The role of the facilitator is really interesting to me in this context. It sort of reminds me of elements of ‘play theory’ that encourage students to lead activities, because naturally they will gravitate to what is developmentally fulfilling. Often there is an emphasis on caution above all else in a classroom, and although it’s not easy, I think there are certain points where we ought to release that control based on assessed risks and developmental stages of students. In short I think to truly be 'learner driven' we should let students break stuff sometimes, and I hope this source would agree.

This reminds me of when a social media app updates, like Instagram,and at first everyone complains and says that the update is horrible. Then, over time people get used to it and stop complaining about it.

This reminds me of the video we watched about the Flint water crisis. The residents were becoming ill but a lot of them weren't completely aware about how bad it was until later. It became a part of their normal and had to find ways to live around the problem, because there wasn't much else to do.

This reminds me of the myth of Pan Gu, who had to split the earth and sky apart, and had to push them further apart each day.

Reading this reminds me of how as a kid, I had to drink more milk to be tall and strong and had honey for when I was sick.

I love how here, humankind contains elements of the earth itself. "Fragments related to the skies", "blended with streams of rain", how beautiful! Maybe this is why we feel such a pull to nature, it's like a call back home. Also, made in the "image of the all-controlling gods" reminds me of Christianity, where it's stated that mankind is made in the image (with the breath) of God. Another correlation between two creation myths!

"First there was darkness, then there was light." is what this reminds me of. It seems a lot of the creation myths like to say that the world was born out of darkness and chaos.

This reminds me of the fall of man from the Bible

This sentence, at the end of the article stuck out to me. I really like the way the author of this article made it personal. "The divide was always there if YOU were willing to look.", the way the author put this on the reader makes you feel liable in a sense, makes you feel you should've done something about this issue. The second sentence reminds me of the phrase "equality isn't the same as equity". Just living side by side doesn't mean you have the same experiences or struggles as the others living next to you.This is moving and powerful as well.

I was intrigued by this being organized by books. It reminds me of the Bible in a way. It also has titles of each book like book one is The Argument. This is similar to the bible however the bible is titled in names.

Reminds me of how white supremacy (KKK) is not considered a terrorist group because some people don't think it's wrong to believe this

This reminds me of my experience as the oldest of immigrant parents from Mexico and learning English through school. My elementary school wanted to put me in ESL in the 1990 but my mother refused because she did not want me to be viewed as unintelligent or deficient. She told me years later that she knew I would figure English out and did not want me to be treated or viewed differently because I only knew Spanish. Not only this but at home we were only allowed to speak Spanish because my mother would say that in the U.S. to assimilate you have to leave a part of who you are, your culture and heritage and we were Mexican and always would be. For someone who was new to the country and had little education she understood this concept and how I would be perceived and she did not want that to hold me back or influence how I viewed myself. This way of thinking is very damaging to students academically and personally.

this unified thinking and analysis of prejudices reminds me of the asian philosophy of Confucianism.

This reminds me of the essay from Dr. David L Perry which discussed consciousness.

This reminds me of the other Essay by Blanchard which said "Philosophy is the interdepartmental conciliation agency, the National Labor Relations Board, or if you prefer, the World Court of the intellectual community" (Blanchard, 65)

Reminds me of the Freudian "Id".

This reminds me of what we read and discussed with localization vs. equipotentiality vs. pluripotentiality

This reminds me of the concepts of axioms in Math. There are some fundamental things that cannot be proven so they need to simply be assumed to be true in order for the rest of Math to work.

this reminds me of the when I learned about spectrums in chemistry and how they all work together through the electrical energies.

This reminds me of when my AP Lang class used this image of an iceberg. On top of the iceberg is the visible things we can observe in culture like dress and food, then below the iceberg were things like values. Relative to science, the tip of the iceberg could be science and the bottom of the iceberg is philosophy which searches for the greater depth and meaning behind what is visibly observed

This reminds me of how Japan is more poplar on making robots. I also think that legged robots are helpful and will success in the future.

It reminds me of conjecture mapping. Are we going to make the similar thing?

This reminds me of my hispanic culture. We have many family gatherings in which my grandparents would always tell us about stories and experiences they had growing up.

This is the third time that Sergeant Cuff is saying “Wait a little” to Betteredge. This phrase, although creating an aura of mystery/suspense, reminds me of the request at the beginning of the novel to the family to suspend judgment until the story is over (and thus maybe is a reminder to the reader?). However, the phrase is also kind of funny to me because at this point, “wait[ing] a little” to the audience really has the opposite effect, despite the suspense the phrase creates: instead of putting down the book and literally waiting, we actually want to keep reading. This makes me think that there might be an interesting way to measure suspense in literature (this one being some kind of technique through reverse psychology?)

I really enjoy the "dinner party mystery" trope, and am super excited to see it here. I found this scene as a whole to be extremely entertaining and humorous, and I think the campiness of the characters and the painful awkwardness of the dialogue heightened the drama and the wacky vibe of the novel. (sidenote: it reminds me of the game Clue). I also imagine that Victorian readers found this scene to be extremely entertaining and relatable, especially upper-class women who frequently hosted dinner parties.

I found this to be more-so humorous than anything. His comparison to learning to write and read in english to a foreign and difficult language, puts a frustrating visual into the readers head. reminds me of when i was a child and would pretend to read chapter books, when the words on the pages looked like alien hieroglyphics.

This reminds me of how we learned how to read as a child. As children, we memorized sight words until they became fluent. This is what he did to start to learn to read.

This reminds of a game I used to play called Kerbal Space Program. The game simulates realistic calculations and physics involved with space launch, flight, and travel. I have learned more about how difficult it is to launch crafts into space from this game alone than any other textbook could ever teach me.

This reminds me of the article https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764213479369 which I find fascinating! So much more interaction and so many more pathways between traditional media and consumer than in the past.

This reminds me of an article I read in one of my other Legal Studies courses titled "Roe Rage" -- and the notion of democratic constitutionalism. Within this realm of thought, it has been noted that an adoption of what people considered to be enumerated rights in the constitution by groups of people (in this case, conservative enclaves) have been used to provide the backlash for their own movement.

It's really interesting to see how conservatives use euphemisms to make their once "controversial" policies/beliefs sound more socially acceptable. This reminds me of J.B. White's "Law as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Law", in which White examines the central role of rhetoric (namely, diction) in composing an effective legal argument. In this piece, White advances the notion that the same legal argument can be construed in various ways, all of which convey a distinct message- all based on word choice. It would seem that conservatives, too, utilize liberalized diction to win cases and establish their policies in a socially acceptable manner.

This ideological distinction reminds me of Jazz's earlier annotation regarding conservatives using law to bolster what directly benefits them, but not necessarily everyone (the example used being that conservative Christians might espouse religious freedom, yet simultaneously be opposed to a Mosque being built in a predominantly Christian area). In this case, I see Jazz's point much more clearly, so this is some evidence of that!

This reminds me of customs and norms. In the United States where our social solidarity is very organic, it makes sense that we have this "war" on who's morals and norms are the correct ones to follow. It is interesting to think about how religious communities are turning away from the idea that they should have laws that reflect their society's morals to embracing individual rights.

This reminds me of the quote by Danto stating that "Abstract painting is not without content". I am relating Danto's quote to this sentence by Greenberg because in Greenberg's sentence he is stating that Abstract art is not necessary in the self-criticism of pictorial art. Pictures have subject matter whereas abstract paintings do not, indicating that they can not be a base line criteria for pictorial art. One is without the other.

This reminds me of how in modern America, we are now beginning to understand and criticize certain systemic issues because we can watch the issues play-out within the foundations which we have created. Legal systems, social systems, and other systems are being criticized internally by the people who must live out the systems.

I have found so many contradictions in abstract artist philosophy and their actual art, but maybe the contradictions are part of the process, and maybe that is part of my own personal process shedding the more traditional thought forms that I have, forcing me to see things differently. Like Rothko's analysis to flatness leading to transparency and simplicity, I saw this to be very contradicting to his early works were not simplistic at all. They were rather symbolic and complex, and I thought his style looked like child's play. Yet, he defended himself by conjugating the critics (like myself) by reversing the comment.<br> If the critic thought they gained a point, the artist was able to flip it, and negate it. Reminds me of algebra, to find the conjugate of 1 is -1 which equals nothing, in essence artist were able to reverse conjugate their critics, they addressed them but never resolved the citism, in math that would = 0 and nothing can exist over 0, i.e the critics had no argument to hold above the nothingness.

This reminds me of Rothko's choice to use massive canvases for his paintings, to impress a great effect upon the viewer. The result is something similar to the 19th century idea of the sublime, of being overwhelmed.

The way in which Kaprow states "sanity in art" movement is very interesting to me. When is there ever sanity in art?!? This phrase reminds me of the Academies in France in the 18th century, I can see a professor saying this and comparing academic art to that of the insane art of the modernists and avant-garde artists.

To me this seems like it is the beginning of the use for different objects inserted into art. This statement reminds me of the piece shown in one of the lectures that had sand on it to provide texture.

This instantly reminds me of censorship in many countries today. Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist, was killed in 2018 for his dissident work at The Washington Post. His work was an example of text that broke through censorship. Unlike him, most authors will oblige to how they're told to write. You always have to keep in mind when and where a text was written/published due to censorship around the world whether in a certain region or during a certain era.

The rejection of solidarity from the poor Ladino Menchú interacted with is not surprising. The colonialist powers created such a strong caste system that permeated throughout culture and family. It reminds me of the treatment of African Americans by Afro-Latino or African immigrants. There is a desire to not admit to having the same struggles as the “lowest”. I question this mentality, because if one were to align with the “lowest” and to fight for their freedoms, wouldn’t all other freedoms be included in that revolt? If the poor Ladinos were to just advocate for themselves, the indigenous people would be excluded from this fight, but if they were to fight together with the indigenous people, all of their freedoms would be given. Parallel to America, how BLM can be questioned by non-Black POC as they want to focus on their communities struggles, unaware that if they were to liberate the Black community, their liberation would come along with that.

This line really resonated with me because it reminds me of the Prison Industrial Complex that is upheld in the US, where the rich and the government work together and have carefully designed a violent system of imprisonment to punish and oppress a certain group so that the power and money is more and more concentrated within a small group at the top of the ladder. Also the way that the Indigenous people are exploited for their labor, forced out of their homes, and deceived by the government all reflect the same internal and external exploitation that occur at the hands of the US government.

This comment makes me think of my own experience during my senior year of high school. One of my friends, although joking, said "oh you'll be fine getting into a good college, you're Asian, a girl, and from Maine." This definitely made me wonder if I had had to work as hard to get where I was or if I had been given things due to my identifying traits.

This also reminds me of the school scandals and when Asain-American students sued Harvard over affirmative action last year. I didn't follow the case too closely, but I wonder how this trial affected how students viewed affirmative action, especially how white students viewed the case and what happened afterwards considering the thoughts of classmates Bailey describes.

Williams says that the selective tradition chooses cultural work-art/literature- to highlight and obscure based on the dominant ideology. Work that maintains the dominant ideology-capitalism- is generally highlighted and canonized, while work that is truly subversive is hidden and obscured. This is a somewhat unconscious process. So when we think about why we study Marlowe, and why he has been canonized we have to consider that the reason the culture keeps selecting him may be because he maintains the dominant ideological structure. This reminds me of Bartel and all of those critics from our first readings claiming that Marlowe is truly subversive. While he may have been for his own time, perhaps he isn't for ours and instead upholds our current culture of capitalist globalization.

Contextualize Water has always been using a lot in the ancient Chinese thinkers’ philosophy; everything is called wanwu (万物) in Chinese is derived from water. However, according to the different philosophers in ancient China, there are always the various meaning of water. In the reading, Confucius said, “What passes is perhaps like this: day and night it never lets up.” (1997, Allan 11). It expresses the thoughts of how time changes frequently, even it did not mention water in the saying, but it is metaphors that time is just like water; when it flows past, it will not come back. When I finished the reading, it reminds me of a saying in Analects, “The Master said, ‘The wise find pleasure in water; the virtuous find pleasure in hills. The wise are active; the virtuous are tranquil. The wise are joyful; the virtuous are long-lived.” Back in high school, when I learned this, my Chinese teacher explained this saying to us that wise and virtuous are both excellent characters that gentleman should have. However, different in different periods, a gentleman is looking for different characters. When they are young, they are more active like water, and when the gentleman gets older, they are more mature like hills. Now think back to the saying “What passes is perhaps like this: day and night it never lets up.”, I have different thoughts, time will pass by and will not come back, but the process of the time is different; it is changing by the time.

C., & Lau, D. C. (1998). The Analects (Penguin Classics) (1st ed.). Penguin Classics.

this reminds me of the idea of hedonia vs. eudaimonia -- if a person wants eudaimonia, it's harder because it takes more effort over a longer period of time

This reminds me of the process of listing out your assumptions to then question them. Are they the same?

This poem reminds me of Papa Po. He liked it when I sent it to him at the start of our first year teaching AP together.

(Pg. 260) "Each time I heard the approaching footsteps, I jumped back into bed and feigned sleep."

This reminds me of myself when I was younger. I was so passionate about and obsessed with books that on school nights I stayed up late just reading and pretended to be asleep when my dad checked on me.

pg 266 "In fact, prison enabled me to study far more intensively.." this reminds me of when I used to buy workbooks and they would make me work and study way more than normal. They were so fun and addicting workbook pages I just kept working and working, learning and learning.

This reminds me of an artists table of inspiration where a round table was made of movable rings full of nouns, verbs, and adjectives that could be manipulated and rearranged like these cards.

This sentence reminds me of the last article we read about how one cannot be an environmentalist and racist.

This reminds me of the readings from the first week when we learned all about what environmental justice is and about how in order to resolve climate issues we need to put the people who are most often adversely affected by them in a position of decision making power

This description reminds me of an article I read about how expansionists had to essentially battle swarms of locusts out west. I wonder if the difficulties of clearing out land like that reinforced industrialist ideas that clearing out the land was improving it.

This depiction kind of reminds me of the reading we did about early settlers who assumed the land to be plentiful. In this case, it's almost detrimental for them to deal with wild pigeons regularly.

This reminds me of what we talk about in class. That every student has strengths they bring to the classroom. You have to look for them.

This reminds me of this interview with a porn actress whose mission was to repeat this message to those that watch porn regularly the fact that it is not reality- what her and others in the pornography industry are showing are a fantasy, and not representative of what normal relationships and sex always look like

This reminds me of how we have freedom of speech in the U.S., but we are punished for when we speak out against the wrongdoings of this country.

This reminds me of what people now call aave, but also know as ebonics. When you can't assimilate fully, then you find a way for your community to thrive in their own way.

Here W.E.B Dubois is showcasing some arguments or disagreements between himself and Washington. Washington reminds me of Martin Luther King and his peaceful protest and mild mannerism. Washington wanted for unity within the south between the whites and African Americans by working their way up to become a superior wealthy negro and in a ways "proving" their right to be free and active in the field and strong workers in their communities. Dubois on the other hand wanted all rights legally fought for and obtained. He believed in civil rights and laws that should be followed no mater your socio-class or status. so who is correct and who is not? I would say that it's all about how you understand what's going on and your opinion on what's right and whats wrong. I say that both were successful at achieving rights for African Americans during this time just with different strategies.

Here the author is debunking a myth. This reminds me of the "little engines" you wrote last week. Most people think , but in reality__. If you have a topic that fit that engine you could adopt the organization of blog.

This is a very eloquent and poetic line... I think that Trethewey was trying to remind the audience of our own mortality and how easily our lives are affected by nature.

Social transgression (a woman acting like a man) was figured as sexual transgression

this reminds me of the readings and how the hand was considered to be masculine and manly. In the lecture video we talked about painting being a 'man's job' because it required manual labor

The idea of fluidity and shifting in the way categories shift reminds me of ideas brought up in my Intro Women's Studies course. In talking about the patriarchy, we discussed that one must look at the multiple categories people fit into within a larger, baseline category to see how some who are oppressed or minority groups can still benefit from larger systems in relation to others in one of their shared groups; For example, a straight black man will benefit from the patriarchy as a straight man, but will face oppression for being black. However, there is still male privilege because a straight black woman may be oppressed for her gender identity and her race.

This goes back to the intersectionality we discussed with the Nash reading as well. Getting into further levels of identity will show how a person can be a part of a marginalized group of people but not share the same experiences because of individuality as Ames pointed out in class, and also because of the many identity groups one may identify with. As we discussed in my Intro Women's Studies class, men generally benefit from the patriarchy but not all men have gained equally from it.

In this case, Billings is stating that although part of a marginalized group, she still benefits more than someone else may in a marginalized group because she has the social position of being highly educated and English speaking.

• Sophie W.

This reminds me of Michelle Alexander's analysis of racial inequality in her novel The New Jim Crow: a central premise of hers is that although America appears to be a more racially-equitable state, these supposed "equities" are actually constructed out of a Eurocentric model of society. Because society and its moral standards are centered on what (particularly) white men deemed morally just, if these same standards are applied to all races/ethnicities, we only have the guise of equity with the underlying fact that white people still maintain subtle control over our society. Interesting how this same idea presents itself in this article as well.

This reminds me of what Martin Luther King Jr. said in his Letter From the Birmingham Jail, "An unjust law is no law at all."

This reminds me of the idea of "moral majority" and how for hundreds of year, men were the majority of society so their morals were so prominent. Women have to convince society that their work is of equal work as men's.

1.Reminds me of a book I read. It was about a girl who was stuck in the cold for a long time.

Is Tommo attempting to attribute baby-jesus-like qualities to the Typee's beliefs? similarly this reminds me of Oronooko

Tommo describes the Typee a lot through how they compare to European/White people and civilization, as I will futher annotate, but I am curious as to why? It's probably a number of reasons. This reminds me a little of Aphra Behn's Oronooko in how it presents the abject.

Agreed. It reminds me of the Scientific Method and how most problems are address in public policy meeting. Where real life problem are mapped out and a road map is made toward a solution.

This is something that reminds me of being so personal, that science won't be able to justify all the outcomes. Some people will be able to succeed with technology at their fingertips, but then other won't be able to. Hence the can.

This statement reminds me of the videos of young children interacting with Ipads and magazines--trying in both cases to manipulate the screen and being surprised when the magazine does not work. I wonder if some of that research was used here.

This sentence and the previous paragraph reminds me of the Garland-Thomson (2002) reading and how she points to the multitude of intersectional issues that can combine with an individual's disability and affect the way that they are perceived as well as how they are treated. As the article says, Justine's presence in the BLM movement indeed is important because Thomson (2002) would infer that disabled folks, but especially disabled women, disabled queer folks, and disabled people of color are always subject to discriminations that entail eugenic programs, hate crimes, lynching, domestic violence, genocide, racial profiling, the list goes on. The article informs us that disability is often left out of police brutality and Thomson would explain that this issue and so many others like it are "legitimated by systems of representation, by collective cultural stories that shape the material world, underwrite exclusionary attitudes, inform human relations, and mold our senses of who we are" (9).

This reminds me of some information I've heard about specific races can eat more of specific foods because they have a higher tolerance to it while other races may develop chronic diseases. I remember talking about lactose, gluten, and even something in relation to grain. Not sure if it completely connects, but I was brought into that direction after reading this for sure!

Yes, it reminds me of a TED talk by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. It is about the way we draw boundaries by telling a single story of other cultures. For example, we see African is a place of poverty and disease. The truth is many cities in an African country is just as developed as cities in another continent. Telling stories like this creates stereotypes. The fact is we are not so different in the modern world.

Feel like the article is too radical. Reminds me of times reading headlines accusing the CPC's movement on border and territory issues on Wall Street Journal recently.

This reminds me of Hebrew. Remember there's something special about pronunciation in Hebrew but not so sure.

This reminds me of the Maya Angelou quote, "I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”

This reminds me of an ECE article I read criticizing the use of the word "friends" in the classroom. If we say things like, "Hurrry, your friends are all waiting for you".... Of course they are! That's what friends do! If we are their friend, that means that we are supportive, loving, willing to listen, willing to help. This helps me see how much of the child I should know personally, instead of holding back because I am their "teacher".

This reminds me of the PRL readings from last week. Relationships are such an important part of early childhood. I wonder how many of the behaviors I automatically view as disruptions are really children exploring and building relationships with their peers?

Reminds me of geometry proofs. lol

Reminds me of biases I learned in social psychology

This line stands out to me because the "wild arena" reminds me of America; where everyone is 'running' wild, going crazy mentally and physically not knowing what to do and what's next. And the "alien electric shadows" reminds me of the government and Corona virus because the government is releasing selective information to the country to make it appear as though they have everything under control when they don't. A little about me:

I was born and raised in Brooklyn

I love to draw

I like solving/ building puzzles (LEGOS)

And watching Chicago P.D.

Welcome everyone, I hope everyone has a great semester. Stay safe! :)

Hudson M.

This mindset reminds me of the idea of "Ignorance is bliss", i could say that most people dont pay attention to the changes that a lower representative may do, and if they did they would potentially have more of a say in who their representatives are.

Reminds me of the essay, "Reader, Come Back Home" which we read at the beginning of the semester -- and I do agree that as I've become more intertwined with technology, it feels like I've lost more brain cells than I have gained.

This reminds me so much of David Foster Wallace's use of subtext and physical things you can include in a written text to be inventive and keep the reader from reading left to right, top to bottom.

This reminds me of what we read from Rinaldi in The Pedagogy of Listening, "Don't steal their "why".

This section reminds me how important it is to slow down. That some of the most important work of the day is investment in the relationships. It's so easy to get busy with tasks that opportunities to build relationships are lost.

This reminds me of the article from our observation class that discussed observing the actual lives of children rather than imposing our adult interpretations of them.

reminds me of influencers on social media as well, especially seen surrounding dieting and weightloss

reminds me of a lemma or axiom in mathematical proofs, one must accept them for true if other proofs are to work

The imagery Edwards used in "Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God" though powerful now in the world we live in would've been even more revolutionary in its time. A sermon talking so much about suffering for all eternity and the idea of an unforgiving, angry God would have hit early Americans hard as a healthy life was so uncertain and the harsh New World so unforgiving. Imagine hearing this sermon after seeing most of your friends and family die from unknown disease and infection. This reminds me so much of the West borough Baptist Church's methods because it is solely meant to instill fear in people which would then "force" them into following Christianity. This would make sense as a tactic to use when expanding and trying to promote your religion and ensure that this religion "sticks" during expansion. It's jarring to read, but it obviously worked due to the amount of Christianity we see in the world today.

This statement reminds me of the Schism of 1504 that surrounded the topic of excommunication, or the cutting off of communication with God. When Pope Leo IX gave Michael Cerularius and his followers an excommunication decree because of a number of misunderstandings, it caused a schism between East and West since Michael Cerlarius was the leader of the East and Pope Leo IX was the leader of the West. I can imagine this line being said by Michael Cerlarius at that time, who seems to relate to Jonathan Edwards in a way when they both sort of started major religious movements in history. Moreover, both men had conflicts with other religious followers because of a different interpretation of several religious doctrines.

“East-West Schism.” n.d. Britannica.Com. Accessed September 3, 2020. https://www.britannica.com/event/East-West-Schism-1054.

Emily Arendt et al., “Colonial Society,” Nora Slonimsky, ed., in The American Yawp, eds. Joseph Locke and Ben Wright (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2018).

I find this paragraph strong. It is like he is saying, that one of the greatest sins of all is assuming one would be going to Heaven. He reminds the people to wake up and be humble because they are at the hands of the grace of God. This reminds me of going to church the the priest trying to instill fear in the parishioners through their sermon. Although both the priest at my church and this gentleman try to instill fear, I find Jonathan Edwards more intriguing.

This paragraph reminds me of John 3:16 for God so love the world that He gave His only Son to take away our sin. Although the preacher casts the Vengeful God to cast fear to the listeners, God in the bible has forgiven us for all our sins. Even when we are in our wicked ways, He has forgiven us, and thats how much He loves us.

I disagree with Vatican's argument because embryos do not have the five traits mentioned earlier. It reminds me of a quote from the reading on page 49 that says "What makes something a person is what it can do, not what it is made of."

I agree with this quote and I think this it relates to the neuroscience aspect of this question. It reminds me of NCC (neural correlates of consciousness). In my Intro to Psychology class we are learning about how scientists are using functional magnetic resonance imaging, which detects which regions of the brain are responsible for specific things. For example the cerebellum is the large structure that encompasses the cerebal cortex. Here is where our sensory information is processed and we are able to distinguish ourselves and the outside world. The cerebellum needs to work with other parts of the brain like the spinal cord and brains stem in order to generate the experince of consciousness.

https://www.visiblebody.com/learn/nervous/brain

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-consciousness/

This section reminds me of one of the tensions found in my philosophical health check.

"Statements 22 and 15: What is the seat of the self? ...You agreed that: Severe brain-damage can rob a person of all consciousness and selfhood. And also that: On bodily death, a person continues to exist in a non-physical form"

It can be connected to the first section as well when the author is taking about the possibility of the soul surviving after death.

This picture reminds me of the Shrovetide football with masses of people chasing and running after the ball.

Reminds me of therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ), a legal theory approach which sends this same message that offenders are people too, worthy of moral consideration. The significant practice which differentiates therapeutic jurisprudence from this seemingly act-based morality view is that unlike act-based morality, TJ often sends redeemable offenders to community courts where they receive rehabilitative treatment and are reintegrated into society (e.g. Cook County Treatment Center).

This distinction between person-centered and act-based morality perspectives reminds me of Packer's "Crime Control Model", a model in which criminals' guilt is assumed, and his contrasting "Due Process Model", which claims the opposite- innocence of the offender until proven guilty. It also reminds me of the contrast of the retributive perspective which seeks vengeance on a presumably guilty offender (more reminiscent of person-centered morality) of as well versus the restorative model, which, like the act-based morality perspective, condemns the act- not the individual.

This reminds me based on the suffering of Jesus Christ when he has to worn the throw crown and made his head bleeding

Yes! And how very difficult this can be. This reminds me of the Rinaldi chapter when she spoke of being "open to crisis."

I love this so much as it reminds me that we are all real and that education can be a more natural part of life. We strive to be respectful listeners of children's voices, but this reminds me that we need to listen to our own inner voices to, to take care of ourselves, as our connectedness and intuition will be able to guide us and, possibly, make us feel comfortable with flexibility and the unknown.

Something that I find really interesting and funny about how we classify ourselves in the Scala Naturae is that it reminds me of how we are taught to see ourselves in my religion. I am a Jain, and in Jainism, humans are seen as superior and beings that have superior cognitive and emotional abilities than animals, plants, and microorganisms. Now, even though some of this may be true as humans and sunflowers do not have the same cognitive ability, I find it fascinating that even in religion we draw this distinction between humans and animals are coherently different.

Beacon Hill: I enjoyed reading about Beacon Hill because it reminds us of the importance of community spaces as central for change. Community is so integral because there is power in numbers. At Beacon Hill, black and white people collaborated and joined forces to bring about change. Reading about Beacon Hill reminded me that we all can contribute to the cause of building a better world.

if people have some sort of freedom, they will follow the rules more than if it is just full control. this reminds me of a kid who has very strict parents - they will tend to sneak out of the house more than the kid whose parents allow them to go out.

Reminds me of Jaak Panksepp's study on rats' ultrasonic laughter.

This paragraph caught my attention because even though there is no proof or evidence of a sea monster ever existing and there are many different animals that could fit the description of the animal they claim they saw, many people are still avid believers in this mysterious "sea monster", and people still claim they saw it just 60 years ago. This reminds me of the people today that are firm believers in other things that we have no proof of existing, like mermaids, aliens, sasquatches, etc.

reminds me of how in Mcbayer's article he talks about how facts and opinions can be subjective from person to person - one's own moral code can be formed from their own opinions/beliefs, such as eating meat. Certain societies/religions belive it is morally wrong, but can it be factually wrong?

CONTEXTUALIZE:

In Reinventing Eden, it is also addressed that narratives are ideals that only address or include bits or biases. Religion and ethic give permission to address and exist with nature in different degrees of severity. (p. 36) Cicero writes in this second passage selected that the "lower animals" have no desire or concern for the harvested and cultivated. Perhaps it is the time at which he writes compared to my modern day perspective, but it seems as though this statement is avoidance of addressing the landscape these lower animals live and will continuing living on devoid of the natural resources humanity has depleted it of in production of the vines and the olives that are spoken of. Of course, just because the crop itself may be of no interest to animals, the land that the crop is being produced on is transformed and therefore affects the natural world in its entirety. It is the moral, the ethic, and the story we tell ourselves that permits us to act. It is as though we believe we are doing the right thing- which is evident especially current day.

Merchant, Carolyn. Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture. London: Psychology Press, 2004.

RELATE:

Lucretius’ On the Nature of Things (De Rerum Natura) (ca. 99-55 BCE)

As for planting and grafting, the original pattern for these operations was provided by creative nature herself, since fallen berries and acorns in due time produced swarms of seedlings beneath the trees; and this gave people the idea of entrusting slips to branches and of planting young saplings in the earth all over the countryside. Then they kept on experimenting with new methods of cultivating the little plot of land they loved, and saw wild fruits improve in the ground in response to their kindly care and coaxing. And day by day they forced the forests to retreat farther and farther up the mountains and surrender the parts below to cultivation, so that on hills and plains they might have meadows, ponds, streams, crops, and exuberant vines, and so that the distinctive gray-green zone of olives might run between, spreading over down and dale and plain. They created landscapes such as we see today—landscapes rich in delightful variety, attractively dotted with sweet fruit trees and enclosed with luxuriant plantations.

In mimicking the landscape we are able to produce and even regenerate with the hopes that our efforts can reinvent our idea of an original Eden. Lucretius' prose reminds me so much of the intimacy that is written in Carolyn Merchant's Reinventing Eden between woman and the earth, i.e. Eve and her curiosity in the serpent and in the ways and wonders of the earth. Cicero's description of agriculture seems respectful and observant of the earth in agricultural practice but never addresses the human tendency to cross the line between need and desire for more. Lucretius does, however address, human expansion for agricultural practice later in the prose which is ultimately paralleled to the fall of the Roman Empire- the overuse and the over-extraction of what Cicero is calling earth's "overabundance" in this passage.

Lucretius Carus, Titus, J. S. Watson, and John Mason Good. 1901. Lucretius on the nature of things. London: G. Bell.

These readings also remind me of my favorite book called Ishmael. Ishmael, a philosophical novel, by Daniel Quinn, was written in 1992 addressing the unspoken cultural/spiritual/ethical biases driving modern day progress, industrialization, and expansion. Quinn's book addresses the Green Belt Revolution so it is really fascinating to see how deeply rooted this battle between the ethical choice of humanity and earth is within our ancestry, or planet, and humankind in total- not just within the Western world.

This reminds me that the student's who use their behavior as a way to gain attention can feel at ease and begin to use words instead of actions to get the attention they need and are seeking from the adults the surround them. The Two- by -Ten strategy allows the child to access teacher attention without using behavior that is inappropriate in order to receive that need.

This image reminds me of the recent incantations and interpretations of the legendary Kraken sea monster tale. A couple of examples of representation of the Kraken in popular culture are the Pirates of the Caribbean series version, which greatly displays the change and detail applied to the image of the Kraken in comparison to old drawings, and the video game Sea of Thieves. Denys Montfort's drawing of the Kraken is basically a huge squid with large empty eyes. The detail in the Pirates of the Caribbean is well innovated and built upon a common stereotype that the Kraken was more colossal and more mysterious in showing its full form. This change shows that representation in popular culture will undergo many versions over time.

A lot of these things, especially this one reminds me of "college culture". It's so unintentional and happens naturally, you wouldn't even think it's wrong.

The brutality and inhumanity demonstrated by the white slave owners reflects how little they thought of black people. The unwarranted cruelty becomes somewhat of a spectacle to the crowd. This act reminds me of the tarring and feathering of tax collectors during the American Revolution, but in this case, the black people are completely innocent and undeserving of such crimes committed against them. There is absolutely no reason for such hate to be fostered and no reason for this level of hate and atrocity to exist.

The initial contact with family of an Infant report reminds me of the "Initial Parent Teacher conferences we the teachers have to complete with the first 3 days of a new child in our classrooms. This form has questions that help us understand the child better. While doing these report at work you get to know more about what goes on at home and is a time for the parents to lay their questions and concerns.

This sort of reminds me of Durkheim's views on morality, and to a degree Silver's. Parties come together with inherent values which provide the basis of laws as guardrails. It's curious to see this work out in contract law, though.

Sadly true. People say all you have to do is follow orders and comply and they won't hurt you but that is proven to not be true. Reminds me of the social worker and a disabled kid, who tried to protect him because the other couldn't understand what was going on. Even with his hands up and to the sky he was considered a threat.

This also reminds me of an article I had to read for my Intro to Environmental Analysis class. The article was titled 1491, and it was about how Western views of North and South America as places of "pristine wilderness" have tainted conservation and environmentalist views. The article states that it is very likely that the indigenous people in both North and South America altered the landscape to fit their agricultural needs. This quote that I have highlighted in Carey's article reminds me of that "pristine wilderness" myth.

This reminds me of an article I read for Intro to Environmental Analysis class. The article was about decolonizing field ecology. Both articles discuss how Western scientists tend to disregard the local people when conducting their research. As a result, scientists tend to speak for the local people without consulting them, which demeans the indigenous people.

This reminds me of the book Steal Like an Artist, which preaches that at this point nothing is original and all art is made from stealing bits and pieces of inspiration from different things that the artist has seen.

This reminds me of the Montaigne quote where he talks about how we see ourselves in different ways.

reminds me of the term inter-sectional feminism

This reminds me of the ideals of the BLM movement. Some said the looting in the BLM movement is a protest against the capitalists who take all the money.

This reminds me of what I said earlier. Girls are always told not to get raped, but men are never told not to rape.

A very interesting perspective... though POC aren't granted many freedoms, everybody, theoretically, has the freedom of speech by nature. This reminds me of slave songs, blues, and other ways that POC have defied these types of boundaries over time.

Reading about the different gods and their purposes reminds me of Greek and Roman mythology, where there is a specific god for everything imaginable.

The Marine Corps draws a distinction between positional authority and personal authority.

Reminds me of lateral leadership.

This reminds me of the Product Management interview task of coming up with a new product. You can start with a SWOT analysis, but then you'd be missing out on thinking from the customer's point of view.

Bezos calls the former the skills-forward approach, and the latter the working backwards approach.

Looking at a organization through a chaos lens would be more accurate and fruitful, but because it removes the CEO from the center (and replaces it with the system), it's not something a management consultancy would pitch (as they pitch to CEOs).

This reminds me of pharmaceutical companies not having an incentive to research a drug they cannot patent and thus cannot make a profit on.

This reminds me of the discussion from class about the law in North Carolina preventing the government from using updated climate models/maps. Increasing disclosure and making sure that scientific information is properly presented /accounted for is critical to planning for the future in a proper manner.

Really reminds me of how we speak. Some people uses polite phrases which I call them. For example, "May you pass me the spoon" vs "Give me the spoon". Sometimes our upbringings impacts us to how we speak.

reminds me of the first article from rwd1

This kind of reminds me of hysteria? Female hysteria was something that was often used to diagnose women. Any emotional outburst was seen as a symptom, so if a woman was worried or emotional about anything, it was just another medical condition symptom to ignore, rather than something to actually take seriously.

This kind of reminds me of hysteria? Female hysteria was something that was often used to diagnose women. Any emotional outburst was seen as a symptom, so if a woman was worried or emotional about anything, it was just another medical condition symptom to ignore, rather than something to actually take seriously.

Although I have only seen a couple seasons of The Vampire Diaries, the way that Elena makes Damon a better person throughout the series reminds me of the character Nathan Scott from One Tree Hill changes throughout the show. For example, he was this popular kid who had it all but then met a girl who was not popular and by being with her made became a better person.

This reminds of me of low political efficacy.

Has anyone ever seen Guillermo del Toro's "Pan's Labyrinth"? This section reminds me of a specific scene where the fawn instructs Ofelia to journey into a "monster's" lair and he tells her she cannot touch the banquet that lies before her. Not to mention, she creates her own door to the lair using a piece of chalk (creating her own crossing). The importance of journeying to a new land but maintaining a non-presence evokes the same imagery as not drinking any water where the Fire-bird lives.

This reminds me of a point made in the lecture on how woman often used manipulation to control men. I don't necessarily think Abigail Adams needs to do that with him, but this line did read a tad bit like that. Urging him to not be like his ancestors, who we all know they messed up pretty bad.

This decision is based on the mother's choice. This also reminds me of a detrimental childbirth, when sometimes the father has to make a choice on whether to save the child or the mother in birth that could kill one or the other. How is someone supposed to make that decision?

Reminds me of the heavily disputed topic of abortion

Reminds me of the topic on cliques we discussed

Interesting. I am in an anthropology class right now and we recently discussed the personification of animals in myths and religions. This reminds me of that a bit, I love the respect that Lewis has for his animals though. He believes they're worthy of his religion, I think that's quite interesting and reflective of his morality.

This reminds me of the other reading we did for INTE 2500, the one with the Computer Clubhouse. That was really a safe haven for kids and teens to mess around with technology, to understand how to use it in ways that develop you as a person and skills to use the tools that can help you grow

This sort of reminds me of the concept of "cliques." You have a "small group of people with shared interests," which is the official definition, but you also have the idea that it helps construct your identity. For instance, I was involved in theatre in high school, and so were a lot of my friends (many of whom I still keep in contact with), so that socialization sort of helped to identify me as a "theatre kid"

This is an important term that reminds me of the way that so many high-level and important members of the United States (and other as well) government go totally unidentified. Many members of the CIA hide that they are so, and there are billionaires who essentially are always off the grid because they are so wealthy and able to be above the law. We never truly can know when they are watching--the government, or the companies ran by the billionaires.

super interesting kinda reminds me of the allegory of the cave

Self sustained increase sounds good in comparison to the Spanish plantation approach of claiming a section of land and its inhabitants. It is almost creepy in a way that it seems a little fascist that would breed a group of people out of existence. Too I can see why the puritans were all about this approach especially since they clearly had something against the native peoples claiming them to be savages, and the bible has a popular scripture on the topic of having lots of children. May your quiver always be full the saying goes. I dislike this approach too for the reason it reminds me of germs. The people came to the land and immediately started breeding taking up land rapidly multiplying. I just couldn't imagine just walking into someones house and growing a family of my own in their until the one in residence had left.

This quote reminds me of the fact that we all see life differently by whatever we see with our own eyes, through the objects, materials, the surroundings and how they are viewed as. The things that we see mirror back to us as if it reflect back to us before our mind can form an understanding of it. That is what it is beautiful about, especially, when it comes to these crafts of such fairy tales that takes us to somewhere that is beyond words that cannot even describe.

This word reminds me of when we talked about rhythm and rhyme in poems. This acute on the letter "e"makes us pronounce the word so it flows with the rest of the poem.

This reminds me of the reminder in cognitive coaching to STOP guessing and filling in people's blanks if you want to be a better active listener. it's one of the hardest things to do I think! ANNNND please don't think I'm a lunatic, but it also for some reason reminds me of the hilarious scene in Men in Black where Will Smith explains why he shoots the little girl avatar in the training session lol

this poem reminds me of this thing i saw about how people have been leaving traces of themselves for all of time. i.e. cave art, hand prints, writing in concrete, leaving your name on a wall, grafiti, art, literature, graves.

Reminds me of another reading we did that discussed being in crisis and how quick we are to resist this, but ultimately this is where growth happens.

reminds me of the article "What Makes Us Laugh"

This reminds me of the math game that Dr. Lira introduced us to in learning sciences. Dragonbox Algebra. Remind me to show it during class.

This line makes me think of Dickinson trying to show how the speaker of this poem is desperately attempting to put their brain back together. It also reminds me of a puzzle. Like the speaker of the poem is putting together a poem and the pieces just don't fit. She doesn't say "puzzle" but I think that is a great metaphor for the brain. It also symbolizes how legitimately difficult it would be to put a brain back together.

the buzzing reminds me of Fahrenheit 451.

This reminds me of what I'm learning in sociology - we all put on a "performance" based on our audience and what is deemed appropriate by predetermined rules (how we act with our teacher vs. how we act with friends differs because of the positions they hold in society).

reminds me of ecology

This quote is really sad to me, but is unfortunately incredibly true. I feel as though as the years have gone on, this has gotten worse and worse. Agents and big companies signing these stars completely control and over work these people to the point of exhaustion. This reminds me of the theory about popular artists having no control over their own life down to them being able to drive a car. This specifically happened with Brittney Spears and it is a really upsetting story and if you do not know about it I definitely recommend researching more into it.

I follow the music career of Gabbie Hanna and listen to the podcast she produces, since she has gotten into music she has changed her hair retty recently. it wasn't until she mentioned it on her podcast that she changes her hair for the EP or album that is coming out, for her first EP she was blonde, the following EP she had pink hair, the last one she had green hair and now with this new album she has basically white hair. A lot of people associate her work with the color hair she has and I think that is kinda interesting. It also reminds me of the episode of Hannah Montana where she meets Iris who changes her look often and already knows what her "Next next" look will be.

This reminds me of a young adult wanting to move out of his/her parents house who is currently house hunting (Yes, this is personal)

All jokes aside this was my favorite snack as a kid. This reminds me of my environment growing up and how I didn't know things were hard for my family until I got older. I know what its like to get by even though as a child my mother never let me see the struggle. That gave me the skills I needed to make it through anything.

Reminds me of one of Milton Friedman's quotes in which he says that "History suggests that capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom"

Gosh, somebody reminds me of my past research 5 years ago.

This reminds me of how some English phrases are reversed in Spanish. For example, the phrase "Next summer" in Spanish is "El verano que viene" meaning "The summer that is coming".

This reminds me of a statement made above which stated "American voters have remained ignorant despite decades of rising education levels." I believe that everybody has the choice to be ignorant or not and unfortunately now in society a lot of people lack open-mindedness and motivation to learn and further educate themselves. Most people are living in a state of content and if we did what Brennan said and let the "hobbits" stay home on election day, we enable a ignorant society instead of encourage education for not only self betterment but to also make a positive contribution to society.

This talk of political authority reminds me of an idea in philosophy. The term 'philovictor' is used to describe someone who argues only to be right, not to learn. Those with political authority tend to do this...its as if too much power gets into the head and makes us lose sight of what is right and wrong. Being in charge should not make anyone exempt from learning and being reasonable.