this reminds me of the "all lives matter" people. they feel attacked because people of color are asking for rights but they see it as anti white. ironically its a very obviously anti black lives matter because they don't say anything in regards to dehumanization of immigrants or other groups. they only feel personally attacked.

This reminds me of people speaking against protests and calling them "riots". They say that protestors shouldn't be using violence or destruction (even though the majority of the protests have been peaceful) without considering that there has never been a time in American history where poc get rights just because they want to "be nice and treat everyone the same"

this reminds me of Freire when he discussed that education in itself is political. To use critical thinking is to think for yourself and that allows you to challenge systems and form your own beliefs.

This reminds me of the medias over fixation on "perseverance porn." Stories that, rather than criticize the system in which we live in, would tell us to "pull ourselves up by our bootstraps." However our late-stage capitalism society would rather make a mockery out of those that could barely manage to survive. But all the media wants is clicks, and which overly-hopeful American wants to read a story that our society is terrible?

Reminds me of how lobbying is in the pockets of both major political parties so having actual change within our system is difficult.

reminds me of In the women's rights movement when women marched for all women's rights, but the African American women had to march behind the white women. intersectionality is a an open frame.

Reminds me of an article I read by Jean Anyon called "From Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work" which touches on curriculum differences in schools based on economic status.

this reminds me of the reading we did from freire. it takes a similar stance in the reproduction of inequality that freire did because it has the same connotation that the ones doing the teaching are the ones higher up.

In order to be reading this, someone must have already strayed from the normal path and thought for themselves. This reminds me somewhat of the "if you think then you are" idea.

Wow. Now that's a description! Bierce reminds me a little of the Romantic era with this descriptive imagery. I wonder, who inspired or influenced Bierce's writing?

This reminds me so much of the same ideas the Americans did to convice their people that God were on their side. There is a famous painting were the Americans are being led by a angel to the new land. The Native use the same aspects of religion to change the argument that god gave them this land.

This reminds me of the new Supreme Court ruling that half of the land in the state borders of Oklahoma are within a Native reservation. I hope this is something we can discuss in the future for this course.

This reminds me of many stories in the Bible where a prophet would tell the people that they had to rid themselves of the evil teachings of other nations and that once they did so, would be rewarded with some sort of return to prosperity.

It reminds me of the Ghost Dance movement. Unity through spirituality and using it as means of collective entity.

Reminds me of the food chain nets I made in fourth grade. Every time a string of the net was cut, part of the food chain fell apart.

Reminds me of the nature journal video, reading about the cycle and how it indirectly affects my lifestyle makes me more aware of how much I depend on these cycles.

Reminds me of dogs and humans. Dogs provide companionship, humans provide shelter and food.(mutualistic relationship)

call to action - building up their evidence that will support their point

• reminds me of Wall-e, humans used every resource and the earth became barren and inhabitable. Opening scene shows shots of abandoned machines and trash built up

• I agree, people think too much of themselves and their abilities. Without the functions of the Earth. Life would not be sustainable. It makes me wonder if this huge ego will be broken, will society lose trust in authority? It reminds me of what was happening in the United States when millions of college and high school students went on strikes and marches in order to stop climate change from happening which have been experienced in the recent years through hurricanes, wildfires, etc.

this reminds me of how we are presupposed to be light houses for people how are spiritually lost.

What I just read reminds me of the the articles we read for our first essay because they talk about how they had to adapt to Standard American English.

Reading this verse really reminds me of growing up and discovering what it is like to be an adult and have more responsibility.

This reminds me of the confirmation bias, which I am learning about in social psychology, which is the fact that we research things or only accept information that fits within our biases already. We only accept the information that we want to hear. Old psychologists were doing this and we have seen this, and now know that it is wrong and we can teach people today what it is and how to avoid it. Which is literally what I'm learning right now so I think that's pretty cool

love the use of the verb Hail - to welcome, support, approve - reminds me of Hail Hitler - doesn't mean its right but we are doing it

I really like this because it reminds me of the account in Isaiah 6 when Isaiah has the vision of the temple, where the angels again proclaim "holy, holy, holy". This is an important parallel because both are considered books of prophecy by the authors and both are accurate accounts that line up to each other.

This description of Jesus and the throne reminds me of the description of the Son of Man in Daniel.

This reminds me of the passage in the bible that talks about the way you should behave to your `neighbor'.

This quote to me calls back to another period in American history. This reminds me of the Republican Motherhood movement from the period of early America where women were looked at as nurturers that would teach future generations the ideals of liberty1. Women are often looked at as gentle and domesticated but they used that to their advantage when it came to politics by applying gentle pressure and persuasion on the men in their lives. When women get together, they play a pivotal role in shaping history.

The American Yawp, Chapter 7, Section 3.

It’s a very interesting reading document. Angelina is a brilliant women went forward in a fight against slavery and women’s right in those dark ages that slavery is a norm and women didn’t have same right as men. It reminds me the story of Nat Turner, same lake Angelina, he Used religious prospect to fight against slavery and equal rights for all.

I find this very relevant with today. Not many people like change but we know we must go through change to have a better future. It reminds me of how far we've come with minority rights and how people want to take those rights away because they are scared of change and may believe it is wrong. Think of abortions. We've learned from history that making abortions illegal will not stop them. Women will continue to have abortions, they just won't be safe. In countries that have abortion legal and organizations like Planned Parenthood, the abortion rates are some of the lowest ones. So why do we want to go backwards, when it seems going forward is the better option? It's because that people are scared of change. So that is why I feel like this quote is relevant even in today and back then.

This reminds me of several points from minor literature. South African literature has a great deal to do with power dynamics and the appearance of a false freedom. The part where the author said "it is exactly the kind of literature you would expect people to write from a prison" struck out to me because it describes the exact feeling of how smaller problems in major literature are the focal point of minor literature--this entrapment is people's lives.

Edwards is definitely appealing to fear in this part of his sermon. He is also creating pressure among those who are doubtful, by emphasizing that they must act quick or else they will perish in hell. In a way also being threatening. It personally reminds me of a salesperson convincing a consumer to act quick before the sale is over.

This seems to suggest that Franklin stole the diamond under the influence of opium, which is also why he forgot that he ever stole it. This also reminds me of that scene with the three indians and the little boy during the First Period, although I am not sure if the two are connected. It also finally explains the role of opium in the plot. I am not sure how this drug works, but to my knowledge this is supposed to be a pain killer. Not sure how it would make someone 'do things' without recollection, which is the only thing that confuses me about all this. Nevertheless, it would be interesting to see what else happened during the period that Franklin cannot recall, as I am sure that it will be revealed at some point later on.

The description is visualize in my mind and reminds me of several news based of that.

Reminds me of the topic and the central idea.

This reminds me of the rich horse trainer Del was talking to.

Reminds me of the saying "there's no such thing as bad press." The truthfulness of a post doesn't matter. The more controversial, the better.

This sounds like and reminds me a lot of the sentiments regarding how donald trump rose to the presidency. Political instability leads to populist and or extremist movements.

This reminds me of waking up from a really good dream expecting that it is the same in reality and then realizing it was just a dream.

this reminds me of fan theories that discuss the hidden meanings of games

This reminds me of interior design and space efficiency

This reminds me of my reflective essay...a huge factor in bringing back community is also bringing back empathy! If we cared about each other, it would be easy to be close and supportive in a community.

This reminds me of the state of crisis described in last week's reading. Developing a comfort with discordance is continually emphasized as a foundation of growth.

What a great metaphor for teaching. Also reminds me of the rules of improv - you do everything you can to support each other and find a way to keep the play going.

This is extremely important yet it's looked over so often. It reminds me of the beginning of the year when everyone is making their resolutions for improvement. Many people think they have reached their "best selves" but how can you when we are constantly growing and changing.

That is exactly what we as educators want a "hangout and learn kinda vibe" that will engage and entice students to want to lean based on their interest. This reminds me of an article from the blog Building Connections article "Connected Learning Environment Analysis which states "connected learning environments are generally characterized by a sense of shared purpose, a focus on production, and openly networked infrastructures.” That exactly what is needed self interest with social vibe win win. https://buildingconnections.blog/connected-learning-environment-analysis/

(Ito et al., 2013)

This reminds me that each child is an individual and learns at their own pace and time.

Peranakans were a very interesting and powerful group of people and had a large influence on China.

This is a win-win situation. By doing cultural rhetoric, researchers are able to benefit as well as the communities in need. As a researcher, I understand how important involving a community is. Many times, people do research to improve a community or a group years into the future. However, with cultural rhetoric, a researcher can get published but also improve communities in a short term basis.

This reminds me of an article I read about a non-profit called Carrotmob. Carrotmob buys a lot of products from certain businesses when they make socially responsible changes within their business. Essentially, the non profit rewards businesses for making proper social change. This is a win-win situation as business sell more products while improving conditions in society.

This reminds me of Frances Ellen Watkins Harper's speech to the white suffragettes, criticizing them for not standing in solidarity with the struggles of black women.

This reminds me so much of the Characteristics of White Supremacy, worship of the written word, just because it's written down on the "plan" doesn't mean it has to be done. Time, space, humans are fluid and ever changing and we need to be able to make those changes as needed.

Dialogue cannot exist, however, in the absence of a profound love for the world and for people. I choose to annotate this sentence since it inspires me a lot. It reminds me that dialogue between people is not unreasonable, it exists for love inside human's heart. Sometimes I get impatient when my mom nagging me to study hard. Now I know she talks with me because she loves her children and wants her to have a good living environment in the future.Just like Angela Davis who is full of love to this world, she argues forthrightly for "decarceration", and argues for the transformation of the society as a whole.

Dialogue further requires an intense faith in humankind, faith in their power to make and remake, to create and re-create, faith in their vocation to be more fully human (which is not the privilege of an elite, but the birthright of all). I choose this sentence because it makes me feel passioned that any problems we meet might be solved only if we have strong faith in humankind, also their power to make an remake. For instance, I used to experience school bullying when I was at grade 10. Some of my classmates always nicknamed me "pigeon" because of my appearance.It makes me feel so annoyed and I believe that dialogue is a way for me to stop it from happening again in my life.As I think they are not do it in purpose, instead, they just do not know exact ways to respect other people.Angela Davis thought that the time for the prison is approaching an end. Those immoral and cruel thing such as convict-lease system should banned and she trusts that people are able to achieve this goal.

Only dialogue, which requires critical thinking, is also capable of generating critical thinking. I choose to annotate this sentence since dialogue is really a way for people to think critically and to correct their mistakes. Different people always have various thoughts. Most of people in the society just follow what people thought before. However, there are still some people who have ability to think critically and break the rules. Dialogue might help more people to think about the issues by themselves rather than repeating other's ideas. Angela Davis is such person who have courage to break people's thinking mode and challenge the whole society to express her own view about prison.

This quote is definitely my favorite in the entire passage. It describes to me how the world is right now and what it is transitioning into. Silence is submission in the face of adversity, making change starts with a voiced idea and turns into actions. The second part about false words reminds me of the way that false news or lies prevails in making a toxic environment. The last sentence is about humans being built in word, work, and in action- reflection and in my life I've found all three of those statements to be true. This quote reminds me of Prison's are Obsolete because it talks about people being silenced and the women and men in the American prison system are completely silenced.

Another definition for "slant" is angle, and to angle is to give a specific perspective, so it seems that Dickinson is saying not to give the whole truth. The rest of the poem escapes me, but the end reminds me of a line in Kevin's Heart by rapper J. Cole. "They tell me 'What's done in the dark will find a way to shine'/ I done did so much that when you see you might go blind" It means that the truth will blind you if not revealed properly, or "gradually" as Dickinson says, and I think she is getting at the same idea in this poem.

This reminds me in elementary school when the systems of 1's, 2's, 3's and 4's were the standard and having your parents in class to talk to your teacher on why you have a 3 instead of a 4. The teacher would then reply with a general statement like the student's reading needs to get better.

This statement reminds me why we must continue learning about ourselves as teachers, researchers and our children and families. Families today are much more diverse then they were even ten years ago. This year I have more same sex couples then I had in my 20 years prior in this field. I also have one transgender parent. we must evolve with the changing times.

This reminds me of Brienne from Tarth lol

I love the way this analogy is used here! This essay opened my eyes to just how frightening the 5-paragraph essay really can be - this section reminds me of the part in the Kittle and Gallagher video where they discuss taking note of energy and passion in student writing pieces first, rather than just always going after structure, form, and grammar.

Reminds me of Curzan's "Says Who? Questioning the Rules of the English Grammar" (2009), in which she writes,

Through language, we assert our identities. And we judge others on language (873).

This reminds me of the first reading we did in class, speaking to the "new" modes of reading.

I love this idea that readers/writers of the "text" are like friends gathered around the piano in olden times in which to hear music, you had to make it. Reminds me of Matt Rubery's work on oralizations of Victorian literatur.

This work reminds me of the Oasis Social Club by Rebecca Davies https://cargocollective.com/rebeccadavies/The-Oasis-Social-Club

Perspective really matters. Reminds me of performance

I'll be curious to know what they are and what other dimensions the theory might encompass! This reminds me of Ray Puzio's CCC theory for PlanetMath.

This reminds me of the play, "The Dutchman," where a white woman lures a Black man with her sensuality, then somehow turns it onto him. The lines become blurry here because it deals with two people who have an aspect of themselves that are socially oppressed--either being a woman or being Black. It's difficult to compare this and problematic, but here it seems quite obvious that this woman is being sort of racist with her microagressions and slight, sneaky language.

What a condescending political cartoon. The entire cartoon is disturbing to see because it reminds me of the ugly part of History. Immigration is still a controversial topic of debate and will most likely stay that way without some type of reform politically and socially.

After reading this it reminds me a lot of the true crime shows about serial killers and cult leaders. The rough upbringing, the torture, and the psychosis that follows. The way he speaks about what he claims to have seen could be believable to those who seek the same comfort the person speaking does. Nat Turner speaks about what he feels called to do with such conviction that it almost consumes him. He really thinks and believes that what he has done was called upon him by "God".

I find it interesting that he specifically states here, he communicated this miraculous Spiritual communication to BOTH whites and blacks. For me that is interesting to his case. He was trying to get this message to everyone before something bad happened. That to me shows he cared for both. I still must conclude he probably had a mental illness, but I think it dissolves him somewhat of responsibility of just trying to free slaves through murders of slave owners and their families. I reminds me of Noah trying to convince people to change before God flooded the earth. I'm certain many of his religious ideals combined with mental illness made this make sense in his brain. I feel he felt he did his due-diligence in telling everyone what he was seeing and being told and felt they decided their own fate through their reactions.

I don't know why, but Godfrey reminds me of Don Giovanni... which is probably not a good sign...

rather interesting how exact both Betteredge and Clack are about dates. there's a certain amount of precision that doesn't necessarily come with their other descriptions. also reminds me of the role of diaries and documentation in the story (first encountered Penelope's diary and now Clack's) --> the role of women as keepers of stories/histories? they seem to offer some certainty as to the story being told (without the blurs of memory) but at the same time, is distorted by the voice and values of the particular narrator

This rather reminds me about the objective-subjective discussion between Franklin Blake and Betteredge in the last chapter. Subjective interpretation of objective facts?

This is false. Betteredge himself confesses during this conversation that his thoughts were "muddled" until "Mr. Franklin took them in hand, and pointed out what they ought to see". Furthermore, wasn't it Franklin who pushed Betteredge to write his recollection in the first place? Franklin's influence on the Betteredge is apparent, putting into question the reliability of his narrative as well as Franklin's motives.

It again brings up the dichotomy of opinion versus fact, subjective versus objective. This reminds me of "In a Grove" by Ryunosuke Akutagawa, which was adapted into the film "Rashomon" by Akira Kurosawa. Very similar themes and narrative structure.

The deep connection between the stone and the Indian god of the moon creates a sense of otherness and the supernatural for the readers, this whole "legend of the diamond" also reminds me a bit of Judeo-Christian traditions. Vishnu breathed life into the Diamond like God breathing life into Adam, the three Brahmin like the three Magi. I'd be interested to see as the story continues if these sorts of inter-religious elements reappear, and what they have to say.

This reminds me of how in the bible, a woman is also seen to be the root of suffering for humankind. I wonder why this is the case in these creation stories.

This reminds me of the more christian belief (stronger in the Middle Ages) that if you suffer on Earth, then you can be happy in the afterlife when you get to heaven. Did the ancient greeks also believe in this? (That is, working hard in life to get to a happy afterlife)

It seems here that this is a description of the dilemma we covered in the lecture. I actually find it so hilarious that the Ancient Greeks thought so little of women and hated them so much. It reminds me a lot of the "kill all men/hate all men" movement that most men think encompasses modern feminist. Of course, most of the women who say things like this are saying them satirically but a lot of men get really offended anyways, which is hilarious when looking at what society thought of women for so long. (I'm sure not every Ancient Greek man hated women but it is still kinda funny)

Did Zeus just not like the bones because there was no meat on them and therefore they were useless? It seems odd for bones to be considered unideal for sacrifice when it seems as though they're used often for sacrificial purposes (especially in media involving witches). Perhaps this myth is just an explication for why bones are considered sacrificial. It also reminds me of how native Americans used every part of the animal (including bones) and just their practicality over time with them being used in weapons, clothing, jewelry, etc..

Incorporation of a southern slave dialect into the text. This reminds me of how Gage relayed Truth's speech through a similar dialect. White perception of the "other" through language and the master narrative voice overpowering voices of slave figures.

Again, this reminds me of the more christian belief of working hard during life/seeking no pleasure in order to secure a spot in heaven (more prevalent in history rather than modern times). Prometheus's punishment seems to be a warning for humans; don't seek pleasure in life or you will be punished in the afterlife/by God's hand. Prometheus's actions were selfless, sacrificing himself for humankind, but if a human were to make these same actions, it would be selfish since it's benefiting themselves.

This quote reminds me of the Ghost in the Shell series, both due its similarity to the title but also the similarity of the premise. While a bit different than having a spiritual substance controlling the body, the whole premise of Ghost in the Shell is that the main character, Major Kusanagi, is just a cyberbrain (the metaphorical "Ghost") that controls a cybernetic body (the metaphorical "Machine").

This reminds me of my psychology class where we are learning about reinforcment of behaviors

This reminds me of Descartes I think, therefore I am. There was something inside of him that was allowing him the behavior to think.

I am from Toronto and this reminds me of a story a mother of young children was telling me about, where she was looking for a new place to rent. She was restricted to areas that are a) accessible to transit (but still affordable as a single mother...), and b) where stations actually have elevators for the stroller. But at that time those stations were not located near her job opportunities, just adding more challenges to her consideration of living and moving through the city as a mother.

similar to the next point the report makes below about "geographic accessibility"

very interesting and reminds me of like how the initiation to frat houses and things are very difficult so that it bonds you together

This reminds me of during our quarantine certain indrusties went up exponentially; like Netflix, exercise (equipment) and reading because all of these things help people because they distract them from the terribleness of the world.

Reminds me of the purpose behind John Krasinski's Some Good News YouTube series.

Such a rapid turn of events reminds me of how suddenly everything changed back in March with covid-19. It was the end of a "normal" school week in the middle of the month, and by the end of the weekend quarantine was in full swing.

This reminds me of the notion that a text's meaning can change every time you read it. The meaning I draw from a story usually depends on whatever is happening in my life at that specific moment.

This reminds me of the concept of ACTION Research, where an instructor works on an active project to improves his/her teaching in a current class. Action research usually only applies to the investigating team. Results are focused on a small group. Results may be published, but may not apply to a grand scale.

This statement reminds me of something like in school as a kid, if you get a bad grade or weren't behaving that day you didn't get to pick something out of a treasure chest it made you feel terrible seeing all your friends get a cool toy except you. Imagine seeing everyone being overcome with Joy when Jesus comes down, this statement grabs your attention because who ever wants to be left behind on something so amazing? No one

Every understanding of our world ultimately requires assumptions. If we remove all our assumptions (supposing this is possible), I think we would be unable to function. This reminds me of the question of if the size-weight paradox is "true" or not. It is an illusion, but it is a helpful one.

This reminds me of what I was writing about for the first essay. In the past, STEM research has been motivated with the goal of establishing dominance over others. Even if researchers are hesitant about the ethical precedents their projects will set, they are silenced with their superiors (the government) and their money.

Reminds me of how in modern-day the covid-19 pandemic has been politicized: people harbor unnecessary fear towards vaccines and masks because they feel science is a weapon meant to silence them.

reminds me of an article about Drones that I've read in 3012. The article was about how drones came about from the military and is now used worldwide.

this piece struck me as tragic as Lucky seems to be this man's personal workhorse, and Lucky is desperate to do anything to gain his approval, to keep a job or to just have Pozzo want to keep him around. I think this moment is ironic, considering one would think "why would a slave want to gain the approval of his master" similar to griffin's point. I think this as a whole reminds me of this idea of working our whole lives for someone else, 40 hr work week in the hopes of getting some illusive "American dream" or in other countries, this idea that if you give all of yourself to someone to prove how far you'll go, they'll certainly somehow find respect in you through that and want to keep you around. People are bound to system in the hopes it will serve them when the time comes, but mostly they just bare the brute of it. Even when Pozzo notices Lucky is tired he makes the other men leave him be, but he still bosses Lucky around. This is tragic in terms of how I perceive it's overall message of working for approval for a boss or someone who doesn't value you at all, and that life is inevitable in this manner.

This example of cool reminds me of the definition provided earlier. Not that it is narcissistic in anyway, but is further detached from other news sources and strays from normalcy. What makes The Onion cool is its unique approaching to presenting otherwise boring news.

This reminds me of World History in high school, where my teacher always told us wars were won and lost by the media long before the battlefield. The perception of what is going on is steered by the media, enforcing a specific view of the conflict.

Relate: This reminds me of ASLA's part in the Green New Deal. We are calling to action all Landscape Architects to implement this into our designs. It holding us accountable to try and create designs that are sustainable culturally and environmentally. It is a time of educating ourselves and people outside of the field on the effects of climate change. It is also encouraging new ideas and ways to push our past ideas to create sustainable landscapes. Similar to this passage it is saying that what we do in the field matters. The actions we make change history ,so we should be trying to change it for the better.

This idea of wastelands should be viewed as potential rather than a wasteland reminds me of the book Planting in a Post Wild World. I feel like the way he talks about Fens as a wasteland is similar of how our culture views meadows and the plants that inhabit disturbed sites. Our idea that a landscape must fit in a certain box ,and be repeated over and over we are missing out on the opportunity to create sustainable landscapes. I think testing the limits of a landscape rather than being restricted is how we can use the land in a symbiotic relationship rather than a us only receiving from nature to fit our needs.

Rainer, Thomas, and Claudia West. 2016. Planting in a Post-Wild World : Designing Plant Communities for Resilient Landscapes. Portland, Oregon Timber Press.

This reminds me of a teacher I had in high school that used competitive games as a way to get her students to learn vocabulary words-- (you could talk about this more in your paper!)

This reminds me of Padre Martinez in Taos when Lamy came. It also seems that the mandates of the Council of Trent did not make it to Brazil, or at least this part of the country.

This reminds me of the action of breathing and "free-will". We can freely choose to "STOP BREATHING". But to continue living in third density our bodies must breath and will KICK IN and automatically breath even if the brain has to make us black out to resume breathing!

this reminds me of how people say "seeing is believing." he seems to equate the seen and the unseen, saying they're both just as valid as each other despite their tangibility. if you lend your third eye to the unseen, you start to question the validity of the seen, until eventually the unseen proves the seen as vice versa.

When I was completing my rhetorical analysis - the picture helped me by giving me questions to consider and also organized those questions which made it much simpler to navigate my thought process and how I wanted to approach writing my responses.

Also reminds me of my study notes which I tend to make infographics or mind maps to help me comprehend and memorize the information better.

The author uses humor here, even the natural essence of human conversation and tendencies, to really guide this play. The interactions between characters are written almost flawlessly, and you can interpret the characters' personalities and traits by how they talk. This bit, where Kerry says "is that so" for a second time, out of habit, is very relatable. It reminds me of when I say sorry too much, and someone tells me not to say it anymore: there's nothing to be sorry for. I, in turn, respond with "sorry," and then catch myself. I wonder if there's a reason this happens so naturally in conversation, when we speak. This whole dialog has been quite entertaining, but I get the feeling something is wrong with the woman, or she has a valid reason to be talking in circles with the doctor.

This reminds me of teachers saying kids need to know the rules of grammar in order to break them. It's a provocative idea, that we need to fully understand something (students, pedagogy) to figure out how to make changes that will better serve our students.

It seems the text is saying true communities only form from pain and I am not certain if I completely agree with the statement. It reminds me of the discussion on trauma bonding from the summer sessions. I am connecting this thought to the idea of the black community as community forged through the resilience and pain of oppression rather than by culture. I feel this is dangerous statement or wording perhaps.

This quote is an interesting way to describe an illusion. How there is always more than what you perceive. How i interpret this quote is that there is always more detail and more information to everything compared to just having a first look at it. This reminds me of how we meet people. From what you perceive when you meet someone based on how they look compared to their personality after getting to know them.

This reminds me of the psychological strategy of operant conditioning which changes behaviors. After the display of a certain behavior, there is a positive or negative consequence that enforces whether the behavior is good or bad.

This reminds me of the Kakutani article "The death of truth: how we gave up on facts and ended up with Trump." People tend to seek out confirmation of their own political opinions from sources/individuals with a similar mindset as their own.

This reminds me of Johnson's point in the Quare Studies reading

This statement greatly reminds me of RBG and everything she worked and fought fro during her life. She, like this group of Black feminists, also wanted to right the wrongs of our society and prevent the further oppression of individuals based off their race, sex, sexuality, or class.

trial

Reminds me of the first admendment which is the freedom of speech.

Langston Hughes here is expressing his deep feeling by asking although the two different races have the same culture and speaking the same language and most likely have the same religion but there is a segregation and a significant gap between them. in spite of having the same pattern to dance and taste the tradition but they are not equal. In the end of the poem the reminds his white instructor that we are all American and we learn from each other and one nation, no matter what skin color we are in.

This reminds me of the phrase, "you don't know, what you don't know".

This reminds me of the phrase, "you don't know, what you don't know".

This reminds me of closed systems, pretty much the opposite of what Dan Whaley (Founder, CEO of Hypothes.is) is talking about here:

https://youtu.be/RYjOfTv0Tjs?t=603

reminds me of Beck's "Life Stories"

The inclusion of statistics also reminds me of some sort of scientific article, similarly to my last point.

I think that it's very valuable for human kind to consider knowledge and truth as relative. Considering language itself limits our communication, what we believe to be truth could potentially limit our understandings of the world. All of this philosophical talk reminds me of Plato's Allegory of the Cave in which those who live in the cave know nothing but the cave. We, as well, may rely too heavily on what we know in the world.

Reminds me of a scene in Manhattan (don't come at me for referencing Allen's work)

Two people standing in a modern art museum, it's interesting to see how this scene mocks the art form generally, but apparently, there is a little truth in it. The phrase "negative capability" seems like nonsense created as a joke.

Isaac Davis : The steel cube was brilliant?

Mary Wilke : Yes. To me it was very textual, you know what I mean? It was perfectly integrated, and it had a marvelous kind of negative capability. The rest of the stuff downstairs was bullshit.

Just a note a found this very found when I was reading this. I think Roderigo is sort of the butt of a lot of jokes throughout the play and in terms of Iago's giant master plan, his promises to Roderigo are at the bottom of the list of priorities. He's sort of forgotten and comes up later to ask why Desdemona doesn't care about him, to which Iago continues to use him like a pawn as we see her. He reminds me of Jan from the Brady Bunch (Why does Othello get all the nice drawers? Why does Othello get all the trophies? Why does Othello get Desdemona? Why does Othello get everything?)

This reminds me about how in Nepal, all the children meditate for world peace for 4 days, and worldwide crime rates are lower in this period.

Does this mean that art should be ideologically neutral, pursuing only an epistemological project that enlightens us rather than weaponising us in an ideological pursuit? If so, this reminds me of Kant's idea of disinterestedness

The culmination of the epistemological project. The was the epistemological project of art seems to loom large over art and "human consciousness" reminds me of this by Marx and Engels: "The phantoms of their brains have gotten out of their hands. They, the creators have bowed down before their creations” - The German Ideology

this reminds me of learning in elementary school that the early settlers (not the conquerers or whatever) came to America for things like religious freedom. if that's actually true and not just what young Americans are spoon-fed, then that does make them refugees. I'm so quick to demonize the early Americans, but I know there were a lot of innocent people who just wanted a better life.

It's strange to imagine us speaking like Shakespeare, would we be where we are today if we still spoke like that? Abbreviations are the most common forms of slang cuz they take less time to type and almost everyone can figure out what they mean, even my grandma knows abbreviations and uses them more than I do This reminds me of the "Monkey see, monkey do" mindset when we see ppl using new slang, like how my irl friend picked up my texting habits from my twt habits that I saw others do The short form letter way of writing is also v common, I also feel like it could've been made that way thanks to twt's low character count

This reminds me of Kamala Harris and her thoughts and ideas..

The vivid descriptions of the Titans really depicts just how forceful and deadly they were. This description of the Titans really reminds me of Fluffy, the three headed dog in the Harry Potter series. It's also really interesting how Fluffy was inspired by Cerberus from Greek Mythology. I think this just shows how many renowned fantasy movies/novels receive influence from Greek/Roman mythology.

I find the language in this text to be very bold and descriptive it very much reminds me of the Percy Jackson books I used to read as a kid.

This reminds me of Zoom calls and how easy it can be to escape a social interaction through muting and turning off your camera. It almost becomes normal to sit in silence, and I am just as guilty as everyone else, sometimes you just don't want to talk to anyone that day. However, this is still sad to think about.

Reminds me of Kant. "universal history", Ernst Bloch's 'The Principle of Hope', William Morris: "hope as pleasure in the work itself"

This reminds me of a talk I attended at Playfair Library by Alistair Hudson, director of Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art, who was promoting his idea of the 'useful museum' as 'art school for everyone'. I was impressed by his enthusiastic outlook towards full inclusivity and enjoy this quote from the following article: https://civicroleartsinquiry.gulbenkian.org.uk/resources/mima-middlesbrough-institute-of-modern-art

“all people learn together this role that art has in society of transformation. That includes cooking, gardening, politics, housing, healthcare, everything. Once you start to get that message embedded into people’s minds, that’s when you stop them saying we don’t need an art gallery any more, or we don’t need art, or we don’t need culture. Because actually you don’t choose whether you have culture or not, it’s just a question of what kind of culture you have.”

The "engage" section reminds me of our Probes. A question is posed, we reflect, we apply, we make hunches.

This part definitely reminds me of essentialism and our natural tendencies to reduce things to categories

Reminds me of the importance of kitchen scenes and still lifes in art history! Immediately thought of the Kitchen Scene by Vicenzo Campi from the 1580’s

The notion that anyone can be a part of the play alludes to the idea of "theatrum mundi". Although they are brought out as volunteers, the action of introducing them as regular people illustrates how everyone has the ability to act, and that we are all actors in some form or another. Without much guidance at all, the volunteers are able to repeat the lines without any difficulty. Although when this is performed the volunteers might be told to speak more clumsily, they are still completing their role as actors even if poorly. It also reminds the audience that behind each role is a person still managing to fool the audience into believing they are someone else. It forces the audience to adjust their expectation of theater that there is a 1:1 ratio of actor:role... instead, some actors are dudes playing dudes playing the role of other dudes (that was a Tropic Thunder reference, forgive me).

The fact that Victor asked his wife to go to bed alone confused me so much. He knew that the creature was going to visit him on his wedding night, wouldn't it be common sense to not let your new wife be left alone? I know he was concentrated on making sure the creature never even came close to either of them, yet it makes absolutely no sense to me why he would leave her alone in bed. It reminds me of horror movies when main characters do the exact thing to get themselves killed.

Again, the repetition reminds me of the elements authors use in books to grab the reader's attention. Adds more dramatic tone.

Reminds me of the "turn" we learned about with another story writing style, or the eyewitness report.

The repetition reminds me of something you'd see in an actual book. It adds an element of drama and seriousness to the tone of the article.

Why did this not happen? I feel like it isn’t the federalist system in general that are failing us— it’s the leaders of the system. Why did congress not make a playbook and create incentives for states to follow them? This reminds me of how the drinking age became 21 in every state from the funding of the highways.

This reminds me of MLK letter and his speech. A calling for peace is what both was used for

This reminds me a little of MLK. In his letter he talks about how he has broken has broken laws a a leader. Here we see that peacebuiding is something US Catholics and their leaders are trying to build on eventhough they have fallen many times to this.

this reminds me of the reading last week. I think ives was a loner (kind of like the unsocial) , like he didn't like to take photo, his taste in food, clothes, and furniture remained plain to the point of spartan throughout his life even he moved his agency to new quarters. although Ives always avoided looking like was a sensitive artist or intellectual, but I think ives was sensitive. so this is also like the psychological.

Reminds me of the philosophical journey Rene Descartes went though, trying to rationalize his beliefs from the ground up.

This horrible reality reminds me a lot of a paper I wrote about Orientalism by Edward Said in undergrad. The thesis of Orientalism (the definition relating very well to my paper/Said) "is a way of seeing that imagines, emphasizes, exaggerates and distorts differences of Arab peoples and cultures as compared to that of Europe and the U.S. It often involves seeing Arab culture as exotic, backward, uncivilized, and at times dangerous." While Orientalism is written particularly about people from middle eastern countries, the definition of Orientalism extends to the Indigenous people in this part of the book. It is very difficult/sad to read this book, but I see how important it is to be educated on the subject.

This reminds me of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development. Critical thinking can take place at any stage of learning but the problems will look different depending on the level the student is at.

This reminds me of the current day discussions on whether to distribute reparations for slavery

This idea of "Holomovement" is fascinating. Reminds me of the theological view that God is an unfolding revelation that can't be fully crystallized (exhausted) by our finite capacity.

Reminds me of my Uncle's ability (through mechanical mastery) to touch a running car and tell if it was out of tune! In the same way, God can tell where we are "out of tune" when we abide in Jesus and gives us our needed "tune-up"

This reminds me of the “perfectionist” from the white supremacy culture. What would it look like if teachers learned from children and slowed down? I think that this article is a perfect example of this.

This reminds me of my classroom. The infants are not verbal, but they are sometimes more communicative than I am. After reading Seen and Heard over the summer, my co-teacher and I observed children in the environment and let them decide their own rights in the classroom. The list is still adding up everyday. They are just as able to be a citizen in the society, as any other human being.

I love the idea of having older children interpret rights for preverbal children. It reminds me of a NAREA conference I went to a few years ago in which the speakers shared a story of a child with special rights who was afraid to go into the school's piazza. They asked the children how they could help her and they came up with many great ideas. They mentioned how taking problem about children to other children is helpful because their perspective is so much closer to that child's than that of an adult.

this reminds me of the part of the Matthewes reading where he states the prudential guidelines for war and says that all effort must have been made to resolve the conflict and failed in order for there to be just war.

This reminds me of github. Github was very unintuitive at first and didn't feel like a natural storage system to me when I started using it, but now is an extremely useful storage and collaboration tool

This reminds me of our class discussion board, Does Morality Depend on God? "Is an action right because God wills it to be done, or does God will it to be done because it's right?" I feel like this question could be applied to memories as this article states. Do we create our own thoughts, or is there a higher being that is responsible for that, therefore making our own thoughts not so much our own?

This reminds me of how in the reading of 2.3 In Doing philosophy, it says that "we can't be certain that sense experiences accurately represent the world. " (78) So we have to start being able to be comfortable in this uncertainty because it seems as though nothing is certain.

I am reading 1984 in my FYS and this line reminds me of the protagonist, WInston, and his unreliable memories of the past. The reader has the believe that Winston's memories are true but towards the end of the novel when Winston questions his sanity it makes the reader question if his memories can be taken at face value.

This reminds me of classic overthinking, being stuck in the past and analyzing behavior and decisions, a classic symptom of anxiety.

This heavily reminds me of Max Haiven's book - earlier mentioned - Art After Money, Money After Art - whereby the work practices of the artist have come to be synonymous with the practice of work in general under neoliberalism in the financialised age. Flexible working, generating hype, be a risk taker and performative hucksterism.

This statement reminds me of the dad who stole his child's right to self-expression as he chose to send him to a school to be "pushed around by other boys". Children deserve the right to express themselves freely.

This description reminds me of Wynton Marsalis

This reminds me of the traditions that surround Wicca. Wicca is one of the only modern religions I know that still celebrates and honours the elements. I wonder if their beliefs are a result or influenced by the beliefs of the ancient romans and greeks.

This reminds me of Percy Jackson because it just shows that even the gods themselves were not brought up by their parents - like the demi-gods.

This part of the passage reminds me of Hobbes and his definition of the state of war being that people are more brutish, harsh and nasty. However, it seems that people during this time were more engulfed in exploiting the earth, acquiring wealth and living in a constant war ("where friends were not safe with friends, relatives, etc..).

I thought this was a very interesting part of the text, this very much reminds me of the Percy Jackson books