What role do you think Coursetune could play here?

Si on aime la justice pour ce qu'elle est et pour sa conséquence, est-ce dire que ses effets représentent ce plaisir qu'elle donne ? Car si on voit cette conséquence comme un autre avantage qu'elle mène à sa suite, que nous ne recherchons pas la justice en elle-même mais aussi pour ses effets (que la justice soit bonne, justement appliquée : car bien que son principe est d'être juste, elle pourrait, paradoxalement, ne pas l'être), ne ferait-elle pas aussi partie de la troisième espèce de biens ?

Question: What kind of biases in classifiers?

Question: How can you actually define a style coordinate? How should I envision this?

Question: Ablation refers to the removal of an component within the AI system. Does it mean in this context that the loss will be deconstructed or something?

Question: This is a compressed representation of the image, right?

Network architecture in detail, generative model: StyleGAN2 -> question, are there possible alternatives to using StyleGAN2?

Interesting! If we were to use post-hoc explanations (think of SHAP and LIME), would you say that we intend to explain the true label, right?

Would you argue that e.g. MLP is also a deep net? I would slightly rephrase the term "deep net" and change it into something like "neural network-based classifiers".

But, related to this, I actually found quite a relevant and interesting additional paper! It happened to be published 3 days ago, and the paper basically argued that you don't neccesarily need deep convnets to solve similar societal problems - any problem that can be solved using a transformer can be solved by a MLP/CNN, and vice versa, provided that you do exhaustive tuning and use the right inductive bias. Idem ditto for RNNs!

Link to CNN paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03545 Link to RNN paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09913

are these notes from the outline still to be addresssed?

An alternate title and fits with the original. What is a bad note if you are automatically hip?

How to optimize it? How to measure if the frequency is good enough? on-resonance frequency from -3~0 ppm

• why dont they implement ethics syllabus (like GS4 of UPSC) in NEET entrance, even in PG also ?
• a doctor (who is saving life) more than civil servant (protecting lives) needs moral ethics

I was going to respond to the survey until I saw this. I am offering to provide feedback for free and yet my personal information is collected and becomes part of the sale of the business in the form of an asset. The question is why is my personal information being held for any length of time after I have completed the survey? Isn't that a violation of GDPR?

I am unsure what this is and assume it is an error? If this is an error that seems odd that no-one was checking this as it is important information about how our data is used and gathered. If there are errors here, how can we be assured that our data is safe?

Who are?

So 13C NMR do not need to use C-13 for synthesis?

How grassroots org can influence federal policy through alliances.

How did they do to develop its respective

By who?

Why it is called like that

That was the large amount. Did it make any loss to the organization ?

Is it really the disorder.

What is the inspiration to make them form it

What have they experienced before? From where and which events?

What is the cause of that destruction

Is it remarkable cause it is the biggest gathering at the time?

What make it divided

How and what make the society get nearer to the justice

Is Bastille the name of someone or sth remarkable?

What are some of the repercussIons that still continue

What make it unusual?

How can that newspaper change his life and what is it about

这里的ipfailover指的难道不就是keepalive的？我的理解是他是类似keepalive包了一层的感觉

the service是什么service

如果分配了之后这个port无法访问了呢？

vip不是keepalived创出来的？谁来负责让这个vip routable啊？

没有办法分配vip到node上？为什么？这应该部署keepalived的限制

Do not understand this.

What is the ttm dataset?

Can we have a long put and a short call ?? What is the difference between going long and buying a call ?

Doesn't it just add up to nothing ? No profit can ba generated from this, it will always be 0 ?

Biais == bearish or bullish ??

Stock vs. Index ??

Can we have a situation that is conservative both in time and price ?

Yes/No :

• cf. Fig.26.9 for Yes
• cf. Fig. 26.10 for No

=> Yes : cf. paragraph D. of page 843

Isn't there a problem if we long at a breached support ? Same for shorting a breached resisitance ? We want the price to go up for a long and down for a short so it seems to me that it's the inverse ???

Because with a small capital, one can create a large margin position => sheer capital invested is no longer significant due to leverage

???

Isn't it the inverse ? short entry taken just below/above a failed support (since we want to see price decline)?

buy stop orders place limit orders at the support, soif a lot of stop buy orders are triggered ,this places manylimit orders at support, and allows price to rebound strongly enough to pierce through the resistance

WHY??

WHY???

What is the difference between these 3 terms ?

Why do we consider the time ?

• What is a third-measure ?
• Which third-measures are they talking about?
• Is it that of stock B that they're talking about ?

i.e. Compare third-measure of stock A to that of stock B over similar durations to find which one is the more volatile ?

Why is the first measure of volatilty satisfied ?

Maybe because the time period is the "equal duration" ??

How do we pick the durations ?

• What about comparing over smaller time periods, if we do this, we'll clearly see that there are differences ?
• How do we pick the timeframe ?

Isn't it parabolic in t his example, since y'' = cte ?

Period of observation which is the band's periodicity ?

Crypto -> expiration des contrats futurs ?

Strange since it's the opposite for wedges, and wedges resemble channels quite a lot ?!

Is a rising channel bearish ?

WHY???

WHY ???

Reversal entry breakout -> return to the mean ?

Does this mean that the central line is the 67 lookback period and that we obtain the bands by fixed perccentage (here 1.3%, cf. Fig. 12.11) ?

The diagonal channel is static and not dynamic ??

How can this be when the price is also supposed to reintegrate the bandwidth ?

What is the difference between detrending and smoothing ?

• smoothing = prendre le MA d'un oscillateur. Ex. : %D = 3-period SMA of raw %K
• detrending = faire la différence entre deux MA !

WHY ???

Serious lag issue, no ?

Why 7 and not 3 as indicated page 260 ?

what does a nine-period EMA mean ??

• How do we get this formula ?
• What does the term periods actually mean ?

But we need to know future information since it is located in the middle of N bars => we need to know N/2 bars in the future. That's why there's no lag !!

WHY ???

Projection ?

will track mounts and fin boxes work together? Do they share standards?

What questions do your kids have about the Covid-19 vaccine? (n.d.). CNN. Retrieved 3 November 2021, from https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/02/us/sesame-street-covid-town-hall-questions/index.html

Extra what?

Does this mean people are paid out at a 1/2 rate? What (if anything) incentivizes people to "cash out" here? Or is the purpose to get people to keep their shares in the org?

With this kind of sponsorship, do you envision that some of the funds will go towards creating infrastructure or being piped into the DisCOs account to pay out other folks that aren't directly involved in the training process?

what if someone walks away from the process and has no desire to continue working with DisCOs?

I think this sentence helps convince people that are interested in DisCOlarships, but may disuade people interested in contributing. the "expectation" for the credits to be unfulfilled. Question that pops to mind, why track my hours if there is an expectation that nothing will ever come of it?

why not just say "quantity and quality" here?

Why is the L capitalized and not the rest of the word?

The difference between these two options is not immediately clear.

Is it that the DisCOLar path is oriented towards creating new DisCOs and the dating is oriented towards joining the mothership?

Do these templates already exist? Do we have orgs that we can pilot these templates with?

Are these organizations that have reached out to DisCO Mothership, or are these orgs that y'all feel would be good DisCOs?

What is a mirror ball?

Retracement or Expansion ?? How do we differentiate both of these ??

QUESTION : Is the paper version correct ?

diagonal -> time effect -> depends on scaling of the chart

WHY ??? Peut-être car en cas de double possibilité, on ne considère de préférence la plus petite ?

Isn't it rather an expansion where the up after point B fails and goes lower than the previous trough at B ?

expansion instead ??

moyenne mobile ?? Oui, cf. page 246

What are the current and prior larger trends ? Aren't they the same as wave degree ??

How do we determine this horizontal line for point 1 ?

???

Why ???

cf. p. 271 et Fig. 9.22

Why aren't there any waves in Fig. 9.8 ?

So when we look at peaks, the price indicates the trend when there is a disagreement between price and signal, however when it's troughs, the signal expresses the upcoming trend ???

??? https://www.dummies.com/personal-finance/investing/floor-trader-pivots-and-trend-trading/

What is the stochastic ?? Réponse : cf. page 259 ! (c'est le %K et %D)

What is the stochastic ?? Réponse : cf. page 259 ! (c'est le %K et %D)

Que dans le cas où il y a des gaps non ?

But in this case (Fig.8.7), the signals are correct ??

What is equivolume ?

???

???

If the top is marked by a blow-off in the volume chart, then the following volume candles will be of smaller size, indicating a trend reversal ?

3 takeaways from the emergence of the ‘Delta Plus’ coronavirus variant. (2021, October 27). STAT. https://www.statnews.com/2021/10/27/3-takeaways-from-the-emergence-of-the-delta-plus-coronavirus-variant/

three lines three different way to interpret. to be anything to be anything other than XXX to be anything other (is this the same as to be anything else? )

Accessing memory but failing just like trying to get a glimpse through a curtained window. Lying motionless here and now? Or when every one was afraid? Is the terrible effort the effort to access memory?

strange strange verb here; Lent to whom from the daughter?

First instance of using third person "Him"?

Liaison is not really a verb but still one can connect, one can make phonetic connection between words or social connection, often illicit, between peoples. What does this mean?

What does this mean?

Is this the foundational argument for the Supremacy Clause? For this example, does this mean if the states had the power to influence federal programs or policies, that the powers delegated to the federal government would be redundantly delegated?

What is meant by "most important designs"? Is it meant that the state governments are supposed to depend on the federal government and not vice versa? If so, that seems to go against the core contractual aspect of federalism.

What is meant by "component parts" here? Are they the states? Are they the powers given to the federal government by the Constitution?

When do state laws take effect over federal laws? How do you know when which is supreme? or vice versa?

Based on the relationship between State, banks, and General Government, is this suggesting a contradiction or non mutual relationship between the 3 in this line of argument?

Is this relationship between State, banks, and General Government rooted in reciprocity or mutual responsiblity?

Why is where the assembly took place relevant to the case and why exactly are they defending it?

This whole phrase is really confusing me? I'm not able to even figure out what any of the parts mean, could anybody help me out?

Is this something that is actively being said? If so, is this something that was yelled a little but louder? Or was this only written and capitalized for effect.

I saw "we" being mentioned throughout this whole thing but I'm still a little bit confused as to where the introductions would be. Is this just assumed or am I missing something?

Is this suggesting that if States were allowed to tax the Federal Government, would States hold power and authority over citizens outside of their state? Would State laws apply universally?

How exactly is the necessity of resorting to mean which it cannot control not compatible with the language outlined in the Constitution?

Is this suggesting that there is isn't any sort of protocol for when certain issues arise that causes question on what government has authority over said issue?

When assembling in their states, did they form permanent locations to meet or was it a random?

Is this saying that the federal government can tax the states, but the states cannot tax the federal government?

A lot of this argument seems centered around the idea that the people, via its representatives, declared the Constitution has supreme power over states. In this, a State (and by extension, representatives of the people) is arguing the apparent supremacy of the federal gov't over the state, doesn't this contradict the argument of the Supreme Court a bit, that the will of the people was for a federal gov't to hold supreme over state?

A lot of what we've read up to this point make it seem like the Supreme Court acts as a kind of voice for the Constitution, that it would interpret and enforce the objectives of it. It's never felt like a branch that was representative of the people. Does the Supreme Court ever act or treat itself as representative of the people, or does it more view itself as a representation of the Constitution?

I'm assuming he means with this line, the congress as it existed under the Articles of Confederation. My question is why bring up this quick history recap? Is it to argue that the States, in ratifying the Constitution and the new Federal government, were granting that the Federal Government held a certain amount of power of them? Something else?

Does Marshall regularly define the scope of the case like this at the start of his decisions? I don't recall anything similar in Marbury v Madison.

Does Maryland grapple with the idea that the sovereignty and power of the states comes from the people in its argument that the Constitution receives its power from the states, as opposed to the people?

What's the deal with these ellipses? Is there actual text omitted? Or did Marshall literally include these marks in his writing?

I don't understand what this is saying? So on the basis of Marylands contends it changes the meaning of what the Bank means in the constitution?? I'm not sure if I even read it correctly the end of the sentence isn't making sense to me. Changes the character of what instrument? Constitution?

What does this mean? so the bank of the united states is inherently also the supreme law of the land?

Whats the term "instrument" referring to here? the constitution? or the creation of it?

Taxation seems to be a big pinpoint of this argument. In history we have seen many problems with "taxation without representation" or misuse of taxing in this case, but we also see problems today with people not agreeing with where the tax money goes, or especially problems with getting tax returns. Do you think taxation is going to continue being a problem?

I am lost here. Is this referring to the idea that if the constitution had every subdivision of rules stated that it would not be embraced by human kind and that it would never be understood by the public? Because wouldn't a constitution with accurate details be the most accepted to the public?

While the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land, obviously the Constitution does not outline every possibility of things that happen within society (like the establishing of a bank or creating a corporation). Is the creation of something or a situation where things happen due to the lack of guidelines in the constitution common? Do you think it is fair that new rules and regulations be made in addition to there being none directly stated about these given situations?

This question is more a thought for questions. Do you think that this idea of one government have power over another government issues still stand in to days modern world? or do you think that states and governments the the US are more lacs about this issues then they where in 1819?

Is here referring to the jealousies of the states to the federal government or the federal government to the states? Who in this scenario is the jealous party leading to the creation of the 10th amendment?

For clarification is Marshal saying that since the people told the states that they wanted a federal government, that the states have to abide by the federals governments laws and rules? He pointes out that the states may see them selves as sovereign states, but since the people agree to the federal government the states also have to follow it?

Would the dependence on the states be referring to the states making money for the national government by creating the taxes?

Wouldn't that be unconstitutional? To not abide to the laws enacting by congress? Isn't it up to the Judiciary to interpret the acknowledged powers?

Is 'another government' directly referring to the state vs. the national government?

At the end of this where it states 'deduced from the nature of the objects themselves' - the objects themselves are the individual states and people in those states, correct? So if there was no mention of the laws regarding bank taxes of states in the constitution, but the grand power of the law is saved for the people, which influence the government, makes me wonder- was this creation of Maryland's bank and bank tax, at all ever voted on by the people? Or was it 'secretly' created and decided by the government of the state alone?

So here it sounds to me like it is certain that the states have sovereign power to create their laws, but wouldn't that directly conflict with the constitution being the supreme law of the land? Or is "no state is willing to allow others to control them" specifically speaking to something I'm missing?

What constitutes a case of confidence? Is Marshall saying here that the national and state governments need to just have confidence in one another that there will be no abuse of power from either end? When does the Court decide a case is to be considered a case of confidence?

This section confuses me. Is Marshall saying here that not only can the government create a national bank, but they can delegate powers to this bank for it to exercise? Or is it saying that the State of Maryland, where the bank will be established, is to delegate powers to this national bank?

If Marshall is saying what I think he is saying here, could technically any "power-move" the national government makes be considered an implied power, if not prohibited by the Constitution? Would it just depend on how the justices perceive it, at the time of the conflict?

Kind of seperate, but do federal buildings pay taxes to the state they are in? Or to the government? Or do they pay at all? If they dont does that mean that the state tax payer does?

Definitely seems like a major quote. Is he basically saying that this would give state governments the power to destroy the federal government?

"In the confidence that they will not abuse it" I feel like that is a big leap of faith to make. It seems as though states could drag an issue like this on and on, especially if they are in an opposing party than the president or something like that. Is there a sort of double jeopardy type thing to ensure this doesn't happen? or are there examples of this happening frequently?

In the Epstein text, it says that one of the seven Supreme Court Justices, Thomas Todd, did not participate in the decision. So it was unanimous, but only among 6 of the 7. I wonder why Todd didn't participate? Does anyone know from the text or other history?

This word choice seems dangerous in how vague it is. A lot of actions that a state might take could be defined as "burdening" a law enacted by Congress. Who decides what is a burden? I wonder if there have been cases that have happened since that argue over whether a state action is a "burden" to a national government function? Or if this part of Marshall's argument has ever been used as precedent for the federal government to stifle state power?

Is the "embarrassment" Marshall is referring to here the events of Shay's Rebellion? We know that the invention of Federalism was specifically an attempt to remedy the pitfalls of the Articles of Confederation, and that the Articles created a weak central government. I remember reading about Shay's Rebellion that the national government found themselves unable to fund troops to be sent to counter the Rebellion. Is that because the power to send national troops into states was not "expressly" delegated to the US government? Or are there other "embarrassments" that arose from this part of the Articles, especially seeing as Marshall made "embarrassments" plural?

I feel like this is a tad dramatic. How would allowing Maryland to tax a government institution arrest "all the measures of the Government"? I understand that taxing the bank would likely lead to the closing of that bank - but how would it interrupt the rest of our governence?

I feel like I've been lost in this paragraph. I'm not entirely sure what is trying to be said here?

Does anyone else feel that it is a stretch to say that Constitution = the government? I understand completely where they are coming from, and agree that it makes sense to have an overarching government, but this statement here feels like a stretch.

Why would hydrogen and oxygen need to be separated for?

QUESTION- this whole passage and this quote in particular took me by surprise because I was not aware of the fact that the very roads we travel on were built as a means of segregation- and it brings me to the question of what other everyday things we don't think twice about could have been originally intended as a means of separation?

QUESTION - This culture has been built in America on the basis of slavery, but has it also occurred elsewhere in the world? Most countries don't have everyone working an amount proportional to the wealth they possess, so what was the basis of this culture in other places in the world?

Employees were ‘free’ to negotiate a work contract to their liking within the context of accepting the ‘prerogatives’ of managers to organised and remunerate their efforts as they saw fit (Fox, 1974).

1( Merton et al., 1990) - used focus groups just to examine reaction to media propaganda - didn't publish.

What's the scope of PILOTs in Illinois municipalities How to explain the PILOTS in Illinois municipalities generate less revenue that what's typically seen?

Covid-19 Vaccine Resource Center. (n.d.). Https://Www.Nejm.Org. Retrieved July 19, 2021, from https://www.nejm.org/covid-vaccine

Vaccines for children: Your questions answered. (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2021, from https://www.unicef.org/parenting/health/parents-frequently-asked-questions-vaccines

I am also confused what they mean by injured in this conclusion

Similar to Taylor I am also confused on what they mean with the comment "without respect to other persons". How does this translate when it comes to the rest of the statement.

Now that Marshall observes the supreme law of the land to be the constitution, this makes me wonder how the Judiciary Act of 1789 was passed when it altered the original jurisdiction that was written in the constitution. Did the creators of the this act not consult or care about the constitution?

When deciding a case, how is being able to disregard the constitution part of judicial duty? Isn't that the backbone for making laws in this country? It the court's duty to determine if the laws are constitutional or not.

Is this saying that the court must put the Constitution first, over an act of congress? Are the principles, which are being referred to, those in the Constitution? If not, what are they?

This concludes Marshall's habit of asking questions that he proceeds to answer. Are many modern day decisions written similarly? Or is this style more suited to an early justice seeking to define the role of the court, including the types of questions a Justice should be asking and answering?

Okay help me clarify this. In this phrasing saying that if Congress gives appellate jurisdiction over the constitution witch already holds original jurisdiction than that new law or rule makes no sense?

Question: Is having a job a legal right? I understand that this case was also trying to figure out that same question.

I am a little lost in this area. Why is Madison the name on this case and not Jefferson? Is this sentence explaining that? I don't quite understand they way this is phrased.

What happened to the neighborhood after UPEN WPI interventions in Alex Penn School.

What is the longitudinal change in neighborhood characteristics as measures of effective revitalization and how do those demonstrate the effect of WPI investments from UPENN> and how does that differ from perceptions captured in previous qual studies?