Drei Klimawissenschaftlerinnen wehren sich in einem Kommentar in Nature gegen den Vorwurf, sie betrieben keine objektive Wissenschaft, weil sie ihren Schmerz angesichts der fortschreitenden Klimakrise offen kommunizieren. Gefühle seien Teil der Realität und dürften von Forschenden nicht unterdrückt werden. Gefühle auszuschließen werde vor allem von Privilegierten zur Norm erklärt, die den Folgen der Klimakrise kaum ausgesetzt seien https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/25/we-have-emotions-too-climate-scientists-respond-to-attacks-on-objectivity

Nature-Artikel: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-024-02139-3

handling inappropriate comments

The nature of asynchronous communication and interaction opens the door to true reflective thinking over time. While this type of reflection does occur in face to face courses, it does so in a different way. In the online setting, the students and instructors can easily review posts, resources, and types of interactions to then present a fully-considered opinion or reflection. Conversely in a face to face class, the students usually do not have access to all of those factors instantly the way it happens in an online course.

Again, this is not to say one is better than the other. It's to acknowledge the advantages and disadvantages of each setting.

In the face to face environment, students who are more extroverted can still engage in a manner that brings them joy and satisfaction. At the same time, students who tend to be more introverted can experience that same sense of joy and satisfaction as well.

I see the reflection aspect of the online course as being connected to the learning strategy of spaced repetition. While it can and does happen in face to face classes, it occurs in a different way in the online setting -- but the important part is that it can still occur.

I think we can take this out of this lesson.

Please change to Guided Imagery

Guided Imagery: Exploring Duality

How video's sent? Is there such a thing as chunked requests?

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/business/office-covid-preference-wristband.html

Health & Veritas: Is Long COVID One Disease or Many? (Ep. 19). (n.d.). Yale Insights. Retrieved 21 March 2022, from https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/health-veritas-is-long-covid-one-disease-or-many-ep-19

ReconfigBehSci. (2021, December 12). RT @florian_krammer: New preprint led by Kaori Sano in collaboration with @VivianaSimonLab https://medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.06.21267352v1. Convalescent individual… [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1469936301466079233

Drury, John, Guanlan Mao, Ann John, Atiya Kamal, G. James Rubin, Clifford Stott, Tushna Vandrevala, and Theresa M. Marteau. ‘Behavioural Responses to Covid-19 Health Certification: A Rapid Review’. BMC Public Health 21, no. 1 (24 June 2021): 1205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0.

Choe et al showed that rates of antibody positivity was still high after 8 months, however, neutralizing activity was only detected in 53.4% of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic participants after 8 months of infection,

Crawford et al: Neutralizing antibody titres (and total antibodies) declined an average of about 4-fold from 1 to 4 months after symptom onset.

Choe PG, Kim KH, Kang CK, et al. Antibody Responses 8 Months after Asymptomatic or Mild SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(3):928-931. doi:10.3201/eid2703.204543

Katharine H D Crawford, Adam S Dingens, Rachel Eguia, Caitlin R Wolf, Naomi Wilcox, Jennifer K Logue, Kiel Shuey, Amanda M Casto, Brooke Fiala, Samuel Wrenn, Deleah Pettie, Neil P King, Alexander L Greninger, Helen Y Chu, Jesse D Bloom, Dynamics of Neutralizing Antibody Titers in the Months After Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 223, Issue 2, 15 January 2021, Pages 197–205, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa618

Bilich et al showed that IgG and IgA antibody responses declined during the six-month follow-up, raising concerns that humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 may not provide longterm protection. Anti-S1 antibody responses decrease over time, whereas anti-nucleocapsid antibody titres persist, this is important in the context of vaccine development focusing on the induction of immune responses to the RBD of the spike protein.

Bilich T, Nelde A, Heitmann JS, Maringer Y, Roerden M, Bauer J, et al. T cell and antibody kinetics delineate SARS-CoV-2 peptides mediating long-term immune responses in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Science Translational Medicine. 2021:eabf7517.

Zhou et al showed that serum IgM and IgG, especially in patients with moderate‐to‐high levels, declined significantly between week 4 to 10 after illness onset. Paper suggests that a decline in IgM may be an indicator of virus clearance. Although IgG levels declined to low levels within 11 weeks, they remained detectable.

Figueiredo‐Campos et al quantified IgM, IgG and IgA and showed that although titres reduced, IgG antibodies remained robust with confirmed neutralisation activity for up to 6 months

Zhou W, Xu X, Chang Z, Wang H, Zhong X, Tong X, Liu T, Li Y. The dynamic changes of serum IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):924-933. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26353. Epub 2020 Sep 28. PMID: 32706425; PMCID: PMC7404900.

Figueiredo‐Campos, P., Blankenhaus, B., Mota, C., Gomes, A., Serrano, M., Ariotti, S., Costa, C., Nunes‐Cabaço, H., Mendes, A.M., Gaspar, P., Pereira‐Santos, M.C., Rodrigues, F., Condeço, J., Escoval, M.A., Santos, M., Ramirez, M., Melo‐Cristino, J., Simas, J.P., Vasconcelos, E., Afonso, Â. and Veldhoen, M. (2020), Seroprevalence of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies in COVID‐19 patients and healthy volunteers up to 6 months post disease onset. Eur. J. Immunol., 50: 2025-2040. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202048970

<small><cite class='h-cite via'>ᔥ <span class='p-author h-card'>@Currofile</span> in marina @ bliss on Twitter: "@__baileybrooks @SlackHQ This looks in line with something that https://t.co/lo2XmYayhG is building." / Twitter (<time class='dt-published'>03/09/2021 09:27:46</time>)</cite></small>

Surveys in a time of Covid [u/hamilton_ian] (2020-01-28). Reddit. Retrieved from: https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciAsk/comments/l739ru/surveys_in_a_time_of_covid/

In addition to the racism solutions, this is also a useful framing for those designing better social media interactions within the IndieWeb.

Take away: "Immune training" or bystander effects from other vaccinations may help to fight off Covid-19 or other infections, in spite of not being specific to that pathogen. Some of these effects are sex-specific.

Claim: "Somehow immunology has been blind to sex"

The evidence: This is not entirely true- there is actually a LOT of research into sex differences in the immune response, and it is well-known that women can generally mount stronger Th1-type immune responses against viral infections than men. This is thought to be partially linked to estrogen cycling, and partly due to the fact that women have 2 active copies of genes associated with immunity because those are encoded on the X chromosomes. Men only have 1 copy, and thus they don't generally mount as strong an inflammatory response. However, women are also more prone to autoimmune diseases as a consequence of having stronger inflammatory responses than men, which is seen in diseases such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus.

Sources: (https://www.nature.com/articles/nri.2016.90).

Wilkinson, Jack, Kellyn F. Arnold, Eleanor J. Murray, Maarten van Smeden, Kareem Carr, Rachel Sippy, Marc de Kamps, et al. ‘Time to Reality Check the Promises of Machine Learning-Powered Precision Medicine’. The Lancet Digital Health 0, no. 0 (16 September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30200-4.

Harper, Craig A., and Darren Rhodes. ‘Ideological Responses to the Breaking of COVID-19 Social Distancing Recommendations’, 19 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkqj6.

Harper, Craig A., and Darren Rhodes. ‘Ideological Responses to the Breaking of COVID-19 Social Distancing Recommendations’, 19 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkqj6.

Harper, Craig A., and Darren Rhodes. ‘Ideological Responses to the Breaking of COVID-19 Social Distancing Recommendations’, 19 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkqj6.

Jankovic, Ana, and Sabina Cehajic-Clancy. ‘Social and Behavioural Responses during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bosnia and Herzegovina’. Preprint. PsyArXiv, 10 June 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s83ru.

Gollust, Sarah E., Rebekah H. Nagler, and Erika Franklin Fowler. ‘The Emergence of COVID-19 in the U.S.: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis’. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. Accessed 5 June 2020. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8641506.

some thoughts when skimming through stream-of-consciousness journals like these

if I want to absorb the information and "learn" faster, then reading faster or summarising the text is not the solution, because a text is already a compressed lossy encoded form of the initial thought. to decode it further and transfer it into my head would risk too much missing bits of information.

provide display guidelines on how to present the art work.

bookmark

We welcome you to share your own answers to this question! (Opens in new window.)

Below are participant responses to the survey questions.

Click the "more" button at the bottom right corner of this annotation to see additional survey responses. You can also [view the results in a larger page] (https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/wiwgrangerized/back-matter/poll-results/). (Opens in new window)

If you see error messages in the frames below, try opening this text in another browser.

<iframe src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/wiwgrangerized/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=h5p_embed&id=18" width="958" height="790" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><script src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/app/plugins/h5p/h5p-php-library/js/h5p-resizer.js" charset="UTF-8"></script>

<iframe src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/wiwgrangerized/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=h5p_embed&id=19" width="958" height="790" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><script src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/app/plugins/h5p/h5p-php-library/js/h5p-resizer.js" charset="UTF-8"></script>

<iframe src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/wiwgrangerized/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=h5p_embed&id=20" width="958" height="424" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><script src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/app/plugins/h5p/h5p-php-library/js/h5p-resizer.js" charset="UTF-8"></script>

<iframe src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/wiwgrangerized/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=h5p_embed&id=17" width="958" height="790" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><script src="https://wisc.pb.unizin.org/app/plugins/h5p/h5p-php-library/js/h5p-resizer.js" charset="UTF-8"></script>

So sad to see that they've abrogated their responsibility for comments on their site to Twitter and Facebook

What a relief to hear this. The hardest part about writing my response was in possibly coming off too hard or painfully pedantic and not wanting to turn Cathie off in her explorations.