1,430 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2017
    1. Open is a Verb

      I like this exploration of open in the different roles it plays, but I wonder about the order. Starting out with open as a verb and open access may not be the best starting place for someone new to the conversation. Perhaps the best start would be an exploration of what might be more fundamental meanings such as libre/gratis generally (as they are not specific to open access) and open as in speech/beer/puppies.

    2. Endless Possibilities

      I can't suggest on the content of the video, so I'll put my observations here:

      1) I'm not in love with the original "truth" of OSS, that it can be copied "for free". The word "free" in English most often means "without cost" and I'm not sure this is the most common, basic truth about OSS. While it's true OSS can be copied without cost (not counting the costs of the tools & infrastructure necessary to access OSS and make a copy), the larger truth is that OSS can be copied without restriction, which includes without the restriction of cost, but also includes the absence of other restrictions.. Maybe the word "freely" would work better here.

      2) The metaphor of the cookie recipe seems pretty culturally specific. I wonder if a different metaphor might be more explanatory to a greater number of people?

      3) If I were going to add something (knowing that less is more), I would add a short bit about what happens with forks in the future. Do they ever engage with the code they forked from again? Do they become "recipes" in their own right that might generate other patches/forks? etc

    1. What we see unfolding right before our eyes is nothing less than Moore’s Law applied to the distribution of mis-information: an exponential growth of available technology coupled with a rapid collapse of costs.

      Moore's law of #infodisorder.

    2. What could technology companies do?Create an international advisory council.Provide researchers with the data related to initiatives aimed at improving public discourse.Provide transparent criteria for any algorithmic changes that down-rank content.Work collaboratively.Highlight contextual details and build visual indicators.Eliminate financial incentives.Crack down on computational amplification.Adequately moderate non-English content.Pay attention to audio/visual forms of mis- and dis-information.Provide metadata to trusted partners.Build fact-checking and verification tools.Build ‘authenticity engines’.Work on solutions specifically aimed at minimising the impact of filter bubbles:a. Let users customize feed and search algorithms. b. Diversify exposure to different people and views. c. Allow users to consume information privately d. Change the terminology used by the social networks.

      What tech companies should do about #infodisorder.

    3. Rather than simply thinking about communication as the transmission of information from one person to another, we must recognize that communication plays a fundamental role in representing shared beliefs. It is not just information, but drama — “a portrayal of the contending forces in the world.

      Carey's thinking that communication is more than just the transmission of info.

    4. Mis-information is when false information is shared, but no harm is meant.Dis-information is when false information is knowingly shared to cause harm.Mal-information is when genuine information is shared to cause harm, often by moving information designed to stay private into the public sphere.

      definitions of three types of #infodisorder: mis-, dis-, and mal-information

    5. we are witnessing something new: information pollution at a global scale; a complex web of motivations for creating, disseminating and consuming these ‘polluted’ messages; a myriad of content types and techniques for amplifying content; innumerable platforms hosting and reproducing this content; and breakneck speeds of communication between trusted peers

      Current info disorder is something new.

    1. COLLABORATION: Connected teachers work collaboratively. CURIOSITY: Connected teachers bring an inquiry mindset to classroom practice. COURAGE: Connected teachers give up some of their control over the learning experience. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: Connected teachers engage their students in public life. CARE: Connected teachers share their interests and learning with their students.

      the 5Cs of connected teaching

  2. Oct 2017
    1. In the 1960s and 70s, the hippie movement tried to pull together a “whole earth” movement, but then the world swung back toward the consumer and consumption culture of today.

      So why the swing back? Let's figure that out first. My experience (as an actual participant) was that these movements were not able to generate sustainability more compelling/widespread/efficient than consumption culture. So THAT would be the challenge to reviving their spirit.

    1. educators need to develop a comprehensive educational program that would include teaching students how to live in a world marked by multiple overlapping modes of literacy extending from print to visual culture and screen cultures

      Point 3/6

    2. Education is never innocent: It is always implicated in relations of power and specific visions of the present and future.

      This is what the right recognizes and fights for. Meanwhile the left is still caught up in the idea of neutral, objective education.

    3. create those public spaces for students to address how knowledge is related to the power of both self-definition and social agency. In part, this suggests providing students with the skills, ideas, values and authority necessary for them not only to be well-informed and knowledgeable across a number of traditions and disciplines, but also to be able to invest in the reality of a substantive democracy

      The role of education.

    4. Examples of such violence can be seen in the forms of an audit culture and empirically-driven teaching that dominates higher education. These educational projects amount to pedagogies of repression and serve primarily to numb the mind and produce what might be called dead zones of the imagination. These are pedagogies that are largely disciplinary and have little regard for contexts, history, making knowledge meaningful, or expanding what it means for students to be critically engaged agents.

      On audit culture in education. How do personalized/adaptive/competency-based learning and learning analytics support it?

    5. viewing public and higher education as democratic public spheres necessitates rejecting the notion that they should be reduced to sites for training students for the workforce

      Education is not just workforce training.

    6. Far more than a teaching method, education is a moral and political practice actively involved not only in the production of knowledge, skills and values but also in the construction of identities, modes of identification, and forms of individual and social agency.

      As in OKP's literacies, skills, identities, communities. Should values and agency be included in this list or are they the products of these other focuses?

    7. In the present moment, it becomes particularly important for educators and concerned citizens all over the world to protect and enlarge the critical formative educational cultures and public spheres that make democracy possible.

      public education supporting democracy

    1. What is the objective, what is the definition of success, as academia and its libraries engage in issues of scholarly communication? Answering this question crisply and with a clear sense of priority may allow libraries to evaluate their investments, and to organize, staff, and run their operations, with greater focus.

      Roger calls for clear scholcomm strategy.

    1. Influencing unfolding realities may be less about electing different leaders and policies than about learning how to change ourselves

      Change centered in the individual/human rather than the social/political. Wondering if this is too tethered by the USA's very unfortunate tendency to recast all wider social movements as self-improvement (eg, Buddhism, environmentalism > self-health, etc).

    2. The commons has also provided a language and ethic for thinking and acting like a commoner—collaborative, socially minded, embedded in nature, concerned with stewardship and long-term, respectful of the pluriverse that makes up our planet.

      Thinking like a commoner.

    3. Cultural critic Douglas Rushkoff has said, “I’ve given up on fixing the economy.  The economy is not broken.  It’s simply unjust.”

      Strong words from Douglas Rushkoff: "The economy is not broken. It's simply unjust."

    4. Even social democrats and liberals, the traditional foes of free-market dogma, seem locked into an archaic worldview and set of political strategies that makes their advocacy sound tinny. Their familiar progress-narrative—that economic growth, augmented by government interventions and redistribution, can in fact work and make society more stable and fair—is no longer persuasive.

      How progressive narratives are no longer satisfying.

    1. Through teaching Open, can we model the value of knowledge as commons in a way that shifts our thinking and practices towards the sharing and maintenance of all commons such as water, forests, soil, air and seeds?

      knowledge stewardship as an environmental practice

    2. He writes “The commons, briefly put, is about self-organized social systems for managing shared wealth.”

      Self-organized yes, but I argue that the right place to locate that self-organization and practice at this historical moment is within public institutions, which are in tension with Bollier's idea of the commons as beyond the State.

    3. All the OER, open pedagogy, open practices, teaching, learning, critical digital pedagogy, diversity, inclusion, etc. discussions all come back to this.

      I think especially in our given time now, both open practices and their location in public institutions is critically necessary.

    4. Or maybe it’s how we are defining ‘citizen’ these days. Has that word been co-opted to mean “worker”?

      Yes! There's such a strong narrative that the primary purpose of education is to prepare workers, often located in the interests of the students, as if they only have one-dimensional motivations to learn. Meanwhile, even employers call for richer education, as in their participation in AAC&U's Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) — which Hrabowski is a part of.

    1. problems of diffuse authority

      I assume Mike is connecting this to his thinking about how we need effective news filters in order to shoulder a large part of the responsibility for factchecking because we all don't usually have the time or the expertise.

    1. six interrelated competencies: mastering rigorous academic content, learning how to think critically and solve problems, working collaboratively, communicating effectively, directing one’s own learning, and developing an academic mindset

      deeper learning competencies

    1. Knowledge consumption and knowledge creation are not separate but parallel processes, as knowledge is co-constructed, contextualized, cumulative, iterative, and recursive.

      @clhendricksbc (above) is right that this is a key point. It brings out the Foucault in me, the way that discourse is a social process lodged in relationships of power. Maybe some of open's effect is to re/unbalance existing power relationships in the consumption and creation of knowledge.

    2. We hope that this chapter will inspire those of us in education to focus our critical and aspirational lenses on larger questions about the ideology embedded within our educational systems and the ways in which pedagogy impacts these systems. At the same time we hope to provide some tools and techniques to those who want to build a more empowering, collaborative, and just architecture for learning.

      I might reverse the priority of these: for me, OEP is first a worthy learning practice, and second a practice that can question and evolve ideology. Does the latter grow out of the former?

    1. So I’ll go ahead and say I see open as an end product less interesting. Open as a space that can produce open products: I find much more interesting.

      This is an absolutely critical distinction. The open education community's focus on OER has emphasized product-focused practices, when we should be focused on practices that are enabled by or produce open products as a byproduct of our interaction.

    1. Sixty-three percent of instructors said that developing a course with OER takes at least one and a half times as much time as a traditional course.

      63% instructors say developing OER course took 1.5x a traditional course. < This doesn't seem that high, given that a traditional course presumably uses an existing textbook or course materials. Is the level of effort less the second time the course is taught?

    2. Launching OER Degree Pathways: An Early Snapshot of Achieving the Dream’s OER Degree Initiative and Emerging Lessons

      This is an early formal report on the findings of the ATD OER Degree program. I'm annotating as a part of the Open Education 2017 conference in Anaheim, where this snapshot was presented by Richard Sebastian and Rebecca Griffiths, and invite others to do the same. Im suing the opened17 tag, along with at tag related to this particular presentation there: opened17BXfW

    1. OER-Enabled Pedagogy is the set of teaching and learning practices only practical in the context of the 5R permissions characteristic of open educational resources. Some people – but not all – use the terms “open pedagogy” or “open educational practices” synonymously.

      OER-enabled pedagogy is the OEG's preferred name for what other's might call "open pedagogy" or "open educational practices". David Wiley blogs about this specific naming.

  3. Sep 2017
    1. Jessica had never used a computer and was surprised to learn that technology is more than just a tool for the young men in her community to promote illicit pictures.

      perception of tech as something for male pleasure

    2. governments are a key means of safeguarding ‘public good’ concerns in the face of increased for-profit provision of online education

      why govt in digital ed?

    3. the Rapporteur stressed the need for robust government oversight of education and technology policy-making, particularly in terms of ensuring that digitally innovative forms of education provision do not lead to socially restrictive outcomes.

      why govt in digital ed?

    4. Having reached a point where the ability to make meaningful use of digital technology determines, to a significant extent, an individual’s ability to participate in modern societies and economies, then the need for action and intervention is obvious.

      digital skills = success in contemporary society/economy

    5. Members of the Broadband Commission Working Group on Education RECOMMEND that the Commission

      The commission should:

      1. Facilitate info exchange
      2. Establish international frameworks
      3. Measure digital skills levels
    6. Some of the most relevant ‘digital skills’ likely to arise from these developments may not involve the direct use of digital technology.

      "Instead, they will relate to people’s awareness and understandings of digital technologies that they do not necessarily touch and control but which nevertheless influence their lives in profound ways."

    7. Pronounced inequalities and disparities exist in terms of individuals’ digital skills and competencies within communities, countries and regions.

      Foundations to address:

      1. Institutional capacity and continuity
      2. GOV involvement
      3. Public/private partnerships managed via nonprofit/neutral bodies
      4. Localization/contextualization
      5. Scaling existing promising practices
      6. Using existing technologies
      7. Blending non-digital approaches
      8. Bridge formal/informal skills provision
      9. Teacher PD
      10. Evaluation/evidence
    8. Foster ‘soft’ and ‘complementary’ digital skills: Incorporation of ‘twenty-first century skills’ into national curricula; development and promotion of practical programmes that aim to inform and safeguard digital safety; implications of online activities; development of digital literacy and citizenship; knowledge of digital rights; and awareness of how digital technology, big data and algorithms shape society.

      soft/complementary digital skills

    9. The term ‘digital skills’ refers to a range of different abilities, many of which are not only ‘skills’ per se, but a combination of behaviours, expertise, know-how, work habits, character traits, dispositions and critical understandings.

      digital skills as constellations of capabilities

    1. A commercial/proprietary vendor borrows funding, setting that borrowed funding against potential future revenue; an open-source community pools present capacity to create a sustainable future.

      The roadmap differences between proprietary and open/community source.

    2. Socio-economic factors are therefore potentially of particular significance to the NGDLE conversation, but are all too often not adequately represented or are reduced to a simplistic (and unsustainable, unless an infinitely expandable market is assumed) model of counting new LMS adoptions.

      socio-economic factors in LMS adoption

    3. we simply had far less experience in component-based architectures and open application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow the interconnection and communication of systems and components

      technical reasons for NGDLE failure

    4. At an institutional level, the lack of a clearly articulated transition path from the LMS to a potentially more flexible, component-based successor was undoubtedly a significant factor.

      Institutional reason for NGDLE failure.

  4. futurepress.github.io futurepress.github.io
    1. There was a fishy flavor to the milk, too, which I could not at all account for, till one morning happening to take a stroll along the beach among some fishermen’s boats, I saw Hosea’s brindled cow feeding on fish remnants, and marching along the sand with each foot in a cod’s decapitated head, looking very slip-shod, I assure ye.

      Why the milk tastes fishy: the cows eat fish.

    1. What if they failed because there aren’t just one or two factors that account for the difference that human tutors make?

      yes: "tutoring" is too often seen as a black box that returns a sigma of educational improvement, but how?

    Tags

    Annotators

  5. Aug 2017
  6. readium.firebaseapp.com readium.firebaseapp.com
  7. Jul 2017
    1. he wishes Lacuna could be updated more easily. Texts must be submitted to the tech team for uploading, which can take a few days, and once his grant funded fellowship ended, he had to upload documents on his own, he said.

      Major difference with Hypothesis. Enabling annotation only in a specialized content repository drastically limits the utility of annotation.

    1. Social Media Is The New Smoking

      While I understand why people might have experiences that would lead them to hold the views in this post, these views generalize such experience to describe all social media use. Many people have profoundly valuable and deep social connections on social media, and still also have valuable FTF social connections. Like any broad human activity, social media use is more complex than imagined here. Even smoking itself can't always be seen as all bad, see this account of how smoking breaks can be seen supporting worker rights and social connection.

    1. those who are making a killing off cigarettes and anti-smoking campaigns alike

      Someone is making a killing off anti-smoking campaigns? Even if that is sorta true, I can't imagine that the amount of money involved is more than a tiny percentage of the money generated by the tobacco industry.