This reminds me of Padre Martinez in Taos when Lamy came. It also seems that the mandates of the Council of Trent did not make it to Brazil, or at least this part of the country.

This reminds me of the action of breathing and "free-will". We can freely choose to "STOP BREATHING". But to continue living in third density our bodies must breath and will KICK IN and automatically breath even if the brain has to make us black out to resume breathing!

this reminds me of how people say "seeing is believing." he seems to equate the seen and the unseen, saying they're both just as valid as each other despite their tangibility. if you lend your third eye to the unseen, you start to question the validity of the seen, until eventually the unseen proves the seen as vice versa.

When I was completing my rhetorical analysis - the picture helped me by giving me questions to consider and also organized those questions which made it much simpler to navigate my thought process and how I wanted to approach writing my responses.

Also reminds me of my study notes which I tend to make infographics or mind maps to help me comprehend and memorize the information better.

The author uses humor here, even the natural essence of human conversation and tendencies, to really guide this play. The interactions between characters are written almost flawlessly, and you can interpret the characters' personalities and traits by how they talk. This bit, where Kerry says "is that so" for a second time, out of habit, is very relatable. It reminds me of when I say sorry too much, and someone tells me not to say it anymore: there's nothing to be sorry for. I, in turn, respond with "sorry," and then catch myself. I wonder if there's a reason this happens so naturally in conversation, when we speak. This whole dialog has been quite entertaining, but I get the feeling something is wrong with the woman, or she has a valid reason to be talking in circles with the doctor.

This reminds me of teachers saying kids need to know the rules of grammar in order to break them. It's a provocative idea, that we need to fully understand something (students, pedagogy) to figure out how to make changes that will better serve our students.

It seems the text is saying true communities only form from pain and I am not certain if I completely agree with the statement. It reminds me of the discussion on trauma bonding from the summer sessions. I am connecting this thought to the idea of the black community as community forged through the resilience and pain of oppression rather than by culture. I feel this is dangerous statement or wording perhaps.

This quote is an interesting way to describe an illusion. How there is always more than what you perceive. How i interpret this quote is that there is always more detail and more information to everything compared to just having a first look at it. This reminds me of how we meet people. From what you perceive when you meet someone based on how they look compared to their personality after getting to know them.

This reminds me of the psychological strategy of operant conditioning which changes behaviors. After the display of a certain behavior, there is a positive or negative consequence that enforces whether the behavior is good or bad.

This reminds me of the Kakutani article "The death of truth: how we gave up on facts and ended up with Trump." People tend to seek out confirmation of their own political opinions from sources/individuals with a similar mindset as their own.

This reminds me of Johnson's point in the Quare Studies reading

This statement greatly reminds me of RBG and everything she worked and fought fro during her life. She, like this group of Black feminists, also wanted to right the wrongs of our society and prevent the further oppression of individuals based off their race, sex, sexuality, or class.

trial

Reminds me of the first admendment which is the freedom of speech.

Langston Hughes here is expressing his deep feeling by asking although the two different races have the same culture and speaking the same language and most likely have the same religion but there is a segregation and a significant gap between them. in spite of having the same pattern to dance and taste the tradition but they are not equal. In the end of the poem the reminds his white instructor that we are all American and we learn from each other and one nation, no matter what skin color we are in.

This reminds me of the phrase, "you don't know, what you don't know".

This reminds me of the phrase, "you don't know, what you don't know".

This reminds me of closed systems, pretty much the opposite of what Dan Whaley (Founder, CEO of Hypothes.is) is talking about here:

https://youtu.be/RYjOfTv0Tjs?t=603

reminds me of Beck's "Life Stories"

The inclusion of statistics also reminds me of some sort of scientific article, similarly to my last point.

I think that it's very valuable for human kind to consider knowledge and truth as relative. Considering language itself limits our communication, what we believe to be truth could potentially limit our understandings of the world. All of this philosophical talk reminds me of Plato's Allegory of the Cave in which those who live in the cave know nothing but the cave. We, as well, may rely too heavily on what we know in the world.

Reminds me of a scene in Manhattan (don't come at me for referencing Allen's work)

Two people standing in a modern art museum, it's interesting to see how this scene mocks the art form generally, but apparently, there is a little truth in it. The phrase "negative capability" seems like nonsense created as a joke.

Isaac Davis : The steel cube was brilliant?

Mary Wilke : Yes. To me it was very textual, you know what I mean? It was perfectly integrated, and it had a marvelous kind of negative capability. The rest of the stuff downstairs was bullshit.

Just a note a found this very found when I was reading this. I think Roderigo is sort of the butt of a lot of jokes throughout the play and in terms of Iago's giant master plan, his promises to Roderigo are at the bottom of the list of priorities. He's sort of forgotten and comes up later to ask why Desdemona doesn't care about him, to which Iago continues to use him like a pawn as we see her. He reminds me of Jan from the Brady Bunch (Why does Othello get all the nice drawers? Why does Othello get all the trophies? Why does Othello get Desdemona? Why does Othello get everything?)

This reminds me about how in Nepal, all the children meditate for world peace for 4 days, and worldwide crime rates are lower in this period.

Does this mean that art should be ideologically neutral, pursuing only an epistemological project that enlightens us rather than weaponising us in an ideological pursuit? If so, this reminds me of Kant's idea of disinterestedness

The culmination of the epistemological project. The was the epistemological project of art seems to loom large over art and "human consciousness" reminds me of this by Marx and Engels: "The phantoms of their brains have gotten out of their hands. They, the creators have bowed down before their creations” - The German Ideology

This idea of wastelands should be viewed as potential rather than a wasteland reminds me of the book Planting in a Post Wild World. I feel like the way he talks about Fens as a wasteland is similar of how our culture views meadows and the plants that inhabit disturbed sites. Our idea that a landscape must fit in a certain box ,and be repeated over and over we are missing out on the opportunity to create sustainable landscapes. I think testing the limits of a landscape rather than being restricted is how we can use the land in a symbiotic relationship rather than a us only receiving from nature to fit our needs.

Rainer, Thomas, and Claudia West. 2016. Planting in a Post-Wild World : Designing Plant Communities for Resilient Landscapes. Portland, Oregon Timber Press.

this reminds me of learning in elementary school that the early settlers (not the conquerers or whatever) came to America for things like religious freedom. if that's actually true and not just what young Americans are spoon-fed, then that does make them refugees. I'm so quick to demonize the early Americans, but I know there were a lot of innocent people who just wanted a better life.

It's strange to imagine us speaking like Shakespeare, would we be where we are today if we still spoke like that? Abbreviations are the most common forms of slang cuz they take less time to type and almost everyone can figure out what they mean, even my grandma knows abbreviations and uses them more than I do This reminds me of the "Monkey see, monkey do" mindset when we see ppl using new slang, like how my irl friend picked up my texting habits from my twt habits that I saw others do The short form letter way of writing is also v common, I also feel like it could've been made that way thanks to twt's low character count

This reminds me of Kamala Harris and her thoughts and ideas..

The vivid descriptions of the Titans really depicts just how forceful and deadly they were. This description of the Titans really reminds me of Fluffy, the three headed dog in the Harry Potter series. It's also really interesting how Fluffy was inspired by Cerberus from Greek Mythology. I think this just shows how many renowned fantasy movies/novels receive influence from Greek/Roman mythology.

I find the language in this text to be very bold and descriptive it very much reminds me of the Percy Jackson books I used to read as a kid.

This reminds me of Zoom calls and how easy it can be to escape a social interaction through muting and turning off your camera. It almost becomes normal to sit in silence, and I am just as guilty as everyone else, sometimes you just don't want to talk to anyone that day. However, this is still sad to think about.

Reminds me of Kant. "universal history", Ernst Bloch's 'The Principle of Hope', William Morris: "hope as pleasure in the work itself"

This reminds me of a talk I attended at Playfair Library by Alistair Hudson, director of Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art, who was promoting his idea of the 'useful museum' as 'art school for everyone'. I was impressed by his enthusiastic outlook towards full inclusivity and enjoy this quote from the following article: https://civicroleartsinquiry.gulbenkian.org.uk/resources/mima-middlesbrough-institute-of-modern-art

“all people learn together this role that art has in society of transformation. That includes cooking, gardening, politics, housing, healthcare, everything. Once you start to get that message embedded into people’s minds, that’s when you stop them saying we don’t need an art gallery any more, or we don’t need art, or we don’t need culture. Because actually you don’t choose whether you have culture or not, it’s just a question of what kind of culture you have.”

The "engage" section reminds me of our Probes. A question is posed, we reflect, we apply, we make hunches.

This part definitely reminds me of essentialism and our natural tendencies to reduce things to categories

Reminds me of the importance of kitchen scenes and still lifes in art history! Immediately thought of the Kitchen Scene by Vicenzo Campi from the 1580’s

The notion that anyone can be a part of the play alludes to the idea of "theatrum mundi". Although they are brought out as volunteers, the action of introducing them as regular people illustrates how everyone has the ability to act, and that we are all actors in some form or another. Without much guidance at all, the volunteers are able to repeat the lines without any difficulty. Although when this is performed the volunteers might be told to speak more clumsily, they are still completing their role as actors even if poorly. It also reminds the audience that behind each role is a person still managing to fool the audience into believing they are someone else. It forces the audience to adjust their expectation of theater that there is a 1:1 ratio of actor:role... instead, some actors are dudes playing dudes playing the role of other dudes (that was a Tropic Thunder reference, forgive me).

The fact that Victor asked his wife to go to bed alone confused me so much. He knew that the creature was going to visit him on his wedding night, wouldn't it be common sense to not let your new wife be left alone? I know he was concentrated on making sure the creature never even came close to either of them, yet it makes absolutely no sense to me why he would leave her alone in bed. It reminds me of horror movies when main characters do the exact thing to get themselves killed.

Again, the repetition reminds me of the elements authors use in books to grab the reader's attention. Adds more dramatic tone.

Reminds me of the "turn" we learned about with another story writing style, or the eyewitness report.

The repetition reminds me of something you'd see in an actual book. It adds an element of drama and seriousness to the tone of the article.

Why did this not happen? I feel like it isn’t the federalist system in general that are failing us— it’s the leaders of the system. Why did congress not make a playbook and create incentives for states to follow them? This reminds me of how the drinking age became 21 in every state from the funding of the highways.

This reminds me of MLK letter and his speech. A calling for peace is what both was used for

This reminds me a little of MLK. In his letter he talks about how he has broken has broken laws a a leader. Here we see that peacebuiding is something US Catholics and their leaders are trying to build on eventhough they have fallen many times to this.

this reminds me of the reading last week. I think ives was a loner (kind of like the unsocial) , like he didn't like to take photo, his taste in food, clothes, and furniture remained plain to the point of spartan throughout his life even he moved his agency to new quarters. although Ives always avoided looking like was a sensitive artist or intellectual, but I think ives was sensitive. so this is also like the psychological.

Reminds me of the philosophical journey Rene Descartes went though, trying to rationalize his beliefs from the ground up.

This horrible reality reminds me a lot of a paper I wrote about Orientalism by Edward Said in undergrad. The thesis of Orientalism (the definition relating very well to my paper/Said) "is a way of seeing that imagines, emphasizes, exaggerates and distorts differences of Arab peoples and cultures as compared to that of Europe and the U.S. It often involves seeing Arab culture as exotic, backward, uncivilized, and at times dangerous." While Orientalism is written particularly about people from middle eastern countries, the definition of Orientalism extends to the Indigenous people in this part of the book. It is very difficult/sad to read this book, but I see how important it is to be educated on the subject.

This reminds me of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development. Critical thinking can take place at any stage of learning but the problems will look different depending on the level the student is at.

This reminds me of the current day discussions on whether to distribute reparations for slavery

This idea of "Holomovement" is fascinating. Reminds me of the theological view that God is an unfolding revelation that can't be fully crystallized (exhausted) by our finite capacity.

Reminds me of my Uncle's ability (through mechanical mastery) to touch a running car and tell if it was out of tune! In the same way, God can tell where we are "out of tune" when we abide in Jesus and gives us our needed "tune-up"

This reminds me of the “perfectionist” from the white supremacy culture. What would it look like if teachers learned from children and slowed down? I think that this article is a perfect example of this.

This reminds me of my classroom. The infants are not verbal, but they are sometimes more communicative than I am. After reading Seen and Heard over the summer, my co-teacher and I observed children in the environment and let them decide their own rights in the classroom. The list is still adding up everyday. They are just as able to be a citizen in the society, as any other human being.

I love the idea of having older children interpret rights for preverbal children. It reminds me of a NAREA conference I went to a few years ago in which the speakers shared a story of a child with special rights who was afraid to go into the school's piazza. They asked the children how they could help her and they came up with many great ideas. They mentioned how taking problem about children to other children is helpful because their perspective is so much closer to that child's than that of an adult.

this reminds me of the part of the Matthewes reading where he states the prudential guidelines for war and says that all effort must have been made to resolve the conflict and failed in order for there to be just war.

This reminds me of github. Github was very unintuitive at first and didn't feel like a natural storage system to me when I started using it, but now is an extremely useful storage and collaboration tool

This reminds me of our class discussion board, Does Morality Depend on God? "Is an action right because God wills it to be done, or does God will it to be done because it's right?" I feel like this question could be applied to memories as this article states. Do we create our own thoughts, or is there a higher being that is responsible for that, therefore making our own thoughts not so much our own?

This reminds me of how in the reading of 2.3 In Doing philosophy, it says that "we can't be certain that sense experiences accurately represent the world. " (78) So we have to start being able to be comfortable in this uncertainty because it seems as though nothing is certain.

I am reading 1984 in my FYS and this line reminds me of the protagonist, WInston, and his unreliable memories of the past. The reader has the believe that Winston's memories are true but towards the end of the novel when Winston questions his sanity it makes the reader question if his memories can be taken at face value.

This reminds me of classic overthinking, being stuck in the past and analyzing behavior and decisions, a classic symptom of anxiety.

This heavily reminds me of Max Haiven's book - earlier mentioned - Art After Money, Money After Art - whereby the work practices of the artist have come to be synonymous with the practice of work in general under neoliberalism in the financialised age. Flexible working, generating hype, be a risk taker and performative hucksterism.

This statement reminds me of the dad who stole his child's right to self-expression as he chose to send him to a school to be "pushed around by other boys". Children deserve the right to express themselves freely.

This description reminds me of Wynton Marsalis

This reminds me of the traditions that surround Wicca. Wicca is one of the only modern religions I know that still celebrates and honours the elements. I wonder if their beliefs are a result or influenced by the beliefs of the ancient romans and greeks.

This reminds me of Percy Jackson because it just shows that even the gods themselves were not brought up by their parents - like the demi-gods.

This part of the passage reminds me of Hobbes and his definition of the state of war being that people are more brutish, harsh and nasty. However, it seems that people during this time were more engulfed in exploiting the earth, acquiring wealth and living in a constant war ("where friends were not safe with friends, relatives, etc..).

I thought this was a very interesting part of the text, this very much reminds me of the Percy Jackson books

This reminds me of the myth of Pan Gu, who had to split the earth and sky apart, and had to push them further apart each day.

Reading this reminds me of how as a kid, I had to drink more milk to be tall and strong and had honey for when I was sick.

I love how here, humankind contains elements of the earth itself. "Fragments related to the skies", "blended with streams of rain", how beautiful! Maybe this is why we feel such a pull to nature, it's like a call back home. Also, made in the "image of the all-controlling gods" reminds me of Christianity, where it's stated that mankind is made in the image (with the breath) of God. Another correlation between two creation myths!

"First there was darkness, then there was light." is what this reminds me of. It seems a lot of the creation myths like to say that the world was born out of darkness and chaos.

This reminds me of the fall of man from the Bible

this keyword, "growth," sounds like a connotation of 'organic' or 'natural,' and juxtaposed to the keyword "artificial," it reminds me of the opening line of Chapter 1: "Mankind likes to think in terms of extreme opposites."

Can you remember seeing this theme of Growth/Living vs. Artificial/Manufactured in other readings from this unit?

Music is a motif that stands out to me in this poem. Even the title, I believe, is a play on the musical terminology of movement. The syntax reminds me of stream of consciousness writing, how it just comes out like vomit. For example, in lines 10 and 11, “Wherever always we are/ Crowds the sea upon us/” The word order in these lines is a bit strange to me. How is the author using words and themes in this poem? What kinds of figurative language are used? Upon first glance, it looks like a jumble of words. Is there order in this chaos?

very interesting take on how a regime can manipulate the right to vote to influence the people, and more than ever reminds me of the time in america where the majority of the country's population couldn't vote (including, but not limited to black citizens and women).

This shows that race is not the predominant factor when companies/individuals make a decision, but name is still important as it's the first thing that people see before meeting in person. It provides some background information on the applicants. This also reminds me of signing up for different discussion groups in middle school, I also felt more secure when I see names that sound culturally familiar to me.

This happens more commonly than we know. Sometimes it's easier to process information than expressing it. This reminds me of emotions. We know what we're feeling, but it's just very difficult knowing how to express it. Feelings are complex like words.

This reminds me of how me and my friends have our own spanglish language and sometimes I use is with my non spanish speaking friends and I would have to repeat myself in English.

This reminds me of a term that I learned in psych class last year. I learned that when people see something happening that they could help with or could stop from happening and they choose not to help because they are 'following others,' this is the bystander effect. Simply put, people are less likely to offer help when others are present, (https://www.britannica.com/topic/bystander-effect). In this case, when we see others that we respect not doing anything to stop obvious injustice, it is easier for us to do the same. If more people started taking action, more good and more help would probably be offered.

This reminds me of how there are certain vowel sounds in German that we as English speakers can't hear or make as well (ü), and similarly there are consonant sounds in English that German speakers cannot easily hear or produce (w). p. 6

This reminds me of our small group discussion on safety.

I appreciate this distinction between "okay" and "a right". It reminds me of the time my mentor cautioned me against adding an "okay" to the end of a statement, "lets do a potty try, okay.. To me it was just a way of speaking but with children it turned into a question.

This reminds me of the concept of a think-tank. Lots of brains and perspectives making innovation happen.

This reminds me of a beautiful children's book "Wait" by Antoinette Portis

This reminds me of a story that I heard about the world being designed for right handed people. So many instances of ableism in our world!

Respond: This reminds me of Chinese agriculture where they use terracing to help improve their practices. It would be interesting to see how much more they were able to cultivate compared to the other available land? I think it would also be interesting to see how these terraces were assembled, because from some of the pictures its hard to understand how all of it was done by hand?

Agree! poverty is essentially the issue at the core. This reminds me of food stamps, people sell or exchange their food stamps for cash in order to buy other things they need or want (sometimes alcohol or drugs).

This reminds me of 'The Pedagogy of Listening' and how it is important for us to tune in to both the verbal and non-verbal forms of communication. I am also reminded of something Suzanne Axelson shared at a play summit recently, that we advocate for children to have a voice, but this will only happen when adults truly listen. When we listen, children will have a voice.

I like the way she puts out imagery and food language in this story. It reminds me of my aunt who lives so far from me.

This quote reminds me of how people are being treated. In the USA, working people are not getting equal pay because of their race. I feel that everyone should be treated fairly, no matter what language they speak. I mean, people can learn languages from others, but I really don't think it is right to tell people to go back to their country just because they can't speak the same language as others.

I've noticed this when learning Italian that lots of words were masculine even if there was a woman involved. Also with English, it reminds me of how married women usually take their husband's last name. Why?

This reminds me of how we have freedom of speech in the U.S., but we are punished for when we speak out against the wrongdoings of this country.

This reminds me of what people now call aave, but also know as ebonics. When you can't assimilate fully, then you find a way for your community to thrive in their own way.

Is coming into sanity and into terms of what one can understand and of what one is sure of. In that it gives enough peace in. one's self and existence

This reminds me of the Darwin theory where the rich celebrated where they felt it was a survival of the fittest that they had what they had. I like Long's proposal for equality and how he ties it back to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in his platform. By this time, America had gone through so much change, with the industrial boom, with new inventions, I admire his heart for wanting to see people being given an equal chance.

This reminds me of the Robin Hood Act in Texas that went into effect in the early 1990s. Schools that had more money from property taxes, etc. were told they cannot keep it. It was then taken, and shared with others.

This reminds me of modern day Latin America as well. Printing money makes it practically impossible to invest in anything because the currency is constantly crashing. People, especially in Argentina, won't buy houses and instead will only rent apartments because both the currency as well as the housing markets are too unstable to invest in. The currency, like the currency in the 1800s, can fall too fast, making the investors automatically lose money. For example, if you bought a house for 300,000 pesos when the currency was 1 to 1 with US dollars and then the currency all of the sudden was 5 to 1 with US dollars, the 300,000 peso house you just bought is suddenly worth a lot less money. The price will eventually readjust itself to a certain degree, but that will take time. You also have to consider that if someone wanted to buy your house and had 300,000 pesos, they now need to have 1.5 million to keep up with the conversion rate. This makes it very difficult to sell houses because each time the currency crashes, a smaller and smaller percentage of the population can actually afford the house. Peoples' salaries will adjust eventually, but again that takes a lot of time and doesn't always happen. Additionally the housing market itself is unpredictable unless you buy a house / apartment near an enormous urban center. I wonder how much of using printing money as a crutch to solve financial problems has influenced modern day fiscal policy in Latin America. Has it also been a way for the government to ignore the debt and financial crisis created by mass expenditures the government cannot pay for? Reading more about the state of Latin America in the 19th and 20th centuries I think is really solidifying for me how much Latin America has changed but more importantly how it has stayed the same.

pg 262 "I never will forget how shocked when I was when I began reading about slavery's total horror. It made such an impact upon me that it later became one of my favorite subjects.." This reminds me of the TED talk we watched. The fact that he didn't know about slavery in books until he read about it. Similar to how she didn't know about Africans in books until later on

(Pg. 260) "Each time I heard the approaching footsteps, I jumped back into bed and feigned sleep."

This reminds me of myself when I was younger. I was so passionate about and obsessed with books that on school nights I stayed up late just reading and pretended to be asleep when my dad checked on me.

pg 266 "In fact, prison enabled me to study far more intensively.." this reminds me of when I used to buy workbooks and they would make me work and study way more than normal. They were so fun and addicting workbook pages I just kept working and working, learning and learning.

This rather reminds me about the objective-subjective discussion between Franklin Blake and Betteredge in the last chapter. Subjective interpretation of objective facts?

This is false. Betteredge himself confesses during this conversation that his thoughts were "muddled" until "Mr. Franklin took them in hand, and pointed out what they ought to see". Furthermore, wasn't it Franklin who pushed Betteredge to write his recollection in the first place? Franklin's influence on the Betteredge is apparent, putting into question the reliability of his narrative as well as Franklin's motives.

It again brings up the dichotomy of opinion versus fact, subjective versus objective. This reminds me of "In a Grove" by Ryunosuke Akutagawa, which was adapted into the film "Rashomon" by Akira Kurosawa. Very similar themes and narrative structure.

The deep connection between the stone and the Indian god of the moon creates a sense of otherness and the supernatural for the readers, this whole "legend of the diamond" also reminds me a bit of Judeo-Christian traditions. Vishnu breathed life into the Diamond like God breathing life into Adam, the three Brahmin like the three Magi. I'd be interested to see as the story continues if these sorts of inter-religious elements reappear, and what they have to say.

This is the third time that Sergeant Cuff is saying “Wait a little” to Betteredge. This phrase, although creating an aura of mystery/suspense, reminds me of the request at the beginning of the novel to the family to suspend judgment until the story is over (and thus maybe is a reminder to the reader?). However, the phrase is also kind of funny to me because at this point, “wait[ing] a little” to the audience really has the opposite effect, despite the suspense the phrase creates: instead of putting down the book and literally waiting, we actually want to keep reading. This makes me think that there might be an interesting way to measure suspense in literature (this one being some kind of technique through reverse psychology?)

I really enjoy the "dinner party mystery" trope, and am super excited to see it here. I found this scene as a whole to be extremely entertaining and humorous, and I think the campiness of the characters and the painful awkwardness of the dialogue heightened the drama and the wacky vibe of the novel. (sidenote: it reminds me of the game Clue). I also imagine that Victorian readers found this scene to be extremely entertaining and relatable, especially upper-class women who frequently hosted dinner parties.

On the internet, even micro-niches are huge. You can benefit from this by writing online and attracting like minded individuals- reminds me of David Perell's idea of 'audience-first products'. Plus, going back to the earlier point of amassing assets that earn while you sleep, your writing basically networks for you while you sleep by putting a signal out into the world and connecting you with the people with whom your ideas resonate most deeply

The role of CPS is strategic in that it is pushing communities of color to do the labor and threatening them that if they don't continue to do so, they will intervene and impose their own agenda.

This reminds me of the labor that communities of color do to collective and organize. Burn out is so real and this is why a community of care is so important. We must look out for one another and ensure that everyone is also prioritizing their mental wellbeing in the process of working towards racial justice and equality. We must create communal processes that are sustainable for the movement.

When speaking of reform, this passage reminds me of Audre Lorde's "The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House" in which systems of power cannot be dismantled when using the tools of the oppressor. Reform pushes for change WITHIN a system, rather than destroying the oppressive system itself.

As Gabi has said, I agree that there needs to be an abolition of schools. I know that David Stovall works on school abolition as well as CRT.

This line reminds me of the part where her mother cried. how tears can be misunderstood and the grief associate with them. The sort of feelings she may have started to realized and understand now that she's in difficult situation where she feels lonely and misunderstood. A sad realization of how her own mother felt as she too misses her family.

This reminds me of my hispanic culture. We have many family gatherings in which my grandparents would always tell us about stories and experiences they had growing up.

It's remarkable to me that this sentence still applies how many hundreds of years later. It reminds me of how the law is oftentimes unjust, particularly in the case of the increased incarceration and conviction rates of minorities. Law doesn't reflect morality, it reflects the will of the elite.

Reminds me of the language box scenario where someone thinks they are speaking in Chinese, but there's translators doing the real work.

Also, the idea of word processors do the same thing. We only see the front of the interface (Microsoft Word) whereas the "CODE" is running all types of procedures in the background (in dos language).

This reminds me of the Kabalistic view of "zimzum" where God in the form of all began to give distinction and form to things out of Himself. From Lights Out to Lights On!

This call and answer is frequent. The repetition emphasizes Abraham’s commitment to God. It reminds me of a soldier being called to attention or called out to war. The response is delivered without emotion. It’s just a duty.

The role of the facilitator is really interesting to me in this context. It sort of reminds me of elements of ‘play theory’ that encourage students to lead activities, because naturally they will gravitate to what is developmentally fulfilling. Often there is an emphasis on caution above all else in a classroom, and although it’s not easy, I think there are certain points where we ought to release that control based on assessed risks and developmental stages of students. In short I think to truly be 'learner driven' we should let students break stuff sometimes, and I hope this source would agree.

This reminds me of when a social media app updates, like Instagram,and at first everyone complains and says that the update is horrible. Then, over time people get used to it and stop complaining about it.

This reminds me of the video we watched about the Flint water crisis. The residents were becoming ill but a lot of them weren't completely aware about how bad it was until later. It became a part of their normal and had to find ways to live around the problem, because there wasn't much else to do.

This sentence, at the end of the article stuck out to me. I really like the way the author of this article made it personal. "The divide was always there if YOU were willing to look.", the way the author put this on the reader makes you feel liable in a sense, makes you feel you should've done something about this issue. The second sentence reminds me of the phrase "equality isn't the same as equity". Just living side by side doesn't mean you have the same experiences or struggles as the others living next to you.This is moving and powerful as well.

I was intrigued by this being organized by books. It reminds me of the Bible in a way. It also has titles of each book like book one is The Argument. This is similar to the bible however the bible is titled in names.

Reminds me of how white supremacy (KKK) is not considered a terrorist group because some people don't think it's wrong to believe this

This reminds me of my experience as the oldest of immigrant parents from Mexico and learning English through school. My elementary school wanted to put me in ESL in the 1990 but my mother refused because she did not want me to be viewed as unintelligent or deficient. She told me years later that she knew I would figure English out and did not want me to be treated or viewed differently because I only knew Spanish. Not only this but at home we were only allowed to speak Spanish because my mother would say that in the U.S. to assimilate you have to leave a part of who you are, your culture and heritage and we were Mexican and always would be. For someone who was new to the country and had little education she understood this concept and how I would be perceived and she did not want that to hold me back or influence how I viewed myself. This way of thinking is very damaging to students academically and personally.

this unified thinking and analysis of prejudices reminds me of the asian philosophy of Confucianism.

This reminds me of the essay from Dr. David L Perry which discussed consciousness.

This reminds me of the other Essay by Blanchard which said "Philosophy is the interdepartmental conciliation agency, the National Labor Relations Board, or if you prefer, the World Court of the intellectual community" (Blanchard, 65)

Reminds me of the Freudian "Id".

This reminds me of what we read and discussed with localization vs. equipotentiality vs. pluripotentiality

This reminds me of the concepts of axioms in Math. There are some fundamental things that cannot be proven so they need to simply be assumed to be true in order for the rest of Math to work.

this reminds me of the when I learned about spectrums in chemistry and how they all work together through the electrical energies.

This reminds me of when my AP Lang class used this image of an iceberg. On top of the iceberg is the visible things we can observe in culture like dress and food, then below the iceberg were things like values. Relative to science, the tip of the iceberg could be science and the bottom of the iceberg is philosophy which searches for the greater depth and meaning behind what is visibly observed

This reminds me of how Japan is more poplar on making robots. I also think that legged robots are helpful and will success in the future.

It reminds me of conjecture mapping. Are we going to make the similar thing?

I found this to be more-so humorous than anything. His comparison to learning to write and read in english to a foreign and difficult language, puts a frustrating visual into the readers head. reminds me of when i was a child and would pretend to read chapter books, when the words on the pages looked like alien hieroglyphics.

This reminds me of how we learned how to read as a child. As children, we memorized sight words until they became fluent. This is what he did to start to learn to read.

This reminds of a game I used to play called Kerbal Space Program. The game simulates realistic calculations and physics involved with space launch, flight, and travel. I have learned more about how difficult it is to launch crafts into space from this game alone than any other textbook could ever teach me.

This reminds me of the article https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764213479369 which I find fascinating! So much more interaction and so many more pathways between traditional media and consumer than in the past.

This reminds me of an article I read in one of my other Legal Studies courses titled "Roe Rage" -- and the notion of democratic constitutionalism. Within this realm of thought, it has been noted that an adoption of what people considered to be enumerated rights in the constitution by groups of people (in this case, conservative enclaves) have been used to provide the backlash for their own movement.

It's really interesting to see how conservatives use euphemisms to make their once "controversial" policies/beliefs sound more socially acceptable. This reminds me of J.B. White's "Law as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Law", in which White examines the central role of rhetoric (namely, diction) in composing an effective legal argument. In this piece, White advances the notion that the same legal argument can be construed in various ways, all of which convey a distinct message- all based on word choice. It would seem that conservatives, too, utilize liberalized diction to win cases and establish their policies in a socially acceptable manner.

This ideological distinction reminds me of Jazz's earlier annotation regarding conservatives using law to bolster what directly benefits them, but not necessarily everyone (the example used being that conservative Christians might espouse religious freedom, yet simultaneously be opposed to a Mosque being built in a predominantly Christian area). In this case, I see Jazz's point much more clearly, so this is some evidence of that!

This reminds me of customs and norms. In the United States where our social solidarity is very organic, it makes sense that we have this "war" on who's morals and norms are the correct ones to follow. It is interesting to think about how religious communities are turning away from the idea that they should have laws that reflect their society's morals to embracing individual rights.

This reminds me of the quote by Danto stating that "Abstract painting is not without content". I am relating Danto's quote to this sentence by Greenberg because in Greenberg's sentence he is stating that Abstract art is not necessary in the self-criticism of pictorial art. Pictures have subject matter whereas abstract paintings do not, indicating that they can not be a base line criteria for pictorial art. One is without the other.

This reminds me of how in modern America, we are now beginning to understand and criticize certain systemic issues because we can watch the issues play-out within the foundations which we have created. Legal systems, social systems, and other systems are being criticized internally by the people who must live out the systems.

I have found so many contradictions in abstract artist philosophy and their actual art, but maybe the contradictions are part of the process, and maybe that is part of my own personal process shedding the more traditional thought forms that I have, forcing me to see things differently. Like Rothko's analysis to flatness leading to transparency and simplicity, I saw this to be very contradicting to his early works were not simplistic at all. They were rather symbolic and complex, and I thought his style looked like child's play. Yet, he defended himself by conjugating the critics (like myself) by reversing the comment.<br> If the critic thought they gained a point, the artist was able to flip it, and negate it. Reminds me of algebra, to find the conjugate of 1 is -1 which equals nothing, in essence artist were able to reverse conjugate their critics, they addressed them but never resolved the citism, in math that would = 0 and nothing can exist over 0, i.e the critics had no argument to hold above the nothingness.

This reminds me of Rothko's choice to use massive canvases for his paintings, to impress a great effect upon the viewer. The result is something similar to the 19th century idea of the sublime, of being overwhelmed.

The way in which Kaprow states "sanity in art" movement is very interesting to me. When is there ever sanity in art?!? This phrase reminds me of the Academies in France in the 18th century, I can see a professor saying this and comparing academic art to that of the insane art of the modernists and avant-garde artists.

To me this seems like it is the beginning of the use for different objects inserted into art. This statement reminds me of the piece shown in one of the lectures that had sand on it to provide texture.

This instantly reminds me of censorship in many countries today. Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist, was killed in 2018 for his dissident work at The Washington Post. His work was an example of text that broke through censorship. Unlike him, most authors will oblige to how they're told to write. You always have to keep in mind when and where a text was written/published due to censorship around the world whether in a certain region or during a certain era.

The rejection of solidarity from the poor Ladino Menchú interacted with is not surprising. The colonialist powers created such a strong caste system that permeated throughout culture and family. It reminds me of the treatment of African Americans by Afro-Latino or African immigrants. There is a desire to not admit to having the same struggles as the “lowest”. I question this mentality, because if one were to align with the “lowest” and to fight for their freedoms, wouldn’t all other freedoms be included in that revolt? If the poor Ladinos were to just advocate for themselves, the indigenous people would be excluded from this fight, but if they were to fight together with the indigenous people, all of their freedoms would be given. Parallel to America, how BLM can be questioned by non-Black POC as they want to focus on their communities struggles, unaware that if they were to liberate the Black community, their liberation would come along with that.

This line really resonated with me because it reminds me of the Prison Industrial Complex that is upheld in the US, where the rich and the government work together and have carefully designed a violent system of imprisonment to punish and oppress a certain group so that the power and money is more and more concentrated within a small group at the top of the ladder. Also the way that the Indigenous people are exploited for their labor, forced out of their homes, and deceived by the government all reflect the same internal and external exploitation that occur at the hands of the US government.

This comment makes me think of my own experience during my senior year of high school. One of my friends, although joking, said "oh you'll be fine getting into a good college, you're Asian, a girl, and from Maine." This definitely made me wonder if I had had to work as hard to get where I was or if I had been given things due to my identifying traits.

This also reminds me of the school scandals and when Asain-American students sued Harvard over affirmative action last year. I didn't follow the case too closely, but I wonder how this trial affected how students viewed affirmative action, especially how white students viewed the case and what happened afterwards considering the thoughts of classmates Bailey describes.

Williams says that the selective tradition chooses cultural work-art/literature- to highlight and obscure based on the dominant ideology. Work that maintains the dominant ideology-capitalism- is generally highlighted and canonized, while work that is truly subversive is hidden and obscured. This is a somewhat unconscious process. So when we think about why we study Marlowe, and why he has been canonized we have to consider that the reason the culture keeps selecting him may be because he maintains the dominant ideological structure. This reminds me of Bartel and all of those critics from our first readings claiming that Marlowe is truly subversive. While he may have been for his own time, perhaps he isn't for ours and instead upholds our current culture of capitalist globalization.

Contextualize Water has always been using a lot in the ancient Chinese thinkers’ philosophy; everything is called wanwu (万物) in Chinese is derived from water. However, according to the different philosophers in ancient China, there are always the various meaning of water. In the reading, Confucius said, “What passes is perhaps like this: day and night it never lets up.” (1997, Allan 11). It expresses the thoughts of how time changes frequently, even it did not mention water in the saying, but it is metaphors that time is just like water; when it flows past, it will not come back. When I finished the reading, it reminds me of a saying in Analects, “The Master said, ‘The wise find pleasure in water; the virtuous find pleasure in hills. The wise are active; the virtuous are tranquil. The wise are joyful; the virtuous are long-lived.” Back in high school, when I learned this, my Chinese teacher explained this saying to us that wise and virtuous are both excellent characters that gentleman should have. However, different in different periods, a gentleman is looking for different characters. When they are young, they are more active like water, and when the gentleman gets older, they are more mature like hills. Now think back to the saying “What passes is perhaps like this: day and night it never lets up.”, I have different thoughts, time will pass by and will not come back, but the process of the time is different; it is changing by the time.

C., & Lau, D. C. (1998). The Analects (Penguin Classics) (1st ed.). Penguin Classics.

this reminds me of the idea of hedonia vs. eudaimonia -- if a person wants eudaimonia, it's harder because it takes more effort over a longer period of time

This reminds me of the process of listing out your assumptions to then question them. Are they the same?

This poem reminds me of Papa Po. He liked it when I sent it to him at the start of our first year teaching AP together.

This reminds me of an artists table of inspiration where a round table was made of movable rings full of nouns, verbs, and adjectives that could be manipulated and rearranged like these cards.

This sentence reminds me of the last article we read about how one cannot be an environmentalist and racist.

This reminds me of the readings from the first week when we learned all about what environmental justice is and about how in order to resolve climate issues we need to put the people who are most often adversely affected by them in a position of decision making power

This description reminds me of an article I read about how expansionists had to essentially battle swarms of locusts out west. I wonder if the difficulties of clearing out land like that reinforced industrialist ideas that clearing out the land was improving it.

This depiction kind of reminds me of the reading we did about early settlers who assumed the land to be plentiful. In this case, it's almost detrimental for them to deal with wild pigeons regularly.

This reminds me of what we talk about in class. That every student has strengths they bring to the classroom. You have to look for them.

This reminds me of this interview with a porn actress whose mission was to repeat this message to those that watch porn regularly the fact that it is not reality- what her and others in the pornography industry are showing are a fantasy, and not representative of what normal relationships and sex always look like

Here W.E.B Dubois is showcasing some arguments or disagreements between himself and Washington. Washington reminds me of Martin Luther King and his peaceful protest and mild mannerism. Washington wanted for unity within the south between the whites and African Americans by working their way up to become a superior wealthy negro and in a ways "proving" their right to be free and active in the field and strong workers in their communities. Dubois on the other hand wanted all rights legally fought for and obtained. He believed in civil rights and laws that should be followed no mater your socio-class or status. so who is correct and who is not? I would say that it's all about how you understand what's going on and your opinion on what's right and whats wrong. I say that both were successful at achieving rights for African Americans during this time just with different strategies.

Here the author is debunking a myth. This reminds me of the "little engines" you wrote last week. Most people think , but in reality__. If you have a topic that fit that engine you could adopt the organization of blog.

This is a very eloquent and poetic line... I think that Trethewey was trying to remind the audience of our own mortality and how easily our lives are affected by nature.

Social transgression (a woman acting like a man) was figured as sexual transgression

this reminds me of the readings and how the hand was considered to be masculine and manly. In the lecture video we talked about painting being a 'man's job' because it required manual labor

The idea of fluidity and shifting in the way categories shift reminds me of ideas brought up in my Intro Women's Studies course. In talking about the patriarchy, we discussed that one must look at the multiple categories people fit into within a larger, baseline category to see how some who are oppressed or minority groups can still benefit from larger systems in relation to others in one of their shared groups; For example, a straight black man will benefit from the patriarchy as a straight man, but will face oppression for being black. However, there is still male privilege because a straight black woman may be oppressed for her gender identity and her race.

This goes back to the intersectionality we discussed with the Nash reading as well. Getting into further levels of identity will show how a person can be a part of a marginalized group of people but not share the same experiences because of individuality as Ames pointed out in class, and also because of the many identity groups one may identify with. As we discussed in my Intro Women's Studies class, men generally benefit from the patriarchy but not all men have gained equally from it.

In this case, Billings is stating that although part of a marginalized group, she still benefits more than someone else may in a marginalized group because she has the social position of being highly educated and English speaking.

• Sophie W.

This reminds me of Michelle Alexander's analysis of racial inequality in her novel The New Jim Crow: a central premise of hers is that although America appears to be a more racially-equitable state, these supposed "equities" are actually constructed out of a Eurocentric model of society. Because society and its moral standards are centered on what (particularly) white men deemed morally just, if these same standards are applied to all races/ethnicities, we only have the guise of equity with the underlying fact that white people still maintain subtle control over our society. Interesting how this same idea presents itself in this article as well.

This reminds me of what Martin Luther King Jr. said in his Letter From the Birmingham Jail, "An unjust law is no law at all."

This reminds me of the idea of "moral majority" and how for hundreds of year, men were the majority of society so their morals were so prominent. Women have to convince society that their work is of equal work as men's.

1.Reminds me of a book I read. It was about a girl who was stuck in the cold for a long time.

Is Tommo attempting to attribute baby-jesus-like qualities to the Typee's beliefs? similarly this reminds me of Oronooko

Tommo describes the Typee a lot through how they compare to European/White people and civilization, as I will futher annotate, but I am curious as to why? It's probably a number of reasons. This reminds me a little of Aphra Behn's Oronooko in how it presents the abject.