him in a position to evaluate each experience of the young in a way in which the one having the less mature experience cannot do. It is then the business of the educator to see in what direction an experience is heading. There is no point in his being more mature if, instead of using his greater insight to help organize the conditions of the experience of the immature, he throws away his insight. Failure to take the moving force of an experience into account so as to judge and direct it on the ground of what it is moving into means disloyalty 23 / 36 Enter Full Screen Exit Full Screen

      I really enjoy this particular paragraph. The example is very effective. Growth is not necessarily always good, although in many cases it is generally thought to be so. When someone says that they have "grown as a person", they generally mean that they think that they have developed more and become a better person. However, this is not always the case. In education, it is possible for one to gain experience, learn, and grow in exactly the wrong way, just like a man who starts out stealing and becomes a master burglar. In a similar way, someone can start out writing poorly and evolve from there to become an even bigger mess.

    1. It was a hopelessly clunky idea: a vision right out of a Library Science seminar circa 1949.

      Or The Atlantic, 1945.

      (Anderson's "marginalia strips" sound a lot like the "associative trails" that Vannevar Bush writes about.

    1. All soul is immortal, for she is the source of all motion both in herself and in others. Her form may be described in a figure as a composite nature made up of a charioteer and a pair of winged steeds

      I find this very interesting. It made me think of how this goddess can effect not only herself but others through her soul almost like how we talked about the bad apple affect doing the same thing.

    2. It might be so if madness were simply an evil; but there is also a madness which is a divine gift, and the source of the chiefest blessings granted to men

      Love it madness. It doesn’t make sense. it causes you to do things you wouldn't normally do. The things you do for love, you don’t do because they rationally make sense, you do them because they feel right. When viewed from the outside from a strictly rational perspective, one might think that person ought to be pitied for he fails to see reason. However love, and the ability to set reason aside to do what feels right may be the greatest gift we have as humans, for love may be the greatest thing one can experience. This love isn't just between a couple; it’s the same love we feel for our families, our friends, our pets, and for some people, God. To live your life strictly rationally and with no regard to love is to rob yourself of the greatest part of being human.

    1. Fourthly, that a Monarch cannot disagree with himselfe, out of envy, or interest; but an Assembly may; and that to such a height, as may produce a Civill Warre.

      This is an extremely interesting quote, given the fact that these are real possibilities that occurred later in American history. (To the extent that you take out any monarch factor and replace it with the fact that we have a representative-based system of the legislature.) I think this speaks to the variety of different perspectives and divisiveness that can occur in this type of government, whereas a monarchy doesn't have these sort of issues.

    1. drew his inspiration from academic culture, with its dense interweaving of cross-references and annotations

      Essential reading: Vannevar Bush's As We May Think (and the Hypothesis annotations layered atop this version of his essay are pretty great, too).

    1. “That is all Utopia,” cried John Pool, the humorist. “The animals, my dear Pollock, will not follow your chemical programme, but will continue to devour one another according to the mysterious laws of creation. The fly will always be the vulture of the microbe, the most harmless bird the eagle of the fly; the wolf will keep on presenting himself with legs of lamb, and the peaceful sheep will continue, as in the past, to be ‘the tiger of the grass.’ Let us follow the general law, and while awaiting our turn to be devoured, let us devour.”

      This passage attracted me attention because the entire story is a list of prophecies, but here it talks about the law of natural. It suggests that we should just follow the law and see what will happen. “The wolf will keep on presenting himself with legs of lamb.” On one hand, it means a bunch of new inventions will emerge and take up the old stuff, but on the other hand, it could also mean that the old basis is always there, because the wolf is still eating the lamb. Personally, I interpret it as that certain things/patterns would retains among the rapid change. The world wouldn’t be Utopia, which has the hidden connotation that the fantastic inventions may substitute many old stuff, but the “advanced” technology would not take up the entire world. People are moving forward, but sometimes they still look back, looking for basis. For instance, after digital camera has prevailed the society for decades, the old film camera again caught people’s attention. Many contemporary photographer has started reentering the dark room and developing films. Here is the law of natural that we have no power to control. The insertion of this paragraph shows a more rational point of view from John Pool. This view stands out among a series of provocative inventions, it forces people to think differently, and makes the story more readable.

    1. Interesting to see what some people think ‘open source’ is these days. Back when the OSI was created with the movement that wanted to call it ‘open source’ instead of ‘free software’, people said ‘don’t do that — it devalues the fundamental point’. And here we are 20 years later, with OSS being hugely well-used, but many of the contributors insisting that licences are irrelevant or just having available source is all that’s needed, or it’s all about the community. Well I guess those of us who though that the ‘Open Source’ naming was a bad plan are proved right about the downside. But of course we’ll never know if it would have been so successful if it had remained as ‘Free Software’ (I don’t see why not, because it’s the process and efficiency that has made it popular).

      This note is aligned with most of my comments on the open source depolitization of free software.

    1. bigger boys a special rule. In the very streetsthey were to keep their two hands within the folds of their coat; they were to walk in silence and without turning their heads to gaze, now here, now there, but rather to keep their eyes fixed upon the ground before them. And hereby it would seem to be proved conclusively that, even in the matter of quiet bearing and sobriety, the masculine type may claim greater strength than that which we attribute to the nature of women.

      I think teaching boys to behave a certain way in public is a strong discipline method. Keeping their eyes fixed on the ground could help them to stay focused without the need to look around and possibly get distracted. The fact that they may be stronger in this area than the nature of women is interesting. If the boys are learning to be dignified in a sense, and women are the same, would more people turn out this way? If the Spartan boys are keeping this mentality as they get older, then marry a woman and have children, would they raise their children as they were brought up?

    1. Harassment is seen as an inevitability for women on the internet, and, as with most awful nonsense, it’s even worse for women of color. I have the privilege of whiteness, but know the onslaught of misogynoir garbage Leslie Jones endured last summer was unique only in scope. If you’re a woman online with anything even remotely resembling an opinion, Twitter eggs will sniff you out like a shark hunting down the scent of blood. They’ll tell you that you deserve to be raped, or that no one would ever sleep with you, that you’re ridden with disease, wearing too much makeup, or not enough makeup, that you’re a whore with bad eyebrows. That… I don’t know, some period joke about the shark’s blood thing. Come get me, trolls, I’m bracing for impact. (Shout out to the orange egg who just messaged me, “Ho, ho, Hitler.”)AdvertisementI think about this too much, and that’s the problem. Online harassment is a theft of my time and energy — time and energy that could have been spent on anything else.The obvious solution seems like it would be not going online. You know, if every time you try to swim laps in a crocodile pit, a crocodile eats one of your limbs, maybe don’t swim in that crocodile pit, right? Except, I don’t know, what if swimming there is needed for your job? Twitter isn’t mandatory for writers, but it can be really important. It’s a gamified means of wasting time, but also a means of networking, while developing and establishing a distinct voice. I’ve gotten most of my work this year through connections built on Twitter. Telling women writers to “just not do that” is like suggesting a New York cab driver relocate to a state where everyone has cars and no one needs cabs. Women already have to stomach enough career disadvantages as it is. Let's think a little more critically about the way bullying exerts itself online. Many times, the targets are women who dare to be anything other than quiet and small. Of course, there are women who are trolls, especially of the celebrity variety, but the overwhelming majority of anonymous trolling takes on the defiant woman, who dares to speak her mind on any of the non-approved subjects.Of course, the ideological and practical have struggled to meet here. Twitter is still trying to wrap its head around basic empathy, despite there being various concrete solutions, and most employers seem to do little more than shrug off the evils of the world. I don’t know that we have to accept that as the way that it is. This isn’t a “men are bad and women are good” argument, though it certainly is gendered. Overall, what if all of us banded together to say, hey, I don’t want to live in a world where people conspire to harass a female writer “until she has a breakdown or goes into porn”? That’s a real thing I saw about myself, by the way.The funny thing is, this argument has been centralized around willful obligation. Women writers and the willful obligation of refusing to give up on an asset to their work, my personal obligation in refusing to be silenced. But there are also women who do things where the word “Twitter” is no weightier than “flutter,” who should be able to participate in a conversation online, just because they want to, without being called a derogatory term.The internet has radically shifted our communication forums, and in many ways the public square has shifted to take place online. Obviously, right? Duh? OK, so what does it mean if women are being ejected from those spaces by sheer force of will? What does it mean if participation comes at a measurable cost of capitalistic forces like time and energy?Anyway, I’m not sure. I’m either a warrior goddess or a triggered snowflake, depending on what side you’re on. If you think the former, I hope you’ll send me a message. This hurts like hell, but I’m in it now, and the support helps a lot.Related: Donald Trump Is Gaslighting AmericaCheck this out: follow usFacebookTwitterPinterest   /* dynamic basic css */ .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;height:30%;width:100%;text-align:center;top:35%;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_logo, .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('http://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('http://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('http://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('http://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('http://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('http://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} } .AR_1.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .AR_1.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .AR_1.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic strip css */ .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {position:relative;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-image-ratio {height:0px;line-height:0px;padding-top:68.18181818181817%;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-rec-image {width:100%;position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;opacity:0;transition:all 750ms;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-show {opacity:1;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;padding:0px 3px;background-color:#666;color:white;font-size:10px;line-height:15px;} .AR_1.ob-widget {width:auto;min-width:360px;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;min-width:50px;width:31.8%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName, .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogoAndName {display:inline-block;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:auto;height:auto;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:bottom;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:super;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {direction: ltr;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin-left:0;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin:0 0 0 2.3%; } .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {direction:ltr; } .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-unit {display:block;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-text {max-height:49.0px;overflow:hidden;font-weight:bold;} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-source {} .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} /* dynamic customized css */ .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:vogue-avant-garde, arial, 'Helvetica Neue', helvetica, sans-serif;;font-size:12px;color:#999999;padding-bottom:12px;padding-top:24px;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {max-width:330px;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-text {font-family:inherit;color:#555555;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-text:hover {color:#555555;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:inherit;color:#999999;padding:6px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:10px;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:inherit;padding:0px 0 0px;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;font-weight:400;} .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .AR_1 .ob-widget-section.ob-first { border: #e1e1e1 solid 1px; padding: 0px 47px 15px; /*margin-top: 48px;*/ } .OUTBRAIN .AR_1 .ob_what:hover { text-decoration: underline; } .AR_1 .ob-unit.ob-rec-image-container { margin-bottom: 10px; } .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-rec-text { line-height: 16px; } .AR_1 .ob-unit.ob-rec-source { text-transform: uppercase; } /*.AR_1 span.ob-unit.ob-rec-source:before { content: 'PROMOTED BY '; } */ .OUTBRAIN .AR_1 ul.ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row.ob-row-1 { padding-top: 20px; } .OUTBRAIN .AR_1 .ob_what a { font-size: 10px; font-family: "ff-dagny-web-pro",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; color: #999; } .AR_1.ob-widget .ob_what { direction: ltr; clear: both; padding: 5px 10px 0px; } .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container { width: 30.9%; } .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container { margin: 0px 0 0 3.582%; } /*mobile*/ @media screen and (min-width: 1px) and (max-width: 768px) { .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container { display: inline-block; width: 47%; } .AR_1 .ob-widget-section.ob-first { padding: 0px 10px 15px; margin-top: 50px; } .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-widget-header { padding-top: 10px; } .AR_1 .ob-unit.ob-rec-image-container { margin-bottom: 13px; } .AR_1 ul.ob-widget-items-container { display: inline; } .AR_1.ob-widget { min-width: 1px; } .AR_1.ob-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container { max-width: none; } .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container { margin: 0 0 0 0%; } body .OUTBRAIN .AR_1 li.ob-dynamic-rec-container.ob-recIdx-0 { margin-right: 6%; } body .OUTBRAIN .AR_1 li.ob-dynamic-rec-container.ob-recIdx-2 { padding-top: 20px; margin-right: 6%; } .AR_1 li.ob-dynamic-rec-container.ob-recIdx-3 { padding-top: 20px; } body .OUTBRAIN .AR_1 li.ob-dynamic-rec-container.ob-recIdx-4 { padding-top: 20px; margin-right: 6%; } .AR_1 li.ob-dynamic-rec-container.ob-recIdx-5 { padding-top: 20px; } body .OUTBRAIN .AR_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container { width: 47%; } } @media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1024px) { .AR_1 .ob-widget-section.ob-first { padding: 0px 35px 15px; } .AR_1 .ob-widget-section.ob-first { padding: 0px 35px 15px; } } @media screen and (min-width: 1024px) and (max-width: 1280px) { .AR_1 .ob-widget-section.ob-first { padding: 0px 24px 15px; } .AR_1 .ob-widget-section.ob-first { padding: 0px 24px 15px; } } SPONSORED STORIES Meryl Streep's Movies Ranked From Worst to Best PrettyFamous This Simple Skin Fix May Surprise You Gundry MD All 72 Nicolas Cage Movies Ranked From Worst to Best PrettyFamous How To Fix Your Fatigue (Do This Every Day) Gundry MD It's Scary What This Site Knows About You - Enter Your Name TruthFinder This Bed Linen Changed My Life (Yes, I'm Serious) A Cup of Jo | Brooklinen Powered by
    1. CHAPTER FOURTEEN §1§1@:i@j The Panathenaic Procession: Athens' Participatory Democracy on Display? LISA MAURIZIO Introduction The Panathenaia was a state festival celebrated in honor of Athena, Athens' patron divinity.1 It took place over a period of roughly a week and included musical and athletic contests, sacrifices, a boat regatta, a procession, an all-night revelry, a torch race, and, most importantly, a dedication of a garment to Athena. The Panathenaia has been called the "most political" of Athens' festivals and has been treated as distinctly democratic or populist. 2 This modern assessment echoes that of the Athenians themselves, who saw the Panathenaia as the event that occasioned the defeat of the tyrants and the birth of democracy.

      It's interesting to me that this is assumed to be related to democracy, when it has to do with Athena. Isn't it more likely that they were just celebrating Athena.. much as we celebrate God with holidays like Easter and Christmas? The second page seems to agree with this as well - that it being attributed to government may not be so accurate.. but I'm unable to annotate anything after this page. I do think though that the festival would have been, like I said, more closely related to something like Christmas.. different traditions used to celebrate their God. One might think athletic contests, sacrifices, torch races, etc are a weird way to celebrate a God.. but at the same time.. aren't stockings, tree decorations, etc kind of "weird" ways to celebrate a God too when you think about it?

  8. Dec 2016
    1. Verbal Communication An introduction, a presentation, a telephone conversation, a videoconference call: these are all examples of verbal communication because information is transmitted orally. Despite the ubiquitous use of technology in the business world, verbal communication is the most common method of exchanging information and ideas. Verbal communication is powerful, fast, and natural and includes voice inflections that help senders and receivers understand the message more clearly. The downside to verbal communication is that once it is spoken, the words are essentially gone; they are preserved only in the memory of those present, and sometimes the memories of the specific words spoken vary dramatically. The he-said-she-said argument is an example of this. No one really knows who said what unless the words are recorded. Recall is rarely exactly the same between two or more people. Voice inflection, the verbal emphasis you put on certain words, can have a significant impact on the meaning of what you say. In fact, the same words can take on completely different meaning based on the inflection you use. For example, if you say the sentence “I borrowed your book” with an inflection on a different word each time, the sentence communicates something completely different each time. Verbal communication may take place face-to-face, such as an in-person conversation or group meeting, speech, or presentation. It could also take place by phone in an individual conversation, a conference call, or even a voice mail. Other forms of verbal communication include video conferences, podcasts, and Webinars, which are increasingly common in business. All these methods allow you to use inflection to communicate effectively. Face-to-face meetings also provide the opportunity to use and interpret other visual cues to increase the effectiveness of your communication. Verbal communication is especially important throughout the steps of the selling process. Your choice of words can make the difference in someone’s decision to first hear your sales presentation, and your presentation can determine whether that person will purchase your product or service. Nonverbal Communication Imagine that you are in a retail store buying a suit for an interview. When the salesperson approaches you, she smiles, makes eye contact, and shakes your hand. You respond positively. You notice that she is dressed professionally, so she makes you feel as if you will receive good fashion advice from her. When you make your choice, the tailor comes over wearing a tape measure around his neck. You know he is a professional and you can trust him to alter your new suit properly. On the other hand, if the salesperson waits on you only after you interrupt her personal phone call, doesn’t make eye contact or shake your hand, acts as if she is bored being at work, and is dressed in worn jeans and flip-flops, it’s unlikely that you trust her to help you choose your suit. You have, no doubt, used and noticed nonverbal communication in virtually every personal encounter you have had. Think about it: A gesture, a smile, a nod, eye contact, what you are wearing, the fact that you are frequently checking your cell phone for text messages, and how close you stand to someone are all examples of nonverbal communication. Nonverbal communication is extremely powerful. In fact, some studies indicate that the influence from nonverbal communication such as tone and visuals can have a greater impact than the spoken words. Dr. Albert Mehrabian, a famed psychologist and professor emeritus of psychology at University of California, Los Angeles, is considered a pioneer in the area of body language and nonverbal communication. His research includes an equation, called the Mehrabian formula,[18] that is frequently used to define the relative impact of verbal and nonverbal messages based on experiments of communication of feelings and attitudes. Dr. Mehrabian developed the formula shown below, in Figure 3, to define how communication takes place: Figure 3. The Mehrabian Formula The Mehrabian formula is used to explain situations in which verbal communication and nonverbal communication do not match. In other words, when facial expressions contradict words, people tend to believe the facial expressions.[19] Types of Nonverbal Communication Handshake Body language Gestures Nodding or shaking your head Eye contact (or lack of eye contact) Eye roll Facial expressions Touch Space or proximity Dress Multitasking (e.g., texting while listening to someone, earphones in ears while working) Your Handshake Says It All In some countries, you might bow when you meet someone; in others you might kiss; but when you meet someone for a business meeting in the United States, it’s best to shake hands.[20] Although fist bumps and high fives may be trendy as friendly greetings, neither is appropriate in a business setting. The exact history of the handshake is unknown; however, at one time it was used as method to prove that you had no weapons in your hands.[21] A good handshake is essential in business; it is the first nonverbal cue that you give to the person with whom you are meeting. It’s so important to have a good handshake that a recent study conducted at the University of Iowa showed that during mock interviews, those students who scored as having a better handshake were also considered more hirable by interviewers. According to Greg Stewart, a business professor who conducted the study said, “We found that the first impression begins with a handshake and sets the tone for the rest of the interview.”[22] Do you think you have a good handshake? Believe it or not, it’s worth practicing your handshake. Here are five tips for a good handshake: Extend your right hand when you are approximately three feet away from the person with whom you want to shake hands.[23] Keep your wrist straight and lock hands connecting your hand with the same part of the other person’s hand.[24] Apply appropriate pressure; don’t crush the person’s hand. Shake up and down three or four times.[25] Avoid the “wet fish” handshake.[26] This is where practice is really important. The more you shake hands, the less nervous you will be. Smile and make eye contact.[27] This is your opportunity to use multiple types of nonverbal communication to get your meeting or interview off to a good start. Body Language Do you use your hands when you talk? If so, you are using body language to help make your point. But body language includes more than talking with your hands. Body language is what we say without words; nonverbal communication using your body includes elements such as gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, a head tilt, a nod, and even where and how you sit. Body language can indicate an unspoken emotion or sentiment that a person might be feeling either consciously or subconsciously. Body language can indicate if you are listening to someone and are engaged in what he is saying, disagreeing with him, or getting bored. (You might want to think twice about the body language you are using in class.) It’s important that you are aware of what you communicate with your body language and to understand and respond to the cues you are getting from someone else’s body language. Crossed arms: discomfort Spreading fingers: territorial display Mirroring (i.e., mimicking your body position to another’s): comfort Drumming or tapping fingers: frustration Hands on hips: there is an issue Hands behind the back: “leave me alone” Hands clasped, thumbs up: positive Thumbs down: don’t like Hands clasped with fingers forming a steeple: confidence Touch neck: insecurity Crossed legs: comfort Glancing at watch: concerned about time or bored Body language is not just an interesting topic to consider; it’s a proven science that can help you improve your communication.

      suggest deleting.

    1. Reading: Appropriate Business Communications Appropriate Business Communications You probably learned about table manners, thank-you notes, and other forms of etiquette when you were younger. The way you conduct yourself says a lot about who you are in life and, by extension, in business. Although many companies have a casual dress code, don’t be quick to assume that protocol and established practices aren’t important. It would be easy to misinterpret lack of formality as lack of professionalism. Letters and Memos Despite the use of electronic devices in business, formal written communication such as letters, memos, proposals, reports, and presentations are still major methods of communication in selling. These more official methods of communication reflect factual statements that you are making on behalf of the company. Here are some tips for writing business communications: Use company letterhead where appropriate. For example, letters are always written on letterhead, whether in hard copy or in an electronic format that can be sent via e-mail. Use the formal elements of a business letter shown below in Figure 1, “Business Letter Format”: Figure 1. Business Letter Format For a company memo, use the company format. Most companies have a set format for hard copy and electronic memos. See an example of a company memo below in Figure 2, “Company Memo Example”: Figure 2. Company Memo Example Spell-check and proofread your document carefully before you send it. Be sure it is complete and factually correct and does not include any grammar or spelling errors. Use CC to indicate the names of other people who should also receive a copy of the letter or memo. The term “CC” is short for “carbon copy,” which dates back to the days of typewriters when carbon paper was used to make multiple copies of a document. It can also mean “courtesy copy”: an additional copy provided to someone as a courtesy.[1] Conversations, Meetings, and Presentations Although common sense should prevail in all business communications, here are some tips that will help make your conversations, meetings, and presentations more effective forms of communication: Be prepared; don’t waste anyone’s time or focus. Prepare a written agenda and hand it out at the start of the meeting to keep the group focused on the desired topics. Speak clearly and at a volume that is easy to hear, but not too loud so as to be distracting. Be professional and respectful; don’t interrupt when others are speaking. Use eye contact. At the end, recap your key points and identify next steps. In business, time is money so conducting effective and efficient meetings is critical to your success. High Tech, High Touch The year was 1982, and the world was just beginning to realize the amazing potential of computer technology. John Naisbitt wrote a book called Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives, in which he coined the term “high tech, high touch,” which he defined as the contradictory state in which people are driven by technology yet long for human interaction. [2] In his 1999 book, High Tech/High Touch, he wrote about how the United States has been transformed from being comfortable with technology to being intoxicated with technology, a state he calls the “Technologically Intoxicated Zone.” You probably can’t imagine living without your cell phone or personal digital assistant (PDA), iPod, computer, or other electronic devices. In fact, it’s likely you can’t even remember what communication was like before the Internet. Technology, with all of its efficiency and benefits, cannot, however, become a substitute for old-fashioned human efforts. “Technology makes tasks easier, but it does not make our lives easier,” July Shapiro said in an article in Advertising Age.[3] Shapiro’s observation is true, especially as it relates to business; sometimes, the crush of technology takes precedence over business etiquette. However, people have begun to rethink the lack of personal interaction and its corresponding etiquette in the workplace. Yes, “there’s even an app for that”; a firm named Etiquette Avenue has recently launched an iPod app for business etiquette. The fact is, technology isn’t personal and can’t behave in the right way at the right time with your customer or on an interview; that’s completely up to you. Now, we’re seeing a bit of a reverse movement: Technology is so pervasive people are actually pushing back on their managers and asking them for more face time and less gadget time. Being Connected vs. Being Addicted In a recent pitch to a potential client, a marketing executive in Manhattan thought it was strange that his potential customer was so engaged with his iPhone that he hardly looked up from it during the meeting. After ninety minutes, someone peeked over the customer’s shoulder and saw that he was playing a racing game on his iPhone. This was disappointing, but not shocking according to the marketing firm that was doing the presentation; they continued with their pitch because they wanted the business. Some are not as tolerant. Billionaire Tom Golisano, a power broker in New York politics, recently announced that he wants to have State Senate majority leader Malcolm A. Smith removed from office because Smith was focused on his iPhone during a budget meeting with him. Recently, in Dallas, Texas, a student lost his opportunity for an internship at a hedge fund when he checked his phone to check a fact during an interview and took an extra minute to check his text messages at the same time. [4]  According to Maggie Jackson, author of Distracted: The Erosion of Attention and the Coming Dark Age, we are living in “an institutionalized culture of interruption, where our time and attention is being fragmented by a never-ending stream of phone calls, e-mails, instant messages, text messages, and tweets.”[5] The need to be connected should not overwhelm respect for colleagues and customers. Although texting has become a national pastime, especially among teenagers, it’s important to know the appropriate etiquette for the use of handheld electronic devices in the business environment. First, it’s best to turn off your electronic devices before you enter every meeting. If you think you can’t live without checking your text messages, think about how you would feel if you went on a job interview and the person with whom you were meeting was checking his electronic device during your interview. Just because some people demonstrate bad behavior and check their electronic devices for messages during a meeting doesn’t make it appropriate. In fact, it will help you stand out as a good listener. Telephone, Cell Phone, Voice Mail, and Conference Calls Sometimes, however, the use of technology is entirely necessary to conduct business when personal interaction is impossible. It’s important that verbal communication that is not face-to-face is effective and professional. Because you don’t have the benefit of using or seeing the receiver’s nonverbal communication, the challenges for effective and appropriate communication are even greater. Here are some dos and don’ts of telephone etiquette: Do be aware of the volume of your voice when you are speaking on the phone in the office or on a cell phone.[6] Do, when using a speakerphone, conduct the call in an enclosed or isolated area such as a conference room or office to avoid disturbing others in the area. Do, when leaving a voice mail message, speak slowly, enunciate, spell your name, and leave your number (this makes it much easier for the recipient to hear your message the first time).[7] Do, when you leave a voice mail message, be specific about what you want: make it easier for the caller to get back to you and include what time you will be available for a callback to avoid playing telephone tag.[8] Do customize your voice mail message: create a different message for each of your customers or prospective customers so the message is personal and relevant.[9] Do speak with enthusiasm: it’s best to convey a smile in your voice, especially if it is the first time you are calling or leaving a message for someone.[10] Don’t take another phone call during a meeting.[11] Don’t discuss confidential or personal issues during business calls. Don’t discuss confidential issues in public areas—you never know who might overhear a conversation in the hallway, on a train, or in other public areas.[12] Don’t leave a long, rambling voice mail message: be prepared with a message that is no longer than sixty seconds.[13] Don’t multitask during a long phone call or conference call—give the other person or people the courtesy of your full attention. E-mails, Text Messages, Instant Messages, and Social Networks Written communication has evolved to include multiple methods, all of which have appropriate places in selling. Notice the operative word here is appropriate. E-mail has become an accepted method of communication in most businesses, whereas text messages, instant messages, and social networks are commonplace for only some companies. That’s why etiquette is especially important when using any of these methods of communication, and you should take time to choose your method carefully. Letters, memos, proposals, and other written communication are considered formal, whether they are sent on paper or transmitted via e-mail. However, text messages, instant messages, and social networking are considered informal methods of communication and should be used only to communicate less formal information, such as a meeting time when schedules have been adjusted during a factory tour. Text and instant messages should never be used to communicate company policies, proposals, pricing, or other information that is important to conduct business with customers. It’s also worth noting that in all these methods your communication is permanent, so it’s a good idea to know the following dos and don’ts of electronic communication: Do use an e-mail subject line that clearly tells the recipient about the content of the e-mail. Do create a short, concise message that uses proper grammar and spelling—use spell-check to be sure all words are spelled correctly.[14] Do, in all electronic communications, use uppercase and lowercase letters as grammar dictates.[15] Do use e-mail, text messages, and instant messages when appropriate, according to your company’s practices, and with your customers to communicate factual information such as to confirm meeting date, time, and location.[16] Do use social networking sites to join the conversation and add value—you can build your personal brand by creating a blog or joining a professional conversation on social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook.[17] Don’t use all capital letters in an e-mail; it appears that you are shouting or angry.[18] Don’t use “Reply to All” unless it’s absolutely necessary that all the recipients see your response—be selective to avoid mailbox overload. Don’t send an e-mail, text message, or instant message when you are angry: take the time to think about what you send because you can’t take it back after it’s sent.[19] Don’t use abbreviations like “ur,” “2b,” and others—this is not appropriate business communication.[20] Don’t use company e-mail, text message, or instant message accounts to send personal correspondence, and don’t check your personal accounts or pages during company time, as all communication that takes place on company hardware and servers is property of the company. Don’t use electronic communication to transmit bad news: talk to the person first, and if follow-up is necessary, reiterate the information in written form. Don’t use text messages, instant messages, or social networks to communicate information such as pricing, proposals, reports, service agreements, and other company information that should be sent using a more formal method. Music to Your Ears When is an iPod or other MP3 player or a handheld gaming device appropriate at work? Only when it is used for business purposes. “You’re isolating yourself,” says Dale Chapman Webb, founder of The Protocol Centre in Coral Gables, Florida. “You are sending a message that my music is more important than the work at hand.” Mary Ellen Guffey, Business Communication, 6th ed. (Mason, OH: South-Western Publishing, 2008), 175. ↵John Naisbitt, Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives (New York: Grand Central Publishing, 1998). ↵July Shapiro, “A Digital Myth: Technology Doesn’t Make Life Easier,” Advertising Age, May 11, 2009, (accessed May 12, 2009). ↵Alex Williams, “At Meetings, It’s Mind Your Blackberry or Mind Your Manners,” New York Times, June 22, 2009, A1. ↵Patrick Welsh, “Txting Away Ur Education,” USA Today, June 23, 2009, A11. ↵Joanna L. Krotz, “Cell Phone Etiquette: 10 Dos and Don’ts,” Microsoft, (accessed July 12, 2009). ↵John R. Quain, “Quain’s Top Ten Voice Mail Tips,” Fast Company, December 18, 2007, (accessed July 17, 2009). ↵John R. Quain, “Quain’s Top Ten Voice Mail Tips,” Fast Company, December 18, 2007, (accessed July 17, 2009). ↵Keith Rosen, “Eight Tips on Crafting Effective Voice Mail Messages,” AllBusiness, (accessed July 17, 2009). ↵Keith Rosen, “Eight Tips on Crafting Effective Voice Mail Messages,” AllBusiness, (accessed July 17, 2009). ↵Joanna L. Krotz, “Cell Phone Etiquette: 10 Dos and Don’ts,” Microsoft, (accessed July 12, 2009). ↵Barbara Bergstrom, “Good Etiquette Is Recession-Proof,” Baltimore Business Journal, April 17, 2009, (accessed July 12, 2009). ↵John R. Quain, “Quain’s Top Ten Voice Mail Tips,” Fast Company, December 18, 2007, (accessed July 17, 2009). ↵“Shouting and Other E-mail Faux Pas,” BusinessLine, April 20, 2009. ↵“Shouting and Other E-mail Faux Pas,” BusinessLine, April 20, 2009. ↵Patricia M. Buhler, “Managing in the New Millennium: Six Tips to More Effective Communication,” Supervision 70, no. 7 (July 2009), 19. ↵Norman Birnbach, “10 Twitter Etiquette Rules,” Fast Company, July 2, 2008, (accessed July 17, 2009). ↵“Shouting and Other E-mail Faux Pas,” BusinessLine, April 20, 2009. ↵Paul Glover, “Why We Need E-mail Etiquette,” Fast Company, December 30, 2008, (accessed July 17, 2007). ↵Norman Birnbach, “10 Twitter Etiquette Rules,” Fast Company, July 2, 2008, (accessed July 17, 2009). ↵ Licenses and Attributions CC licensed content, OriginalRevision and adaptation. Authored by: Linda Williams and Lumen Learning. Provided by: Tidewater Community College. License: CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlikeCC licensed content, Shared previouslyPowerful Selling. Authored by: Anonymous. Provided by: Anonymous. Located at: http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/powerful-selling/s08-02-your-best-behavior.html. License: CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike

      I suggest deleting this section or moving it to the end of the module as an appendix. It's not a priority. More precisely, it is not in our course objectives.

    1. This is great, we all seemed to agree, yet one of us cautioned, “Without that connection with his mentor, though, this playlist might not have even got past the first XP.”

      In some of the assessment work I've done which involved looking closely at the youth submissions in response to playlists, I found it important to ask, "How might these playlists be warm demanders?"

      Reading this post now, I think that a student like Mary might read our playlists as "warm" opportunities because of the creative outlet and social connection she sees. A student like Precious may not see the social connections as safe, nor will she see the demands of the playlists as an opportunity without the help of a mentor or knowledgeable other.

    1. Beyond simply taking better control of our time in the moment, dedicating our time to something meaningful in the long-run is of great importance. To truly be satisfied with ourselves, to know we have spent our time in a positive way is a daunting sentiment. Speaking with Father Francisco Mota, a resident priest here at Boston College, the idea of “time well spent” in life was discussed. It was a tough question to answer, but what was eventually settled on between the two of us in conversation was that time well spent is the moments in our day, the moments in our lives when we lose track of time. Getting lost in a conversation with friends, getting lost in the moment is when we are most engaged and effective. To lose ourselves in the task at hand, to truly live in the moment is when we are at our best. Well, how then to live in the moment consistently, how to “lose ourselves” in the course of a lifetime? Father Mota would assert that we “live in a radical way.” He is not suggesting we live in a way that is dangerous or reckless, but that we dedicate ourselves to a life of importance, in whatever capacity that may be. There is a path to fulfillment in all of our lives, it is up to us to walk it.

      When I interviewed Father Mota, I asked questions on a wide variety of topics: essentially all topics I covered my paper (i.e general time perception, time perception shift with age, slow time, etc.). I had notes on his answers on this wide array of topics and had to decide which ones to use when constructing my original draft. Originally, I was planning on using Father Mota's segment on time perception shift with age, as it was a section of my piece I felt could be enhanced through the use of an outside voice. This was not necessarily a bad idea, but the more I thought about it, the more I realized I wasn't using Father Mota's dialogue to the fullest, I wasn't expressing his true significance. Father Mota is a priest; he is a spiritual man, a teacher, someone who shows others the way to a better life. This led me to think, why not use Father Mota in my essay then to integrate his own expertise: how to better live one's life, how to better take advantage of the time we have been given? I decided to construct a sort of "so what?" paragraph around Father Mota's comments on mindfulness and "living a radical life", a paragraph that would bring the major concepts of my essay to rest in a meaningful way. I thought that giving the reader a sense of resolution, and even "solution", to the heavy issues I had put before them throughout my piece would be a very worthwhile way in which to integrate Father Mota's dialogue. This revision centered on the idea of using a source to its fullest potential, not just haphazardly tossing it in.

  9. techwritingf16.robinwharton.net techwritingf16.robinwharton.net
    1. Specifically, before the exercise I asked some basic questions about partici-pants’current design activities and roles. I also asked—before showing them the38 principles in the exercise, which might bias their responses—what designprinciples they had learned about in their schooling, training, or reading; whatdesign principles they use in practice; and how they would define what a designprinciple is. I worded these questionsto allow a participant to respond that heor she does not know about or has not used design principles. After the exercisegave participants an opportunity to think about design principles, I asked somequestions about when and how we should use design principles, particularlyin relation to the empirical methods of design research.In introducing these survey questions, I asked participants to focus specificallyon visual design principles. All of the questions asked for text responses exceptfor the first pre-survey question, which gave several options of positions fromwhich to choose. I did not require responses to any question except question 1.

      As stated previously it is impossible to eliminate all bias when conducting an experiment. However, these questions may have created bias, they also added validity, uniqueness, and credibility to the experiment.

    2. One would think from this narrative that we have progressed from the murkydays of the craft tradition to the more enlightened and progressive landscape ofempiricism. But, in fact, design training still typically involves an introductionto visual design principles, which persist as criteria for judging designs andas heuristics for making design decisions.

      All things change in time, however foundation and principles usually persist. There are still elements and structures that we hold desigers to, in the same way there are still basic elements that one may use in writing a research paper, making sure the margins are aligned, and font is the same. Or even in scientific subject, there are still several ways to conduct an experiment but in all experiments there is foundation in (1) forming a question; (2) Doing research; and then (3) forming a hypothesis. However, the point is that there is basic foundations o structure in all subjects that one should abide by.

  10. Nov 2016
    1. Speech, writing, math notation, various kinds of graphs, and musical notation are all examples of cognitive technologies. They are tools that help us think, and they can become part of the way we think -- and change the way we think.

      Computer interfaces can be cognitive technologies. To whatever degree an interface reflects a set of ideas or methods of working, mastering the interface provides mastery of those ideas or methods.

      Experts often have ways of thinking that they rarely share with others, for various reasons. Sometimes they aren't fully aware of their thought processes. The thoughts may be difficult to convey in speech or print. The thoughts may seem sloppy compared to traditional formal explanations.

      These thought processes often involve:

      • minimal canonical examples - simple models
      • heuristics for rapid reasoning about what might work

      Nielsen considers turning such thought processes into (computer) interfaces. "Every theorem of mathematics, every significant result of science, is a challenge to our imagination as interface designers. Can we find ways of expressing these principles in an interface? What new objects and operations does a principle suggest?"

    1. Significant learning and development (change in performance) may be a painful experience as learners are required to replace existing assumptions with new ones.

      In another principle earlier this semester, we learned that learning and development can be effective at solving certain needs and one of the conditions was that learners would need to be motivated to learn. Do you think that this principle could connect with the idea that transformation can be painful in the sense that it may act to mediate this relationship? More simply put, do you think that the more motivated learners are, the less painful transformation will be and the easier time they will have at transforming existing assumptions?

    1. My son, though there may be suffering here, there is no death. Remember, remember!

      I realize we talked about this in class, but i think it's rather significant (especially since it is not the first time virgil has done soemthing like this) that while Virgil technically doesnt lie, Dante will still feel pain. It is, as Prof. pointed out, similar to the incident with the trees and the sodomites in Inferno.

    1. The king, who, as I before observed, was a prince of excellent understanding, would frequently order that I should be brought in my box, and set upon the table in his closet: he would then command me to bring one of my chairs out of the box, and sit down within three yards distance upon the top of the cabinet, which brought me almost to a level with his face.  In this manner I had several conversations with him.  I one day took the freedom to tell his majesty, “that the contempt he discovered towards Europe, and the rest of the world, did not seem answerable to those excellent qualities of mind that he was master of; that reason did not extend itself with the bulk of the body; on the contrary, we observed in our country, that the tallest persons were usually the least provided with it; that among other animals, bees and ants had the reputation of more industry, art, and sagacity, than many of the larger kinds; and that, as inconsiderable as he took me to be, I hoped I might live to do his majesty some signal service.”  The king heard me with attention, and began to conceive a much better opinion of me than he had ever before.  He desired “I would give him as exact an account of the government of England as I possibly could; because, as fond as princes commonly are of their own customs (for so he conjectured of other monarchs, by my former discourses), he should be glad to hear of any thing that might deserve imitation.” Imagine with thyself, courteous reader, how often I then wished for the tongue of Demosthenes or Cicero, that might have enabled me to celebrate the praise of my own dear native country in a style equal to its merits and felicity. I began my discourse by informing his majesty, that our dominions consisted of two islands, which composed three mighty kingdoms, under one sovereign, beside our plantations in America.  I dwelt long upon the fertility of our soil, and the temperature of our climate.  I then spoke at large upon the constitution of an English parliament; partly made up of an illustrious body called the House of Peers; persons of the noblest blood, and of the most ancient and ample patrimonies.  I described that extraordinary care always taken of their education in arts and arms, to qualify them for being counsellors both to the king and kingdom; to have a share in the legislature; to be members of the highest court of judicature, whence there can be no appeal; and to be champions always ready for the defence of their prince and country, by their valour, conduct, and fidelity.  That these were the ornament and bulwark of the kingdom, worthy followers of their most renowned ancestors, whose honour had been the reward of their virtue, from which their posterity were never once known to degenerate.  To these were joined several holy persons, as part of that assembly, under the title of bishops, whose peculiar business is to take care of religion, and of those who instruct the people therein.  These were searched and sought out through the whole nation, by the prince and his wisest counsellors, among such of the priesthood as were most deservedly distinguished by the sanctity of their lives, and the depth of their erudition; who were indeed the spiritual fathers of the clergy and the people. That the other part of the parliament consisted of an assembly called the House of Commons, who were all principal gentlemen, freely picked and culled out by the people themselves, for their great abilities and love of their country, to represent the wisdom of the whole nation.  And that these two bodies made up the most august assembly in Europe; to whom, in conjunction with the prince, the whole legislature is committed. I then descended to the courts of justice; over which the judges, those venerable sages and interpreters of the law, presided, for determining the disputed rights and properties of men, as well as for the punishment of vice and protection of innocence.  I mentioned the prudent management of our treasury; the valour and achievements of our forces, by sea and land.  I computed the number of our people, by reckoning how many millions there might be of each religious sect, or political party among us.  I did not omit even our sports and pastimes, or any other particular which I thought might redound to the honour of my country.  And I finished all with a brief historical account of affairs and events in England for about a hundred years past. This conversation was not ended under five audiences, each of several hours; and the king heard the whole with great attention, frequently taking notes of what I spoke, as well as memorandums of what questions he intended to ask me. When I had put an end to these long discources, his majesty, in a sixth audience, consulting his notes, proposed many doubts, queries, and objections, upon every article.  He asked, “What methods were used to cultivate the minds and bodies of our young nobility, and in what kind of business they commonly spent the first and teachable parts of their lives?  What course was taken to supply that assembly, when any noble family became extinct?  What qualifications were necessary in those who are to be created new lords: whether the humour of the prince, a sum of money to a court lady, or a design of strengthening a party opposite to the public interest, ever happened to be the motive in those advancements?  What share of knowledge these lords had in the laws of their country, and how they came by it, so as to enable them to decide the properties of their fellow-subjects in the last resort?  Whether they were always so free from avarice, partialities, or want, that a bribe, or some other sinister view, could have no place among them?  Whether those holy lords I spoke of were always promoted to that rank upon account of their knowledge in religious matters, and the sanctity of their lives; had never been compliers with the times, while they were common priests; or slavish prostitute chaplains to some nobleman, whose opinions they continued servilely to follow, after they were admitted into that assembly?” He then desired to know, “What arts were practised in electing those whom I called commoners: whether a stranger, with a strong purse, might not influence the vulgar voters to choose him before their own landlord, or the most considerable gentleman in the neighbourhood?  How it came to pass, that people were so violently bent upon getting into this assembly, which I allowed to be a great trouble and expense, often to the ruin of their families, without any salary or pension? because this appeared such an exalted strain of virtue and public spirit, that his majesty seemed to doubt it might possibly not be always sincere.”  And he desired to know, “Whether such zealous gentlemen could have any views of refunding themselves for the charges and trouble they were at by sacrificing the public good to the designs of a weak and vicious prince, in conjunction with a corrupted ministry?”  He multiplied his questions, and sifted me thoroughly upon every part of this head, proposing numberless inquiries and objections, which I think it not prudent or convenient to repeat. Upon what I said in relation to our courts of justice, his majesty desired to be satisfied in several points: and this I was the better able to do, having been formerly almost ruined by a long suit in chancery, which was decreed for me with costs.  He asked, “What time was usually spent in determining between right and wrong, and what degree of expense?  Whether advocates and orators had liberty to plead in causes manifestly known to be unjust, vexatious, or oppressive?  Whether party, in religion or politics, were observed to be of any weight in the scale of justice?  Whether those pleading orators were persons educated in the general knowledge of equity, or only in provincial, national, and other local customs?  Whether they or their judges had any part in penning those laws, which they assumed the liberty of interpreting, and glossing upon at their pleasure?  Whether they had ever, at different times, pleaded for and against the same cause, and cited precedents to prove contrary opinions?  Whether they were a rich or a poor corporation?  Whether they received any pecuniary reward for pleading, or delivering their opinions?  And particularly, whether they were ever admitted as members in the lower senate?” He fell next upon the management of our treasury; and said, “he thought my memory had failed me, because I computed our taxes at about five or six millions a-year, and when I came to mention the issues, he found they sometimes amounted to more than double; for the notes he had taken were very particular in this point, because he hoped, as he told me, that the knowledge of our conduct might be useful to him, and he could not be deceived in his calculations.  But, if what I told him were true, he was still at a loss how a kingdom could run out of its estate, like a private person.”  He asked me, “who were our creditors; and where we found money to pay them?”  He wondered to hear me talk of such chargeable and expensive wars; “that certainly we must be a quarrelsome people, or live among very bad neighbours, and that our generals must needs be richer than our kings.”  He asked, what business we had out of our own islands, unless upon the score of trade, or treaty, or to defend the coasts with our fleet?”  Above all, he was amazed to hear me talk of a mercenary standing army, in the midst of peace, and among a free people.  He said, “if we were governed by our own consent, in the persons of our representatives, he could not imagine of whom we were afraid, or against whom we were to fight; and would hear my opinion, whether a private man’s house might not be better defended by himself, his children, and family, than by half-a-dozen rascals, picked up at a venture in the streets for small wages, who might get a hundred times more by cutting their throats?” He laughed at my “odd kind of arithmetic,” as he was pleased to call it, “in reckoning the numbers of our people, by a computation drawn from the several sects among us, in religion and politics.”  He said, “he knew no reason why those, who entertain opinions prejudicial to the public, should be obliged to change, or should not be obliged to conceal them.  And as it was tyranny in any government to require the first, so it was weakness not to enforce the second: for a man may be allowed to keep poisons in his closet, but not to vend them about for cordials.” He observed, “that among the diversions of our nobility and gentry, I had mentioned gaming: he desired to know at what age this entertainment was usually taken up, and when it was laid down; how much of their time it employed; whether it ever went so high as to affect their fortunes; whether mean, vicious people, by their dexterity in that art, might not arrive at great riches, and sometimes keep our very nobles in dependence, as well as habituate them to vile companions, wholly take them from the improvement of their minds, and force them, by the losses they received, to learn and practise that infamous dexterity upon others?” He was perfectly astonished with the historical account gave him of our affairs during the last century; protesting “it was only a heap of conspiracies, rebellions, murders, massacres, revolutions, banishments, the very worst effects that avarice, faction, hypocrisy, perfidiousness, cruelty, rage, madness, hatred, envy, lust, malice, and ambition, could produce.” His majesty, in another audience, was at the pains to recapitulate the sum of all I had spoken; compared the questions he made with the answers I had given; then taking me into his hands, and stroking me gently, delivered himself in these words, which I shall never forget, nor the manner he spoke them in: “My little friend Grildrig, you have made a most admirable panegyric upon your country; you have clearly proved, that ignorance, idleness, and vice, are the proper ingredients for qualifying a legislator; that laws are best explained, interpreted, and applied, by those whose interest and abilities lie in perverting, confounding, and eluding them.  I observe among you some lines of an institution, which, in its original, might have been tolerable, but these half erased, and the rest wholly blurred and blotted by corruptions.  It does not appear, from all you have said, how any one perfection is required toward the procurement of any one station among you; much less, that men are ennobled on account of their virtue; that priests are advanced for their piety or learning; soldiers, for their conduct or valour; judges, for their integrity; senators, for the love of their country; or counsellors for their wisdom.  As for yourself,” continued the king, “who have spent the greatest part of your life in travelling, I am well disposed to hope you may hitherto have escaped many vices of your country.  But by what I have gathered from your own relation, and the answers I have with much pains wrung and extorted from you, I cannot but conclude the bulk of your natives to be the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth.”

      Political commentary. How does this King compare to Britain's in Swift's time? How do the policies Gulliver talks about match up to policies today?

    1. Yet a growing body of research makes it clear that children begin to internalize dominant beliefs about gender as early as preschool

      This is such a true statement. I currently work in a preschool and it is very hard to break the typical gender stereotypes that the children already have in their mind. From a young age the children believe that only the girls should play with the dolls or dress up in the kitchen and they boys should be the ones playing with the action figures or matchbox cars. We have kid who are afraid to play in certain centers because of what their peers may think of them. At 3 or 4 kids should not have to worry about what others will think of them and what toys they should and shouldn't be playing with. As educators we need to break this stereotype so children feel comfortable doing or playing with whatever they want.

    1. At some point in the future, project directors seeking government funding could be turned down if they are unable to demonstrate in their grant proposals that the results of their work will be accessible.

      I agree with Williams that in the future, digital equality will become more important as more of our world becomes digital. The withholding of funds has historically been a powerful tactic of the federal government to carry out it's directives both nationally and internationally. If a company is not compliant with the current federal laws, they should not be entitled to any federal funds.

      This is also interesting since this quote bleeds into a similar field which is proposal and grant writing. We could write a brilliant proposal but if there is not enough content that is accessible to the blind, the funding could be withheld. As a proposal writer that has read this article, my mind should already be thinking about ways to include every audience, including for this example, the blind.

      Even a non profit, say the Center for Civic Innovation for example, may have to comply with federal guidelines that protect people with disabilities from being left out of the current digital age. If I was a head of a non-profit, I think working towards this goal of digital inclusivity looks better when the work is pro-active and not reactive. Instead of changing because of a lawsuit, change should be brought on out of a genuine desire to help. Of course being the first to do something always helps garner a bit of positive press. In the capitalist business world, being the first always helps garner more profit.

    2. Online information presented in audio or video format is not accessible to deaf and hard-of-hearing end users without captions. These individuals benefit from online captioning as well as from written transcriptions presented as separate and independent documents. Creating captions and transcriptions makes such information subject to search and computer analysis in ways not currently possible with audio and video alone. Additionally, individuals without disabilities often find transcriptions easier to follow

      Coming from a world of film, many film makers may only think of subtitles as a way to make sure people who speak another language can understand the film. During my undergrad at Georgia State, I can honestly say that trying to make our movies more friendly to people that are hard of hearing was at no point a priority. Now that I'm thinking about video this way, it seems like a super simple element that can be added to a video to make it understandable to those that may be deaf.

      Williams states how, "Creating captions and transcriptions makes such information subject to search and computer analysis..." This part is fascinating since anyone who makes a video for YouTube wants to get as many views as possible. By catering to the deaf and adding captions and transcriptions, a video can now be found easier than it was before. This is another benefit of thinking about universal design when creating content whether it's text or a video.

      Williams also points out that by adding a transcription, people who are not hard of hearing are able to comprehend the content easier as well. So by opening up to audiences with disabilities, we may also be helping audiences without them. To me, this is exactly why we should apply elements of Universal Design to our work. Content that was narrow in it's focus before now has a broader reach and impact.

    1. Thus, The Skin of Religion, offers a metaphor to emphasize the way religion signifies through its materiality, through contact between perceiver and object represented. It also suggests the way vision itself can be tactile, as though one were touching [religious images and objects] with one’s eyes: I term this haptic religiosity. Finally, to think of religion as a skin acknowledges the effect of [symbolic] circulation among different audiences, all of which mark it with their presence. The title is meant to suggest polemically that religion may be thought of as impressionable and conductive, like skin.

      One fun part about this is that it behaves a great deal like my friend Piotr Blumczynski's use of interdisciplinary substitutions to illustrate the process of translation. I imagine we could do a second layer substitution, putting interface in place of skin.

    1. We speak the language of our discipline, which raises two problems: first, we may not understand the languages of the other disciplines; second, more dangerously, we may think that we understand these, but do not, because although the same terms are used in different disciplines, they mean something very different in each.

      I never though of this as being a challenge to interdisciplinary research but it is a very good and important point. For example, while I was in Nursing school you learn the language of the nursing world and not everyone in the healthcare world may understand it which can create confusion and mistakes.

    1. Before you ever start browsing through fonts on your computer or searching for a new one to buy or download, it would be a good idea to brainstorm some of the qualities or characteristics that you want your design to communicate.

      This seems like a simple thing to do, but planning what exactly we want our content to achieve is a great idea. This includes of course, planning what we are going to write, but also what that writing is going to look like. We can plan around images and page sizes, but we also need to plan on how the user reads our content.

      For example, if we are writing for a new part of the AARP website, we should probably choose a font that is thicker and stands out for those who may have trouble seeing. If we look back at our previous reading this is also a tenet of Universal Design. If we're going to be thinking about audience and how we can reach as many people as possible, fonts and type faces have to be a part of that discussion. How we emphasize certain words and sentences with fonts and spacing can determine how easy a user can skim through the content we create.

      But, back to the beginning, planning. Fonts can seem like something to think about last, but the crux of this reading so far, to me, is that this should be a part of the design process from the beginning since it can inform the reader so much about not only the content, but the author as well.

    2. The I/l/1 test: For any font you’re considering for passages of text that include both letters and numbers, try this: Type out a capital I, a lowercase L, and the number one. If two or more look identical, then readers might stumble over certain words or letter/number combinations.

      This is another passage this semester that blew my mind a little bit. I think many of us have been reading, typing or writing and noticed that our 1's, L's and I's look somewhat similar if not totally identical.

      If we are going to be using fonts and typefaces as way to maintain a cohesive design and improve the overall effectiveness of the content, then this test should be tool we all keep in our back pockets. The last thing we want as a content managers is for our content to be confusing. If we look back to elements of universal design, there may be a person who is new to the English language and the similarity of the 1's, L's, and I's may be enough to make the piece to complicated to read or fully understand.

      Even if the reader does have a firm grasp of the language, as the article has explained, by making the fonts easier to understand the reader can access the information they need quicker and thus the content is more useful. This is what we as technical writers need to be attempting in our layouts and design.

  11. techwritingf16.robinwharton.net techwritingf16.robinwharton.net
    1. Isolation Surround important elements with lots of white space. Elements surrounded by generouswww. mintocommercial, com/home. htm),white space are thought to be accorded greater attention. As a result, isolating an element in a dis­play implies that it is more important (Goldsmith

      This quote is another aspect of design that seems so simple that it could easily be forgotten. Personally this is something I've probably noticed thousands of times but have never stopped to think about why a title for example, was surrounded by white space.

      By surrounding elements that require greater attention with white space as the quote implies, we are assigning that element value. In separating a title from the rest of the body copy in an article, we have created value without having to add any other design elements. Without a fancy font or added font thickness, a piece of text just separate and surrounded by white space is easily understood to be worth remembering.

      An example of this could be found when reading an article whether on line or in a magazine when the author takes a quote from their own article and creates white space around it surrounded by body copy. This creates points of emphasis while also breaking up the copy into smaller pieces as well. While they may use a different font or boldness, the separation implies this particular quote is important in regards to the rest of the article.

    2. Good design reveals structure when it visually mimics the logical relationships that exist among elements in a display. The human visual system attempts to find the structure of information—whether in a scene, on a page, or on a screen—very early in its efforts to process it, and it does so by looking for visual patterns.

      To me, this quote is explaining the psychology of good design.

      Humans need structure. Within a structure they are free to improvise, but that structure is what creates a template of understanding. The jazz guitarist can play millions of notes that don't seem to make sense, but he may be actually stringing together multiple scales and arpeggios that to a casual listener sound disjointed, but are actuality a framework for which his seemingly improvised notes are connected.

      This type of thinking can be applied to our designs and layouts as well. While we may all want to be totally unique and innovative, we may want to think about how far we stray from conventional designs and templates. Many of these design conventions may exist due to how they are able to easily guide humans through a website for example. As the quote mentions, the "human visual system" is looking for "visual patterns". We are exploiting that by arranging our content in a way that makes the most sense by using fonts and spacing that can create hierarchies which can guide the reader through our writing even easier.

    3. A number of assumptions are commonly made about the efficacy of icons in graphical user interfaces. They include the notion that icons, because they are pictorial, are almost invariably easy to interpret. A corollary' is that they' are universally interpretable because the key to meaning con­veyed pictorially is not bound to any one language. These assumptions, which are largely incorrect, stem in part from a confusion between the notions of “identification” and “interpretation." While it may well be true that, at least for concrete things and ideas, pictures facilitate rapid, and sometimes universal, identification, it is certainly not al­ways true that they efficiently or unambiguously convey what we intend an object to mean (Salomon 1979; Sebeok 1994; Williams 1996

      This quote is so interesting because it was published back in 2000 and the use of icons or in our futuristic world, emoji's, has only increased.

      One aspect that Salomon, Sebok and Williams all point out in this excerpt is that not all icons are universally understood. One icon in one culture may have another meaning in another. While a smiley face may be universal, a thumbs up may not be. Today we have a wide array of icons or emojis that are used in online publication but also personal communication. However, if one is not totally caught up on pop culture, the meaning of these icons may be lost. While we may think that a picture is worth a thousand words, we as technical writers need to understand that those words may not translate well in a thousand different languages.

      An interesting study would be to find out which emoji's or icons are the most popular in other languages such as French, Chinese, Swahili or Russian for example. In these languages, icons may not even play a significant role in everyday communication as much as they seem to in Western and specifically English speaking cultures.

    4. While ''thematic” pictures may be acceptable when their relationship to the site and its contents can be easily in­ferred, pictures chosen only to decorate a site often con­fuse. At best such pictures provide no assistance to the viewer in acquiring information being conveyed by a site.

      Something that we have touched on all semester is the use of as many modes as possible when we are trying to communicate to as many audiences as possible. One mode we should always think about using is pictures.

      Since we are all somewhat young technical writers in training, we need to be training ourselves to communicate as much as possible as succinctly as possible. In regards to this reading and specific quote, that also means making sure that the images we use are actually useful for the overall content we are creating. As Williams mentions, there will be times when we need a decorative image. But most of the time we will be using images to help convey information as clearly as possible. As we have discussed in class, images can help reach more audiences but also enhance the content by adding a visual element which will enhance the effectiveness of the information we are trying to display.

      We must also remember that some readers may get what they need from our content just by looking at the pictures and the headlines. That is ok. This is an audience we should be planning for. Users are looking for content and want to digest that content quickly. Adding visual elements will help them accomplish that.

    5. "Backgrounds, consequently, should be, as far as possible, devoid of pattern or, if esthetic considerations demand that they be patterned, be very subtle or muted." (pg. 2, Lynch and Horton 1999)

      The above quote points to something so simple that it can easily be overlooked. A background should be simple, that's why it is the background. Think of it as a band with a talented lead singer. The lead singer (the content) is the main attraction. The back up vocalists (the background) are there to support the lead singer (the content). They must know their roles for the entire show to be a success. It was never Smokey Robinson and Jeff, Carl and Glenn. It was Smokey Robinson and the Miracles. There must be order.

      When we add different patterns and bold colors that contrast with the beautiful content we've just created we are doing ourselves and possibly our employers a disservice since the content will not be as useful or in some cases even hard to look at for long periods of time. While thinking about design, everything must work in concert for us to achieve the best results. We may not always get there, but we need be to striving towards that goal.

    1. Functions - Direct the reader's eye to the most important information, express hierarchies of value

      I believe that this is an extremely important factor of layout and format in technical communication that often goes unnoticed. I think that this is partially due to the way that students are taught to write academic essays. For example, when writing an argumentative essay with three main ideas, we are typically taught to present our two strongest ideas at the beginning and end of the body paragraphs, while squeezing less effective points in the middle. On the contrary, in technical communication it is most effective to place strongest points at the top or center of the document, as readers may become less engaged as they read towards the end of the document.

    2. Remember that text and visuals work together to help readers understand complexinformation so they can make decisions.

      Are the words table and figure interchangeable? Is a figure different than a table?

      It is important to make sure that tables are easily understood. Although it may be ideal for tables to be understandable on their own, sentences that elaborate the data found in the table are helpful, and as technical writers we should make sure that tables correlate with the information/research points within the paper or presentation we are working on.

      Placement of tables is another thing to consider when creating a document. The table should probably be on the same page as the text that describes it. A lengthy table can be distracting and difficult for the reader to visualize as a whole. I think the table from the Dragga article we had to read was formatted poorly. It ran across multiple pages, and overlapped into text that wasn't explicitly talking about contents within the table; however, the table in question did not convey data, it illustrated the questions that survey respondents were given to complete.See figure 1 on pages 256-57 in Dragga's "Is This Ethical?" article.

      Sam Dragga (1996). “‘Is This Ethical?’ A Survey of Opinion on Principles and Practices of Document Design.” Technical Communication 43.3: pp. 255-65.

    1. But we need at least 15 – 20 more examples that are as different from current practice as Mike’s fedwiki work is, before we can have a substantive conversation about open pedagogy.

      In addition to examples, I think we need to show teachers through research that this works before they drop their current teaching practices and adopt ones that may feel totally radical.

    1. We also need to recognize the risks of blogging/tweeting, which include opening avenues for abuse. We should not be throwing students into the public domain to discuss sensitive topics without having conversations with them on what they might face and which of these risks they are willing to take, how they would handle it, and how they might support each other. Then we should give them a private option if they so choose.

      Social media can be a very unwelcoming place to be. One word that's wrong and it's like you started WWIII. Although a bit exaggerated, ultimately true. Social media, if anything is a modern day battle ground where people are going to get offended by basically anything and everything. That is why it is better that there are warnings before and during conversations in a public domain, so that students may avoid such conflict, or even create a community where everyone feels comfortable to state their opinions without being shot down, while still keeping it public. I wouldn't necessarily think to put them in a private domain, though the option will always be there, only because students deal with a harsh society on a daily basis, behind a digital surface. There at least needs to be some level of trust given to the students that they can handle themselves in a public environment. I do understand that no one willing wants to put their students in a high-risking environment, and I'm certainly not saying that by doing so will you be a great, or even a bad teacher or professor; but what it really is, is that by putting students in a public domain, it gives them a chance and experience to go not only digital skill, but digital literacy. By having students in a public domain, a domain that they have all experienced one way or another through social media sites, and giving them meaningful tasks to do, you will essentially see digital literacy. Students not only gain digital skills, to effectively use technology, but they also gain awareness for not only their fellow peers, but respect for the public domain as well. If the issue is still that of high-risk, then it is the professor and the student's job to make sure that the the risk level is not as high as it might be. For example, as I mentioned earlier, warning students before and during the tasks of using public domains will help bring the risks down. However if the goal is to in fact gain digital literacy as well as digital skill, would not such a high-risk factor actually go down as these are gained, therefore having public domain be the most efficient way to do so?

  12. www.seethingbrains.com www.seethingbrains.com
    1. “I should say so,” said the cleaning woman and, by way of proof, poked Gregor’s body with the broom a considerable distance more to the side. Mrs. Samsa made a movement as if she wished to restrain the broom, but didn’t do it. “Well,” said Mr. Samsa, “now we can give thanks to God.” He crossed himself, and the three women followed his example.

      This quote embodies the lack of humanity and care that Gregor's family, for whom he previously provided for and loves, care little for him simply because of his appearance. However, the slight detail of Mrs Samsa perhaps wanting to restrain the broom makes one think, does she really care about her dead son, but refuses to show it because of his alternate form? This care is quickly rebutted by Mr Samsa's comment implying he hardly cared about the death, and was happy to have the burden of a large bug off of his shoulders. While this quote doesnt show it, this is in contrast to Grete, who has had a very hard journey coming to the realization that her brother may not be worth her attention anymore. She lies apart from the family in that she truly showed her care for Gregor, but saw it wane over time because of his poorer state.

    1. In my experience, people who report waking up in the middle of the night most commonly do so around 3 a.m. This alone may not be very significant, but many people with insomnia say that they have a hard time falling back asleep. We usually attribute this to being an awakening that occurs after the deep sleep of the night has ended and the time of increasing dream sleep has started. At the end of a sleep cycle we are almost awake and it may not take much, even a full bladder or a sound, to fully wake us. Some people may fall back asleep and not even remember the brief awakening. Others may take a trip to the bathroom and quickly return to sleep. If that doesn’t occur, it is usually because excessive thinking or negative cognitive processes begin. Worrying about not sleeping results in further arousal, which makes it difficult to fall back asleep, which causes more worry that leads to more arousal, and so on. After an hour or so of tossing and turning the person will probably fall back asleep until their alarm goes off. The relationship between excessive nocturnal mental activity and over-arousal that leads to difficulty staying asleep seems clear. But what if there is more going on? There is good reason to believe that this explanation is not the full story. The evidence comes from two different sources: One is historical and the other is based in research done in the 1990s. We will return to this evidence in a bit. I remember being in graduate school and being told that humans don’t sleep like wolves or cats. As anyone who has a feline companion knows full well, frequent naps are a part of a cats' daily routine. Humans, as everyone knows, are typically awake for 16 hours straight and then asleep for eight—one long period of wakefulness and one long period of sleep. Seems simple enough. But in certain areas of the world people have a siesta, a regular afternoon rest period that often includes a nap. And they seem to do just fine. In fact, this may be a better way of living than knocking back a 16-ounce energy drink and going for a brisk walk around the office to try and get through the afternoon slump that frequently happens around 2 p.m. or so. If you have traveled to a developing country, you may have noticed that people seem to be able to nap whenever they can, and that they seem to find this refreshing. If humans seem to need a break for sleep in the middle of the day’s waking period, what about needing to be awake for a period of time in the middle of the night’s sleep period? After all, we generally consider a brief awakening for a trip to the bathroom to be fairly normal. But how normal is it to be able to quickly fall back asleep? Source: Russ Potak, 1988 used with permission. As I mentioned above, there is evidence, and from very different directions, that quickly falling back to asleep after a middle-of-the-night awakening may not be natural for humans. It could be that, left to our natural inclinations in a 24-hour day, humans would have a period of wakefulness, an afternoon siesta, another period of wakefulness, a period of sleep, a period of wakefulness in the middle of the night, and another period of sleep. It may be biologically normal to be up in the middle of the night.article continues after advertisement This idea was first introduced to the public, as far as I can determine, in an excellent 2012 BBC article (link is external). The article briefly reviews several of the major issues involved in what is known as segmented sleep. I was introduced to it at a seminar during the 2013 national sleep conference entitled, “One Sleep or Two? The History and Science of Segmented Sleep.” Ekirch (2001, 2006, 2016), has done important work in documenting different sleep patterns in the preindustrial world. The historical evidence indicates that people in the Middle Ages were up for an hour or more in the middle of the night and thought of sleep as occurring in two segments: first sleep and second sleep. In many ways, this makes sense because being awake during the night has certain advantages. At that time, one could stoke the fire, check the defenses, have sex, and tell tall tales. We don’t think much about it now, but before gas and electric lighting, the night could be a frightening time (link is external). Think about the dangers that might await you if you ventured out in the night without a good source of illumination. In the country, you could fall in a ditch, be attacked by an animal, be attacked by robbers, or simply never be heard from again. In the city, you could also be attacked and never heard from again. Getting up and making sure your residence was warm and safe made a lot of sense. When the industrial revolution occurred, it became necessary to regiment our lives. In the preindustrial era there was little reason to stay up after dark—most people had no easy source of illumination beyond a candle or cooking fire and, again, it was scary outside. With the development of factories and the need for regular work shifts, people had to get their sleep when they could—usually at night. So, by staying up throughout the day, sleep drive was sufficient to get deep enough into sleep that people stayed asleep throughout the night. We are all familiar by now with the impact that light at night has on our circadian rhythm, and how we now stay up later and sleep less than in the past. It makes biological sense to have segmented sleep. If the mid-afternoon siesta has some roots in our evolutionary history, it may be that it served to conserve energy resources and help our ancestors lay low during the hot mid-day sun on the savannas of Africa where weak, slow, formerly tree-inhabiting humans were very vulnerable. At night, they would have been extremely vulnerable in deep sleep, so a period of wakefulness during which they could make sure they were safe made sense.article continues after advertisement It's not just historical data that supports the idea of segmented sleep. Further evidence emerged from work on circadian rhythm. Wehr (1991, 1992) conducted experiments showing that humans could take on a biphasic sleep (link is external) pattern. This occurred when experimental participants were exposed to “winter” conditions with a forced schedule of 10 hours of light and 14 hours of total dark. (Note that total dark is not something most of us are used to. A look around almost any modern bedroom will find many electronic sources of light.) When this schedule was imposed, participants began to naturally adopt a sleep schedule in which they slept for four hours, awakened for one to three hours, and then slept for another four. It seems that, under the right environmental conditions, this could be a natural sleep pattern for humans. Exposure to light is the most important factor in lengthening our days and then (more or less) sleeping through the night. Our sleep patterns have certainly been affected by the invention of electric lighting (link is external) and, before that, but to a lesser degree, by gas lights such as those used to light the streets of Paris since the 1600s. The upshot is that we still have a lot to learn about sleep and insomnia. For individuals who wake up in the middle of the night, the realization that their awakening may just be a throwback to an earlier sleep pattern may reduce some of the frustration and anxiety they feel. This is part of the cognitive behavioral technique of cognitive restructuring, or reducing stress by having more accurate information about sleep. It is also possible that we need to think about other patterns of sleep and not confine ourselves to assuming that the regimented, factory-shift-driven model we’ve all come to know is what we should to strive for.  There is likely more than one way for the Sandman to welcome us to the Land of Nod.

      I was not able to find access to any of the original research. But I was able to find an article on split sleep. Arnulf, Brion, Pottier, and Gomard conducted a research on Cloistered monks and nuns adaptation to split sleep. They had 10 willing participants both monks and nuns. As a control group they had the same amount of people that slept through the night. They tested this for six months.

      In their research they found that the monks tend to "have longer sleep latency, shorter sleep time, higher morning fatigue, and more complaints of memory lapses than" (Arnulf, I. et. al., 2011, 935) those who slept through the night. So according to this research split sleep is not the best for people, but the monks have done it for centuries. So I feel there should be more research on the topic of split sleep, and not have it so focused on one author and their research.

                               Reference 
      

      Arnulf, I., Brion, A., Pottier, M., & Golmard, J. L., (2011). Ring the bell for matins: Circadian adaptation to split sleep by cloistered monks and nuns, Chronobiology international: The journal of biological & medical rhythm research, 28(10), 930-941. Doi: 10.3109/07420528.2011.624436

  13. Oct 2016
    1. it’s evidence that a cultural truce over gender expression might not be possible.

      I don't think people will ever really reach a truce on anything. As Tick says in "His & Hers", we are on the move towards a time where post-gender will affect our designs, but I think that some people themselves will never truly be able to give up their natural hatreds. In fact, it may also be that we never reach an ethnical truce, a racial truce, a religions truce, or any kind of truce. Not until our history is able to vanish or our minds augmented and uploaded will we be able to drop our biases.

    1. Perhaps its removal may cause cureless deformity; or it may be the stain goes as deep as life itself. Again: do we know that there is a possibility, on any terms, of unclasping the firm gripe of this little hand which was laid upon me before I came into the world?”

      As I read this, I think it means that if they go along with the surgery, what if something goes wrong? What if everything is for a reason and this birth mark is meant to be on her cheek?

    1. even worse.

      This was really interesting to me because if you read further, he refers to Bush's presidency and how a lot of his actions went against what he says using words such as liberty, freedom and repetition of the word. It makes people not really think about the definition of freedom but knows that everything is okay because he keeps saying it so that means America is doing good because we are free people. However they may not be aware of what other countries struggles may be due to us and our actions as a free country.

    1. In this tutorial, you’ll learn how to use GIMP’s layers in a different manner. Unlike it’s default composite function, using GIMP as an animation package requires you to think of every layer as of an animation frame. We’ll discuss the two different frame disposal methods later on. For now let us think about every layer as of a separate frame.

      I honestly cannot STAND Gimp. It's the cheap, cop-out to Photoshop, and it gave me such a hard time, that I ended up just going to the computers in the convergence center and used the Photoshop software that's available to us as students. I realize that we may not always have that access, but in this case, I'd choose to do that, as opposed to dealing with the weird set-up and constant crashing that Gimp has to offer.

  14. thecoverpage.pushpullfork.com thecoverpage.pushpullfork.com
    1. A presence that inspires not ideas of grandeur or adventure, nor ideas of hope and higher callings to greater paths. No this book inspires the basest of human emotion and thought. Fear, terror, paranoia, the feeling that perhaps the world is not so simple, that there is a hidden curtain waiting to be pulled back so that what is hidden may be shown to the audience, and the audience become consumed by what is shown. This story brings back feelings we had as children that led us to turning the light next to our bed on in panic, the quick sudden scrambling to reach that hidden flashlight under the pillow to chase away the shadows and whatever may be lurking in them. The feeling of abject horror as you descend into the darkest basement, one that is coated in cobwebs and smells of damp rot and the promise that something sinister is lurking in the gloom

      This is fantastic. I enjoyed reading how describe what you think about The Hound of the Baskervilles. You covered all!

    1. According to Grunewald colleges must be redesigned as completely interdisciplinary. I couldn’t even imagine my excitement if I attended a school with zero majors. If every single person build his or her degree from the bottom up, how creative and amazing would that be? I feel like many students these days are pressured into certain degrees, and they may not actually wish to utilize that degree for the rest of their life.

      This would be amazing. I think this is the push we need to make students make their education their priority

    2. For example, one with a degree in education may apply for a job with over 100 other applicants; where as maybe only 2 out of the 100 are interdisciplinary studies. From an employers view; I would must rather higher someone who knows not only how to teach, but knows information about science, English, health etc. According to Gruenwald, interdisciplinary studies and the idea of a true university that fosters open-

      I think everyone should and does have some form of interdisciplinary into their major or career. Being strictly apart of one field is not reasonable in today's society. We have to broaden our knowledge.