7,842 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2019
    1. educing the size of the record,

      I forget what the actual measurements are, but I saw an article once that was talking about how we went from having computers in a whole room, to having one in our pocket

    2. conclusions which he cannot find time to grasp, much less to remember, as they appear

      We see this now with the rise of the internet. There is so much information out there that it is impossible to comprehend it all. This has lead to a sense of complacency, for what is the point of truly learning and understanding something if you can just google it?

    3. aterial environment.

      This brings to mind the movie Ready Player One, where the digital world was taken to a whole other level. The players were able to quite literally create a new life for themselves. They could create a whole new house, food, and outfit that would appear very real. When this article was written this type of revolutionary changing of ones material environment was not thought of.

    4. turn back the enemy

      In international affairs after the Cold War we are seeing more and more how diplomacy trumps the use of violence and these weapons that could turn back the enemy. Now that the world and scientists know the extent to what these technologies could be there is almost a sense that we went too far, that these weapons are too great for our use. So now countries do almost anything to avoid outright conflict, because the cost almost always outweighs the demand.

    5. It sees as if science, more than any other field has advanced since this "war", they might be searching for the same familiar objectives, but their laboratories have definitely changed. For example, the use of digital media allows for them to explore and study people and cultures they might not have been able to reach before.

    6. The world has arrived at an age of cheap complex devices of great reliability; and something is bound to come of it.

      I think that this entire section is absolutely fascinating. Just the idea that modern technologies could have been invented/thought up a very long time ago, but the cost of production in those times would have bankrupted a person (and the tech most likely would have broken very easily). And now, it's cheaper to make and it's way more reliable. I just think that's very interesting.

    7. specialization becomes increasingly necessary for progress, and the effort to bridge between disciplines is correspondingly superficial.

      i would think of this as the use of digital tools. They are, in my opinion, designed to help the average American easily navigate through the technological world.

    8. It is the physicists who have been thrown most violently off stride

      This intrigues me because when you think of "physicists", the first thing that comes to my mind is not exactly technology. But i can understand now where they are coming from with after reading this paragraph.

    9. vironme

      This article is very intriguing. Science is mentioned a lot in this article referencing how much it influences communication and new instruments in discovering how research is found.

    10. Science has provided the swiftest communication between individuals; it has provided a record of ideas and has enabled man to manipulate and to make extracts from that record so that knowledge evolves and endures throughout the life of a race rather than that of an individual.

      This passage reminds me of the cell phone and how convenient it has made our lives. I use mine to record ideas, take notes, set reminders, and make schedules, and it is all accessible within seconds right from my pocket.

    11. They have improved his food, his clothing, his shelter; they have increased his security and released him partly from the bondage of bare existence

      This sentence stood out to me because it points out the incredible benefits we have received from technology. It has allowed to us to dramatically increase our life spans due to advances in medicine and increase food production by use of GMO’S and pesticides

    12. Science has provided the swiftest communication between individuals; it has provided a record of ideas and has enabled man to manipulate and to make extracts from that record so that knowledge evolves and endures throughout the life of a race rather than that of an individual.

      Definitely an interesting and accurate prediction here.

    13. Is it not possible that some day the path may be established more directly?

      absorbing information through multiple senses...I'm not quite sure what that could refer to today but with how technology has advanced it is a lot easier to gain access to knowledge, like using your computer and internet in the comfort of your own home.

    14. In the Bell Laboratories there is the converse of this machine, called a Vocoder. The loudspeaker is replaced by a microphone, which picks up sound. Speak to it, and the corresponding keys move.

      From a linguistic standpoint, this is interesting, knowing how speech-to-text programs still make mistakes in trying to decipher what a person is saying, and the issues that have arisen continuously with differing dialects and the varied phonological inventories of different languages.

    15. the whole affair, assembled and compressed, could be lugged off in a moving van. Mere compression, of course, is not enough; one needs not only to make and store a record but also be able to consult it,

      It's amazing to think how much this number has exponentially grown since then, and how with external drives and the like, we can store even more than Bush was imagining in this comment and still easily access it through search functions.

    16. The investigator is staggered by the findings and conclusions of thousands of other workers—conclusions which he cannot find time to grasp, much less to remember, as they appear.

      This flood of information is one that, with the widespread access to and ability to add to the internet, has become largely exacerbated in the modern day. This is a result Bush may not have been able to predict in his proposals for new directions of information-sharing technology, and the issues he discusses with the then-current methods of information sharing are problems we still encounter today.

    17. Rapid electrical counting appeared soon after the physicists found it desirable to count cosmic rays. For their own purposes the physicists promptly constructed thermionic-tube equipment capable of counting electrical impulses at the rate of 100,000 a second. The advanced arithmetical machines of the future will be electrical in nature, and they will perform at 100 times present speeds, or more.Moreover, they will be far more versatile than present commercial machines, so that they may readily be adapted for a wide variety of operations. They will be controlled by a control card or film, they will select their own data and manipulate it in accordance with the instructions thus inserted, they will perform complex arithmetical computations at exceedingly high speeds, and they will record results in such form as to be readily available for distribution or for later further manipulation. Such machines will have enormous appetites. One of them will take instructions and data from a whole roomful of girls armed with simple key board punches, and will deliver sheets of computed results every few minutes. There will always be plenty of things to compute in the detailed affairs of millions of people doing complicated things.4The repetitive processes of thought are not confined however, to matters of arithmetic and statistics. In fact, every time one combines and records facts in accordance with established logical processes, the creative aspect of thinking is concerned only with the selection of the data and the process to be employed and the manipulation thereafter is repetitive in nature and hence a fit matter to be relegated to the machine. Not so much has been done along these lines, beyond the bounds of arithmetic, as might be done, primarily because of the economics of the situation. The needs of business and the extensive market obviously waiting, assured the advent of mass-produced arithmetical machines just as soon as production methods were sufficiently advanced.With machines for advanced analysis no such situation existed; for there was and is no extensive market; the users of advanced methods of manipulating data are a very small part of the population. There are, however, machines for solving differential equations—and functional and integral equations, for that matter. There are many special machines, such as the harmonic synthesizer which predicts the tides. There will be many more, appearing certainly first in the hands of the scientist and in small numbers.If scientific reasoning were limited to the logical processes of arithmetic, we should not get far in our understanding of the physical world. One might as well attempt to grasp the game of poker entirely by the use of the mathematics of probability. The abacus, with its beads strung on parallel wires, led the Arabs to positional numeration and the concept of zero many centuries before the rest of the world; and it was a useful tool—so useful that it still exists.

      Bush's description sounds like that of calculator. He discusses the extreme cost of creating a machine that can calculate problems efficiently, as well as its instability and unreliability. Now, calculators are widespread tools that are used by students and adults to solve mathematical equations and problems. They are widely used and manufactured with different levels of complexity (for instance, scientific calculators have more functions than simple calculators).

    18. Compression is important, however, when it comes to costs. The material for the microfilm Britannica would cost a nickel, and it could be mailed anywhere for a cent. What would it cost to print a million copies? To print a sheet of newspaper, in a large edition, costs a small fraction of a cent. The entire material of the Britannica in reduced microfilm form would go on a sheet eight and one-half by eleven inches. Once it is available, with the photographic reproduction methods of the future, duplicates in large quantities could probably be turned out for a cent apiece beyond the cost of materials. The preparation of the original copy? That introduces the next aspect of the subject.

      Here, it sounds as though Bush is describing the framework for a modern-day printer. Currently, we are able to print mass quantities of documents at a time. We have also branched out into using copy machines and scanners to upload, edit, and print documents. Printers are widely available and are used by people of every age, from children in elementary school to elders.

    19. They have improved his food, his clothing, his shelter; they have increased his security and released him partly from the bondage of bare existence. They have given him increased knowledge of his own biological processes so that he has had a progressive freedom from disease and an increased span of life. They are illuminating the interactions of his physiological and psychological functions, giving the promise of an improved mental health.

      This passage really stood out to me. In it, the author does a great job of illustrating the relationship between technology and the everyday world, including basic life processes that we often take for granted. For instance, increased access to online information has greatly improved our understanding of the human body, as well as the causes and cures for specific illnesses. As a result, we can self-diagnose our symptoms with the click of a mouse. Using this example, it is evident that technological developments have impacted every aspect of our lives, including the way we receive information and our understanding of the world around us.

    20. “Consider a future device …  in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.”

      This is most of our devices today. We use our technology for the main reason of communication

    21. The summation of human experience is being expanded at a prodigious rate, and the means we use for threading through the consequent maze to the momentarily important item is the same as was used in the days of square-rigged ships.

      He is saying that the way we use technology is like it is a necessity in our lives.

    22. To make the record, we now push a pencil or tap a typewriter. Then comes the process of digestion and correction, followed by an intricate process of typesetting, printing, and distribution.

      This is interesting because this is like trial and error for technology. Also, this is like making prototypes in technology today.

    23. If scientific reasoning were limited to the logical processes of arithmetic, we should not get far in our understanding of the physical world. One might as well attempt to grasp the game of poker entirely by the use of the mathematics of probability.

      This is very interesting to do because poker is a chance game.

    24. “Consider a future device …  in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.”

      it sounds like he is referencing a cellphone or computer

    25. With one item in its grasp, it snaps instantly to the next that is suggested by the association of thoughts, in accordance with some intricate web of trails carried by the cells of the brain. It has other characteristics, of course; trails that are not frequently followed are prone to fade, items are not fully permanent, memory is transitory. Yet the speed of action, the intricacy of trails, the detail of mental pictures, is awe-inspiring beyond all else in nature.

      The brain works like machines. Even with some differences, like the fact that people can't remember every single thing they process, their brain works like a web.

    26. Adding is only one operation

      It seems like this is a reference to PEMDAS. Not only do we have to use multiple operations to solve a problem; Bush suggests that we have to solve problems that use all these operations at the same time.

    27. Today we make the record conventionally by writing and photography, followed by printing; but we also record on film, on wax disks, and on magnetic wires

      Writing, photography, and film make up the backbone of Internet and mass media today. That's how we developed blogs, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, editing software, and much, much more.

    28. will the author of the future cease writing by hand or typewriter and talk directly to the record?

      There are several different technologies that do just this that are available to the public. It is amazing that Bush thought of this. Perhaps these technologies developed because Bush thought of this?

    29. Yet specialization becomes increasingly necessary for progress, and the effort to bridge between disciplines is correspondingly superficial.

      A lot of these specialties are complicated and require a lot of their own research, which means that they have to work on their own more than they work together.

    30. truly significant attainments become lost in the mass of the inconsequential

      Although information can now be shared easily and quickly, it does not mean that the important rises above the "inconsequential" any more. In anything, the internet has provided a vast "abyss" in which one could get lost for ages searching for the consequential.

    31. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.”

      This stands out to me because not only do electronics give us access to all sorts of information, but that information can leave a positive impact, hence "intimate supplement." For example, reading a book you love on Kindle or some other reading app gives you good memories of that book that will last a long time.

    32. security

      I find this interesting because the progression of technology in relation to the world wide web has created new dangers. In response, there have been new forms of ensuring security, but the danger from this technology still exists.

    33. The camera hound of the future wears on his forehead a lump a little larger than a walnut. It takes pictures 3 millimeters square, later to be projected or enlarged, which after all involves only a factor of 10 beyond present practice. The lens is of universal focus, down to any distance accommodated by the unaided eye, simply because it is of short focal length. There is a built-in photocell on the walnut such as we now have on at least one camera, which automatically adjusts exposure for a wide range of illumination. There is film in the walnut for a hundred exposures, and the spring for operating its shutter and shifting its film is wound once for all when the film clip is inserted. It produces its result in full color.

      What bush is talking about here sounds to me, at least like a GoPro camera. A camera that will take pictures for you but can not be viewed on the device, or at least not very well. But can be "projected" on to a larger screen for easier viewing, all of these things are modern technologies that we have today.

    34. The personnel officer of a factory drops a stack of a few thousand employee cards into a selecting machine, sets a code in accordance with an established convention, and produces in a short time a list of all employees who live in Trenton and know Spanish. Even such devices are much too slow when it comes, for example, to matching a set of fingerprints with one of five million on file. Selection devices of this sort will soon be speeded up from their present rate of reviewing data at a few hundred a minute. By the use of photocells and microfilm they will survey items at the rate of a thousand a second, and will print out duplicates of those selected.

      Bush's ideas about a selecting machine are not far of from how selecting and searching is done today. All of his ideas seem sound and modern but the application for how he thinks the tasks will be done is stuck in his time. He thinks there will be specific machines for specific tasks instead of one great machine that can do it all

    35. Wholly new forms of encyclopedias will appear, ready made with a mesh of associative trails running through them, ready to be dropped into the memex and there amplified. The lawyer has at his touch the associated opinions and decisions of his whole experience, and of the experience of friends and authorities. The patent attorney has on call the millions of issued patents, with familiar trails to every point of his client's interest. The physician, puzzled by a patient's reactions, strikes the trail established in studying an earlier similar case, and runs rapidly through analogous case histories, with side references to the classics for the pertinent anatomy and histology. The chemist, struggling with the synthesis of an organic compound, has all the chemical literature before him in his laboratory, with trails following the analogies of compounds, and side trails to their physical and chemical behavior.

      To me what he is talking about here just sounds like the internet. talking about the lawyer, or the physician, using the memex to find information they need just sounds like people searching for information online, checking different websites and articles.

    36. Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, "memex" will do. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.

      Computer. IPad. Smartphone. He has the right idea of what it will do but very very wrong about how it works and what it looks like.

    37. Now rapid selection can slide just the proper card into position in an instant or two, and return it afterward. Another difficulty occurs, however. Someone must read a total on the card, so that the machine can add its computed item to it. Conceivably the cards might be of the dry photography type I have described. Existing totals could then be read by photocell, and the new total entered by an electron beam.

      It is just done electronically with a computer. But Bush was right that it would be improved.

    38. If necessary, it could be made extremely fast by substituting thermionic-tube switching for mechanical switching, so that the full selection could be made in one one-hundredth of a second. No one would wish to spend the money necessary to make this change in the telephone system, but the general idea is applicable elsewhere.

      again, wrong about the way it would be done but also wrong of him to assume that this would never occur for the telephone.

    39. Selection devices of this sort will soon be speeded up from their present rate of reviewing data at a few hundred a minute. By the use of photocells and microfilm they will survey items at the rate of a thousand a second, and will print out duplicates of those selected.

      He was right that this process would be sped up but wrong about how it would do so.

    40. As he ponders over his notes in the evening, he again talks his comments into the record. His typed record, as well as his photographs, may both be in miniature, so that he projects them for examination.

      While Bush was wrong that the recorder would type what was said, he did get the recorder right. Also, he was half right of talking to Siri and your words appear on the screen. Lastly, one could argue that he thought of an Alexa like when she was told to do something like add "Eggs" to the shopping list.

    41. The Encyclopædia Britannica could be reduced to the volume of a matchbox. A library of a million volumes could be compressed into one end of a desk.

      Bush was right that we would be able to make normal sized things very small in terms of computer files, but he was wrong in how we would do it. He thought we would use some kind of microfilm when we are actually using bites of files.

    42. but someone may speed it up, and it has no grain difficulties such as now keep photographic researchers busy. Often it would be advantageous to be able to snap the camera and to look at the picture immediately.

      Bush called this one correctly. We can now see pictures immediately and without fear of grain.

    43. On a pair of ordinary glasses is a square of fine lines near the top of one lens, where it is out of the way of ordinary vision. When an object appears in that square, it is lined up for its picture. As the scientist of the future moves about the laboratory or the field, every time he looks at something worthy of the record, he trips the shutter and in it goes, without even an audible click.

      Similar to the idea of GoogleGlass, but still with the mind of old tech. There would be no shutter cord and it would not do this automatically.

    44. Certainly progress in photography is not going to stop. Faster material and lenses, more automatic cameras, finer-grained sensitive compounds to allow an extension of the minicamera idea, are all imminent. Let us project this trend ahead to a logical, if not inevitable, outcome. The camera hound of the future wears on his forehead a lump a little larger than a walnut. It takes pictures 3 millimeters square, later to be projected or enlarged, which after all involves only a factor of 10 beyond present practice. The lens is of universal focus, down to any distance accommodated by the unaided eye, simply because it is of short focal length. There is a built-in photocell on the walnut such as we now have on at least one camera, which automatically adjusts exposure for a wide range of illumination. There is film in the walnut for a hundred exposures, and the spring for operating its shutter and shifting its film is wound once for all when the film clip is inserted. It produces its result in full color.

      While Bush is right that camera's will get smaller and produce color photographs, a normal camera now uses no film and is not embedded on anyone's head. Bush was still thinking about the technology of the past (their present) and thus didn't fully realize what technological advances could occur with the camera.

    45. Now, says Dr. Bush, instruments are at hand which, if properly developed, will give man access to and command over the inherited knowledge of the ages.

      Bush likely didn't realize that this power would be in the hands of the every-man. With handheld computers being all the rage now. It seems Bush thought scientists would be the first to come up with this type of technology, probably for the government or something similar.

    46. On this are placed longhand notes, photographs, memoranda, all sorts of things. When one is in place, the depression of a lever causes it to be photographed onto the next blank space in a section of the memex film, dry photography being employed.

      A scanner

    47. For this reason there still come more machines to handle advanced mathematics for the scientist.

      Not just for scientists. Everyone can now do advanced mathematics with help of a computer or cellphone. Just type it in google.

    48. will the author of the future cease writing by hand or typewriter and talk directly to the record?

      Not just the author but everyone can do so. My dad does it whenever he wants to search something on his phone or send a text.

    49. Consider film of the same thickness as paper, although thinner film will certainly be usable.

      Or no film at all, just a digital version that records it on a device that can easily be transferred to a computer with just a cord.

    50. The cord which trips its shutter may reach down a man's sleeve within easy reach of his fingers.

      Now the common public has selfie sticks that take pictures on a phone that can do more than simply call someone.

    51. They have done their part on the devices that made it possible to turn back the enemy, have worked in combined effort with the physicists of our allies. They have felt within themselves the stir of achievement. They have been part of a great team. Now, as peace approaches, one asks where they will find objectives worthy of their best.

      This makes me think of A Farewell to Arms where one of the surgeons was considered the best in his field during WW1 but how his knowledge of amputation and dealing with bullet wounds would not work for him after he returned home from the war as that is not a common need when away from the battlefield.

    52. burying their old professional competition in the demand of a common cause, have shared greatly and learned much. It has been exhilarating to work in effective partnership. Now, for many, this appears to be approaching an end.

      What is interesting is how individuals still share their knowledge to create new things, artists and scientists collaborating together, but how there is still that tight restriction that controls what can be done. New inventions, artworks, music, and tools are still copyrighted and individuals must apply to work with them. You also have inventors that place an outrageous price tag on some of their products, limiting the number of people who can buy them and find out what things they can do that are beyond even the mind of the tool's creator.

    53. A memex is a device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.It consists of a desk, and while it can presumably be operated from a distance, it is primarily the piece of furniture at which he works. On the top are slanting translucent screens, on which material can be projected for convenient reading. There is a keyboard, and sets of buttons and levers. Otherwise it looks like an ordinary desk.

      A desktop computer, but via a transparency projector...in any case, fun that Bush named his early PC "meme." I'm imagining his concept of a network to accomplish this would be something of a vacuum-tube system.

    54. The personnel officer of a factory drops a stack of a few thousand employee cards into a selecting machine, sets a code in accordance with an established convention, and produces in a short time a list of all employees who live in Trenton and know Spanish. Even such devices are much too slow when it comes, for example, to matching a set of fingerprints with one of five million on file.

      Tonally, post-apocalyptic – there's a wonder at the future in this article, but also a strong current of fear. This very common, current technology reads like something straight out of 1984 – a book which would not be published for another 4 years.

    55. Two centuries ago Leibnitz invented a calculating machine which embodied most of the essential features of recent keyboard devices, but it could not then come into use. The economics of the situation were against it: the labor involved in constructing it, before the days of mass production, exceeded the labor to be saved by its use, since all it could accomplish could be duplicated by sufficient use of pencil and paper. Moreover, it would have been subject to frequent breakdown, so that it could not have been depended upon; for at that time and long after, complexity and unreliability were synonymous.

      Reminds me of the current struggle with things like quantum-computing and renewable energy. Their complexity and cost, in a capitalist economic system which values profit over all else, make it so that investing in technology which would improve over time or has the potential for greater uses down the line, just for the sake of improvement (or even for more pressing reasons) when their work can be replicated with existing technology no matter how laborious or harmful, is dis-incentivized.

    56. it has provided a record of ideas and has enabled man to manipulate and to make extracts from that record so that knowledge evolves and endures throughout the life of a race rather than that of an individual.

      Wikipedia anyone? Though, generally this seems like what would now be a reference to many institutions and libraries' efforts to digitize books, research, and culture – I doubt that Bush could have imagined (or wanted) the limitations on access to this information that broadly exist (or its use as a vector with which to make money).

    57. Science has provided the swiftest communication between individuals

      Seems a lot like internet messaging and texting – although I'd imagine here, Bush is talking about more basic telecommunications.

    1. However personal they may be, these hupomnemata ought not to be understood as intimate journals or as those accounts of spiritual experience (temptations, struggles, downfalls, and victories) that will be found in later Christian literature. They do not constitute a “narrative of oneself”; they do not have the aim of bringing to the light of day the arcana conscientiae, the oral or written confession of which has a purificatory value. The movement they seek to bring about is the reverse of that: the intent is not to pursue the unspeakable, nor to reveal the hidden, nor to say the unsaid, but on the contrary to capture the already-said, to collect what one has managed to hear or read, and for a purpose that is nothing less than the shaping of the self.

      Its interesting to me to think about instagram, twitter, tumblr as the modern hupomnemata. We use these technologies to document aspects of the self (often performatively), and in turn we tend to remember what we spend time documenting. The process of documenting also leads us to emphasize certain aspects of the self, which may in turn shape the self, for better or for worse.

    1. Can you afford to hire staff? The Council on Foundations has developed three basic examples to help you decide whether you can afford paid staff. The scenarios below roughly demonstrate the relationship between asset amounts, grant distribution, and staffing expenses. You make grants and do not provide direct charitable services. You want a permanent endowment. Your charitable budget is going to be in the range of 5 to 6 percent of assets The IRS mandated minimum annual charitable expenditure is 5 percent of assets. This includes grants and administrative expenses, but does not include investment management expenses. In the formulas below, we use the median foundation expenditure percentage of 5.5 percent for your charitable budget. No more than 15 percent of your annual charitable budget will be used for administrative expenses. Research by the Council on Foundations shows that the median charitable administrative expense level in relation to the total charitable budget for all private foundations is 8.6 percent. However, smaller foundations don't have the same economies of scale as larger foundations. Therefore, for smaller foundations we suggest that you assume that administrative expenses will be about 15 percent of your annual charitable budget. Annual legal and accounting fees will total $5,000. Depending upon the assets you have available, you may want to think about alternatives that can help you maximize your charitable dollars and choices for giving (see the "Additional Options" section below). Example 1: $1 Million Foundation (No Staff) Because of the small amount of money that should be devoted to administrative expenses (usually no more than 15 percent of your annual charitable budget), the option of hiring part-time staff is not financially prudent with a foundation of this size. Total Annual Charitable Budget $1,000,000 x .055 = $55,000 Assets x 5.5 percent = total annual charitable budget (grants + expenses) Administrative Costs $55,000 x .15 = $8,250 Total annual charitable budget x 15 percent = administrative budget Without paid staff, your administrative costs will reflect only your legal and accounting fees (estimated at $5,000), which in this case is 9 percent of your annual charitable budget. Volunteer Responsibilities Because in this scenario the foundation cannot realistically afford staff, it will be the responsibility of the donor and volunteer board to review all grant requests, go on site visits (as necessary), and handle all grantee correspondence, grantmaking investigations, and governance responsibilities of the foundation. If your grantmaking is focused and the grants are few in number, these responsibilities will be easier for you. These responsibilities can be extremely fulfilling when willingly undertaken. In preliminary responses to the Council's 2002 Foundation Management Survey, 93 percent of family foundation respondents reported that they feel inspired by their philanthropy. Example 2: $5 Million Foundation (Half-time CEO) Council on Foundations research shows the majority of private foundations with assets of $5 million to $9.9 million have part-time staff only. The following calculations assume your half-time CEO salary and benefits are $38,7501 and your annual legal and accounting fees are $5,000: Total Annual Charitable Budget $5,000,000 x .055 = $275,000 Assets x 5.5 percent = total annual charitable budget (grants + expenses) Administrative Costs $275,000 x .15 = $41,250 Total annual charitable budget x 15 percent = administrative budget In this case, because your total charitable budget is significantly larger than the previous example, you might consider the option of a half-time staff person. With your half-time CEO salary and benefits at $38,750 and your legal and accounting costs at approximately $5,000, administrative costs total $43,750, which exceeds the recommended 15 percent administrative ceiling. Therefore, you might consider hiring a lower-compensated staff person such as a program officer or administrative assistant, with the board retaining many responsibilities, or hiring a CEO with legal or accounting skills so that the $5,000 fee is reduced. Example 3: $10 Million Foundation (Half-Time CEO and Half-Time Administrative Assistant) In this case, your annual charitable budget is an amount that realistically allows you to consider the option of hiring a half-time CEO and a half-time administrative assistant. Assuming that your half-time CEO and half-time administrative assistant salary/benefits are $68,7502 and your annual legal and accounting fees are $5,000: Total Annual Charitable Budget $10,000,000 x .055 = $550,000 Assets x 5.5 percent = total annual charitable budget (grants + expenses) Administrative Costs $550,000 x .15 = $82,500 Total annual charitable budget x 15 percent = administrative budget Adding personnel and legal and accounting costs gives you a total of $73,750 for administrative costs. In this example, your administrative costs will be 13.4 percent of your annual charitable budget, which is below the 15 percent recommended ceiling. As noted above, there are many options available to manage a private foundation. Our research indicates that many families opt for more than one philanthropic tool, each fulfilling a different goal. For example, in preliminary data from the 2002 Foundation Management Survey, 11 percent of the family foundations responding also had donor advised funds at community foundations. The costs related to starting a foundation on the state level will vary from one state to the next and depend on the type of structure (e.g., trust or corporation, public charity, or private foundation) chosen for the foundation. State fees are paid with submission of required documents to the state office that is responsible for regulating charities; usually this is the secretary of state or the attorney general’s office. In addition, there are fees associated with seeking recognition of charity status with the IRS. Finally, there may be licensing or other fees required for operation of any business in a particular area.
    1. First, they have increased his control of his material environment. They have improved his food, his clothing, his shelter; they have increased his security and released him partly from the bondage of bare existence.

      It is amazing thinking of this in context of amazon and the amount of things we are able to buy and obtain in minutes without leaving the room...

    2. Had a Pharaoh been given detailed and explicit designs of an automobile, and had he understood them completely, it would have taxed the resources of his kingdom to have fashioned the thousands of parts for a single car, and that car would have broken down on the first trip to Giza.

      This is a really interesting comparison, and raises a good point. Cars have come a long way from what they originally were- and the number one reason for their development was market demand and competition which encouraged companies to start creating new models...and if people hadn't bothered buying the old models there would be no money for new ones...

    1. EHC: This is an excellent question, but we don’t know the answer for certain. I think the origin for some of them was the region of Sicily, Sardinia, and southern Italy (some of the groups are called the Shekelesh and the Shardana, which sound similar), but others most likely joined in along the way, as they moved from west to east across the Mediterranean. Consequently, there may have been others from what is present-day Greece and Turkey among the Sea Peoples as well.

      Humanity appears to have always been a base-normadic civilization, then and now.

    1. he was 6 foot 3, 6 foot 4 at that age.

      I noticed that Branch brings up Boogaard's height a lot and uses the word "big" repeatedly. As we go into Boogaard's past, we learn that he was picked on for his height and even though he kept a smile, he was still internally brought down by it. But I think his height is what fed him during hockey fights, he realizes that bigger is stronger in the hockey world and although he may not feel useful outside of the hockey world, he instead feels strong when the hockey game starts.

    1. if you tell people that they have a genetic predisposition to certain health characteristics, such as a low capacity for exercise or a tendency to overeat, their bodies start to respond accordingly. Even if their DNA does not actually contain the gene variants in question.

      I think if someone does tell you about this genetic disposition about overeating or not exercising, and our body tends to respond differently it's because our mind is telling our body that we need to slow down and watch what we eat and then we make plans to go to the gym or for runs.

    1. "defamiliarization": how to tell a well-known tale so as to "make it new."4

      The ability to take a well known social issue like the slave trade and present it in a different way than it has been throughout history (rendering it unfamiliar to readers), brings a new light to the topic and can be very powerful in magnifying public perception.

      I see this concept carried over into a lot of the publishing produced today in a variety of ways. I've even came across a post on the internet that I think used defamiliarization to describe Disney movies in a disturbing way: "Girl kidnapped by a man driven insane by his grotesque disfigurement grows to love her captor in a case study of Stockholm Syndrome." (Beauty and the Beast)

      Using defamiliarization in writing helps us to truly see a story or idea again, since we may have become desensitized to it from seeing it on a daily basis.

    1. I think this is such a powerful statement. It is very important that we as educators are finding new and efficient ways of learning so that every student can understand and soak in new information. It is so crucial that you know your students and know that everyone learns in a different way and may not be able to understand the way others do.

  2. Dec 2018
    1. The Museum of Viral Memory’s House Mac, Vicki, reading User 23187425’s search queries (from I feel better after I type to you):

      Vime writes: "Visit Lot49 and read the text for yourself. As well, take the time to read the comments on Mr. Claburn's blog about user 23187425. There is a great deal of conjecture, and perhaps the beginning of an outline of who or what made these wonderfully enigmatic searches. The voice of Vicki may be more appropriate than we initially imagined." Perhaps the voice of Vicki, a robotic computer default, may be especially appropriate in reading this text due to the methodical nature of the entires (approximately every 30 seconds) or, as a commentator from Search-ID: Psychic analysis of AOL users and their search logs writes, "I think something else is going on here, though I'd have no idea how and why…". Perhaps something in the search-engine backend holds clues about this user's search history.

    1. Narrator: The danger of their new occupation helped cultivate an air of reckless bravado among the pilots of the Escadrille. “If I should be killed in this war,” one of Chapman’s fellow pilots wrote home, “I will at least die as a man should.” Michael Neiberg, Historian: They throw outlandish parties. They have two lion cubs, Whiskey and Soda, as their mascots. Celebrities from all over Europe want to have dinner with them, want to see them. So they have this devil-may-care attitude. They don’t really need the French army’s discipline. The French army needs them more than they need the French army. They fly in their bathrobes. They do more or less whatever they want. Narrator: The Lafayette Escadrille made headlines in the United States and an American film crew arrived in France to chronicle the exploits of Victor Chapman and his fellow aviators. Voice: Victor Chapman: Dear Father, [We] roared and buzzed . . . past the camera man, up into the air. Then one at a time we rushed by him. I must say that he had nerve. . . You will see it all, I expect, sometime this summer; for it is to be given to some American cinema company in Paris Andrew Carroll, Writer: They’re very popular and regardless of what Americans felt about the war itself, these guys were in a way heroes. They were kind of like the early astronauts. Narrator: For all their fame, and often reckless bravery, the pilots of the Lafayette Escadrille understood that the odds against their survival were daunting. On June 23rd, Victor Chapman dove into a dogfight, trying to rescue some of his comrades. He shot down three German planes, before being overwhelmed, his plane riddled with bullets. He became the first American flier to give his life for France. A French friend of the Chapman’s wrote to Victor’s father shortly after his death. “I have just left the Church . . . after attending the service in honor of your son… The self sacrifice of this one who comes to us, and places himself at our side, for no other reason than to make right triumph over wrong, is worthy of . . . honor. America has sent us this sublime youth, and our gratitude for him is such that it flows back upon his country.” Richard Rubin, Writer: They were handsome, well-bred young men who went off to do what they thought was right, even though the United States didn’t want to get involved in the fight at that point. And they were flying airplanes which captured the imagination of the entire world. To this day, the image that we think of often when we think of World War I is an aviator with his goggles and his leather cap and his long silk scarf. They were a very tiny minority of any fighting force. But they were, in essence, the face that all the armies wanted to show the enemy and the world.

      How did war shape masculinity?

    2. Horrified by what the war had become, in April of 1915, a group of delegates from the Woman’s Peace Party set off for the International Congress of Women, in The Hague. The WPP numbered more than 40,000 women nationwide, and their goal was the creation of an internationally sanctioned framework for an end to the war. The president was Jane Addams. Helen Zoe Veit, Historian: Jane Addams was in some ways the preeminent progressive. She founded a settlement house in Chicago called Hull House that was a place where immigrants and poor people could go to get help, to get education. She toured the country as a lecturer, in the name of peace. She was one of the most visible women in America at this time. Narrator: “We do not think that by raising our hands we can make the armies cease slaughter.” Addams admitted, “[But] we do think it is fitting that women should meet and take counsel to see what may be done.” One of the peace movement’s harshest critics, former president, Theodore Roosevelt, lashed out at Addams and her fellow pacifists.  “It is base and evil to clamor for peace in the abstract,” he thundered, “when silence is kept about concrete and hideous wrongs done to humanity at this very moment.”  The women were undeterred. Roosevelt was a “barbarian”, they responded, “out of his element” and “half a century out of date. More than a thousand women, from 12 different nations, attended the conference, including representatives from Germany and Austria-Hungary. Kimberly Jensen, Historian: Addams and women from many nations gathered to say war must end, and we must not engage in this conflict. The world has come too far to allow a barbarous war like this to happen and to really destroy what we have built. She saw alliances among women across national boundaries to be a very important pathway to peace. Michael Kazin, Historian: The reason why Jane Addams and other pacifist feminists go to The Hague is to put pressure on Wilson to get involved in really backing up with actions what he’s been saying all along which is that it is the role of the United States to help mediate the war. And so in a sense this is a citizen’s peace initiative which is trying to nudge Wilson to do the right thing.   Narrator: On her return to America, Jane Addams met with Wilson six times. Christopher Capozzola, Historian: He hears from her about what she’s seen in Europe. And I think it clearly influences him by making him think that his instinct that America should have a leadership role in settling the peace is a correct one.

      How did women's pacificsm lead to involvement in politics?

    1. NewsNightly NewsMeet the PressDatelineMSNBCTODAYSearchSponsored ByHalf of women in STEM have experienced gender discrimination at work, study finds Share this —U.S. newsHalf of women in STEM have experienced gender discrimination at work, study finds An Assistant Professor of Genetics and Developmental Biology works on stem cells.Spencer Platt / Getty Images filemps._execAd("interstitial");Breaking News EmailsGet breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.SUBSCRIBEJan. 9, 2018 / 2:26 PM CST / Updated Jan. 9, 2018 / 2:26 PM CSTBy Elizabeth ChuckHalf of all women working in science, technology, engineering and math have experienced gender discrimination at work, according to a new study released the day after a disgraced Google engineer filed a lawsuit claiming white conservative men are the true victims of Silicon Valley.James Damore was fired from Google after writing a 10-page memo citing women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer female workers in high-stress jobs at the search giant. The lawsuit he filed Monday argues that Google was so overly concerned with filling gender and racial quotas that it was hurting male employees as well as potential male employees.Video Will Begin In...3Fired Google engineer James Damore defends his manifesto about diversityAug. 10, 201702:34But a study out on Tuesday from the Pew Research Center, which polled more than 4,900 workers in the U.S., found that in the traditionally male-dominated fields of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), only 19 percent of men said they had experienced gender discrimination at work, versus 50 percent of women.mps._execAd("boxinline");In certain STEM subsets, the proportion of women reporting discrimination was even higher: 78 percent of those who work in majority-male workplaces reported gender discrimination, followed by 74 percent of those working in computer jobs.Even outside of STEM, the numbers were high, with 41 percent of women in non-STEM jobs saying they've dealt with discrimination, the Pew study found."The challenges that women in STEM face often echo the challenges of all working women," said Cary Funk, lead author of the report and Pew's director of science and society research. "What the study does is take a broad-based look at the issues facing the STEM workforce. I think they really speak to the complex issues surrounding diversity in the workplace."The Pew study, which was conducted last July and August, before Hollywood's sexual misconduct scandal led to a national reckoning, also polled women on sexual harassment. Both groups were equally likely to say they had experienced sexual harassment at work — 22 percent.mps._execAd("boxinline",0,1,false);Both groups were less likely than their male counterparts to think that women are "usually treated fairly" when it comes to opportunities for promotion and advancement.RecommendedVideo Will Begin In...3Penny Marshall, famed actress and comedian, dead at 75Video Will Begin In...3Actress Penny Marshall dead at 75Damore's viewpoint, both in and outside of Google, is disputed. Google faces a separate suit filed by three women who allege the company pays women less than men for similar work and gives them less opportunity for promotions, bonuses and raises — a claim Google denies.Stephanie Newby, the CEO of Crimson Hexagon, an artificial intelligence company that provides consumer insights based on publicly available data, said she was "not at all surprised" by Pew's findings.In 2004, Newby founded Golden Seeds, an investment firm that provides capital to women-led businesses. At Crimson Hexagon, she said she has made a point of hiring and promoting qualified female candidates after seeing first-hand the challenges that women entrepreneurs and women in male-oriented jobs face.mps._execAd("boxinline",0,2,false);"We need environments where women can thrive, not be cornered about how they look or have to think about the kinds of things that make them worry about being different or trying to prove themselves, because so much energy can be expended on that instead of getting the job done," she said. "I think it provides a competitive advantage for us that we have women in senior positions."by Taboolaby TaboolaSPONSORED STORIESNationLandlines Are Disappearing with This Increasingly Popular OptionNationUndoExperianWhat is Alternative Credit Data?ExperianUndoby Taboolaby TaboolaSPONSORED STORIESDroneX ProThis $99 Drone Might Be The Most Amazing Invention In 2018DroneX ProUndoMy Smart Gadgets19 Insanely Cool Gadgets That Are Going To Sell Out This YearMy Smart GadgetsUndoUSA TodayMilitary Dad Comes Home To Unexpected ReactionUSA TodayUndogo.gadgetspost.com23 Cool Products Flying Off Shelves These Holidaysgo.gadgetspost.comUndoMicrosoft AzureHere’s What Makes An Azure Free Account So Valuable...Microsoft AzureUndoGadgets PostThe 19 Best Products Of 2018 RankedGadgets PostUndoTactical WatchMilitary Watch Everybody in United States is Talking AboutTactical WatchUndoTact WatchFinally. The Smart Watch Every Man In United States Has Been Waiting For!Tact WatchUndoU.S. newsSenate passes sweeping criminal justice reform billThe House is expected to take up the Senate version of the bill at a later date before sending it to the president.Senate Majority Leader Republican Mitch McConnell speaks during a news conference on negotiations to avoid a partial shutdown of the federal government on Capitol Hill on Dec. 18, 2018.Michael Reynolds / EPABreaking News EmailsGet breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.SUBSCRIBEDec. 18, 2018 / 8:02 PM CST / Updated 8:38 PM CSTBy Rebecca Shabad and Phil HelselWASHINGTON — The Senate passed a huge criminal law reform bill on Tuesday night, seizing on bipartisan support for the broadest set of changes to federal crime statutes in a generation.A rare coalition of conservatives, liberals, activists, prosecutors and defense attorneys — spanning the political spectrum — pushed senators to pass the "First Step Act" by a final vote of 87-12.mps._execAd("boxinline",0,3,false);The House is expected to take up the Senate version of the bill at a later date. The House passed a similar version of the bill back in May by a wide margin, 360-59.President Donald Trump announced in November that he backs the legislation.Supporters of the bill claim that changes passed in the Senate would make America's criminal justice system fairer, reduce overcrowding and save taxpayer dollars — much to the benefit of drug and non-violent offenders.The bill would not affect state prisons. It only covers federal prisoners, who make up less than 10 percent of America's prison population.mps._execAd("boxinline",0,4,false);Trump quickly jumped on Twitter to hail the bill’s passage, and said "America is the greatest Country in the world and my job is to fight for ALL citizens, even those who have made mistakes.""This will keep our communities safer, and provide hope and a second chance, to those who earn it. In addition to everything else, billions of dollars will be saved. I look forward to signing this into law!” the president tweeted.Durbin: Kushner 'very important partner' in passing criminal justice reform billDec. 18, 201802:44The Senate bill overcame late obstacles by Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and John Kennedy, R-La.RecommendedSchool district police officer hit and run caught on cameraMcConnell convinced government shutdown won't happenCotton railed against the First Step Act as a "jailbreak" and said too many crimes were being included to allow prisoners consideration for early release.mps._execAd("boxinline",0,5,false);Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, in urging senators to reject an amendment sponsored by Cotton, said “this law is centered towards those people that are the least violent people that are in prison already," and that “we’re only going to help low-level offenders.""Let's see if we can keep our bipartisan coalition together, to pass a bill that the president said that he is ready to sign," Grassley said. The amendment was defeated.A major provision of the bill gives judges more leeway to diverge from strict mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenders with criminal histories.House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., tweeted after the Senate vote: "Criminal justice reform is about giving more Americans a chance at redemption. The House looks forward to sending it to the president to become law."Rebecca ShabadRebecca Shabad is a congressional reporter for NBC News, based in Washington.Phil HelselPhil Helsel is a reporter for NBC News.David K. Li and Frank Thorp V contributed.MORE FROM newsAboutContactCareersPrivacy policyTerms of ServiceSiteMapAdvertiseAdChoices© 2018 NBC UNIVERSAL

      What is our praxis here? What do we advocate for here? The whole article is just stating problems.

    1. Individualism is a concept that is highlighted in every motivational spiel, but does it really exist? The child in me would like to believe that it does, but I cannot ignore the clones that wandered the hallways of my high school. Society promotes individuality, yet there are little to no changes in our tendency to conform. As teenagers, we want to fit in, so we follow the crowd. Who would willingly outcast themselves from society? Even beyond high school, we are naturally inclined to assimilate ourselves into a community. That is why, when words such as “individuality” are defined, it seems a little far-fetched. The Merriam-Webster dictionary states that individuality is a “total character peculiar to and distinguishing an individual from others.” Is it possible to be this unique? Or are we unconsciously mimicking those around us? To what extent are we influenced by social norms and the behaviors of others?

      In my first draft, the introductory paragraph was a weak set up for the remainder of the essay. I not only failed to hook the audience, but I also questioned the existence of individualism without explaining why I had those doubts. The paragraph as a whole was rushed and impersonal. In the final draft, I had to split the introductory paragraph into two. I wanted to use the opening paragraphs to successfully introduce individuality and explain why its existence may be farfetched. I switched to first person to give the essay a more personal, dynamic feel; I introduced my high school to catch the audience's attention and explain why I, as a writer, feel passionate about this topic. By using the definition of individualism and the anecdote of my high school, I think I am able to effectively convince my audience that this is a question worth exploring.

    1. I stood under the beating sun, my shoes covered in rust-colored dirt, as the Himba (an indigenous Namibian tribe)’s signature earthly smell from the clay they use to cover their bodies wafted into my nostrils. My family had just presented the tribe with some gifts as a sign of respect, but there was no way to communicate what our gifts were to be used for, or any way to tell if they were pleased, offended, or simply confused. At the time, I was too focused on the obvious language barrier, but as I look back, I realize that maybe I couldn’t tell what the Himba were thinking because they used body language or wore facial expressions different than the ones we were used to. Although judging someone’s emotion based on what we see may be considered an innate ability, perception of facial expressions of emotion may actually be culturally bound. For example, would someone in Arkansas be able to tell what someone in Japan is feeling, just from the expression on their face? When traveling, I often wonder if it is just the language barrier that impedes tourists and locals from understanding each other, or if there is more in the way of full comprehension between these two groups, such as the way people convey their emotions through the expressions on their faces. 

      I deleted my whole introduction and replaced it with this vignette to engage the reader and show why my topic matters to me. Originally, I was never satisfied with how I started the paper and thought I had a weak introduction but wasn't sure how to change it. Although I knew why I was interested in the topic, I tried to go deeper and think about what might've influenced my interest and realized it came from interacting with people of different cultures from a young age.

    1. I think this deserves a longer annotation. I suspect that the "let's get on with it" sentiment, as attractive as it is, may be unrealistic for a couple of reasons First, the tools being leveraged are not uniquely employed by traditional humanities disciplines. When the topic modelling community consists of social scientists and search engine creators, there will inevitably be talk about how they can be applied within the context of literary criticism. Second, the lit crit field itself has passed through a period in which those who do not examine their methods critically are stamped as committers of the most heinous intellectual (and political) crimes. When digital humanists engage in such introspection, however, the terms in which they do so are so foreign that those who follow more traditional paradigms tend to have knee-jerk reactions. So the problem will probably never go away. But you are right that we can get on with our own research and satisfy ourselves that we have learnt something. Ultimately, achieving a critical mass of people who can use DH methods to do so will quiet down some of the angst.

      As an added note, much of the defensiveness and polemic dates back five years or so. It's worthwhile looking at Andrew Piper's Enumerations to see the difference in tone in 2018.

    1. shouldn’t struggle to find employment

      Interesting. Thus far I have seen a tremendous problem with government jobs. I have seen first hand how people with guaranteed jobs can be difficult, lack motivation and bring down the rest of the team. Not sure that guaranteeing a job is a great thing. As with the two issues above, Medicare and Housing, your solution is to increase the role of government. But each time you cite a government program that should take the responsibility we find corruption, complexity and/or inefficiency. So, can it be done? Sure. But at what cost? Is the main issue really that there are structural barriers to employment? I am not sure.

      How will you assess success. Is 100% employment the measure of a successful plan? Would you cut other assistance programs since now all people would be able to pay for all their needs? How will you pay the estimated $200-400B required to enact this plan? Oh, yeah, a tax on the middle class, again.

      Just a few things to think about.

      Minimum wage laws tend to increase unemployment. I know, you may say it's those evil capitalist again, squeezing the working person. But no, the majority of businesses in America are small businesses. 89% of all firms have fewer than 20 workers.

      https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=NES_2015_00A1&prodType=table

      So, minimum wage laws are a great way of hurting the small business, the majority of business, in favor of the large business. If a mom and pop store has to pay wages that are higher than what they can afford, they will either cut employees or cut hours, or cut low skilled workers and hire only skilled workers. In Seattle in 2016, there was an attempt to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. The net result was decrease in low-skilled jobs, and an expansion of large businesses.

      So, minimum wages sound great, but they tend to concentrate wealth in the hands of the already wealthy. Unintended consequences of well-intentioned policies.

      There is a theme here. Good intentions with a particularly marxian point of view inevitably lead to bad results.

      What is the role of a low-paying job. The role has always been as a training ground for inexperienced workers to have a sort of internship where they learn basic job skills. Then they move on to better jobs. We know that this is still how low-wage jobs function. These are valuable places of transition. They are entry points into the market.

    2. Medicare For All +

      Love this idea. I really want all people to have optimal health. Good health benefits the individual and the greater community.

      However, expanding a poorly running system seems like a bad idea.

      The costs of Medicare for All for 10 years are estimated to be about $32 trillion, according to the Mercatus Center, a free market-oriented think tank at George Mason University, as well as an earlier study by the Urban Institute's Health Policy Center.

      Cortez has no way of paying for this. So, it has to be paid for by the middle class, as all things are. If you tax the rich, that may not increase revenue. Cortez claims $2T in increased revenues by taxing the rich. Revenue sometimes goes up when there are tax cuts, sometimes when there are tax increases. Just wishing that more revenue will come from taxing the "rich" has no inherent truthfulness to it.

      Medicare and health care in the US is several times more expensive than similar systems in Europe. Why? I don't see her analysis of why the best universal system, that of the UK can cost about $3,400 per person, whereas in the US the cost is $8,500. Expanding this expensive, inefficient system to all people seems like a bad idea. Why not propose a better system?

      Unlike most European countries, in the USA pharmaceuticals are allowed to market directly to consumers. Plans similar to Medicare may work out well in Europe, but the exact same plan will have drastically different end results in America.

      She claims that prices for co-pays, premiums and deductibles are skyrocketing under our current health system that includes The Affordable Care Act. How is this going to be any different under Medicare for All? Medicare prices are rising. Compared to European models, Medicare participants pay a lot more and get a lot less.

      Medicare as of 2018 is drawing down its trust fund assets. The fund will be depleted by 2026. So, we can't even keep the current Medicare alive, how is Cortez going to pay for Medicare for All? Wishful thinking and good intentions cannot pay for it. The only people that will end up paying are the diminishing middle class.

      Medicare is bloated, complex and inefficient. So, unless I see more specifics on this plan (Medicare for All) and how it will differ from Medicare, how it will cut prices, how it will limit pharmaceutical's direct access to consumers, and how this plan is not just expansion of a decrepit system, I am not convinced at all.

      Sources: Comparison of health care systems: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2014/jun/mirror-mirror-wall-2014-update-how-us-health-care-system

      UK: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/05/americans-uk-health-system-trump-nhs

    1. Any given book_ of his library /_and presumably other textual material, such as notes/ can thus be called up and consulted with far greater facility than if it were taken from a shelf

      This passage in Vannevar Bush's "As We May Think" may be the first mention of what we now think of as digital annotation. The passage in the original article is slighly different... you can see it here.

    1. An alien . . . whose removal is unlikely in the reasonably foreseeable future, may be detained for additional periods of up to six months only if the release of the alien will threaten the national security of the United States or the safety of the community or any person.

      The government can detain someone for as long as they want if they think the person might be dangerous. That seems to go against due process, but at the same time it might prevent a terrorist attack. It seems are we are sacrificing privacy for security .

    1. n particular, describing all struggles against imperialism as ‘decolonizing’ creates a convenient ambiguity between decolonization and social justice work,especially among people of color, queer people, and other groups minoritized by the settler nation-state. ‘We are all colonized,’ may be a true statement but is deceptively embracive and vague, its inference: ‘None of us are settlers.’ Equivocation, or callingeverything by the same name, is a move towards innocence that is especially vogue in coalition politics among people of color

      Category 1: Close Reading

      This passage reminds me a little of the Paris reading we did last week. I don't think these two are saying the same message (altough I would imagine the authors would agree with each other), however, I think there is a link between what both authors are saying. The commonality I found is that both authors are saying we need to be better in the language we use. Some of the things we are saying -- "none of us are settlers", "cultural relevance" -- aren't helping make change happen.

      This passage in particular is reminds me of the phrase "all lives matter". This phrase is, as the passage says, "creates a convenient ambiguity between decolonization and social justice work, especially among people of color, queer people, and other groups minoritized by the settler nation-state." Saying "all lives matter" is blatantly ignoring the actual issues that sparked the "Black lives matter" movement in addition to trying to relieve responsability from themselves. This language and ideology does nothing to actually work towards any form of decolonization.

    2. ather, because the prevalence of the adoption narrativein American literature, film, television, holidays and history books far exceeds the actual occurrences of adoptions, we are interested in how this narrative spins a fantasy that an individual settler can become innocent, indeed heroic and indigenized, against a backdrop of national guilt. The adoption fantasy is the mythical trump card desired by critical settlers who feel remorse about settler colonialism, one that absolves them from the inheritance of settler crimes and that bequeaths a new inheritance of Native-ness and claims to land (which is a reaffirmation of what the settler project has been all along).

      Category 1: Opinion

      I have encountered instances of people doing this to justify their cultural appropriation. I have had people who are racialized as White tell me that it's okay for them to wear certain forms of tradtional, culturally and historically rooted dress. Their reasoning was because they know a lot about the history and culture regarding the dress. However, I think it's important to point out that you may have knowledge of every aspect of a certain culture, but that knowledge does not translate into ownership or absolution from Whiteness/coloniality.

  3. Nov 2018
    1. However, we can all think of examples in which the music does not match what appears to be developing as part of the visual narrative and dialogue. For example, in the context of a slasher film, if several fun-loving teenagers are talking and laughing amongst themselves, but mid-conversation the musical score introduces an ominous, low synthesizer tone (a la Alan Howarth horror film scores), the incongruity between the laughing teenagers and the menacing musical sound will trigger an emotional response in the viewer-listener. In such situations, while the visual portion of the film may portray one meaning, the musical score is allowed to express a different (in this case, underlying psychological) meaning, providing a sense of foreboding…a harbinger of unpleasant events likely to follow.

      A great example of when scene and music do not align, but the music leads viewers to what should be expected in the near future. The music manipulates audience members to portray a scene within a scene.

    1. n the latter half of the 20th century, youth participated in social movements?from the Civil Rights Movement to the recent WTO demonstrations (McAdam, 1988; Tarrow, 1998). However, the lack of a recent social movement that follows previous models of focusing on a single, monolithic issue may be linked to what Foucault (1994) describes as the diffuse and dispersed ways in which power and oppression operate in the current period. P

      I think the youth has started to find their voice again. we're being heard. we just need to be listened to.

    1. These days I tend to think of dystopias as being fashionable, perhaps lazy, maybe even complacent, because one pleasure of reading them is cozying into the feeling that however bad our present moment is, it’s nowhere near as bad as the ones these poor characters are suffering through. Vicarious thrill of comfort as we witness/imagine/experience the heroic struggles of our afflicted protagonists—rinse and repeat. Is this catharsis? Possibly more like indulgence, and creation of a sense of comparative safety. A kind of late-capitalist, advanced-nation schadenfreude about those unfortunate fictional citizens whose lives have been trashed by our own political inaction. If this is right, dystopia is part of our all-encompassing hopelessness. On the other hand, there is a real feeling being expressed in them, a real sense of fear. Some speak of a “crisis of representation” in the world today, having to do with governments—that no one anywhere feels properly represented by their government, no matter which style of government it is. Dystopia is surely one expression of that feeling of detachment and helplessness. Since nothing seems to work now, why not blow things up and start over? This would imply that dystopia is some kind of call for revolutionary change. There may be something to that. At the least dystopia is saying, even if repetitiously and unimaginatively, and perhaps salaciously, Something’s wrong. Things are bad.
    1. Models such as these might lead us to suspect that what we need may be less an innovation in the delivery system for higher education today than a new conception of the community that we are building both within our institutions and between those institutions and the public they should serve

      This discussion reminds me of a few episodes of season one of the podcast Revisionist History by Malcolm Gladwell. He discusses philanthropy, university grants and how different models can support either 1) a few geniuses or 2) many average people. Here is a link to what I think is the correct episode (but it's worth listening to them all to get to the point, if you're interested in the topic of educational equity. Also: it is definitely just an amazing podcast!)

      http://revisionisthistory.com/episodes/06-my-little-hundred-million

    1. because mainstream readers often do not understand our prose, they are able to assume (sometimes dismissively, and sometimes defensively) that the ideas it contains are overblown and unimportant

      I think this is another important point, though I may just be throwing repeat statements. As people putting out knowledge to the public, we should aim to write in a way that makes our work approachable without compromising its arguments. Michelle's recommendation for training graduate students in different methods of scholarly communication below is a great idea.

    1. support a multi-enumerator environment and the potential for quantitative analysis of observations drawn from shadowing.

      The choice to develop coding after the shadowing is interesting. I can certainly see the advantages based on the discussion that follows. Are there disadvantages to this? I had expected that the coding would be defined in advance. I wonder if there are advantages to defining the coding scheme in advance? This may merit discussion. Even if the author does not think there are advantages it may be worth noting. Often times in social science we want the enumeration process, the coding process, or other stages of the data collection/coding to be independent of one another to avoid bias. So, for example, when administering lab experiments, often times the researchers administering the experiments do not know what the research question is. Or when coding text data the coders often times do not know what the RQ is. Here the author is suggesting that the coder use the information learned from the shadow notes to inform the coding scheme. There are clearly merits to this approach, but the tradeoffs may merit a bit more discussion.

    1. Sahih al-Bukhari 4986 Zayd ibn Thabit said: Abu Bakr sent for me at the time of the battle of al-Yamama, and ‘Umar ibn al-Kattab was with him. Abu Bakr said: ‘Umar has come to me and said, “Death raged at the battle of al-Yamama and took many of the reciters of the Qur’an. I fear lest death in battle overtake the reciters of the Qur’an in the provinces and a large part of the Qur’an be lost. I think you should give orders to collect the Qur’an.” “What?” I asked ‘Umar, “Will you do something which the Prophet of God himself did not do?” “By God,” replied ‘Umar, “it would be a good deed.” ‘Umar did not cease to urge me until God opened my heart to this and I thought as ‘Umar did. Zayd continued: Abu Bakr said to me, “You are a young man, intelligent, and we see no fault in you, and you have already written down the revelation for the Prophet of God, may God bless and save him. Therefore go and seek the Qur’an and assemble it.” By God, if he had ordered me to move a mountain it would not have been harder for me than his order to collect the Qur’an. “What?” I asked, “Will you do something which the Prophet of God himself, may God bless and save him, did not do?” “By God,” replied Abu Bakr, “it would be a good deed.” And he did not cease to urge me until God opened my heart to this as he had opened the hearts of Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. Then I sought out and collected the parts of the Qur’an, whether written on palm leaves or flat stones or in the hearts of men. Thus I found the end of the Surah of Repentance, which I had been unable to find anywhere else, with Abu’l-Khuzayma al-Ansari. These were the verses: “There came to you a Prophet from among yourselves. It grieves him that you sin . . .” to the end. The leaves were with Abu Bakr until his death, then with ‘Umar as long as he lived, and then with Hafsa the daughter of ‘Umar.

      Abu Bakr tells Zayd that because of a war happening many Muslims are dying. He then tells Zayd to collect the Quran. Zayd says he can't do it but Umar says that It would be a good deed. Abu tells him to collect the Quran and Zayd says no, and Abu says that it would be a good deed. After that Zayd went to collect parts of the Quran. This shows how much they revered the Quran.

    1. how the theory that intelli-gence is fixed and unchangeable can lead students to in-terpret academic challenges as a sign that they may lackintelligence

      I think that this is huge especially in elementary school. Since the students are so young, they are all at different developmental levels and educational levels. So when they see their classmates succeeding while they are struggling, they automatically think they are dumb. I often found myself thinking these things as well. If we can change this mindset, students will be more willing to face challenges

    1. de!ne issues of public concern and to exercise power in relation to them.

      I like how the authors included this aspect as well. I think sometimes that we forget about the voice that we have as individuals when we think about strictly solitary actions, as there are many people who may feel and think the same as us

    1. Recently a young woman was gang raped in a university in Nigeria, I think some of us know about that. And the response of many young Nigerians, both male and female, was something along the lines of this: "Yes, rape is wrong. But what is a girl doing in a room with four boys?" Now, if we can forget the horrible inhumanity of that response, these Nigerians have been raised to think of women as inherently guilty, and they have been raised to expect so little of men that the idea of men as savage beings without any control is somehow acceptable. We teach girls shame. "Close your legs." "Cover yourself." We make them feel as though by being born female they're already guilty of something. And so, girls grow up to be women who cannot see they have desire. They grow up to be women who silence themselves. They grow up to be women who cannot say what they truly think, and they grow up -- and this is the worst thing we did to girls -- they grow up to be women who have turned pretense into an art form.

      The fact that we always ask why she was there instead of helping the female who was the victim of a gang rape is just disappointing in a way because we focus more on the fact that SHE was with multiple males, not the fact that we all know that gang rape is wrong and the fact that the males had the nerve to touch a female in such a way is sickening. They have go through out their life traumatized with the fact that this happen to her, possibly making them see a therapist, taking their lives, or living in fear of most me, yet us as people have the nerve to say that she should have covered themselves or closed her legs because of how she dressed that day while she was with them or how she acted around them that may have "sent a hint" to the males in some impossible way.

    2. Now, when a woman says, "I did it for peace in my marriage," she's usually talking about giving up a job, a dream, a career. We teach females that in relationships, compromise is what women do. We raise girls to see each other as competitors -- not for jobs or for accomplishments, which I think can be a good thing, but for attention of men. We teach girls that they cannot be sexual beings in the way that boys are. If we have sons, we don't mind knowing about our sons' girlfriends. But our daughters' boyfriends? God forbid.

      As Adichie said, we tend teach young women to compete for the attention of some young man that they may like, whether that women be a teenager or at least in her 20's (it may be a bigger age but we'll stick a smaller one for the sake of the explanation) and sometimes, it's indirect due to, for example, if the young female is in highschool...since normally you see this issue often here, more than in the real world (unless you look at social media, then you see it more frequently).

    1. n terms of “intimacy” and “openness,” those are traits that we might consider feminine versus perhaps maybe thicker walls, and things that are stronger, and privacy as things that are masculine.Suzanne: I think of Zaha, one of the first female architects that “shifted the plane” and went with softer angles. So softening the plane of an environment, and making things more circular — no square sides at all — it’s more fluid, and we’re seeing a lot more fluidity in workplaces.

      Q: How exactly does the layout of a company encourage or discourage women from joining the workforce? Would it be more fair to say that this feeling of acceptance is contingent upon the people who actually comprise the company?

      Speculative Response: While that may be true in some regard, the layout subtly indicates the overall preferences and beliefs of the company itself, thus either encouraging or discouraging women from joining the company.

    1. o unified military to step in to end the uprisings,

      I feel as an Egyptian who was not directly involved in the revolution, but still followed it closely and was directly affected by many of the outcomes and events, that a lot of both media and Egyptian people themselves were fixed in the romanticism of revolution as a whole. It’s very scary to think of a military coup as liberation. But many Egyptians believed in the perhaps too idealistic notion that some just some simple and peaceful protests would easily bring the swift action of the good-willed and honorable military to dispose of the former regime (here’s a song from the time to show how highly we praised the military - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dskl5eMNmco ). In contrast, Diab’s film paints a much more real image (at some points uncomfortably so) of the daily scenes on the streets during this revolution time. This could present as a shock to many Egyptians that were still involved in the revolution, but may not have actually been on the streets, per se.

    1. He desires to preserve the Government, that it may be administered for all as it was administered by the men who made it. Loyal citizens everywhere have the right to claim this of their government, and the government has no right to withhold or neglect it.

      Constitution is theirs despite not wanting it. I think we have a lot of conflict still in this realm. Some don't see the Constitution as their protection so unnecessary in the 14th, for example, but essential in the 2nd Amendment.

    1. I think this looks great and it should make a great template for further inquiries from other sources in the future! I agree with Prof Kleinman about the year time frame, that's where the rest of the project starts. Another idea we could consider would be to try to look at time frames that correspond with Ben Schmidt's humanities crisis time frames. However...like you say, that's a lot of local news transcripts. The tricking thing is that we don't know how much useable data we will get from one year vs 10 years...but we know that we will get a lot of raw data to sort through when they send us big chunks of time. Processing transcript data for our purposes may prove pretty time consuming so we want to consider that. I'm not sure, as you note, what they would be able to give us, so maybe its good to ask for more and accept less...?

      Anyway I think it's brilliant, Thank you Leo!

  4. Oct 2018
    1. Ex­orcise is good for you, and human beings are past the point at which Na­ture is a help. Our continued survival, and therefore the survival of the planet we're now dominating beyond all doubt, depends on our thinking past Nature.

      This quote seems to hold a lot of weight to it and by saying that we can basically put nature aside is a rather bold statement. I believe that nature is part of the equation and although we may need to think outside of the box, i do not think it has to be in such a drastic manner. The fact that nature is a "ghost" seems a little ambiguous as well. In my opinion nature is not a ghost but most definitely a material concept.

    1. The memex is the name of the hypothetical proto-hypertext system that Vannevar Bush described in his 1945 The Atlantic Monthly article "As We May Think".

      memex

    1.  "What a sublime conception is that of a last judgment!" said he, -- "a righting of all the wrongs of ages! -- a solving of all moral problems, by an unanswerable wisdom! It is, indeed, a wonderful image."    "It is a fearful one to us," said Miss Ophelia.    "It ought to be to me, I suppose," said St. Clare stopping, thoughtfully. "I was reading to Tom, this afternoon, that chapter in Matthew that gives an account of it, and I have been quite struck with it. One should have expected some terrible enormities charged to those who are excluded from Heaven, as the reason; but no, -- they are condemned for not doing positive good, as if that included every possible harm."    "Perhaps," said Miss Ophelia, "it is impossible for a person who does no good not to do harm."    "And what," said St. Clare, speaking abstractedly, but with deep feeling, "what shall be said of one whose own heart, whose education, and the wants of society, have called in vain to some noble purpose; who has floated on, a dreamy, neutral spectator of the struggles, agonies, and wrongs of man, when he should have been a worker?"    "I should say," said Miss Ophelia, "that he ought to repent, and begin now."    "Always practical and to the point!" said St. Clare, his face breaking out into a smile. "You never leave me any time for general reflections, Cousin; you always bring me short up against the actual present; you have a kind of eternal now, always in your mind."    "Now is all the time I have anything to do with," said Miss Ophelia.    "Dear little Eva, -- poor child!" said St. Clare, "she had set her little simple soul on a good work for me."    It was the first time since Eva's death that he had ever said as many words as these to her, and he spoke now evidently repressing very strong feeling. -451-    "My view of Christianity is such," he added, "that I think no man can consistently profess it without throwing the whole weight of his being against this monstrous system of injustice that lies at the foundation of all our society; and, if need be, sacrificing himself in the battle. That is, I mean that I could not be a Christian otherwise, though I have certainly had intercourse with a great many enlightened and Christian people who did no such thing; and I confess that the apathy of religious people on this subject, their want of perception of wrongs that filled me with horror, have engendered in me more scepticism than any other thing."    "If you knew all this," said Miss Ophelia, "why didn't you do it?"    "O, because I have had only that kind of benevolence which consists in lying on a sofa, and cursing the church and clergy for not being martyrs and confessors. One can see, you know, very easily, how others ought to be martyrs."    "Well, are you going to do differently now?" said Miss Ophelia.    "God only knows the future," said St. Clare. "I am braver than I was, because I have lost all; and he who has nothing to lose can afford all risks."    "And what are you going to do?"    "My duty, I hope, to the poor and lowly, as fast as I find it out," said St. Clare, "beginning with my own servants, for whom I have yet done nothing; and, perhaps, at some future day, it may appear that I can do something for a whole class; something to save my country from the disgrace of that false position in which she now stands before all civilized nations."    "Do you suppose it possible that a nation ever will voluntarily emancipate?" said Miss Ophelia.    "I don't know," said St. Clare. "This is a day of great deeds. Heroism and disinterestedness are rising up, here and there, in the earth. The Hungarian nobles -452- set free millions of serfs, at an immense pecuniary loss; and, perhaps, among us may be found generous spirits, who do not estimate honor and justice by dollars and cents."    "I hardly think so," said Miss Ophelia.    "But, suppose we should rise up to-morrow and emancipate, who would educate these millions, and teach them how to use their freedom? They never would rise to do much among us. The fact is, we are too lazy and unpractical, ourselves, ever to give them much of an idea of that industry and energy which is necessary to form them into men. They will have to go north, where labor is the fashion, -- the universal custom; and tell me, now, is there enough Christian philanthropy, among your northern states, to bear with the process of their education and elevation? You send thousands of dollars to foreign missions; but could you endure to have the heathen sent into your towns and villages, and give your time, and thoughts, and money, to raise them to the Christian standard? That's what I want to know. If we emancipate, are you willing to educate? How many families, in your town, would take a negro man and woman, teach them, bear with them, and seek to make them Christians? How many merchants would take Adolph, if I wanted to make him a clerk; or mechanics, if I wanted him taught a trade? If I wanted to put Jane and Rosa to a school, how many schools are there in the northern states that would take them in? how many families that would board them? and yet they are as white as many a woman, north or south. You see, Cousin, I want justice done us. We are in a bad position. We are the more obvious oppressors of the negro; but the unchristian prejudice of the north is an oppressor almost equally severe."    "Well, Cousin, I know it is so," said Miss Ophelia, -- "I know it was so with me, till I saw that it was my duty to overcome it; but, I trust I have overcome it; and I know there are many good people at the -453- north, who in this matter need only to be taught what their duty is, to do it. It would certainly be a greater self-denial to receive heathen among us, than to send missionaries to them; but I think we would do it."    "You would I know," said St. Clare. "I'd like to see anything you wouldn't do, if you thought it your duty!"    "Well, I'm not uncommonly good," said Miss Ophelia. "Others would, if they saw things as I do. I intend to take Topsy home, when I go. I suppose our folks will wonder, at first; but I think they will be brought to see as I do. Besides, I know there are many people at the north who do exactly what you said."    "Yes, but they are a minority; and, if we should begin to emancipate to any extent, we should soon hear from you."    Miss Ophelia did not rely. There was a pause of some moments; and St. Clare's countenance was overcast by a sad, dreamy expression.    "I don't know what makes me think of my mother so much, to-night," he said."I have a strange kind of feeling, as if she were near me. I keep thinking of things she used to say. Strange, what brings these past things so vividly back to us, sometimes!"    St. Clare walked up and down the room for some minutes more, and then said,

      Why must he repent before dying? Why does he see his mother?

    1. They engage in safety behaviors, such as rehearsing exactly what to say in aconversation,

      I do believe this is very common, even in people who don't have SAD. For an example, If you go for an interview tomorrow, there are many people who i'm sure will be having a conversation with themselves in the shower or just in general, making up questions that the interviewer may ask you and you will come up with the best answers you can think of for those questions. Another example would be a first date. I know that my friends and I would always ask eachother what we could say to the guy if theres a time where no one is saying anything. Then, we would come up with questions and answers, just incase it was awkward.

    2. Recent evidence has suggested that people with SAD are actuallyconcerned with both positive and negative evaluation.

      Although i think it is true that people with SAD are concerned with both negative and positive evaluations i definitely think the greater emphasis is placed on the negative aspect of an evaluation process because as humans and social creatures we prefer to be seen in a positive light although i can understand the anxiety in being evaluated positively because it does raise expectations that people may see as impossible to maintain. But being seen negatively can greatly dampen a persons self esteem and willingness to try to do better and may also create more anxiety as more pressure is placed on an individual to do better especially if they felt they did their best during the first evaluation. overall, SAD has both a negative and positive component with a greater contribution to anxiety from the negative component.

    1. The wider public is not, in fact, a major consumer of OA research, George Monbiot notwithstanding. OA may have benefits from the point of view of the consumption of knowledge, but it is less clear that it has equivalent benefits from the perspective of the production of knowledge and, more importantly, the ecology of that production (which includes publishers aligned with academic interests and our learned societies and associations).

      It is far too soon in the transition to OA (which I believe is inevitable even if the business models are as yet unknown), to know what the many benefits will be. And, we in North America and Europe need to think more expansively and listen to researchers in other parts of the world (see, for instance, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/10/25/ask-the-community-and-chefs-how-can-we-achieve-equitable-participation-in-open-research-part-2/).

  5. allred720fa18.commons.gc.cuny.edu allred720fa18.commons.gc.cuny.edu
    1. The advancing speck was observed by the blacks. Their shouts attracted the attention of Don Benito, who, with a return of courtesy, approaching Captain Delano, expressed satisfaction at the coming of some supplies, slight and temporary as they must necessarily prove. Captain Delano responded; but while doing so, his attention was drawn to something passing on the deck below: among the crowd climbing the landward bulwarks, anxiously watching the coming boat, two blacks, to all appearances accidentally incommoded by one of the sailors, violently pushed him aside, which the sailor someway resenting, they dashed him to the deck, despite the earnest cries of the oakum-pickers. “Don Benito,” said Captain Delano quickly, “do you see what is going on there? Look!” But, seized by his cough, the Spaniard staggered, with both hands to his face, on the point of falling. Captain Delano would have supported him, but the servant was more alert, who, with one hand sustaining his master, with the other applied the cordial. Don Benito restored, the black withdrew his support, slipping aside a little, but dutifully remaining within call of a whisper. Such discretion was here evinced as quite wiped away, in the visitor’s eyes, any blemish of impropriety which might have attached to the attendant, from the indecorous conferences before mentioned; showing, too, that if the servant were to blame, it might be more the master’s fault than his own, since, when left to himself, he could conduct thus well. His glance called away from the spectacle of disorder to the more pleasing one before him, Captain Delano could not avoid again congratulating his host upon possessing such a servant, who, though perhaps a little too forward now and then, must upon the whole be invaluable to one in the invalid’s situation. “Tell me, Don Benito,” he added, with a smile–“I should like to have your man here, myself–what will you take for him? Would fifty doubloons be any object?” “Master wouldn’t part with Babo for a thousand doubloons,” murmured the black, overhearing the offer, and taking it in earnest, and, with the strange vanity of a faithful slave, appreciated by his master, scorning to hear so paltry a valuation put upon him by a stranger. But Don Benito, apparently hardly yet completely restored, and again interrupted by his cough, made but some broken reply. Soon his physical distress became so great, affecting his mind, too, apparently, that, as if to screen the sad spectacle, the servant gently conducted his master below. Left to himself, the American, to while away the time till his boat should arrive, would have pleasantly accosted some one of the few Spanish seamen he saw; but recalling something that Don Benito had said touching their ill conduct, he refrained; as a shipmaster indisposed to countenance cowardice or unfaithfulness in seamen. While, with these thoughts, standing with eye directed forward towards that handful of sailors, suddenly he thought that one or two of them returned the glance and with a sort of meaning. He rubbed his eyes, and looked again; but again seemed to see the same thing. Under a new form, but more obscure than any previous one, the old suspicions recurred, but, in the absence of Don Benito, with less of panic than before. Despite the bad account given of the sailors, Captain Delano resolved forthwith to accost one of them. Descending the poop, he made his way through the blacks, his movement drawing a queer cry from the oakum-pickers, prompted by whom, the negroes, twitching each other aside, divided before him; but, as if curious to see what was the object of this deliberate visit to their Ghetto, closing in behind, in tolerable order, followed the white stranger up. His progress thus proclaimed as by mounted kings-at-arms, and escorted as by a Caffre guard of honor, Captain Delano, assuming a good-humored, off-handed air, continued to advance; now and then saying a blithe word to the negroes, and his eye curiously surveying the white faces, here and there sparsely mixed in with the blacks, like stray white pawns venturously involved in the ranks of the chess-men opposed. While thinking which of them to select for his purpose, he chanced to observe a sailor seated on the deck engaged in tarring the strap of a large block, a circle of blacks squatted round him inquisitively eying the process. The mean employment of the man was in contrast with something superior in his figure. His hand, black with continually thrusting it into the tar-pot held for him by a negro, seemed not naturally allied to his face, a face which would have been a very fine one but for its haggardness. Whether this haggardness had aught to do with criminality, could not be determined; since, as intense heat and cold, though unlike, produce like sensations, so innocence and guilt, when, through casual association with mental pain, stamping any visible impress, use one seal–a hacked one. Not again that this reflection occurred to Captain Delano at the time, charitable man as he was. Rather another idea. Because observing so singular a haggardness combined with a dark eye, averted as in trouble and shame, and then again recalling Don Benito’s confessed ill opinion of his crew, insensibly he was operated upon by certain general notions which, while disconnecting pain and abashment from virtue, invariably link them with vice. If, indeed, there be any wickedness on board this ship, thought Captain Delano, be sure that man there has fouled his hand in it, even as now he fouls it in the pitch. I don’t like to accost him. I will speak to this other, this old Jack here on the windlass. He advanced to an old Barcelona tar, in ragged red breeches and dirty night-cap, cheeks trenched and bronzed, whiskers dense as thorn hedges. Seated between two sleepy-looking Africans, this mariner, like his younger shipmate, was employed upon some rigging–splicing a cable–the sleepy-looking blacks performing the inferior function of holding the outer parts of the ropes for him. Upon Captain Delano’s approach, the man at once hung his head below its previous level; the one necessary for business. It appeared as if he desired to be thought absorbed, with more than common fidelity, in his task. Being addressed, he glanced up, but with what seemed a furtive, diffident air, which sat strangely enough on his weather-beaten visage, much as if a grizzly bear, instead of growling and biting, should simper and cast sheep’s eyes. He was asked several questions concerning the voyage–questions purposely referring to several particulars in Don Benito’s narrative, not previously corroborated by those impulsive cries greeting the visitor on first coming on board. The questions were briefly answered, confirming all that remained to be confirmed of the story. The negroes about the windlass joined in with the old sailor; but, as they became talkative, he by degrees became mute, and at length quite glum, seemed morosely unwilling to answer more questions, and yet, all the while, this ursine air was somehow mixed with his sheepish one. Despairing of getting into unembarrassed talk with such a centaur, Captain Delano, after glancing round for a more promising countenance, but seeing none, spoke pleasantly to the blacks to make way for him; and so, amid various grins and grimaces, returned to the poop, feeling a little strange at first, he could hardly tell why, but upon the whole with regained confidence in Benito Cereno. How plainly, thought he, did that old whiskerando yonder betray a consciousness of ill desert. No doubt, when he saw me coming, he dreaded lest I, apprised by his Captain of the crew’s general misbehavior, came with sharp words for him, and so down with his head. And yet–and yet, now that I think of it, that very old fellow, if I err not, was one of those who seemed so earnestly eying me here awhile since. Ah, these currents spin one’s head round almost as much as they do the ship. Ha, there now’s a pleasant sort of sunny sight; quite sociable, too. His attention had been drawn to a slumbering negress, partly disclosed through the lacework of some rigging, lying, with youthful limbs carelessly disposed, under the lee of the bulwarks, like a doe in the shade of a woodland rock. Sprawling at her lapped breasts, was her wide-awake fawn, stark naked, its black little body half lifted from the deck, crosswise with its dam’s; its hands, like two paws, clambering upon her; its mouth and nose ineffectually rooting to get at the mark; and meantime giving a vexatious half-grunt, blending with the composed snore of the negress. The uncommon vigor of the child at length roused the mother. She started up, at a distance facing Captain Delano. But as if not at all concerned at the attitude in which she had been caught, delightedly she caught the child up, with maternal transports, covering it with kisses. There’s naked nature, now; pure tenderness and love, thought Captain Delano, well pleased. This incident prompted him to remark the other negresses more particularly than before. He was gratified with their manners: like most uncivilized women, they seemed at once tender of heart and tough of constitution; equally ready to die for their infants or fight for them. Unsophisticated as leopardesses; loving as doves. Ah! thought Captain Delano, these, perhaps, are some of the very women whom Ledyard saw in Africa, and gave such a noble account of. These natural sights somehow insensibly deepened his confidence and ease. At last he looked to see how his boat was getting on; but it was still pretty remote. He turned to see if Don Benito had returned; but he had not. To change the scene, as well as to please himself with a leisurely observation of the coming boat, stepping over into the mizzen-chains, he clambered his way into the starboard quarter-gallery–one of those abandoned Venetian-looking water-balconies previously mentioned–retreats cut off from the deck. As his foot pressed the half-damp, half-dry sea-mosses matting the place, and a chance phantom cats-paw–an islet of breeze, unheralded, unfollowed–as this ghostly cats-paw came fanning his cheek; as his glance fell upon the row of small, round dead-lights–all closed like coppered eyes of the coffined–and the state-cabin door, once connecting with the gallery, even as the dead-lights had once looked out upon it, but now calked fast like a sarcophagus lid; and to a purple-black tarred-over, panel, threshold, and post; and he bethought him of the time, when that state-cabin and this state-balcony had heard the voices of the Spanish king’s officers, and the forms of the Lima viceroy’s daughters had perhaps leaned where he stood–as these and other images flitted through his mind, as the cats-paw through the calm, gradually he felt rising a dreamy inquietude, like that of one who alone on the prairie feels unrest from the repose of the noon. He leaned against the carved balustrade, again looking off toward his boat; but found his eye falling upon the ribbon grass, trailing along the ship’s water-line, straight as a border of green box; and parterres of sea-weed, broad ovals and crescents, floating nigh and far, with what seemed long formal alleys between, crossing the terraces of swells, and sweeping round as if leading to the grottoes below. And overhanging all was the balustrade by his arm, which, partly stained with pitch and partly embossed with moss, seemed the charred ruin of some summer-house in a grand garden long running to waste. Trying to break one charm, he was but becharmed anew. Though upon the wide sea, he seemed in some far inland country; prisoner in some deserted château, left to stare at empty grounds, and peer out at vague roads, where never wagon or wayfarer passed. But these enchantments were a little disenchanted as his eye fell on the corroded main-chains. Of an ancient style, massy and rusty in link, shackle and bolt, they seemed even more fit for the ship’s present business than the one for which she had been built. Presently he thought something moved nigh the chains. He rubbed his eyes, and looked hard. Groves of rigging were about the chains; and there, peering from behind a great stay, like an Indian from behind a hemlock, a Spanish sailor, a marlingspike in his hand, was seen, who made what seemed an imperfect gesture towards the balcony, but immediately as if alarmed by some advancing step along the deck within, vanished into the recesses of the hempen forest, like a poacher. What meant this? Something the man had sought to communicate, unbeknown to any one, even to his captain. Did the secret involve aught unfavorable to his captain? Were those previous misgivings of Captain Delano’s about to be verified? Or, in his haunted mood at the moment, had some random, unintentional motion of the man, while busy with the stay, as if repairing it, been mistaken for a significant beckoning? Not unbewildered, again he gazed off for his boat. But it was temporarily hidden by a rocky spur of the isle. As with some eagerness he bent forward, watching for the first shooting view of its beak, the balustrade gave way before him like charcoal. Had he not clutched an outreaching rope he would have fallen into the sea. The crash, though feeble, and the fall, though hollow, of the rotten fragments, must have been overheard. He glanced up. With sober curiosity peering down upon him was one of the old oakum-pickers, slipped from his perch to an outside boom; while below the old negro, and, invisible to him, reconnoitering from a port-hole like a fox from the mouth of its den, crouched the Spanish sailor again. From something suddenly suggested by the man’s air, the mad idea now darted into Captain Delano’s mind, that Don Benito’s plea of indisposition, in withdrawing below, was but a pretense: that he was engaged there maturing his plot, of which the sailor, by some means gaining an inkling, had a mind to warn the stranger against; incited, it may be, by gratitude for a kind word on first boarding the ship. Was it from foreseeing some possible interference like this, that Don Benito had, beforehand, given such a bad character of his sailors, while praising the negroes; though, indeed, the former seemed as docile as the latter the contrary? The whites, too, by nature, were the shrewder race. A man with some evil design, would he not be likely to speak well of that stupidity which was blind to his depravity, and malign that intelligence from which it might not be hidden? Not unlikely, perhaps. But if the whites had dark secrets concerning Don Benito, could then Don Benito be any way in complicity with the blacks? But they were too stupid. Besides, who ever heard of a white so far a renegade as to apostatize from his very species almost, by leaguing in against it with negroes? These difficulties recalled former ones. Lost in their mazes, Captain Delano, who had now regained the deck, was uneasily advancing along it, when he observed a new face; an aged sailor seated cross-legged near the main hatchway. His skin was shrunk up with wrinkles like a pelican’s empty pouch; his hair frosted; his countenance grave and composed. His hands were full of ropes, which he was working into a large knot. Some blacks were about him obligingly dipping the strands for him, here and there, as the exigencies of the operation demanded. Captain Delano crossed over to him, and stood in silence surveying the knot; his mind, by a not uncongenial transition, passing from its own entanglements to those of the hemp. For intricacy, such a knot he had never seen in an American ship, nor indeed any other. The old man looked like an Egyptian priest, making Gordian knots for the temple of Ammon. The knot seemed a combination of double-bowline-knot, treble-crown-knot, back-handed-well-knot, knot-in-and-out-knot, and jamming-knot. At last, puzzled to comprehend the meaning of such a knot, Captain Delano addressed the knotter:– “What are you knotting there, my man?” “The knot,” was the brief reply, without looking up. “So it seems; but what is it for?” “For some one else to undo,” muttered back the old man, plying his fingers harder than ever, the knot being now nearly completed. While Captain Delano stood watching him, suddenly the old man threw the knot towards him, saying in broken English–the first heard in the ship–something to this effect: “Undo it, cut it, quick.” It was said lowly, but with such condensation of rapidity, that the long, slow words in Spanish, which had preceded and followed, almost operated as covers to the brief English between. For a moment, knot in hand, and knot in head, Captain Delano stood mute; while, without further heeding him, the old man was now intent upon other ropes. Presently there was a slight stir behind Captain Delano. Turning, he saw the chained negro, Atufal, standing quietly there. The next moment the old sailor rose, muttering, and, followed by his subordinate negroes, removed to the forward part of the ship, where in the crowd he disappeared. An elderly negro, in a clout like an infant’s, and with a pepper and salt head, and a kind of attorney air, now approached Captain Delano. In tolerable Spanish, and with a good-natured, knowing wink, he informed him that the old knotter was simple-witted, but harmless; often playing his odd tricks. The negro concluded by begging the knot, for of course the stranger would not care to be troubled with it. Unconsciously, it was handed to him. With a sort of congé, the negro received it, and, turning his back, ferreted into it like a detective custom-house officer after smuggled laces. Soon, with some African word, equivalent to pshaw, he tossed the knot overboard. All this is very queer now, thought Captain Delano, with a qualmish sort of emotion; but, as one feeling incipient sea-sickness, he strove, by ignoring the symptoms, to get rid of the malady. Once more he looked off for his boat. To his delight, it was now again in view, leaving the rocky spur astern. The sensation here experienced, after at first relieving his uneasiness, with unforeseen efficacy soon began to remove it. The less distant sight of that well-known boat–showing it, not as before, half blended with the haze, but with outline defined, so that its individuality, like a man’s, was manifest; that boat, Rover by name, which, though now in strange seas, had often pressed the beach of Captain Delano’s home, and, brought to its threshold for repairs, had familiarly lain there, as a Newfoundland dog; the sight of that household boat evoked a thousand trustful associations, which, contrasted with previous suspicions, filled him not only with lightsome confidence, but somehow with half humorous self-reproaches at his former lack of it. “What, I, Amasa Delano–Jack of the Beach, as they called me when a lad–I, Amasa; the same that, duck-satchel in hand, used to paddle along the water-side to the school-house made from the old hulk–I, little Jack of the Beach, that used to go berrying with cousin Nat and the rest; I to be murdered here at the ends of the earth, on board a haunted pirate-ship by a horrible Spaniard? Too nonsensical to think of! Who would murder Amasa Delano? His conscience is clean. There is some one above. Fie, fie, Jack of the Beach! you are a child indeed; a child of the second childhood, old boy; you are beginning to dote and drule, I’m afraid.” Light of heart and foot, he stepped aft, and there was met by Don Benito’s servant, who, with a pleasing expression, responsive to his own present feelings, informed him that his master had recovered from the effects of his coughing fit, and had just ordered him to go present his compliments to his good guest, Don Amasa, and say that he (Don Benito) would soon have the happiness to rejoin him. There now, do you mark that? again thought Captain Delano, walking the poop. What a donkey I was. This kind gentleman who here sends me his kind compliments, he, but ten minutes ago, dark-lantern in had, was dodging round some old grind-stone in the hold, sharpening a hatchet for me, I thought. Well, well; these long calms have a morbid effect on the mind, I’ve often heard, though I never believed it before. Ha! glancing towards the boat; there’s Rover; good dog; a white bone in her mouth. A pretty big bone though, seems to me.–What? Yes, she has fallen afoul of the bubbling tide-rip there. It sets her the other way, too, for the time. Patience. It was now about noon, though, from the grayness of everything, it seemed to be getting towards dusk. The calm was confirmed. In the far distance, away from the influence of land, the leaden ocean seemed laid out and leaded up, its course finished, soul gone, defunct. But the current from landward, where the ship was, increased; silently sweeping her further and further towards the tranced waters beyond. Still, from his knowledge of those latitudes, cherishing hopes of a breeze, and a fair and fresh one, at any moment, Captain Delano, despite present prospects, buoyantly counted upon bringing the San Dominick safely to anchor ere night. The distance swept over was nothing; since, with a good wind, ten minutes’ sailing would retrace more than sixty minutes, drifting. Meantime, one moment turning to mark “Rover” fighting the tide-rip, and the next to see Don Benito approaching, he continued walking the poop. Gradually he felt a vexation arising from the delay of his boat; this soon merged into uneasiness; and at last–his eye falling continually, as from a stage-box into the pit, upon the strange crowd before and below him, and, by-and-by, recognizing there the face–now composed to indifference–of the Spanish sailor who had seemed to beckon from the main-chains–something of his old trepidations returned. Ah, thought he–gravely enough–this is like the ague: because it went off, it follows not that it won’t come back. Though ashamed of the relapse, he could not altogether subdue it; and so, exerting his good-nature to the utmost, insensibly he came to a compromise. Yes, this is a strange craft; a strange history, too, and strange folks on board. But–nothing more. By way of keeping his mind out of mischief till the boat should arrive, he tried to occupy it with turning over and over, in a purely speculative sort of way, some lesser peculiarities of the captain and crew. Among others, four curious points recurred: First, the affair of the Spanish lad assailed with a knife by the slave boy; an act winked at by Don Benito. Second, the tyranny in Don Benito’s treatment of Atufal, the black; as if a child should lead a bull of the Nile by the ring in his nose. Third, the trampling of the sailor by the two negroes; a piece of insolence passed over without so much as a reprimand. Fourth, the cringing submission to their master, of all the ship’s underlings, mostly blacks; as if by the least inadvertence they feared to draw down his despotic displeasure. Coupling these points, they seemed somewhat contradictory. But what then, thought Captain Delano, glancing towards his now nearing boat–what then? Why, Don Benito is a very capricious commander. But he is not the first of the sort I have seen; though it’s true he rather exceeds any other. But as a nation–continued he in his reveries–these Spaniards are all an odd set; the very word Spaniard has a curious, conspirator, Guy-Fawkish twang to it. And yet, I dare say, Spaniards in the main are as good folks as any in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Ah good! At last “Rover” has come. As, with its welcome freight, the boat touched the side, the oakum-pickers, with venerable gestures, sought to restrain the blacks, who, at the sight of three gurried water-casks in its bottom, and a pile of wilted pumpkins in its bow, hung over the bulwarks in disorderly raptures. Don Benito, with his servant, now appeared; his coming, perhaps, hastened by hearing the noise. Of him Captain Delano sought permission to serve out the water, so that all might share alike, and none injure themselves by unfair excess. But sensible, and, on Don Benito’s account, kind as this offer was, it was received with what seemed impatience; as if aware that he lacked energy as a commander, Don Benito, with the true jealousy of weakness, resented as an affront any interference. So, at least, Captain Delano inferred. In another moment the casks were being hoisted in, when some of the eager negroes accidentally jostled Captain Delano, where he stood by the gangway; so, that, unmindful of Don Benito, yielding to the impulse of the moment, with good-natured authority he bade the blacks stand back; to enforce his words making use of a half-mirthful, half-menacing gesture. Instantly the blacks paused, just where they were, each negro and negress suspended in his or her posture, exactly as the word had found them–for a few seconds continuing so–while, as between the responsive posts of a telegraph, an unknown syllable ran from man to man among the perched oakum-pickers. While the visitor’s attention was fixed by this scene, suddenly the hatchet-polishers half rose, and a rapid cry came from Don Benito. Thinking that at the signal of the Spaniard he was about to be massacred, Captain Delano would have sprung for his boat, but paused, as the oakum-pickers, dropping down into the crowd with earnest exclamations, forced every white and every negro back, at the same moment, with gestures friendly and familiar, almost jocose, bidding him, in substance, not be a fool. Simultaneously the hatchet-polishers resumed their seats, quietly as so many tailors, and at once, as if nothing had happened, the work of hoisting in the casks was resumed, whites and blacks singing at the tackle. Captain Delano glanced towards Don Benito. As he saw his meagre form in the act of recovering itself from reclining in the servant’s arms, into which the agitated invalid had fallen, he could not but marvel at the panic by which himself had been surprised, on the darting supposition that such a commander, who, upon a legitimate occasion, so trivial, too, as it now appeared, could lose all self-command, was, with energetic iniquity, going to bring about his murder. The casks being on deck, Captain Delano was handed a number of jars and cups by one of the steward’s aids, who, in the name of his captain, entreated him to do as he had proposed–dole out the water. He complied, with republican impartiality as to this republican element, which always seeks one level, serving the oldest white no better than the youngest black; excepting, indeed, poor Don Benito, whose condition, if not rank, demanded an extra allowance. To him, in the first place, Captain Delano presented a fair pitcher of the fluid; but, thirsting as he was for it, the Spaniard quaffed not a drop until after several grave bows and salutes. A reciprocation of courtesies which the sight-loving Africans hailed with clapping of hands. Two of the less wilted pumpkins being reserved for the cabin table, the residue were minced up on the spot for the general regalement. But the soft bread, sugar, and bottled cider, Captain Delano would have given the whites alone, and in chief Don Benito; but the latter objected; which disinterestedness not a little pleased the American; and so mouthfuls all around were given alike to whites and blacks; excepting one bottle of cider, which Babo insisted upon setting aside for his master. Here it may be observed that as, on the first visit of the boat, the American had not permitted his men to board the ship, neither did he now; being unwilling to add to the confusion of the decks. Not uninfluenced by the peculiar good-humor at present prevailing, and for the time oblivious of any but benevolent thoughts, Captain Delano, who, from recent indications, counted upon a breeze within an hour or two at furthest, dispatched the boat back to the sealer, with orders for all the hands that could be spared immediately to set about rafting casks to the watering-place and filling them. Likewise he bade word be carried to his chief officer, that if, against present expectation, the ship was not brought to anchor by sunset, he need be under no concern; for as there was to be a full moon that night, he (Captain Delano) would remain on board ready to play the pilot, come the wind soon or late. As the two Captains stood together, observing the departing boat–the servant, as it happened, having just spied a spot on his master’s velvet sleeve, and silently engaged rubbing it out–the American expressed his regrets that the San Dominick had no boats; none, at least, but the unseaworthy old hulk of the long-boat, which, warped as a camel’s skeleton in the desert, and almost as bleached, lay pot-wise inverted amidships, one side a little tipped, furnishing a subterraneous sort of den for family groups of the blacks, mostly women and small children; who, squatting on old mats below, or perched above in the dark dome, on the elevated seats, were descried, some distance within, like a social circle of bats, sheltering in some friendly cave; at intervals, ebon flights of naked boys and girls, three or four years old, darting in and out of the den’s mouth. “Had you three or four boats now, Don Benito,” said Captain Delano, “I think that, by tugging at the oars, your negroes here might help along matters some. Did you sail from port without boats, Don Benito?” “They were stove in the gales, Señor.” “That was bad. Many men, too, you lost then. Boats and men. Those must have been hard gales, Don Benito.” “Past all speech,” cringed the Spaniard. “Tell me, Don Benito,” continued his companion with increased interest, “tell me, were these gales immediately off the pitch of Cape Horn?” “Cape Horn?–who spoke of Cape Horn?” “Yourself did, when giving me an account of your voyage,” answered Captain Delano, with almost equal astonishment at this eating of his own words, even as he ever seemed eating his own heart, on the part of the Spaniard. “You yourself, Don Benito, spoke of Cape Horn,” he emphatically repeated. The Spaniard turned, in a sort of stooping posture, pausing an instant, as one about to make a plunging exchange of elements, as from air to water. At this moment a messenger-boy, a white, hurried by, in the regular performance of his function carrying the last expired half hour forward to the forecastle, from the cabin time-piece, to have it struck at the ship’s large bell. “Master,” said the servant, discontinuing his work on the coat sleeve, and addressing the rapt Spaniard with a sort of timid apprehensiveness, as one charged with a duty, the discharge of which, it was foreseen, would prove irksome to the very person who had imposed it, and for whose benefit it was intended, “master told me never mind where he was, or how engaged, always to remind him to a minute, when shaving-time comes. Miguel has gone to strike the half-hour afternoon. It is now, master. Will master go into the cuddy?” “Ah–yes,” answered the Spaniard, starting, as from dreams into realities; then turning upon Captain Delano, he said that ere long he would resume the conversation. “Then if master means to talk more to Don Amasa,” said the servant, “why not let Don Amasa sit by master in the cuddy, and master can talk, and Don Amasa can listen, while Babo here lathers and strops.” “Yes,” said Captain Delano, not unpleased with this sociable plan, “yes, Don Benito, unless you had rather not, I will go with you.” “Be it so, Señor.” As the three passed aft, the American could not but think it another strange instance of his host’s capriciousness, this being shaved with such uncommon punctuality in the middle of the day. But he deemed it more than likely that the servant’s anxious fidelity had something to do with the matter; inasmuch as the timely interruption served to rally his master from the mood which had evidently been coming upon him. The place called the cuddy was a light deck-cabin formed by the poop, a sort of attic to the large cabin below. Part of it had formerly been the quarters of the officers; but since their death all the partitioning had been thrown down, and the whole interior converted into one spacious and airy marine hall; for absence of fine furniture and picturesque disarray of odd appurtenances, somewhat answering to the wide, cluttered hall of some eccentric bachelor-squire in the country, who hangs his shooting-jacket and tobacco-pouch on deer antlers, and keeps his fishing-rod, tongs, and walking-stick in the same corner. The similitude was heightened, if not originally suggested, by glimpses of the surrounding sea; since, in one aspect, the country and the ocean seem cousins-german. The floor of the cuddy was matted. Overhead, four or five old muskets were stuck into horizontal holes along the beams. On one side was a claw-footed old table lashed to the deck; a thumbed missal on it, and over it a small, meagre crucifix attached to the bulk-head. Under the table lay a dented cutlass or two, with a hacked harpoon, among some melancholy old rigging, like a heap of poor friars’ girdles. There were also two long, sharp-ribbed settees of Malacca cane, black with age, and uncomfortable to look at as inquisitors’ racks, with a large, misshapen arm-chair, which, furnished with a rude barber’s crotch at the back, working with a screw, seemed some grotesque engine of torment. A flag locker was in one corner, open, exposing various colored bunting, some rolled up, others half unrolled, still others tumbled. Opposite was a cumbrous washstand, of black mahogany, all of one block, with a pedestal, like a font, and over it a railed shelf, containing combs, brushes, and other implements of the toilet. A torn hammock of stained grass swung near; the sheets tossed, and the pillow wrinkled up like a brow, as if who ever slept here slept but illy, with alternate visitations of sad thoughts and bad dreams. The further extremity of the cuddy, overhanging the ship’s stern, was pierced with three openings, windows or port-holes, according as men or cannon might peer, socially or unsocially, out of them. At present neither men nor cannon were seen, though huge ring-bolts and other rusty iron fixtures of the wood-work hinted of twenty-four-pounders. Glancing towards the hammock as he entered, Captain Delano said, “You sleep here, Don Benito?” “Yes, Señor, since we got into mild weather.” “This seems a sort of dormitory, sitting-room, sail-loft, chapel, armory, and private closet all together, Don Benito,” added Captain Delano, looking round. “Yes, Señor; events have not been favorable to much order in my arrangements.” Here the servant, napkin on arm, made a motion as if waiting his master’s good pleasure. Don Benito signified his readiness, when, seating him in the Malacca arm-chair, and for the guest’s convenience drawing opposite one of the settees, the servant commenced operations by throwing back his master’s collar and loosening his cravat. There is something in the negro which, in a peculiar way, fits him for avocations about one’s person. Most negroes are natural valets and hair-dressers; taking to the comb and brush congenially as to the castinets, and flourishing them apparently with almost equal satisfaction. There is, too, a smooth tact about them in this employment, with a marvelous, noiseless, gliding briskness, not ungraceful in its way, singularly pleasing to behold, and still more so to be the manipulated subject of. And above all is the great gift of good-humor. Not the mere grin or laugh is here meant. Those were unsuitable. But a certain easy cheerfulness, harmonious in every glance and gesture; as though God had set the whole negro to some pleasant tune. When to this is added the docility arising from the unaspiring contentment of a limited mind and that susceptibility of blind attachment sometimes inhering in indisputable inferiors, one readily perceives why those hypochondriacs, Johnson and Byron–it may be, something like the hypochondriac Benito Cereno–took to their hearts, almost to the exclusion of the entire white race, their serving men, the negroes, Barber and Fletcher. But if there be that in the negro which exempts him from the inflicted sourness of the morbid or cynical mind, how, in his most prepossessing aspects, must he appear to a benevolent one? When at ease with respect to exterior things, Captain Delano’s nature was not only benign, but familiarly and humorously so. At home, he had often taken rare satisfaction in sitting in his door, watching some free man of color at his work or play. If on a voyage he chanced to have a black sailor, invariably he was on chatty and half-gamesome terms with him. In fact, like most men of a good, blithe heart, Captain Delano took to negroes, not philanthropically, but genially, just as other men to Newfoundland dogs. Hitherto, the circumstances in which he found the San Dominick had repressed the tendency. But in the cuddy, relieved from his former uneasiness, and, for various reasons, more sociably inclined than at any previous period of the day, and seeing the colored servant, napkin on arm, so debonair about his master, in a business so familiar as that of shaving, too, all his old weakness for negroes returned. Among other things, he was amused with an odd instance of the African love of bright colors and fine shows, in the black’s informally taking from the flag-locker a great piece of bunting of all hues, and lavishly tucking it under his master’s chin for an apron. The mode of shaving among the Spaniards is a little different from what it is with other nations. They have a basin, specifically called a barber’s basin, which on one side is scooped out, so as accurately to receive the chin, against which it is closely held in lathering; which is done, not with a brush, but with soap dipped in the water of the basin and rubbed on the face. In the present instance salt-water was used for lack of better; and the parts lathered were only the upper lip, and low down under the throat, all the rest being cultivated beard. The preliminaries being somewhat novel to Captain Delano, he sat curiously eying them, so that no conversation took place, nor, for the present, did Don Benito appear disposed to renew any. Setting down his basin, the negro searched among the razors, as for the sharpest, and having found it, gave it an additional edge by expertly strapping it on the firm, smooth, oily skin of his open palm; he then made a gesture as if to begin, but midway stood suspended for an instant, one hand elevating the razor, the other professionally dabbling among the bubbling suds on the Spaniard’s lank neck. Not unaffected by the close sight of the gleaming steel, Don Benito nervously shuddered; his usual ghastliness was heightened by the lather, which lather, again, was intensified in its hue by the contrasting sootiness of the negro’s body. Altogether the scene was somewhat peculiar, at least to Captain Delano, nor, as he saw the two thus postured, could he resist the vagary, that in the black he saw a headsman, and in the white a man at the block. But this was one of those antic conceits, appearing and vanishing in a breath, from which, perhaps, the best regulated mind is not always free. Meantime the agitation of the Spaniard had a little loosened the bunting from around him, so that one broad fold swept curtain-like over the chair-arm to the floor, revealing, amid a profusion of armorial bars and ground-colors–black, blue, and yellow–a closed castle in a blood red field diagonal with a lion rampant in a white. “The castle and the lion,” exclaimed Captain Delano–“why, Don Benito, this is the flag of Spain you use here. It’s well it’s only I, and not the King, that sees this,” he added, with a smile, “but”–turning towards the black–“it’s all one, I suppose, so the colors be gay;” which playful remark did not fail somewhat to tickle the negro. “Now, master,” he said, readjusting the flag, and pressing the head gently further back into the crotch of the chair; “now, master,” and the steel glanced nigh the throat. Again Don Benito faintly shuddered. “You must not shake so, master. See, Don Amasa, master always shakes when I shave him. And yet master knows I never yet have drawn blood, though it’s true, if master will shake so, I may some of these times. Now master,” he continued. “And now, Don Amasa, please go on with your talk about the gale, and all that; master can hear, and, between times, master can answer.” “Ah yes, these gales,” said Captain Delano; “but the more I think of your voyage, Don Benito, the more I wonder, not at the gales, terrible as they must have been, but at the disastrous interval following them. For here, by your account, have you been these two months and more getting from Cape Horn to St. Maria, a distance which I myself, with a good wind, have sailed in a few days. True, you had calms, and long ones, but to be becalmed for two months, that is, at least, unusual. Why, Don Benito, had almost any other gentleman told me such a story, I should have been half disposed to a little incredulity.” Here an involuntary expression came over the Spaniard, similar to that just before on the deck, and whether it was the start he gave, or a sudden gawky roll of the hull in the calm, or a momentary unsteadiness of the servant’s hand, however it was, just then the razor drew blood, spots of which stained the creamy lather under the throat: immediately the black barber drew back his steel, and, remaining in his professional attitude, back to Captain Delano, and face to Don Benito, held up the trickling razor, saying, with a sort of half humorous sorrow, “See, master–you shook so–here’s Babo’s first blood.” No sword drawn before James the First of England, no assassination in that timid King’s presence, could have produced a more terrified aspect than was now presented by Don Benito. Poor fellow, thought Captain Delano, so nervous he can’t even bear the sight of barber’s blood; and this unstrung, sick man, is it credible that I should have imagined he meant to spill all my blood, who can’t endure the sight of one little drop of his own? Surely, Amasa Delano, you have been beside yourself this day. Tell it not when you get home, sappy Amasa. Well, well, he looks like a murderer, doesn’t he? More like as if himself were to be done for. Well, well, this day’s experience shall be a good lesson. Meantime, while these things were running through the honest seaman’s mind, the servant had taken the napkin from his arm, and to Don Benito had said–“But answer Don Amasa, please, master, while I wipe this ugly stuff off the razor, and strop it again.” As he said the words, his face was turned half round, so as to be alike visible to the Spaniard and the American, and seemed, by its expression, to hint, that he was desirous, by getting his master to go on with the conversation, considerately to withdraw his attention from the recent annoying accident. As if glad to snatch the offered relief, Don Benito resumed, rehearsing to Captain Delano, that not only were the calms of unusual duration, but the ship had fallen in with obstinate currents; and other things he added, some of which were but repetitions of former statements, to explain how it came to pass that the passage from Cape Horn to St. Maria had been so exceedingly long; now and then, mingling with his words, incidental praises, less qualified than before, to the blacks, for their general good conduct. These particulars were not given consecutively, the servant, at convenient times, using his razor, and so, between the intervals of shaving, the story and panegyric went on with more than usual huskiness. To Captain Delano’s imagination, now again not wholly at rest, there was something so hollow in the Spaniard’s manner, with apparently some reciprocal hollowness in the servant’s dusky comment of silence, that the idea flashed across him, that possibly master and man, for some unknown purpose, were acting out, both in word and deed, nay, to the very tremor of Don Benito’s limbs, some juggling play before him. Neither did the suspicion of collusion lack apparent support, from the fact of those whispered conferences before mentioned. But then, what could be the object of enacting this play of the barber before him? At last, regarding the notion as a whimsy, insensibly suggested, perhaps, by the theatrical aspect of Don Benito in his harlequin ensign, Captain Delano speedily banished it. The shaving over, the servant bestirred himself with a small bottle of scented waters, pouring a few drops on the head, and then diligently rubbing; the vehemence of the exercise causing the muscles of his face to twitch rather strangely. His next operation was with comb, scissors, and brush; going round and round, smoothing a curl here, clipping an unruly whisker-hair there, giving a graceful sweep to the temple-lock, with other impromptu touches evincing the hand of a master; while, like any resigned gentleman in barber’s hands, Don Benito bore all, much less uneasily, at least than he had done the razoring; indeed, he sat so pale and rigid now, that the negro seemed a Nubian sculptor finishing off a white statue-head. All being over at last, the standard of Spain removed, tumbled up, and tossed back into the flag-locker, the negro’s warm breath blowing away any stray hair, which might have lodged down his master’s neck; collar and cravat readjusted; a speck of lint whisked off the velvet lapel; all this being done; backing off a little space, and pausing with an expression of subdued self-complacency, the servant for a moment surveyed his master, as, in toilet at least, the creature of his own tasteful hands. Captain Delano playfully complimented him upon his achievement; at the same time congratulating Don Benito. But neither sweet waters, nor shampooing, nor fidelity, nor sociality, delighted the Spaniard. Seeing him relapsing into forbidding gloom, and still remaining seated, Captain Delano, thinking that his presence was undesired just then, withdrew, on pretense of seeing whether, as he had prophesied, any signs of a breeze were visible. Walking forward to the main-mast, he stood awhile thinking over the scene, and not without some undefined misgivings, when he heard a noise near the cuddy, and turning, saw the negro, his hand to his cheek. Advancing, Captain Delano perceived that the cheek was bleeding. He was about to ask the cause, when the negro’s wailing soliloquy enlightened him. “Ah, when will master get better from his sickness; only the sour heart that sour sickness breeds made him serve Babo so; cutting Babo with the razor, because, only by accident, Babo had given master one little scratch; and for the first time in so many a day, too. Ah, ah, ah,” holding his hand to his face. Is it possible, thought Captain Delano; was it to wreak in private his Spanish spite against this poor friend of his, that Don Benito, by his sullen manner, impelled me to withdraw? Ah this slavery breeds ugly passions in man.–Poor fellow! He was about to speak in sympathy to the negro, but with a timid reluctance he now re-entered the cuddy. Presently master and man came forth; Don Benito leaning on his servant as if nothing had happened. But a sort of love-quarrel, after all, thought Captain Delano. He accosted Don Benito, and they slowly walked together. They had gone but a few paces, when the steward–a tall, rajah-looking mulatto, orientally set off with a pagoda turban formed by three or four Madras handkerchiefs wound about his head, tier on tier–approaching with a saalam, announced lunch in the cabin. On their way thither, the two captains were preceded by the mulatto, who, turning round as he advanced, with continual smiles and bows, ushered them on, a display of elegance which quite completed the insignificance of the small bare-headed Babo, who, as if not unconscious of inferiority, eyed askance the graceful steward. But in part, Captain Delano imputed his jealous watchfulness to that peculiar feeling which the full-blooded African entertains for the adulterated one. As for the steward, his manner, if not bespeaking much dignity of self-respect, yet evidenced his extreme desire to please; which is doubly meritorious, as at once Christian and Chesterfieldian. Captain Delano observed with interest that while the complexion of the mulatto was hybrid, his physiognomy was European–classically so. “Don Benito,” whispered he, “I am glad to see this usher-of-the-golden-rod of yours; the sight refutes an ugly remark once made to me by a Barbadoes planter; that when a mulatto has a regular European face, look out for him; he is a devil. But see, your steward here has features more regular than King George’s of England; and yet there he nods, and bows, and smiles; a king, indeed–the king of kind hearts and polite fellows. What a pleasant voice he has, too?” “He has, Señor.” “But tell me, has he not, so far as you have known him, always proved a good, worthy fellow?” said Captain Delano, pausing, while with a final genuflexion the steward disappeared into the cabin; “come, for the reason just mentioned, I am curious to know.” “Francesco is a good man,” a sort of sluggishly responded Don Benito, like a phlegmatic appreciator, who would neither find fault nor flatter. “Ah, I thought so. For it were strange, indeed, and not very creditable to us white-skins, if a little of our blood mixed with the African’s, should, far from improving the latter’s quality, have the sad effect of pouring vitriolic acid into black broth; improving the hue, perhaps, but not the wholesomeness.” “Doubtless, doubtless, Señor, but”–glancing at Babo–“not to speak of negroes, your planter’s remark I have heard applied to the Spanish and Indian intermixtures in our provinces. But I know nothing about the matter,” he listlessly added. And here they entered the cabin. The lunch was a frugal one. Some of Captain Delano’s fresh fish and pumpkins, biscuit and salt beef, the reserved bottle of cider, and the San Dominick’s last bottle of Canary. As they entered, Francesco, with two or three colored aids, was hovering over the table giving the last adjustments. Upon perceiving their master they withdrew, Francesco making a smiling congé, and the Spaniard, without condescending to notice it, fastidiously remarking to his companion that he relished not superfluous attendance. Without companions, host and guest sat down, like a childless married couple, at opposite ends of the table, Don Benito waving Captain Delano to his place, and, weak as he was, insisting upon that gentleman being seated before himself. The negro placed a rug under Don Benito’s feet, and a cushion behind his back, and then stood behind, not his master’s chair, but Captain Delano’s. At first, this a little surprised the latter. But it was soon evident that, in taking his position, the black was still true to his master; since by facing him he could the more readily anticipate his slightest want. “This is an uncommonly intelligent fellow of yours, Don Benito,” whispered Captain Delano across the table. “You say true, Señor.” During the repast, the guest again reverted to parts of Don Benito’s story, begging further particulars here and there. He inquired how it was that the scurvy and fever should have committed such wholesale havoc upon the whites, while destroying less than half of the blacks. As if this question reproduced the whole scene of plague before the Spaniard’s eyes, miserably reminding him of his solitude in a cabin where before he had had so many friends and officers round him, his hand shook, his face became hueless, broken words escaped; but directly the sane memory of the past seemed replaced by insane terrors of the present. With starting eyes he stared before him at vacancy. For nothing was to be seen but the hand of his servant pushing the Canary over towards him. At length a few sips served partially to restore him. He made random reference to the different constitution of races, enabling one to offer more resistance to certain maladies than another. The thought was new to his companion. Presently Captain Delano, intending to say something to his host concerning the pecuniary part of the business he had undertaken for him, especially–since he was strictly accountable to his owners–with reference to the new suit of sails, and other things of that sort; and naturally preferring to conduct such affairs in private, was desirous that the servant should withdraw; imagining that Don Benito for a few minutes could dispense with his attendance. He, however, waited awhile; thinking that, as the conversation proceeded, Don Benito, without being prompted, would perceive the propriety of the step. But it was otherwise. At last catching his host’s eye, Captain Delano, with a slight backward gesture of his thumb, whispered, “Don Benito, pardon me, but there is an interference with the full expression of what I have to say to you.” Upon this the Spaniard changed countenance; which was imputed to his resenting the hint, as in some way a reflection upon his servant. After a moment’s pause, he assured his guest that the black’s remaining with them could be of no disservice; because since losing his officers he had made Babo (whose original office, it now appeared, had been captain of the slaves) not only his constant attendant and companion, but in all things his confidant. After this, nothing more could be said; though, indeed, Captain Delano could hardly avoid some little tinge of irritation upon being left ungratified in so inconsiderable a wish, by one, too, for whom he intended such solid services. But it is only his querulousness, thought he; and so filling his glass he proceeded to business. The price of the sails and other matters was fixed upon. But while this was being done, the American observed that, though his original offer of assistance had been hailed with hectic animation, yet now when it was reduced to a business transaction, indifference and apathy were betrayed. Don Benito, in fact, appeared to submit to hearing the details more out of regard to common propriety, than from any impression that weighty benefit to himself and his voyage was involved. Soon, his manner became still more reserved. The effort was vain to seek to draw him into social talk. Gnawed by his splenetic mood, he sat twitching his beard, while to little purpose the hand of his servant, mute as that on the wall, slowly pushed over the Canary. Lunch being over, they sat down on the cushioned transom; the servant placing a pillow behind his master. The long continuance of the calm had now affected the atmosphere. Don Benito sighed heavily, as if for breath. “Why not adjourn to the cuddy,” said Captain Delano; “there is more air there.” But the host sat silent and motionless. Meantime his servant knelt before him, with a large fan of feathers. And Francesco coming in on tiptoes, handed the negro a little cup of aromatic waters, with which at intervals he chafed his master’s brow; smoothing the hair along the temples as a nurse does a child’s. He spoke no word. He only rested his eye on his master’s, as if, amid all Don Benito’s distress, a little to refresh his spirit by the silent sight of fidelity. Presently the ship’s bell sounded two o’clock; and through the cabin windows a slight rippling of the sea was discerned; and from the desired direction. “There,” exclaimed Captain Delano, “I told you so, Don Benito, look!” He had risen to his feet, speaking in a very animated tone, with a view the more to rouse his companion. But though the crimson curtain of the stern-window near him that moment fluttered against his pale cheek, Don Benito seemed to have even less welcome for the breeze than the calm. Poor fellow, thought Captain Delano, bitter experience has taught him that one ripple does not make a wind, any more than one swallow a summer. But he is mistaken for once. I will get his ship in for him, and prove it. Briefly alluding to his weak condition, he urged his host to remain quietly where he was, since he (Captain Delano) would with pleasure take upon himself the responsibility of making the best use of the wind. Upon gaining the deck, Captain Delano started at the unexpected figure of Atufal, monumentally fixed at the threshold, like one of those sculptured porters of black marble guarding the porches of Egyptian tombs. But this time the start was, perhaps, purely physical. Atufal’s presence, singularly attesting docility even in sullenness, was contrasted with that of the hatchet-polishers, who in patience evinced their industry; while both spectacles showed, that lax as Don Benito’s general authority might be, still, whenever he chose to exert it, no man so savage or colossal but must, more or less, bow. Snatching a trumpet which hung from the bulwarks, with a free step Captain Delano advanced to the forward edge of the poop, issuing his orders in his best Spanish. The few sailors and many negroes, all equally pleased, obediently set about heading the ship towards the harbor. While giving some directions about setting a lower stu’n’-sail, suddenly Captain Delano heard a voice faithfully repeating his orders. Turning, he saw Babo, now for the time acting, under the pilot, his original part of captain of the slaves. This assistance proved valuable. Tattered sails and warped yards were soon brought into some trim. And no brace or halyard was pulled but to the blithe songs of the inspirited negroes. Good fellows, thought Captain Delano, a little training would make fine sailors of them. Why see, the very women pull and sing too. These must be some of those Ashantee negresses that make such capital soldiers, I’ve heard. But who’s at the helm. I must have a good hand there. He went to see. The San Dominick steered with a cumbrous tiller, with large horizontal pullies attached. At each pully-end stood a subordinate black, and between them, at the tiller-head, the responsible post, a Spanish seaman, whose countenance evinced his due share in the general hopefulness and confidence at the coming of the breeze. He proved the same man who had behaved with so shame-faced an air on the windlass. “Ah,–it is you, my man,” exclaimed Captain Delano–“well, no more sheep’s-eyes now;–look straight forward and keep the ship so. Good hand, I trust? And want to get into the harbor, don’t you?” The man assented with an inward chuckle, grasping the tiller-head firmly. Upon this, unperceived by the American, the two blacks eyed the sailor intently. Finding all right at the helm, the pilot went forward to the forecastle, to see how matters stood there. The ship now had way enough to breast the current. With the approach of evening, the breeze would be sure to freshen. Having done all that was needed for the present, Captain Delano, giving his last orders to the sailors, turned aft to report affairs to Don Benito in the cabin; perhaps additionally incited to rejoin him by the hope of snatching a moment’s private chat while the servant was engaged upon deck. From opposite sides, there were, beneath the poop, two approaches to the cabin; one further forward than the other, and consequently communicating with a longer passage. Marking the servant still above, Captain Delano, taking the nighest entrance–the one last named, and at whose porch Atufal still stood–hurried on his way, till, arrived at the cabin threshold, he paused an instant, a little to recover from his eagerness. Then, with the words of his intended business upon his lips, he entered. As he advanced toward the seated Spaniard, he heard another footstep, keeping time with his. From the opposite door, a salver in hand, the servant was likewise advancing. “Confound the faithful fellow,” thought Captain Delano; “what a vexatious coincidence.” Possibly, the vexation might have been something different, were it not for the brisk confidence inspired by the breeze. But even as it was, he felt a slight twinge, from a sudden indefinite association in his mind of Babo with Atufal. “Don Benito,” said he, “I give you joy; the breeze will hold, and will increase. By the way, your tall man and time-piece, Atufal, stands without. By your order, of course?” Don Benito recoiled, as if at some bland satirical touch, delivered with such adroit garnish of apparent good breeding as to present no handle for retort. He is like one flayed alive, thought Captain Delano; where may one touch him without causing a shrink? The servant moved before his master, adjusting a cushion; recalled to civility, the Spaniard stiffly replied: “you are right. The slave appears where you saw him, according to my command; which is, that if at the given hour I am below, he must take his stand and abide my coming.” “Ah now, pardon me, but that is treating the poor fellow like an ex-king indeed. Ah, Don Benito,” smiling, “for all the license you permit in some things, I fear lest, at bottom, you are a bitter hard master.” Again Don Benito shrank; and this time, as the good sailor thought, from a genuine twinge of his conscience. Again conversation became constrained. In vain Captain Delano called attention to the now perceptible motion of the keel gently cleaving the sea; with lack-lustre eye, Don Benito returned words few and reserved. By-and-by, the wind having steadily risen, and still blowing right into the harbor bore the San Dominick swiftly on. Sounding a point of land, the sealer at distance came into open view. Meantime Captain Delano had again repaired to the deck, remaining there some time. Having at last altered the ship’s course, so as to give the reef a wide berth, he returned for a few moments below. I will cheer up my poor friend, this time, thought he. “Better and better,” Don Benito, he cried as he blithely re-entered: “there will soon be an end to your cares, at least for awhile. For when, after a long, sad voyage, you know, the anchor drops into the haven, all its vast weight seems lifted from the captain’s heart. We are getting on famously, Don Benito. My ship is in sight. Look through this side-light here; there she is; all a-taunt-o! The Bachelor’s Delight, my good friend. Ah, how this wind braces one up. Come, you must take a cup of coffee with me this evening. My old steward will give you as fine a cup as ever any sultan tasted. What say you, Don Benito, will you?” At first, the Spaniard glanced feverishly up, casting a longing look towards the sealer, while with mute concern his servant gazed into his face. Suddenly the old ague of coldness returned, and dropping back to his cushions he was silent. “You do not answer. Come, all day you have been my host; would you have hospitality all on one side?” “I cannot go,” was the response. “What? it will not fatigue you. The ships will lie together as near as they can, without swinging foul. It will be little more than stepping from deck to deck; which is but as from room to room. Come, come, you must not refuse me.” “I cannot go,” decisively and repulsively repeated Don Benito. Renouncing all but the last appearance of courtesy, with a sort of cadaverous sullenness, and biting his thin nails to the quick, he glanced, almost glared, at his guest, as if impatient that a stranger’s presence should interfere with the full indulgence of his morbid hour. Meantime the sound of the parted waters came more and more gurglingly and merrily in at the windows; as reproaching him for his dark spleen; as telling him that, sulk as he might, and go mad with it, nature cared not a jot; since, whose fault was it, pray? But the foul mood was now at its depth, as the fair wind at its height. There was something in the man so far beyond any mere unsociality or sourness previously evinced, that even the forbearing good-nature of his guest could no longer endure it. Wholly at a loss to account for such demeanor, and deeming sickness with eccentricity, however extreme, no adequate excuse, well satisfied, too, that nothing in his own conduct could justify it, Captain Delano’s pride began to be roused. Himself became reserved. But all seemed one to the Spaniard. Quitting him, therefore, Captain Delano once more went to the deck. The ship was now within less than two miles of the sealer. The whale-boat was seen darting over the interval. To be brief, the two vessels, thanks to the pilot’s skill, ere long neighborly style lay anchored together.

      Mapping Melville: An Exploration of the Literature Responding to Benito Cereno Using Story Maps

    1. [14] I have already computed the Charge of nursing a Beggars Child (in which list I reckon all Cottagers, Labourers, and four fifths of the Farmers) to be about two Shillings per Annum, Rags included; and I believe no Gentleman would repine to give Ten Shillings for the Carcass of a good fat Child, which, as I have said will make four Dishes of excellent Nutritive Meat, when he hath only some particular friend, or his own Family to Dine with him. Thus the Squire will learn to be a good Landlord, and grow popular among his Tenants, the Mother will have Eight Shillings neat profit, and be fit for Work till she produceth another Child. [15] Those who are more thrifty (as I must confess the Times require) may flay the Carcass; the Skin of which, Artificially 17  dressed, will make admirable Gloves for Ladies, and Summer Boots for fine Gentlemen. [16] As to our City of Dublin, Shambles 18  may be appointed for this purpose, in the most convenient parts of it, and Butchers we may be assured will not be wanting, although I rather recommend buying the Children alive, and dressing them hot from the Knife, as we do roasting Pigs. [17] A very worthy Person, a true Lover of his Country, and whose Virtues I highly esteem, was lately pleased, in discoursing on this matter, to offer a refinement upon my Scheme. He said, that many Gentlemen of this Kingdom, having of late destroyed their Deer, he conceived that the want of Venison might be well supplyed by the Bodies of young Lads and Maidens, not exceeding fourteen Years of Age, nor under twelve; so great a Number of both Sexes in every County being now ready to Starve, for want of Work and Service: And these to be disposed of by their Parents if alive, or otherwise by their nearest Relations. But with due deference to so excellent a friend, and so deserving a Patriot, I cannot be altogether in his Sentiments, for as to the Males, my American acquaintance assured me from frequent Experience, that their flesh was generally Tough and Lean, like that of our School-boys, by continual exercise, and their Taste disagreeable, and to Fatten them would not answer the Charge. Then as to the Females, it would, I think, with humble Submission, be a loss to the Publick, because they soon would become Breeders themselves: And besides it is not improbable that some scrupulous People might be apt to Censure such a Practice, (although indeed very unjustly) as a little bordering upon Cruelty, which, I confess, hath always been with me the strongest objection against any Project, how well soever intended. [18] But in order to justify my friend, he confessed, that this expedient was put into his head by the famous Sallmanaazor, 19  a Native of the Island Formosa, who came from thence to London, above twenty Years ago, and in Conversation told my friend, that in his Country when any young Person happened to be put to Death, the Executioner sold the Carcass to Persons of Quality, as a prime Dainty, and that, in his Time, the Body of a plump Girl of fifteen, who was crucifyed for an attempt to Poison the Emperor, was sold to his Imperial Majesty's prime Minister of State, and other great Mandarins 20  of the Court, in Joints from the Gibbet, 21  at four hundred Crowns. Neither indeed can I deny, that if the same use were made of several plump young Girls in this Town, who, without one single Groat 22  to their Fortunes, cannot stir abroad without a Chair, 23  and appear at a Play-House, and Assemblies in Foreign fineries, which they never will Pay for; the Kingdom would not be the worse.

      His plan is to eat the kids, make more kids and then eat those kids. He talks about how people find children tasty.

    1. But Trump's gamble may not be universally successful. His clamorous approach could backfire in the more moderate suburban districts where the battle for the House will be decided and he ran behind Hillary Clinton in 2016.Read Moreclose dialog Receive Fareed Zakaria's Global Analysis including insights and must-reads of world newsPlease enter aboveActivate Fareed's BriefingBy subscribing you agree to ourprivacy policy. Thanks For SubscribingPlease check your inbox to confirm your signupContinue Readingclose dialog/* effects for .bx-campaign-655004 *//* rendered styles .bx-campaign-655004 */.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-1 .bx-creative> *:first-child {width: 780px;padding: 38px 40px 30px 40px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-1 .bx-creative> *:first-child {width: 400px;padding: 20px;}}@media all and (min-width: 737px) and (max-width: 1024px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-1 .bx-creative> *:first-child {width: 737px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-1 .bx-creative:before {min-height: 285px;}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-1 .bx-creative {background-color: #1a1a1a;border-style: none;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-1 .bx-creative:before {min-height: 170px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-1 .bx-close {width: 20px;stroke: rgb(169, 169, 169);}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-WRqyYJF {width: 100%;padding: 0px;text-align: left;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-WRqyYJF {width: 90%;padding: 0px;text-align: center;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-UC84ER9 {width: 80px;text-align: left;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-UC84ER9 {text-align: center;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-UC84ER9> *:first-child {position: absolute;left: 30;top: 20px;width: 80px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-UC84ER9> *:first-child {position: relative;left: 0;top: -10px;width: 80px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-Oo3RSns {width: 100%;padding: 20px 0 20px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-Oo3RSns {padding: 0 0 15px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-Oo3RSns> *:first-child {font-size: 36px;font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;color: white;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-Oo3RSns> *:first-child {font-size: 25px;}}@media all and (min-width: 737px) and (max-width: 1024px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-Oo3RSns> *:first-child {font-size: 30px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-c4p3nuh {padding: 0px 0px 20px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-c4p3nuh {width: auto;padding: 0px 0px 10px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-c4p3nuh> *:first-child {font-size: 17px;font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;color: white;letter-spacing: 0.01em;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-c4p3nuh> *:first-child {font-size: 13px;padding: 0px 20px ;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-q9bLmdQ {width: 100%;padding: 0px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-q9bLmdQ {width: 300px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-sqLogHZ .bx-el {padding: 15px;font-size: 12px;font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;border-style: solid;border-color: rgb(220, 220, 220);}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-sqLogHZ .bx-el {font-size: 12px;padding: 12px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-sqLogHZ {width: 60%;padding: 0px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-sqLogHZ {width: 100%;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-WyGkyzr {width: 40%;padding: 0px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-WyGkyzr {width: 100%;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-WyGkyzr> *:first-child {padding: 15px;font-size: 14px;font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;border-style: solid;border-color: #262626;border-width: 1px;background-color: #cc0300;line-height: 14px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-WyGkyzr> *:first-child {font-size: 14px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-YABdd0k {text-align: left;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-YABdd0k {text-align: center;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-NFMXMIR {width: auto;padding: 10px 5px 0px 0px;}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-NFMXMIR> *:first-child {font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;font-size: 12px;color: white;}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-hHC74e5 {width: auto;padding: 10px 5px 0px 0px;}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-hHC74e5> *:first-child {font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;font-size: 12px;color: white;text-decoration: underline;}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-2 .bx-creative> *:first-child {width: 780px;padding: 38px 40px 30px 40px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-2 .bx-creative> *:first-child {width: 400px;padding: 20px;}}@media all and (min-width: 737px) and (max-width: 1024px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-2 .bx-creative> *:first-child {width: 737px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-2 .bx-creative:before {min-height: 285px;}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-2 .bx-creative {background-color: #1a1a1a;border-style: none;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-2 .bx-creative:before {min-height: 170px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004.bx-active-step-2 .bx-close {width: 20px;stroke: rgb(169, 169, 169);}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-WgXDCRA {width: 100%;padding: 0px;text-align: left;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-WgXDCRA {width: 100%;padding: 0px;text-align: center;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-3LTIrsx {width: 80px;text-align: left;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-3LTIrsx {text-align: center;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-3LTIrsx> *:first-child {position: absolute;left: 30;top: 20px;width: 80px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-3LTIrsx> *:first-child {position: relative;left: 0;top: -10px;width: 80px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-MBEqoef {width: 100%;padding: 0 0 20px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-MBEqoef {padding: 0 0 15px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-MBEqoef> *:first-child {font-size: 36px;font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;color: white;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-MBEqoef> *:first-child {font-size: 25px;}}@media all and (min-width: 737px) and (max-width: 1024px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-MBEqoef> *:first-child {font-size: 30px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-fBHaAez {padding: 0px 0px 20px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-fBHaAez {width: auto;padding: 0px 0px 10px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-fBHaAez> *:first-child {font-size: 17px;font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;color: white;letter-spacing: 0.01em;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-fBHaAez> *:first-child {font-size: 14px;padding: 0px 20px ;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-XevO9fF {width: 100%;padding: 0px;text-align: left;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-group-655004-XevO9fF {width: 300px;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-krkhHod {width: 30%;padding: 0px;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-krkhHod {width: 100%;}}.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-krkhHod> *:first-child {padding: 15px;font-size: 14px;font-family: CNN,Helvetica Neue,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;font-weight: 400;border-style: solid;border-color: #262626;border-width: 1px;background-color: #cc0300;}@media all and (max-width: 736px) {.bxc.bx-campaign-655004 .bx-element-655004-krkhHod> *:first-child {font-size: 14px;}}#bx-campaign-655004 #bx-close-inside-655004 { z-index: 1; }And his strategy -- which is essentially a case of a President grabbing some of the most emotive, divisive political issues and demagoguing them in a fear-based campaign for his own benefit -- is likely to leave the nation more polarized and unable to reach solutions to its most pressing problems.READ: Trump's making the migrant caravan a political issue. Here are the facts.The President's midterm onslaught is playing out in rallies across the nation that mostly target conservative regions where he is most popular.His latest stop was Texas, where he appeared alongside former GOP presidential primary rival Sen. Ted Cruz on Monday night."The Democrats have launched an assault on the sovereignty of our country, the security of our nation and the safety of every American," Trump said, blaming Democrats for "the crisis on our border."His hardcore approach sometimes overshadows the story of success that the President has to tell and would be the top talking point for most presidents, including the lowest jobless rate in half a century, an economy that has thrived since he has been in office and the two conservative Supreme Court justices he has installed.In his most extreme attack, Trump is accusing Democrats of organizing a migrant caravan trekking through Mexico that he says will lay siege to the US border. He has claimed without offering any evidence that the caravan includes criminals and "unknown Middle Easterners." Reporters walking with the caravan say it's made up of desperate Hondurans and Guatemalans fleeing repression and poverty.White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said that there was "absolutely" evidence of Middle Easterners in the caravan -- but did not provide any.Trump also argues that Democrats want to create a socialist system of "gridlock, poverty and chaos" like Venezuela. That's a big leap since the Nicolas Maduro regime and its predecessor destroyed the economy and triggered mass economic migration and the worst humanitarian crisis in the Western hemisphere.Trump has also warned of voter fraud, which doesn't exist at significant levels, and claims the Democratic Party has been taken over by proponents of "unhinged" mob rule -- even though his rallies are the ones where supporters yell for his political opponents to be locked up, and he praised a lawmaker for assaulting a reporter. He said most Democrats opposed his opioid initiative, even though it passed 98-1 in the Senate and 393-8 in the House. On Monday, in an exchange with reporters, he could not support his earlier claim that there were riots in California over so-called sanctuary cities.Vehemence of rhetoricTrump is certainly not the first politician to distort the profiles and positions of his opponents or to suggest that their positions are un-American.President George W. Bush, for instance, warned during the 2006 midterm campaign that with Democrats "the terrorists win and America loses." And rough campaigning has been a feature of elections involving Thomas Jefferson and John Adams to Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.But the volume and vehemence of Trump's rhetoric, and his willingness to fling explosive claims even though they are demonstrably untrue is unlike any campaign in decades.In Arizona, over the weekend for instance, a huge chunk of his speech was on immigration. Trump voters, many of whom believe politicians failed to do anything about what they see as undocumented migrants undercutting their wages and taking their jobs, see the President's rhetoric as legitimate. And they reject media critiques that the President lies and many see his unchained rhetoric as exactly the kind of anti-establishment behavior that made him an attractive candidate in the first place.The television footage of people marching across Mexico plays directly into Trump's rhetorical law-and-order construct of a nation under siege from outside criminal elements -- no matter what the reality on the ground may be. Trump's claims are also relayed by conservative media."A Democratic victory in November would be a bright flashing invitation to every trafficker, smuggler, drug dealer and illegal alien on the planet. Come on in, folks," Trump said in Arizona."A Republican victory would send the message that America will enforce our borders and defend our citizens. It's important."Trump's tough approach has highlighted one of his most useful political assets that also makes him the most dangerous threat to the conventions of the political system in decades -- his lack of shame and willingness to make brazen arguments based on lies, which most presidents would avoid.His energy and willingness to campaign like he is on the ballot may also be a factor."We've added a lot of spice to it, when I say we, maybe it's I, and others perhaps. They see that I am coming here," Trump said, in an interview with ABC 13 News in Houston.How do Democrats respond?Trump's spiced up rhetoric has left Democrats facing questions about how to respond since they have no one on the national political stage with the star power of the President. Former Vice President Joe Biden on Monday accused Trump of scaremongering over the border and a caravan that is still 1,000 miles away."He's making it sound like they're breaking through the border. This is hysteria on his part," Biden, a potential 2020 Democratic candidate, told CNN while campaigning in Florida.On Saturday, the top two Democrats in Congress, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, argued that Trump's harsh turn was a sign of weakness rather than strength."The president is desperate to change the subject from health care to immigration because he knows that health care is the number one issue Americans care about," they said in a joint statement.In some ways, Trump does not have many options but to go on such a rampage. He's built his presidency on keeping his base angry -- and in the process has alienated many more moderate voters. So only a presidential-election-level turnout from his base in a midterm election is likely to stave off big Democratic gains at a time when the opposition party is also enthusiastic.And he knows that immigration -- from the moment he stepped on the escalator in Trump Tower in 2015 to be a candidate -- is the issue that has helped him at the ballot box more than any other, despite political missteps like the separation of undocumented immigrant families and their children earlier this year."I think Donald Trump is President because of the immigration issue," Scott Jennings, a former campaign aide to Bush, told CNN on Monday."He wants to paint a line between a party that wants border security and a party that doesn't."But former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook argued that the fragmented nature of the Senate and House races meant that Trump's immigration rhetoric represented a high-risk strategy."I don't think it is going to save them in these suburban areas that are so important for the House map or the gubernatorial map," Mook told CNN's Erica Hill.CNN's Arlette Saenz and Jeremy Diamond contributed to this story /* dynamic basic css */ .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;height:50%;width:100%;text-align:center;top:25%;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .AR_36 .ob_what a:after {content: "";vertical-align:super;;;background-image: url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/achoice.svg');background-size:75% 75%;width:12px;height:12px;padding-left:4px;display:inline-block;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-position:right center;border-left:1px solid #999;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_logo, .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo, .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo, .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_smartFeedLogo.min.svg') no-repeat center top;width:140px;height:21px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;background-size: 86px 23px;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{width:90px;height:20px;background-size:90px 20px;} } .AR_36.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .AR_36.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .AR_36.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .AR_36.ob-widget {position:relative;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_what{position:absolute;top:5px;right:0px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic smartfeed-strip css */ .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {position:relative;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-image-ratio {height:0px;line-height:0px;padding-top:60.0%;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-rec-image {width:100%;position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;opacity:0;transition:all 750ms;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-show {opacity:1;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;padding:0px 3px;background-color:#666;color:white;font-size:10px;line-height:15px;} .AR_36.ob-widget {width:auto;min-width:120px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;min-width:50px;width:48.85%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName, .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogoAndName {display:inline-block;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:bottom;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:super;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {direction: ltr;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin-left:0;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin:0 0 0 2.3%; } .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {direction:ltr; } .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-unit {display:block;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-text {max-height:60.0px;overflow:hidden;} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-source {} .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {box-shadow:0px 2px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .28);margin-bottom:20px;padding-bottom:4px;padding-top:0;background-color:white;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {margin-left:10px;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-text {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-description {margin: 5px 10px 2px 10px; font-size:16px;} .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN {padding:0; margin-top:20px;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {clear: both;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {background-color: #4a90e2; bottom:10px;right:0px;left:auto; font-family: helvetica;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 0%;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_what {padding-top: 0; margin-top:0px; top: 0;} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo {background-size: contain;border-radius: 50%;background-position: center;background-repeat: no-repeat} [data-idx="1"] .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container:not(:last-child) {box-shadow: none;margin-bottom: auto;} /* dynamic customized css */ .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:inherit;font-size:16px;color:black;padding-bottom:15px;padding-top:0px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {max-width:500px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text {font-family:inherit;color:black;margin:5px 0 0px;text-align:left;line-height:1.25;font-size:16px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text:hover {color:#c00;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container {margin:5px 0 0px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:4px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:14px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:inherit;margin:5px 0 0px;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;font-weight:400;} .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} /*****DARK TEMPLATE*****/ .t-dark .OUTBRAIN .AR_36 .ob-widget-header { background-color: #404040 !important; border-bottom: 1px solid #404040 !important; color: #fefefe !important; } .t-dark .OUTBRAIN .AR_36 .ob-rec-text, .t-dark .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1 .ob-rec-text, .t-dark .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2 .ob-rec-text, .t-dark .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3 .ob-rec-text, .t-dark .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4 .ob-rec-text { color: #fff !important; } .pg-politics .AR_36.ob-widget .ob_what a { color: #fff; } /*****DARK TEMPLATE*****/ .OUTBRAIN .AR_36.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget { width: 100%; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget { padding: 12px 0 24px; } .AR_36.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget { padding: 0 0 24px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget { border-bottom: solid 1px #e6e6e6; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header { display: block; width: 100%; color: #404040; height: 36px; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border-bottom: solid 1px #e6e6e6; margin-bottom: 24px; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-stretch: condensed; letter-spacing: 2px; padding-top: 7px; text-transform: uppercase; font-family: "CNN Condensed", CNN, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header:after { content: ''; display: BLOCK; width: 16px; height: 4px; background-color: #737373; position: relative; top: 6px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_3 .ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_2 .ob-rec-text { font-family: "CNN", Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.25; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: left; color: #262626; padding-bottom: 8px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_2 .ob-rec-text { padding-bottom: 0; } .OUTBRAIN .AR_36 .ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_1 .ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_4 .ob-rec-text { font-family: "CNN", Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 22px; font-style: normal; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.25; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: left; color: #262626; margin: 0; } .OUTBRAIN .AR_36 .ob-rec-text { padding-top: 8px; } .OUTBRAIN .AR_36 .ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_2 .ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_4 .ob-rec-text { font-weight: 500; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_1 .ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_3 .ob-rec-text { font-weight: bold; } .OUTBRAIN .AR_36 .ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_2 .ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_4 .ob-rec-source { font-family: "CNN", Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 500; font-style: normal; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.63; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: left; color: #737373; padding: 0; } .OUTBRAIN .AR_36 .ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_4 .ob-rec-source { padding-top: 4px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_1 .ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN .SFD_STP_3 .ob-rec-source { font-family: "CNN", Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-stretch: normal; line-height: 1.63; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: left; color: #737373; } .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-p .ob-rec-source:before, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2 .ob-p .ob-rec-source:before, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4 .ob-p .ob-rec-source:before { content: 'Sponsored: '; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container~.ob-unit.ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container~.ob-unit.ob-rec-source { margin-left: 0; } .AR_36.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container { max-width: none; } /*****SMARTFEED*****/ .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container:before, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container:before { box-sizing: content-box; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-items-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-items-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-items-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-items-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-items-container { box-shadow: none; margin-bottom: 0; background-color:initial; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row { padding-top: 24px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container { max-width: none; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header { margin-left: 0px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-text, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-text { margin-left: 0px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-source, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-source { margin-left: 0px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob_what { top: 4px; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo { border-radius: 0; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container { margin-left: 0; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container { position: absolute; } .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo { position: absolute; top: -5px; z-index: 3; } /*****VIDEO ICON*****/ .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container { position: absolute; left: 8px; height: 32px; width: 32px; text-align: left; top: auto; bottom: 8px; object-fit: contain; } .AR_36.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon, .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon { opacity: 1.0; } Paid Content The Crazy Facial That Celebrities Say “Takes 10 Years Off” Your… Town & Country The 2019 Vehicles Are Released And The Best 2019 SUVS for… Auto Today | Sponsored Links /* dynamic basic css */ .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;height:50%;width:100%;text-align:center;top:25%;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_smartFeedLogo.min.svg') no-repeat center top;width:140px;height:21px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;background-size: 86px 23px;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{width:90px;height:20px;background-size:90px 20px;} } .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what{position:absolute;top:5px;right:0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic smartfeed-strip css */ .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-image-ratio {height:0px;line-height:0px;padding-top:60.0%;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-rec-image {width:100%;position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;opacity:0;transition:all 750ms;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-show {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;padding:0px 3px;background-color:#666;color:white;font-size:10px;line-height:15px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget {width:auto;min-width:180px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;min-width:50px;width:31.8%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogoAndName {display:inline-block;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:bottom;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:super;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {direction: ltr;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin-left:0;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin:0 0 0 2.3%; } .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {direction:ltr; } .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit {display:block;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-text {max-height:60.0px;overflow:hidden;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-source {font-style:italic;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {box-shadow:0px 2px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .28);margin-bottom:20px;padding-bottom:4px;padding-top:0;background-color:white;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {margin-left:10px;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-text {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-description {margin: 5px 10px 2px 10px; font-size:16px;} .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN {padding:0; margin-top:20px;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {clear: both;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {background-color: #4a90e2; bottom:10px;right:0px;left:auto; font-family: helvetica;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 0%;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what {padding-top: 0; margin-top:0px; top: 0;} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo {background-size: contain;border-radius: 50%;background-position: center;background-repeat: no-repeat} [data-idx="8"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container:not(:last-child) {box-shadow: none;margin-bottom: auto;} /* dynamic customized css */ .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:inherit;font-size:16px;color:black;padding-bottom:15px;padding-top:0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {max-width:400px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text {font-family:inherit;color:black;margin:5px 0 0px;text-align:left;line-height:1.25;font-size:16px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text:hover {color:#c00;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container {margin:5px 0 0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:4px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:14px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:inherit;margin:5px 0 0px;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;font-weight:400;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} Why This Medigap Plan Is the Most Popular ZagLine [Gallery] Anthony Bourdain’s Will Reveals He’s Left His Entire Fortune To One Individual Scribol Government Pays To Renovate Your Home If You Live Near Cincinnati (You Must Qualify) The Mortgage Savers /* dynamic basic css */ .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;height:50%;width:100%;text-align:center;top:25%;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_smartFeedLogo.min.svg') no-repeat center top;width:140px;height:21px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;background-size: 86px 23px;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{width:90px;height:20px;background-size:90px 20px;} } .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_what{position:absolute;top:5px;right:0px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic smartfeed-strip css */ .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-image-ratio {height:0px;line-height:0px;padding-top:60.0%;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-rec-image {width:100%;position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;opacity:0;transition:all 750ms;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-show {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;padding:0px 3px;background-color:#666;color:white;font-size:10px;line-height:15px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget {width:auto;min-width:120px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;min-width:50px;width:48.85%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogoAndName {display:inline-block;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:bottom;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:super;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {direction: ltr;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin-left:0;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin:0 0 0 2.3%; } .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {direction:ltr; } .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-unit {display:block;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-text {max-height:60.0px;overflow:hidden;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-source {font-style:italic;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {box-shadow:0px 2px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .28);margin-bottom:20px;padding-bottom:4px;padding-top:0;background-color:white;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {margin-left:10px;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-text {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-description {margin: 5px 10px 2px 10px; font-size:16px;} .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN {padding:0; margin-top:20px;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {clear: both;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {background-color: #4a90e2; bottom:10px;right:0px;left:auto; font-family: helvetica;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container {float: left;margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 10px;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container ~ .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 55px;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 0%;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob_what {padding-top: 0; margin-top:0px; top: 0;} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo {background-size: contain;border-radius: 50%;background-position: center;background-repeat: no-repeat} [data-idx="9"] .SFD_STP_1.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container:not(:last-child) {box-shadow: none;margin-bottom: auto;} /* dynamic customized css */ .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:inherit;font-size:16px;color:black;padding-bottom:15px;padding-top:0px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {max-width:400px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text {font-family:inherit;color:black;margin:5px 0 0px;text-align:left;line-height:1.25;font-size:16px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text:hover {color:#c00;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container {margin:5px 0 0px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:4px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:14px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:inherit;margin:5px 0 0px;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;font-weight:400;} .SFD_STP_1.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} Politics Supreme Court blocks deposition of Commerce chief Ross over… Bleacher Report Bleacher Report - MLB Hall of Famers disgusted by current MLB play /* dynamic basic css */ .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;height:50%;width:100%;text-align:center;top:25%;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_smartFeedLogo.min.svg') no-repeat center top;width:140px;height:21px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;background-size: 86px 23px;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{width:90px;height:20px;background-size:90px 20px;} } .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_what{position:absolute;top:5px;right:0px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic smartfeed-strip css */ .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-image-ratio {height:0px;line-height:0px;padding-top:60.0%;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-rec-image {width:100%;position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;opacity:0;transition:all 750ms;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-show {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;padding:0px 3px;background-color:#666;color:white;font-size:10px;line-height:15px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget {width:auto;min-width:180px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;min-width:50px;width:31.8%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogoAndName {display:inline-block;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:bottom;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:super;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {direction: ltr;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin-left:0;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin:0 0 0 2.3%; } .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {direction:ltr; } .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-unit {display:block;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-text {max-height:60.0px;overflow:hidden;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-source {font-style:italic;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {box-shadow:0px 2px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .28);margin-bottom:20px;padding-bottom:4px;padding-top:0;background-color:white;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {margin-left:10px;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-text {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-description {margin: 5px 10px 2px 10px; font-size:16px;} .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN {padding:0; margin-top:20px;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {clear: both;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {background-color: #4a90e2; bottom:10px;right:0px;left:auto; font-family: helvetica;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container {float: left;margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 10px;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container ~ .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 55px;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 0%;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob_what {padding-top: 0; margin-top:0px; top: 0;} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo {background-size: contain;border-radius: 50%;background-position: center;background-repeat: no-repeat} [data-idx="10"] .SFD_STP_3.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container:not(:last-child) {box-shadow: none;margin-bottom: auto;} /* dynamic customized css */ .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:inherit;font-size:16px;color:black;padding-bottom:15px;padding-top:0px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {max-width:400px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text {font-family:inherit;color:black;margin:5px 0 0px;text-align:left;line-height:1.25;font-size:16px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text:hover {color:#c00;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container {margin:5px 0 0px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:4px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:14px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:inherit;margin:5px 0 0px;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;font-weight:400;} .SFD_STP_3.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} Politics Donald Trump gets sweet revenge on Ted Cruz today in Texas Politics Hurricane forces Florida to ease voting rules CNN Underscored Underscored Genius morning habits, as told by five of the world's most successful people /* dynamic basic css */ .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;height:50%;width:100%;text-align:center;top:25%;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_smartFeedLogo.min.svg') no-repeat center top;width:140px;height:21px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;background-size: 86px 23px;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{width:90px;height:20px;background-size:90px 20px;} } .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_what{position:absolute;top:5px;right:0px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic smartfeed-strip css */ .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-image-ratio {height:0px;line-height:0px;padding-top:60.0%;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-rec-image {width:100%;position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;opacity:0;transition:all 750ms;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-show {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;padding:0px 3px;background-color:#666;color:white;font-size:10px;line-height:15px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget {width:auto;min-width:120px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;min-width:50px;width:48.85%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogoAndName {display:inline-block;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:bottom;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:super;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {direction: ltr;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin-left:0;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin:0 0 0 2.3%; } .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {direction:ltr; } .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-unit {display:block;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-text {max-height:60.0px;overflow:hidden;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-source {font-style:italic;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {box-shadow:0px 2px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .28);margin-bottom:20px;padding-bottom:4px;padding-top:0;background-color:white;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {margin-left:10px;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-text {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-description {margin: 5px 10px 2px 10px; font-size:16px;} .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN {padding:0; margin-top:20px;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {clear: both;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {background-color: #4a90e2; bottom:10px;right:0px;left:auto; font-family: helvetica;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 0%;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob_what {padding-top: 0; margin-top:0px; top: 0;} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo {background-size: contain;border-radius: 50%;background-position: center;background-repeat: no-repeat} [data-idx="11"] .SFD_STP_4.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container:not(:last-child) {box-shadow: none;margin-bottom: auto;} /* dynamic customized css */ .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:inherit;font-size:16px;color:black;padding-bottom:15px;padding-top:0px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {max-width:400px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text {font-family:inherit;color:black;margin:5px 0 0px;text-align:left;line-height:1.25;font-size:16px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text:hover {color:#c00;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container {margin:5px 0 0px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:4px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:14px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:inherit;margin:5px 0 0px;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;font-weight:400;} .SFD_STP_4.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} Leading Long Distance Moving Companies. Search for Long… Office Moving Companies | Sponsored Listings [Gallery] Each State Hilariously Depicted By One Stereotypical… Daily Stuff /* dynamic basic css */ .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;height:50%;width:100%;text-align:center;top:25%;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_smartFeedLogo.min.svg') no-repeat center top;width:140px;height:21px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;background-size: 86px 23px;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{width:90px;height:20px;background-size:90px 20px;} } .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what{position:absolute;top:5px;right:0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic smartfeed-strip css */ .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {position:relative;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-image-ratio {height:0px;line-height:0px;padding-top:60.0%;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-rec-image {width:100%;position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;opacity:0;transition:all 750ms;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container img.ob-show {opacity:1;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;padding:0px 3px;background-color:#666;color:white;font-size:10px;line-height:15px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget {width:auto;min-width:180px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:inline-block;vertical-align:top;min-width:50px;width:31.8%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogoAndName {display:inline-block;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:bottom;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandName {vertical-align:super;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {direction: ltr;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin-left:0;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container ~ .ob-dynamic-rec-container {margin:0 0 0 2.3%; } .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {direction:ltr; } .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit {display:block;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-text {max-height:60.0px;overflow:hidden;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-source {font-style:italic;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {box-shadow:0px 2px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .28);margin-bottom:20px;padding-bottom:4px;padding-top:0;background-color:white;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-header {margin-left:10px;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-text {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {margin-left: 10px; margin-right:10px;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-unit.ob-rec-description {margin: 5px 10px 2px 10px; font-size:16px;} .ob-smartfeed-wrapper .OUTBRAIN {padding:0; margin-top:20px;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container {clear: both;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-label {background-color: #4a90e2; bottom:10px;right:0px;left:auto; font-family: helvetica;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 0%;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob_what {padding-top: 0; margin-top:0px; top: 0;} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-rec-logo-container .ob-rec-logo {background-size: contain;border-radius: 50%;background-position: center;background-repeat: no-repeat} [data-idx="12"] .SFD_STP_2.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container:not(:last-child) {box-shadow: none;margin-bottom: auto;} /* dynamic customized css */ .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:inherit;font-size:16px;color:black;padding-bottom:15px;padding-top:0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {max-width:400px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text {font-family:inherit;color:black;margin:5px 0 0px;text-align:left;line-height:1.25;font-size:16px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-text:hover {color:#c00;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-logo-container {margin:5px 0 0px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:4px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:14px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:inherit;color:black;padding:0px 0 0px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:inherit;margin:5px 0 0px;line-height:1.25;font-size:13px;font-weight:400;} .SFD_STP_2.ob-smartfeed-strip-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} Cincinnati Ohio: These Stair Lifts are Better Than You Ever Thought Possible Yahoo! Search The Secret Behind Mayweather’s Amazing Smile Revealed SNOW 30 TV Shows Of The 70s That Were Total Failures ALOT Living /* dynamic basic css */ .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container {margin:0;padding:0;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container .ob-clearfix {display:block;width:100%;float:none;clear:both;height:0px;line-height:0px;font-size:0px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-widget-items-container.ob-multi-row {padding-top: 2%;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-container {position:relative;margin:0;padding;0;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link, .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {text-decoration:none;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon-container {position:absolute;left:0;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon {display:inline-block;height:100%;float:none;opacity:0.7;transition: opacity 500ms;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-video-icon:hover {opacity:1;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_what{direction:ltr;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .AR_13 .ob_what a:after {content: "";;;background-image: url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/achoice.svg');background-size:75% 75%;width:12px;height:12px;padding-left:4px;display:inline-block;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-position:right center;border-left:1px solid #999;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:11px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_amelia, .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_logo, .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo, .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo, .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{vertical-align:baseline !important;display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_smartFeedLogo.min.svg') no-repeat center top;width:140px;height:21px;} @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:20px; background-size:67px 40px;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_feed_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_feed_logo@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:86px;height:23px;background-size: 86px 23px;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_sfeed_logo{width:90px;height:20px;background-size:90px 20px;} } .AR_13.ob-widget:hover .ob_amelia, .AR_13.ob-widget:hover .ob_logo, .AR_13.ob-widget:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_what{text-align:right;} .AR_13.ob-widget .ob-rec-image-container .ob-rec-image {display:block;} /* dynamic classic css */ .AR_13.ob-classic-layout {width:auto;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout:after {content:"";display:block;height:0px;float:none;clear:both;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-section {width:50%;box-sizing:border-box;-moz-box-sizing:border-box;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-section > * {margin:0px 10px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-section { float:left; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-header, .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container, .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container .ob-unit{direction:ltr;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {display:block;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container:hover {text-decoration:underline;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-unit{display:inline;margin-bottom:10px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-header {font-weight:bold;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-text {} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-source {font-style:italic;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-date {font-weight:bold;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-brandName, .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo-container, .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-unit.ob-rec-brandLogoAndName, .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {display:inline-block;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {vertical-align: bottom;} /* dynamic customized css */ .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-header {font-family:inherit;font-size:16px;color:#fff;padding-bottom:32px;padding-top:0px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-items-container {padding:0px 0px 0px 10px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container {color:#262626;margin-bottom:0px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container:hover {color:#c00;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-link {color:#262626;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-link:hover {color:#c00;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-text {color:#262626;font-family:CNN,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;;font-size:16px;line-height:1.25;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-source {font-family:CNN,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;;color:#737373;font-size:14px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-date {font-family:CNN,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;;font-size:12px;color:black;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-author {font-family:CNN,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;;font-size:12px;color:black;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-description {font-family:CNN,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;;font-size:12px;color:black;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-brandName {font-family:CNN,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif;;padding:$dynamic:TitleMarginTop$px 0 $dynamic:TitleMarginBottom$px;line-height:1.25;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-brandLogo {width:20px;height:20px;} .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-section.ob-last { padding-left: 2%; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-section { width: 48%; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-header { color: #404040; font-family: CNN Condensed, CNN, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-stretch: condensed; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; text-transform: uppercase; border-bottom: 1px solid #e6e6e6; height: 36px; line-height: 1.43; letter-spacing: 2px; padding-top: 7px; margin: 0; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-header::after { content: ""; display: block; width: 16px; height: 4px; background-color: #737373; position: relative; top: 8px; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-last .ob-widget-header::after { background-color: #1a6aff; } /*container*/ .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-widget-items-container { margin: 0; padding: 0; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container:not(:first-of-type) { border-top: 1px solid #d9d9d9; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container { min-height: 63px; padding: 7px 0; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container:hover { text-decoration: none; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container:hover .ob-rec-text, .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-dynamic-rec-container:hover .ob-rec-video::before { color: #c00; } /*title source*/ .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-text { font-family: CNN Condensed, CNN, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; font-stretch: condensed; line-height: 1.5; letter-spacing: -0.1px; text-align: left; color: #1a1a1a; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-source { font-family: CNN Condensed, CNN, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-style: italic; font-stretch: condensed; color: #959595; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 300; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-video img { display: none; } .AR_13.ob-classic-layout .ob-rec-video::before { display: inline-block; margin-top: -3px; content: "\f147"; font-family: cnn-icons; color: #a6a6a6; font-style: normal; speak: none; text-decoration: inherit; text-rendering: optimizeLegibility; text-transform: none; vertical-align: middle; font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.25; font-weight: 300; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; } .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_what { border-top: 2px solid #e6e6e6; position: relative; top: 10px; } .AR_13.ob-widget .ob_what a { width: 93px; height: 14px; font-family: CNN Condensed, CNN, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-stretch: condensed; line-height: normal; letter-spacing: 1px; color: #959595; text-transform: uppercase; } Paid Content Tesla Semi looks set to tower over the competition Roadshow Enter A Name, Wait 13 Seconds, Brace Yourself www.peoplewhiz.com Gone With The Wind Secrets The Actors Were Forbidden To Reveal Definition Cornell MD "I Beg Americans To Throw Out This Vegetable Now" landers.unitednaturals.com More from CNN This stylish standing desk could revolutionize your work routine CNN Underscored Garmin releases GPS smartwatch that holds up to 500 songs CNN Underscored Kelly grabbed Lewandowski by the collar last winter How Netflix outgrew 'House of Cards' and 'Orange is the New… Recommended by .voterDiv .ob_bctrl{display:none;} .ob_pdesc IMG{border:none;} .HOP_69 .ob_what{direction:ltr;text-align:right;clear:both;padding:5px 10px 0px;} .HOP_69 .ob_what a{color:#999;font-size:10px;font-family:arial;text-decoration: none;} .HOP_69 .ob_what.ob-hover:hover a{text-decoration: underline;} .HOP_69 .ob_clear{clear:both;} .HOP_69 .ob_amelia, .HOP_69 .ob_logo, .HOP_69 .ob_text_logo {display:inline-block;vertical-align:text-bottom;padding:0px 5px;box-sizing:content-box;-moz-box-sizing:content-box;-webkit-box-sizing:content-box;} .HOP_69 .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; } .HOP_69 .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; } .HOP_69 .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px; } @media only screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),(min-resolution: 192dpi) { .HOP_69 .ob_amelia{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_16x16@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:16px;height:16px;margin-bottom:-2px; background-size:16px 32px;} .HOP_69 .ob_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_logo_67x12@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:12px; background-size:67px 24px;} .HOP_69 .ob_text_logo{background:url('https://widgets.outbrain.com/images/widgetIcons/ob_text_logo_67x22@2x.png') no-repeat center top;width:67px;height:22px; background-size:67px 44px;} } .HOP_69:hover .ob_amelia, .HOP_69:hover .ob_logo, .HOP_69:hover .ob_text_logo{background-position:center bottom;} .HOP_69 .ob_container{width:100%;position:relative;overflow:hidden;} .HOP_69 .strip-img{width:150px;height:150px;border:none !important;margin:0px !important;display:block;padding:0px !important;} .HOP_69 .item-link-container{text-decoration:none;} .HOP_69 .strip-rec-link-title{font-size:13px;font-weight:normal;line-height:16px;} .HOP_69 .strip-rec-link-source{font-size:12px;line-height:16px} .HOP_69 .strip-like{padding-bottom:4px;font-size:14px;line-height:16px;height:20px;font-weight:bold;} .HOP_69 .item-container a,.HOP_69 .item-container a:hover,.HOP_69 .item-container a:visited{border:medium none;text-decoration:none;} .HOP_69 .ob_video{border:medium none;position:absolute;top:5px;left:5px} .HOP_69 .ob-rec-link-img{position:relative;} .HOP_69 .wbr:before {content: \"\200B\"} .HOP_69 .ob_container_recs{width:100%;position:absolute;} .HOP_69 .ob_container_recs A{display:inline;direction:ltr;text-align:left;} .HOP_69 .ob-text-content A{width:100%;padding:0px 0px;} .HOP_69 .ob-text-content{padding-top:6px;} .HOP_69 .item-container A.ob-text-content{display:block;} .HOP_69 .ob_container_recs .item-container{float:left;direction:ltr;width:152px;margin-bottom:300px;padding-right:12px;} .HOP_69 .ob_container_recs .ob-last{padding-right:0px;} .HOP_69 .ob_container_shadow_outer{position:static;width:100%;} .HOP_69 .ob_container_shadow .item-container-shadow{position:static;overflow-x:hidden;width:0px;float:left;direction:ltr;} .HOP_69 .ob_container_shadow .item-container{width:152px;visibility:hidden;float:left} .HOP_69 .ob-oc-label {border-color:#FFF;border-style:solid;border-width:2px 2px 0 0;color:#FFF;float:left;direction:ltr;font-family:verdana,arial,sans-serif;font-size:9px;font-size-adjust:none;font-stretch:normal;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;padding:2px 4px; position:relative; top:-18px; z-index:10;clear:both;} /* new cnn politics source styling */ .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .ob_org_header { display: block; width: 100%; color: #1a1a1a; height: 31px; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; border-bottom: solid 1px #e6e6e6; margin-bottom: 10px; font-family: CNN Condensed,CNN,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-stretch: condensed; line-height: 1.43; letter-spacing: 2px; color: #1a1a1a; text-transform: uppercase; } .HOP_69 .strip-rec-link-title { width: 234px; font-family: CNN Condensed,CNN,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-stretch: condensed; line-height: 1.5; letter-spacing: -0.1px; text-align: left; color: #1a1a1a; letter-spacing: normal; font-weight:300px; } .HOP_69 .ob-text-content { border-bottom: solid 1px #e6e6e6 !important; margin-top: 0px; } .HOP_69 span.ob_org_header:after { content: ''; display: BLOCK; width: 16px; height: 4px; background-color: #1a6aff; position: relative; top: 6px; } .HOP_69 .ob-text-content { padding: 0 0 0 80px; height: auto; } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .odb_div:hover a { color: #c00 !important; } .HOP_69 .odb_div { padding-bottom: 5px; } .HOP_69 a.rec-link { color: #fff; font-weight: 400; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.33333; } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .ob-rec-link-img { margin: 0px 10px 10px 0; border-top: solid 1px #404040 solid; } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .ob_source { display: none; } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .ob_source { font-style: italic; color: #737373; font-size: 15px; font-weight: lighter; } .OUTBRAIN .ob_bctrl img { width: auto; } #ob_modal_inner { z-index: 214748364 !important; } #ob_modal_inner img { width: auto } .HOP_69 .ob_container_recs { width: 100%; position: absolute; height: auto; clear: both; } .HOP_69 .ob_container_recs .item-container { float: left; direction: ltr; width: 300px; margin-bottom: 5px; padding-right: 6px; float: left; display: block; height: 79px; display: block; /* clear: both; */ } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .ob-rec-link-img { margin: 0px 10px 10px 0; border-top: solid 1px #404040 solid; float: left; } .HOP_69 .ob-text-content { padding: 0px 0 0 68px; height: 68px; /* display: inline-block; */ /* position: absolute; */ width: 330px; float: left; /* display: inline; */ position: absolute; font-weight:300; } .HOP_69 .strip-rec-link-source.ob-lcolor { display: none; } .HOP_69 .ob_container { width: 100%; position: relative; overflow: hidden; height: 420px; } .HOP_69 .strip-rec-link-title.ob-tcolor { font-family: CNN Condensed,CNN,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Utkal,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; color: #262626; width: 80%; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.25; margin-left: 7px; } .HOP_69 .strip-rec-link-title.ob-tcolor:hover { color: #c00; } .HOP_69 .strip-video-img { display: none; } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .ob-rec-link-img { position: relative; width: 100%; } .HOP_69 .ob_video { background: rgba(12, 12, 12, .3); color: #fefefe; padding: 5px; font-family: CNN, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, Utkal, sans-serif; font-weight: 400; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; font-size: 18px; font-size: 1.125rem; line-height: 1; position: absolute; bottom: 0; top: inherit; left: 0; } .HOP_69 .ob_video:before { content: "\f147"; font-family: cnn-icons; } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .ob-rec-link-img:hover .ob_video:before { color: #c00; } .ob_strip_container.HOP_69 { height: 210px; } .HOP_69 .strip-img { width: 60px; height: 60px; } .OUTBRAIN .HOP_69 .item-container:hover .ob-text-content .strip-rec-link-title { color: #c00;}

      Still have to rub that one in huh?

    1. Why does boredom seem painful? Shouldn’t it just be boring?

      While self-shattering is nonviolent, there are many other ways that thanatos, the destructive instinct, is twinned with boredom

      Renata Salecl acknowledges the twinning of boredom and aggression when she writes that the society “which allegedly gives priority to the individual’s freedoms over submission to group causes” (2006) and filters choice through the prism of “opportunity cost” is one that “causes aggression towards [the self] and apathy in relation to contemporary social problems which are completely ignored by the emporium of individualist choices” (2013a).

      Sometimes the aggression turns outward, as well. The Internet troll as bored, isolated malcontent is well established as a cultural trope and borne out by empirical data (Sanghani 2013). Liam Mitchell (2013) even ups the ante on this notion by proposing that the troll tackles the “desire for desires” problem by erecting “a conscious barrier to unconscious desire” by eliding investment in its principal object, which is amusement at another’s expense, or “lulz.” In Mattathias Schwartz’s (2013) formulation, lulz is “a quasi-thermodynamic exchange between the sensitive and the cruel”; humour derived from “disrupting another’s emotional equilibrium.” In pursuing lulz, the troll establishes “a distance from other trolls (with whom he may or may not feel a bond) and from the people who are governed by normal formations of desire” (Mitchell 2013). Insofar as the troll’s pursuits “bypass or forestall normal formations of desire, they may be characterized as non-subjective.” This is significant because, as Mitchell says, our choices only “have lasting meaning, for others and for ourselves … when we can be held accountable to our promises,” and this is impossible in a condition of both online anonymity and refusal of subjectivity.

      The study “Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind” (Wilson et al. 2014) asked participants to spend some time alone thinking in an empty room. There were three study conditions, in all of which participants generally gave high ratings of boredom. In one condition the experimenters gave people the option of giving themselves a mild electric shock. 67% of men and 25% of women shocked themselves. So goes the saying “the devil makes work for idle hands.”

      Or more broadly: there are many ways, as Baudelaire said in Les Fleurs du Mal (1857, xxv), that “ennui makes your soul cruel.”

    1. As students move through the grades, they learn to use a general set of strategies, such as predicting, questioning, and summarizing a text, to support their comprehension and response to texts across the curriculum.

      Students are constantly learning ways that best work for them when reading something new or something challenging. I think that it is important that we help them fine tune the strategies that they already know work for them as well as include new ones that may be content specific

    1. One might, for example, speak to a microphone, in the manner described in connection with the speech controlled typewriter, and thus make his selections. It would certainly beat the usual file clerk.

      The note of technocratic celebration is so striking here in the age of Alexa and Siri. Now that we're all thinking about "weapons of math destruction" and the asymmetries that characterize the relationship between ordinary citizens and Big Data in so many contexts, it's strange to hear this sunny celebration of frictionless data in the hands of, well, everyone.

    1. the Palestinians’reward for their good behavior, in the form of a buttocks aimed directly at their faces

      I love how Sulieman showed the Palestinian POV, both literally and figuratively. There was clearly just the Israeli side dictating the order. Although they are awaiting the mayor, once he arrives he waits to receive his summons from the Israeli side, hardly appearing like a figure that holds any sort of power. While I understand Sulieman’s point of demonstrating that the Israeli forces came in practically bullying the mayor of Nazareth into signing the terms of surrender, but I feel like Sulieman portrays the mayor as being way too weak of a figurehead. He shows almost no sort of resistance at all, reflecting poorly on his state, while the Palestinian public seem to be the only ones taking action and resisting, as seen in the conflicts on the streets against the Israeli troops. Unless there a disparity or conflict between the public and the higher ups in government, leading the public to not respect their mayor (and thus this depiction of the mayor may be correct in the public’s POV), I feel like this hurts the nationalistic cause that we see in other areas of the film. What do you guys think? Would a different portrayal of the mayor, perhaps as stronger or more resistant or is this just one of Sulieman’s many satirical elements?

    1. it may have been misperceived as a lover’s spat by someone who just wanted to go back to sleep.

      It's scary thought, but we can be very good at lying to ourselves and justifying our own immoral actions when we have the motivation. This is chilling idea, but I think it's ultimately true.

    2. Whenever we are feeling sad, we can use helping someone else as a positive mood boost to feel happier.

      This textbook focuses much more on the intangible rewards of helping people, which I think are often the most applicable. While sometimes our motivations may be social or monetary in the case of altruistic professions, often time we are seeking an emotional gain.

    1. he diffi cult choice between the two foci is captured in Reinhold Neibuhr’s prayer (now best known as Alcoholics Anonymous’s “Serenity Prayer”), which asks for the serenity to bear the things we cannot change, the courage to change the things we can, and the wisdom to tell the difference.

      Since one of the earlier articles mentioned this i've been thinking about the quote a lot. I have a family friend who is in AA and this is the quote that AA uses to empower their recovery individuals. I think that if we all took this to heart, we may live in a kinder and less "helpful" (that is, trying to be helpful) community/world.

    1. It is not that the Author may not 'come back' in the Text, in his text, but he then does so as a 'guest'. If he is a novelist, he is inscribed in the novel like one of his characters, figured in the carpet; no longer privileged, paternal, aletheological, his inscription is ludic.

      I love this passage. Once you publish something, it ceases to be yours, or at least exclusively yours. If you return to it, you are just another reader or critic. Think of all the readings you've been to when someone from the peanut gallery disagrees with the author's take on the motives of a character or the after-life of the plot! In a few weeks, we will literalize this idea via the Ivanhoe concept, having Melville visit Billy Budd as a "guest" among its characters, narrator, critics, editors, etc.

    1. [AUDIENCE APPLAUDING] We've been talking about identities. Names are actually an important part of our identities. My name is Binna Kandola. I was doing some research a few years ago. I'm a psychologist. I was doing some research a few years ago and had to issue some questionnaires to a group of students. One of the tools of a psychologist is you test and then you retest. So I went to his college, I tested the students. And a few months later, I came back. I was testing the same students again. The principal, who I had met before, was introducing me to the two lecturers whose session I was about to interrupt. And he said, this is Janice, and this is James. And I'd like to introduce you to Mr. Tandoori. And their mouths dropped open. And I thought, I better put him straight here. I said, actually my name's not Tandoori. My name's not Tandoori, it's Kandola. It's chicken Kandola. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] We can all make mistakes. Well, I'm a psychologist, I work with organizations. One of the things I noticed—I work in the diversity area. One of the things I noticed a few years ago now was that our clients were coming up to us and saying, they've been working in the diversity field for 10, 15 years. They'd made progress. But if they had thought about it 10 or 15 years before, they probably would have liked to have made more progress than they had done. And this was universal. It didn't matter about the sector, it was public or private, it didn't matter, it was manufacturing, it was finance, it was everywhere. And of course clearly something was going on here. There's something getting in the way. And I thought, this is worth investigating a bit further. So I did a big literature review, I did some studies. And it quickly became apparent that there is a problem. And the problem is us. We are the problem. And the problem is we're all biased without exception. So there's 7 billion people on the planet, and the 7 billion people have bias of some shape or form. The world is not divided up into those people who have bias and those who don't. It is divided up, though, into those people who recognize they have bias and those people who think they have none. And ironically— and the work on unconscious bias is full of ironies— one of the ironies is that those people who believe they have no bias probably are the most biased because there's no reflection going on. If I believed I had no bias, why on earth would I ever need to reflect on my behavior, review my decisions, or change anything about myself? Because I'm perfectly content in what I'm doing. So what I want to do in this session is actually just introduce you to how the biases we're talking about apply in organizations, and some of the things that we can do, perhaps, to minimize the effects of some of the biases that we have. So there are two lines there. There are two orange lines. There is a small one in the middle between the three blocks, and there is a thicker one at the top. Which one looks longer to you? Top one. Yeah. The top one looks longer. It's not going to help this, but— because it looks like it gets smaller as it goes down. But they are in fact the same size. They're the same size. The illusion works. And I know they're the same size because my assistant did it for me. She said, is this what you want? I said, no, they're meant to be the same size. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] I actually measured them, so I can assure you they are the same size. And the converging lines means that we automatically turn that two-dimensional image into a three-dimensional one. It's automatic, we can't help it. If something is further away and it looks like it's the same size as something that's closer, it must, by definition, be bigger, right? So we interpret the whole time. We did a study three years ago. We asked people to take part in a psychology experiment. They walked into the room. At the bottom end of the room there was a counter with somebody standing behind the counter with a sign above them saying "experiment." They walk over to the counter, where they are handed a consent form. They complete the consent form, hand it back to the person behind the counter, who says, oh, I need to staple this. They duck down underneath the counter, staple the form, come back up, give it back to the person, say, can you go to the room over there, please? What they didn't realize was that was the beginning and the end of our experiment. Right? That was the beginning and the end of our experiment. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] The person who went down underneath the table was not the same person who came up. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] And in the room over there, people were asked, what did you notice? And people noticed the counter, noticed the form, stapled, the sign that said experiment. But something like 80% of the time, people did not notice it was a different person. They did not notice it was different. It doesn't sound credible, but it is true, they didn't notice. And it wasn't like we use identical twins. They were two different people. We had them wearing similar clothes to begin with, but in the end, we had them wearing very different clothes. But there were two changes that we could never make without them noticing. We could never change their gender or their color without the other person noticing. We notice some difference more than others. It's automatic. It's like that. We just notice. Noticing isn't necessarily bad, but as we've heard, actually there are associations or stereotypes associated with different groups. And the groups— the difference we notice more than others are color, gender, age, and physical disability. And clearly that's related to the visual cues that we're picking up on. But we notice difference. And the difference actually has associations with them, which are related to stereotypes. Who is that? Yeah. It's Barack Obama is your president, upside down. It kind of is, it kind of isn't. To paraphrase some British comedians, he's got all the right features, just not necessarily in the right order. His mouth and his eyes were, in fact, the right way up the first time, when he was upside down. His mouth and his eyes where, in fact, the right way. They are now upside down. There are two things going on here. One, we're very quick decision makers. Once we've made a decision about something, we stop scanning, right? We've made our minds up, we stop scanning. So we're not processing anymore. And secondly, it's about experience and expectations. We've never experienced him looking like this, and so we don't expect it. We create in effect, a self-fulfilling prophecy. So in interviews, for example, we know that untrained interviewers will make their minds up about a candidate within the first two minutes. And clearly, they're basing it on some physical characteristics, and maybe color, gender, age, disability. The points I was making a moment ago. But it may be related to other things, it may be the grip when you shake hands, how firm is that handshake? We like people who do give us a firm handshake and look you straight in the eye. I was in Canada earlier this year. I was told that First Nation people— some First Nation groups in Canada are told, it's disrespectful to shake somebody hard by the hand. So we're making these very quick, superficial judgments about people, which may not be accurate. The second thing is about experience and expectations. Women can't park a car. can't parallel park, can't reverse park. Lack of spatial reasoning means you can't do it. All right? So I was in my local supermarket on Saturday and somebody is taking 12 goes to reverse park into that bay. And I'm thinking, why don't you just give it to your husband? And then you drive past and you see it is a man behind the wheel and you think, what sort of man are you? [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] Now, a piece of research was published last year in Britain on this topic of parking. And you got two groups of people asked to park a car. The women in the first group are told, we know you can't park, we know you can't park, lack of spatial reasoning and all that, we know you can't park, just do the best you can. It's only cones, it's only cones. You'll never damage the car, you'll never damage the car. And if you flatten a cone, we'll replace it with another one, we've got loads more available. All right? Do the best you can. The women in the second group are told, all this stuff you've heard about lack of spatial reasoning and women can't park a car, it's all a load of rubbish. You can park a car just as well as any man. So why don't you prove everybody wrong? So you've got prove everybody wrong versus do the best you can. And the women in the second group not only performed as well as the men, they actually outperformed the men. Whereas the women in the first group actually significantly underperformed. So we can create our own self-fulfilling prophecies. We can actually— by our own expectations, we can impact other people's behavior and see what we're expecting to see. In this particular image here, a lot of people see— there's one predominant image that people see here. Sometimes people see more than one thing, sometimes people don't see the most dominant thing, they see other things. What do you see? A dog? Yeah? Yeah. There's a dog. A lot of people see a dog. I was with a group recently, and nearly everybody in the room could see a dog. And one of their colleagues couldn't see a dog, and another one of his colleagues helped him out and said of course you can see the dog, it's below the whale. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] Strictly speaking, strictly speaking, there's no outline of anything there. There's two things going on there. One, we don't like random. We're always trying to make sense of the world around us. And secondly, I told you there was something there to be seen. All right? I told you there was something there to be seen. I created a motivation, a goal in you to start searching for something. And it's an example of what's known as priming. And priming are the ways in which we can be influenced without realizing that we have been influenced. Ways in which we can be influenced without realizing that we have been influenced. A French psychologist had two groups of interviewers about to interview the same people. They're interviewing the same candidates. One group of people is told, go and meet your candidate, bring them back to your office, and then, when you're finished, escort them from the premises. The other group of people is told, meeting the same people, remember, are told, go meet your elderly candidates, bring them back to your office, and when you finish, escort from the premises. What they found was, the people who thought they were going to be meeting an elderly candidate actually walked more slowly to meet them. Their behavior had changed. Their behavior had changed even before they'd met the people. It was clearly a set of— there was clearly a set of associations that they were making, elderly, aged, infirm, slow, I'd better slow down. And whether those associations were conscious or unconscious, they were clearly being made or impacting and actually having an impact on their behavior. So priming is another way. So we've got two sources of bias. We notice difference, and we notice some differences more than others. And secondly, about the way that we interpret the world around us. Now, there's a football team, a soccer team, that I support, it's called Aston Villa. All right? You may not have heard of them. But we did win the European championship in 1982. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] Our local rivals are a team called Birmingham City. They're two miles away. Literally next door to one another. So our local rival team is called Birmingham City. Intellectually, I know that the fans must be the same. It's the same catchment area, it's the same city, basically the same people. We must be the same. Intellectually, I know that. Emotionally, I know we are better than them. And not only that, my children know it, too. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] I think it's one of the proudest achievements I may have had as a parent. But anyway— we form groups. We're very social animals. So the third area of bias is about the way we form groups. We form in-groups and out-groups. The groups that we're part of, they're our in-groups, and then, by definition, the other groups are our out-groups. And there are some very interesting things that happen. We actually view our in-group differently from the out-group. So we actually view them differently in the sense that we see people in the in-group as individuals and we accept difference. We actually think about them differently. So actually we are more likely to remember the positive contributions from in-group members and we're more likely to remember the things that they do. And thirdly, we behave differently towards in-group members. We are more likely to make sacrifices and we're more likely to be helpful towards other in-group members. And we view out-groups, consequently, in a very different way. So out-groups are viewed as being homogeneous. They're are all the same. We minimize difference. The French, dot, dot, dot. You complete that sentence in your heads. It doesn't matter whether you finish that sentence positively or negatively, the French will have been treated as a homogeneous group of people. They are all the same. We will remember the negative things they've done, we will forget their contributions, and generally speaking, we won't be so helpful towards them. This can have an impact in terms of societies. It can also have an impact in teams. In a team, you could actually get groups of people who— create in-groups and out-groups within your teams. And it may be that we value the contributions of some people more than others. We don't listen to people. We actually miss out on the talent that's available to us. So what can we do? Well, one of the things that we can do is actually turn the mirror on ourselves. Instead of thinking that bias is somebody else's problem, which is what we tend to do, it's actually a problem for me. One of the ways that we can do— one of the things we can do to increase our self-awareness is actually to do some tests of unconscious bias. One of them developed— it's actually on the Harvard website. One of the academics who developed it is actually here at Harvard, but there's two other academics who developed it, as well. It's called the Implicit Association Test. If you Google IAT, it will take you to the test. It's easier to do than to describe It's a reaction time test. Basically stimuli come to the screen and you react as quickly as you can. Right? And I did this for the first time 10 years ago. In the United Kingdom, I'm described as an Asian person. So people from the Indian subcontinent are described as Asian. And I did the first test. What I gravitated towards, for kind of obvious reasons, was Asian and white faces, and good and bad words. Asian, white faces, good and bad words, they come up on screen. You react as quickly as you can. Just to go over my background again, I am a psychologist, it is a science, very rigorous, highly methodical, very analytical, highly statistical. And also I work in the diversity field, so I'm not judging people, not stereotyping them, not making assumptions. So essentially, the fairest person in Britain. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] I took this test. And it gave me a result at the end. It said that I had a bias associating Asian people with good. All right? This never surprises anybody, but it really shocked me. So given my background education, experience, and training, I did exactly what you'd expect me to do in the circumstances. I went, OK, best of three. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] So I did it again. Got the same result. Best of five. Got the same result. I did it three times in a row and I got the same result three times. And I walked away from my desk thinking, what a load of rubbish. What a load of rubbish. I'm clearly the fairest person in Britain. And that test did not validate it, so the test has to be wrong. The next day, we were making a DVD. I was in studios in North London. Seven actors. Didn't know them. We broke for lunch. There's a table with sandwiches on there. And there's just chairs scattered in the room. I picked up a sandwich, sat down next to one of the actors. And as soon as I sat down, I realized I'd parked myself next to the only other Asian person in the room. Right? Now, my act was unconscious. At no point did I think, aha, Asian person, I must go and sit next to him. My act was unconscious, but also it was not random. Unconscious, but not random. I may not be aware of it, but something impelled me to go in one direction rather than another. And just that self awareness is actually an important first step in, kind of, tackling things to do with bias. And the secondary, ridiculous as it may seem, is actually just to tell ourselves not to do it. Just tell ourselves to stop. I am not going to do it. It takes a conscious effort. The unconscious processes are obviously wearing away, but through a conscious effort we can actually make ourselves stop. I am not going to stereotype. You can actually— one of the things that we've done actually is to actually set fairness as a goal when you're making decisions. Set fairness as a goal. And we've found that that can reduce the levels of unconscious biases exhibited by a group of people. And you can take it a step further. Give yourself an instruction. When I'm doing these interviews, then I will do— I will try my hardest to be as objective as possible. Or when I'm doing interviews, then I will not stereotype. Those when-then statements we found to be very powerful. And we actually found that you can reduce unconscious bias by those mechanisms. Very simple things. And there's lots of other things that you can do. I'm just concentrating on some of the more straightforward things that we can undertake. So we can turn the mirror on ourselves, tell ourselves to stop and instruct ourselves to be fair and set fairness as the goal. And the final point, essentially, is about everybody taking responsibility for this. There is a particular responsibility for leaders to role model the behavior. If a leader can actually talk about topics like bias, actually role model the behavior that they're expecting of other people, it has a huge impact on other people. But we can also challenge one another. I know it can be difficult in some circumstances so maybe not challenge on our own. Maybe get some allies with us and actually challenge collectively. But actually, this challenge and questioning, are we being fair here? Challenge doesn't have to be unpleasant, maybe just like telling a story. It may be asking a question, it doesn't have to be aggressive. This process of challenging is actually important to make us rethink decisions. I did some work with an accounting firm a couple of years ago. Six partners about to make promotion decisions the next day. And I met with them and said— I told them this stuff about bias. I subsequently found out that there was one candidate who met all the criteria, who they— five out of the six was going to reject. Met all the criteria. Five out of six were going to reject him. And the sixth one said, well, why are we turning him down? He meets all the criteria. He said because he's too big, he's actually too big. He needs to lose weight. And he said, so you're saying if he loses five or six stones, if he would have come in five or six stones lighter, we would have appointed him? And they went, yeah. It's for his own good. So if he loses the weight, comes back next year, we'll appoint him. He said, but what about all that training we did on bias yesterday? He said, yeah, well, that's about women and minorities, isn't it? It's not about big people. But they changed their minds. He stuck to his guns and obviously he's in a peer group. That makes it easier. But he stuck to his guns and they actually did appoint him. So challenge. So there are three, kind of, areas of bias that operate in organizations. One is, we notice difference and there are associations. And there's some difference we notice more than others. And there are associations and stereotypes associated with those particular groups. Secondly, it's the way we interpret the world around us: priming, quick decision making, experience and expectations. And thirdly, it's about the way that we socialize in groups. And we have a different set of expectations for in-groups than we do for out-groups. And there are three things that we can do. I mean, lots of other things, but three that we could do immediately. One is that we can turn the mirror on ourselves. Instead of blaming other people, actually just kind of reflect on our own behavior, increasing our own self awareness. That can make a difference. Secondly, we can actually just tell ourselves not to do it. Consciously try not to display bias in decisions we're making. And the third thing we can do is actually to challenge, in an appropriate manner, people around us. Get us to review decisions. And leaders in particular, have a higher role here in terms of being role models to other people in the organization. So finally, I just want to leave you with the thoughts of a British broadcaster and comedian, Jeremy Hardy. He did a program about prejudice. And he was looking at various phobias, Islamophobia, xenophobia, homophobia, amongst others. And he's made the point, actually, that these fears and these hatreds are genuinely felt. They are feelings that are genuinely felt. But all phobias are genuinely felt. There are, in fact, people who have a fear of buttons. Believe it or not, there are people who have the fear of buttons. And he points out that actually— and, of course, this is a genuine fear that they have, and we shouldn't revile them for having this particular phobia, but we should gently point out to them that whilst they may have this fear of buttons, the fault actually lies with them and not with the buttons. Thank you.

      ONE MORE TIME!!!

    2. Unconscious, but not random.

      Our biases are so deep into us that we make decisions unconsciously based on them, and we may not even know. We may think that we just sitting next to a random person, or starting a conversation with a random person, but we identify our in-group and are automatically, unconsciously, drawn to them as a result. In order to stay away from the out-group, the "others."

    3. I know that the fans must be the same. It's the same catchment area, it's the same city, basically the same people. We must be the same. Intellectually, I know that. Emotionally, I know we are better than them. And not only that, my children know it, too. [AUDIENCE LAUGHS] I think it's one of the proudest achievements I may have had as a parent.

      most sports fans can relate to this, it doesn't make sense but we all have a team we hate, and apply that to their fans

    1. attending to the outrageous feels less like writing a check and more like setting up an automatic withdrawal.

      I am a member of the Human Right Campaign, which is rights for the LGBTQ community in the workplace, and when I signed up I didn't realize that it was a monthly payment system, but I did it anyways. In one of my classes we studied the HRC and how they're run by money and they may not seem as good as you'd think they are, so I canceled my membership.

    1. At an early age, webegin learning cultural norms for what is considered masculine and feminine. For example,children may associate long hair or dresses with femininity. Later in life, as adults, we oftenconform to these norms by behaving in gender-specific ways: as men, we build houses; aswomen, we bake cookies

      This statment is as true as can be as an young girl I was always taught that is was an girls job to take care of the inside of the house. It was an girls job to take care of her husband. It was her responsibility to make sure he had an hot meal and clean clothes and come home to a clean house and well kept wife. Although in my personal opinion I think this should be changed I do not feel that there should be things as gender roles boys and girls should be free to do as they please.

  6. Sep 2018
    1. (gender role) representations of biological sex.

      I think that now and days, particularly we are seeing some change in the views of traditional gender roles in the USA. We are seeing more women in the workforce as well as seeing men taking the more at home role and this change may be due to the increasing of societal participation by women.

    1. We stopped a while in the little garden, where Miss Cynthia gave me some magnificent big marigolds to put away for seed, and was much pleased because I was so delighted with her flowers. It was a gorgeous little garden to look at, with its red poppies, and blue larkspur, and yellow marigolds, and old-fashioned sweet, straying things, -- all growing together in a tangle of which my friend seemed ashamed. She told me that it looked as ordered as could be, until the things begun to grow so fast she couldn't do any thing with 'em. She was very proud of one little pink-and-white verbena which somebody had given her. It was not growing very well; but it had not disappointed her about blooming.

      Lovely lines, contain aspects of visual imagery and scents that these different flowers bring-- smells like summer. Also makes me think on the ways in which Jewett may be comparing women to flowers and how one might cultivate the growth of a child.

    1. When we disclose certain private things about ourselves, we increase the potential intimacythat we can have with another person, however, we also make ourselves vulnerable to gettinghurt by the other person. What if they do not like what I have disclosed or react negatively?It can be a double-edged sword. Disclosing positive news from one’s day is a great opportunityfor a daily deposit if the response from the other person is positive. What constitutes a positiveresponse?

      By us disclosing certain parts of our lives we can get personal with someone without exposing our whole life to someone who may end up hurting us. l also think it hurts a relationship as we hide stuff and the fact that we feel as though we can't share everything in our life with our partner.

    1. What if we design our games to be more socially meaningful?

      Even better; Why don't we design our social networks to be more socially meaningful? But first we need to consider deconstruction and re-engineering them as robust against the predatory environment of corporate and political exploitation.

      There is sooooo much going wanting in the areas of privacy, autonomy anti-fragility and economic rationalization and yes... user relevance and psycho/socio-ergonomics would fall into line in and around all that, but I do wish we could see the priority of undermining the existing tyranny of greed and power requires restructuring and winding back the entrenched dependencies on existing infrastructure and modalities. Walled gardens, phishing scams, Non-hierarchical network topology held captive and dependent upon on DNS and such hierarchical protocols and network topologies. Websites are forever usurping desktops and re-inventing the center and now apps all vying to be the new centrist portal/platform and gateway to corner a market if not a monopoly.

      If these fundamentals are not addressed there seems little point in meddling with top down procedural micro-management strategies designed to preempt the behavioral dynamics of players and bloat the front end interface codebase with more to manage in the eminent transition. I think we are over due for universal back-end overhaul and time to dial back the development of interface and the codebases of existing infrastructure dependency is somewhere from imminent to well over due.

      There may be many futile efforts put into redundancies far too late in the day. Cutting of losses and looking for the efficiency in fundamentals, may call for broad depreciation of 'legacy' code still in service. A couple to a few years down the track the dawning of a new paradigm will reward us and pay back our sacrifice.

      Having said that, I do actually like these ideas and not just for the game environment but for the plethora of dis jointed incompatible social apps/networks that avoid cross pollination and standardization of integration (compatibility/interoperability/profile-portability) and devour user contribution and conscription of their extended contact base as a commodity to exploit them with, rather than a commodity they should be rewarded for providing the platform.

      Open platforms of interoperable networking could be made to usurp the walled garden or to force them to segregate their platform and account code from the profile/user data base which they could hold in an encrypted and non-permanent form. Revoke their key and destroy their record of the user profile. Now they will play as responsible competitive providers for independent users with rewards to trade/revoke conditional. Now all these transaction provisions to describe the environment become relevant to the developers and the need to be feature and compatibility relevant cross-platform and retain profile agnostic interoperability, would drive an arms race in this customer centrist marketplace and a social experience of true value might rise from the source that matters.

    1. the self may be seen as a social actor, who enacts roles and displays traits by performing behaviors in the presence of others. Second,

      I feel like this is somewhat related to what most of us said in reference to inner and outer self. We enact different roles and behaviors depending on who we're with and how comfortable we are with that person. In the presence of others, I feel like we all have some social morals and behaviors we all uphold which I think what this idea is trying to say.

    2. the self may be seen as a social actor, who enacts roles and displays traits by performing behaviors in the presence of others.

      I find this very intreguing because although someone may be putting on a persona in the presence of others, it very rarely is intentional. Our bodies and minds snap into a certain act when we encounter situations and immediately react in whatever way we think will protect us the best. If its a group of mean girls the best form of protection is to put on a fake nice act and comply with what they say. With someone in a position of power people will adjust their disposition to be more submissive.

    1. When it happens: Have you ever felt proud of yourself for bringing lunch from home all week and then gone out for expensive meals over the weekend? What about working out in the morning only to binge on late-night snacks?The progress bias explains our tendency to overestimate the effects of our positive or goal-supportive actions (like exercising) and underestimate the effects of negative actions (like eating poorly), which can lead to making poor choices as we think we’re in a better position than we are.

      I understood that eating home made food during the weekdays and going out to eat on weekends doesn't benefit you much. As the author said It's like working out in the morning and binge on late-night snacks, sure it may save some money but in longer run it doesn't benefits you much.

    1. Communication technology, social media, electronic parenting, and many otherrecent technological advances may reduce social behaviors

      It’s very common in today’s society to see everyone sitting in a room on their phones. Even if two people are having a conversation, if there’s an awkward silence automatically someone will grab out their phone. I think this generation and younger generations are finding it harder and harder to communicate with others face to face, and that could be a possible reason as to why so many young people suffer from loneliness and depression. Even though we can sit on our phones and text or message multiple people, there is still a lack of connection that you can get from talking to someone face to face.

    1. "We have to start changing the climate of schools," Mr. Rose said, "and when we change the climate of schools, it takes time."

      Even though it may take a long time to change school climates and the ways we view those different than us, I absolutely think it's worth it. It's only natural to want a more immediate change, but I think it's going to take a lot of hard work and a lot of patient teachers, involved parents, and willing children to make the changes we need within our schools and society as a whole.I absolutely think it's possible that knowledge and compassion are the best ways to unite us all as people, no matter what our differences are.

    1. We are marching fast and steadily towards free trade. We must meet the views of the people of the Lower Provinces, who are hostile to high tariffs, and the demand of the Imperial authorities that we should not tax their manufactures so heavily as—in their phrase—almost to deprive them of our market. It was distinctly and officially stated the other day, in Newfoundland, that assurance had been given to the Government of Newfoundland that the views of the Canadian Government are unmistakably in this direction. And I do not think there is any mistake about that, either. To show how people at home, too, expect our tariff to come down, I may refer to the speech of Mr. HAMBURY TRACY, in seconding the Address in answer to the Speech from the Throne, in the House of Commons the other day. He could not stop, after saying generally that he was pleased with this Confederation movement, without adding that he trusted it would result in a very considerable decrease in the absurdly high and hostile tariff at present prevailing in Canada.

      §.121 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. Our point is that this perspective is itself an implicit valuation. Itis simply arguing that nature is more valuable than any possiblealternative. While in many cases this may be true, society hasmade decisions that imply it is not always the case (Russell-Smith et al., 2015). Every time we build homes, schools, and hospi-tals, which are essential for human wellbeing, we appropriateecosystems and impact our natural capital. Thus, being more expli-cit about the value of ES and NC can help society make better deci-sions in the many cases in which trade-offs exist

      Very important. If we do not make an effort to value ecosystems with the argument that nature should be always protected, What we are saying is that nature has a higher value than enything else. Even when this might sound convincing, obviously we as society or individuals do not think so: We built houses and hospitals with the agreement of everyone and the obvious consequence of running over nature.

    1. Convinced that reality has noinherent nature, which he might hope to identify as the truthabout things, he devotes himself to being true to his own nature.

      I don't buy this. I don't think most people have the time to be thinking about the nature of their reality or be solipsistic. It is a rather privileged position to be in to be able to spend one's time pondering about the social construction of reality.

      The author also fails to provide examples of what he means as "anti-realist" doctrines. So I am just speaking on my interpretation of his writing.

      In practice, perhaps what the author is talking about are those who believe in "alternative facts" are anti-realists. I think it takes a lot of time, education, intellectual engagement to b able to triangulate data, and be media literate -- i.e. privileged, in order to really have an 'objective' view on the world. While the author does state that objectivity may never be achieved but its a goal, he fails to consider what type of society/culture, education system, values, institutions, resources are needed to create a democracy of "informed" citizens.

      I think for many people in the world their sense of reality is based on patterns they see, socialization, personal experiences, in addition to appeals of authority, etc, So I think we should be more understanding of where and why anti-realist doctrines come from in social life

    2. His eyeis not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of theliar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest ingetting away with what he says

      Getting away with what he says or getting what he wants.

      I think there may be something here in the relationship of the parties. We wouldn't be able to "bullshit" someone who knew us well or intimately. That would be lying.

      Also, we would definitely try to bullshit our way through an interview or an exam essay, but would not lie. Unless we were stating an untrue opinion because we were afraid our true feelings would be judged negatively, which again comes back to the relationship question.

    3. think of him.

      Similar to mawaters comment above, I feel like there's a bit of a leap being taken here, while other rhetorical motives are being ignored. I'm not really buying the 'self-impression' motive. He may believe what he is saying, or he may not, but what does not change is the position from which he is speaking, and the audience he is speaking to. I feel as though there is definitely room in between those two objective points to recognize the humbuggery-- that being a statement and a motive which we cannot fully discern, yet one we are certain holds an ulterior agenda-- and to come up with a number of reasons as to the intentions of the orator.

    1. Everything is not provided for, because a great deal is trusted lo the common sense of the people. I think it is quite fair and safe to assert that there is not the slightest danger that the Federal Parliament will perpetrate any injustice upon the local legislatures, because it would cause such a reaction as to compass the destruction of the power thus unjustly exercised. The veto power is necessary in order that the General Government may have a control over the proceedings of the local legislatures to a certain extent. The want of this power was the great source of weakness in the United States, and it is a want that will be remedied by an amendment in their Constitution very soon. So long as each state considered itself sovereign, whose acts and laws could not be called in question, it was quite clear that the central authority was destitute of power to compel obedience to general laws. If each province were able to enact such laws as it pleased, everybody would be at the mercy of the local legislatures, and the General Legislature would become of little importance. It is contended that the power of the General Legislature should be held in check by a veto power with reference to its own territory, resident in the local legislatures, respecting the application of general laws to their jurisdiction. All power, they say, comes from the people and ascends through them to their representatives, and through the representatives to the Crown. But it would never do to set the Local above the General, Government. The Central Parliament and Government must, of necessity, exercise the supreme power, and the local governments will have the exercise of power corresponding to the duties they have to perform. The system is a new and untried one, and may not work so harmoniously as we now anticipate, but there will always but p ¡war in the British Parliament and our own to remedy any defects that may be discovered after the system is in operation. Altogether, I regard the scheme as a magnificent one, and I look forward to the future with anticipate- tins of seeing a country and a government possessing great power and respectability, and of being, before I die, a citizen of an immense empire built up on our part of the North American continent, where the folds of the British flag will float in triumph over a people possessing freedom, happiness and prosperity equal to the people of any other nation on the earth.

      §.90 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    2. And, besides that, we have provision made for extending the representation east or west, as occasion may require, according to the increase of our population shown at the decennial periods for taking the census. Any thing fairer than that could not possibly be demanded. And if Lower Canada increases more rapidly in population than Canada West, she will obtain representation accordingly. For, although the number of her members cannot be changed from sixty-five, the proportion of that number to the whole will be changed relatively to the progress of the various colonies. On the other hand if we extend, as I have no doubt we will do, westward, towards the centre of the continent, we will obtain a large population for our Confederation in the west. In that quarter we must look for the largest increase of our population in British America, and before many years elapse the centre of population and power will tend westward much farther than most people now think. The increase in the representation is therefore almost certain to be chiefly in the west, and every year will add to the influence and power of Western Canada, as well as to her trade and commerce. The most important question that arises relates to the constitution of the Upper House. It is said that in this particular the scheme is singularly defective—that there has been a retrograde movement in going back from the elective to the nominative system. I admit that this statement is a fair one from those who contended long for the application of the elective principle to the Upper House; but it can have no weight with another large class, who, like myself, never believed in the wisdom of electing the members of two Houses of Parliament with coordinate powers. I have always believed that a change from the present system was inevitable, even with our present political organization. (Hear, hear.) The constitution of an Upper House or Senate seems to have originated in the state of society which prevailed in feudal times ; and from being the sole legislative body—or at least the most powerful—in the State, it has imperceptibly become less powerful, or secondary in importance to the lower chamber, as the mass of the people became more intelligent, and popular rights became more fully understood. Where there is an Upper House it manifestly implies on the part of its members peculiar duties or peculiar rights. In Great Britain, for instance, there is a large class of landed proprietors, who have long held almost all the landed property of the country in their hands, and who have to pay an immense amount of taxes. The fiscal legislation of Britain for many years has tended to the reduction of impost and excise duties on articles of prime necessity, and to the imposition of heavy taxes on landed property and incomes. Under such a financial system, there are immense interests at stake, and the House of Lords being the highest judicial tribunal in the kingdom, there is a combination of peculiar rights and peculiar duties appertaining to the class represented which amply justify its maintenance. We have no such interests, and we-impose no such duties, and hence the Upper House becomes a mere court of revision, or one of coordinate jurisdiction ; as the latter it is not required ; to become the former, it should be constituted differently from the House of Assembly. The United States present the example of a community socially similar to ourselves,

      §§.24 and 51 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. “There’s worry that you can’t remove the plastic without removing marine life at the same time,” said George Leonard, chief scientist at the Ocean Conservancy. “We know from the fishing industry if you put any sort of structure in the open ocean, it acts as a fish-aggregating device.”

      This is a great risk they will have to take. I think if they work with marine biologists they may be able to find a solution that will be potentially less harmful to the wildlife.

    1. As I saw that they were very friendly to us, and perceived that they could be much more easily converted to our holy faith by gentle means than by force, I presented them with some red caps, and strings of beads to wear upon the neck, and many other trifles of small value, wherewith they were much delighted, and became wonderfully attached to us. Afterwards they came swimming to the boats, bringing parrots, balls of cotton thread, javelins, and many other things which they exchanged for articles we gave them, such as glass beads, and hawk’s bells; which trade was carried on with the utmost good will. But they seemed on the whole to me, to be a very poor people. They all go completely naked, even the women, though I saw but one girl. All whom I saw were young, not above thirty years of age, well made, with fine shapes and faces; their hair short, and coarse like that of a horse’s tail, combed toward the forehead, except a small portion which they suffer to hang down behind, and never cut. Some paint themselves with black, which makes them appear like those of the Canaries, neither black nor white; others with white, others with red, and others with such colors as they can find. Some paint the face, and some the whole body; others only the eyes, and others the nose. Weapons they have none, nor are acquainted with them, for I showed them swords which they grasped by the blades, and cut themselves through ignorance. They have no iron, their javelins being without it, and nothing more than sticks, though some have fish-bones or other things at the ends. They are all of a good size and stature, and handsomely formed. I saw some with scars of wounds upon their bodies, and demanded by signs the of them; they answered me in the same way, that there came people from the other islands in the neighborhood who endeavored to make prisoners of them, and they defended themselves. I thought then, and still believe, that these were from the continent. It appears to me, that the people are ingenious, and would be good servants and I am of opinion that they would very readily become Christians, as they appear to have no religion. They very quickly learn such words as are spoken to them. If it please our Lord, I intend at my return to carry home six of them to your Highnesses, that they may learn our language. I saw no beasts in the island, nor any sort of animals except parrots.” These are the words of the Admiral.

      First concern is whether a war will have to break out, but the Admiral sees this, finally, as a conversion opportunity.

      He then goes into detail, in the next passages, about the dress and customs of the Taíno people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta%C3%ADno

      With this stroke, indigenous history and customs is erased.

      I think it's important to keep in mind that this ideological work - suppressing the cultures of the native peoples - is just as necessary a part of the eventual conquest of the Caribbean and North and South America as the diseases and the military and economic might of the settling forces.

    1. This suggests that displacement of physical activity may not be a strong link between screen time and obesity.

      This was very interesting to read and I am going to have to say I disagree with this statement. Like stated in the article, there are difficulties when it comes to measuring screen media exposure and physical activity. Based off of experience such as babysitting, once the kids are glued in to a show or game, there is no way I am getting them to go outside. A 3 year old that I babysat threw a tantrum when I told him we were done watching TV and it was time to go on a walk. I think physical activity and screen time directly correlates with obesity.

    1. The first way you may think to use Wikipedia is as a source—that is, as a text you can quote or paraphrase in a paper.

      Schools I've been taught at never mentioned that you could do this. I like how this is challenging our perceptions over what is a good source. Just because our past teachers said it was not a good way to research, but now we are doing a complete 180 and now it is acceptable.

    1. "More availability means more usage and honestly, I don't think Utah voters … understand that this is really a whole new system of distribution," he said, leading to a major influx of dispensaries in a newly opened market. "We don't use Rite Aid, we don't use Walgreens." Plumb and the Utah Medical Association have each argued that giving patients marijuana through a dispensary is playing fast and loose with a potent substance, skipping the pharmaceutical safeguards required for the distribution of other drugs.

      In this passage, I feel that Plumb is trying to inflict fear into the community about a "new system of distribution." Creating separate dispensaries is not a bad thing and I believe he is blowing the issue out of proportion. Having a separate building may actually be safer for the community since the dispensaries in other states won't let anyone under the age of 21 walk in the door or without a licensed medical card. At Rite Aid and Walgreen's, everyone in the public is welcome inside no matter the age. There are no security guards or other precautionary measures taken to guard the prescriptions in these pharmacies. In these pharmacies there are far more addictive and life threatening drugs than marijuana. If anything, there needs to be tighter measures taken if at pharmacies if he is afraid of theft. If someone steals a bottle of Opioids form Walgreens, there is a good chance that the person could die, while if someone stole marijuana, there is no chance of causing death. Marijuana would not skip "pharmaceutical safeguards" as he claims. Other states test and monitor the plants to make sure they are clean and consumable. Marijuana, unlike the other medications, do not require chemicals and labs to produce the product. They require sunlight, soil and water, just like vegetables. He is trying to inflict doubt into something that is far safer than the prescription drugs pumped out of labs.

    1. Large computer networks (and their associated users) may “wake up” as superhumanly intelligent entities.

      The great "AI" has been around for a while now, we human are largely working on a computer machine to think for "itself". As fascinating as it sounds, aren't we just being lazy; depending on a robot to do the work for us. What will happen with the human race if these AI start producing more and better equipped AI. We have a brain that can produce so much if we just decide to do things on our own.

    1. So please do read the Code and Google’s values, and follow both in spirit and letter, always bearing in mind that each of us has a personal responsibility to incorporate, and to encourage other Googlers to incorporate, the principles of the Code and values into our work. And if you have a question or ever think that one of your fellow Googlers or the company as a whole may be falling short of our commitment, don’t be silent. We want – and need – to hear from you.

      Main purpose of the code of ethics. Everyone is included and everyone must be held to the standards that the company sets.

    1. This is unquestionably a grave and serious subject of consideration, and especially so to the minority in this section of the province, that is the English-speaking minority to which I and many other members of this House belong, and with whose interests we are identified. I do not disguise that I have heard very grave and serious apprehensions by many men for whose opinions I have great respect, and whom I admire for the absence of bigotry and narrow-mindedness which they have always exhibited. They have expressed themselves not so much in the way of objection to specific features of the scheme as in the way of apprehension of something dangerous to them in it— apprehensions which they cannot state explicitly or even define to themselves. They seem doubtful and distrustful as to the consequences, express fears as to how it will affect their future condition and interests, and in fact they almost think that in view of this uncertainty it would be better if we remained as we are. Now, sir, I believe that the rights of both minorities—the French minority in the General Legislature and the English-speaking minority in the Local Legislature of Lower Canada—are properly guarded. I would admit at once that without this protection it would be open to the gravest objection ; I would admit that you were embodying in it an element of future difficulty, a cause of future dissension and agitation that might be destructive to the whole fabric ; and therefore it is a very grave and anxious question for us to consider —especially the minorities in Lower Canada —how far our mutual rights and interests are respected and guarded, the one in the General and the other in the Local Legislature. With reference to this subject, I think that I , and those with whom I have acted—the English speaking members from Lower Canada—may in some degree congratulate ourselves at having brought about a state of feeling between the two races in this section of the province which has produced some good effect. (Hear, hear.)

      §.93 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    2. of the scheme, without which it would certainly, in my opinion, have been open to very serious objection. (Hear, hear.) I will not now criticize any other of the leading features of the resolutions as they touch the fundamental conditions and principles of the union. I think there has been throughout a most wise and statesmanlike distribution of powers, and at the same time that those things have been carefully guarded which the minorities in the various sections required for their protection, and the regulation of which each province was not unnaturally desirous of retaining for itself. So far then as the objection is concerned of this union being federative merely in its character, and liable to all the difficulties which usually surround federal governments, I think we may fairly consider that there has been a proper and satisfactory distribution of power, which will avert many of those difficulties. (Hear, hear.)

      §§.91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. There has been considerable concern that television may negatively influence young children’s executive function, especially the ability to focus and sustain attention in task situations.

      I feel like technology in general has positive and negative aspects just like anything else. I believe that it is important for children to have a balance with technology. I think I grew up at a nice time because I know how to use technology, but it was not as dominant. I played outside and created special bonds with people, but also got a Game Boy and electronics for birthdays and special occasions. I think society today is a lot more dependent on technology I know from high school until now I have became a lot more attached. I think moderation is the biggest thing we should focus on when it comes to technology.

    1. Professionally our methods of transmitting and reviewing the results of research are generations old and by now are totally inadequate for their purpose. If the aggregate time spent in writing scholarly works and in reading them could be evaluated, the ratio between these amounts of time might well be startling. Those who conscientiously attempt to keep abreast of current thought, even in restricted fields, by close and continuous reading might well shy away from an examination calculated to show how much of the previous month's efforts could be produced on call. Mendel's concept of the laws of genetics was lost to the world for a generation because his publication did not reach the few who were capable of grasping and extending it; and this sort of catastrophe is undoubtedly being repeated all about us, as truly significant attainments become lost in the mass of the inconsequential.

      The results of research that are finalized now are becoming outdated due to the fact that we continue to grow and have no purpose for that type of research.

    2. Certainly progress in photography is not going to stop. Faster material and lenses, more automatic cameras, finer-grained sensitive compounds to allow an extension of the minicamera idea, are all imminent.

      I find this quote very relatable to today's society because everyday new research and experiments are being conducted to improve technology in any way whether it's so make it faster, smaller, or more efficient. Technology is constantly growing and becoming a part of our daily lives.

    3. There is a growing mountain of research. But there is increased evidence that we are being bogged down today as specialization extends.

      This reminds me of how people say technology is making us more stupid, because it is becoming so advanced it does so much for us. It should stay simple and to the point.

    4. For years inventions have extended man's physical powers rather than the powers of his mind

      Inventions are created to make doing tasks easier, however, there is no technological supplement that could enhance brain power (e.g, a device to help you absorb information in studying for a test)

    5. For the biologists, and particularly for the medical scientists, there can be little indecision, for their war has hardly required them to leave the old paths. Many indeed have been able to carry on their war research in their familiar peacetime laboratories. Their objectives remain much the same.

      In the medical field, there is great repetition in terms of objective. There is more innovation coming out in the medical field, however, it remains associated with the same ideas of traditional medicine rather than new medical research. Medicine is a field that relies on old facts to create new discoveries. Functional medicine or holistic/alternative medicine is becoming more popular today.

    6. They have given him increased knowledge of his own biological processes so that he has had a progressive freedom from disease and an increased span of life. They are illuminating the interactions of his physiological and psychological functions, giving the promise of an improved mental health.

      Technology has given us great insight into our internal/mental well-being. With the technology of today we have more knowledge of how our body works to thereby increase one's lifespan and promote better quality of life. Technology betters not only the physical aspects of life (communication, education, etc.,) but also the intangible aspects (mental health).

    1. I’m going to assume most people in the room here have read Vannevar Bush’s 1945 essay As We May Think. If you haven’t read it yet, you need to.

      I seem to run across references to this every couple of months. Interestingly it is never in relation to information theory or Claude Shannon references which I somehow what I most closely relate it to.

    1. We have heard much about the proposed new constitution of the Legislative Council. We have been told it was political necessity that first forced the elective system of minds that were by no means enamoured of it, and this, I think, has been fully established. Now, it would ill become me, as an elected member, to dwell on any merits or excellences the elective system may have possessed as applied to this branch of the Legislature— it is a subject we can none of us touch upon with the same freedom which we might if we were not ourselves elected—but I may call the attention of the House to this, that none of the evils that were dreaded, as likely to flow from the elective system, have yet shown themselves, and I do not think it at all reasonable, much less necessary, that they should be anticipated in time to come. My own views were in perfect accord with those of hon. gentlemen who protested against the system when it was first introduced. I did not then consider it an improvement, and my views have not changed since ; I have, consequently, no personal predilections for an Elective Council, but far prefer a Chamber nominated by the Crown.

      §.24 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. And yes, we must be ready to receive their guidance as well.

      I like this, I think people may overlook the fact that there is a lot that can be learned from students too, not just adults/professors/elders

    1. Students who receive encouraging feedback from teachers may feel more personally efficacious and work harder to succeed

      I believe that this is extremely important to note as future teachers. At an early age, positive feedback is going to work much more effectively than anything else. My fourth grade teacher was very strict on what we could write about in our writing time. Other teachers allowed more creativity than mine did so I think that tarnished my view of writing as a whole when I was younger.

    1. Filthy Lucre' Is A Modern Remix Of The Peacock Room's Wretched Excess 'Filthy Lucre' Is A Modern Remix Of The Peacock Room's Wretched Excess Listen· 7:267:26Queue Toggle more options Download Embed Embed <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/408226983/408407242" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player"> Transcript Facebook Twitter Flipboard Email May 21, 20153:34 AM ET Heard on Morning Edition Susan Stamberg James McNeill Whistler lavishly decorated the Peacock Room — an actual London dining room — for shipping magnate Frederick Leyland in 1876. Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian hide caption toggle caption Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian An artist has just converted a legendary piece of 19th-century art into an utter ruin. And two Smithsonian institutions — the Freer and Sackler galleries of Asian art — have given their blessings. The Peacock Room at the Freer Gallery is an actual dining room from London, decorated by James McNeill Whistler in 1876. Its blue-green walls are covered with golden designs and painted peacocks. Gilded shelves hold priceless Asian ceramics. It's an expensive, lavish cocoon, rich in beauty with a dab of menace. Freer security guard Shaquan Harper spends hours at a time in the Peacock Room — and says it's a peaceful, meditative experience. "Blue is my favorite color, and whenever I wear jewelry it's gold," he says. "So I kind of make a personal connection with the room. This is one of my favorite galleries in the Smithsonian." "Even though it's a room, it's really a six-sided painting that you literally walk into. ... You have no sense whatsoever of the outside world. It's a world in which art has completely overtaken life." Curator Lee Glazer Curator Lee Glazer agrees that the Peacock Room is a completely immersive experience. "Even though it's a room, it's really a six-sided painting that you literally walk into," she says. The Peacock Room is a gorgeous, gilded cage. "You have no sense whatsoever of the outside world," says Glazer. "It's a world in which art has completely overtaken life." It was shipping magnate Frederick Leyland's world. It was created in the Victorian era when self-made men with new fortunes were buying their way into British society through fine houses and important works of art. Whistler paints his wealthy patron as a golden peacock, at one end of the dining room. Nearby, another peacock — representing the "poor" artist. "They're actually in a face-off," Glazer says. Article continues after sponsorship Fighting, for reasons to be revealed in a bit. It's a dispute about art and money — although Whistler named the room Harmony in Blue and Gold. Next door, in the Sackler Museum of Asian Art, painter Darren Waterston has reproduced and re-interpreted Whistler's dining room in an installation called Filthy Lucre — which means "dirty money." This "Peacock Room Remix" looks as if a wrecking ball has been slammed into Whistler's work. The priceless Asian vases in the original are smashed — their shards litter the floor. "The shelves are all broken," Waterston says. "The gold gild is either melting off or puddling on the floor." Enlarge this image In Darren Waterston's Filthy Lucre it looks as if a wrecking ball has been slammed into Whistler's lavish work. Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery hide caption toggle caption Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery In Darren Waterston's Filthy Lucre it looks as if a wrecking ball has been slammed into Whistler's lavish work. Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery The original room feels claustrophobic in its excess. The remix feels scary as if there's been an earthquake and another tremor is coming any minute. "There's a sense of danger," says Waterston. He seems cheerful and sweet, but don't be fooled: "My work absolutely has a perversity," he says. "There's always an underbelly to it." Enlarge this image Shards of smashed Asian vases litter the floor of Waterston's Filthy Lucre. Amber Gray/Freer Sackler Gallery hide caption toggle caption Amber Gray/Freer Sackler Gallery Shards of smashed Asian vases litter the floor of Waterston's Filthy Lucre. Amber Gray/Freer Sackler Gallery Here, Waterston says he wanted to show the volatility of beauty. The big, cancerous, gilded cysts he's blobbed onto Whistler's reproduced golden shelves, the spilled paint oozing onto the rug — these are his reactions to what's happening between art and money these days. "This is what it means to be a living artist in this contemporary art world," Waterston says. "It is so filled with excess and this incredible consumption, this insatiable consumption of the object and of aesthetics." The most vivid, even yuck-making example is what Waterston's done to Whistler's two golden peacocks; in this remix, the birds aren't just fighting, they're eviscerating each other. They're "literally disemboweling each other," he describes. "One has the other's entrails being pulled out — talons are out." The golden peacocks in Filthy Lucre are "literally disemboweling each other," Waterston says. Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery hide caption toggle caption Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery They hate each other's guts! Which is exactly what happened between Whistler and Leyland. The patron asked the artist to just make some modest adjustments in his new dining room. Glazer says Whistler put a few wavy dabs of gold paint here, some metal color there, "and everyone was very happy with that." Leyland and his family left London for the summer. And that, Glazer says, is when Whistler's imagination took flight. He transformed the room, covering every surface with blue and gold paint. He worked like a madman. "Whistler talks about being up on the scaffolding at 6 in the morning and not coming down until 9 at night," says Glazer. " 'I'm blind with sleep and blue peacock feathers,' he says." He kept his friend and patron more or less informed about what he was doing: "All through the summer Leyland received letters from Whistler talking about the gorgeous surprise that Whistler was preparing for him and the family," Glazer explains. Well, Leyland comes home, sees the extent of work — and the 2,000 pounds that Whistler wanted to be paid for it (about a quarter of a million dollars today) — and, as they used to say in Victorian days: Leyland blew a gasket. In the middle of the dispute, with Leyland paying half of what Whistler requested, the artist went back to the dining room to finish up. "And that was really when he exacted his vengeance," says Glazer. Enlarge this image James McNeill Whistler's mother — immortalized in his 1871 painting Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1: Portrait of the Artist's Mother — worried about all the time and energy her son was pouring into the Peacock Room. "A gentleman's house isn't an exhibition," she told him. Detroit Institute of Arts via Getty Images hide caption toggle caption Detroit Institute of Arts via Getty Images James McNeill Whistler's mother — immortalized in his 1871 painting Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1: Portrait of the Artist's Mother — worried about all the time and energy her son was pouring into the Peacock Room. "A gentleman's house isn't an exhibition," she told him. Detroit Institute of Arts via Getty Images He painted those fighting peacocks — the just-plain-angry ones, not Waterston's gut-wrenching birds — and laid on even more blue paint. Then Whistler left, and never saw the Peacock Room again. Now, we can't end this story without talking about Whistler's mother — that iconic profiled figure in gray and black. What did Mama Whistler think of the whole thing — the frenzied work, the manic effort? Glazer reports that Anna Whistler was worried about her son; she thought he was working too hard, not eating, not sleeping: "She chides him about that and says, 'You know, Jimmy, a gentleman's house isn't an exhibition' — meaning: Get out there and make some money and make some things that are going to sell," says Glazer. "And so, always listening to his mother — Whistler was kind of a Momma's boy — he did invite the press in to watch him work in the Peacock Room." Yet another thing he forgot to tell Frederick Leyland! The results of this delicious dispute can be seen on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. — at the Freer, site of the original Peacock Room, and the Sackler, where Filthy Lucre, Darren Waterston's remix, is on display until January 2017.

      The struggle of an artist who is aprreciated by the audience but not able to recive the amount that is supposedly what must come after as a reward. The article also tells the corruption and no exchange of artist from the buyers.

    2. 'Filthy Lucre' Is A Modern Remix Of The Peacock Room's Wretched Excess 'Filthy Lucre' Is A Modern Remix Of The Peacock Room's Wretched Excess Listen· 7:267:26Queue Toggle more options Download Embed Embed <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/408226983/408407242" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player"> Transcript Facebook Twitter Flipboard Email May 21, 20153:34 AM ET Heard on Morning Edition Susan Stamberg James McNeill Whistler lavishly decorated the Peacock Room — an actual London dining room — for shipping magnate Frederick Leyland in 1876. Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian hide caption toggle caption Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian An artist has just converted a legendary piece of 19th-century art into an utter ruin. And two Smithsonian institutions — the Freer and Sackler galleries of Asian art — have given their blessings. The Peacock Room at the Freer Gallery is an actual dining room from London, decorated by James McNeill Whistler in 1876. Its blue-green walls are covered with golden designs and painted peacocks. Gilded shelves hold priceless Asian ceramics. It's an expensive, lavish cocoon, rich in beauty with a dab of menace. Freer security guard Shaquan Harper spends hours at a time in the Peacock Room — and says it's a peaceful, meditative experience. "Blue is my favorite color, and whenever I wear jewelry it's gold," he says. "So I kind of make a personal connection with the room. This is one of my favorite galleries in the Smithsonian." "Even though it's a room, it's really a six-sided painting that you literally walk into. ... You have no sense whatsoever of the outside world. It's a world in which art has completely overtaken life." Curator Lee Glazer Curator Lee Glazer agrees that the Peacock Room is a completely immersive experience. "Even though it's a room, it's really a six-sided painting that you literally walk into," she says. The Peacock Room is a gorgeous, gilded cage. "You have no sense whatsoever of the outside world," says Glazer. "It's a world in which art has completely overtaken life." It was shipping magnate Frederick Leyland's world. It was created in the Victorian era when self-made men with new fortunes were buying their way into British society through fine houses and important works of art. Whistler paints his wealthy patron as a golden peacock, at one end of the dining room. Nearby, another peacock — representing the "poor" artist. "They're actually in a face-off," Glazer says. Article continues after sponsorship Fighting, for reasons to be revealed in a bit. It's a dispute about art and money — although Whistler named the room Harmony in Blue and Gold. Next door, in the Sackler Museum of Asian Art, painter Darren Waterston has reproduced and re-interpreted Whistler's dining room in an installation called Filthy Lucre — which means "dirty money." This "Peacock Room Remix" looks as if a wrecking ball has been slammed into Whistler's work. The priceless Asian vases in the original are smashed — their shards litter the floor. "The shelves are all broken," Waterston says. "The gold gild is either melting off or puddling on the floor." Enlarge this image In Darren Waterston's Filthy Lucre it looks as if a wrecking ball has been slammed into Whistler's lavish work. Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery hide caption toggle caption Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery In Darren Waterston's Filthy Lucre it looks as if a wrecking ball has been slammed into Whistler's lavish work. Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery The original room feels claustrophobic in its excess. The remix feels scary as if there's been an earthquake and another tremor is coming any minute. "There's a sense of danger," says Waterston. He seems cheerful and sweet, but don't be fooled: "My work absolutely has a perversity," he says. "There's always an underbelly to it." Enlarge this image Shards of smashed Asian vases litter the floor of Waterston's Filthy Lucre. Amber Gray/Freer Sackler Gallery hide caption toggle caption Amber Gray/Freer Sackler Gallery Shards of smashed Asian vases litter the floor of Waterston's Filthy Lucre. Amber Gray/Freer Sackler Gallery Here, Waterston says he wanted to show the volatility of beauty. The big, cancerous, gilded cysts he's blobbed onto Whistler's reproduced golden shelves, the spilled paint oozing onto the rug — these are his reactions to what's happening between art and money these days. "This is what it means to be a living artist in this contemporary art world," Waterston says. "It is so filled with excess and this incredible consumption, this insatiable consumption of the object and of aesthetics." The most vivid, even yuck-making example is what Waterston's done to Whistler's two golden peacocks; in this remix, the birds aren't just fighting, they're eviscerating each other. They're "literally disemboweling each other," he describes. "One has the other's entrails being pulled out — talons are out." The golden peacocks in Filthy Lucre are "literally disemboweling each other," Waterston says. Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery hide caption toggle caption Hutomo Wicaksono/Freer Sackler Gallery They hate each other's guts! Which is exactly what happened between Whistler and Leyland. The patron asked the artist to just make some modest adjustments in his new dining room. Glazer says Whistler put a few wavy dabs of gold paint here, some metal color there, "and everyone was very happy with that." Leyland and his family left London for the summer. And that, Glazer says, is when Whistler's imagination took flight. He transformed the room, covering every surface with blue and gold paint. He worked like a madman. "Whistler talks about being up on the scaffolding at 6 in the morning and not coming down until 9 at night," says Glazer. " 'I'm blind with sleep and blue peacock feathers,' he says." He kept his friend and patron more or less informed about what he was doing: "All through the summer Leyland received letters from Whistler talking about the gorgeous surprise that Whistler was preparing for him and the family," Glazer explains. Well, Leyland comes home, sees the extent of work — and the 2,000 pounds that Whistler wanted to be paid for it (about a quarter of a million dollars today) — and, as they used to say in Victorian days: Leyland blew a gasket. In the middle of the dispute, with Leyland paying half of what Whistler requested, the artist went back to the dining room to finish up. "And that was really when he exacted his vengeance," says Glazer. Enlarge this image James McNeill Whistler's mother — immortalized in his 1871 painting Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1: Portrait of the Artist's Mother — worried about all the time and energy her son was pouring into the Peacock Room. "A gentleman's house isn't an exhibition," she told him. Detroit Institute of Arts via Getty Images hide caption toggle caption Detroit Institute of Arts via Getty Images James McNeill Whistler's mother — immortalized in his 1871 painting Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1: Portrait of the Artist's Mother — worried about all the time and energy her son was pouring into the Peacock Room. "A gentleman's house isn't an exhibition," she told him. Detroit Institute of Arts via Getty Images He painted those fighting peacocks — the just-plain-angry ones, not Waterston's gut-wrenching birds — and laid on even more blue paint. Then Whistler left, and never saw the Peacock Room again. Now, we can't end this story without talking about Whistler's mother — that iconic profiled figure in gray and black. What did Mama Whistler think of the whole thing — the frenzied work, the manic effort? Glazer reports that Anna Whistler was worried about her son; she thought he was working too hard, not eating, not sleeping: "She chides him about that and says, 'You know, Jimmy, a gentleman's house isn't an exhibition' — meaning: Get out there and make some money and make some things that are going to sell," says Glazer. "And so, always listening to his mother — Whistler was kind of a Momma's boy — he did invite the press in to watch him work in the Peacock Room." Yet another thing he forgot to tell Frederick Leyland! The results of this delicious dispute can be seen on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. — at the Freer, site of the original Peacock Room, and the Sackler, where Filthy Lucre, Darren Waterston's remix, is on display until January 2017.

      Filthy Lucre composes of fragments from the original Peacock room and overall of the article it explains not the comparison but the interpretation of why Filthy Lucre is as it is in addition to extra research.

    1. The elective principle, kept within proper bounds, is very good indeed, and hitherto, no doubt, has worked well in this House. But I doubt whether, in the course of time, this House would not lose its present high status if the elective principle was continued in it for ever. As regards this, however, I merely state my own opinion, and other honorable gentlemen may hold contrary opinions, as they are perfectly entitled to do. (Hear, hear.) Having thus, honorable gentlemen, explained the reasons which induced the Government, m 1856, to propose that the elective principle should be extended to this House, with the concomitant circumstances which assisted in bringing that about—and having also explained the reasons which have induced the Government now to look for another state of political existence, as we may call it, by Confederation with the Maritime Provinces, I think I am clear from any imputation of inconsistency or levity of purpose.

      §.24 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    2. I think that the engrafting of this system of government upon the British Constitution has a tendency to at least introduce the republican system. It is republican so far as it goes, and that is another reason why I do not approve of it. If we commence to adopt the republican system, we shall perhaps get the idea of continuing the system until we go too far. I t is also said that we are to have a new nationality. I do not understand that term, honorable gentlemen. If we were going to have an independent sovereignty in this country, then I could understand it. I believe honorable gentlemen will agree with me, that after this scheme is fully carried into operation, we shall still be colonies. HON. SIR E. P. TACHÉ—Of course. HON. MR. MOORE—NOW, that being the case, I think our Local Government will be placed in a lower position than in the Government we have now. Every measure resolved upon in the Local Government will be subject to the veto of the Federal Government—that is, any measure or bill passing the Local Legislature may be disallowed within one year by the Federal Government. HON. SIR E. P. TACHÉ—That is the case at present as between Canada and the Imperial Government. HON. MR. MOORE—I beg to differ slightly with the honorable gentleman. Any measure passed by this province may be disallowed within two years thereafter by the Imperial Government. But the local governments, under Confederation, are to be subjected to having their measures vetoed within one year by the Federal Government, and then the Imperial Government has the privilege of vetoing anything the Federal Government may do, within two years. The veto power thus placed in the hands of the Federal Government, if exercised frequently, would be almost certain to cause difficulty between the local and general governments. I observe that my honorable friend, Sir ETIENNE P. TACHÉ, does not approbate that remark. HON. SIR E. P. TACHÉ—You understand me correctly.

      Preamble and §.90 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. It envisioned a 1km stretch of dual carriageway between Salford University and Manchester city centre as a 4-lane linear Park. One lane is grassed, another a water channel, another sand and the last a running track. Commuters leave their cars in a multi-storey Car (P)Ark. The interchange also incorporates a suburban train station, cycle docking station, stables, and a boathouse and changing rooms. From the Car (P)Ark commuters head east into Manchester walking, jogging, cycling, rollerblading, horse riding, swimming or rowing. The Park terminates at a Suit Park where commuters can shower, change and get a coffee. (The word “suit” refers to the business suit). Eight hours later, on their way home, commuters deposit their clothes and return through the Park, to the interchange to collect their car or catch a train. The scheme could be extended to each of the radial routes into Manchester and at intervals these Parks could link, completing a comprehensive green commuter infrastructure. Save this picture! The Park + Jog proposal, 1998. Image Courtesy of Henley Halebrown Rorrison Architects Save this picture! Rendering of the Park + Jog proposal, 1998. Image Courtesy of Henley Halebrown Rorrison Architects What is striking about these parks is the positive impact they can have on their surrounding neighbourhoods, particularly when one considers the alternative. With roads, be it a dual carriageway or a street, comes heavy traffic, noise and pollution, at the expense of those who live and work around it. In the case of a High Street we forego certain types of shops, cafés and restaurants that engender a street life. At the scale of the dual-carriageway the A40 that tears through west London illustrates beautifully how dramatic the blight on homes can be, as this Mid-20th Century residential avenue has been transformed into a slum wrapped around a congested commuter road. These zones lack the 'density' of the city centre and the space of the suburb. And, each successive wave of Greenfield development adds to the expanse of this grey space.Active transportation routes and linear parks, on the other hand, regenerate their surroundings, bringing activity and value to blighted sections of the city. They also radically alter the political situation for the suburb and its inevitable commute. Of course, the creation of these green networks need not be at the expense of the motorist. On the 10th July London’s Transport Commissioner Peter Hendy launched a study for London that envisaged burying sections of the North and South Circular ring roads, and stretches of road close to the Thames. The initiative would create linear parks overhead, much as the Big Dig did for Boston. Save this picture! The Olympic Sculpture Park in Seattle, Washington, designed by Weiss Manfredi. Image © Benjamin Benschneider Although originally conceived for Manchester, I believe that Park+Jog may be adapted to any city worldwide and serve as an example for how Cycle Space could lay the ideological foundation to change our cities for the better. Combining new transportation methods that encourage the principles of a healthy life style with traditional roads can raise land values, attract investment and activate the urban environment. The social revolution that Bazalgette offered London in the 19th Century, Cycle Space might just bring to London and our world’s cities in the 21st. Simon Henley is a teacher, author of the well-received book The Architecture of Parking, and co-founder of London-based studio Henley Halebrown Rorrison (HHbR). His column, London Calling, looks at London’s every-day reality, its architectural culture, and its role as a global architectural hub; above all, it will explore how London is influencing design everywhere, whilst being forever challenged from within. You can follow him @SiHenleyHHbR and be a fan of his Facebook page, HHbR Architecture.Further Reading Park+JogLondon’s answer to Boston’s Big DigRogers 80th Birthday retrospective at the Royal AcademyThe Lidoline, YN Studio's "Swim to Work" Proposal AIA Presents 2013 Educational Facility Design Excellence Awards Architecture News Tretyakov Gallery Competition Entry / PAPER | TOTEMENT Unbuilt Project Save this article Share in Whatsapp About this author Simon Henley Author Follow See more: News Articles London CallingLondonBicyclingUrban Planning Cite: Simon Henley. "Why Cycle Cities Are the Future" 06 Aug 2013. ArchDaily. Accessed 3 Sep 2018. <https://www.archdaily.com/409556/why-cycle-cities-are-the-future/> ISSN 0719-8884 Read comments Browse the Catalog Ceramic Sunscreen - ALPHATUBE® Shildan Danpalon 3DLITE - Solar Control Danpal Elevator in Round Stairs Brembo Ascensori - The Elevator Company Upholstery Fastening System - Textile Range Fastmount® Frameless Sliding Doors - Sky-Frame Plain Sky-Frame Stainless Steel Bollards Reliance Foundry Please enable JavaScript to view the <a href='http://disqus.com/?ref_noscript'>comments powered by Disqus.</a> › 世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本! 想浏览ArchDaily中国吗? 是 否 翻译成中文 现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗? Take me there » Recommended for you Hawkins\Brown's London Pride Float Celebrates the "Dual Identities" of LGBT+ Architects Bicycle Club / NL Architects 10 Points of a Bicycling Architecture London Skyline Debate Taken to City Hall More Articles Could You Live in 15 Square Meters of Space? SUMATORIA's 'Tiny Home' May Make You Think Twice 17 Spectacular Living Roofs in Detail What it Means to Build Without Bias: Questioning the Role of Gender in Architecture More Articles » most visited 22 of the World’s Greatest Architecture Projects Selected by Time Magazine Dragons, Rocks, and Sails Inspire Sceno Light's Floating Theater in Vietnam's Ha Long Bay New Concrete House / Wespi de Meuron Most visited products Structural wood boards in Freiland-Hof Home | EGGER WEBNET Stainless Steel Frames | Jakob Siding Façade System | Technowood

      This shows that the architect has a clear plan for the bicycle sharing plan.

    1. had the right of making selections from all over the country. If that had been proposed, I think many honorable gentlemen would have found fault with it. (Hear, hear.) It was due to courtesy that the members of this House should not be overlooked, and not only that, but there were acquired rights which had to be respected. My honorable friend appears to dissent from this statement. Well, the last choice of the people are now in this House, and by the fact of their election they have acquired a right to a seat ; and I think those gentlemen who have been appointed for life have gained rights which should not be overlooked. (Hear, hear.) HON. MR. CURRIE—The honorable and gallant gentleman says we have an acquired right. I admit we have a right to sit here during the term for which we have been elected ; but what right have we to seat ourselves here for the remainder of our lives ? The people did not send us here to make this change in the composition of this House. (Hear, hear.) And what right even have the appointed members of this House to seats here during their lifetime? I have a despatch here, written by the late Duke of NEWCASTLE, who will be considered pretty good authority upon the point, to the Lieutenant-Governor of Prince Edward Island, on this very question. I need not read the words of the despatch, but the sense of it is, that legislative councillors have no right of property in their position, but simply a naked trust which the Legislature may at any time call upon them to surrender to other hands, if, in their opinion, the public interest shall require such transfer. HON. SIR E. P. TACHÉ—That is merely a matter of opinion. That may for a time have been the view of the Imperial authorities, but previous to 1856 they held and said directly the contrary. (Hear, hear.) They then said that they had granted certain privileges to certain gentlemen for life, and that they would not commit the injustice of withdrawing those privileges when the gentlemen had done nothing to forfeit them. (Hear, hear.) HON. MR. CURRIE—I am surprised at the honorable and gallant Premier questioning the ability of the distinguished gentleman who wrote the despatch to which I have just referred. Whatever may have been the opinion of the Colonial Office in 1856, this is a later opinion, for the despatch is dated the 4th of February, 1862, The honorable and gallant gentleman says they do not propose to take from any honorable gentleman the rights he now enjoys. I could understand this argument if they did not propose to take away the rights of any honorable member of this House ; but I cannot understand it when you propose to drive from this House faithful subjects who have served their country honestly in the Legislature, and I am afraid we have not yet had from the gallant Premier that explanation to which the House is entitled. (Hear, hear.) Why is it that the legislative councillors from Prince Edward Island are excepted ? In that province, as we know, the Legislative Council is elective, and it is an elected Chamber that is now in existence there, but the members of it are excepted from the provisions that apply to the legislative councils of the other provinces. Why is this ? I think there must be some reason, in the first place, for breaking the good rule that in no way shall the prerogative of the Crown be restricted ; and, in the second, for making an exception in regard to one that does not apply to the others. I think a reason may be found for this in the fact, that it was doubted whether the resolutions in a different shape would have passed through some of the chambers that compose the legislatures of the different provinces. (Hear, hear.) I would like to know what justice will be done if this change is carried out ? What, for instance, will be done with regard to two honorable members who come from the city of Hamilton ? One of them (the Hon. Mr. MILLS) is an appointed member ; the other (the Hon. Mr. BULL) was the almost unanimous choice of the people only a few months since. Under the working of the resolutions, one of these honorable gentlemen will forfeit his seat. HON. MR. ROSS—Why ? (Hear, hear.) HON. MR. CURRIE—If it does not follow that one of these honorable gentlemen will lose his seat, it must follow that some other portion of Upper Canada will be unrepresented in this House. (Hear, hear.) Let honorable gentlemen take either horn of the dilemma they please. It may be quite true that the gentlemen who have been sent here possess the confidence of their constituents, but it does not follow that they will be retained in their seats. It is plain that a great injustice will be done these honorable gentlemen, some of whom have served their country faithfully, without, in any way trenching upon the rights of the Crown or infringing on those of the people; and I think the conclusion this House and the country, as well as the other branch of the Legislature, will arrive at, is that those re-

      §§.24, 25 and 146 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. Teachers not only like attractive childrenbetter but also perceive them as less likely tomisbehave, more intelligent, and even morelikely to get advanced degrees.

      This statement is surprising to me! I feel like this is a classic example that can apply to the saying mentioned above as, "Don't judge a book by it's cover." Out of all the members in society, i would not think teachers would judge their student's potential by their attractiveness. That honestly seems pretty biased and unethical. The attractive students may catch their eye (not in a creepy way), but to perceive them as more troublesome behaviorally, more intelligent, or more successful is uncalled for in my opinion. Every child should be treated the same in regards to their education. But, we all know that hardly ever happens. It is what is right though.

  7. Aug 2018
    1. Design history has long overlooked women in our narrative, despite continuously having a large group of women active in the field of graphic design over the past century. Lucinda Hitchcock is a professor in Graphic Design at the Rhode Island School of Design, as well as a member of the Design Office in Providence, Rhode Island. “For me, it has to do with the imbalance of genders in the educational environment and in the framework of the design history that is being taught,” Hitchcock explains. Careful to point out it may not be the same situation in all design schools, Hitchcock adds, “Why does design history still teach about male designers 80% more than women designers? Why do we have 80 % women in the student body (in our [RISD] department) and 80% men in the faculty?”

      i think it is strange that female students is more than male but designer male are more than female. i have many female designer tutor in my school, and i know a lot of famous female designer. i think this issue is better than before

    2. Forty or fifty years ago, the workforce was overwhelmingly a man’s world. In the design field, many women may have been assistants or “office girls” and so few held the top titles, such as art director or creative director. In a basic sense, women’s careers have rarely followed the same path of men’s, since there has historically been immense pressure placed on women to be solely homemakers and nurture families (see: Beyond The Glass Ceiling: an open discussion, Astrid Stavro, Elephant #6) with more sinister pressures of socially-accepted sexism and segregation discouraging, or even disqualifying, the career ambitions of capable women.

      Because of social issue, female suffer the unfair treatment, i think it is a loss of design development. because female designer has many different idea with male designer. Design should be variety and creative. it should not limited by gender.

    3. As discussed earlier, the US design profession is not predominantly male— just over half of the profession is female— yet with celebrity designers so often male, the representation is primarily male. In “Type Persons Who Happen to be Female” Susanne Dechant explains that despite many typographic achievements, women remained underrepresented at type conferences. “TypoBerlin (2009: 5% female presenters) or Atypl (2009: 12%), as well as in various type foundries (Linotype 2005: 12.3%; Myfonts.com 2008: 14%). Today an equal number of women and men are studying type design—so we can expect or at least hope for a levelling of the playing field.”

      Discrimination happens in both genders and not only women (from what a person may think when they first read the article.)

    1. But almost all arguments about student privacy, whether those calling for more restrictions or fewer, fail to give students themselves a voice, let alone some assistance in deciding what to share online.

      I think students' voices need to be heard since they have grown up with technology their whole lives. They are being represented by adults who may or may not use technology as frequently and have definitely not grown up from a young age with the advanced technology there is today.

  8. instructure-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com instructure-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com
    1. learningasasocialundertakingandaccomplishmentshapedbypolitical,cultural,historicalandeconomiccontexts

      I am especially interested in this aspect of the class, as we consider intersectionality, and the inability of untangling social systems of oppression - I think solutions may lie in finding where they tangle.

    1. HON. MR. MCCREA—Does the honorable member from Grandville not remember the increase of members in the representation of the other House, in 1853, and the amendment of the constitution of this House in 1856, the very question I am now debating ? Surely these measures were amendments of that act, and who knows but under the new Constitutional Act—the favorite measure of my honorable friend—the election of members of this House, may not again be resorted to, if the nominative principle shall not be found to work well ? But let us examine for a moment what the amendment of my honorable friend from Wellington is intended to effect. It will be seen by referring to the amendment itself, that the honorable gentleman proposes that the members of this House from Canada and from the Maritime Provinces shall have a different origin or, as it were, a different parentage, elected by the people with us, and appointed by the Crown from the eastern provinces. I take it that it is very desirable that in whatever way the members of this House may be chosen, there should be uniformity in the system. By the honorable gentleman’s plan we shall have one-third of the members from below representing the Crown, and two-thirds from above, representing the people ; a curious sort of incongruity which I think should by all means be avoided. I may be answered that our present House is constituted in that very way ; but honorable gentlemen must remember that the life member» are not the sole representatives of any particular section of the province, but are chosen indiscriminately from all parts of the province. This is not likely to lead to a sectional collision like the scheme of my honorable friend, and be sides that, the appointment of life members in this House is not to be continued after the seats of the present members shall have become vacant from any cause whatever. I think the scheme of my honorable friend the most objectionable of all.

      §.24 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    2. HON. MR. REESOR—Well, there it is. The honorable gentleman acknowledges his determination to reward his political supporters. Is this the way to obtain an independent branch of the Legislature, one that will operate as a wholesome check on hasty legislation? Those who receive favors from a political party are not likely to turn their backs upon that party. I think we are not likely, under any circumstances, to have a more independent House under the proposed system than we now have, or one which will better advance the interests of the country. If you wish to raise the elective franchise, for elections to the Upper House—if you would confine their election to voters on real estate of $400 assessed value, and tenants holding a lease-hold of $100 annual value, and thus place these elections out of the reach of a mere money influence that may sometimes operate upon the masses—if you think this body is not sufficiently conservative—let them be elected by a more conservative portion of the community— that portion which has the greatest stake in the community—but do not strike out the elective principle altogether.

      §.24 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. HON. MR. REESOR—There are several other provisions in the proposed Constitution which seem to be ambiguous in their meaning, and before discussion upon them it would be well to have them fully explained. In the eleventh clause of the twenty-ninth resolution, for instance, it is declared that the General Parliament shall have power to make laws respecting ” all such works as shall, although lying wholly within any province, be specially declared by the acts authorizing them to be for the general advantage.” It would appear from this, that works like the Welland canal, which yield a very large revenue, will be given over to the General Government; and this being the case, surely this is a sufficient setoff, five times over, for the railways given by New Brunswick, without the annual subsidy proposed to be given to that province of $63,000. HON. MR. MACPHERSON—The cost of these works forms part of the public debt of Canada, which is to be borne in part by the Lower Provinces under the Confederation. HON. MR. CAMPBELL—The honorable gentleman will see that there are some works which, although local in their geographical position, are general in their character and results. Such works become the property of the General Government. The Welland canal is one of them, because, although it is local in its position, it is a work in which the whole country is interested, as the chief means of water communication between the western lakes and the sea. Other works, in the Lower Provinces, may be of the same character, and it is not safe to say that because a certain work lies wholly in one province, it is not to belong to the General Government. HON. MR. REESOR—I do not object to the General Government having the control of these works. It is, I believe, a wise provision to place them under such control. But I do say that it is unfair that an express stipulation should be made to pay one province a large sum per annum for certain works, while, at the same time, we throw in our public works, such as the Welland and St. Lawrence canals, without any consideration whatever. This, I think, is paying quite too much for the whistle. Then the answer of the Commissioner of Crown Lands about the export duty on minerals in Nova Scotia is not at all satisfactory. Whatever dues may be levied on minerals in Canada—and Canada, although it may contain no coal, is rich in gold, silver, copper, iron, and other ores—in the shape of a royalty or otherwise, go to the General Government, while in Nova Scotia they accrue for the benefit of the Local Government. HON. MR. ROSS—NO, they will not go to the General Government. HON. MR. REESOR—Well, there is nothing to the contrary in the resolutions, and you may depend upon it that whatever revenues the General Government may claim, under the proposed Constitution, will be fully insisted upon.

      §.92(10) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    2. HON. MR. AIKINS—The honorable gentleman says they will have the power, through their representatives, to make their appointments. Well, after reading the fourteenth resolution, it does appear to me that, after the first election of the Chamber, the people will have nothing at all to do with it. (Hear, hear.) The honorable gentleman says, however, that the representatives of the people will have the power of making these appointments. Who are the representatives of the people he refers to? The members of the Government, who will have this power ; or, in other words, the Crown will make the appointments. Hon. MR. MACPHERSON—With the advice of the representatives of the people. HON. MR. AIKINS—Yes, undoubtedly; but the people, nevertheless, will have nothing at all to do with the matter ; we advert again, in fact, to the old principle when the Crown made all the appointments. (Hear, hear.) Now, with regard to this question, I feel myself in this position, that although I may be in favour of the Crown making these appointments— upon which principle I express no opinion at this moment—if I voted for these resolutions I would give a vote, and every member of this House would give a vote, by which they would give themselves seats in this House as long as Providence thought fit to let them main. (Hear, hear.) I came here, honorable gentlemen, to conserve certain interests, to represent certain classes, and to reflect the views of those who sent me here so far as they accorded with my own judgment. But they did not send me here to change the Constitution under which I was appointed, and to sweep away at one dash the privileges they possess, one of which is, to give a seat in this House to him in whom they have confidence. It does not appear right to me that the members of this House should declare, by their own votes, that we shall remain here for all time to come. (Hear, hear.) The reasons given for the proposed change are various, and to some extent conflicting. We find one member of the Government telling us that it is because the Maritime Provinces are opposed to an elective Chamber, and hence we in Canada—the largest community and the most influential—give way to them, and set aside a principle that was solemnly adopted here, and so far has worked without prejudice to our interests. We find another gentleman, who, when the question came up years ago, Strongly opposed the elective principle, quite as strongly opposes it now, because since then certain municipalities have borrowed more than they are able to pay ! These are somewhat extraordinary reasons, and I trust the House will give them their due weight. I think, honorable gentlemen, that prior to the proposed change taking place, we ought not to declare by our own votes that we are entitled to permanent seats in this House,— without, at any rate, knowing whether the people consent to it or not ; and I do not think I am wrong in using this line of argument, when we have reason to believe that, even if the Crown-appointed members remain here, a large number of the elected members will also remain.

      §.24 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. Think of regular media as a one-way street where you can read a newspaper or listen to a report on television, but you have very limited ability to give your thoughts on the matter. Social media, on the other hand, is a two-way street that gives you the ability to communicate too.

      Very interesting, I would've never thought of there being completely two different media outlets. Being a staff of Met Media, specifically with the Metropolitan, it's promotes questions on how we as the newspaper can promote more active users in the traditional media outlets. I think of how we upload the newspaper also on the web so that students may access it quicker and more convenient.

    1. It is said they have not [Page 89] the power. But what is to prevent them from enforcing it? Suppose we had a conservative majority here, and a reform majority above— or a conservative majority above and a reform majority here—all elected under party obligations,—- what is to prevent a dead-lock between the chambers ? It may be called unconstitutional—- but what is to prevent the Councillors (especially if they feel that in the dispute of the hour they have the country at their back) from practically exercising all the powers that belong to us ? They might amend our money bills, they might throw out all our bills if they liked, and bring to a stop the whole machinery of government. And what could we do to prevent them ? But, even supposing this were not the case, and that the elective Upper House continued to be guided by that discretion which has heretofore actuated its proceedings,—still, I think, we must all feel that the election of members for such enormous districts as form the constituencies of the Upper House has become a great practical inconvenience. I say this from personal experience, having long taken an active interest in the electoral contests in Upper Canada. We have found greater difficulty in inducing candidates to offer for seats in the Upper House, than in getting ten times the number for the Lower House. The constituencies are so vast, that it is difficult to find gentlemen who have the will to incur the labor of such a contest, who are sufficiently known and popular enough throughout districts so wide, and who have money enough — (hear) — to pay the enormous bills, not incurred in any corrupt way,—do not fancy that I mean that for a moment—but the bills that are sent in after the contest is over, and which the candidates are compelled to pay if they ever hope to present themselves for re-election. (Hear, hear.) But honorable gentlemen say—” This is all very well, but you are taking an important power out of the hands of the people, which they now possess.” Now this is a mistake. We do not propose to do anything of the sort. What we propose is, that the Upper House shall be appointed from the best men of the country by those holding the confidence of the representatives of the people in this Chamber. It is proposed that the Government of the day, which only lives by the approval of this Chamber, shall make the appointments, and be responsible to the people for the selections they shall make. (Hear, hear.) Not a single appointment could be made, with regard to which the Government would not be open to censure, and which the representatives of the people, in this House, would not have an opportunity “of condemning. For myself, I have maintained the appointed principle, as in opposition to the elective, ever since I came into public life, and have never hesitated, when before the people, to state my opinions in the broadest manner ; and yet not in a single instance have I ever found a constituency in Upper Canada, or a public meeting declaring its disapproval of appointment by the Crown and its desire for election by the people at large. When the change was made in 1855 there was not a single petition from the people asking for it—-it was in a manner forced on the Legislature. The real reason for the change was, that before Responsible Government was introduced into this country, while the old oligarchical system existed, the Upper House continuously and systematically was at war with the popular branch, and threw out every measure of a liberal tendency. The result was, that in the famous ninety-two resolutions the introduction of the elective principle into the Upper House was declared to be indispensable. So long as Mr. ROBERT BALDWIN remained in public life, the thing could not be done ; but when he left, the deed was consummated. But it is said, that if the members are to be appointed for life, the number should be unlimited— that, in the event of a dead lock arising between that chamber and this, there should be power to overcome the difficulty by the appointment of more members. Well, under the British system, in the case of a legislative union, that might be a legitimate provision. But honorable gentlemen must see that the limitation of the numbers in the Upper House lies at the base of the whole compact on which this scheme rests. (Hear, hear.) It is perfectly clear, as was contended by those who represented Lower Canada in the Conference, that if the number of the Legislative Councillors was made capable of increase, you would thereby sweep away the whole protection they had from the Upper Chamber. But it has been said that, though you may not give the power to the Executive to increase the numbers of the Upper House, in the event of a dead-lock, you might limit the term for which the members are appointed. I was myself in favor of that proposition. I thought it would be well to provide for a more frequent change in the composition of the Upper House, and lessen the danger of the chamber being largely composed of gentlemen whose advanced years might forbid the punctual and vigorous discharge of their public [Page 90] duties. Still, the objection made to this was very strong. It was said : ” Suppose you appoint them for nine years, what will be the effect ? For the last three or four years of their term they would be anticipating its expiry, and anxiously looking to the Administration of the day for re-appointment ; and the consequence would be that a third of the members would be under the influence of the Executive.” The desire was to render the Upper House a thoroughly independent body—one that would be in the best position to canvass dispassionately the measures of this House, and stand up for the public interests in opposition to hasty or partisan legislation. It was contended that there is no fear of a dead-lock. We were reminded how the system of appointing for life had worked in past years, since Responsible Government was introduced ; we were told that the complaint was not then, that the Upper Chamber had been too obstructive a body—not that it had sought to restrain the popular will, but that it had too faithfully reflected the popular will. Undoubtedly that was the complaint formerly pressed upon us—{hear, hear)—and I readily admit that if ever there was a body to whom we could safely entrust the power which by this measure we propose to confer on the members of the Upper Chamber, it is the body of gentlemen who at this moment compose the Legislative Council of Canada. The forty-eight Councillors for Canada are to be chosen from the present chamber. There are now thirty-four members from the one section, and thirty-five from the other. I believe that of the sixty-nine, some will not desire to make their appearance here again, others, unhappily, from years and infirmity, may not have strength to do so ; and there may be others who will not desire to qualify under the Statute. It is quite clear that when twenty-four are selected for Upper Canada and twenty-four for Lower Canada, very few indeed of the present House will be excluded from the Federal Chamber ; and I confess I am not without hope that there may be some way yet found of providing for all who desire it, an honorable position in the Legislature of the country. (Hear, hear.) And, after all, is it not an imaginary fear—that of a dead-lock ? Is it at all probable that any body of gentlemen who may compose the Upper House, appointed as they will be for life, acting as they will do on personal and not party responsibility, possessing as they must, a deep stake in the welfare of the country, and desirous as they must be of holding the esteem of their fellow-subjects— would take so unreasonable a course as to imperil the whole political fabric ? The British House of Peers itself does not venture, à l’outrance, to resist the popular will, and can it be anticipated that our Upper Chamber would set itself rashly against the popular will? If any fear is to be entertained in the matter, is it not rather that the Councillors will be found too thoroughly in harmony with the popular feeling of the day ? And we have this satisfaction at any rate, that, so far as its first formation is concerned—so far as the present question is concerned—we shall have a body of gentlemen in whom every confidence may be placed.

      §§.24, 26, and 29 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

    1. In this context, the rather linear practice of stratigraphic excavation with its institutional, disciplinary, and performative underpinnings gives way to the raucous and uneven performance of punk rock music which often eschews expertise, barriers to access, and specialized knowledge (see Gnecco 2013)

      I like to think of the practice of stratigraphic excavation as our attempt to rein in the chaos that inevitably results as we are continually faced with and misunderstand the remains of the past. I would argue that disciplined stratigraphic excavation and a punk spirited practice are not entirely incompatible. You can rebel against the system in every aspect of your practice as long as you stand in the dole queue (and fill out your paperwork and context sheets properly). This may be slightly off your main argument.

    1. The grosser feeds the purer, Earth the Sea, Earth and the Sea feed Air, the Air those Fires Ethereal, and as lowest first the Moon; Whence in her visage round those spots, unpurg'd Vapours not yet into her substance turnd. [ 420 ] Nor doth the Moon no nourishment exhale From her moist Continent to higher Orbes. The Sun that light imparts to all, receives From all his alimental recompence In humid exhalations, and at Even [ 425 ] Sups with the Ocean: though in Heav'n the Trees Of life ambrosial frutage bear, and vines Yield Nectar, though from off the boughs each Morn We brush mellifluous Dewes, and find the ground Cover'd with pearly grain: yet God hath here [ 430 ] Varied his bounty so with new delights, As may compare with Heaven; and to taste Think not I shall be nice. So down they sat, And to thir viands fell,

      Where does this concept of hierarchical feed come from? Is it pure Milton invention?

    1. These possibili- ties are more likely to be seen if we think of large crises as the outcome of smaller scale enactments. When the enactment perspective is applied to crisis situations, several aspects stand out that are normally overlooked. To look for enactment themes in crises, for example, is to listen for verbs of enactment, words like manual control, intervene, cope, probe, alter, design, solve, decouple, try, peek and poke (Perrow, 1984, p. 333), talk, disregard, and improvise. These verbs may signify actions that have the potential to construct or limit later stages in an unfolding crisis

      Curious why temporality is never mentioned as a dynamic of enactment. It's somewhat implied in the idea of acting in the moment or responding after the fact, but sensemaking and social construction is inherently temporal.

    1. I made him just and right, Sufficient to have stood, though free to fall.

      Yes, and God also made mankind ignorant, with strong sensory appetites (for fruit like apples), with a desire for pleasure etc. etc. (I'm thinking of my mother who was so unattuned to childrearing that she expected me to act like an adult when I was 2 years old and punished me for acting by impulse according to reason). Just how much time did God spend teaching Adam and Eve how to control their desires, or role model such behavior for them?

      It seems to me that anyone who is authoritarian and makes strong rules- especially for someone who is not yet really adult, experienced and knowledgeable -is asking for rebellion. The gestalt therapists speak of Topdog and Underdog. When there is an authoritarian Topdog, there's bound to be an Underdog who rebels. What's needed is to assimilate Topdog (integrating some facets of our SHOULDs and throwing out others that are not necessary), building a self in the process that it is NOT split in two. In Freudian terms, we're talking about a healthy ego that can help us integrate our id and superego rather than a strict superego that is authoritarian with a rebellious id. But the root of the Old Testament is such a split.

      Adam and Eve were just born, right, though born as adults? (Personally, I think we can get beyond the split too of Creationism vs. Evolution. Why not view God as having given a lightning blast to chimpanzees which quickly led to ther evolving into humans?). So they weren't likely to have a lot of experience or become very mature yet. Of course they needed to go through the rebellious terrible twos!

      In Greek mythology too, we have the first female Pandora who almost immediately after she is created is left in a room with a box and told that she must not open it. So she does, of course. Her curiosity gets the better of her. And so she is blamed for all the evil in the world, as Eve is blamed. Unfair!

      Both of these situations are "set ups". What I don't understand is why God set up a test which Adam and Eve were bound to fail. So that he could fully assert His power over them?

      The Old Testament seems to me to be based on a split consciousness with a Topdog God and an Underdog mankind. This is a kind of parent/child, authority /subordinate setup. But it is not the only way to live.

      Yes, I'm trying to understand Milton, but in the process clarifying my own attitude toward his interpretation of The Fall AND that of the Bible and Christianity. As a Gnostic deeply influenced by Elaine Pagel's Gnostic Gospels and her Adam, Eve and the Serpent, I highly recommend these two books. To me, the make much more sense than the Fall in the Old Testament or the Miltonian interpretation.of it.

      Those of us who are expressing our own views here abd criticizing Milton and the Bible (and certainly I'm doing a lot of it) may be at odds with those who are dedicated believers in the Bible and take Genesis literally. But I'd be happy to hear a variety of views.

    1. Consult how we may henceforth most offendOur Enemy, our own loss how repair,How overcome this dire Calamity,What reinforcement we may gain from Hope, [ 190 ]If not what resolution from despare.

      Ironic, I think. The Fallen Angel has just rejected Satan's proposal of out right war as a bad idea. It would end in a disaster all over again. So he calls for a consultation of the fallen demons, one might say that he is call for a Parliament, which can come up with a better idea! I would rather suspect that Milton has in mind the "success" of resent English Parliament, as I might have of the US Congress, as he will unfold this grand consult. Love it!

    1. not conclusive

      I think "not conclusive" is still too certain based on the actual level of confidence in the paper. I'd have said "tentative" would reflect the paper more accurately. eg. The paper uses the term "risk averse approach" for the proposed 2C threshold, and say "we cannot exclude the risk...". It also use caveated language such as "could" and "may" a lot, and talk of "probability ... difficult to quantify".

    1. Why should a republic be small?  What happens, according to Rousseau, when a republic is too large?

      I think Rousseaus argument makes sense in the context of his era, but as Julie suggested, modern transportation and communication may have shrunk our nation to some degree. I also think Rousseau fails to address the other component that our Founders incorporated--Federalism. Some of Rousseaus issues are addressed through Federalism. We maintain smaller republics within a whole republic.

    1. It should be in miniature an exact portrait of the people at large. It should think, feel, reason, and act like them.

      This is the foundation of republicanism as the government should be based on popular sovereignty. However, a discussion question for students may be, how can we expect the government to act like the people when there are so many other influences such as money? or is the government truly a reflection of the people if only 58% of eligible voters vote? What is a solution to this problem?

    1. More importantly non-symbolic expressions of reality are traditionally understood to be outside the disciplinary boundaries of the human social sciences. These reasons may explain the convention but they cannot justify it. We can accept that for us to be able to talk and think about time necessitates our putting it into words. If this is all that is being expressed, it is not very much; if it equates reality with the symbol, it goes too far. There is no need to deny that all humans formulate meanings symbolically or that this is a fundamentally social process. There is an urgent need, however, to appreciate that time is an aspect of nature, and that nature encompasses the symbolic universe of human society. Once we recognise ourselves as bearers of all the multiple times of nature, and once we allow for nature to include symbolic expression, the gulf between the symbolic knower and nature as an external (unknowable) object can be dispensed with. The mutually exclusive dichotomies of nature and culture, subject and object become irrelevant.

      This is pretty dense but I think Adam is arguing that "social time" can exist without symbols and that "natural time" can itself be symbolic. If this is true, then conceptualizing time can be more holistic and rely less on dichotomy.

  9. Jul 2018
    1. Scholars have known for decades that people tend to search for and believe information that confirms what they already think is true. The new elements are social media and the global networks of friends who use it. People let their guard down on online platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, where friends, family members, and coworkers share photos, gossip, and a wide variety of other information. That’s one reason why people may fall for false news, as S. Shyam Sundar, a Pennsylvania State University communication professor, explains in The Conversation. Another reason: People are less skeptical of information they encounter on platforms they have personalized — through friend requests and “liked” pages, for instance — to reflect their interests and identity.
    1. There was, after all, public humanities before there (quite recently) was the phrase “public humanities”, and those of us for whom the term has meaning know that there are still many more public humanists than the very small proportion who now claim the name explicitly.

      And I think we still have a common conception of a "public intellectual" that may be a humanist, or someone like Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Is it useful to claim and apply a term that has baggage to describe working with the public in mind as an audience?

  10. course-computational-literary-analysis.netlify.com course-computational-literary-analysis.netlify.com
    1. The moment he saw me, he pulled out the pocket-book and pencil, and obstinately insisted on taking notes of everything that I said to him.

      In Mr.Jenning's narrative, the word "obstinate" has been used to describe Betteredge several times, and it seems from his descriptions of their interactions that Betteredge is indeed an obstinate old man, but a quick search through the story gives a peculiarly high frequency of this certain adjective. I think we could run an analysis on which characters have been described as "obstinate" more often, details of their character traits and what led to this comment. Or do some narrators use the word more often and it may be a particular way they see the difference in personality from themselves and other people?

    2. “What do you mean by pitying me?” she asked in a bitter whisper, as she passed to the door. “Don’t you see how happy I am? I’m going to the flower-show, Clack; and I’ve got the prettiest bonnet in London.” She completed the hollow mockery of that address by blowing me a kiss–and so left the room.

      Rachel's moodiness seems bizarre and creepy to me, and I suspect that huge disturbance to one's mind might be one of the verifications of the curse from the moonstone.Of course, I also think that the description of Rachel’s abnormal behavior here may because of Miss Clack's prejudice against her, which magnifies those negative qualities.I have to say,we can vividly feel from this part that a strong subjectivity of the narrative content is a significant feature of using first-person perspective to describe a story.