This line stands out to me because it seems to imply that something held Eveline back, but that it was not necessarily her own will. It reminds me of the discussion we had about paralysis in these stories.

This reminds me of the term "sacrifice zones" that we've been reading about.

"Nauru...was developed to disappear...controlled its fate as a disposable country." This quote reminds me of a movie where a couple had a second child in order to help their first child with her cancer battle by having the healthy child provide organs and such. The movie is not environment related but the concept is similar and compares when the text previously mentioned the plan for the country, which was "...mining phosphate until the island was an empty shell."

This is one of the key points. This reminds me of the readings about jurisdiction two weeks ago anyhow it led to many Native Women being abused.

Exactly. So the first job is to explain this on day one and show students how to do it.

This must have been so confusing. It reminds me of how some states don't send out explanations for the measures and people on ballots when voting. I didn't know California was one of the few states who did this until recently. Talk about voter suppression.

This reminds me of the current issue with the keystone oil pipe going through native land.

Once again, this reminds me of Dutro's emphasis on the importance of a teacher having a critical understanding of how these issues affect the lives of our students in ways they may or may not affect our own. Young people are affected by these issues, and we need to create opportunities to be critical of these issues in literacy.

Wow this reminds me of one my students who has an IEP but raps outside of school. I wouldn't say he is disengaged but what are we doing as teachers to make them engaged in instruction.

What is consider a disengaged learner.

This word reminds me of a disgusted or angry response...not apologetic

Being to rain down reminds me of the start of a storm, or something big about to happen.

This is a really powerful sentence. There are so many ways we can increase our capacities to better engage students; if students are not engaged, then there is a high chance it is something the teacher needs to change or adjust. This reminds me of the Vulnerable Heart of Literacy and how Dutro asks educators to increase our capacity to be vulnerable and bare critical witness and testimony in the classroom in order to use student testimony as an entry point and tool for literacy. This is a way we can work on ourselves as educators.

This poem reminds me of the book "The Pushout: The Civilization of Black Girls in School" where cultural differences add to ignorance. In the book, some girls were described as rude or loud, but they grew up learning from their parents to ask questions if they were confused and to stand up for themselves.

One of the most profound aspects of literature is its ability to inspire empathy for others' experiences. Reminds me of Steven Pinker's assertion that the popularization of the novel led to a significant decrease in social acceptance of cruelty and violence because novels offer us the opportunity to empathize with others.

This reminds me of the "mirror-window" element that multicultural literature may bring into the classroom. Students are given the opportunity to see themselves represented in a text while learning about the lives of others. This would allow students to identify the intersections between their lives and stories to those of others, as this reading mentions.

reminds me of the vegan debate; or of the carbon footprint idea

This reminds me of Action-Research projects. The DBR project may only apply to oneself after completion.

This reminds me of the article where it talked about how some people only get their information from other people.

This reminds me of the article we read about how it could be the reader that's bias.

This reminds me of the articles we read when it said that the news was so divided that they were creating 2 different realities. (This can be used in my literature review)

reminds me of the influeza and how it survived and dominated due to a steady human fuel at camps and war but here is due to poor communities in which we find people with an already poor health and a overpopulated community who does not have the resources and economic benefit to receive proper treatment.

reminds me of the article we read on gentrification and racial injustice on the benefit of science

reminds me of destiny that everyone is predestined in there lives.

Reminds me of "whatever is meant to happen will happen"

I love this quote and the rest of this paragraph. It reminds me of Price's point that the situation is responsible for students' barriers, not students' internal personalities or characters.

This reminds me of code-meshing and Young's celebration of it. The language of the oppressed is not "marginal" to society, it is always "inside" society and the point is to change society so that stigmatized language varieties can be become "languages for themselves" and not "languages for others." When something is for others, it has no strength or meaning or freedom to define itself, its own worth, value, meanings, uses, ideas. It is always for someone else, from someone else's point of view. Freire is saying that we need to stop thinking of the oppressed only through the lens of the oppressor.

The terms describe here are all used as degrading terms people use to classify a group that they hate. It sort of reminds me of the rhetoric that America has been listening to in the last four years. That in a way slowly was normalized.

Once again, just because someone has gay friends or family, doesn't make them a fan of equality. Just like just because someone has black friends, it doesn't make them not racist.

This reminds me of a Ted Bundy new article that worded things similarly.

This reminds me of the images of children being put into cages along the Southern border of the United States during this current administration. Some people, not all, take satisfaction in the fact that children were taken away from their families and being treated like animals/criminals.

Reminds me of what Richard Rohr says about experiencing sin. Openly experiencing it and realizing that it doesn't satisfy.

Reminds me of the Leeroy Jenkin's meme. Othello is just rushing in and wanting to kill right away without thinking of the outcome.

This reminds me of the movie Minority Report. All of the past events in the movie led to an event occurring in the future, and each individual had a choice to how they would act in the present. This represented our access to free will, and our ability to make choices to shape our future.

This seriously reminds me of colonization. I guess it makes sense that there were people around before that were considered the "original settlements/ indigenous" and then there were "foreigners" that came and invaded. Therefore, I guess both of them partook in creating a settlement, and thats why the origins of cities may have two foundation stories.

The non-personalized nudge

An employer can choose to let their employee set up their own pensions plan or set them up with a default plan and allow them to change. The second scenario is an "architected choice" that relies on two phenomena:

1. The fact people often fail to set up a retirement plan
2. The tendency of people to stick with default rules

The default plan is a non-personalized nudge which (supposedly) benefits the people as well as society.

This reminds me of Michael Malice's idea of "the people that need leaders are not able to pick good ones".

This reminds me of "Products are functions" where your personal data is a variable than enters into the function to determine the output.

In this moment where the Bishop looks in the mirror for the first time, he is in this state of undress, part the "role" of a Bishop, and part the "role" of his true sinful self. In saying to Irma that he wants to be by himself, he is meaning with the physical reflection of himself. He also directly asks the mirror question, but is quite literally asking this reflected version of himself. He is essentially having this identity crises of who he is and how the world sees him. When he says, "And in your gilt-edged glass, what was I? Never - I affirm it before God Who sees me - I never desired the episcopal throne," this conversation between him and his reflection reminds me of a post-death judgement of God. Moreover, that his reflection is a bit of a omnipotent version of himself who knows all of his desires and intentions, even those not truly known to himself. In this moment in the brothel, staring at his reflection, he is laid bare (both inside and out).

Kind of reminds me of epigraphs in Middlemarch

the way the little boy is described kind of reminds me of a fierce little kitten or cub

This line stood out to me because Theseus addresses something that most characters in tragedies are oblivious to: people don't always say what they are trying to express or how they feel. This reminds me of Lear's apology or lack thereof, similarly to the greeting that Theseus received, Lear never explicitly apologizes to Cordelia, but reading between the lines, Cordelia can understand his intentions. Lear fails to do this in the earlier scene of the play when each daughter confesses how much they care about their father. Cordelia cannot put into words her love for her father, but Lear fails to recognize this underlying meaning in her statement toward him.

Reminds me of the chinese room problem.

This reminds me of a discussion in another class about complex dynamic systems.

this passage also reminds me of Laura's epiphany about death in the Garden Party

It's quite interesting how Mansfield subtly shows her heroin character's innocence through this kind of scene—mostly oblivious to what is going on in a grander context. On the same note, it seems that it's Mansfield's way of foreshadowing a kind of distress of what is to come in the later texts, which also reminds me of The Garden Party.

This reminds me of a time in high school when my history teacher showed us a political ad campaign against a candidate and if you slow it down, the way the words come up on the screen it says, "rats" so that you associate that candidate as a rat.

reminds me of the Black Codes African Americans had to endure

This reminds me of the Train up a child verse. That part that says, "in the way he should go" is the Hebrew concept of taste or bent or what this model is calling BIAS. Which sounds even more solid, "Train up a child according to his/her bias and when they are old they won't depart from it." (Proverbs 22:6)

Frankenstein sympathizing with Walton is similar to Frankenstein's professor egging him on with his pursuit for knowledge, there seems to be another parallel.

This reminds me of Donald Trump asking black reporter April Ryan to set up a meeting for him with black lawmakers. As if all Blacks know one another.

This "form in wax" idea reminds me of John Locke theory about people being born a blank slate. While Locke was after both Shakespeare and midsummer's time, I think the concept is similarly implied in this sentence. The quote before stating "your father should be as a god" gives this man vs. woman power binary, putting men at a significantly higher, even godly level. In context of the story, it seems Theseus is implying that Hermia's father made her who she is, and that he can also "leave the figure or disfigure it," giving power to Egeus, even when Hermia is no longer a child. I think these words in the moment are very misogynistic, but contrast well with her later character development, emphasizing how strongly independent she is, overcoming her wax fate.

This just gives me a weird feeling. Reminds me of like super religious people adopting children from other countries just to fulfill their white savior complex.

I feel like these are al very common tropes on how to win over a woman. Further I think it's interesting how the father disapproves of these methods. I also feel like this description is very fantastical and whimiscal. And also it kinda reminds me of romeo and juliet

Reminds me of Haraway's writings about embodied and situated knowledge.

This reminds me of the Abolitionist video, where they discuss that the structure of schools must be taken down and reformed. My group came up with an analogy on the topic which I think speaks volumes, as one of us said that when you pick a weed, you can't just grab it from the top. Nothing will change, it will just grow larger over time, but one must pick a weed from the roots, because from there, the weed will disappear, and that makes room for something else to grow in its place.

This reminds me of J. Marion Sims. He performed gynecology practices on his slaves and other's slaves without anesthesia and people defend him because he was a man of his time and slaves were lucky to get any healthcare.

This understanding reminds me a lot of Gholdy Muhammed's methodologies in the "Abolitionist Pedagogies" video. She outlined 4 learning goals in the video, and in her book "Cultivating Genius", that are reminiscent of these ones.

To me, this is the scariest part of this whole thing. We always seem to try to fix/manage things after they have already happened and very rarely do this preventatively. Like to me it is obvious that chemicals are going to be bad for organisms...probably because I have been taught that my entire life. But how did it take this long to figure out we shouldn't be just throwing chemicals in places?

My mom always says "Ask for permission not forgiveness"...and this reminds me of that

How are we going to manage these issues if they are passed down to future generations? That makes it way more complicated...

It reminds me of the buffalo decline over the 19th century. They were almost hunted to extinction as colonials shot them from trains for sport.

Many Natives treated women as equals. This reminds me of one of the previous readings in which it talked about how some women were not hesitant to voice their opinions when it came to the decision of giving up their lands.

This sentence reminds me of the "what-ifs" mentioned by Professor Gardner in lecture. Even though Bobby is saying that he will never love another girl again, he and Nancy had serious barriers to their relationship that Herb, Nancy, and almost all of Holcomb recognized. It's interesting to wonder if they would've overcome the societal challenge of religion if the murders never happened. Capote is almost leading us straight to that with this sentence. Additionally, I think it's worthwhile to note that Bobby and Nancy didn't have to break this expectation because they never got the opportunity. On a societal level, everything in terms of this issue of religion remained in place and unquestioned. While the Clutter family is gone and Holcomb is forever changed, it is also characteristically unaltered in this respect.

I love this!! Reminds me of my former job working with students at Upward Bound MSU. Our program targeted future first generation college students and those who qualified for free/reduced lunch. They were able to have many wonderful opportunities (field trips across campus and across the United States) for free the program. It was awesome.

The "there was alcohol involved" argument reminds me of a Supreme Court Senate confirmation hearing from 2018. Sarah Deer makes a great point that that argument is ridiculous and should never be allowed in the first place.

This is really powerful to me. I often feel myself clinging to hope while having a negative outlook on the things happening in the world around me. This puts into words some of the mixed feelings I have experienced when hoping for a better world. It reminds me of the saying: "hope for the best, expect for the worst."

This reminds me of a comment made in the previous piece we read, about the rules of writing. The most effective writers regularly took opportunities to test their writing by getting reactions from readers and then improving their writing incrementally. I think this ties into this piece as well; the point of peer reviewing is not to "grade like the teacher," but to provide an honest reaction to the piece you're reading, engage with it, and provide commentary that helps the writer grow.

This statement really reminds me of parenting. Parents have to push their kids in order to get them to do better. But, this can't be done if they are always getting praised. If you just got praised your whole life, you would never be prepared for the real world.

Here's the recurring use of "affinity groups," but thinking about it not as an individual quality reminds me of another article that we read in INTE 2500 that no matter what we think, it belongs, in theory, to at least one affinity group

Very insightful

Papillon: It's a great nuisance that Mr. Boeuf can't come. But that's no reason for you to go to pieces. Mrs. Boeuf: [with difficulty] It's not...it's...well I was chased here all the way from the house by a rhinoceros...<

The first rhino occurrence of Act 2 follows Botard's mind-bending and condescending denial of their existence. The first person to encounter the rhino is Mrs. Boeuf, who was chased from her home to the office off-stage. Though she is evidently frazzled by the experience, she comes into work first explaining her husband's sick leave rather than opening with the information most people would, which is of course the rhino she barely escaped from and is currently outside the office endangering everyone. If Mrs. Boeuf's response wasn't absurd enough, Berenger's first question is about the number of horns. Botard still doubts the rhinos' existence. At this point, the audience still may doubt their existence too since all they have as evidence are inauthentic seeming reactions and off-stage noises that corresponded with Jean's breaks in character, and though Botard's logic is ridiculous, it is enough for the audience to hold out on wholly believing. However, after Botard expresses his doubt, a sound is heard and the staircase seems to collapse, then "an anguished trumpeting" is heard from below. Daisy exclaims "My God!" and Mrs. Boeuf "Oh! Ah!," a throw back to the previous act. In classic Berenger fashion, he remains relatively calm and makes Mrs. Boeuf a drink and tells her to keep calm. Botard continues to brush off the sounds as an illusion until finally, he looks and sees it for himself. Between the multiple accounts of its existence, the sounds of it and its destruction, and the conversion of the skeptic into a believer, the audience is more inclined to believe that the rhinos are in fact real, in spite of the puzzling reactions both before and after this point. Additionally, the directionality of the sound (ex. the sound of the staircase collapsing on stage left where the staircase is visually, or the sound of the rhino bellowing from below) may help immerse the audience further. If, according to Camus, a man can only define another being practically by "the sum of their consequences" or by "outlining their universe," the audience perceives the existence of the rhinos similarly. By denying the audience visual confirmation and only providing sounds and the consequences of the Rhinos actions, Ionesco prevents the audience from developing a false sense of knowing the rhinos that goes beyond the outline of their universe. Thus, I do believe this feeling is an absurd one. Additionally, the townspeople's conversations contribute more to this absurd feeling. Most notably, I think of Botard's attempts to use logic and reasoning to deny the existence of the rhino only to sound highly irrational, contradictory, and condescending and Berenger's continued questioning of the race and number of horns of the rhinos. This reminds me of when Camus wrote "what is absurd is the confrontation of this irrational and the wild longing for clarity whose call echoes in human heart." Both Botard and Berenger's attempted use of thought and logic about the rhinos brings them farther away from any sense of clarity or course of action. E

[The noise becomes very loud] Jean: [to BERENGER, almost shouting to make himself heard above the noise which he has not become conscious of]<

The offstage sound of the rhinoceros is clear as day to the audience, but everyone in the town square remains oblivious, even when the noise increases. This becomes even more ridiculous when Jean begins to raise his voice over a sound he apparently is still not "conscious" of. In mid-sentence, Jean stops shouting and finally notices the sound, asking "What's going on?" and then again, but in different words, "Whatever is it?" The waitress repeats his last question. Berenger remains indifferent. Then Jean exclaims "Oh, a rhinoceros!" The phrase is rapidly repeated by the waitress, grocer, and grocer's wife. Variations of Jean's phrases as well as "Ahs" and "Ohs" are scattered throughout the next page of dialogue as the townspeople converse. The repetition and similarity in their language is slightly off-putting and their delayed response seems to imply a fear of thinking individually and a need to react as a collective (also, it reminds me a bit of when a teacher asks a question to a class that most people know the answer to, but there's a long pause before anyone responds because everyone doubts themself and requires the validation of others). Overall, there seems to be a general distrust towards one's own mind.

Wow! This reminds me a lot of court cases in which court cases overrule years' worth of limitation on certain peoples.

always reminds me of the 'tester' character in Job and how God allows and even sometimes endorses the testing. For what purpose and to what end?

This reminds me of "there is no teaching without learning." The generative nature of the languages seems very related to this.

This reminds me of what free play can do for children, especially if teachers wait to step in and allow children time and space to explore

Reminds me of our program and how we are all connected to a variety of contexts!

This reminds me a little bit of Howard Garner and his Different Multiple Intelligences. How each child learns differently. Expression is so important for children. They need these opportunities.

This reminds me of the Andrew Jackson quote where he conveyed that Marshall's decisions did not matter because he could not enforce them. It seems like there are often laws in place that are just ignored for the sake of the state or settlers.

I find it interesting that McGirt was kind of used by the Creek Nation as a sort of vehicle for them to argue. The article is saying while it's not about arguing whether or not he is guilty, but who has the means to actually punish him, and what's happening is who has the authority, the State or Tribe. This reminds me of the Supreme Court Case Brown v Board, where both cases have the potential to be landmark essentially.

This reminds me of the term used in week one of domestic dependent nations.

This reminds me of systematic desensitization, wherein, an individual is presented with and exposed to different levels of anxiety-/fear-eliciting stimuli, all while being taught relaxation techniques. The procedures and steps taken to get Peter to accept the rabbit is through gradual exposure. This definitely contributed to the literature of clinical psychology in the treatment of phobias.

This reminds me of Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory, he is watching another person interact with the object that terrifies him, and yet the other person does not seem to share the same fear response as him. He watched Barbara pick up the rat, which conveys the message that others don't fear it, and it does not seem to do any harm. Although the observation of this, I do not believe, would be enough to provide change in his conditioned response, as it had most likely been with him for a while. One thing I am wondering based on this certain situation is if he felt less afraid due to the distance between him and the rat or because another person is holding the rat, which in turn might provide a sense of security that the threat has been detained.

I wonder why Peter was very fond of Dr. S? What did Dr. S do in order for Peter to be very fond of him, did he resemble his father? The suggestion that Dr. S's presence in the room alone contributed to Peter's well-being reminds me of Applied Behavior Analysis. ABA operates off the principles of operant conditioning which is usually taught along with classical conditioning in today's intro to psychology courses. Anyways, when ABA is used to help children who have autism in learning adaptive behavior, a good relationship between the provider and the child must be established before direct intervention can take place. The child and the provider gain their relationship through unstructured and eventually structured play. The child then associates the provider with good things and in turn allows for easier reception of a given intervention. If Dr. S did something similar with Peter, then it provides some early evidence of reinforcement pairing (i.e., when the provider themselves have become a reinforcing factor for the child).

This reminds me of the Science versus God argument that has been going on for decades

This reminds me of in Psychology we talk about the nature vs nurture debate. I think that genetics does play a big part in shaping us, but having the right environment plays a part as well.

I think that Dawkin's comparison of criminals to broken machines is not a good analogy. It reminds me of the genetic engineering thought probe which talks about using technology to alter genetic makeup.(196 Doing Philosophy) I think that the machine analogy fits well with causal determinisim which states that every event is the consequence of past event plus laws of nature, However modern science does not support this view.

Reminds me of so-called 'strong objectivity,' amplifying researcher bias since anyway it's irremovable.

This whole section reminds me of a project students did at our school (12 year olds). The questions were so focused and produced a specific type of product. The questions in this article could have blown the project wide open and engaged the students so much more authentically. This shows how the principles of Reggio Emilia can certainly be applied working with older students as well. The open questions invite the students to engage fully.

This reminds me of the importance of a question posed to the children. One, it must be broad and open-ended in nature. Second, I must consider the purpose of the question being asked.

all these questions reminds me of the TED talks and advice from others when considering an option or decision.

i can see this working out pretty well. this reminds me of an english teacher who did this and every time we were assigned to read a book and encountered unknown words i knew what the meaning was before hands.

It's interesting to think of other lower/middle class groups that provide entre to businesses and apprenticeships. It also reminds me of the current practice of privileged youth accessing internships/opportunities through family connections creating a pathway to professional careers and higher earning.

So much about residential schools reminds me of what happened and is continuing to happen in North Korea . Both peoples are stripped of their identities, separated from family, deprived of individual identities, vilified in public, pitted against one another. It's disgusting to see how one group of people will demoralize, dehumanize and disenfranchise another group.

This reminds me of how federal jurisdiction overrules tribal ordinances.

Reminds me of what schools are forcing the virtual students to do. They want us to require students have their cameras on to monitor their focus.

This reminds me of the work I am doing now. We are using a public park as our classroom and have had many community members stop and ask us about it or express their gratitude for us being in the community.

This reminds me of a quote from Richard Feynman who while not connected to Reggio inspires my thinking.

The prize is in the pleasure of finding the thing out, the kick in the discovery, the observation that other people use it [my work]--those are the real things, the honors are unreal to me. Richard Feynman

To offer proof of his beliefs, make an impact and inspire transformation did not happen overnight. It took generations and a lifetime to drive change. This reminds me to be patient in my practice and in my advocacy.

Ares??? Condemning violence??? I thought I'd never see it. Seriously though, this seems contradictory since everything we've seen from Ares so far has been very 'bloodthirsty'. I guess he only likes violence when it is thrust upon others/mortals, and not when it's upon himself. Seems ironic though, since he's the god of war. It reminds me of how kings in the past would fight alongside their armies in battle. Ares seems like the king who would choose to opt out.

That's totally fine, and this also reminds me of the visualization article we read this week. Perhaps in the process of creating different types of visual displays, you will gradually build up a clearer image of what you want to investigate.

This reminds me of the visualization article we've just read, that it's useful to discover the value of visualization itself as a research process. In this case, Airtable might be the one that you want to engage with. My question here is how do you think that the visual functions of Airtable are sufficient enough to represent your argument?

This reminds me of the visualization article we've just read, that it's useful to discover the value of visualization itself as a research process. In this case, Airtable might be the one that you want to engage with. My question here is how do you think that the visual functions of Airtable are sufficient enough to represent your argument?

This reminds me of the Sandcastles paper, just because the visualization is not useful to a broad audience doesn't mean its not worth making and breaking.

Reminds me of the movie Room. Still sad to read.

This description reminds me of a laboratory - a place for research, discoveries, and plenty of materials.

This reminds me of Vitruvius' description of Greek Temples. In Book 3, he goes into detail on the way in which ancient temples should be designed, specifying that their composition must be based on symmetry and proportion similar to how the human body is composed. This idea that temples are created to form a link between our world and that of the gods is clearly present in Hinduism as well. Immediately upon starting this reading, I wonder what other similarities and differences exist in the design and concept of Hindu Temples and that of other cultures, specifically the ancient Greeks and Romans.

I strongly agree with this statement, without rules to guide us then it can often be easy to get lost in the endless possibilities that come with absolute freedom. In some ways it reminds me of the statement "ignorance is bliss". If all we know are the rules and we have the notion that we must follow them, it can be much easier to achieve a goal than when given free reigns over our choices.

The three point rule also reminds me of elementary school when they first teach you how to write essays. They tell you the structure of your essay should follow something like: Intro, Thesis, First, Second, Third, In conclusion. Up till 9th grade I was stuck in the idea that an essay would only flow if I had 3 points supporting my thesis and each with 2 explanation sentences. However, my literature teacher showed us that this method of 1 2 3 does not make the essay flow, but instead cuts it up into different pieces.

This reminds me of a concept I learned in psychology called "deindividualization." It is the loss of self-awareness in groups. I found myself doing this a lot in my previous English classes. There would be times when I chose to use others' ideas than my own in writing because I was insecure about my own. On top of that, my previous English classes valued composition over creativity, so it didn't exactly feel refraining; it was rather more for convenience. And because always approached writing like this, the transition to creativity can get rather difficult sometimes.

This reminds me of a term I learned in psychology called "Interference". There is "Proactive interference" where you can not learn something new because you learned something before that, that subsequently INTERFERES with learning. Like Ruth that used previous rules from past english classes that made her less fluid and rigid in her current writing situation, which caused a block.

This justify my previous statement, building off of the envy I was discussing, Claire was feel a bit jealous towards her friends and she know knows how to express it.

We see Claire truly express her feelings about Angela to Aaron. She has a form of envy and jealousy for Angela's mother's being alive.

Although her mother died claire needs to learn to let go of the past and move on because the more she grieves is the more she hurts herself

These details make me question if Claire is so jealous of Angela and Aarons mom surviving that she has grown a disdain towards black people. Could this be why she sees no wrong in her actions?

I am reading a book and (in someways) it has some ties to baseball, and in the book the narrator makes the argument that baseball is a different form of war that does not facilitate killing, but it still holds within it the aggression, patriotism, and competition of war. This part that I highlighted here reminds me of just that, as it speaks in ways that "rhymes" ('history doesn't repeat itself, it speaks in rhymes' - Mark Twain) with the baseball metaphor, but in the way that society functions. In saying that, there is patriotism in acadademics, social ways with oral and written language and cultural practices which (like social reproduction) eliminate the competition.

I think this is extremely interesting. The telegraph at this time was being used for buyers to essentially preorder grain, to ensure they maintained the current price it was. This almost reminds me of a combination of modern actions of buying stock and online shopping. As stock fluctuates in price constantly the price of grain back then seemed to as well, therefore by placing a transaction over the telegraph these buys claimed their price and items. Similar to online shopping in how the buyers are purchasing an item not yet in their sites but only exists in theory. By fronting the money or the intention of payment they are reserving the right to the item before it is in their possession.

Presumably this is so that you can import React libraries, even if they depend on ReactDOM, and they will work with Svelte instead.

Reminds me of Wine. IIRC they have some system calls that they just make to be no-ops on Linux.

This reminds me of a tv show that I was watching a few days ago where researchers mixed the elderly people from a retirement home with a kindergarten class and the elderly took care of the kids while kids brought back joy into their lives. Overall the elder participants’ health improved drastically and they made great friends with the children. A similar approach maybe helpful here?

it reminds me of the notion of restorative justice vs. punitive justice

1079-1144: Basically, the knight marries the hag and then goes into hiding because he's ashamed about how ugly his wife is. He's not happy when he gets into bed with her and he tosses and turns all night. She just lies there, smiling, and asks him if all husbands treat their wives this way. She reminds him she saved his life and has never wronged him. Why won’t he treat her right on the night of their wedding? The knight tells her that it’s because she’s ugly and old. The hag says she can fix that in three days if he treats her better. She then gives him a really long lecture about thinking that rich people are better than poor people. She calls him arrogant, saying that real men are the ones who do the right thing even when nobody is watching. Gentility comes from God, not money.

Notes: The hag spends so long telling off her husband for being a horrible gentleman that it’s a wonder she even wanted to marry him in the first place. If she knew he would treat her like this, why bother? Did she want his wealth or something?

There are connections between the tale's prologue and the tale itself. The tale illustrates how "necessary" it is for women to rule over their husbands. The Wyf of Bath herself has had five, so she’d know, right? She basically said in the prologue that she speaks from experience, so can we infer that one of her husbands said things like this to her and she fixed it by lecturing him?

The word 'vague' seems to repeat quite a lot in descriptions of Constantia's gestures and behaviors. She reminds me of Laura from the Garden Party, having her own inner world nobody knows of. But she's more reserved and reticent, which might stem from her insecurity and dependence on her older sister's views.

This moment reminds me of the end of The Garden Party where Laura tries to explain that she has just confronted mortality and can't find any words. Similarly to Laura, I think that Constantia witnessing death in this way is causing her to recognize her own mortality, but rather than be awestruck by it, it's sending her into an existential crisis.

Reminds me of all of the readings I have had to do regarding the treatment of slaves in my US and Latin American classes. Very heavy stuff

This reminds me of a prayer we did when I was a child (as my family was Christian) - "Forgive us our transgressions, as we forgive those who transgress against us." Is this the opposite?

almost reminds me of a military barracks

It reminds me a lot of today where public pushing and protests are advocating for justice to crimes, rather than the government actively doing something about it.

Wonder why this transport of supplies failed. Reminds me of when supplies "failed" to reach Natives in earlier events when, in reality, the supplies were sold.

ugh that's so gross of the united states to go at great lengths to use violence and send the army against the Choctaws if they didn't remove. Reminds me a bit of the situation at Standing Rock not too long ago, though the US army wasn't sent in (ofc different nuances).

It reminds me of the quote "we don't inherit the land from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children"

Reminds me of the notion of "hidden transcripts." I wonder if the digital age/digital history offers more hidden transcripts to become public or if it just creates more silences through click-bait and categories such as "most relevant" or "top-rated."

This reminds me of "affluenza". where a child was acquitted for a drunk driving murder because his family was wealthy, and that because they were so wealthy he didn't know right from wrong.

This reminds me of The Heroic Slave for some reason...

This reminds me of things I've read in other papers and journals for this class where the white people talked about their slaves and said that they don't have any good talents, even thought they wouldn't have time to cultivate many talents outside of their work. Or they chastised them for enjoying simple things when they weren't working. I remember one text, it might have been from Jefferson, where he said that the slaves dident need much sleep because they stayed up late after work to do something fun. It is a dammed if they do and dammed if they don't type of thing with anything they would do.

This reminds me of just in time teaching slightly...just more rapid and structured.

This reminds me of the equisite poems we did in class bc youre able to use two poems and cobine the words from one poem with another and change meaning

This reminds me of what I am doing for my research proposal. The epigenetic variation isn't random because it happens in direct correlation to the fitness of the mother. If the mother has GDM or diabetes then the child is more at risk for developing insulin resistance due to DNA methylation.

I am currently reading a book called "Out of Mao's Shadow" and it is about the struggle for political change in China. The unkept promises made by the U.S. to the Blackfeet remind me of the promises the Chinese Communist Party made to protect the human rights of its people during the Great Leap Forward, a period in which millions of Chinese citizens starved. Cobell reminds me very much of a Chinese dissident named Lin Zhao who never gave up her principles and risked everything in order to boldly call out the party for its wrongs. I am glad that despite having to singlehandedly face off with behemoth, unfair institutions with the U.S. Government who sought to silence her at every turn, Cobell was not detained from following her conscience to the same extent as Zhao, who was forced to become a martyr at a young age.

This reminds me of a sort of classic childhood joke where your parents would hold onto money you got from a relative and you never got it back. Except this was on a much, much grander scale and the severity was much greater in magnitude.

Reminds me of the literacy tests African Americans had to take in order to vote.

I have learned of the Trail of Tears and other such Indian Removal in high school, however I have never learned of it to this extent. I think it horrible that such history has failed to be taught in schools. Furthermore, it reminds me of 1930's Germany, and the forced removal of certain ethnic groups. Yet it is not taught in the same way, when in fact they are extremely similar occurrences, and both are driven by such overt racism and cruelty.

It was definitely an excuse, but racial justification was necessary to expand and assert the new nations order. It kinda reminds me though way after, the logic and rhetoric of Nixon's war on crime reasoning in the Black community, of course both contexts have their nuances.

Which reminds me of the previous class that I took with Prof. Klann on what citizenship is/who it is granted to/how it is constructed is a theme that is involved here in this passage. Just as the US denied citizenship to Dred Scott, they did so with Native Americans by creating or using vague language to uphold racial exclusion.

This reminds me of the Eva situation. She most certainly had a brain and mind, but did that make her conscious? Her brain/mind was not human like, but rather man made. I feel as if it failed to create true thoughts and emotions, but rather made her replicate what a conscious human would do. She would never experience it however. This makes me think that replacing neurons with silicon chips would also fail to carry over true consciousness.

This reminds me of how we had to defend against if Ava was able to have the subjective experience of emotions. Did she have a "inner life of the mind"?

This reminds me of forcing things underwater just to see them shoot back up out of it with my friends when I was younger. It was funny till you're the one that got hit by it.

Reminds me of how I made ice cream in 3rd grade to try to facilitate some interest in some kind of science

This reminds me to give children the time to do this. I thing we often skip this as adults because we are expected to be efficient and productive. All to often that is pushed on to children as well.

This reminds me of an ongoing exchange between two 4yos in my context- we are exploring leaves and one boy recently expressed "The leaves are like the tree's mouth.", to which another replied "No! The roots are the tree's mouth!" This debate is ongoing and recently evolved into the latter child stating "The roots and the leaves are the tree's mouths...and they eat their own mouth!"I am thrilled to be part of this exploration and grateful for having these listening principles to guide my participation.

This reminds me of Danny Silks, "Culture of Honor: Sustaining a Supernatural Environment." It is the Christian call to return that culture back to one of honor. Namaste, which recognizes the elephant in the room, the spiritual component and influence of something outside self that shines and lights and inspires, surely will not require agreement on religion but it certainly does call forth the principle of honor which should be present in all religions. Surely we can meet there and learners, who have observed or participated in the slicing, dishonor of social media will welcome learning a more honorable way. I agree with Koch, surely, it's time. We just practiced the mutual blessing of namaste in our online writing circle and I believe it did charge our time as we moved through the PQS protocol.

reminds me of a book im reading right now

The family having three daughters with the youngest having some outstanding characteristic reminds me of a children's book I read in elementary school. If only I could remember the name of it! This seems to be trope in lots of stories though, take Cinderella for example.

This reminds me of Cinderella, with the 2 jealous step-sisters.

This reminds me of Whirling Dervishes. Dancing and dancing to come fully into the present moment/mysticism/connection with God.

Oothoon's recognitiont that her own brain is infinite is very powerful at a time when women wer told the opposite. Blake gives glimpses of how through the powerful nature of Oothoon and her self determination/ fierce desire to control her own experience. This reminds me of the courage and dtermination of Prince, who must have brought hope to many other women in her position, as she was determined to demonstrate the rights she should have against a society oppressing her.

in the PBS article they spoke how early enslaved people's farms were organic and they compost, this reminds me of that mentality.

This reminds me of what we just talked about in class about how men don't realize they have been raped because of this wrongful notion that men are supposed to enjoy sex all the time no matter what, that they want sex all time, and that it was cool that he didn't even have to try. The way that people approach this made it so the person in this story said he felt weak for not enjoying it and didn't even consider it to be rape until someone told him it actually was.

For some reason this reminds me of the term "emotional labor."

Reminds me of a relationship between a younger and older brother

There is a lot of repetition throughout this piece, and it also seems like this entire piece is composed of smaller old familiar pieces (prayer, hush little baby, etc). A lot of the phrases are all ones I've heard before, but each in their own previous story. Combining older phrases together gives them new meaning and I like that. I highlighted "We're off to never-never land" because it reminds me of Peter Pan, and I think that flying away to Neverland is the best way to describe what it's like to have a dream. Something comes in the night and takes you away from reality, to a place where anything can happen, good or bad. You fly away in the night to a new world and you can leave the old world behind. That is exactly what a dream is like in my opinion. Peter Pan definitely makes a perfect Sandman. I really do appreciate the symbolism throughout this piece.

After reading this section, it really stuck with me. My grandmother had diabetes and had to take insulin. In my previous job as a firefighter, there were many times when I got called to a medical emergency and had to help the patient administer insulin. This example not only reminds me of insulin but all medicines that doctors, nurses, medical personnel give there patients and need to know how the patient is taking to it.

1861 was the start of the Civil War. The civil war could be classified as a race war. Also an economic war. All Wars are Banker's wars. This reminds me of the first funding of Head Start. Head Start only received a small amount of federal budget funds in the 1960s and 1970s , while the Vietnam War budget received trillions.

Possibly due to my Christian background, this reminds me of King Herod sending the three wise men

Reminds me of how kids don't tend to think their creative work counts if it's done in the classroom

Here is a bit of comedy. This reads to me as the old timey looking at the camera and telling a joke. The Fool is poking fun at how Lear is losing some of his marbles, specifically his mixing up that supper is eaten in the morning. It serves as a funny joke, but also the systems in place. It reminds us that Lear is older and not at the mental capacity he once was. I am sure that some people have said that he suffers from some mental illness. That thought stays in my mind through the play: Lear does not seem to be fully there mentally, so is he at complete fault for his actions?

this reminds me of what we did for the first couple of chapter in new literacies.

Reminds me of games that have custom controls, allowing all kinds of people (like people who play one handed due to a disability) being able to join the fun as well